Very interesting, always enjoy your videos, thanks
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
Glad you like them!
@pctrashtalk20692 жыл бұрын
It might be interesting to look at a fuel cell Velocity kitplane. It comes in several variations, single engine and twin engine. Not VTOL but they are roomy with doors and cruise pretty fast and have the stall resistant canard design.
@TeddyLeppard2 жыл бұрын
It is such an odd duck aircraft. Beautiful and simple, but has so many limitations.
@BobMinelli Жыл бұрын
The FUTURE could be BRIGHT and FULL of FLIGHT! 🌏
@Savan_Triveda2 жыл бұрын
I like it. Fuel cells. Thats cool.
@carltheyoda21552 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate you for analyzing the Blackfly! I've often wondered how it could be upgraded for longer flights.
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@jamesdeath34772 жыл бұрын
Some small wheels on the wing tips and taking off from a runway maybe?
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
@@jamesdeath3477 There is already one. www.emotion-aircraft.com/
@williamcostello86242 жыл бұрын
Great! I'm sold.So why are there no homebuilt aircraft of something similiar to this? This does not look so hard to come up with a simple design
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
My thoughts exactly
@RonLWilson2 жыл бұрын
Until battery storage capacity per weight gets much better it seems hydrogen may be the way to go for e-VTOL aviation. While you are scaling that up it might be worth looking at a three seat version where one can have one person and some cargo plus the fuel cell or two person with no cargo and the fuel cell or three people with limited range or one person and two fuel cells with maximum range.
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
Good suggestion
@dejayrezme86172 жыл бұрын
I don't know, if you imagine living off grid and commuting to the nearest city for work or shopping, the blackfly is already fine. Ignoring regulations, the international version has 12 kWh and 40 miles / 64.4 km. That is more than enough to commute. And small battery means quick recharging from a normal outlet or directly from solar panels. Energy efficiency is better than a big electric car and embodied energy is probably less too. If you would re-engineer how our society operates you could replace almost all medium range personal transport. This plus bicycles and trains. Most roads would no longer be needed.
@Suro_One2 жыл бұрын
Really nice!
@mikeoakes7472 жыл бұрын
damn, we really need the tech for these to fly atleast 3 hours.
@kentwilliams41522 жыл бұрын
I keep wondering how a person gets into and out of the black fly?
@aullvrch2 жыл бұрын
This was really cool! I would love to hear more estimates like this for other possible aircraft. It would be neat to see your math and assumptions made written down as well. Either as part of the video or separately. Awesome work!
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
Noted! All the videos where I have presented the underlying maths and assumptions get people really bored. You can see them on the channel. People quickly switch it off. This really hurts my channel ranking and my future videos are also effected. The only thing I can do is create a separate channel for the maths and make a community of like minded people.
@aullvrch2 жыл бұрын
@@ElectricAviation Fair. I follow a lot of fun math or intuitive math channels and it can be made entertaining! I thought this one made the maths not too boring because of the creative thinking involved with it. Imagining how craft could be and using the maths to show how!:)
@TheChrisp12312 жыл бұрын
what would the max range be with the fuel cell system?
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
About 140 miles
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
@KenSDCA 80 miles p h
@Soothsayer2102 жыл бұрын
very interesting to note that the increase in flight time with Fuel Cells. So why are they NOT doing it?
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
As mentioned in the video, it wont remain part 103. They will have to go for several year long certification process for it to be legal if the weight is increased. This costs a lot of money
@tallbunyan802 жыл бұрын
This is a video on how to make the Blackfly terrible. Leave the ideas to the team working on it.
@heathcwalker21 күн бұрын
Why not a hybrid that uses high octane gasoline?
@andrewgardiner4159 Жыл бұрын
I'm a great believer in fuel-cell power, but for this aircraft there are two problems that I see ... 1. Storage of hydrogen in the aircraft. Unless new technology comes up, it will mean that the tanks will have store the gas at ENORMOUS pressures. 2. That said, where will one get the hydrogen from? And how to refuel the aircraft? Currently airfields have no storage facilities for the gas and building one will be hugely expensive, forgetting for one moment, all the certification of the storage facilities - which will be essential. As we all know, hydrogen is highly inflammable, so the certifying authorities will be pushing hard to ensure that there will be no leaks.
@macrumpton2 жыл бұрын
Considering the Mirai has been available since 2015 but there are less than 20k sold I am not sure economies of scale will help much. I wonder if you could increase the blackfly range by increasing the prop size.
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
The existing props diameters nearly cover all of wing length. The wing size would have to be increased
@macrumpton2 жыл бұрын
@@ElectricAviation Or decrease the number of props. Or do both and keep the number of props the same but increase their size and the wing size.
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
@@macrumpton Prop size increase results in higher noise signature
@macrumpton2 жыл бұрын
@@ElectricAviation It would certainly change the noise signature towards a lower pitch, but I would rather listen to a single full-size helicopter than a cloud of drones with the equivalent thrust.
@NSResponder Жыл бұрын
@@macrumpton The chopper's noise propagates much farther than small props do. Higher frequency sounds dissipate far more quickly.
@jasoncrandall2 жыл бұрын
VTOL will still always require an airport. You won’t be landing in your back garden unless you live in a the boonies and have a lot of land. Helicopters been out since the 50s and nobody is landing them in their garden.
@quirkyMakes2 жыл бұрын
I want one so bad....
@mauricioserafim59622 жыл бұрын
Podemos Ser Conhece e troca ideia Construtiva com Todo respeito
@jamesstepp19252 жыл бұрын
Oh, and we desperately need to improve our government's focus onto real issues instead of contrived useless, childish manufactured conflict for any of this to be possible in the first place.
@mpoelsma75612 жыл бұрын
The only way to get personal flight to the market is at least devolep systems who can contain a minimum of 4 persons, like the family salon car. There is the biggest full market potentional. And a low noise reducal because mostly you have to deal with saburban aereas.
@Lee-qe3bm7 ай бұрын
I don't understand why all the videos, it's been going on for over 5 years !! You get everyone excited about getting one !!! But you can't buy one that's really crazy.
@sharvansir59792 жыл бұрын
by merging of blackfly,Jetson one and orb features some better design can come out . alone something somwhre thre will be some drawbacks.so merge for the benefits of mankind come out flying car dream true . blackfly takeoff characteristics, Jetson one compactness and orb wing design are excellent.
@jasoncrandall2 жыл бұрын
Why not just buy a Cessna 172? Flying cars been out for 100 years. The black fly is reinventing the wheel and doing so poorly.
@jasoncrandall2 жыл бұрын
VTOL will still always require a pin airport. You won’t be landing in your back garden unless you live in a the boonies and have a lot of land. Helicopters been out since the 50s and nobody is landing them in their garden.
@LosZonga2 жыл бұрын
Adding 110 Kg of LiPo will do almost the same trick at the half the cost and no additional complications of hydrogen and no hydrogen refiling needed as added cost per mile. Also a U shape redesign of the wings will add lift surface without extra length of the wings keeping it all nice and tidy. My point is if we redesign the FAA requirement for electric powered ultralights around 300-400 kg this can still be made. Law should keep up with innovation not the other way around.
@nav6620072 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this excellent analysis. I would suspect the formal certification for a version with hydrogen fuel cells would be particular about the potential safety of the system in a crash. How might this be compared to the certification that the Toyota Murai had to have to ensure motorway safety?
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
As long as hydrogen is allowed to vent externally its fine. Any leakage form the cylinder should not come into the cockpit. So an external chamber will be required for hydrogen tanks
@gehtdichnixan47042 жыл бұрын
Check out this hybrid electric glider: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pHKmk4Orgc2NbbM
@NSResponder Жыл бұрын
I'm curious about the prospect of replacing the battery altogether with a supercapacitor, and what would happen to the weight and performance in that case. Also, I'd like to see what could happen with a new rotary engine like the Liquid Piston driving a generator instead of a fuel cell. I'm sure it could be far cheaper than $40K for the fuel cell.
@tobiasreichelt888 Жыл бұрын
What L/D value did you assume for the 6.16m wingspan?
@XRP747E2 жыл бұрын
Nice video, well done!
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@realvanman12 жыл бұрын
Wow, I hadn't realized that the fuel cells had that good of a power to weight ratio. That seems like a much more likely way forward for electric aviation, at least for the time being.
@janedoe6350 Жыл бұрын
Yes, but how easy is it to recharge a fuel cell when you live in a remote location miles from any kind of infrastructure? You can't just plug it in to the mains electricity and recharge overnight, right? My closest town is 6 miles away over rough terrain. I need something that will get me to town and back once per week. I have access to gasoline, electricity and bottled gas. But where am i gonna get Hydrogen from?
@Finn-Germe812 жыл бұрын
Is it possible to combine tiny home and drones like a drone camper van. I would love to live in a ship/ drone
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
it will have to be a proper airship then
@Jkauppa2 жыл бұрын
you can do all the components yourself with ease, especially the metal-air aluminium-spiral anode fuel cell with standard carbon air-electrode, ethanol-koh electrolyte will limit metal passive corrosion, ie, non-active losses
@Jkauppa2 жыл бұрын
use manual potentiometer control with brushed or preferably brushless true dc motors
@Jkauppa2 жыл бұрын
flywheel, flat disc, r=1m, f=3333Hz (200krpm) has energy density of 30kWh/kg, design equation S=E/m=(pi^2)*(r^2)*(f^2), r=flywheel disc radius, pi = 3.14159, f=revolutions per second, should be floating on vertical maglev bearing stick, its the easiest, gives gyro stabilization at same time, try contra rotating twin flywheel battery, same or better, adjustable, than plain hydrogen, jet engines have revolution speeds of 200krpm, its already been done, but use that in the flywheel energy storage, and yes, electric motor-generator combo, assume 100% efficiency, for real
@Jkauppa2 жыл бұрын
put the flywheel in a "ducted fan" configuration, so the the disc spins against a air-lev bearing housing
@brandonfranklin45332 жыл бұрын
I would like to see an actual helicopter design made electric :)
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
There is already one called the Robinson R44 Electric
@Eugensdiet2 жыл бұрын
I always enjoy your videos. I'm surprised that airspeed and range are not mentioned. The biggest problem I see with the "Black Fly" is it's name. It would be difficult to find a worse name. Thinking about it for a moment I actually came up with a couple I will not share. Here are some I think would be better - Black Thunder, Black Lightning, Black Dove, Black Hawk. Perhaps next time you visit the Black Fly you could provide wing loading, cruise speed, range especially if you are looking at variations . I guess knowing the ceiling isn't that important. Just thought about possible emergencies and the on that jumps out is electrical fire. It doesn't have any provisions for an event like that. I think flight safety would be a good topic for a future video.Please keep up the good work.
@ElectricAviation2 жыл бұрын
A military version of it with the name Black Thunder would be very apt. The good thing about the black fly is that the batteries arent in the cockpit. they are in the wings, behind the propellers. Lining of a fire retardant material would protect the pilot. The cruise speed is 80 mph. I wanted to give more numbers but feel people in general dont care much other than flight time.
@Eugensdiet2 жыл бұрын
@@ElectricAviation That's pretty fast. Having the batteries in the wing isn't all that great. In the event of a battery fire the wing would fail quite rapidly.
@codetech55982 жыл бұрын
How about "Lyme Tick"?
@LosZonga2 жыл бұрын
@@Eugensdiet If you prefer sitting on them?
@Eugensdiet2 жыл бұрын
@@LosZonga Another problem with the batteries in the wing is dumb bell effect. Possibly the battery could be 4 parallel parts with temperature monitoring so in the event one would would catch fire it would automatically be ejected but attached to a cable so it didn't fall onto a house or person.
@lubricatedgoat2 жыл бұрын
What about using a gas-turbine generator running on biodiesel? Its exhaust could be vectored rearward to produce some thrust as well. Surely the power to weight ratio is much better than a fuel cell? (plus producing and compressing H2 is so horrendously inefficient)