Getting heavy "Nausicaa Valley of The Wind" vibes from the first one. Wonder if it was inspired by her glider...
@patrickgarmon58612 жыл бұрын
Omg yes
@nedflanders41582 жыл бұрын
It's a shame the video didn't specify because YES it is supposed to be a copy of the nausicaa Valley of the wind glider.
@brian63912 жыл бұрын
It is!
@kitakazehai Жыл бұрын
姫様!
@yarrlegap694011 ай бұрын
very good point ... is does bear a resemblance ...
@TrangleC3 жыл бұрын
I was born in 1978. When I was a kid in the 80s and then a teen in the 90s, everyone was always talking about flying cars and how surely in the year 2000 everyone would have them. It always kind of was treated as this holy grail and main benchmark of futurism. Flying cars and fusion power, which is always 30 to 50 years away, according to the experts and has been so my whole life. What I find the most fascinating about the current advancements in flying technology is that they didn't come from any of those rich weirdos who were trying to build a flying car for the last 50 years, nor from the aircraft or the helicopter or the car industry, but that it all came from remote controlled toys that just got scaled up and more and more advanced. It really came out of the left field. It is like back when mobile phones first got popular and suddenly the world of photography and cameras got totally shaken up and turned on its head not by companies that had been building cameras since generations, but by new mobile phone companies that originally had nothing to do with cameras and photography. Suddenly Nokia and later Apple were the world's biggest seller of cameras, not Kodak or Nikon. It was the same when cars were invented. Back then there were big, successful manufacturers of horse drawn wagons and not one of them got in on the building cars business, as you could have expected. Instead the cars all were built by totally new companies that hadn't existed before. Seems as if those big, emerging, world changing trends in technology always come out of the left field.
@esecallum3 жыл бұрын
wait until,an idiot crashes thru your roof or window..
@Mr.McWatson3 жыл бұрын
Big companies simply can't react or move as quickly as a start up. A lot of companies put a great deal of money into their innovation and design apartments, so they can keep up with the changing world. For example, big bottle producing companies and breweries don't really know how to compete with microbreweries.
@leonobles2283 жыл бұрын
Change the year from 1978 to 1949 and your first paragraph pretty much describes me. At age 72, I have been waiting for flying cars all my life. It does seem like the technology is finally starting to get there, and maybe I'll see it become reality in my lifetime, but it won't be me driving (flying) one of them to work. Too late for that! You make a great point about the genesis of new technologies NOT coming from existing big companies already in the business, but let's not forget Studebaker. They were making wagons since the 1800s and were a major force in automobiles until the middle of the 20th century. I guess the lesson there is that even if Toyota or GM doesn't invent the successful commercial flying car, they might very well become competitors in the market for them.
@randybird99793 жыл бұрын
@@leonobles228 in the end of days knowledge will increase, I am right there beside you
@derrickkeppler6132 жыл бұрын
It came from us. That guy that had enough belief in himself and drive and determination to take an idea from ones thoughts and manifest it into reality. It's a beautiful thing. I wish more people understood
@douglasradcliffe9812 жыл бұрын
The last prototype on this list was the most exciting and the most aesthetically pleasing. great video!
@Stratoliner11 ай бұрын
Tethering is actually a rule sett by the FAA for safety reasons.
@artdonovandesign2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the great, comprehensive video! No extraneous mumbo- jumbo. Just a great overview.
@DetroitFettyghost2 жыл бұрын
The Jetson 1 is really awesome, looks safe, and user friendly. Who wouldn't want one?
@Oh-ou4lp2 жыл бұрын
me
@DetroitFettyghost2 жыл бұрын
@@Oh-ou4lp well aren't you fun because I heard you just wanted one in a contest but they read your comments so they decided never mind and they gave it to me LOL just kidding have a great day
@Salmach8083 жыл бұрын
They all are interesting and I'd love to see further development of them. The Blackfly and Jetson One are the two I would feel safe enough to try. Thank you for the upload and welcome back
@Tech_Planet3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, yeah I agree those are probably the two safest ones!
@Cat-fy5lw3 жыл бұрын
I like the Zeva. But I think it would be safer if the pilot sat upright in the exact middle under a Plexiglass bubble and the craft sat flat on the ground on legs. Also, it should use ducted thrust coming from cleverly disguised vents to look more like a UFO.
@tmayorca87702 жыл бұрын
Jet packs are safe.
@yapandasoftware2 жыл бұрын
From the Model T to the Bugatti was about 100 years... from now to another 100 years we'll be jumping from one dimension to another.
@khaderhindi94492 жыл бұрын
L?
@Tech_Duster3 жыл бұрын
Straight to the point. I loved it.
@speakthetruth1103 жыл бұрын
Great video ! The Zeva Aero looks promising. Appreciate the fact that the videos thumbnail correctly reflects the videos content.
@elementneon8 ай бұрын
But not the title. Comments like the above are not found nor needed in videos that ACTUALLY reflect the purported content.
@Patiboke3 жыл бұрын
1:15 Wow, the Omni Hoverboard looks so dangerous. One wrong move that takes you over a critical angle and you'll make an irrecoverable dive. If the platform would be below the propellers it would be naturally stable.
@danielch66623 жыл бұрын
That is how he steers. By leaning. Like the video says, the prototype has no flight controls.
@Patiboke3 жыл бұрын
@@danielch6662 Sure, I see that, but if you steer a little too much you're dead.
@daviddelosier19153 жыл бұрын
Patrick, I agree with you on the load being under the slicing devices. Also, with the props above the pilot you could have a quick release of some sort. The in an emergency you could release the device and deploy a parachute, provided you have enough altitude. It just seems like common sense with the propulsion above the pilot/load, you would naturally have a lot more stability. With the computer controller maintaining additional stability it seems like it would be much safer than trying to fight off 8 or 16 propellers after the pilot leans too far in the wrong direction.
@remotelyinteresting99983 жыл бұрын
Pendulum rocket fallacy
@MsSomeonenew2 жыл бұрын
Nope, that makes it unstable. Pendulums work the way you imagine when you have a stable anchor point, but in flight everything is moving, so having the weight lower down actually destabilizes that system.
@johndrake54673 жыл бұрын
I only clicked onto this for the Zeva. I've been interested in the "flying flapjack" experimental aircraft since I was a boy over 40 years ago. I'm so stoked that someone has potentially found a way to commercialize this design!
@thexrman2 жыл бұрын
We built the animation for it, yet the real thing is even more impressive - check out their website for some more up to date video
@princecharon3 жыл бұрын
I really like how very 'Miyazaki' the Opensky looks. Quite beautiful, and clearly a labour of love, as well as engineering skill.
@alex.thedeadite2 жыл бұрын
The inventor said it's based on the "Mehve" glider from Nausicaa so yeah it is and I LOVE IT.
@AndSendMe2 жыл бұрын
@@alex.thedeadite That ought to be mentioned in any description of the vehicle such as here.
@wastingyourtime147811 ай бұрын
These people should be in the mainstream news. Not boring crap. This is inspirational stuff. Subscribing
@fournierdon21723 жыл бұрын
The commentary at 1:29 describes them all, absolutely correctly, as 'contraptions'.
@tmayorca87705 ай бұрын
That's what the first airplanes were called too.
@nikoverde47353 жыл бұрын
the first one is from Nausicaa by Hayao Miyazaki
@scottjensen75552 жыл бұрын
I've always dreamed of flying, so this kind of makes me wish I was younger so I could experience what develops over the next 30 or so years.
@tonyping31592 жыл бұрын
Me too!!
@kentneumann52092 жыл бұрын
Right there with you. The functional human life span is a ripoff. Mentally and physically. If we can get past this deadly vax time bomb administration, and border restrictions, we can go to Panama and get stem cell IV infusions that will restore function to our organs, giving us the healthy state of a youthful body. That and other reverse aging science is here. So it's now just a matter of money and politics. Money to afford it. Politics to avoid the early death the gov would prefer you have, in order to avoid paying for your existence. Social security and other social welfare of the people systems are going to fail cuz they rely on a strong work force of the population to remain perpetual. A strong workforce is impossible when the work is all taken to 3rd world countries. No one paying in means no money to pay out. Therefore it's just a matter of good business to put the old unproductive workers down. No reason to keep them on if they aren't actively contributing anymore. Like livestock. The biggest contribution to society we can make now is as fertilizer for Bill Gates vast agriculture land properties. And that is exactly what is going down right now. A virus that targets the old and sick. A vax that targets a controlled percentage of the population at a time. It's like a lottery system. But it's not fair unless everyone plays it. Thus, mandates. The reported 40% jump in deaths of 18 to 64 year old people by the insurance companies is no conspiracy theory. And it happened after the vax, not after the covid. A 10% jump is a once every 200 year probability. In the case of natural disaster. Such as a tsunami or hurricane, etc. Over population isn't about resource availability. It's about financial stability and control. Reset means start over. The super wealthy already have access to the regenerative science and tech. All they need now is a generation of people to be raised without any concept of personal freedom or employee rights. They are currently paying healthy individuals for their sperm and eggs. $10,000 for eggs, $12,000 a year for sperm. Google it. See for yourself. You must meet genetic physical specifications in order to qualify. It sounds like a sci-fi nightmare. That's because it is.
@davidmcconnell51472 жыл бұрын
I agree.....I'm not really afraid of dying, but I really hate to miss out on all the wonders that are coming. Unless, of course, we manage to destroy our planet, LOL.
@Fallbr00kwhat2 жыл бұрын
Bro hit up your local air park and get some flight lessons!! You don't regret it!! Learn to fly ! It's less then 10k so the price of an old Honda Civic? And that will include 40 hrs
@308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane2 жыл бұрын
Just go paramotoring. Anyone can do it.
@HolySoliDeoGloria8 ай бұрын
2:25 (and 4:37) "MK" or "Mk" is read as "mark."
@pirobot668beta3 жыл бұрын
The 'Opensky' personal jet looks like it was inspired by 'Nausica'! Which is a good thing. Q: what do you do with engine failure if your aircraft has no wings? A: Fall to the ground like a stone unless you have a parachute. The 'Zev' and 'Blackfly' are the only two with a slim chance at gliding under zero-power conditions.
@swordguy83 жыл бұрын
It was definitely inspired by Nausicaa. That's why it's "M-02". M stands for mehve.
@Qualitaetspruefer2 жыл бұрын
Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind (1984) .. You're right!
@jenniferstewarts48512 жыл бұрын
It was, he saw that craft and set out to make it real. There's a big documentary on it.
@jean-marclamothe8859 Жыл бұрын
Good question what happens when it stop during flight?
@lookaround.34232 жыл бұрын
Jetson is dope but the skateboard type (forgot the name) is my favorite model. I can see many of these things taking over. Cool vid!
@chronicawareness99863 жыл бұрын
yoo i love you channel.. and oh my god this is the stuff we should have had 30 years ago
@Tech_Planet3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, welcome to the channel!
@guydavid86563 жыл бұрын
Nice , the evolution continues
@kenenomoto37353 жыл бұрын
There's more to understand about the Opensky M-02J than its technology. It is the fact that the creators of the M-02J actually created and flew a new concept of aircraft, winning the bureaucratic paperwork and airworthiness certification process in modern Japan, where it is the most difficult country in the world to build and own a flying machine since WW2. The makers of the Opensky M-02J should be applauded for winning permission to fly from the world's worst bureaucracy, the Japanese bureaucracy.
@stainlesssteelfox13 жыл бұрын
It is also almost an exact copy of Mowe, a personal flying machine used in the feature length anime 'Nausicaa of the Valley of Wind' by the titular character. It is one of Hayao Miyazaki's earliest films. I saw it on display at the Worldcon in Japan in 2007, though at that timne they hadn't yet yet added the jet engine and were flying it as a glider.
@_apey2 жыл бұрын
It is refreshing to hear the narrator use the proper term 'aircraft' when referring to multiple air vehicles. So many kiddos now days say 'aircrafts' yet no such word exists. Kuddos to the narrator!
@shannono.58353 жыл бұрын
IMO Blackfly is the most commercially ready personal aircraft. If I could afford it, I would buy one tomorrow
@DivergentDroid2 жыл бұрын
It's o.k. but I still think the 25 mile range (with 20 % reserve) in the US sucks and makes it not worth the purchase. That's 12.5 miles effective range (8 kWh battery) until you have to turn around and go home. It can charge 80 percent full in 25 minutes but you would have to be able to charge it on the go if you need to go farther then 25 miles. That takes planning your day carefully. At a speed of 60 mph your flying time in between charges is 25 minutes. Not a lot of time. I'd like to see it doubled at least. 200 lbs weight limit.. I wonder how heavy a spare battery would be to carry. Also, I hate the squarish design. It's 13.5 feet long by 13.7 feet wide and you need 36 inches takeoff and landing. It's only a one person craft, I'd want to slim it down a bit. I could live with 6 feet by 4 feet but I'd make it even smaller. I like small cars. My motorcycle is a 150cc scooter and my car is a Mercedes Benz Smart Car, one of the smallest cars legally sold in the US.
@MultiTomcat672 жыл бұрын
@4:08 , #1 The Jetson One had me snickering right away and it looks like fun to fly.
@suszy57122 жыл бұрын
I bet some of these have been mistaken for UFO'S. It would be pretty freaky looking up and see one of these flying around!
@takillyfishing67922 жыл бұрын
I mean if it was mistakin at all it's a ufo unknown flying object
@SlickArmor2 жыл бұрын
All UFOs are mistaken ID.
@crispy-k3 жыл бұрын
The worst part about fake videos, that being inventions, pranks, you name it... Is that it contributes to making people less smart. It's really sad, and abusive (only done for fame/likes/subs and end goal, monetary gain). Nice video, and nice to point out that the fake videos were fake. You're doing a good part! Got my sub and like :)
@kentwilliams41523 жыл бұрын
How does one get into the Black Fly?
@robb40442 жыл бұрын
#5: FINALLY A HOVERBOARD THAT ACTUALLY HOVERS!. And flies. Good vid.
@mitchellwalther3 жыл бұрын
I'd love that jetson one
@miketee24442 жыл бұрын
The jet gloves all over the net made it game over for many other crafts. More range is all they need.
@jpwillm52523 жыл бұрын
Blackfly 1:50 😎
@kyletracey58193 жыл бұрын
Wont see it in my lifetime but maybe my grand kids might. Things move so fast thesedays. I sure miss the 80,s. Life was simple
@jessielee85113 жыл бұрын
These flying machines are great. Just a little out of my price range!
@mikayla_collie8 ай бұрын
i think the jetson one is the most viable option for personal use thus far. the design is very nice!
@michaelmartinez13453 жыл бұрын
Interesting designs!!! I prefer to focus on the conventional homebuilt aircraft designs with a conventional set of wings , fuselage & an empenage... The conventional aircraft will have the capability to glide.
@asahmosskmf46392 жыл бұрын
I think its that way with a lot of things. I mean building most common planes and jets is cheap enough to make money off, but not too cheap. And safe enough, like why most houses or cars look kind of similar. Just safe enough, and made so the business makes money. The fancy bubble houses and curvy cars of the 1950's concept art is just too expensive to shape and put together the house or car. Plus its not even useful. I dont think the shape of cars or buildings is going to change drastically in the future.
@MaxSMoke7779 ай бұрын
Those are impressive suicide machines, all but guaranteed to kill their pilots! I like the Head-First models, so they can "make it quick". The Quad-Copter ones, based on drone tech will certain make it shocking. From my own experience, remoting piloting FPV drones, I can tell you, when they fail, they fail quick and spectacularly! They don't just fall out of the sky, they drive themselves into the ground with gusto!
@xavierpaquin8 ай бұрын
😂
@glasslinger3 жыл бұрын
As long as these contraptions are using blowing air for suspension they are doomed to be expensive toys. Any practical "blowing air" application will be more like a conventional helicopter than these toys until a major breakthrough in energy storage is achieved.
@waynejones61443 жыл бұрын
Yep , it's all fun until the the batteries die, LOL!
@AArrddeeLHH3 жыл бұрын
@@waynejones6144 If I'm gonna get off the ground, I really prefer having a device with a glide ratio better than a rock.
@waynejones61443 жыл бұрын
@@AArrddeeLHH Amen!
@cvjanzen5502 жыл бұрын
All of them are very cool. Great video
@kurtn48193 жыл бұрын
I think many companies will choose these as a quick alternative to helicopters in a variety of situations. Light, easy to transport, store & maintain, requires minimal regulations, skills & certifications, minimal fuel costs, low insurance costs, and at one 300th the overall cost of a copter.
@EddieTheH2 жыл бұрын
But without the inherent safety of a helicopter. Autorotation is important. They're also waaaaaaay less efficient than a coaxial helicopter design.
@mikeyjohnson5888 Жыл бұрын
Helicopters are still a cheaper safer more efficient way to fly compared to these things
@randomgrinn4 ай бұрын
In the 1980s I ordered a pamphlet from Moeller Corp, from an ad in Popular Mechanics which was going to put out a 6 motor flying saucer for $20k in a year or two. Kept that pamphlet for decades. Still waiting.
@stevenwilgus89823 жыл бұрын
I am a pilot, and I have to tell you the idea of unlicensed individuals taking to the skies like this frightens me. We have an a problem with drunk drivers on the ground. I just can't even begin to start to imagine the carnage that's going to happen over a period of time in the industry of all these types taken collectively, it's not a good idea I think it's a bad idea but progress will occur. I personally hope none of them do anything stupid but of course as a fools wish because a lot of fools will do something. And I'll be doing it while are flying and if they killed them selves at all lockdown but they hurt someone else well that's where you start getting heavy handed legislation. And that's going to come.
@thalarctosarkticos80753 жыл бұрын
O você diz é de se conjecturar, e me trouxe a memória a matéria sobre um caminhão da volvo, que só acionava o motor após o motorista fazer o uso do bafômetro incorporado ao mesmo, e o teste feito, foi com um bombom recheado com de licor de cereja. Acredito que para usar este tipo de veículo deveriam ser agregados vários tipos de sistemas de segurança semelhantes, leitura de íris entre outros.
@AvoidsPikes-3 жыл бұрын
I agree. Alcoholics, potheads, meth heads, and Biden voters should not be licensed to fly any of these things
@DZ-rf6ks3 жыл бұрын
@@thalarctosarkticos8075 - English Moron, English!!!
@danielschechter81302 жыл бұрын
The Omni Hoverboard is the Silver Surfer! Very cool.
@kingtigerbooks11623 жыл бұрын
Beautiful jets. I wish I could fly one over a city or through the Grand Canyon. For those interested in such things these are my 3 favorite aviation art books: - Aviation Art of Lou Drendel by Lou Drendel - Grumman F-14 Tomcat by Dave Parsons - Great Fighter Jets of the Galaxy by Tim Gibson
@Psalm-yg6yi3 жыл бұрын
Great videos. Thx Merry Christmas 2021~
@MrJdsenior3 жыл бұрын
If you mean tethered from a chopper, they ALL work when operating in that mode.
@claybornlewis2763 жыл бұрын
If four airbags go off underneath they take a split second to open you could survive a crash land and then
@dfinney142 жыл бұрын
The Jetson One is really nice and I think has a chance to be a future product for the public.
@tihzho3 жыл бұрын
Jetson 1 - would a hybrid be possible - small gas engine / alternator and battery? An Air Prius?
@alphagt623 жыл бұрын
That would make great sense. A gas engine making the electricity for the electric motors would increase your flying time in a major way.
@darthmittens58633 жыл бұрын
To much weight, it wouldn't fly
@jbird66093 жыл бұрын
Maybe, Using a high RPM generator/turbine with aluminum coil might work. High RPM generators need less copper/aluminum, Turbines are already light. Someone needs to try it. Also there is augmentation where electric motors are used for takeoff and gas used for cruise.
@SlawcioD3 жыл бұрын
@@darthmittens5863 there will by two person version, so change one spare seat for gas engine ;) and You have airprius ;)
@tihzho3 жыл бұрын
@@darthmittens5863 How much do batteries weigh?
@Math667 Жыл бұрын
1:16 that isn´t a hoverboard, it works over water....
@leffler23 жыл бұрын
Those that claim they provide a parachute, I hope that includes an ejector seat! No body could climb out fast enough!
@schrodingersgat43443 жыл бұрын
Either : A. This is hilarious! Or, B. The chute is for the entire craft. These chutes are available for many common private aircraft. You can get them for Cesnas, etc.
@guff95673 жыл бұрын
@@schrodingersgat4344 The distance to the ground is too short. Instant death
@schrodingersgat43443 жыл бұрын
@@guff9567 Ballistic Parachute. There is a charge (gas or otherwise) that deploys it. Takes very little time to deploy. It would increase survivability... ...or ,at least, allow for enough of you to survive to facilitate identification.
@guff95673 жыл бұрын
@@schrodingersgat4344 Utter rubbish.
@schrodingersgat43443 жыл бұрын
@@guff9567 The Galaxy GRS can deploy 60m up and bring a gyrocopter or light helicopter down safely. What's rubbish about that? The technology exists. How would something lite the Blackfly ,not be able to use it?
@petersummers57282 жыл бұрын
Great keep it comming
@OH-476582 жыл бұрын
Wow! So cool! I wonder if the fly zones and lanes will be defined by the metaverse once this becomes commonplace.
@cherokee43v6 Жыл бұрын
Love the first one. The builder is clearly a Miyazaki fan! That is the flying wing from Nausica and the Valley of the Wind. Miyazaki's first feature film from Studio Ghibli.
@lisapotter30522 жыл бұрын
We’ve had anti-gravity technology since 1953...
@mcmacshalfilya2 жыл бұрын
Are you related to Harry?
@shuga1245 Жыл бұрын
@@mcmacshalfilya😂
@thelastperfectman41398 ай бұрын
Fairytales
@secularsunshine90363 жыл бұрын
*A rebirth in an Ancient Tomb.* The Grand Passage Tomb is located in Ireland and was constructed over fifty-two-hundred years ago, it defines the winter solstice and celebrates a rebirth of the Sun. "Let the Sunshine In." Have a Wonderful Winter Solstice and a happy Holiday Season. E pluribus Unum.
@im_ricebowl3 жыл бұрын
the second one isn't actually real.... theres alot of videos debunking. for example, as it lifts off, the grass under it doesn't actually look like they're getting blown with air
@Uhsnuh3 жыл бұрын
Damn .. it's like you watched the video or something
@jbx.79952 жыл бұрын
I've seen some weird things in the sky's..that makes you question certain thing's, most sky-vehicle can pass as U.F.O's sometimes.. good work honestly 👍
@kidgokuxl3 жыл бұрын
They remind me of early flight contraptions of the 1900's. Back then people thought they were going to revolutionize flight with their ideas. Then things got realistic and only planes and helicopters were created. So what will come of these so called modern contraptions? Obviously something will happen.
@jw74452 жыл бұрын
Props for the sponsorships some of these got.
@georgewashington903 жыл бұрын
Spinning blades without protection can cut - kill any living creature. They need to be secured from anything getting to them but air.
@Tech_Planet3 жыл бұрын
I agree, go ducted. Battery tech also needs to make some strides The automation part should get better though it's slowly coming around.
@waynejones61443 жыл бұрын
@@Tech_Planet maybe some dilithium crystals will help, LOL!
@michaelmendillo75132 жыл бұрын
Incrediblee stuff,,,,with the right people working together these flight apparatuses will only become better and better. !!!! 🌝✌
@CyberFitzy3 жыл бұрын
Loving this movement!
@ewarda1006 ай бұрын
im sure there will be another video like this in about a 100 yrs from now and the people will still be waiting for these flying machines.
@ssssssssssss8853 жыл бұрын
Gotta love these body slicers in the hands of the naive, but confident. As for jet-packs, except fringe use cases, ridiculous contraptions. Hovering is the most inefficient form of flying.
@jamesstevens23623 жыл бұрын
I’m glad I’m not the only one that’s thinking this. They talk about “safety features” on a device that could double as a blender for anyone or anything that gets too close.
@RixtronixLAB Жыл бұрын
Nice video, thanks for sharing it :)
@Milosz_Ostrow3 жыл бұрын
As a commercially-rated rotary wing and fixed wing pilot, I wouldn't strap on or step into any of the contraptions shown in this video. Leave them to daredevils with fully vested life insurance and top-notch catastrophic health insurance.
@adamlannerd14083 жыл бұрын
Interesting that a few of them came with parachutes. Might be hard to use 50ft off the ground.
@2Tall2Step23 жыл бұрын
You’ve never flown a plane a day your life
@Milosz_Ostrow3 жыл бұрын
@@2Tall2Step2 - ... says the guy living in his parents' basement.
@heathb43193 жыл бұрын
Those things you are "rated" to fly were talked about just like you are doing here. But yet here you are.
@Milosz_Ostrow3 жыл бұрын
@@heathb4319 - If you think I'm going to apologize to you for expressing my opinion, you are mistaken.
@lawrencerust68022 жыл бұрын
Enjoyed the video. Investors keep things moving.
@gilligancharliebrown3993 жыл бұрын
I live 11 miles from my job at Edwards Air force Base. I have a backyard measuring about 3/4 of an acre of lunar terrain, easy to launch and land from. An interesting notion indeed!
@jaylittleton13 жыл бұрын
Have you yet investigated what Edwards AFB will permit for air travel as you are describing? I'm confident they have some folks that are quite proficient with their powder actuated pop-guns. If such a commute is acceptable, I suggest looking in to Para-motors.
@gilligancharliebrown3993 жыл бұрын
@@jaylittleton1 Just kidding; Id'e have a snowballs chance hell to even dream of a stunt that silly. You have a good point there.
@jaylittleton13 жыл бұрын
@@gilligancharliebrown399 They do actually make sense though, in certain circumstances and conditions.
@gilligancharliebrown3993 жыл бұрын
@@jaylittleton1 Well put and thank you. Living in the high desert area, one wishes they could just fly to the nearest...whatever (even work in most circumstances. Fortunately not for me. But everything else?; OMG!). Sure it can be affordable and quiet, but you're miles and miles from anything. Seriously!
@malachiwhite3562 жыл бұрын
I envy you--the terrain and sky out there must be something to look at.
@durisalakchannel38213 жыл бұрын
👍👍 A very extraordinary work..
@allthingsgilmour3 жыл бұрын
I'm fairly positive we'll never see ANY of these commercially. Where they are cool to watch from the ground, would you want to be strapped to one of these things going 150 knots at 600 feet and the motors stopped working? If modern aircraft has told us anything, failures happen, no matter how redundant you think your system is. Fixed wing and rotary wing aircraft are able to be landed with relative safety in case of an engine failure. None of these contraptions have that capability and will NEVER be approved by the FAA.
@DarkIzo3 жыл бұрын
well, all the copter designs are theoretically able to autorotate, but i agree with the rest always assume worst case scenario when its your life were talking about
@ninelaivz43342 жыл бұрын
Blackfly has a parachute
@Zentinel_852 жыл бұрын
Yes, emergency parachute deployment system
@StoutProper2 жыл бұрын
Doesn’t mean the military and the rich won’t use them
@Hudinie6 ай бұрын
Totally amazing I can’t wait to get one
@pastmasterdan40803 жыл бұрын
Can’t wait to see an emergency vehicle stationed at the top of high buildings for occupants to use while escaping a fire or some kind of collapse
@HasrulTanjung3 жыл бұрын
Amazing jobs big like
@raptor42393 жыл бұрын
This explains most of the modern day UFO sightings that people have been seeing.
@PatWallaby2 жыл бұрын
In my opinion, any concept that does without the lift provided by wings cannot be used for longer distances and is doomed to failure. My favorite ist the Blackfly. 1:50
@brianhiles81643 жыл бұрын
I´m amused that the intrinsic technology of drone (UAV and now piloted) vehicles in general, was and is the rate gyroscope, which was developed _not_ from fancy NASA funded technology, but from the nascent model helicopter industry. Before miniaturized ring laser (and fiber optic cable) gyros were used, there were subminiature “tuning fork“ technology gyros, and before those were electromechanical gyros designed and built to be as _inexpensive_ as possible, because no modeler would desire to spend more than, say, $100 in modern value, to include one. By the way, a tenet of modern commercial aviation is that eventually _every_ component of _every_ system of _every_ aircraft _always_ fails, which is why commercial planes have so much redundancy, (simulated) training is extensive, and flight protocol is so strict and conservative. For the military, in the example of the 80s technology of the F-16, each aircraft implements redundancy via _four_ independently “voting“ digital artificial stability control computers, each implementing a gyro, because it was quickly realized that no pilot had reflexes fast enough or had skill enough to keep it flying should this artificial stability fail. And fail it has; however, (F-16) military pilots have the option to eject from an aircraft that is (necessarily) going to crash. In light of the above, what option(s) will a civilian pilot have in these VSTOL microlights, when the inevitable occurs? Incidentally, if you are thinking, _just use an auto-deployed parachute system,_ for military jet aviation generally implementing ejection seats (with a parachute of course), these fail too, as well as being quite problematic itself. Statistics indicate that _50%_ of all low-level ejections are lethal. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24261059
@2150dalek3 жыл бұрын
Yes. Often injuries occur as well ejecting. But the alternative is death. Flying will always involve risk, even driving a car involves risk.
@rivolibioscoop3 жыл бұрын
What's the name of that board that landed in the stadion. I like simplicity and it looked cheap enough. Does anybody know what's the price.
@udxpierre3 жыл бұрын
Wonder how loud these vtol propellered crafts are. You take a small drone and it's irritating as hell.
@Multiyuppp7 ай бұрын
Jetpacks don't really need long flight time for military purposes, just need enough time to get to the enemy ship or over a barrier.
@xavierpaquin8 ай бұрын
7 new ways to die
@agravemisunderstanding96687 ай бұрын
The write brothers wouldn't have gotten anywhere if they werent prepared to risk their loves
@sexyscramblesclanton94707 ай бұрын
Why isn't Elite, Stormy, and Anita joined up together and turned into a herd of elephants?
@tntomega7 ай бұрын
Anyway its rich peoples problems
@Cosmis57 ай бұрын
Sign me up!
@ArgoPower7 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@whatdidujustsay20942 жыл бұрын
It's amazing! Let's get it on.
@nuchbutter3 жыл бұрын
None of them are survivable in the event of even a single motor failure at altitudes between 15-100 feet, I'm thinking.
@brianwest63419 ай бұрын
Depending on the terrain neither are most light planes.
@digyourmind8 ай бұрын
Wherever they are not made under any safety concerns..
@nuchbutter8 ай бұрын
@@brianwest6341 no, actually, you have a greater chance of gliding to somewhere you can survive. These other monstrosities can neither glide nor autorotate.
@rohitf1173 ай бұрын
@@brianwest6341 light planes can glide back to earth. The only issue is malfunction at low altitude. Otherwise perfectly safe if aircraft is well maintained and pilot is skilled
@Dontlookification2 жыл бұрын
Ariel racing hasn’t even begun and I’m already a huge fan.
@sid21122 жыл бұрын
Some of these look pretty viable for eventual expansion into passenger use! I think the battery technology will come up to speed in the next couple of decades, with the electric vehicle switch coming along. Imagine a seven passenger half ton cargo capacity with automated flight systems and a 4 hour battery charge with flash charging capabilities. You listening to me, Elon? Musk! Wake up! I'm talking at you!
@moretrash4you2 жыл бұрын
The battery tech is already there but ofc they won’t allow us peasants to experience it.
@choppergirl Жыл бұрын
Wow. Most of these I've already seen before, but still, wow.
@maxer1673 жыл бұрын
They are extremely dangerous and mostly will be used for certain tasks.
@heathb43193 жыл бұрын
When the horseless carriage was being developed and the start of automobiles was coming to fruition...everything was dangerous. They also thought if humans went over fifty mph their bodies would not function properly and their skin would be pulled off of their faces...even though they had experienced wind storm that were more than 50 mph. The unknown is always scary and dangerous...but look at us now. We could be even further along with development and safety aspect if governments around the world were for the people instead of for themselves and big business. As far as your certain tasks comment...there will be specialized versions as with anything...but this will catch on as soon as these few innovators and courageous people do the hard and dangerous stuff and then open the door for us average people to make them ourselves or buy them at a better price point. So yes they are extremely dangerous...to weak minded people with no drive and common sense. The bicycle, the skateboard, the motorcycle, the automobile, the plane...all dangerous if used in a dangerous way. And you have probably been on, in or operated any of those yourself. But you wouldn't have the option if these truly courageous people clearing the path for you were weak and scared. And for every idiot operating one and getting hurt or killed...there are thousands of people that operate them and are just fine. So, please learn to think strong and positive instead of weak and scared. The world will be a better place. Take care and be safe out there. The world is a lot scarier than you think...but not because of the things in this video.
@PowerOfOne-u4h3 ай бұрын
The Jetson One look like pure fun.
@drewlovelyhell48928 ай бұрын
0:05 Tell me that's not an attempt to recreate Nausicaa's glider. It's almost identical. The "Omni Hoverboard" seems incredibly dangerous. The operator just needs to lose his balance, and if he's higher than thirty feet off of the ground, it would likely be fatal. I like the idea of augmented-reality aerial race courses. They could have the cameras on the ground hooked into the system, so that people watching from home could see the track as well.
@fonwoolridge2 жыл бұрын
Excellent! Were getting close now....
@movingart45493 жыл бұрын
Nice Video!
@daruscole1586 Жыл бұрын
Could the jet pack be used somehow by military pilots as an alternative to/or in conjunction with an eject seat? You could travel pretty far away from a plane that was going down and you wouldn't usually need a parachute that may stick out like a sore thumb inviting the enemy to be there for your capture as you land with your parachute.
@eijazeshan54022 жыл бұрын
Ordered a jetson one will be ready August 23 can't wait
@randomtuberhandle2 жыл бұрын
Cool video. A funny little quirk - the 7 aircraft it covers are actually 9. I guess found 2 more late in editing.
@xander95642 жыл бұрын
Fantastic. The Omni Hoverboard and Jetson/Mark 4 seem to have the most potential. What would also be cool is a setup like Hawkman has: flapping wings, maybe attached to a vest worn by the flyer. For a human adult a wingspan of about 22 feet would needed. With today's advances in materials technology, including strong lightweight composites and ceramics, this line of development could be productive.
@ЮраСидоров-т4э2 жыл бұрын
Неэффективно. Проще приделать турбину с неподвижным крылом, как у самолёта. И технология давно знакомая и понятная и энергии несравненно меньше ест. И механизм проще, а значит надёжнее.
@jimtempleton74183 жыл бұрын
Awesome thanks ❤️
@TheGroin38 Жыл бұрын
You just forgot to talk about the best one: Franky ZAPATA' s hoverboard ! He crossed the Channel sea (35kms) between France and England in 2019, it can fly up to 200 km/h...
@carlosmcmahon6232 жыл бұрын
I loved every idea shown.
@swordguy83 жыл бұрын
The first aircraft is not wing warping. It has elevons which are actuated by the pilot rolling his body. The carriage he's laying in has ropes attached to it which go to the elevons.
@bobk1003 жыл бұрын
Great stuff! Is #4 the jet pack show in videos of the Royal Marines taking off from one boat and landing on another?