EM 61 Winding connections V2

[@Sourdough_Humboldt]

So I was correct, parallel wire for 2 connections! Sweet

[@garbizwal]

Well.... Sort of. The 2 sides seem to be connected without the parallel wire... But I think its there to help keep the neutral (WYE) balanced if that makes sense. So what I need to do with all 6 groups (3 on each side) is split them to 2 smaller groups of 15 on each side making 2 WYE connections on each side (4 total) then Add 2 balance connections separate from each other. To make sure things stay balanced. Its complicated but I think I understand it.

[@mavenhelm]

Maybe you're right about the smoke and mirrors with Huawei and the security aspects, but have you considered the security concerns valid that are voiced by companies and governments? Governments and companies have valid reasons to secure their systems from vulnerabilities. Here's why: National Sovereignty: Governments prioritize maintaining control and sovereignty over their critical infrastructure, including telecommunications networks. With Huawei's involvement, foreign entities could potentially access or control essential communication systems, raising questions about national security and protecting sensitive data. Economic Espionage: Companies face intense competition, and vulnerabilities can expose valuable intellectual property and trade secrets to theft, resulting in financial losses and damage to reputation. Privacy Protection: With vast amounts of personal data collected, vulnerabilities can lead to data breaches, identity theft, and privacy violations, harming individuals and eroding trust. Service Disruption and Cyber Attacks: System vulnerabilities can be exploited to launch cyber attacks, disrupting critical services and causing financial, operational, and societal consequences. Geopolitical Concerns: Security concerns around companies like Huawei extend beyond individual entities, raising worries about backdoors and covert surveillance capabilities that could compromise critical infrastructure, national sovereignty, and foreign relations. In conclusion, securing systems is crucial for national security, economic protection, privacy preservation, service continuity, and addressing geopolitical considerations. It's an essential aspect of today's interconnected digital world. Huawei is intentionally designed as an attack vector for hackers.

[@garbizwal]

This whole thing started when Huawei refused to hard embed a chip set for the US government to have full access to their products. Its no coincidence. The pot calling the kettle black. Honestly I fear China spying on me much less then the USA. So going one step further do you think USA should be doing all the things you listed for products/people in other countries?

[@mavenhelm]

@@garbizwal Huawei's involvement and the resulting concerns from governments are complex, varying per country based on national security considerations. The dispute started over product access but evolved to encompass broader security worries. Each nation has unique security priorities, necessitating actions to protect national interests, infrastructure, and citizen safety and privacy, dependent on their risk assessments and geopolitical dynamics. However, these measures should also ensure transparency, accountability, and privacy rights, balancing security and individual rights. International dialogue on security standards, information sharing, and best practices can address global concerns while respecting sovereignty and privacy. Governments must build trust and formulate mutually beneficial solutions through these discussions. In sum, every nation's approach should balance security measures with protecting individual rights domestically and internationally.

[@garbizwal]

@@mavenhelm I have a big problem believing the official storey! Especially when the pentagon is missing how much money EVERY FRICKEN YEAR? Us tax payers are paying for money to go unaccounted for and straight up missing. And you are trying to tell me the US are the good guys? The US only knows how to war monger around the world. Yes what I have seen (who knows how much of which is true) about China looks like the CCP is a dirty corrupt POS. But I can't sit here and think anyone working in any level of US government is actually trying to do good for the world! I don't want anyone to have any of the data from my stuff. But I am actually more worried about the US having all my Data than China!