The big difference may be that these two made their moves so openly.
@traceyholt82239 ай бұрын
It was "open" as the women took the surname of their new partners but hadn't officially married them. Divorces were had to do in those times and many left unhappy marriages and bigamy was abundant (but also illegal). Living and having children with a person you aren't married to was frowned up.
@traceyholt82239 ай бұрын
Interesting - James' and Helena's daughter Lillie was born abt 1866. (5 years old on the 1971 census). Mary Ann's and Joseph's daughter Mary was born July 1967 - so after Lillie. You couldn't divorce easily in those times and it was expensive to do so. Many people left unhappy marriages and "married" another person (not officially) and moved on. I can imagine that this is what may have happened with these two, especially after bankruptcy and financial issues. The most interesting fact is that the children stayed with James (the father), when there's a history of the mother getting custody.
@ruthking78849 ай бұрын
Could be because she had no way to generate income to care for them...and it could be, it is hard to pass yourself off as single if you have a bunch of kids to spill the beans. Her second "husband" may not have known. It is hard to say. It could be any number of scenarios.
@traceyholt82239 ай бұрын
@@ruthking7884 Agreed - just found it interesting.
@lynnhubbard8449 ай бұрын
no intro? Just plopped us in somewhere...
@avrilpeters59009 ай бұрын
Emma is an amazing lady I loved would you call it a show of a documentary I'm not sure working and training to be a care assistant like her mum used to do.