Enemy At The Gates: A war fight in the middle of the city

In Stalingrad, Vasily Zaitsev (Jude Law), is forced into a deadly charge. Without a rifle, Vasily has no other choice but to try to steal a gun from one of the many dead soldiers.
BINGE MORE: bit.ly/3D54pZR
Credits: © 2001 Paramount Pictures, Enemy at the gates.
AVAILABLE FOR RENT OR BUY ENEMY AT THE GATES: amzn.to/3BFxmKw
#BingeSociety #EnemyAtTheGates #WWII
Subscribe: bit.ly/3aVlqJm
BINGE MORE:
The Fast & The Furious Tokyo Drift - Winner gets me: bit.ly/3b3Dstn
Minions - The Ultimate weapon: bit.ly/3DUX5QK
Anaconda - Live bait: bit.ly/3aNFE7V
Ghost Rider -Jail fight: bit.ly/3lQC6bi
The Grudge 3 - The wrong make-out spot: bit.ly/3n2a8Zz
Child’s Play 2 - I will kill you!: bit.ly/3lRc6N5
Equalizer 2 - Two kinds of pain: bit.ly/3vphmdO
ABOUT BINGE SOCIETY:
Featuring the BEST lines, the BEST characters, and the MOST famous actors. Here you’ll find the top entertainment content any movie lover would desire. Binge Society brings you not only iconic movie scenes but also our own original shows so… Cancel your plans, make some popcorn and sit back to get ready to binge with us!
FOLLOW BINGE SOCIETY
Facebook: / bingesociety
Instagram: / binge_society
TikTok: / bingesociety
Twitter: / binge_society

[@simonthomas5367]

No mercy for cowards, they shouted, bravely hiding behind their cosy barricade.

[@CrniWuk]

Just to be clear, I really love this movie. But this scene, or well many things you see in the movie are not historically accurate. The practise you see in this scene was not common in the Red Army. While there have been cases where retreat was seen as betrayal this policy was quickly droped during the war. Because even the Soviet leadership learned eventually, you can not win a war that way.

[@spartangobbles]

This scene tries to say that the Soviets were trying to lose the war

[@CrniWuk]

@@spartangobbles No it doesn't. The Soviets didn't try to lose the war. It's simply put the issue that the Soviet army was in a very difficult situation after the purges instigated by Stalin during the 1920s. They lacked many experienced commanders and generals. Often they have been replaced by politically and ideologically driven chracters without any military experience what so ever. Infact even the idea of modernising the Soviet army could get you in trouble because it was seen as western ideology. However as the war against the Germans became critical the Soviet Leadership including Stalin realised they had to change their strategy. The situation was so dire that even officers which have been send to a Gulag in the 1930s got back in service to fight the Germans. The fact that the average age of the Soviet commanders was also 20 years lower compared to the Germans probably made a difference as well because they had sich high losses. A lot of young people with new ideas came in to the Red Army. There have been major improvements and changes within the Soviet army and Leadership after 1942.

[@kr-sd3ni]

@@spartangobbles no, this scene is telling to the next wave that there will be no returning back

[@spartangobbles]

@@CrniWuk I dont even know where to start with this comment, Those so called experienced commanders got their arses handed to them in previous wars and were actively working against the Soviets which is why they were purged, purged meaning removed from their position, not necessarily killed. What you said about modernization is just outright nonsense, the whole reason for the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was to buy time to develop for the incoming Nazi invasion. Stalin himself said that the Soviets were 50 to 100 years behind the advanced countries, its either they catch up in 10 years or they will be crushed. They went on to do so and won the war.

[@sXMrSnapzZ]

Fun fact: my uncle is the taller Russian officer, Dan Van Husen, he died last year due to covid. This popping up on my reccomended put a sad smile on my face, miss you uncle Dan 🥲

[@stevepirie8130]

Was acting great there

[@sXMrSnapzZ]

@@stevepirie8130 😊

[@aaronrodden8121]

Fun fact, EVERY death last year was due to "covid", you have to be more specific! 😆

[@aaronrodden8121]

That is pretty cool though, all politics aside!

[@sXMrSnapzZ]

@@aaronrodden8121 as in he got covid and it killed him, didn't think I'd have to explain that one

[@lestat1591]

1:12 I love how that German soldier is just laying down and chilling like that with little to no protection during a battle.

[@MaxVerhaag]

and being all relaxed about his mp40 jamming...i would be shitting my pants if i were in his place...

[@Gilopflor]

Camera man running 0:42 right side of the screen blue jacket lol

[@itbelikethat-]

wow lmao

[@zang9147]

This scene makes me think of a couple of companies I worked for and the management.

[@valROFL]

0:41 even the cameraman is joining the fight for the motherland!

[@CrazedAussie96]

JUST SAW THAT WTF

[@chihuahua3892]

A testament to how trash this movie is.

[@Kalopsia666]

What shot? I don’t see it.

[@dalbirdanlag2503]

@@Kalopsia666 Start at 41 seconds but slow playback down to 0.25. Right at 42 seconds you will see the steady cam operator enter/get caught in the scene on the right side of the screen. It last through to the 43 seconds mark.

[@madapakakapadam]

@@dalbirdanlag2503 lol

[@alexchristopher221]

I watched this movie in a cineplex theatre in Hofu, Japan when it came out and had the auditorium all to myself. The screen and sound system were awesome.

[@heroicaknight4735]

Soviet soldiers: Fall back Me, who played Call of Duty 1: Well, those commissars are about to get some good target practice.

[@seanhuds229]

With friends like Commisars, who needs enemies? I noticed they reused some of the initial attack deaths for the deaths during the retreat.

[@neilpemberton5523]

Stalin eventually revoked the Commissars' powers over Red Army commanders. The Commissars were shocked to discover how hated they were by professional officers!

[@alexchristopher221]

Budget concerns, I suppose.

[@heroicaknight4735]

I noticed some of the repeats, too. Especially the guy who has his hand up by his ear as he goes down.

[@JohnyZman]

Hey it’s Bahkmut!!!

[@trafficthetrainlover]

Comparing both side tactics: Germans use sandbags and just like a trench while soviets are charging like waterloo or something

[@catlikepizzagaming8280]

It’s called attrition, the Germans could not reinforce quicker than the soviets killed them and Stalin couldn’t have cared less about his people

[@fal2218]

@@catlikepizzagaming8280 source: your years of experience as the most famous historian on youtube

[@Latrine1999]

@@catlikepizzagaming8280 Soviets while in many instances did use numerical superiority it was nothing like this movie, specially seeing Russians were running low on men by 1942, there was no red square charge like this and after Kursk they started putting Quality over numbers. That being said waves were used when casualties were not expected to be super high as their doctrine was a reverse blitzkrieg, while the blitzkrieg consists of attacking soft spots with tanks and sending infantry behind enemy lines, the Soviet deep battle consisted of breaking soft spots with infantry and then sending quicker tanks behind enemy lines to attack supply depots/routes or the weaker sides of enemy defenses. That being said neither can be done in this scenario as they don't have an armored regiment nor seem to be a soft spot, thus this charge wouldn't have happened

[@robisfantasticutube]

Yeah this film isn't exactly realistic 🐱

[@amfarrell42]

This movie is not historically accurate.

[@Momo2804.]

Suddenly they possess automatic weapons in the back. Where were they when the assault began?

[@freakyfishguy1692]

They had them the whole time. They are too costly to lose in battle though.

[@MaxVerhaag]

think they are used to represent NKVD blocking detachments to prevent their main line of troops from retreating....and well it worked....sort of...:P

[@shepherdlavellen3301]

Seriously if anyone wants a good movie about Stalingrad, Stalingrad 1993 is a much better option than this

[@stevepirie8130]

That was a brutal film from the other perspective

[@kennethbowers2897]

This movie is more of a fantasy film with a historical aspect to it, obviously none of what this movie portrays actually happened as far as the two individuals having a sniper duel.

[@seanhuds229]

I had the VHS with English dubbed, still good but german language with subtitles is better, the acting sounds less clanky.

[@MotoMaximus]

Seeing the war from the Nazi perspective? No thanks! It’s like watching a sad story of ISIS terrorists

[@user-bd7hw9wv8w]

history again

[@jamesdunning8650]

This scene is half true. If you were assigned to a penal unit the following info applies. "As a result, with nowhere else to go, the penal battalions usually advanced in a frenzy, running forwards until they were killed by enemy minefields, artillery, or heavy machine-gun fire. If the men survived and occupied their objective, they were rounded up and used again in the next assault." So the running crazy at the enemy is plausible, getting gunned down by your own Russian men, probably not. But you WOULD face summary execution.

[@MustangGT-jb6qr]

Actually getting gunned down by your own men is entirely plausible and they were called barrier troops. They weren’t used often, but enough that this is still true. Especially for penal battalions like you said.

[@alexchristopher221]

I wouldn't have run back but head left or right. Screw Communism.

[@thomasgoodger6291]

most millitary powers were all for shooting their own men rampartly when ww1 rolled round. but by the second world war most of them even russia were mostly against shooting their own men as it was such a finite resource still recovering from all the dead since the first world war.

[@makingwaves1239]

Cowards? Hah, they could get up from that cosy machine gun position of theirs and do the dirty work themself ...

[@peterfrancis3136]

They brought the machine gun to kill their own instead of putting on the front line to kill the enemy.

[@congettoinzauro4860]

I love this movie

[@pbdye1607]

This is historically inaccurate. While cowards and deserters were indeed shot in the Red Army, more often than not they were sent to "penal battalions" where the life expectancy was about as low as shown here.

[@materialdialectics]

Well the penal battalions is where the whole shooting those who retreat thing comes from, but regular army didn't do that. I'm also pretty sure the whole only giving a gun to every other guy thing is nonsense too.

[@oledahammer8393]

@@materialdialectics No it is not. The Chinese did that as well in the Korean War. My Uncle was a Sergeant of a machine crew there in the hill battles. He said only about one out of three Chinese had a gun when they charged their positions, if someone died with a gun, someone without one picked it up. He said they shot the Chinese until they ran out of water to cool the machine guns and had to pee in the coolant tanks to keep the barrels from melting or they would overrun. First-hand account! I'm sure the Godless Communist Russians were no different.

[@Latrine1999]

Also order 227 was directed towards officers and squad leaders, not grunts

[@Latrine1999]

@@oledahammer8393 idk what he saw in Asia, but it is nonsense if we are talking about the Eastern Front of WW2 as there's no historical record of that and by the time the battle of Stalingrad started the Soviet army was supplied adequately

[@Tap02]

@@Latrine1999 it’s not nonsense…this is 1941-1942. The red army was almost beaten and getting supplies into Stalingrad was treacherous. Most conscripts did not have adequate anything, including food. They ate rats at times. There were certain divisions at the time that were adequately supplied, like the Serbian division.

[@rogerrogers7393]

2.34 to 2.42 i like that music the way it sounds

[@VamooseRooter1]

DTA Thanks

[@shadowthoughts7959]

This scene of pure idiocy is exactly a reason to shoot an officer. When they are giving orders like these, just remember how outnumbered and outgunned they are.

[@jamestaylor5341]

You can't give up territory for ever. Maybe this offensive was part of a larger operational plan. It was pretty badly planned though.

[@invisibleman4827]

If the Soviets fought like this at Stalingrad they would've lost.

[@invisibleman4827]

@@paras1176 Oh there's some truth to what you say - the Soviets lost more troops in the battle of Moscow than the Nazis and still won, but the barrier troops would be more likely to just shove people back into combat rather than just wasting bullets when there seems to be no other defences. Not saying that this didn't happen, but a broad daylight charge across a square with half the troops unarmed and no officers, surviving Stalingrad veterans weren't impressed.

[@invisibleman4827]

@@paras1176 Funny you say that the German army supply lines were overstretched when they went too far and too fast because that's also what did for them on the Western Front in the First World War. 1914 they lost the Battle of the Marne when the French and British stopped their advance and drove them back, same in 1918 at the Battle of Amiens, losing the Germans four miles in one day, and starting the 100 days offensive that sent them almost back into Germany.

[@invisibleman4827]

@@paras1176 Right, just to be clear I don't mean 'funny' as in amusing or hilarious or "makes me laugh" kind of way. I mean "funny" as in "strange" because what you told me reminded me of what I'd learned about the 1914-1918 war, and I was surprised by history repeating itself a third time. Hope that clears that up. I'm sorry to hear about what your great uncle went through - that sounds terrifying. My granddad was a veteran of the same war albeit in a different army and theatre of conflict.

[@m7ray]

@@paras1176 Your story is hilarious. The "movie" is fiction.

[@ivantysyn2]

@@paras1176 Actually Germans had numerical superiority in the initial stages of the Stalingrad battle. Later Russians achieved a slight numerical advantage. When it comes to weapons, Russian soldiers were at the time of battle very well equipped with more of everything compared to Wehrmacht. The movie is an utter nonse.

[@thedungeondelver]

Don't turn around/oh-oh-ho/der komissar's in town/wah-oh-oh!

[@Sahilprakash1999]

0:47,1:16 MG-42 and MG-34 does sound like that

[@user-nh6vu3qr7b]

The mg42 was a hell of a gun in ww2

[@trisblackshaw1640]

A 'war fight'? So.... you mean...a... battle?

[@sorrimachi]

パッと見、小峠さん

[@collin1401]

Every Russian solder were already armed when the battle has started. It was the volunteers who were poorly aquept and lead.

[@Gallboynarossan]

A war fight? Did you mean a battle?

[@mariadelcarmenmartinezsant9482]

Reproductor DVD Panasonic DVDs27. Control remoto. Año 2004.

[@BDNeon]

Ah yes, the "war fight" of Stalingrad, a pivotal moment in World shooting-combat-thingy 2.

[@KlassischLiberal]

My grandfather fought on the German side. He had great respect for the bravery of the Russians. But he did not understand why they were used so inhumanely. The Russian soldiers had the enemy in front of and behind them.

[@ChrisStavros]

Fighting the armies of a genocidal maniac so that another genocidal maniac can keep killing millions of Russians at home. Now that's soldiering.

[@Latrine1999]

Your grandpa was fed a lot of propaganda that claimed the Russians only used wave tactics, which is not surprising, Goebbels was great at lying, Russians would only use them against soft spots to send the tanks behind enemy lines

[@KlassischLiberal]

@@Latrine1999 My grandfather was at the front and saw how the Russian soldiers came running towards them shouting "uräääää". With no chance of breaking through. Of course, your own experience depends on the time and place, but that doesn't change the fact that such a form of warfare is a waste of human life.

[@Latrine1999]

@@KlassischLiberal That type of charge was not only quite rare, but excluded to Penal battalions, so yes, he was fed propaganda if he thought every Soviet division was like that

[@KlassischLiberal]

@@Latrine1999 Well, as I said, he was there, he experienced it. And not just him, but I spoke to at least a dozen veterans who had experienced it in one way or another. However, especially in the 1941 encirclements.

[@rickythomas128]

How could they just shoot their own people like that!!??

[@Alex_Translator]

The first "wise guy" wrote a fairy tale, the second made a movie, the third distributes.

[@user-ox5rq8wc3o]

25/55 Enemy At The Gates: A war fight in the middle of the city

[@Mocking69]

Let's stop the war=3

[@SDarklighter]

Can someone reminds me the meaning of such tactics?

[@peterisawesomeplease]

Ehh its a bit unrealistic in a direct sense but is trying to get a point across. At this point in the war the soviets were not doing suicide charges into the enemy very often. But the point is to show the relative lack of ability of new recruits and especially officers in the red army compared to better trained, led, and experienced nazi troops.

[@SDarklighter]

@@peterisawesomeplease I see, thanks

[@freakyflow]

@@peterisawesomeplease It portrays a realistic view of Russia with it's vast amount of men But lack of trainning And more still the equipment needed to fight And the well armed And trainned German soilder with his armor As they had done so across europe. The history books prove this ..The pact with German not to invade And the cry of help to America And England for supplies And weapons Once Hitler attacked anyways ...It was the loss of supplies And weapons to the German soldier during распу́тица ( Rasputitsa ) weather And the coming winter that took it's toll on the fight Russia did infact have many small arms But lacked Air support in numbers Tank were across the land What the Russians were use to was Cold weather...

[@peterisawesomeplease]

@@freakyflow Good info about the equipment. Yea I think the scene would have been better if it used something like lack of air support to show why the Russians were having a hard time. But also might have been difficult to portray on film. Because yea although there were a few instances of Russian troops not having enough small arms it was a pretty rare thing to have happen.

[@geraldmiller8973]

stalin had prisoners walk through mine fields before regular troops. stalin wanted victories and he did not care how he got them. after the war he starved millions of russians to death. he was not a nice guy.

[@duane356]

arm chair general here: Why wouldn't the assault group dump a bunch of smoke on the streets for cover??

[@elsemorris906]

Because the soviets were animals who considered their soldiers little more than disposable "cannon fodder" You'll notice many of the Russian soldiers didn't even have guns. Socialism sucks.

[@attackanddestroy]

This is a movie and not reality.

[@attackanddestroy]

@@elsemorris906 They never sent in unarmed soldiers during the battle of Stalingrad. There are reports from early in the war of Russian soldiers be under equipped, but by the time of Stalingrad, most soldiers were well supplied. And you're blanket "socialism sucks" comment to refer to the Soviets at this time is ridiculous at best.

[@elsemorris906]

@@attackanddestroy Do you understand they are portraying the soviet army this way purposely?

[@attackanddestroy]

@@elsemorris906 Ya. It's a movie, not reality. Do some research on the battle.

[@mariadelcarmenmartinezsant9482]

Películas es para mí novia Susana Hernández ♥️.

[@kevinspilker6622]

"A War Fight". Or, y'know, 'battle', if you want to be specific.

[@policepolice3266]

MOVIE TITLE:...... ?

[@xfire7]

Brilliant portraual of communism .

[@Sahilprakash1999]

URA

[@MrNintoku]

What a waste of ammunition and men. How did they even win

[@rgzas7071]

Pure quantity.

[@johnnylinfield3809]

How can you do that to your own men ... it doesn’t even make sense

[@mardiffv.8775]

Stalin starved milion of Ukranians in the 1930's, the Holomodor. And Stalin send milions of Russians and other peoples to Gulags or have them shot. The NKVD had quotas of enemies of the state to fill. So WW2 was business as useal for Stalin.

[@bundabunda7774]

because its a film, not a reality

[@chaosacsend9653]

@@bundabunda7774 order 227 very much a reality

[@bundabunda7774]

@@chaosacsend9653 yeah, but there is nowhere said that everyone has to be shot, they were usually sent to penal batalions, according to what we know.

[@mooneychan]

@@chaosacsend9653 Ah, famous order 227. Did you read it? Also, just wondering. Let's say you're in the US military... And you retreated without approval of your superiors. Hooray, you've saved your company, but the rest of your battalion got outflanked and destroyed. What consequences do you face? A promotion?

[@kallekonttinen1738]

This is only scene in this movie that I think is a bit unrealistic. MG's and SMG's would have been supporting attack. Placing them only for firing retiring troops is unrealistic. Somebody might have gotten shot with pistol or firing squad afterwards but automatics would have been firing Germans..

[@kugellehr]

fun fact, the soviets executed some 60,000 of their own men in stalingrad for desertion or cowardice. The germans are estimated to have executed 10-20,000 of their own men during the course of the entire war for the same thing.

[@user-gd2ft5er8u]

Please link! Or did you lie?

[@kugellehr]

@@user-gd2ft5er8u whats the point of lying about historical fact? The Communists had much to hide. The two organs of state control, SMERSH and NKVD, executed 158,000 soldiers for desertion during the war and jailed 135,056 Red Army officers, mostly after the war, because they had become too independent. A further 1.5 million Red Army soldiers captured by the Germans were sent to gulags or Siberian work camps simply because they had been tainted by contact with the West. Source: “The Stalingrad Epic” (rus) p.236 -> FSB Russian Federation Central Archive, fund 14, register 4, case 386, pages 22-24

[@daniko4447]

that's what the communism can do (i'm not sure)

[@bundabunda7774]

@@kugellehr yeah, sure, now provide the link for the 60 000 executed in stalingrad please, i am calling big bullshit on that.

[@jenshavla4673]

And your point is with this comment? That German war machine was immensly more humane or what lol

[@Generallove1122]

这段把我看的想哭，苏联人真狠啊，对自己人这么无情和残酷

[@tomxaider2058]

In real life, those machine guns were used to provide cover fire not shooting retreating troops

[@Kons213]

but nobody in america or europe cares about such details, they think bs in this movie is actual history lol

[@Bill308A10]

Stalin did his fair share of in-house killings during this war. Probably not how the film showed. After Stalin purged the army of almost all competent leaders there really wasn’t many professional military officers to lead correctly during the beginning battle Stalingrad.

[@slicex3408]

@@Kons213 You obviously have been brainwashed by communist propaganda.

[@flisko123]

no mery for cowards while he is hiding at the back

[@rgzas7071]

Similar shit today in Ukraine. Russian generals have always treated their soldiers as "consumables".

[@Sahilprakash1999]

2:01 Commissar: NO MERCY THE COWARDS

[@kadrick4446]

Inacurrate as fuck. But it's Hollywood.

[@anteradeljic5315]

So who is the enemy at the gates??? Germans or Stalin ??

[@pwade8080]

A War Fight? What drivel is that.

[@hypeddino1913]

Couldn't the Russians have run towards the sides??

[@fuggetaboutit5153]

Charging straight into the line of fire is easily the worst battle strategy executed by the United States army

[@Warrior48]

!!

[@sounavailable]

I think they should've named this movie: "Sniper - Warhammer 40k". The kind bs depicted here practically never happened

[@mintyfreshbreath3945]

coming soon to america.

[@gianlucacatani6200]

Poveracci

[@koukimonzta]

This movie was filmed in Germany and most of the extras including the russians were Germans

[@PeterMasalski93]

wow footage of russians in ukraine 2022

[@tomjackjack960]

Russian soldats only have two options,one is do meaningless suicide attacks against Ukraine forces,or get mowed down by their fellow Russian if they try to back up. it's quite pathetic I assure you.

[@greenworld6743]

Metaverse Starlink coin buy ok ok ok

[@alexcronin41]

A lot of people truly believe it is a realistic depiction of eastern front. Alas, it is slightly more realistic than Batman movies.

[@BulgakovSS]

Losses of Germany on the eastern front: 5 million. Losses of the USSR 25 million.

[@syedhassany9683]

@@BulgakovSS 27 million is the number of civilians and soldiers. About 8.5 million of whom were soldiers. Additionally many of these were pow deaths, as a staggering 40% of Soviet pows were executed or starved to death by the Germans. Post suprise invasion, the Soviets were inflicting roughly equal casualties as the Germans, especially when we account for the fact that the Germans and Soviets measured casualties differently.

[@BulgakovSS]

@@syedhassany9683 You give the official statistics approved by the Communist Party. Just don't take into account the real state of affairs. In Ukraine, according to the census, the difference between the number of inhabitants before and after the war is 10,000,000 people. And these are only official sources. For example more than half of the male population of my grandmother in the village died in the war. Let's also take into account the fact that most of the rural population was not taken into account at all in the losses, since they were not considered at all as existing as people. Until 1977, villagers did not even have an identity card and did not have the right to leave their village under the threat of being shot. A significant part of the documents on the death toll was classified. These documents are classified to this day. Also, not so long ago, Putin in the Russian Federation extended the secrecy of the KGB and NKVD documents relating to the losses of the WWII times for another 50 years. Other researchers who conducted a study of this issue on the archives located in the Russian Federation cite a figure of 35 million. But he cannot officially give such an assessment at the state level. The reason is simple: it goes against the policy of the Russian Federation and equates to treason.

[@niceyoureadmycomment323]

@@BulgakovSS You forget Eastern Axis countries and Italy

[@anamericanman]

Wouldn't it have been better to be silent and not carry a flag?

[@matthewjohnson3656]

Not really. When charges have happened in history it’s best to get the blood pumping in your men. Screaming and flag waving is a great way to induce mob mentality where people are more likely to look forward than to the sides or back. Because if you start doubting yourself or your army, morale collapses. That being said, this type of tactic in WW 2 was really rare for the Russians. They were cruel and incompetent a lot of the time but they weren’t stupid.

[@FordFalcon1962nBlue]

russians- well bring in a mini gun- but we'll use it on our own men and not the germans-

[@sevagusk9589]

Совок тока так и воевал

[@dmitrymishunin1763]

This movie has nothing to do with real life

[@rabiealkurba2520]

Did you fight in ww2?

[@dmitrymishunin1763]

@@rabiealkurba2520 my grandparents and other relatives did

[@if6was985]

@@dmitrymishunin1763 as did my grandparents and other relatives, my wife's grandfather was one of the liberators of Belsen Bergan concentration camp. One of my grandfather's fought from D-day all the way to Berlin, but you Russians really did have it bad, Stalin was a vile man.

[@dmitrymishunin1763]

@@if6was985 just don't believe these movies. Thats all slander. These actors dont look like russians, they dont act like russians. The only truth of that movie is that it was a war in Stalingrad

[@dmitrymishunin1763]

@Manero that film was much better. There is also a book of Vasilii Zaitsev in person that maybe one can read to know more about that war

[@ADobbin1]

This is a good way to wipe out your own army rather than the enemies. Somehow I doubt this is real.

[@AaAMikeAaA1]

It's well documented. Part of the reason the red army had the most casualties of WW2. They often just threw bodies to the front.

[@syedhassany9683]

@@AaAMikeAaA1 it’s quite well documented that the exact opposite occurred. The soviets had the most casualties because they suffered the largest war in human existence. The whole half of them didn’t have guns is bullshit as well, that was a characteristic of the Russian army in WW1. You’re getting this account from Nazi generals who wrote shit like this in their memoirs to cope for the fact they got beat. Any army that tries the tactics showed on screen here will lose every engagement, that’s why this is such horseshit.

[@gRosh08]

I'm sorry, but You don't understand... I'm just not happy until I see the DISLIKE COUNTER! Blah, blah, blah... I want to know! The Algorithm has you all in its grasp! Game over!

[@czerwonazaraza1005]

Mongols

[@unguelootay8589]

When did the Russians become English?

[@Suojeluninja]

This isn't historically correct. While they did send soldiers into battle without guns they were given some weapons like some had handgrenades and bolt cutters as sort of makeshift sappers. If nothing else they were given a shovel.

[@obi-wankenobi5332]

😂

[@imaneblaze]

What good does it do the soviet army to killtheir own retreating soldiers?? This scene makes my blood boil. Smh.

[@cholodelrosari0543]

*leaked footage of russian forces on bakhmut, ukraine 2022*

[@gustavomeola911]

Alemania perdió la guerra...............porqué se quedó sin municiones.!!!!!!🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[@xxcodyv2]

USA has a clown in office

[@FacemanGaming108]

Why was the USSR dissolved? Because it had US in the title.

[@mardiffv.8775]

The USSR was the old Russian empire under communist rule. So many nations did not want to be in the USSR, but they wanted to become independent. USSR = Union of Soviet (council) Socialist Republics. There were 15 Soviet Republics. Soviets soldiers joked that the GDR was the 16th Soviet Republic, because those Germans were so loyal to Moscow.

[@FacemanGaming108]

@@mardiffv.8775 dude it's a joke. I dont need some history class.

[@user-mn6ik7dj1t]

Дедываевали гребаный стыд

[@nkt0811]

if only these Russian soldiers be like Imperial Japanese soldiers use Banzai Charge...

[@user-ne1hs3bv2z]

Sinnloses anrennen

[@user-nv4id1hq2t]

пиздец. бесконечно "правдивая правда". по секретным документам, надо полагать

[@BulgakovSS]

А самому слабо поискать в нете воспоминания красноармейцев?

[@hughjarse3808]

One vile system fighting another.

[@azaliahmad458]

yup when i watch this idk who to root for. but if i have to choose i would not root for the nazi.

[@i.s1134]

NAZI - national SOCIALIST workers front USSR - united soviet SOCIALIST republics Same systems.

[@jenshavla4673]

@@i.s1134 yes, only one based on race ideology and other on class ideology

[@i.s1134]

@@jenshavla4673 class ideology that is based on race, I know because I grew up in the soviet union, and that is the way it was.

[@adamcarreras-neal4697]

@@i.s1134 neither of which were SOCIALIST. learn the difference, I'd thought less ignorance from one claiming to have grown up there.

[@ryanmarquez9404]

The Germans didn't lose the Russian beat them and beat them back to their own capital.

[@eagle7757]

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him shall not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16, Ephesians 2:8-9, Romans 4:5, Jesus Christ is the only way, KJV....

[@Lao_tzu5789]

Well. Heh. In Russia human isn't human, only cannon fodder.

[@user-ug9jd7rk3k]

Господи, Ну какой же бред... Большевики были жестокими, но они не были дураками, чтобы солдат без оружия на пулеметы посылать

[@JimLahey_and_Blulian]

That sounds like soviet propoganda.

[@m7ray]

@@JimLahey_and_Blulian you sound like an ineducable nazi fanboy.

[@user-ug9jd7rk3k]

@@JimLahey_and_Blulian что именно похоже на пропаганду?

[@user-kz9cp2nt7n]

ХЗ я там не был, но штрафников в теории могли запросто отправить.

[@user-li7mx8hu2w]

@@user-kz9cp2nt7n у меня родственник там был, когда он рассказывал про этот ужас и груды замерзших тел, он плакал. Но ничего подобного из того что показывали в этом видео он не рассказывал. Так же я в 1986 году разговаривал с ветеранами, они тоже таких глупостей не рассказывали, никого никогда без оружия в атаку не послали

[@Son_of_Mandalore]

My favourite scene in the whole film... Makes you realise that Stalin was just as evil as Hitler and that history is written by the victor. The war crimes of the Russians equalled those of the Nazis, it's just a pity they didn't wipe each other out. Senseless waste of life

[@user-yo7tp6rh1r]

Ты реально думаешь что наши деды так воевали? 🤣🤣🤣 А если бы Гитлер победил ты был мыл сортир в доме у немецкого хозяина и считал бы это престижной работой. Сталин спас мир, но его оболгали в в том числе такими мусорными фильмами.

[@Son_of_Mandalore]

@@user-yo7tp6rh1r how ironic... Not brave enough to respond in English! It seems cowardice is systemic in mother Russia! Must be a genetic thing. Well done, coward. 😂 🤣 😂

[@user-yo7tp6rh1r]

Для дурней пояснение, если ты не понимаешь что я пишу, то есть два варианта. Первый - выучить русский(тебе не подойдёт, ты слишком тупой для этого языка), второй - нажать на "перевести". Не благодари🤣🤣🤣

[@Alex_Translator]

@@user-yo7tp6rh1r Не мечите бисер перед свиньями. Мальчик в нарративном рабстве. Что вбили в тупую башку, то и видит. Факты, выбивающиеся из "стройной теории", игнорирует. Ничего страшного. Повзрослеет - поумнеет. Не поумнеет - жизнь накажет.

[@filmflim]

The incredible depth of historical research that went into making this movie, such as how the Red Army was comprised mostly of Brits! Who ever knew?!

[@hwdprtn7670]

And the German sniper speaks perfect American English.

[@stefanthorpenberg887]

In Anthony Beevor’s fact based book ”Stalingrad” nothing is said about Soviet soldiers attacking the Nazis unarmed, or that the Red Army shot down their own. It’s US propaganda on lowest cold war level. Instead Beevor’s book shows interviews with young Soviet soldiers who says they were surprised over the open political discussions in the trenches. According to Beevor the older Soviet soldiers often said that ”first they had to take down the Nazis, then they should take care of their own government”.

[@naight9409]

One of the most stupid film I ever seen.

[@theduke2778]

Yep

[@bman6065]

I don't know there's a few others. Company of Heroes or any new Russian movie with obnoxious over done CGI slow motion action sequences.

[@jamesdunning8650]

It's actually one of the many peoples favorite movies.

[@m7ray]

@@jamesdunning8650 favorite movie of nazi fanboys.

[@jamesdunning8650]

@@m7ray yeah, where the soviets won... back to your hole troll.

[@pointly]

Very inaccurate

[@maxwellcrazycat9204]

Sad how the Soviets used poorly trained and equipped peasantry to soften up the German defenses. It's no wonder why their casualties were so high.

[@spartangobbles]

actually the Soviet to Axis casualties were not much different, It's just the Axis count the deaths in a different manner. the real death ratio was 1-1.3

[@caolangordon8167]

They didn’t, this film is very inaccurate

[@user-podorognik]

Че за хрень в этом дерьмище?!!! Это может в Америке по свистку как собаки в атаку поднимаются, а в красной армии командир кричал: в атаку вперёд!!!!

[@obi-wankenobi5332]

😂

[@gooderlinsen]

This scene makes me think of incompetent Biden administration