Having watched this video, i started loving grammar❤
@rangareddysireddy3 ай бұрын
You did very nice sir, thank you very much
@iamrahulraj1919Ай бұрын
Having known your impeccable competence as an English teacher, I repeatedly visit your channel for learning English.
@EnglishWithAshishАй бұрын
Thank you for such kind and encouraging words, Rahul!
@alihatamikia66292 жыл бұрын
Having watched this video, I really enjoyed your teaching.
@EnglishWithAshish2 жыл бұрын
Happy to know!
@HASSAnBabufaci6 ай бұрын
Having watched your videos I started praying for you
@dhruvbiswas57714 ай бұрын
Bro chill 💀
@subhamitasen31358 ай бұрын
Thank you, Sir. You are my saviour.
@EnglishWithAshish7 ай бұрын
💗
@ramasaresingh22602 жыл бұрын
Very clear cut explanation my dear . I a retired lecturer am fully satisfied with your video on perfect participle active and passive construction. Thaks.
@EnglishWithAshish2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the encouraging words, sir!
@johnroberts7529 Жыл бұрын
What an excellent, clear and compact lesson; thank you very much for all that work. 👍
@EnglishWithAshish Жыл бұрын
You're very welcome John. Glad you liked it.
@i.krahman92723 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this awesome video..👍
@EnglishWithAshish3 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it, Rahman! 🌸
@balwinderkaurbomrah16772 жыл бұрын
Having been appricated ,i felt happy.
@EnglishWithAshish2 жыл бұрын
👏
@jayaram17854 жыл бұрын
Best videos on English
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the kind words!
@karzanrouf4413 жыл бұрын
Well done very useful
@EnglishWithAshish3 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it! 🙏
@Hamdan-c3i8 ай бұрын
Having watched this video,i started to love grammar
@EnglishWithAshish8 ай бұрын
Great!
@muhammadyounas74212 жыл бұрын
Respected Sir. 😊❤️Your teaching of method is very interesting and easy.
@EnglishWithAshish2 жыл бұрын
Glad you find it that way, Shahista! 💖
@ssekhar65284 жыл бұрын
You are really really gifted at English pls make more advanced structures like this we get confused a lot during speaking and listening
@anthapersephone73112 жыл бұрын
Seeing the example "after I heard the thunder" really helped this sink into place for me. And I'm a native English speaker.
@EnglishWithAshish2 жыл бұрын
Glad!
@mohammedsobbhy4 жыл бұрын
thank you Mr Ashish uranium, having caused serious healthy problems, extracted with many precautions.
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
Great! 👏👏
@oroyoungsvine87932 жыл бұрын
Wallahi you make ma day bro✌🙏
@EnglishWithAshish2 жыл бұрын
Glad to have helped! 🌸
@anastasiashadrina88834 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the explanation! Very easy to understand!
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it, Anastasia! Keep up the support! 🤍
@williamssharon39083 жыл бұрын
That's a great tutorial!👍
@EnglishWithAshish3 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@mfarooq19813 жыл бұрын
Was easy for me. Thank you Asish!
@EnglishWithAshish3 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it! 🌸
@thenewdimension98323 жыл бұрын
Having been seen your video I felt amazing .
@EnglishWithAshish3 жыл бұрын
Having read your comment, I felt good. 🌸😅
@AmitavaBose-64 жыл бұрын
Please please make videos on all modifier in great detail. *******
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
It's coming today!
@iamrahulraj1919Ай бұрын
Hi Ashish, I FOUND A CONTRADICTION!! 1. 1:33 The definition states that the doer of the perfect participle clause and the main clause should be the same. 2. 4:17 In the sentence "Having put his hands on the employer, he got fired from the job," the subject performs the action in the first clause. 3. However, in the second clause, the subject is the receiver of the action (firing), not the doer. 4. This creates a contradiction with the definition, as the subject should be the doer in both clauses. Could this indicate that either the definition(1:33) needs refinement or the sentence doesn't fully align with the rule?
@EnglishWithAshishАй бұрын
In the given example, it is do with the voice of the verb. The main clause here is in the passive voice. When such is the case, both the doers will be different.
@iamrahulraj1919Ай бұрын
@@EnglishWithAshish Apologies, I misunderstood the definition at 1:33 Point 1 in my above comment is not a valid logical conclusion from the definition at 1:33 Thanks for the reply.
@user-joyo3mo7o11 ай бұрын
I got my license renewed after having paid fine.perfect gerund am.I right Sir????May God bless yoi!!!Have a great time to you,Sir!!!
@EnglishWithAshish10 ай бұрын
Yes, correct
@sanjibganguli3084 Жыл бұрын
Respected sir, being the greatest grammarian ever born in India, you are earnestly entreated with folded hands to join the following sentences by using participle -The thief saw the police.He ran away.(Join the sentences)
@EnglishWithAshish Жыл бұрын
Seeing the police, the theif ran away. Thank you for the kind words! 👏
@deepakshet52333 жыл бұрын
Very useful sir
@EnglishWithAshish3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Deepak!
@sanjeevmishra4858 Жыл бұрын
Sir,please clarify my doubt,how it is used in sentenceonly.... Not to be + v3...
@AmitavaBose-64 жыл бұрын
Please make your next video on - Modifiers. ********
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
Sure.
@sharathsurya40963 жыл бұрын
This is something I have been waiting for... finally it is clear. Is there a lesson about 'to have' vs 'to having'? Could you plz share the link here.
@EnglishWithAshish3 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it! No, not precisely.
@anthapersephone73112 жыл бұрын
To having is not really used, Having is also present tense. Having been to the shops, I can eat dinner - perfect participle joins clauses I went to the shops, now I am having dinner. - present tense
@maryamjaved48493 жыл бұрын
Sir when you said perfect participle phrase identifies the subject what does it mean by ? Could you please explain?
@EnglishWithAshish3 жыл бұрын
It refers to the subjet.
@hadivazifehdan55962 жыл бұрын
Man, your videos are just amazing. I got a question though. Let's take your example: Not having studied well, Rohan could not pass the test. My question is to know if we can say it like this: Not studying well, Rohan could not pass the test. I don't know how I feel about it man, what are your thoughts on that? Thanks in advance.
@EnglishWithAshish2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the kind word. To your question, yes. We can. Using the perfect form makes it precisely clear that it happened in the past. Present form sometimes fail to do it. But here, it's fine. They both work.
@wendysmith2305 Жыл бұрын
Sir can I ask what different between"object of preposition" and "preposition phrase" ? the structure of them are preposition +object/modifier.it's not same?
@EnglishWithAshish Жыл бұрын
The object of a preposition is a part of a preposition. It comes after the preposition in a prepositional phrase.
@sharifullahjan75562 жыл бұрын
Hello sir , hope you will doing well. Kindly give me a few examples of adverb clauses which modify adjective and adverb. Look forward to receiving response from you.
@EnglishWithAshish2 жыл бұрын
Watch my video on adverb clauses.
@sharifullahjan75562 жыл бұрын
@@EnglishWithAshish Thank you sir
@letsplaywithgrammar50613 жыл бұрын
Can 'being' be used in place of 'having been' to denote passive perfect participle ?
@EnglishWithAshish3 жыл бұрын
No. HAVING BEEN refers to a past event in the passive voice.
@Aarnubaby3 жыл бұрын
great lesson, thanks for uploading. one question in present participle and past participle, do we have passive forms or not?
@EnglishWithAshish3 жыл бұрын
Yes, a present participle phrase can have a passive form, and past participle phrases are always in the passive form.
@Aarnubaby3 жыл бұрын
@@EnglishWithAshish could you please provide the link please? or make a video on that, present participle passive form being+v3.
@mohammadrahman92852 жыл бұрын
Sir if you don't help me i will never understand please reply me in comment Ali went to kabul after having finished his lessons A teacher of mine told me this is right But as long as i foloow it in KZbin they say the participle phrase must be close to the now it modifies Like having finished his lessons,Ali went to Kabul.
@anthapersephone73112 жыл бұрын
@@mohammadrahman9285 try this - having finished his lessons, Ali went to Kabul, without the time marker. The perfect participle (appears, I am not a teacher) to render the use of a time marker unnecessary. The perfect participle describes the verb as being done in the past. Before he went to Kabul, Ali finished his lessons. Is another variation of your sentence. After Ali finished his lessons Ali went to Kabul. Having finished his lessons Ali went to Kabul. Before Ali went to Kabul, Ali finished his lessons.
@anuragunathilake62554 жыл бұрын
Having reviewed your submission ,following observation are made. is this correct sentence
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
Observations* Yes, that's correct.
@anuragunathilake62554 жыл бұрын
@@EnglishWithAshish thanks
@Geopoliticalguy-z8n10 ай бұрын
So we can only use this with past tense right?
@EnglishWithAshish9 ай бұрын
can't think of a present situation where it can be used. So, yes.
@SERAJDULLASAIKH Жыл бұрын
Kindly give me some examples of perfect participle with "To be" verb and "To have" verb.
@j.b.s80932 жыл бұрын
Perfect participle phrase considered into adjective phrase or adverb phrase ?
@EnglishWithAshish2 жыл бұрын
The context where it is used decides that.
@akshaykumar19852 жыл бұрын
Sir could you tell me difference between past participle vs perfect participle
@EnglishWithAshish2 жыл бұрын
I have a lesson on all types of participle phrases. Watch that.
@sunilahuja32284 жыл бұрын
Kindly explain passive present participle with example in detail
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
Please check out my lesson on present participles.
@balu97664 жыл бұрын
Hello sir , Is perfect participle used along with only simple past tense?
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
Hello, Balu! Yes. That's what we have observed.
@abvenn87912 жыл бұрын
The guests having left ,I went to market .if both subjects are not same , what we call , is that absolute phrase?
@muhammadyameen97604 жыл бұрын
Superfine Video! Having paid the fine,I got my license renewed. Sir, according to structure, this sentence is simple sentence,or compound, Complex or........... Please reply. Thanks.
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
This is a simple sentence, Yameen.
@sunilahuja32284 жыл бұрын
Passive present participle
@majedali88764 жыл бұрын
perfect
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@mohitnegi90803 жыл бұрын
Sir I am having a doubt please check it out that I have seen a lot of people speaking English like this.... I woke up today... I want to ask that why today come up with past tense? We always use past tense in yesterday , ago, 1947 but I woke up today is quite confusing .can you please help me out of this ?
@EnglishWithAshish3 жыл бұрын
That depends what you mean. If you think the day is almost over, you consider it as a past time. Look at the following examples: I had a lot of fun today. We are going to his place today.
@mohitnegi90803 жыл бұрын
thank you sir My English is improving day by day because of you .
@shanmathi18774 жыл бұрын
Could you pls explain the difference between these 1) having known she loves reading, I bought her a book 2) after knowing she loves reading, I bought her a book 3) knowing she loves reading,I bought her a book And I just wanna know in these sentences is the participle phrase acting as an adjective or as an adverb if so what is the purpose of using it as adverb and adjective
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
All these sentences render almost the same meaning. And yes, the participle phrases are working both as an adjective and an adverb.
@shanmathi18774 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot and you are doing an amazing work keep doing ...... know something when I found your channel I was like wow this is what exactly I was looking for
@sivakumar-xj6gc4 жыл бұрын
Having been informed, the SI rushed the spot....Having been informed is adj or adv?
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
It's an adjective clause (participle), but it does seem to have an adverb traits.
@sivakumar-xj6gc4 жыл бұрын
@@EnglishWithAshish Thank you Sir...
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
Happy to help, Siva!
@janakp22523 жыл бұрын
Good lesson,sir I have a doubt on the following sentences.(1) He admitted having been the member of the gang (2) He admitted to have been the member of the gang .Are they both correct . could you pls clarify the meaning.thanks lot in advance
@EnglishWithAshish3 жыл бұрын
We generally use a gerund after the verb ADMIT. It's more about what's more common than the grammar. Glad you liked the lesson, Jana.
@janakp22523 жыл бұрын
Thanks lot sir for your kind reply
@EnglishWithAshish3 жыл бұрын
Happy to help.
@md_ez4 жыл бұрын
What is the difference between perfect gerund and perfect participle?
@md_ez4 жыл бұрын
Please reply.
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
Perfect gerund: a noun that refers to an action that happened earlier than the main verb Perfect participle: an adjective/adverb that refers to a time that's earlier than the main verb I have been out of the town. Sorry for the late reply.
@md_ez4 жыл бұрын
@@EnglishWithAshish Thank you a lot. Give me examples , please.
@ashwinchikate66984 жыл бұрын
1) Corona epidemic started with people having eaten unusual food. is this a perfect participal?
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
Yes, but the sentence looks off because of the tense of the participle. I'll go with a present participle phrase here.
@yasmeenbabar32824 жыл бұрын
Active structure cleared very well but passive structure didn't clear well ,sir
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
Please share your problems!
@yasmeenbabar32824 жыл бұрын
@@EnglishWithAshish Sir you used "by " in first example but you didn't use it in other examples so this thing made me confuse
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
That was optional, Yasmeen. In passive voice, which is used to focus on who or what is affected by an action or who receives an action. We don't focus on who has done it. But if you want to add the doer of the action, you can do it at the end of the sentence using BY. Look at the following two sentences: • He got beaten brutally last night. • He got beaten brutally last night by some people. Both of these sentences are same. We are focusing on who has received an action rather than who has done it. Now, adding the doer of the action is optional, like in the first sentence, I did not add the door of the action, but I did at the doer of the action in the second example. Both are just the same. Hope your confusion is clear now!
@yasmeenbabar32824 жыл бұрын
@@EnglishWithAshish thanks allot you cleared my confusion...
@jsjb34682 жыл бұрын
👍
@EnglishWithAshish2 жыл бұрын
🌸
@hiteshshrimali52604 жыл бұрын
Sir participle na video hindi chenal par banavone please sir
@EnglishWithAshish4 жыл бұрын
Bahot zald, Hitesh! Thoda sa time do dost.
@jigarkathiriya662 жыл бұрын
I had written a line my essay: " When it comes to buy a new thing, ........" But the examiner marked it as a mistake, and corrected it : "When it comes to buying new things,......" Could you explain me what is the difference between these two and why my sentence was incorrect???????
@EnglishWithAshish2 жыл бұрын
Yes, the examiner's correct here. The preposition TO needs an object here, and an infinite or bare infinitive never works as the object of a preposition. It has to be a noun or gerund. ✓ When it comes to teaching English, Ashish is second to none. ✓ When it comes to my friends, I can do anything. ✓ When it comes to hard work, there's one in the company doing more than he's doing. Hope the explanation helps! 🌸
@jigarkathiriya662 жыл бұрын
@@EnglishWithAshish means COMES TO is like goes/go/went to which is always followed by noun.....
@balwinderkaurbomrah16772 жыл бұрын
Having completed my studies,i decided to do a job.
@EnglishWithAshish2 жыл бұрын
That's a good one. 👏
@iswaranag4401 Жыл бұрын
Could I have your no sir??
@EnglishWithAshish Жыл бұрын
Don't take it otherwise but I don't share my number.