ENTP vs. ESFP - ILE vs. SEE - Explained Correctly

If you ever want help finding out your true Jungian personality type, please email [e-mail] with 'Find my Type' in the title to book your paid Diagnostic Interview.
My comprehensive crash course on Socionics is out and ready to purchase. If you are interested, please email [e-mail] with 'Course' in the title.
#entp #esfp #socionics #mbti #myersbriggs
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: kzbin.info...
Become a Patron: / worldsocionics
Join our Facebook group: / worldsocionicssociety
Like our Facebook page: / worldsocionicssociety
Check out our Blog: worldsocionics.blogspot.com/

[@AdoptionLawSourceTrinity]

Good to have you back. These compare- and- contrast segments are very helpful.

[@marynvos4028]

Always excited when I see a new upload from you - the detail in which you discuss each type and your effortless and stimulating delivery is truly exceptional.

[@jaredvaughan1665]

When SEE makes contact with the 🌎 they start to look more like EIE in public and EII in private. When ILE makes contact with the 🌎 they start to look more like LSE in public and LSI in private.

[@victorangeles655]

information element time stamps would be cool, but good video regardless this comparison in particular is very interesting to me.

[@WeWuntBeDruv]

i'm just here for your knowledge. Feed me!

[@ajarnwordsmith628]

There you are again. Greetings.

[@davidzelman]

Just discovered socionics and am blown away by how accurate ESFP breaks down compared to the Myers Briggs definition

[@iankinzel]

Saw the smear campaign. I don't know which is worse - how dishonest it was, or how incompetently it was executed. I know some of these type comparisons may seem kind of weird at face value - not a lot of people are going to mistake Bill O'Reilly for an ILE. But these unexpected similarities are a great reminder about the dangers of premature type conclusions.

[@WorldSocionics]

Thanks Ian!

[@BeyondPersonality]

You had someone do a smear campaign against you? Lol i can relate 🤣

[@art_deanoism]

Disappointed with how you were treated in the media, Jack. Interesting question for you. What type do you think Nigel Farage is? ESTP?

[@WorldSocionics]

ENTJ, I'd say.

[@phosphorusphthorum]

He voted for tories

[@GodWindu]

problem is the entp you describe here do not fit you as you are a classical socionists and you pretty much accept everything in socionics and anytime you change something it's not a content change but a name change. you do not question the fundamentals at all. you accept all fundamentals, all axioms, all dichotomies socionics suggests. according to you, all dichotomies and all quadras and just everything works in socionics and perfect. so your approach more like that of a thelogian's. you know, you begin accepting everything bible says first, THEN you use your logic to defend "whatever" the book says. now tell me, where's the bold and dominant ne in this approach? where is your ideational impactfulness? ever since you started this channel, what was one thing you said that people can accept as ideationally impactful? host eric is full of this, for example. he goes on a limp with his ideas and takes risks. you don't. at all. even csj combined linda berens with beebe to a certain degree and i type him esfj. now you tend to say things like "i always keep an open mind, i always give the benefit of doubt to possibilities even if i think they are unlikely" or stuff to that effect. but that's just ne valuing. inxps will be like that too. the question is where is the BOLD ne, where's the dominant ne? your ne is cautious. i said this before but in 100 typology interviews you maybe make 3 jokes. why? because your fe is not bold either, let alone bold and weak. you say culture, you say blabla. excuses... intp do not need any of those excuses. you even display fi role all the time. go watch your interview with that enfp guy who said his grandmother or granddad died "hhahah". watch your face. compare your face to his. you are so, sooooo ethics proper. ok: are you mister fe/fi-jekyll in front of the camera and then when cam is off and you are hanging with your friends you go nuts and start making edgy jokes and start spurting crazy ideas? i don't think so. i'm pretty sure this is who you are. you need to go into subtypes land to argue you are an entp. maybe you are a double feminine entp or something like that.

[@WorldSocionics]

I think kicking the 'unconscious' out of typology was a pretty bold move. Also, if you think I just changed the names of things, you haven't properly looked at the definitions.

[@GodWindu]

@@WorldSocionics unconscious was always one of the most questionable terms in typology if we are talking about unconsciousness in its pure form. but as you must know, some functions are simply much more at the background, for example ni of entp or si of estp. you are either going to call that less conscious or unconscious. you can call it unvalued but then i'll ask why unvalued, by which mechanism? and when you try to explain that mechanism you will end up describing something very similar to lack of mental focus which means lack of conscious focus. make a video where you focus on what's different in your understanding vs socionics @wikisocion. maybe you already have such a video, then direct me to it. do you expect me to watch all your videos and find the differences one by one, if they even exist?