I thought of another counter-argument: if God is an almighty being, wouldn't he know that you're faking believing in God? So there's no point in faking it. You either believe or not.
@tahmkenchusta58522 жыл бұрын
I don’t think that matters if you follow the doctrine as it’s intended
@bahnankhayre95347 ай бұрын
I’m pretty sure Pascal’s response to this was literally that he just doesn’t care.
@geronimo81592 ай бұрын
I consider doing Satan's landscaping a career opportunity.
@psychurch3 жыл бұрын
Would pay to hear op have a conversation with jehova’s witnesses 😂
@Nyght-08 Жыл бұрын
I was hoping to hear a much better counter argument
@user_16064 ай бұрын
If you do not live by any name in virtue life you will do opposit by any name then don't jock around ..if you believe in god and live by virtue you will win by any religion..all religion are share in both and different in custom and ceremony then don't jock around 😢
@Existentialist-earthling5211 ай бұрын
It just fails in every way at every point.
@brianw.52305 жыл бұрын
7:00 Christianity is different than other religions because its based on Jesus's resurrection.
@markoslavicek3 жыл бұрын
Maybe different from few most popular religions today, but not from all religions in the world or all religions in history. Orphism, among others, also believes in ressurection (only not of Jesus but of Orpheus and Dionysus). No religion is an island and Christianity was equally so influenced a lot by its context.
@brianw.52303 жыл бұрын
@@markoslavicek were they real historical figures like Jesus was?
@markoslavicek3 жыл бұрын
@@brianw.5230 To ancient believers, yes, they probably considered Orpheus a historical figure. But to give an another example from a similar context, Pythagoras is widely regarded and accepted as a historical figure just like Jesus, and the religion/philosophy based on his teachings - Pythagoreanism - believed in transmigration of souls and that Pythagoras was reborn. We can argue that this is closer to the concept of reincarnation rather than ressurection, but there are other examples in Eastern religions and elsewhere. The story changes the form and characters, but the idea of overcoming death and material existence remains the same. Even in the Bible Jesus is not the only human resurrected, they occur in the Old Testament, too. The problem with all these historical figures like Pythagoras and Jesus is that they lived so long ago that we have barely any reliable sources on their lives, and their biographies are largely fabricated and they often resemble one another. But if we speak about today's situation (and back in Pascal's times, of course), yes, Christianity does hold a sort of copyright on the resurrection issue, as Pythagoreanism and other religions are not a thing anymore (or at least not in the West). Jesus is definitelly the most popular resurrected person today.
@brianw.52303 жыл бұрын
@@markoslavicek Almost all historical scholars believe that Jesus was a real person.
@markoslavicek3 жыл бұрын
@@brianw.5230 Indeed, just like Pythagoras or Socrates. And they all most probably were.
@christinemartin632 жыл бұрын
Yeah but you have to lie to yourself and pretend--again 🙄.
@carlyellison84985 жыл бұрын
Men philosophize but we make things real.
@carlyellison84985 жыл бұрын
@Enrique Cordon - philosophy boils down to an argument that we are winning. Does that help?
@Tightness85 жыл бұрын
@@carlyellison8498 who is "We"? Women?
@carlyellison84985 жыл бұрын
@@Tightness8 - don't put words in my mouth, if you could not do that, please.
@Tightness85 жыл бұрын
@@carlyellison8498 was I quoting you or asking you a question?