I can't help but wonder why I pay thousands of dollars for university tuition if my stupid textbooks can't explain things as easily as many of the wonderful videos by people such as yourself. Thanks so much for this!
@stefdanut1233 жыл бұрын
so true :)
@saomaster10213 жыл бұрын
Because you want that piece of paper
@Abdulrahman85811 жыл бұрын
In five minutes you teached me something that I spent all day trying to figure out ..thanks so much
@jaredtweed78263 жыл бұрын
Honestly same! This video simplified the idea so much.
@acedev0032 жыл бұрын
Same here. Been scratching my head whole day staring at my note for this particular topic.
@roxiogamer7 жыл бұрын
All these lectures in uni about this and I go to one 6 minuet KZbin video which explains something I failed to grasp in an hours lecture. You sir are fantastic! You made it simple and easy to understand.
@readward25729 жыл бұрын
My textbook says: "To find the equivalence class of every element of A, do this: [0] = {x E A | xR0 } = {0,4} [1] = {x E A | xR1 } = {1,3} [2] = {x E A | xR2 } = {2} ..... and so on." I have no idea what the author is talking about. I do not understand why some professors do not use simple English to express some new concepts. Your video makes it so easy for me to understand what Equivalence Class really is. For that, I say thank you.
@ikik327 жыл бұрын
Agreed. The authors of these textbooks are much to pompous and arrogant to realize who their audience is. They thought they would be winning a nobel prize in their youth and now take out their anger for their failures on university students trying to learn. Shame on them. I'm not going to get the job app for the free game tickets for the game tickets for my tickets and I don't get it because they don't get tickets to get the game tickets for tickets I want tickets and they will and I have a big ticket for a Christmas present and they don't have to be there when I'm leaving for Christmas because they are not going to be there because they are so big they have to come back with the squad they don't are there for Christmas they 🎄 with the a frat house that is a big bag security for a man to get a free game tickets for Christmas Day and the game tickets for Christmas Day and they will a frat ticket for yuyyour and the squad they have tickets to get tickets for tickets tickets to Christmas and Christmas Eve is going on a super smash ticket for Christmas and they are going out of their way and he came tickets to Christmas and Christmas dinner for Christmas present and tickets are on their team comes on
@mahekshah93375 жыл бұрын
what the author says is x is in equivalance with a and with realation to 0 i think . its my personal view
@MaggotDiggo15 жыл бұрын
I think lecturers should be explaining the concept both mathematically and intuitively.
@LalitKumar-sr4ez5 жыл бұрын
Same here
@ea17662 жыл бұрын
Agreed, why do they make everything seem so complicated. It's torture.
@V33D0011 жыл бұрын
I've spent 5 days trying to understand how equivalence classes actually work, you just taught me in five minutes. Super helpful video and detailed video. Thanks alot!
@expectedmiracle12 жыл бұрын
The book, for which I paid $200, was so confusing. You made it crystal clear in 5 mins. You are awesome.
@abhinavskumar16086 жыл бұрын
Thank u sir....I've been trying to study it for an hour now....my textbooks are making it complex...but u explained in in the most simple way...thank you
@tavrion12 жыл бұрын
Thank you for taking the time to make these videos. Such a fundamental concept, yet very few (if any) books clearly explain these concepts with examples as good as these.
@REXanadu11 жыл бұрын
Nice refresher before a test. I had so much trouble remembering what an equivalence class was until I saw this video. Thanks.
@謝霖泳-n8v3 жыл бұрын
Illustrated clearly!!! gratitude from NTHU, Taiwan.
@MrHalberg2 жыл бұрын
Great video, thanks for the help! Still relevant info 10+ years later!
@thomasallison64135 жыл бұрын
Spent two days and a lecture trynna figure this out. You succeeded in 5 minutes my man
@RagnarSwanson11 жыл бұрын
I just spent an hour trying to figure this out. Man, this is really simple. Thanks.
@johnfcarter13 жыл бұрын
Glad it helped.
@davidmooreulster5 жыл бұрын
This is a great explanation. Simple and concise, thank you!
@ma5riam183 жыл бұрын
Thanks, great video. Cleared my confusion on this topic.
@acedev0032 жыл бұрын
Thanks a ton for this amazingly simple video. Hope you make more videos like this into the future.....
@peterkessinger196511 жыл бұрын
Explained really well and straight to the point, thanks.
@JamesDavidson4248 жыл бұрын
Really helped me understand this concept, thank you!
@Kazutadashi6 жыл бұрын
Awesome video, makes perfect sense explained this way
@Abdullah526712 жыл бұрын
Thanks bro, i was confused about equivalence class but this blew away the fog
@mosammatyeasmin20267 жыл бұрын
Very helpful and very easy !!! Thank u....
@yildizyeni10 жыл бұрын
you are THE MAN. thanks a lot, I mean A LOT
@bunmiakinremi3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this video, I haven't really gotten the concept since last year until now
@nguchi113 жыл бұрын
Thankyou so much. I was struggling with equivalence classes and its been most helpful...
@137princyram37 жыл бұрын
Very Helpful For my Exam Thank You Sir !!
@FugieGamers6 жыл бұрын
I know their is really old but Im was studying a math book by myself and this concept never clicked for me. Thanks for this video man
@빨리방리6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for clear explanation. plz come to my university and replace prof
@rene-parizh3 жыл бұрын
Great video! Thanks!
@BLCxlongboards8 жыл бұрын
Your video was finally able to help me. Thanks!
@kartiksinghslathia25297 жыл бұрын
Really helpful thanks for the information
@roanrovu34794 жыл бұрын
When you try to listen carefully to your teacher but his/her voice cracked 1:58
@aeglen9 жыл бұрын
Clear explanation, the underlining really helped, thanks!
@chummyigbo88448 жыл бұрын
Great video. Thanks
@ea17662 жыл бұрын
Good video, straight to the point! Rubbish lecture notes that make this seem extremely confusing.
@10kevinle6 жыл бұрын
Understood it instantly! Textbook made no sense. Thank you.
@Raawr7713 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video, very simple when its explained like this as opposed to how it was in my class.
@martinfextremevocals10 жыл бұрын
I had some problems understanding this. thank you
@priscillaton76695 жыл бұрын
So clear and helpful, thank you so much!!
@mark-65728 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU I have a question so what is a quotient set (it's related to similar to equivalence classes) and could you give an example
@ShawryaMehrotra7 жыл бұрын
Thank your John, very helpful
@reubenwilliammpembe6676 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir - you are the best!!!
@akbarabbaskadaya82958 жыл бұрын
How to find Rank of equivalent relations?
@KellyMaryOnette12 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! my textbook was so vague; this really clarified things!
@n4223r11 жыл бұрын
Thanks. This was very helpful.
@JuliaNagy-w3n5 жыл бұрын
1:24 and i finally understood why i can't make 2 different classes with one and the same value. Can i shout "THANK YOU"?
@thelearner8735 жыл бұрын
Thank you for teaching this !!
@davidgaster8 жыл бұрын
I thought equivalence classes are all disjoint? [Edit:] Wait nevermind, the equivalence classes of [1], [2], and [3] are all equal, so they are the same equivalence class.
@DOUMIBRA8 жыл бұрын
Very clear sir. Thanks..
@jsgodara95226 жыл бұрын
It seems so easy now. Thanks.
@amitapadhi26525 жыл бұрын
Tysm ....u clear my all doubts in only 5 minutes tysm
@mikesta210 жыл бұрын
thank you jesus
@ITI-xi5zx3 жыл бұрын
Is the video not showing text for anyone else?
@ohehoyevlogger3 жыл бұрын
It's like Maggie in 4-5 minutes 😎😎🔥🔥😀
@HoangTrongNghia11 жыл бұрын
is [6] = empty set or [6]=[1]=[2]=[3]?
@iamsashanksahil3 жыл бұрын
🔥Thank You Sir!!🙏
@oliviamcclure28735 жыл бұрын
Thank you John.
@I3uzzzzzz5 жыл бұрын
thank you for this. you made it so clear. if i wanted the quotient set, that would simply be all of the equivalence classes right?
@nihao8522 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! It helps a lot.
@knaxel Жыл бұрын
I can't believe how many of us are here because university convinced us they could actually teach better than random internet strangers
@sharmilaraja30866 жыл бұрын
in the set Z of integers define mRn if m-n is divisible by 7.prove that R is an equivalence relation.plz explain it
@nicoletti9014 жыл бұрын
Whenever you need to prove equivalence relations, just show that the properties of reflexibility, symmetry and transitivity hold. For this example: Reflexibility. m-m=0 is divisible by 7, hence mRm holds Symmetry. If m-n is divisible by 7, then so is n-m (since n-m = -(m-n) ), hence mRn -> nRm holds Transitivity. If mRn and nRa, then 7 divides both m-n and n-a. 7 then also must divide their sum. (m-n) + (n-a) = m-a, hence mRn
@thetosman11 жыл бұрын
Exactly what I was looking for, thanks.
@TheAllen5014 жыл бұрын
but the x and y position is exactly the OPPOSITE from what my prof taught in class. Just found another video that explained the way my prof did.
@tomashaddad4 жыл бұрын
yep, his definition is backwards ... for a binary relation R on a set A, the equivalence class containing a is the set [a] = {x in X: xRa}; i.e. for an ordered pair (x, y) in our set R, if y = a, then x is an element of the equivalence class
@CodeProps12 жыл бұрын
Thanks ..it really helped.
@Jae-espi11 жыл бұрын
I love you and everything you live and stand for.
@Cwlluke10 жыл бұрын
Cool video.
@awesomerfun63129 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the help......:)
@GaiusAnonymous11 жыл бұрын
thanks, well illustrated
@shihabudheenillikkal13338 жыл бұрын
good lecture
@minwoo50310 жыл бұрын
Omg, thank you so much sir! I understand now!
@METALsyndr0me11 жыл бұрын
This was fantastic, thanks!
@chenzhuo96 жыл бұрын
god bless you.
@maneeeshind669210 жыл бұрын
if we add (2,4) and (4,2) in relation set then then equivalence set of 1 will be {1,2,3} and equivalence set of 2 will be {2,1,3,4}.,.. now why the equivalence set of 1 and 2 does not match now,.??? plz guide.,.,
@midaseosrs60210 жыл бұрын
With your additions, the equivalence relation is no longer an equivalence relation, as it isn't transitive. You would also need to add (1,4), and (4,1) which would result in the relation again being an equivalence relation. Then the equivalence class of 1 would be {1,2,3,4}.
@kazjansen576210 жыл бұрын
Not entirely true. If you add (2,4) and (4,2), this would imply that via transitivity you need the following extra relations: If 1 leads to 2, and 2 to 4, than 1 leads to 4 (so 1,4) If 3 leads to 2, and 2 to 4, than 3 leads to 4 (so 3,4) The problem is that, by symmetry, you would also require (1,4) and (3,4) to have symmetric pairs. By adding (4,1) and (4,3), this problem is also solved and equivalence is again obtained.
@ricric47223 жыл бұрын
Thank You!!! Thank You!!!
@anshikasingh91774 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir🙏
@pintudon320911 жыл бұрын
exactly what i was looking for thnks .
@Yeasmin123 жыл бұрын
Write distinct equivalence classes of Z if n=4 so that Z is the union of these
@nevingeorge9893 жыл бұрын
Thanks bro
@patrickdoll60367 жыл бұрын
Thank you kind sir!
@mti42257 жыл бұрын
Thanku soo much man...
@kulithnajika256511 жыл бұрын
u are da best
@forrest-forrest5 жыл бұрын
Why did I struggle so much understanding this?!
@FReeARouND199210 жыл бұрын
very helpful thanks a lot!
@trinathon3611 жыл бұрын
Thanks SO much! Helped a ton =D
@re76508 жыл бұрын
Made my day1!!
@MrNwanda11 жыл бұрын
thanks, this really helped me alot.
@kuchki112 жыл бұрын
thanks, that video helped me understand it
@patbateman694206 жыл бұрын
Cool video, thanks. Still glad I changed majors tho.
@alekhyavaddempudi93863 жыл бұрын
Handwriting doesn't matter content is important while watching this video ilearned