Equivalence Relations Definition and Examples

  Рет қаралды 133,078

The Math Sorcerer

The Math Sorcerer

9 жыл бұрын

Please Subscribe here, thank you!!! goo.gl/JQ8Nys
Equivalence Relations Definition and Examples. This video starts by defining a relation, reflexive relation, symmetric relation, transitive relation, and then an equivalence relation. Several examples are given.

Пікірлер: 37
@gob9940
@gob9940 7 жыл бұрын
you didn't go through each example, you just said "it turns out" that each case was either reflexive, symmetric, or transitive. This video doesn't help because there are steps left out of how you determined each to be reflexive, symmetric, etc.
@darkkupo5162
@darkkupo5162 3 жыл бұрын
there are no more steps. You have to be able to think ;)
@roelin360
@roelin360 3 жыл бұрын
@@darkkupo5162 why would you even be on a video to learn how to do these things if you could already do it?
@wywlf6912
@wywlf6912 3 жыл бұрын
@@darkkupo5162 dumbass
@RonChase21
@RonChase21 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video but I wish you would have explained why each problem was Reflexive, Symmetric, or transitive. That would have made everything clearer
@stevefreed3646
@stevefreed3646 6 жыл бұрын
you showed an example but didn't bother explaining it
@vocaljazz32
@vocaljazz32 8 жыл бұрын
How do you prove that the congruence modulo is an equivalence relation?
@War_lord_K2
@War_lord_K2 6 жыл бұрын
congruence modulo means when two numbers are divided by the same number, the remainders are equal. And we know, "equal to" is an equivalence relation.
@kcaldwell_
@kcaldwell_ 8 жыл бұрын
For the last example, where can i find the proof that you referenced? In the other video? Can't seem to find it. Thanks
@Theboss4103
@Theboss4103 7 жыл бұрын
in the example with S=(complex numbers) surely it is transitive because if x is not = to y and y is not = to z then x is not = to z
@1989DP3
@1989DP3 6 жыл бұрын
It's not transitive. If x!=y and y!=z that does not conclusively prove any relation between x and z.
@jakemoran287
@jakemoran287 6 жыл бұрын
No, because x and z could equal eachother but still not equal y. ie, x=1,y=2,z=1
@1409musiclover
@1409musiclover 6 жыл бұрын
great examples. thank you.
@yamatanoorochi3149
@yamatanoorochi3149 3 ай бұрын
7:27 if x is related to y then y is related to x. Symmetric ✓ x is also related to itself because x has the same parents as itself. Reflexive ✓ if y is related to z because the have the same parents then x is also related to z. Transitive ✓ So Equivalent ✓
@quintustheophilus9550
@quintustheophilus9550 7 жыл бұрын
I have a question, What does S1, S2, S3 have to be? Just any element of the Set S? Also, do all the elements of a set have to follow the equivalence relation?
@Mage_Chartreux
@Mage_Chartreux 2 жыл бұрын
The nature of the conditions for a relation (set of ordered pairs) to be an equivalence relation means that all members of the set must satisfy the transitive, symmetric, and reflexive properties. (These are relation properties, so if some member of the set violates the definition of one of those properties, then you can't say the set has that property.)
@kululu4413
@kululu4413 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Great examples.
@yamatanoorochi3149
@yamatanoorochi3149 3 ай бұрын
I don't understand the last example, at all What prerequisites do I need
@TheMathSorcerer
@TheMathSorcerer 9 жыл бұрын
@pontuseriksson2825
@pontuseriksson2825 7 жыл бұрын
Great video :)
@brentgallagher3603
@brentgallagher3603 7 жыл бұрын
good examples
@TheMathSorcerer
@TheMathSorcerer 7 жыл бұрын
thx!
@xpertstrategist2216
@xpertstrategist2216 7 жыл бұрын
Let A = Z and let R = {(x, y): x, y ∈ A, x2 = y2}. Prove that R is an equivalence relation
@VeNtICeO
@VeNtICeO 5 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@1989DP3
@1989DP3 6 жыл бұрын
Great video, helped me a lot. Thanks!
@TheMathSorcerer
@TheMathSorcerer 6 жыл бұрын
awesome glad it helped!!
@ruthzkycanz
@ruthzkycanz 3 жыл бұрын
If bRa and aRb does it imply that a=b?
@marioburgos8656
@marioburgos8656 7 жыл бұрын
I think that it is transitive in the example with S=(complex numbers). Right?
@camilomuianga7865
@camilomuianga7865 Жыл бұрын
Yes, definetely you are right! I was solving it now, and i've prooved it!
@reyichen1382
@reyichen1382 3 жыл бұрын
great examples
@TheMathSorcerer
@TheMathSorcerer 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@Eis461
@Eis461 7 ай бұрын
12:05 where is the video link
@kae5315
@kae5315 9 жыл бұрын
Good video! Thanks!
@TheMathSorcerer
@TheMathSorcerer 9 жыл бұрын
Kathleen Epperson glad it helped!!
@abdussy.6547
@abdussy.6547 3 жыл бұрын
HEYY BOSS. I NEED YOUR HELP. THİS İS MY LAST CHANCE TO PROVE AN EQUALITY. CAN YOU WRITE YOUR E MAIL? THANK YOU BOSS I LOVE YOU. ( THE DEADLİNE İS TODAN 10 P.M.)
Proving a Relation is an Equivalence Relation | Example 1
14:56
Brain Gainz
Рет қаралды 12 М.
Reflexive, Symmetric, Transitive Tutorial
16:15
LearnYouSomeMath
Рет қаралды 181 М.
КАКОЙ ВАШ ЛЮБИМЫЙ ЦВЕТ?😍 #game #shorts
00:17
Chips evolution !! 😔😔
00:23
Tibo InShape
Рет қаралды 42 МЛН
NO NO NO YES! (50 MLN SUBSCRIBERS CHALLENGE!) #shorts
00:26
PANDA BOI
Рет қаралды 102 МЛН
Equivalence Classes Partition a Set Proof
15:26
The Math Sorcerer
Рет қаралды 65 М.
RELATIONS - DISCRETE MATHEMATICS
15:36
TrevTutor
Рет қаралды 899 М.
Equivalence Relations: Sample Problems
7:48
James Hamblin
Рет қаралды 38 М.
Proving a Relation is an Equivalence Relation | Example 2
11:20
Brain Gainz
Рет қаралды 8 М.
Why is the limit of (1+1/x)^x = e?
5:43
Calculus with Rebecca
Рет қаралды 1,4 М.
equivalence classes
5:24
John Carter
Рет қаралды 242 М.
Equivalence Relations!
17:20
Brain Gainz
Рет қаралды 3 М.
Equivalence Relations  - Reflexive, Symmetric, and Transitive
4:36
Dr. Trefor Bazett
Рет қаралды 130 М.
Equivalence Relations
27:35
Sir JPagdilao Classroom
Рет қаралды 1,8 М.
Studying Things You Hate
8:13
The Math Sorcerer
Рет қаралды 9 М.
КАКОЙ ВАШ ЛЮБИМЫЙ ЦВЕТ?😍 #game #shorts
00:17