ESFP Jack Black: #4 non Ego

[@fastneataverage]

This is so great. I wish Jack Black would get a chance to hear this. I think he would love being seen so well.

[@Universal_Cymbol]

If you're going to introduce a new type of system to pair for OBS, please at least give an intro on it. Sheesh!

[@Owlsworthy]

What do you mean? There are plenty of videos defining the terms and intros. There’s also their website.

[@Owlsworthy]

Finally some hope. FF (b) here, I didn’t think there was an extra gear. I figured my blast would always be pathetic lol.

[@practicalpersonality]

Such a great story of a #4 who found his Flex driven by the need for Friends at the top.

[@caiden3396]

Social type fours seem highly inclined towards companionship, social support, and social play with little egotism and little serious boasting.🙂

[@drcharliewallace]

I used to think I was a 1, but after watching this, I think I may be a 4.

[@34laye]

What's the definition of number. Can you please explain with example. Thansk

[@dariaantonov7257]

Here is their doc for the numbers (socials): docs.google.com/document/u/0/d/106Y1W3ui8IUMptspLebPQTfdBLXaF-wg359vUcR-kkQ/mobilebasic?pli=1

[@Universal_Cymbol]

I know! This kind of came out of nowhere!

[@34laye]

Thanks for sharing the link. It's helpful. Do you have others links. I m just about to start in ops world.

[@akaboo69]

Reverence is what esfps and intjs are after and I see that in this video

[@martinparigini]

This is great

[@siunkii]

i'm not jack, but i'm a very close type to him (FM ver) and this made me very happy. love to see of the play skibby examples more

[@-n1637]

Can you please type Angelina Jolie and Steph Curry? Im curious

[@alicecaroline7254]

Can someone explain to me what the hell these numbers mean?

[@latenightlogic]

I’ve seen this bullshit on tinder… with zero explanation what any of them mean.

[@Afgnwrlrd]

Love it

[@traditionalgirl3943]

What are the numbers about? Slots? Enneagram?

[@caiden3396]

Social type

[@Debloper]

@@caiden3396 where do I go to read/know more about it? Googling phrases including "social type" isn't helping much (and I'm assuming it's not enneagram).

[@someonerandom713]

@@Debloper It's a theory Dave and Shan came up with, your only source for it is the OPS community thus far, you can't really google it. Basically, the four social types have two new coins, two of which you have saviour, two of which demon: - Flex/Ego vs Friends - Responsibility vs Specialization There are four possible combinations, that form four different social types. The social types are entirely seperate from the 512 OPS types. The combinations are: 1. Flex/Ego & Responsibility 2. Responsibility & Friends 3. Specialize & Flex/Ego 4. Friends & Specialize Jack Black is a 4, which is opposite to a 1. His social type is characterized the most by the "Friends" saviour, which has him wanting to be buddies with everyone, as Dave explained in the video. A 1 would very much seek to beat everyone and be at the top of social hierarchies, as their most important coin is Flex/Ego. You could have a 1 of Jack Black's exact same 512 type (MF-Se/Te-PC/S(B)) and they would come across _very_ different. Much more ego driven. A good example for that is the Big Ramy video from recently, Big Ramy is also a 4 and the same 512 type as type 1 Koby Bryant, or another 1 who even is in the same field as Big Ramy.

[@akaboo69]

He's esfp I agree

[@brocklytodd5317]

Yeah he's ESFP lol

[@Brickwilliams]

Jack black is an enfp, y’all literally get almost every person wrong

[@Ponitypon]

where is the Ne?

[@Brickwilliams]

@@Ponitypon everywhere, he’s like the same person as Steve carell

[@Ponitypon]

saying "everywhere" isnt really proving anything - he is giving ton of details and isnt jumping from concepts to concept like Peterson does (he is an ENTP) or RDJ (ENFP) @@Brickwilliams

[@PowerRedBullTypology]

@@Ponitypon Jordan does not jump from concept to concept at all. Where does he do that? He talks about certain specific archetypical concepts, often based on works of older researchers/philosophers and creates one Ni narrative out of them and uses Te consensus science facts in his reasoning as well. He is never all over the place (width) like Ne, or about novelty. Most of the things he says are old stories rather than new. The only reason it might seem new is because most people today do not know any of these things. Ne has an interesting in the weird/new. Basically the alternative of everything that is already there. Peterson has no interested in that and is very, very careful about what he says whereas the Ne doms typically say things without thinking about it first (trait of Ne in general) He does not use his own reasoning, but rather collects ancient archetypical ideas (Ni) and has very absolute Ni stances of things (black/white) rather than Ne which tends to be much more grey.

[@Brickwilliams]

@@Ponitypon peterson is intp and rdj is entp😂 idk how some people are so lost in typing, just small brains ig

[@PowerRedBullTypology]

He's one of the most obvious Ne dom types there are in my view. Ne types have this childlike, goofy, craziness, interest of being over the top etc. I do not see when he is a bit consistently doing anything to suggest Se. He's never orientated towards being slightly interested in being strong or cool like a Jake Paul or other such clearly Se dom types. Neither do such types like a Jake Paul seem to have any interest to being goofy/funny, witty, or any of such Ne things jack seems interested in. Also, does Jack really seem like a physically strong person to anyone? Sure, he does not look skinny or super weak, but he does not have a big masculine frame or big hands or any of such high testosterone traits that Se often seem to have. Also, a Jake Paul (desperately) wants to be taken seriously (now as a fighter - Se domain) which Jack does not seem to have any interest in. He would likely make even more fun of himself if people were to take him more seriously in that Se way, while at the same time Jack does have serious singing abilities. He also often uses absurd analogies "a hot mess of cheese" when it in a literal sense has nothing to do with it like a band's music style. I am aware though this is basically Dave's system which apparently means it makes any of his claims 'officially' true in his system. However, any system is basically just an extended opinion of any person(s)

[@crackheadtommy]

So I can live my life being a weak pos and hit the gym and become Se dom? What if I take comedy classes too? Id be big strong and goofy. Would I be Se or Ne dom?

[@dariaantonov7257]

He’s energy dom that’s why he’s goofy. Also he’s no.4 Just because someone’s funny doesn’t mean they have to have Me. Clearly he’s sensory dominant with demon intuition. Also he doesn’t have the Ne/Si axis because the facts are non-personal and concepts are personal.

[@sdn5682]

"orientated towards being slightly interested in being strong or cool" is ti or fi. How is that Se?? and how often is he using analogies?? is he using it like every time is he open his mouth or just "a hot mess of cheese" i think you messed up here my friend