ESK - 9x Syntrx Soundscape

[@phaedra19561]

A very good demonstration, thank you very much! It is clear to hear why a first generation Syntrx sounds more unique and, to me, more interesting than its successor, the Syntrx II, which has neither a diode filter nor a spring reverb.

[@InFamousProductions]

ya I agree. I love my MKII, but that MKI def has a different sound. If I could get one, it would be really cool to run one Into the other.

[@orminfactory]

Good idea! 😀​@@InFamousProductions

[@orminfactory]

Oh yes 🫠

[@andreanunnari2710]

Very nice, may I ask you what’s the box with the big knob at the back of the Syntrx?

[@Metunar]

Thanks. It's a function generator. A simple oscillator without CV control for labor use.

[@InFamousProductions]

I have a MK II, and I think it's little different than the MK I. I really want to get one of those MK I's . the tone seems to be not as harsh as the MKII. more beefy . cool idea to layer them. Is the stereo field out of the Syntrx?

[@Metunar]

I couldn't compare the 2 versions. But i think the MK2 has some good improvements. On the MK1 I find the filter quite characterless, specially the resonance and the vernier dials are not good (they have a dead spot when changing direction). Also no sequencer on the matrix. I would keep the MK2. Anyway, yes, i recorded the syntrx on the most tracks stereo. Or by moving the pan manually or with a pseudo pan modulation. But I used also stereo effects from the MPC.