Dr Sledge - "The Israelites were polytheists!" The Prophets - "We know 😞"
@TheEsotericaChannel5 ай бұрын
The prophets were also probably a type of polytheists as well
@AnthonyRamsay-tg8xg5 ай бұрын
What was Benjamin calling?
@GldnClaw5 ай бұрын
The Deuteronomists stamped out a lot. I'd recommend "In the Language of Adam" for more
@OverOnTheWildSide5 ай бұрын
Good one!
@UncannyRicardo5 ай бұрын
@@TheEsotericaChannel I'm sure they'd say the same about Catholics if we had fragmented ruins of their saints and handful of texts reciting their prayers.
@Binarokaro5 ай бұрын
The deities of Ancient Canaan being local to their shrines is so interesting to me because that's just how it is here in Japan, where the kami is basically only present in the shrines dedicated to them. There is something nice and cozy about it honestly, like every once in a while I'll just take a different side street than usual while strolling in the city and come across a shrine I've never been to before, and I get to learn about what kami resides at that shrine and see what kind of prayers people do there, and of course make an offering of my own and do a prayer as well. Like the other day I just randomly found a shrine dedicated to a kami of love, where most of the wooden plaques of wishes people had left there were about relationships and marriages. This kind of spiritual landscape is quite nice honestly. I imagine that in Ancient Canaan, this was likely how it was like too.
@alaricgoldkuhl1555 ай бұрын
That's beautiful. My son has been obsessed with Japanese culture for most of his life. He's just turned 18 and is heading there on holiday soon. I'll be sure to let him know to keep an eye out for such shrines.❤️
@gooddiscourse5 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing this.
@lambdadelta31195 ай бұрын
Project Moon/Occultisim Pipeline runs deep.
@Binarokaro5 ай бұрын
@@lambdadelta3119 Yeah, that IS in fact how I got into the Kabbalah and started reading the Zohar.
@sciencey28585 ай бұрын
@@Binarokaro As a PM fan, nice!
@Stoneworks5 ай бұрын
Babe wake up new Esoterica on YHWH dropped
@antewaso88765 ай бұрын
😂Arise! Arise!
@szilveszterforgo87765 ай бұрын
I wanted to comment that exact same thing😭
@Monka835 ай бұрын
😂😂❤
@leoelliondeux5 ай бұрын
Dude fr, this topic never gets old for me
@pizzaman0445 ай бұрын
Stoneworks? I sure hope it does!! Jokes aside, cool seeing you here
@TheModernHermeticist5 ай бұрын
"I bet my sky dad can beat up ur sea monster dad!" "Nuh uh!"
@TheEsotericaChannel5 ай бұрын
*several centuries later* "Your MOM's an emanation!" "Well, at least she's not an ARCHON like your MOM!"
@CriticalBreak5 ай бұрын
@@TheEsotericaChannel 🤣😂 touche!
@zero-dollartrader64405 ай бұрын
It's 1-1, last time I checked. It's been eons since their last bout.
@Ventus_the_Heathen5 ай бұрын
- Percy Jackson and Thalia Grace circa 2008
@jimbob30305 ай бұрын
Who's side are you on here? The peoples front of judea or the judean peoples front?
@marcocamaiti2125 ай бұрын
As a biologist, I find this concept of 'divine ecology' and the mutation and evolution of pantheons is fascinating. Really interesting analysis.
@Uhshawdude5 ай бұрын
It really is surprising how seemingly all things that reproduce are subject to evolution by selection. We have a tendency to imagine that the creatures and ideas we have today survived because they were the strongest, when really what endures are the organisms that were adaptable enough to survive when things got bad. Monotheism wasn’t some inevitability, it was the desperate survival strategy of a religion that was in danger of becoming extinct. Just like how human sapience wasn’t the inevitable triumph of evolution, but rather a last-resort adaptation that let our ancestors to survive as arboreal apes who were forced to eke out a living on the open savanna.
@alaricgoldkuhl1555 ай бұрын
@Uhshawdude You can't know this for sure. It's a statement of faith like any other. I will agree with you that special pleading Monotheism or human intelligence is on dodgy epistemological ground, but so too are your "just" statements.
@Uhshawdude5 ай бұрын
@@alaricgoldkuhl155 “Statement of faith” lol no, its a hypothesis. An explanation for a set of observations. All Im really doing is applying the Copernican Principle to religion. The difference between that and faith is that if I find contradictory evidence, I will change my hypothesis, rather than stubbornly clinging to faulty ways of thinking.
@Noobslayar5 ай бұрын
@@UhshawdudeYou seem to be ascribing conscious intent to evolution, when it is a random thing. Things don’t choose to develop new traits, it just happens by mutation.
@Uhshawdude5 ай бұрын
@@NoobslayarI’m actually saying the opposite. People tend to think of humans as the endpoint of evolution, that we are “more evolved” because we are more intelligent than most other animals. Their justification for this is pointing to how successful humans are, and how we’ve dominated the planet. But evolution cannot plan ahead, nor act intentionally as you said. The reason other animals haven’t achieved sapience/ human level intelligence is because it simply wouldn’t be useful to them. Our huge, calorically expensive brains would actually make the vast majority of creatures less fit for their environments. Ive seen convincing arguments that human levels of intelligence, rather than being the pinnacle of evolution, is so uncommon because it’s actually a rather janky strategy, which was only selected for in our ancestors because they lacked any physical adaptations for life in the Sahara as rainforests disappeared millions of years ago. They had a unique mix of ancestral traits (hands, flexible shoulders, sociality, tool use, lack of claws/fangs, slow ground movement) adaptions (bipedalism, loss of fur, smaller jaws), and environmental pressures to encourage the development of advanced tool use and language, which eventually gave us culture. That ended up allowing us to conquer the world, but in its beginning it was just the only thing our ancestors could evolve in a short enough timescale to allow them to survive the transition. Intelligence only looks like the peak of evolution with the benefit of hindsight. Im arguing that the same can be said for monotheism. From our point in history, the rise and dominance of monotheistic Abrahamic religions seems like a natural progression. Religion goes from animism-> polytheism -> monotheism in a nice line of progress. But that’s teleological thinking, and reality is a lot more complicated. As the video shows, Jews didn’t become monotheistic because monotheism is the most advanced and strongest form of religion, they did so because it was the only way to survive as the fringe religion of an small, persecuted minority. The religion evolved much like a species does, individual sects had variability between them, and the ones that made it to the present day were the ones that were most effective at reproducing into the next generation and avoiding extinction. Jewish monotheism just barely avoided extinction, and now its descendants are the largest religions in the world. Meanwhile the religions of the countless powerful empires that dominated and persecuted the Jews are all shadows of their former selves, if not outright extinct.
@roys.18895 ай бұрын
Yo it's the sequel to the episode that got me into Esoterica! I have to watch it now.
@Valdagast5 ай бұрын
Same here.
@thorpeaaron11105 ай бұрын
Same here as well.
@RedWordsFirst5 ай бұрын
I just watched the first one like last week so I’m lucky here lol
@Lalita_Luna5 ай бұрын
Same! Really grateful he decided to tell us more! :3
@merkabbalah5 ай бұрын
Me too!!
@marykayryan78916 ай бұрын
"It's like the Cryps and the Bloods, only Yahweh and B'aal." Jeez you make me laugh!
@Rodlaw995 ай бұрын
Hell yeah like naruto and goku vs vegeta n sasuke ητ´ρ
@tigkokodevlosangeles52075 ай бұрын
Lol 💯
@windigo775 ай бұрын
Jeez is short for Jebez. Are you sure it want to use that name in vain?
@andruloni5 ай бұрын
@@windigo77 in vain? he would 100% approve
@JeffEndersby-zn2rq5 ай бұрын
You see gid tripping is ego tripping ❤❤❤❤
@breadleyj5 ай бұрын
As someone who was raised as a Fundie Christian, I can't say how much I appreciate your videos! I'm very excited for a YHWH series, your videos have helped me deconstruct so much while also embracing my love and appreciation for mysticism, history, theology and the occult. It's been very freeing learning everything from the point of view of mysticism and how that's historically shaped society as we know it today (for better or for worse), versus how I was raised to believe in everything being the Absolute Truth. Very much looking forward to future videos 😄
@saraphicseer59825 ай бұрын
SAME. As a deconstructing exvangelical for the last 15 years or so, Dr.Sledge's educational videos have filled in many gaps and answered so many of the questions I've had that helped me get out of christianism. I hope that all who seek truth find Dr.Sledge's channel.
@cindyinencinitas40825 ай бұрын
I’m the odd man out in my Fundie family, but it’s fun to throw out little tidbits now and then like “Yahweh was a minor storm god until he got a promotion for political reasons.” They just love it. Thanks Dr. Sledge.
@neclark085 ай бұрын
...how did you come to be Liberated from FundieXtianity..?
@samf.s.77315 ай бұрын
Those capitalized A and T are so on point 😊
@chuckliquor36635 ай бұрын
Should check out the lord of spirits podcast sometime. Fascinating breakdowns of pagan and 2nd temple Jewish, as well as early Christian theology. Definitely blows my mind several times an episode.
@PESSIMYST1C5 ай бұрын
This is a solid and concise summary of the origins of biblical monotheism. As someone who’s read and studied both of Mark Smiths books on the subject as well as John Day’s, Frank Moore Cross’s and the Ugaritic mythologies I can say Dr Sledge is truly painting as clear and objective of a picture as I’ve seen of such an amazingly complex and fascinating subject that I have been obsessed with for years Thank you kindly sir
@frankarouet5 ай бұрын
Huge wealth of knowledge shared in a simple way. Indeed. I love this channel.
@PESSIMYST1C5 ай бұрын
@@DavidWalls-sr1pg It sounds a bit like you’re referring to the something similar to the Midianite-Kenite hypothesis maybe? I have read theories that try to place Yahweh’s origins in the ancient volcanic regions of the levant. I’ve also read Nissim Amzalags Yahweh and the origins of ancient Israel which essentially suggests that Yahweh was originally a cult god of the miners and smelters. It could be argued that there is some volcanic language used to describe the theophany of Yahweh in scripture but I would say it’s far less convincing than the scholarly consensus that it’s mostly storm language used…There is certainly a fraternal relationship between ancient Israel, Edom, Moab, and Ammon in the bible and extra biblical sources as well as a potential for Amorite influence on the region we sometimes refer to as Canaan. Just curious, what are your sources to say outright that Yahweh is a Moabite god and a volcanic one at that? I’ve always known Chemosh to be the chief god of Moab and I’m not aware of any reliable information that Yahweh was a minor deity in Moab let alone a volcano god. Thanks for your response
@DavidWalls-sr1pg5 ай бұрын
@@PESSIMYST1C ignoring the volcanic imagery, one can't ignore the tabernacle. Archeological evidence shows us that it is most likely an arabic syle tent temple. Also the ark of the covenant was an Egyptian bark. I feel these must be explained and never are. As far as imagery goes: in the beginning god created the heavens and the earth. To a contemporary audience this would have obviously been about two well known gods and a young upstart named yahweh. "The earth was without form and void" is fighting words. They just said the sacred goddess was baren. "God moved upon the face of the waters and said let their be light." The primordial waters too were powerless and uncreative. This is a direct attack on the sumerian religion and all mesoptamian religions that it cane from. Reading it with sumerian and Egyptian imagery in mind one can clearly see the influence, but it was argumentative and mocking. Yahweh rides the clouds can be seen as plagiarism to academics, but to believers living at the time it would have been highly offensive.
@DavidWalls-sr1pg5 ай бұрын
@@PESSIMYST1C my first reply disappeared. Mostly I am curious why it's never acknowledged that the tabernacle was an Arabian style tent temple.
@PESSIMYST1C5 ай бұрын
@@DavidWalls-sr1pg hmm…maybe take a few minutes and research how similar the description of the tabernacle is to the war tents of the ancient Egyptians in the battle of Qedesh against the Hittites…and how the holy of holes would have occupied the same space as where the pharaoh would have resided…Then look into how the Ugaritic high god El also dwelt in a tent…then simply research how much older the Egyptian civilization is compared to Moab and how much older still the Ugaritic civilization was…
@megweidman18825 ай бұрын
“Yahweh is pretty metal from time to time” has me rolling 😂 Love this channel.
@bunjijumper53455 ай бұрын
I am so confused, if it's clear to him that Judaism was once a religion that believe in more than one god, then became monotheistic why is he Jewish? How can anyone believe a religion knowing it went from polytheism to mono?
@wingset5 ай бұрын
@@bunjijumper5345I guess Judaism can be a cultural ethnicity thing. Or maybe he believes in those deities also. I'm Christian, but I take Jesus as not the same character as yahweh, since he presented a negative view on what yahweh did. Saying that a father would act differently in the same situations.
@codyrockarano52205 ай бұрын
@bunjijumper5345 a good question but once you understand Yahweh was a certain tribes god and they themselves spread monotheism it makes more sense. He is absolutely right though and I love his content. His religion doesn't concern me as long as he spreads truth. I'd be curious to see if he is a Zionist or not as that's a modern movement within Judaism. Knowing what he does I'd wager he is more orthodox in that view.
@bunjijumper53455 ай бұрын
@@codyrockarano5220 I just am trying to understand the logic. I am glad you understood I didnt mean any offense. I mean if a religion claims there is only one God, it seems wild that at one time they believed there were many Gods. The idea of a certain tribes God, as you say in a certain place reminds me of Hinduism because it is also specific to a place. His religion doesnt bother me either, it just seems hard to comprehend that people can literally believe in a faith, and admit that it once was polytheistic. And then still practice that same faith. Certainly the 10 commandments are good rules to live by. It's just perplexing to my brain that he wears the kippa, etc and does other things that are based on something that he basically admits is not true. Thanks for your response.
@mateofamate13875 ай бұрын
@@bunjijumper5345 Technically speaking, any "monotheistic" religion that also believes in demons and angels of some kind would just be the same kind of polytheistic as Hinduism is, the only difference with Hinduism is that worshipping the lower transcendent beings is encouraged, while in Judaism, it's a sin to worship transcendent beings other than the one most supreme, both religions acknowledge the existence of multiple "gods," but one religion makes it clear that only one God ought to be worshipped, while the other gods ought to be cleansed and simply called "demons." We have stories about specific demons and angels with names, just like Hinduism and Hellenism has about different gods, and all of these lesser beings originate from some supreme creator too, Hellenists have Gaia, Hindus have either Vishnu or Brahma, depending on who you ask, Ancient China had Shangdi, and Abrahamic religions have Yahweh, Elohim, Shaddai, and many other names. Demons are thought to have divine intelligence and supernatural powers, so if a demon were to reveal itself to a human, the only thing the human would know is that it's of supernatural origin, and would either assume it's a demon or assume it's a god, either way it's still just an assumption, and we can't really use our sense of fear to tell whether it's a demon or an angel since biblically, both demons and angels can strike fear into the hearts of men. I, as a Christian, believe that some gods of other religions could be real, but that either A. They unknowingly worship the same God as me, we just call Him different names and have different stories about Him, or B. They worship a demon.
@alabamapilot2445 ай бұрын
Monotheism is itself such an interesting cognitive filter. Hard monotheism leaves literally all things good and evil at the feet of one deity. It's a tough thing to worship or follow a being that destroys as easily as it creates. That tension has changed the world over and over again, and I'm always amazed how many practicing monotheists ascribe near Godlike power to satan as a sort of dualistic oppositional god to Adonai. It still seems as though hard monotheism is a bridge too far even today.
@ScotchIrishHoundsman5 ай бұрын
If you get this idea from reading the text itself, you’re either not reading the whole text, or you’re not comprehending what you’re reading.
@alabamapilot2445 ай бұрын
@@ScotchIrishHoundsmanI'm sorry? Which text?
@myfaceismyshield59635 ай бұрын
@@ScotchIrishHoundsmanthere is no one text. There are several monotheistic religions and mythologies..
@10010110110105 ай бұрын
I wouldn't call it a bridge too far as many people do ascribe to monotheism without ascribing a near dualist power to an opposing force, and have for millenia. Be thankful you find it so interesting, because there are so many different writers who do take such a stance that you have plenty of material without reaching the end of it!
@starrmont49815 ай бұрын
I don't think most people think about it that deeply. I come from a pretty religious family and these deep, philosophical discussions simply don't happen.
@a.p.43385 ай бұрын
“it’s always a protection racket, this yahweh stuff,” dr. SLEDGE 💀
@kingeternal_ap5 ай бұрын
Italy, birthplace of popes... ...and mafia
@LIONTAMER3D5 ай бұрын
He "gets it": people have used religion to make money, legally or illegally, going back to the beginning of religion.
@jordandubin5 ай бұрын
All I could think of during the segment on demythologizing the creation story was "in the beginning God created the black and white cookie"
@TheEsotericaChannel5 ай бұрын
And it was good.
@jordandubin5 ай бұрын
@@TheEsotericaChannel another image from later in the episode: "Forget it, Jake. It's Yehudu."
@DavidWalls-sr1pg5 ай бұрын
If you demythologize you miss the point. "In the beginning god created the heavens and the earth." How many gods are mentioned?
@MarshalMarrs-eu9yh5 ай бұрын
@@TheEsotericaChannel wasn’t Yahweh originally a place name?
@eksprolek29243 ай бұрын
@@DavidWalls-sr1pg you are using a trandltion made with the purpose of fitting into monotheism why do you think that's productive. In orginal translstion, elohim did the action. Elohim translates to council of el.
@melissajandres81185 ай бұрын
binge watching your channel I can’t believe I live in a time where I can access academia of this level for free. #feelingblessed
@melissajandres81185 ай бұрын
I will be buying merch off how much I love your content. Thank you professor S
@theeccentrictripper38635 ай бұрын
It might be the single most academically open period in all of human history, we occupy a Cyber-Alexandria that spans the globe, it's borderline miraculous.
@hcfornwalt5 ай бұрын
@@theeccentrictripper3863 Unfortunately it seems these scholarly works are a small fraction of the total increase in available information. They constitute an even smaller fraction of the total increase in consumed information. Even smaller still the fraction of information that lands and is internalized. One can go through 12 years of school, then a 4 year degree and a subsequent PhD or professional degree, and never take a course in rhetoric, logic, statistics, or critical appraisal/analysis. In fact, I'd say that outside of the humanities, most people don't take courses like that at all. Even in some of the humanities, it seems the focus is more on indoctrinating the consensus opinion of the field rather than on training thinkers and investigators. I worry this creates an aversion to nonconfirmatory information. This could make it nigh on impossible for quality scholarship like that summarized here could ever reach and affect a broad enough audience to move the needle. But I'm very glad at least a small corner of the internet, like Esoterica, is making the attempt. If nobody were to try, it would never be possible.
@johngavin14485 ай бұрын
Blessed indeed. Doc's metal references give me life lol. ESOTERICA RULES :)
@DavidKD20505 ай бұрын
I too am massively indebted to this and other similar channels. It indeed is a privileged time to be alive. Sadly the window seems to be closing. Enjoy while we can.
@Lalita_Luna5 ай бұрын
Brother, I swear you're a saint for publicly sharing such critical well founded knowledge in this age of fast spreading misinformation! Bless! Looking forward to the next episode 😊
@lvl.99slime285 ай бұрын
Dr.Sledge your commitment to researching theology in an interesting and accurate manner is appreciated
@juliusnovachrono43705 ай бұрын
As someone who briefly researched the Canaanite Pantheon and is interested in the Kabbalah, this is a great analysis.
@smillstill5 ай бұрын
1)I can see a kind of "they are dead to me" defiance towards foreign gods, much like a parent might say about children they are ashamed of, would lead to a tradition of no gods but the one worthy of respect (Yahwey). 2) Interesting coincidence that after the more-or-less banishment of Asherah from Judaism, Proverbs 1-9 (4th century BCE) and Sirach 24 and 51 (185 BCE), begin praise of Lady Wisdom who is called the Tree of Life. She is later identified with the Spirit of God in the Book of Wisdom/Wisdom of Solomon (c. 1 CE).
@TheEsotericaChannel5 ай бұрын
I've got an Asherah episode up my sleeve and I'll be discussing this sleight of hand with her and the Lady of Wisdom.
@ratamza5 ай бұрын
Would love to hear your take on Margareth Barker's work on that topic.
@smillstill5 ай бұрын
@@Reso-pn7kr It's like I watched a podcast where there were a bunch of people sitting around a table and the subject of astrology came up and people were going around the table saying what their sun sign was and they came to this macho guy on the panel who simply insisted, "I am a man." I'm sure he knew what his sign was, he just denied it's existence as he strongly believed it to be anathema to being masculine (not that I agree) and shameful to acknowledge the existence of astrology as pertinent in any sense.
@smillstill5 ай бұрын
@@Reso-pn7kr Not really what I was getting at, but whatever.
@smillstill5 ай бұрын
@@awakenedaristocrat In classical and modern Judaism. You never found the term before works like the Kabballah, Mishnah, the Talmud, and Midrash, except an allusion in 2 Maccabees. Otherwise, as a concept, it goes back to early Exodus, so was contemporaneous with Asherah from 1200 to 600 BCE.
@MrGksarathy5 ай бұрын
This series is one of my favorites on this channel, especially as a non-Abrahamic person curious about ancient polytheism before God flattened it all out. It's so interesting how the Israelite religion was kind of shaped by being on the periphery and morphing in response to other popular gods or forces beyond their control. I would hesitantly say that there are some similarities between the development of Israelite religion and Hinduism over time, except in the latter case, we ultimately didn't develop an absolute monotheism through negation.
@Xaloxulu5 ай бұрын
Great insight!
@theeccentrictripper38635 ай бұрын
With Indian religion it's fascinating as you had Buddhism negating all of existence, but it was corralled and eventually exiled into wider Asia. It's a look at what could have occurred if the might of the Roman state hadn't taken up the monotheistic Yahweh, transmuted into the Trinity, and undermined polytheistic traditions across the West; the possibilities are truly exhilarating in scope.
@DavidWalls-sr1pg5 ай бұрын
Isn't Brahman God? The one that wants no other gods before him?
@MrGksarathy5 ай бұрын
@@DavidWalls-sr1pg Not really because Brahman describes God in a pantheistic sense. They are one God and every god and all in-between. Different schools of thought have different ideas how that works, but it is not like Yahweh.
@DavidWalls-sr1pg5 ай бұрын
@@MrGksarathy god is pantheistic too, if one wants to see him that way. He is god the father, son and holy spirit, but even in Judaism he is a burning bush, a pillar of cloud or fire etc.
@AkivaMerkavah5 ай бұрын
Another excellent seminar on Yahweh from Dr. Sledge. I've watched the original several times. This channel got me interested in comparative religion despite being myself agnostic verging on atheist.
@jmfana91545 ай бұрын
I got into comparative religion in 2022! Its an amazing deep dive for any curious mind. The Primordial Cosmic Waters thing, for instance, is very very old. Also often tied up with the Serpent/Dragon like Tiamat, Vrtra, Leviathan, ect. Ive perhaps a panpsychism view currently. Ever learning.
@wisconsinengines5 ай бұрын
Hey Justin i really appreciate your effort in putting out weekly content that must be grueling turn-around time for such consistency and it makes my friday. I fell asleeo to a kot of your videos on paternity leave. Do you have any more William Blake in the oven? You implied you were working on more at the end of your Blake video and I'm fascinated by his mythopoeia, plus I feel like his particular brand of anarchism is some sort of starting point for spiritual reconstruction. As a rec, you should check out the band La Armada. They're a dominican punk band now living in chicago, but their sound leans more toward metal I think you'd appreciate. Thank you for always putting these up for free, helps me keep my academic aspirations alive despite the evidence for the fact that I'll never finish my degree lol
@TheEsotericaChannel5 ай бұрын
Yep, more Blake eventually!
@MagklJellyBeanPastelLucidDream5 ай бұрын
You can continue, take tiny steps. No need to fumble, and even if you do! Just get back on your feet, it hurts to slip and fall, but it didn’t kill you. Time to manage what you can!
@bordenfleetwood57735 ай бұрын
As much as you may find this series challenging, Dr. Sledge, we are glad for your efforts. Myself included. Growing up Christian and coming from an anti-denominational family, it always amazed me that the broader Christian religion held this narrative of ancient Isrealites as monotheistic. The books of the prophets literally call out the entire nation on their syncretism constantly, and the court prophets in the employ of the Isrealite kings for being polytheistic. Regardless of modern faith or personal views, and even setting aside the archaeology of the last century, the text of the Hebrew Bible paints a clear picture of a developing religion in constant jeopardy over centuries. It's amazing that it survived at all.
@bodacious66225 ай бұрын
It's easier when the translations deliberately smooth out the text of the Old Testament (so you have a harder time seeing stylistic changes and insertions) and wrongly translate some stuff (the divine assembly, etc.).
@redrix37315 ай бұрын
As a comfortably apostate former evangelical and a passionately practising metalhead, I can only give you the highest praise possible with these sacred words: That Was Awesome Dude!!!!
@alaricgoldkuhl1555 ай бұрын
I was too until relatively recently and think it's a good move. Fatted calf is yummy.🤣
@Mhelyssa_15 ай бұрын
Can we marry? 😂
@Emymagdalena5 ай бұрын
The local divine family of Canaan + the imperialism of Assyria + the cosmology of Zoroastrianism + Greek philosophy= 1 fresh baked monotheism
@generationm20593 ай бұрын
Don't forget the seasonings from the medieval and early modern periods
@hellmannsolis88483 сағат бұрын
Técnicamente hoy el cristianismo católico parce más un henoteismo o monolatria con todos sus santos, ángeles y demonios
@naomiseraphina97185 ай бұрын
This is all too fascinating for words! I love learning about the roots of institutions and belief structures that I was raised to view as rootless, primordial, and eternal. Hearing the possible origins of the monotheistic Yahwist cult really humanizes what to me has always seemed like a real, but inexplicable, boogeyman stalking and menacing the world I've grown up in. Despite growing up in a very conservative Christian family, and learning to read from Bible stories, I've never been able to shake the suspicion that if a creator there be, then obviously we are ALL his/her/their children... right? Yet many would, and do, disagree with that sentiment. I've always wondered how such a militant and narrow view of the divine could have taken root at all, let alone become so damned popular. Thanks to your wonderful scholarship, and your willingness to share your insights, I feel more sympathy now for the people who must have viewed monotheism as a necessary means of retaining cultural identity and solidarity. It doesn't seem as crazy as I once believed it to be, though I can't help wishing that it had mellowed out into something a little more universalist in the years to follow. Ah, well, there's still time to give the whole "universal brother-and-sister-hood of humanity" concept another good, college try, I suppose. It's always a blessing to hear your point of view on a subject, Dr. Sledge, and I can't thank you enough! Many thanks. --N
@Jackkalpakian5 ай бұрын
"By the rivers of Babylon, where we sat down, there we were when we remembered Zion" ... put in context, wonderful.
@thomasschwinn5 ай бұрын
the great Frank Farian knew something
@fishcult606085 ай бұрын
Psalm 137. Read the last lines and see how you feel about that one again.
@Jackkalpakian5 ай бұрын
@@fishcult60608 What makes you think I did not? Checked out my last name?
@fishcult606085 ай бұрын
@@Jackkalpakian iranian? Latin root pax for peace. Idk is there another connotation im just not hip enough to get? I do know bashing babies for revenge is def OT. Maybe this is why there are some who believe jesus was maybe not so much of the OT ways and developed a philosophy to stop the cycle of revenge. I also know that im physically ill by any sort of rhetoric that justifies this but thats just my opinion of course. Its also my opinion that homo sapiens is not the last of the hominid and i hope something evolves that isnt so murderous but only i fear thats only possible if the maniacs dont blow up this beautiful garden planet and leave it a wasteland. My only solace is that even if that happens there are likely other planets that have intelligent life and can also figure out the great mysteries of nature before some stupid maniac blows it all up. Because after all if there is a god who decides about afterlife, why the hell would it let anyone in who has so little regard for the life it and others had? Its most certainly not the god i ever chose to believe in. But like i say. Thats just my opinion. Im ok with my own heresy. Im sad about the likely fate of our world and hope if some of the good things dont survive here maybe they exist or will exist elsewhere. And if all goes well for the eons, it will start all over and not succumb to universal heat death. That one gives me the chills.
@Jackkalpakian5 ай бұрын
@@fishcult60608 Armenian ... been "at the rivers of Babylon" since 1915
@frankarouet5 ай бұрын
You're not "just some guy", Dr Sledge. Your universal curiosity and knowledge come second only to your intellectual generosity. Thank you for this series and for all the other ones.
@chaosspork5 ай бұрын
12:30 "Yahweh would rise to the top of the pantheon, but not without a fight." - I love this line because it gives me huge Shin Megami Tensei vibes. 35:44 "Along with there being chaos monsters inhabiting primordial, uncreated waters." - This fascinates me. The idea of there being horrific monsters that existed before the universe was created is so cool. It would make such a chilling story. I wish there was more detail on what sort of nightmare beasts existed before creation.
@bagodrago5 ай бұрын
Finding out that there are a lot of SMT fans in this comment section is very unsurprising.
@MamulengoBR5 ай бұрын
SMT fans rise up!
@chaosspork5 ай бұрын
Honestly, it makes sense that people who are into SMT would also be interested in mythology
@bjhale5 ай бұрын
The Venn diagram of fans of this channel and those who would appreciate SMT is almost two circles stacked on top of each other.
@JivecattheMagnificent5 ай бұрын
I guess Lovecraft would appeal to you.
@Gruenders3 ай бұрын
Yahweh being understood primarily as a storm God, same as Baal, really brings a lot of context to Christ calming the storms
@MorningStarRevival5 ай бұрын
I cannot say thank you enough for this lecture. As someone who grew up reading the Old Testament and studying Jewish culture and witnessed it being incorporated into Christianity, i am thrilled to have a more detailed and demistifying explination of the foundational shifts and mutations of this religon. It has made it so much easier to remove myself from a deeply harmful and sadistic belief structure, and helped me to root myself in a more "consciousness" based practice. (Believing that everyone's consciousness is cut from the same cloth and that we're all God incarcerated experiencing itself. Thus we are all connected in circle of life that never ends. )
@alaricgoldkuhl1555 ай бұрын
Indeed. We are the Universe made conscious of itself. Not parts of it like the Vedas would have us believe, but the whole thing. Each of us is the Universe. I've recently come back to Christ though. I don't believe He was a historical person, but a revealed one.
@parabalani3 ай бұрын
Your made up belief is not better than Christianity. At least Christianity has real history and logic
@cjdvise2 ай бұрын
@@alaricgoldkuhl155 could you give some further details on your Christ position?
@thecourierNCR2 ай бұрын
"deeply harmful and sadistic" is such a ridiculous stance. You must not know what pain really is.
@artkoenig94345 ай бұрын
Dr. Justin, you may be just "some guy", but you continue to be able to marshal your eloquence in a consistently informative and entertaining manner! Thank you!
@annaaquitaine42255 ай бұрын
I grew up a fundie Christian, and only when digging deep in my beliefs to become a preacher did this fact change, and for better or worse (that’s a joke), I was honest with myself. Let me tell you ESOTERICA is a fantastic recontextualization of some of the beliefs I grew up with. Not sure I’d be open to it if it weren’t for that change. I probably wouldn’t know how to handle the data or care. Now I don’t have a huge point to make with this, aside from adding engagement and expressing my appreciation. Keep killing it, Dr. Sledge, your stuff’s… pretty metal sometimes
@robertsides36262 ай бұрын
Well I didn't vote for him.
@ChupacabraRex2 ай бұрын
It is because he is our father, and as the first father he is the one who started the "this house is not a democracy" tradition, expect his house is the whole world.
@centipede94672 ай бұрын
Great comment lmao
@iandavies339527 күн бұрын
Come and see the violence inherent in the system
@skidooguy7226 күн бұрын
Help Im being repressed!!!!
@abbylennox5 ай бұрын
The details i learn from this channel! This is my favorite thing to put on in the background while cooking. I feel like im getting a free university lecture!!! Many thanks dr sledge
@JasonPSchafer5 ай бұрын
The sequel to the episode that got me fascinated into studying the "esoteric" side of my Christian faith, including the early stages of its formation in gnosticism I had no idea actually had so much influence in the beginning periods like the Patristic Period. Thank you for these well researched and and humorous episodes on all of this typically hard to approach and hard to grasp information. I come from a Methodist background so reason and discernment is important to me so getting to learn about this ancient history that organically shaped and formed the traditions that eventually caused the explosion of what is "God" for all of the Abrahamic religions is a reall fascinating study. I appreciate your candor, yet willingness to take healthy jabs and pokes at everyone, you make it fun and approachable like everyone is along for the ride.
@DadamWrites5 ай бұрын
Religious scholarship vs theology has become fascination of mine. Thank you for your work!
@kidren505 ай бұрын
I'm a very devout Protestant/Christian, believe iand study the bible etc. and I absolutely love these videos you make on Yahweh. I love to understand the more historical/archeological side of my relegion and try to work the relation between the evidence brought by the religion and the ones outside of the religion. It's challenging sometimes, and there are aspects that are simply a mystery, and that's what I love about it. Feels like I'm trying to put together the lore of a Dark Souls game. One could think this would challenge my faith and make me not believe anymore, but it's kind of the opposite to me.
@SeanRichards_a5 ай бұрын
I remember that phase! I was in college. Its the one right before atheism. Safe Journey
@kidren505 ай бұрын
@@SeanRichards_a I've thought about it before. But I've been in this rabbit hole for some 4 or 5 years now. I can't tell the future of course, but I don't see myself becoming an atheist. I'm overall very secure on my beliefs, and everytime I get into subjects like these, I find my self even more enthusiastic about going deeper both in my faith and studying stuff like in this video. And as Is aid, there absolutely are moments that it challenge's me, and points some possible contradictions, but somehow that makes the process fun and interesting to me.
@RobDaCajun5 ай бұрын
@@kidren50 very well said. I’m in a similar place. It hasn’t lead me to atheism. I interpret these things as us coming to grasp the infinite as a finite species. That God accepts us calling us Yahweh for us to conceptualize him.
@scribeofsolace5 ай бұрын
@@SeanRichards_a lol
@ginalangston94285 ай бұрын
@kidren50 I love this response. I relate completely. Observing others bad marriages only brings more gratitude as the bride of a husband who fills my soul with unshakable security. That kind of faithfulness in marriage isn't natural, it is however supernatural. Blessings from Charleston,SC
@ScottF935 ай бұрын
Thanks! Massive fan Dr. Sledge. You bring a strict scholarly perspective to subjects that rarely receive it. Can't get enough of your videos!!
@swhopkinson5 ай бұрын
You take a complex and contested ancient process and lay it out is clearly as possible - without pretending its the one reading or can be known with any real certainly. Fantastic work. The previous one was good too.
@harryhoofcloppen5 ай бұрын
WOW… what an astonishing amount of research it took to make this happen! Kudos!
@modernism1005 ай бұрын
A tour de force presentation that is highly detailed, nuanced, persuasive and passionately argued. Whereever our beliefs intersect with the material here, we are educated and provided a historical framework. Thank you again, Dr. Sledge.
@tobiasquinn16555 ай бұрын
Thank you for this episode... I have been looking for someone to do a deep analysis on this subject. My favorite channel find so far in years. Keep up the good work, A fellow Historian, -TJQ
@rebaivs1895 ай бұрын
You have no idea how thankful I am of every second you spent into reading a book, article, watching conferences, attending conferences, hours of research to make this video happen. I am an atheist but I thank god for your work, it's helped me rationalized parts of my life that religion left in shambles, and give a sense of redeeming my days of religious fanatism. Thanks Justin!
@nicolecook13485 ай бұрын
Ex JW here and this is very enlightening
@LenaNicoletteRose5 ай бұрын
Same! ^-^
@eternalbattle14385 ай бұрын
JW is a sect, a heresy at best.
@illiiilli246015 ай бұрын
The parallels with what JWs called the covenant, God's chosen people, and other concepts with concepts mentioned in this video is deeply fascinating
@oldbiker97395 ай бұрын
same here very interesting we been bamboozled by imaginary gods😂🤣
@SweetAzsk8sАй бұрын
Alot of JWs and exJWs are watching this and it's enlightening af, sad that most will turn a blind eye at the truth of biblical analytical study in favour of being lead to the slaughter by a bunch of manipulative greedy few intent on making money off their ignorance, while promising them everlasting life on a paradise earth. Dgmw, I believe in God and universal creator, but if biblical doctrine is to be taken into account, it doesn't matter how you acknowledge God personally, or what it's name is, just remember that God exists and cares about it's creation on a deeper level we could ever imagine. Peace be with you friends ✌🏽🥰
@rafalapolanski5 ай бұрын
Again, absolutely mesmerizing and interesting topic. Thank you very much. I must confess, your "programs" became a staple of my weekly rutine, which makes them ever so much importnat. Looking forward to the next episode on YHVH, Will dive into Smith's material, as I am not sure about "unavoidabliity" of monotheistic conclusion. Maybe I even report back...
@dawsonfoster67455 ай бұрын
Òw
@insanity424 ай бұрын
Watching this and the previous video Yahweh reminds me of Terry Pratchett's Discworld series in which the gods of Discworld need believers in order to exist and do reinvent themselves in order to continue to retain believers.
@kevscounsel5 ай бұрын
This is so deep. I had to pause 30 minutes in to catch my breath. Haha. Great lecture, Justin.
@benlap19775 ай бұрын
My take away from this is that politics deeply influence theology, and far more than i ever imagined. It's projecting into the heavens our own reality.
@phillipbernhardt-house69075 ай бұрын
Excellent as always! As I said about your last video on Yahweh: I wish this had been available six years ago, when a real jerk (a fundamentalist Christian minister) tried to get me fired over suggesting--contrary to what our World Civilizations textbook said--that monotheism was not the norm amongst the early Judeans/Israelites. But, that's a story in itself (sadly!).
@Ouranos3695 ай бұрын
Ministers straight up lie to their congregation and they're encouraged to do so because they learn this stuff at seminary school.
@f34rbeast325 ай бұрын
If you don’t mind me asking, what happened and the outcome?
@phillipbernhardt-house69075 ай бұрын
@@f34rbeast32 It's a long story...but, in an online World Civilizations class, because I suggested the textbook wasn't actually teaching history at that point but instead was distorting it to fit theological ideologies, the minister (who was the parent of a student in the class...but she was an adult, living away from home, and married!) sent a letter to me; our department chair at the time refused to acknowledge it, so I was left to deal with it. Our vice president required me to respond, and the minister kept moving the goal posts, and wanted to meet with me, but I refused because he wouldn't be changing his mind, and I wouldn't alter my tactic of teaching actual history rather than his preferred theological version of it. He continued to write harassing e-mails to me until I stopped responding. He then accused me of discriminating against Jews, Muslims, and Christians and tried to get me fired (when, in fact, his daughter sent me one e-mail, it wasn't about this nor anything related to it, and got an A in the class...so, where's the evidence of discrimination there?). The college took his complaint, even though he had no standing to make it (and narrowly avoided a defamation suit by me!), didn't allow me to be at the meeting where this was discussed with the minister, nor did they acknowledge that they were violating my academic freedom as well as the fact that my "version" was actually history as acknowledged by actual experts nowadays and therefore not in any way in error, and then at the end of the meeting, were told by the minister that they all needed to "remember who the majority is in this country" when dealing with situations like this. Supposedly, no note of this went into my record in HR; however, the dean and vice president that were at the meeting were both instrumental in denying me promotion over the next few years, and in my eventual situation of being permanently laid off. In any case, that was the situation, in brief. While Dr. Sledge's videos would have helped (or, at least one hopes they would have!), this guy was probably never going to change his mind or actually be educated on this matter (nor would it have helped in showing the college admins that they were making serious mistakes in how they dealt with this entire situation...which might even have been more than mistakes and were outright illegal), because if Yahweh wasn't always and forever the one and only God, then his entire theology would break down...and we can't have that, now, can we?
@davidm54155 ай бұрын
considering that one of the Old Testament’s biggest themes was the fact that the Israelites worshipped idols nearly the entire time… finding out that they were polytheistic in the 21st century is *not really a surprise*. In fact, finding this out through archaeological means and not simply through the words in the Bible… PROVE IT!
@phillipbernhardt-house69075 ай бұрын
@@davidm5415 To anyone who is reasonable, educated, intellectual, certainly...but, there are some people that aren't, and never will be because they refuse to be. This minister was in that category, which is truly sad...and he decided to make my life hell for it, and almost got me (and another faculty member) fired for it because we dared to question his "faith" with our history and facts. (And we didn't actually seek to undermine his faith, and said nothing about it...but he felt offended and attacked by presenting the facts, and...well, you read the rest of the story.)
@jbaquinones6 ай бұрын
I’m getting into Greek stuff. It’s so awesome so peer into the minds of the creators of our religions and see through their bs. I find it useful to skim through the bs and appreciate the lessons and history. Thank you Sir. ❤
@Min-EnBrianWu-gl6bv5 ай бұрын
As an East Asian who had no background in those kinds of history, I really appreciate your video has widened my perspective!
@valviform25 күн бұрын
"Mortal Kombat, but for the gods." I present to you: Immortal Kombat
@michaelo56655 ай бұрын
Thank you Dr. Sledge. This channel is a treasure trove.
@TheEsotericaChannel5 ай бұрын
Consider Supporting Esoterica! Patreon - www.patreon.com/esotericachannel Paypal Donation - www.paypal.me/esotericachannel Merch - kzbin.info/door/oydhtfFSk1fZXNRnkGnneQstore New to Studying Esotericism? Check out my Reading Guide here - docs.google.com/document/d/1caKNlW7sogEF7lAeYNbOQF9pt5O5b70yAXa-icUJO3o/edit
@generalmazur5 ай бұрын
Esoterica! at the Seminary
@MrDalisclock5 ай бұрын
I'm glad to have a good distillation of Smith's work. It's really good, but it's also really dense and difficult for most people to easily read. Also, thanks for your hard work, Dr. Sledge. That was great.
@nicolasmeinen30553 ай бұрын
Describing how monotheistic Yahweh theology came about sort of 'unwillingly' in the mode of dialectical negation & ending with 'this has somehow become a Yahweistic series, not planned' is the cherry on the cake. The power of the becoming of the God is such that not only it forced itself into "early" theology, it also forced itself into the best KZbin series, too! Gotta give kudos to YHWH. (but mostly to you, of course! amazing video as always)
@StevenSheridan314165 ай бұрын
Um, this could actually be my favorite video of all time. And I'm a KZbin junkie. I don't want to know how many thousands of videos I've seen. Look, Dr. Sledge, it ain't JUST your fantastic delivery making this my perhaps-favorite. You're working with some damn good ingredients here. The narrative is fascinating and unpredictable; on a human-interest level, there's so much to wonder about and learn from how this all went down. The consequences of Yahweh's development, needless to say, have been world-defining. The scholarship has surely been appallingly meticulous. And the capstone on all of this was a presentation that was compelling, thorough-yet-concise, and downright relatable. That one's all you, Dr Sledge.
@StevenSheridan314165 ай бұрын
Lemme just spin this thing up from the beginning again
@mfpump5 ай бұрын
I’ve battled with the north/south kingdom conflict for some time and tried to understand the separation. Then the yhwh /el split hit me and made so much sense
@TheHolandos5 ай бұрын
New Esoterica video means an excellent excuse for a coffee break. Thank you for the astounding quality of your content.
@samf.s.77315 ай бұрын
Yeah I made coffee too 😆
@roys.18895 ай бұрын
Oh yeah Doc, after rewatching this video a few times to make sure I got your point you made me realize something: One of the reasons why Abrahamic religions really took off is down to the fact that Abrahamic religions trace their ancestry to the fragmented, oppressed, and disenfranchised people of the ancient Israelite polity. Their religion and its history with Imperialism and colonialism echoed in the imperialism and colonialism in the centuries to come. I mean it's not the only reason why Abrahamic religions are now so widespread, but my intuition is telling me it's not pure coincidence.
@johannageisel53905 ай бұрын
Also: What kind of god is a better fit for an expansive, conquest-centered ideology than a warrior storm-god. It seems that the idea of Jahwe being kind never became dominant - it's still the warrior ideology that prevails in these religions.
@roys.18895 ай бұрын
@@johannageisel5390 kind of a back and forth huh? On the one hand El's Mercy appeals to the oppressed peoples of the world, while Storm Yahweh brings the suffering.
@johannageisel53905 ай бұрын
@@roys.1889 Yes. Storm Yahwe appeals to the ones who want to take other people's land and force their religion upon them.
@Alan_Duval5 ай бұрын
@@roys.1889 The old one/two.
@misc.cont.5 ай бұрын
I came across your channel a couple of weeks ago and have been binging on your videos every evening, particularly the stuff about John Dee. Last weekend I realised I’m only 20 mins away from the British Museum and seeing some of the stuff you’ve shown, in-person. Watching this video and seeing the black obelisk, I literally just did the Leonardo DiCaprio, pointing at the screen meme, alone in my flat. I’m going to go back tomorrow and take a closer look at it. Thanks so much for your vids, I’ve already gotten so much from them and feel like I’ve barely started.
@davidsantana42765 ай бұрын
Fantastic video as always Dr. Sledge. Thank you for releasing so much good content, it has been a huge influence on my ideas and perspective lately, and helped me think about my own religious tradition and skepticism in radical, different ways. Looking forward to the next episodes!
@Bjorn8305 ай бұрын
This is hugely interesting to me. I grew up in a family that was firmly in the "Every word of the Bible is literally true," camp, and was always disturbed at the logical inconsistencies this idea created. I would have liked the religion much more if it still had a warrior storm god.
@DavidWalls-sr1pg5 ай бұрын
He was a moabite volcano god. The problem with most people is that they don't read the Bible properly. You must understand sumerian religion.
@alexpipkin31765 ай бұрын
Seeing Justin is doing another episode on Yahweh; "Oh boy, oh BOY, OH BOY! Ladies and gentlemen, here we go!"
@HoopsKevinski.2 ай бұрын
Started as a thunder god... like Jupiter/Zeus and Thor? And funny, we *STILL* say "let God strike me with ⚡"!!
@HoopsKevinski.2 ай бұрын
Thunder god prolly won out because as someone here in comments quoted Dr Sledge saying: "it was a protection racket", *and* thunder was most powerful force known. Maybe Ouranos (Uranus) beats Jupiter/Zeus if they knew about, and could imagine him wielding asteroids. (But then, asteroids are also like nukes, when sometimes you just need to zap one person.)
@ChupacabraRex2 ай бұрын
@@HoopsKevinski. I'd say that a very important thing is that asteroids weren't actually historically recurrent disasters, while giantic storms are. I'd also say that another thing is that storms are not wholly dependent on lightning; on the contraty, lightning causes tremendous yet highly personal damage with the incredibly powerful winds and especially floods being the ones to destroy all the buildings. Even in modern-day mexico, I can say as someone from guadalajra it is not uncommon for the streets to get flooded during the rainy reason. And yet, a lack of rain or rain which is in some way intoxicated like acid rain is just as bad if not worse than the tremendous floods and storms due to to the terrible famine that comes with it, that slow and dreadful death. Without the seasonal rainy season, millions would die all through mexico and a national crisis would happen, a path that the unpredictable weather that global warming seems to be bringing closer to reality in many regions. A sky god was and is of vast importance, in my opinion at least, due to the close relationship betweeen rain and crop production, with thunder and lighting being particular due to showcasing not a widespread distaster but a particular, personal, damage.
@MsJocelynC5 ай бұрын
“Just how did Yahweh become “God?” …well sir, he had excellent PR 😂 looking forward to the episode 🥰
@kingeternal_ap5 ай бұрын
I don't think babylonian exile was a popular PR move, but oh boy, didn't It Just work?
@MsJocelynC5 ай бұрын
@@kingeternal_ap 😂
@markrodriguez21325 ай бұрын
@@kingeternal_ap All part of the plan.😆
@helly90275 ай бұрын
LOVE this series on Yahweh. I cannot wait for you to cover Ashera. I have always thought that the Holy Spirit somehow evolved from her. I feel like it was originally a female or female coded. Idk. I can't wait to find out! Thank you SO MUCH for all your hard work and putting hard scholarship into language I can understand as a non scholar.
@piknikker4 ай бұрын
It's amazing how you subtly open people up for the truth.
@TheEsotericaChannel4 ай бұрын
Huh?
@piknikker4 ай бұрын
@@TheEsotericaChannel Well there is a whole history around Yawheh, where most Rabbis try to stay away from. But when you know, you will see Yahweh differently. But you share it in a way that it doesn't rub anyone's feathers.
@TheEsotericaChannel4 ай бұрын
Again, huh?
@SallyImpossible5 ай бұрын
Great stuff. Always excited to see your videos pop up.
@patrickholt22705 ай бұрын
It just makes sense. Firstly because it is the cosmological reality, and thus was immanent in polytheism, at the back of people's minds even if subconsciously. Once the idea was first aired, or asserted, it grew to be irresistible, because it not only simplifies ritual and spirituality, meaning you only have to remember one name for everything, and don't have to worry about neglecting gods to appease by accident or conflicts between the spheres of influence and ideological priorities of different deities, but it suddenly opened up the possibility of a much deeper and more personal spirituality in relationship with one particular deity who is all sufficient. He can be, counter-intuitively enough, a much more personal god than the many gods of polytheism who had very limited remits and a general sense of abstraction about them because of it, that most of the time they wouldn't be listening and any attention they might give would be on an uncaringly transactional basis. And finally, because he was not just the deity of some particular phenomena and professions, he could be referred to directly for final moral guidance and pursuit of justice. Whereas in the polytheisms there is a god for everything, including all kinds of conduct, and it was therefore difficult to find agreement on a code of moral and ethical instruction, no matter the good work of philosophical schools within those religious systems which they were part of - as the Hindu philosophical schools are still part of overall Hinduism today - if there is one God who is the Creator and the judge of souls, it becomes impossible that he should not have specific guidance on that front, and that it be of final authority. Equally importantly, and attractively, it is impossible that such a deity should be satisfied with the corruption, inequality, exploitation, oppression and avoidable suffering in human society, given that care for all human beings is a logical necessity of being the Creator. So such a deity can become the revolutionary-in-chief, the divine whistleblower and inciter of resistance to injustice, despite any apparent contradictions with also being invoked as the basis of all existing earthly authorities. The pursuit of justice, and the identification of existing human societies as unjust also being immanent and at the back of people's minds, since it is the socio-economic and socio-political reality, and requiring a religious revolution (and divine revolutionary) to advance, because of the habit of polytheistic civic religions to legitimize the existing class systems and power hierarchy. To that extent, the place and time in which the concept was first declared in written history (it is claimed that monotheism is the original cosmology normal to hunter-gatherers) can be accidental, and can evolve out of an obscure thunder deity of an obscure people for whom he was their only distinctive deity, especially once the benificent attributes of other deities and praise songs about them, get re-ascribed to the one God who is judge and creator. The process not only increases that deity's attractiveness, but it adds to the sense-making and depth of the spirituality. The God again becomes more personal, more good and more important to develop relationship with, in becoming more specified in terms of personality and extent of care.
@SirCoughsalot5 ай бұрын
Giving me chills around the 53 minute mark. This is the content I'm here for.
@derekschmidt57052 ай бұрын
I really appreciate how easy you made it to digest all this really good information. Thanks so much
@TestHandlePleaseIgnore5 ай бұрын
I love learning about the history of pre-Judaism as it's the history of my ancestors. I had always thought our monotheism was a result of cultural exchange and whatnot. But hearing from scholars, including you Dr. Sledge, that Yahweh became the sole god of the exiles because there were no other gods left to worship is quite the humbling thing to take in. It certainly explains our seemingly ingrained and oft-reinforced resistance to other gods. None of the others were there for our ancestors, only our G-d was there for us. EDIT: I'm an atheist/apatheist so for me this is more of a cultural revelation than anything else. Would this make Yahweh an exile of sorts as well?
@chansesturm71035 ай бұрын
Can we all just take a moment to appreciate just how good a storyteller Dr. Sledge is? Every time I click on one of his videos, the introduction captivates me like nothing else. The man doesn't just give a lecture meant to educate like some others in this niche (absolutely *no hate whatsoever* for those others, like Religion For Breakfast et al., I love 'em to bits), he weaves an absolute _tapestry_ of a tale!
@theparalexview7855 ай бұрын
Well done. Great summary of the materials (some of which I've skimmed). That hour went by quicker than I'd expected from the topic.
@chaosspork5 ай бұрын
These videos are fascinating! I love learning about the history of Yahweh and monotheism. Thank you so much for making these!
@sirwaldo9995 ай бұрын
Such a deep dive it will take me several viewings to get your info all straight in my head. Thank you teacher, 🙏
@RobertButterfield-n4m5 ай бұрын
Dr. Sledge, you are so much more than just "a guy!" Your insight, your knack of seeing the big picture, your clarity of expression- these are gifts you possess in abundance! Prester Bob
@ScruffySus5 ай бұрын
He said Yahweh is metal then said his name is Dr Sledge. Def subscribing.
@MariaVosa5 ай бұрын
I was really hoping you'd continue to cover this fascinating topic. I remember having my mind blown when I studied history of religion and realised large parts of the "old testament" were clearly written by people that were not monotheists. I didn't learn about the cultural and historical contexts though, so this was very inspiring!
@Twinkaholic5 ай бұрын
Dr. Sledge back with another excellent video!
@ChipSuey2075 ай бұрын
Dr. Sledge, I just want to say thank you for all your content and this channel. I feel like I've found my people, as someone who grew up in evangelical churches (with parents who were part of the 70's charismatic christian movement) but always had an interest in the arcane and weird and was unsatisfied with the "answers" the church had for me. Went through the usual "radical atheist" phase before age and just being alive made me soften that quite a bit, and now I'm back to something resembling Robert Anton Wilson's "Maybe Logic" (I know RAW wasn't exactly a "serious" scholar or anything, but I've got a soft spot for him).
@LarryGarfieldCrell5 ай бұрын
What is the story of Exodus and the plagues if not "my God can totally beat up your god"? Yahweh beats up Pharoah (the Egyptian demigod) 10 times, so badly that we still brag about it every spring.
@jamiegallier21065 ай бұрын
Amazingly brilliant presentation. This is the quickest and most thorough I’ve seen this covered- bravo!❤
@PierceArner5 ай бұрын
Really been looking forward for this one for a long time, so thanks a ton for continuing in on this particular topic/series.
@TheRobSaint5 ай бұрын
You don't know how "that happened", a series on Yahweh, brother! It NEEDED to happen. This is so well done and informative. Mazel tov!
@kaptainwarp5 ай бұрын
The Golden Calf is another god that's "pretty metal"...
@johannageisel53905 ай бұрын
Lol. ^ ^
@shawncoleman85305 ай бұрын
I see what you did there!
@thebanished875 ай бұрын
It's metal as fuck
@alanpennie80135 ай бұрын
I doubt it ever was a god. It was probably a lowly servant of Yahweh like the cherubim in Solomon's Temple.
@Aquamarine3332 ай бұрын
This would be great in podcast form!!
@MissAynneK5 ай бұрын
All your videos are so well researched and interesting, and the origins of Yahweh are my favourite so far. Thanks for sharing your knowledge!
@leiaorgana436Ай бұрын
I’ve been looking for scholarship of this quality for a long time and am so pleased to have stumbled across your channel. I have books but sometimes you want to listen to a good lecture, and I’ve enjoyed Christine Hayes’ Yale course most often. Thank you for the in-depth lecture and accompanying graphics. I hadn’t known about the cuneiform inscriptions from the Babylonian Jewish communities-such a treat to see them. Will be donating and following. Thanks again.
@ODR965 ай бұрын
Thank you for making this video. This is the most comprehensive consolidation of information on this subject I have ever seen. ReligionForBreakfast made an excellent video on this topic as well, but this really goes into so much detail. I will be referring back to this video for many years to come.
@mikeimbrogno41502 ай бұрын
I can't get enough of your channel. Thank you for putting all this great stuff up!
@sproins5 ай бұрын
Definitely gonna be some sane and reasonable comments down here.
@scottygordon32805 ай бұрын
This is the series I've needed...Thank you for all the amazing work you do. Hopefully I'll find some time to read those sources you mentioned in between my grad school research 🙃
@Dreoilin5 ай бұрын
This follow up video was brillant. Thank you for your hard work putting these videos together.
@tyrionstark5 ай бұрын
Casually drops an Omar reference while talking about Yahweh. I love it.
@spleenjacobson2035 ай бұрын
Incredible video Dr. Sledge, I am going to have to rewatch this one a few times to really get it. Also, it occurs to me that the theological negation inherent to creating monotheism is the same process inherent to what I’d refer to as “hard” atheism.
@kirillzapple3 ай бұрын
One of the best Esoterica episodes I've seen this year. 👏
@axiomguy5 ай бұрын
“You’re just one god away”. This had me rolling on the floor. Must have been your perfect dry delivery 😂love it