EtherChannel - Load Balancing and Misconfiguration Guard

[@fisnet0]

Simple and direct to what matters. Excellent content!

[@thompsonpaulus5450]

Thanks for the explanation.

[@MauroSedrani]

Great explanation, as usual! Thanks!

[@HongeraGideon]

Perfect

[@FerdsTechChannel]

Great video. Thanks!

[@rahulrahulpm2900]

Nice explanation I have one question How ether channel will going to adjust the load balance if two links goes down. It would really helpful if you could provide the answer.

[@mohamedhadjmimoune8665]

awsome

[@ceo4eva]

Hi, so when you say use a dynamic protocol for ether channel, are you saying that the whole PO wouldn't have been err-disabled if a dynamic ether channel was configured? So ether channel misconfig is only for static POs?

[@CharlesJudd]

Yes, you are correct. If you are running LACP or PAgP, the interface would be removed from the bundle and set to independent mode, and spanning-tree would sort things out to make sure the port channel is still operational. That's one reason why it's recommended that we use LACP or PAgP.

[@djtk808]

So I actually want no load balancing, rather force all traffic to use one link and leave the other link only as a backup. Is this possible to configure?

[@kwallaceccie]

Yes indeed. Interestingly, that’s the behavior you have by default thanks to Spanning Tree Protocol (STP). Enjoy your studies!

[@hansthepeter]

i'm a fanboy already 😁

[@toofanjavadian6319]

fascinating 😍

[@Mowntandewey]

That's a good looking bottle of bourbon you got there.

[@shahidrashid6740]

Dear sir please change font and background