Euro NCAP Crash & Safety Tests of Kia Sportage 2022

[@boeing777xfan3]

How can u use tuscon for pedestrian impact they have different bumpers

[@Christian17390]

Because the Tucson and the Sportage have the same platform, which was stated at the beginning of the video!

[@anthonybakos9848]

@@Christian17390 He didn’t say they weren’t he said the bumper structure is different we will definitely affect the pedestrian impact!

[@MatthewBrandon1]

How can you use a different model for tests? There are full sportage tests for us 2023. Only the SXP and xlines have top Aretha ratings due to all the extra safety features. The others have lower scores.

[@RagnetulCarpatilor]

Good results but this Kia and Hyundai are the only cars I've seen that pieces of interior trim fly off, you don't want them going into your face or other places in the case of a crash.

[@wesleyt2896]

Kia, but they use the tucson for some parts because they are sister companies and cars. Sportage and Tuscon are build on the same platform, same tech, engines and safety features. Like a VW Tiguan and Seat Ateca. Or Peugeot 208 and Opel Corsa

[@arnauregot]

Kia are the best Suv in the world. ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@Med1um_Gamer]

this is uglyer car in the world , and useless car in the world

[@efebektas3307]

@@Med1um_Gamer en işe yaramaz araba wolksvagen Tiguan 💩kia çok daha iyi

[@BeratGozcu19]

​@@efebektas3307bence de

[@raphaelkhairallah1518]

No not every Kia and Kia’s just the best SUVs in the world😢😢😢

[@zandioldjohn5203]

How Dare you Take Tiguan Away from Me!!!!!

[@airsoft7008]

1:12 that bullet comming off from the bottom is very dangerous

[@paqalodniq]

2:02 What the melody?

[@David_H-73]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/qpinfounbc59rMUsi=qjDZObrlE7Njszf6

[@carlosdelfa6428]

This vídeo is test Tucson or Sportage? Sportage and Tucson are seen in the vídeo.

[@thevalidsimmer]

the tuscon and sportage share the same platform and some safety features, so some results will be based off of those of the tuscon.

[@eerolz8758]

Impressive that you've learned to write without knowing how to read.

[@mariano4762]

What configuration was on this car? PHEV, HEV, ICE? There is a 350kilograms difference between them

[@francousmiani1234]

Believe me, no anti crash system saves a tiny spine from that force, if not death, you won't escape permanent disability in a serius car accident.

[@santiagojacome7618]

Es el mismo full equipo que venden en Latinoamérica?

[@YaKsster96P6]

No, cambian motorizaciones y equipamiento, el ensamble tampoco es el mismo pero no me creas a mi, investiga en Google, la versión europea no es la misma de la india

[@99solutionsit10]

Crisis unfolded: only few cars to crash tests, the information is "transferred" from simblings. 🙄

[@othman0077]

Nice seems reliable

[@DoorisJ]

That wrong way message looks like a glitch?

[@ytuberization]

Compared to the BMW i4 this looks like a chewing gum in the pole test but received 5 vs. 4 stars? EuroNCAP tests are becoming more erratic…

[@andreimihailescu6805]

The rating is higher based on what trauma the occupants have not the car. If the car is intact but the occupants dead there is no use... just buy old lada if you think that way.

[@ytuberization]

@@andreimihailescu6805 If a tree is going through your head you can’t really speak about an advantage. EuroNCAP is interpreting ONLY the results in ONE specific scenario: The test does not reflect or extrapolate to higher crash speeds. Be ensured that at +10km/h crash speed the results would be totally different. Maybe you have a more “comfortable” crash at 40km/h, but will be dead at 50km/h… And no: A Lada has absolutely no rigid structure. It will totally collapse in such tests.

[@emilsohn1671]

@@ytuberization lol, care to explain a little further how NCAP doesn't know how to test cars? You do know the i4 got 4 stars mainly because BMW suck at including safety equipment as standard as they like to have it as (very) expensive extras. Granted, all carmakers want you to pay for the safety equipment but some make it available in the most basic trims which is always what NCAP tests - the basic trim. And it is evident that the koreans are pretty good at including proper electronic safety tech even in basic trims. And yes, it is embarrasing that a Hyundai Tucson has more and/or better electronic safety measures in it than a basic trim BMW i4 in its basic trim, but it is the reality of today. Asian cars are becoming better at a rate that should have european manufactorers upset. People like to talk about hardware I guess, but in the field of software, wouldn't surprise me one bit of the koreans match or exceed the germans in that regard. As for the crash test itself, no you cannot eyeball it and make any conclusions on that. No serious engineer works that way. NCAP do consider all the things you accuse them of not considering, appearantly because you didn't like the result the i4 got. Tell you what, putting on show BMWs two recent "duds" is a good thing, not a bad one. It is what is going to force BMW to accept becoming the new Peugeot in safety - that is, one that slanders behind - or improving upon it to the level that it matches its competitors.

[@maroan3607]

Side impact was Hyundai Tucson NOT KIA !

[@japanquakeytp]

same brand same platform same car

[@hoji7765]

​@@japanquakeytp?

[@adrianromero92]

1:14 OMG Very bad

[@osmanyildiz8318]

Kia ?

[@zambesis]

This test doesn't make any sense to me. Why are you using 2 different cars???

[@jaisejacob4516]

Read the description

[@SiiliViin]

How on earth this thing got 5 stars, when side pole test bendt whole thing!? Also, why this test is based on Hyundai model, but mercedes van you tested mercedes, not based on Reanult?

[@emilsohn1671]

It gets 5 stars because NCAP assess how well the driver is protected, not how the impact absorbtion zones look. I am by no means an expert, just a layman, but sometimes crumbling of specific parts can even be intentional to absorb the energy and direct it away from the passengers. Doesn't matter of the car looks like shit as long as it directs the energy of impact away from the poor sod's spine. NCAP use sensors to meassure damage done to the dolls. They also look at the hull to make inferences about the cars performance real life.

[@SiiliViin]

@@emilsohn1671 Every time I write this under EuroNCAP test, someone writes this text back. Have you noticed, this test speed is 32 km/h? If it looks very bad at this low speed, then at 64 km/h same crash, this thing splits into two halves and all will be dead. EuroNCAP problem is, they turned into woke and do not test real safety anymore. All electronic gizmos are more important now, than real security.

[@Aaronduhmoron]

@@SiiliViin I agree with you but maybe a pole impact at 60km/h is less realistic because of it being just a pole. I think a vehicle going that fast is more likely. The mobile barrier impact at 60km/h right before it which seems more realistic.

[@volkhen0]

Sportage and Tucson are the same cars.

[@NextGenGamer1]

It's intentional and it's part of the crash structure. If you don't watch Formula 1, new formulas are extremely safe but they dramatically dissolve into pieces during a crash on purpose to spread the g forces and protect the human as much as possible. It might look scary and bad, but it's intentional and it's gonna make you safer

[@mharoonrs]

I saw a Hyundai Tucson in this test. 1:01, 2:03, 2:23 and possibly more 😅

[@eerolz8758]

Impressive, now learn to read :P

[@mharoonrs]

I started reading after noticing the Tuscan 😅😂

[@eerolz8758]

@@mharoonrs Good, then read the text in description or the first 5sec of the video.. Also, not hard to notice when it reads on the screen when Hyundai was used.

[@mharoonrs]

@@eerolz8758 Well I noticed and commented because it doesn't match the video title though. I didn't read the description. I was randomly scrolling the videos. I still haven't read the video description for your information.

[@yaqout]

ماعلاقة هيونداي بكيا

[@Matthew-yc6nx]

Hyundai owns Kia

[@themixchannel1816]

Only for high end markets .. Forget about it in Latin America or India

[@licalupu7675]

This is Hyundai Tucson, not Kia Sportage.

[@mehdimehdiyevofficial313]

*Allahın salamı və rəhməti üzərinizə olsun.**Allahın salamı və rəhməti üzərinizə olsun.*

[@Trinny1751]

0:10 0:35 1:01 1:23

[@Bigi444444]

Why are modern cars so bad at side pole tests?

[@sbomorse]

The Toyota Aygo has better active safety ratings and it's AEB system is better than this 😳

[@ОлександрІвасик-и5о]

На мою думку в стовп пройшов погано

[@berademirdogen]

amogus

[@eightyone8071]

Sus

[@vnikitin1212]

Kia Tucson?😂😂😂😂

[@alsove]

Omm

[@rrange]

Why is there a clip of a Hyundai Tucson? Why doesn’t Kia have knee airbags?

[@natteharry391]

Cause they're basicly the same cars built on the same platform, only with diffrent styling.