Euro NCAP Crash & Safety Tests of Mercedes-Benz T-Class 2022

[@Alex-ci8hn]

2:55 rip le mannequin

[@SiiliViin]

What is the point to test Citan & T-class both as they are same car? Hull is same, so safety is also same.

[@MaticTheProto]

It isn’t

[@09RadBoy]

What I don’t understand, is that you didn’t crash the Renault Arkana or Dacia Jogger, but you did this?

[@thevalidsimmer]

The Arkana is built on the same platform and has the same safety equipment and base structure as the Captur, tested in 2019. The Jogger is built on the same platform and has the same safety equipment and base structure as the Sandero, tested in 2021. Those cars are based on their ratings.

[@09RadBoy]

@@thevalidsimmer I know but for side impact it may be different. Also this being just a rebadged Kangoo, there is no need at all for it to have a different crash test.

[@composimple364]

@@09RadBoyyou didn’t get the logic, it’s not NCAP deciding which model to test on, it’s the car manufacturers deciding if they will send models for testing.

[@heidelbergerfan9686]

The Renault and Nissan are without Middleairbag and only four ⭐⭐⭐ ⭐

[@heidelbergerfan9686]

Mercedes is in all categories 15% better than the new Caddy! Both have the important Middle Airbag between the Front Passengers

[@emregr856]

same platform Renault and Nissan 4 stars, Mercedes 5 stars?

[@BarisDemirbilek]

Assistant systems?

[@emregr856]

@@BarisDemirbilek there are others too, he knows too much damn turkish

[@MaticTheProto]

Different software etc

[@hamzaeneskus3518]

Mercedes quality

[@masonholder69]

Higher quality vehicle, more safety equipment as standard.

[@Wasmachineman]

Isn't this a rebadged Kangoo like the Citan?

[@silcosilva]

no surprise since Mercedes-Benz has been collaborating with Renault and Nissan, with Citroen and Peugeot sharing platforms and engines as well...

[@MaticTheProto]

Not quite. Some systems are from Mercedes and the interior is better

[@MateiM.]

This little van it did better than BMW I4. I hat a good opinion on BMW also BMW I4 but now I'm disaapointed a lot. Renault and Mercedes did a good job.

[@ytuberization]

Open your eyes and don’t only believe the percentage numbers provided. The rigidity of the BMW chassis looks sensational, e.g. intrusions are minimal from any direction (pole test!), no windscreen broken etc. This is a rating exactly for the given speed. At higher speeds the BMW would be the safer car.

[@MaticTheProto]

@@ytuberization not quite, also it’s unsafe for pedestrians and has worse assistance systems

[@ThePawelekPawelek]

Side pole test looks poor.

[@laur6173]

Mercedes Copy Dacia Logan MCV

[@silcosilva]

it's a different body style and platform... more of the likes of Renault/Citroen/Peugeot Kangoo/Berlingo/Partner... Nissan and Fiat would also probably have a lookalike...

[@tcm_tatra]

🤣🤣🤣 Good joke. Mercedes has built before this kind of car , Vaneo in 2000s.

[@MaticTheProto]

When Mercedes haters don’t know anything

[@napim6752]

Won't sell much.

[@silcosilva]

not really, these would be popular with 'luxury' services like airport and/or hotel service or 'upmarket' cabs where most passengers would just judge by the badge...

[@MaticTheProto]

@@silcosilva also they want a nicer interior

[@tgb-vf4es]

T-class = Taxi class, there is no other better large fleet taxi than this at less than 20k before taxis with corporate discounts. Large, comfortable, the right badge.

[@adaytiempo]

Mercedes 69% and hyundai tucson 66% why? Are you paid by Mercedes? Hyundai performed 100% better in vulnerable road users test

[@eisberg1983]

No one cares

[@MaticTheProto]

Better assistance systems I‘d assume

[@alsove]

Its bad

[@iamblepg]

Bad for 5 Stars?

[@MaticTheProto]

Are you an asian parent? 😂