F117 being at 8.7 in ARB prooves we need new modes in ARB
@specc_s1452Ай бұрын
Did you use 100% of your brain for that one?
@55....Ай бұрын
@@specc_s1452 y mad
@specc_s1452Ай бұрын
@@55.... i'm not mad, just asking
@waba411529 күн бұрын
@@specc_s1452 asking why
@specc_s145229 күн бұрын
@@waba4115 because he doesn't explain ainything, just makes that statement
@MrBlueBurd0451Ай бұрын
For the record, a search radar WOULD have an easier time detecting an F-117 than the track radar. Track radars near universally have much shorter wavelengths, which is much more easily deflected and dispersed by the faceted shaping of the F-117.
@Trichobezoar_Ай бұрын
Gotta love there still being no NATO equivalent to the Kh-38MT, even with the patch being centered around top tier NATO CAS jets.
@tictaculerАй бұрын
So if they had bodged the brimstones to have a fnf mode it would have been able to get dam close to them
@linkist6599Ай бұрын
and germany doesnt even have a good top tier cas plane
@tictaculerАй бұрын
@@linkist6599 they won't have one till the eurofighter
@vurdel9799Ай бұрын
Japan doesn’t even have guided bombs
@linkist6599Ай бұрын
@@tictaculer they could add a better tornado for germany but hey eurofighter coming soon
@ComradeFuryАй бұрын
the Su-34 wasn't the first aircraft to have a PESA radar, the Super Etendard was since we have the SEM (Super Etendard Modernise) version in game has the Anemone PESA radar.
@user-gv4zb9rc6u29 күн бұрын
What does the F-14 have if not a PESA, same goes for the T-2 and F-1?
@NCSiebertdesign27 күн бұрын
@user-gv4zb9rc6u just extremely powerful radar in x band mode. PESA is just more advanced/ modern radar
@Hawkeye6941Ай бұрын
I don't know why the F15E didn't get the upgraded engine, like the Israel F15I version.
@FunFishFactsАй бұрын
Balance afaik , they didn't want f-15E to be better than f-15C in air , which is dumb imo because f-15I will be certainly better than baz meshupar and then it was that f-15E gets mavs while f-15I didn't but imo would much rather get 229's than mavs
@DeadSkyWTАй бұрын
Check the forums. I’ve made a poll on this.
@nercksruleАй бұрын
@@FunFishFacts Gotta give the players a reason to play the copycat tree.
@sevenshooter298729 күн бұрын
The f15c and F15E both use the same 220 engines, sometimes the f15E uses the 229.
@merf554929 күн бұрын
Because the US F15E with upgraded engines has a AESA radar
@gmtom19Ай бұрын
Of course when Britain gets a plane with a cool weapon system then Gaijin suddenly cares about balance and everything, even when its objectively worse than the other planes added in THE SAME UPDATE.
@Kozacc25 күн бұрын
literally, while listening to this i was like yeah of fucking course
@albedo826Ай бұрын
For the F-117 vs. Pantsir, for anyone who doesn't know how stealth works, search radars are able to detect stealth aircraft from still a decent distance away, they aren't invisible, so things like track while scan will still function at reduced ranges: it just makes it so that track radar's which need a very consistent and high PRF to track a target are unable to get a lock until very close, such as a track radar (this is because for the same reason you detect a launch warning when a friendly aircraft fires a missile from right beside you at an enemy aircraft far off over the horizon; radio waves, while very precise upon the band wave - the middle line - are quite thick, and radar receivers are quite delicate, and with combination of these two things even when the radio wave does not return back, to powerful radars such as the '1RS2' on the Pantsir, will track such a target from point blank, even though the radar is not directly feeding back to the system, the sheer girth of the radio wave at a distance on a search radar allows it to detect an aircraft, and as it gets closer and closer, the thickness of the middle line, the band, get's bigger and bigger as well -- eventually culminating in the track radar getting the strong high PRF it needs by proximity of the band to the receiver -- or point blank range). I do agree that SAM's are getting their track radars to lock too far out. So remember to keep your distance. Think of stealth as an implemented mechanic like the IRCM dazzler on the back of the Su-25T/UTG/TM - the Su-39), at distance no IR missile, IRCCM or not, will not track that target. From a close enough range, where the heat from the plume of the engines is the strongest and most clear, it brute forces its way past that defense. In this case, when a track radar gets close enough to the jet, it will by proximity of the radio wave, brute force its way into getting a return. Just remember not to open your bomb bay doors right over a SAM... P.S. No stealth aircraft is tested or built to be unlockable from point blank. For the sheer reason that the act of deflecting the radio wave means it has to hit something to be deflected by, and again, by proximity, it will get a lock. This is also where radar absorbent paint comes in, but again, this can only mitigate so much radiation from the wave. Photographs of the testing shows the distance between the F-117 and the radar they used to test it at short distance, but much like a STANAG armor test, they alter the strength and force of the test to adjust for range.
@wivysbrАй бұрын
I understand that it is correct that the Brimstone does not have the mode in which it ignores smoke etc... But why not transform it into a generic FnF missile, functioning like an AGM65? Now gaijin wants the vehicle to be realistic... interesting. Of course I'm going to keep the laser playing against a Pantsir, while playing as a Challenger I get a missile from an S25 where the kill cam doesn't even have the map rendered because it's so far away
@Vortex_inc.Ай бұрын
F-117 most useful in a br were there are no radars lmao
@tictaculerАй бұрын
So the thing with the brimstones being able to see through smoke most people dont even know kh38's are coming and dont smoke
@AMDeZaniАй бұрын
And thing is, they have nerfed missile's guidance systems before to make them fairer for the game. Like the Spikes which are also less capable of adjusting at longer ranges than they are in real life. Zero reason they couldn't do the same for the Brimstone and make it a generic FnF missile. But that'd be too fair.
@NotOlzenАй бұрын
I think most people can agree that LOAL wouldnt fit the game atm. But they could have just made them act like an IR TV guided missile similar to a 65D or something and it would be fine.
@tictaculerАй бұрын
@@NotOlzen yeah the lock on after launch is not the main problem as you would get 90% of the functionality with out the problem of sitting out of aa range
@rowanyuh632629 күн бұрын
The "170-1" product is the result of a deep upgrade of the previous generation R-77(RVV-AE) missile and was developed primarily to fit on the Su-35S fighter (see photo) and Su-34 bomber (see photo). Add R-77-1
@Potato-jd3wsАй бұрын
me when the Kh-38MTs are so fast that people don’t smoke and when they do the missiles are IOG so they kill anyways due to the explosive mass should’ve at minimum just made brimstones behave like mavericks so we could at least have something comparable to the Kh-38MTs because right now there’s both nothing comparable nor a surface-to-air counter to those missiles. yes shooting them down works, however there is now a vehicle that carries six of these missiles. all of which go Mach 2. Brimstones could’ve finally been something to use to counter the Russians, but of course Gaijin must keep them at the top
@NotOlzenАй бұрын
To be fair, the KH38ML are the dangerous ones. The MT wont lock beyond like 10-11km similar to a 65D, its just much faster and bigger like you said, but a smaller amount (untill we get SU34 ofc, but no thermals on that one).
@amrx78Ай бұрын
@@NotOlzen u can use the thermal of the kh38 :)
@NotOlzenАй бұрын
@@amrx78 You bring up a fair point, forget they have thermals too.
@Johnny_200Ай бұрын
"The new russian plane has blue afterburners which is cool" Me with a custom skin: Im two steps ahead
@DrClef_1Ай бұрын
Custom as one on marketplace or user one?
@SegFaultOnLine1984Ай бұрын
@@DrClef_1 many user skins have different color afterburner effects
@errornamenotfound2513Ай бұрын
The controversy on Brimstones is *NOT* about it being able to track through smoke as let's face it. You don't even actively defend yourself against IR/TV AGMs let alone Radar guided AGMs. Hell, when was the last time you actually actively defended yourself against incoming FnF AGMs by popping smoke? The Problem of FnF Brimstones is its capability to fire a salvo of it in a general direction and let the missiles themselves find their own targets which wisely gaijin chose to not add it. The problem is they just straight up just made it Laser guided and call it a day which just straight up removes the reason why Brimstones even existed (to be used against mass formations of armored targets) They could have at least just made be guided like an IR guided AGM but nope, straight to laser guided
@linkist6599Ай бұрын
@@errornamenotfound2513 even if it had its radar teamkills would be annoying af
@Libarate17Ай бұрын
Yep I dont see the issue with a fire and forget missile with a radar seeker. 99% of targets wont be hidden by smoke as they wouldnt know to deploy smoke. Same as with Mavericks or the Kh38s. Obviously the 'Lock After Launch' where the missile finds its own target would be OP as hell. But you can still have the missile with the Radar seeker behave just like Mavericks or Kh38s and it would be no more broken than those missiles.
@errornamenotfound251329 күн бұрын
@@linkist6599 Brimstones irl can distinguish friendlies from foes
@theblacksplit29 күн бұрын
@@errornamenotfound2513so can 120’s. we don’t see that happening tho do we?
@errornamenotfound251329 күн бұрын
@@theblacksplit dunno about 120s but gaijin can still certainly do it. They've already done it with aircraft radars/rwr where it can distinguish/filter out friendlies from foes no matter what aircraft it is +If Tking are still a problem despite only gaining my proposed typical guidance of IR guided AGMs (ie. Requiring visual to lock and fire) then that's on u not the missile
@krisxx973229 күн бұрын
Kh38t with 20km range + Tv seeker:yes balanced 🗣️ Brimstone 15km+ rader seeker: oh no need nerf🗣️🙏🏽❗
@nicolajnielsen1522Ай бұрын
"In 10 Minutes or Less" The video: 10:06
@KaguyasBeat29 күн бұрын
He did do it in less than 10 minutes. The outro brought it over, and I don't imagine that to be part of the new jet descriptions.
@Chounubis29 күн бұрын
It's a joke, u weebautist.
@rodneycook3674Ай бұрын
The stealth is going to be a gimmick. The directional indicator still pops up so they know you are there.
@Brzzzyexe22 күн бұрын
all of the tt spaas are also beam or saclos guided so as long as they can see you in the air which isn't too hard especially in the ranges that the f-117 needs to get for it to engage targets, but at 10.0 why wouldn't you just use cas that can just never get into spaas range at all. add to the fact at tt the ONLY spaa that can fight competent cas players is the pantsir every other spaa needs the pilot to fly closer than their maximum engagement range to even try to shoot them
@spray916Ай бұрын
The F-15I surprised me and if it stays as is, then I will be unlocking it first.
@firetruck125529 күн бұрын
The thing with the Tornado that’s confusing me are the bombs. Right now it has two guided options: EGBU-24 and Paveway IV. They use the American Mk84 and Mk82 respectively, yet on the plane you can see the visual model looks like a Mk13/18. That’s because it is, visually they’re using the model of the “Enhanced Mk.13” which is the Mk.13/18 we already have, but with added GPS guidance. The Tornado SHOULD have this as an option, yet it’s not - despite the fact both guided bomb options are using the visual model. Clearly that’s the placeholder whilst the models for the EGBU and Paveway IV are finished, but I would hope they’d add the Enhanced Mk.13 too since it really should be there already
@iboopy-fl2icАй бұрын
Its just illegal for britain to have anything nice isnt it :C
@sovietbanana4589Ай бұрын
I feel like locking the brimstones out of their individual acquire and kill mode is right for balancing. The 2 reasons are that they’d be really really strong, and that the amount of friendly fire would be crazy. Brimstones during the gulf war weren’t allowed to use the mode for that exact reason. A missile that independently acquires a target without iff while dumb launching would fuck up a lot of stuff. The issue is that without the radar mode all the thing has is its semi active laser mode. Which is what’s been implemented. Maybe gaijin could jury rig something to make them work like active laser where they go self guiding after initial laser designation. But other than that they’re stuck where they are.
@Starkogi28 күн бұрын
They did the Su-39 ECM system fine, but you can lock an approaching F-117 at 10+km lol
@jusezaba855729 күн бұрын
I'm waiting for someone to complain when they discover at the merge that the F-15E (maybe the I too) is kind of a boat because of the heavier weight and the focus on a more multirole/ground capability
@RogueBeatsARGАй бұрын
Bro 5 kilometers with a SPAA is nice stealth, do people really thinkg Stealth fighters are 100% undetectable?
@Ghent_HalcyonАй бұрын
It’s good, much better than normal, especially considering this is literally the first one, but it isn’t useful. This thing is not particularly fast and only has two drops. Drops which might not work because, mysteriously, you happen to get gajined much more when fighting Russia , aka, the main thing you fight when playing US.
@Brzzzyexe22 күн бұрын
considering out of the over 1300 attacks it over 2 decades only 1 was ever shot down and the only reason was because the bay door was open i'd say it should be pretty damn near undetectable + rcs lower than the f-35
@RogueBeatsARG22 күн бұрын
@@Brzzzyexe the bay door open was not the only reason it was shoot down.. dont take Lazerpig as a real historical source
@Ghent_Halcyon21 күн бұрын
@@RogueBeatsARG On top of the fact that they knew it was going to be there, yeah, it is the only reason it actually got shot down.
@GamerFromSpaceАй бұрын
Ngl f117 seems like a chill plane to play in sim battles
@301_tyron5Ай бұрын
2:39 f-117 won’t be facing pantirs!!!
@microbomber57527 күн бұрын
Now i have a reason to keep researching the uk tech tree
@JSDFEnthusiast19 күн бұрын
In game stealth is worst from the rear according to the files, and decently nerfed overall for some reason. Stealth is worst side on irl because that's the biggest picture. *Big brain*
@BOBTHEBALL216929 күн бұрын
Thanks Unc, nice video
@Ghent_HalcyonАй бұрын
Bro, the F-117’s be for ground is 10.0. It will face panstirs and osas. As well as literally everything.
@MD-wn4uiАй бұрын
They just need to add the 114L and Brimstones and remove the ability to see smoke. Just say the chaff is in the smoke.
@RedTail1-1Ай бұрын
Sucks that only 2 nations get new aircraft. Maybe if they didn't give 3 Tornados to everyone else they could have gotten one this update to coincide with the Strike Fighter theme
@phantom_ii4594Ай бұрын
AV-8S in the files 🗣🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@DylanAlexander-nv1ez29 күн бұрын
Get 4 of these in a squad in sim battle to go obliterate Roland’s at the air field then have bombers come in behind to kill the airfield. Boom blue wins every game.
@normallymute013127 күн бұрын
Gaijin implementing stealth so goddamn wrong, the F-117 has the smallest RCS in a front aspect attack. Ironically gets detected consistently at 10km by all radar. Side aspect where the RCS is considerably larger is treated like regular notching where air radars can’t pick them up until .5km and 5km. Backwards as usual. And the F-15E having weaker engines for no goddamn reason. They sure do love to preemptively nerf nato shot
@BabaGrill69-cb8zn16 күн бұрын
*F-117 and F15E baby!*
@Bennys-handle7 күн бұрын
my ssd is soo slow it couldent even finish patching by the time this video was done
@CtRAlTtAbАй бұрын
i feel like the F-117A's stealth would only be useful at higher BRs in sim
@Янус_ЫртАй бұрын
It is pretty useful against stuff like 2S6 in GRB
@SirCabooseCCCPАй бұрын
@@Янус_Ырт 2S6 has IRST and it will see it by the time its in bomb range tho
@SirCabooseCCCPАй бұрын
6 mavericks 8 paveways and 4 glide bombs on an F-15 yet Russian CAS is op cuz they have a jet with 4 missiles that can maybe hit something 15km+
@BlackjackTheLad28 күн бұрын
Words can't express how infuriated I am that the snail is gimping the Mudhen for the silliest reasons.
@arcticiceberg9945Ай бұрын
Lee you need to fix the tornado not being in the thumbnail
@mab218729 күн бұрын
Super Eten was the 1st with PESA, Su-34 is the 2nd yetis the more well known one. Btw i see the old style of rp and sl prompt in the battles when you get a kill, how is that working? mod? which one?
@TheInvisibleOrange26Ай бұрын
What’s the expected release date?
@Chounubis29 күн бұрын
So, MiG-15's will fly side by side with an 80's stealth plane? Wtf, Gaijan. But guess I shouldn't be shocked after all the Cold War/post-Cold War hardware facing early-mid WW2 stuff.
@Starkogi28 күн бұрын
Honestly, considering the history and location the F-117 was flying, running into a MiG-15 was a very real possibility. Unlikely, but possible.
@skipslash7367Ай бұрын
power creep is creeping
@theKEY.-Ай бұрын
Super Etendard should also have a PESA; GJ just didnt modeld it
@Joey_LiuАй бұрын
Afro Vulcan When?
@rodneycook3674Ай бұрын
The Israel f15 looks really promising for air rb
@logicmaster756Ай бұрын
Plane goofy Technically a full downtier to 7.7
@an_unknown_user029 күн бұрын
When is this update supposed to drop? Any ideas?
@warthunderplayer1753Ай бұрын
The f15e devblog said it will get AIM120B
@mathewtheis913929 күн бұрын
Even if you were going to take away the radar tracking for the brimstones they should’ve given an IR. Taking away one real world mechanic, and not adding another in its place is ridiculous. Those missiles are useless slow and you can only fire one at a time you’re better off just using the PGM’s in which case you might as well just stick with the GR3. Does another example of clear anti-British sentiment by Gaijin. Even with the active radar homing, it would’ve just forced people to move into cover areas which Gaijin is doing anyway with all the city maps.
@suzybean13Ай бұрын
Wassup lee? I love how the f117 isn’t that good at its only good feature 😌
@randomowykolegazinternetuАй бұрын
Polish-Czech-Slovak-Ukrainian tech tree when
@pyrolooga3393Ай бұрын
When you shut up about it
@devendoffing7004Ай бұрын
@@pyrolooga3393you just like being rude to people for no reason?
@Elturbo157Ай бұрын
Never!
@randomowykolegazinternetuАй бұрын
@@Elturbo157 You NEVER had parents who loved you.
@Elturbo157Ай бұрын
@@randomowykolegazinternetu I will NEVER agree with that
@The-ThunderTigerАй бұрын
Romania mentioned !!! MIG-21 Lancer
@katgutАй бұрын
At 10.0 there are no good cas options for usa, if you want to go up there are but the a7s are terrible to grind and you should probably take anything else
@Pookie539Ай бұрын
A10 f4c
@Elbereth_TVАй бұрын
they added RCS mod of 0.5 to the rear for some reason on the f117 xD
@DarkLighting115Ай бұрын
F-117 should be even 8.3 at ARB an 10.0 in GRB
@sgtj.peldridge456729 күн бұрын
Israeli F-15I getting the upgraded engines and American jet not getting them is crazy even though america put the 229 engines in the F-15E 6 years before we sold it to Israel
@TazziedoesWT29 күн бұрын
Ah yes, balance my tornado and give it a missile that has the same capability as a missile from a 10.3 Su-25. I mean cmon, yes I understand the brimstone irl is very very very powerful, but to neuter them so much they are no longer fire and forget is ridiculous!
@PotatoBreadYumАй бұрын
so basically if israel gets the f15 to stay at the overperforming speed then theres almost no point in me grinding japan
@ethansnowden62020 күн бұрын
When does it come out
@Elbereth_TVАй бұрын
and sweden gets left out again, there's so much they can add xD
@honeybadgerbomb4469Ай бұрын
France not getting anything, despite being a bigger arms dealer than Sweden, Germany, and Israel combined
@Fueled_up_CPM26 күн бұрын
When is it coming
@amrx78Ай бұрын
it was gonna be a good update if they added agm130 and the brimstone as irl but no gaijn decided to Russia bias yet again
@honeybadgerbomb4469Ай бұрын
where'd the Mirage RMV go
@Anthony1102www28 күн бұрын
Germany CAS jet : Dieing under the sea
@robinsonsstudios28 күн бұрын
still no new WWII aircraft, what a letdown
@LalasfritasАй бұрын
Why does the US f15e have the same engines as the f15c? Isnt it supposed to have F-110's (same engine as f16c and f14b)?
@Janno32_Ай бұрын
Only the later models have it, and the F-15I is a later model.
@LalasfritasАй бұрын
@@Janno32_ oh I see thanks for clarifying
@jaek__Ай бұрын
@@Janno32_the one we have essentially is the later model considering its ordinance and hms but whatever
@Hunterminez29 күн бұрын
I called the F117 in the Q&A Video 😎 (Also this is more than 10 min long I want a refund)
@DarkLighting115Ай бұрын
Su-34 or get better fm and hmd or be 13.3
@inoo2345Ай бұрын
Once again my beloved mig29 doesnt get a flight model change. And for anyone saying gaijin thinks its already accurate, where are the f16 nerfs, cause you telling me the f16 being better in every type of dogfight is accurate?
@xcauseyes639127 күн бұрын
sooo sweden is getting nothing again
@Loobernoob29 күн бұрын
The F-117 is probably the most useless aircraft added to the game
@merf554929 күн бұрын
Germany still got nothing, im going to kms
@SegFaultOnLine1984Ай бұрын
Nothing for german top tier again. This must be a joke.
@jjwardyjjАй бұрын
Cries in brits. Another useless tornado
@derpypotatos4610Ай бұрын
What of they remove the amraams, the JDAMs, and the glide bombs form the US Strike Eagle and put it at 13.0 instead. Make it an early version serving at the end of the Cold War.
@FunFishFactsАй бұрын
So it would just be a heavy f-15A with some more ground ordinance? No thanks
@sxshi9984Ай бұрын
I can’t play it as a fighter 😭
@rowanyuh632629 күн бұрын
Cas spam is somehow getting worse 😪
@kyde992129 күн бұрын
F117 DOA
@bagelmaster249829 күн бұрын
funny how none of these are german
@swagbelly7740Ай бұрын
I doubt f15e with its absurd speed and power retention will be worse than f15c at same br
@СергейНикольский-я2цАй бұрын
Same PW-220 engines + 1.5 tons heavier airframe, how it is not going to be worse lmao?
@swagbelly7740Ай бұрын
@@СергейНикольский-я2ц maybe because each engine is 2k more thrust? Did u actually test it or say it just after hearing this guy? Go to dev and test it out, its insane what u can do in that thing
@Bayonet_SilverАй бұрын
only the f15i has improved engines
@NotOlzenАй бұрын
@@swagbelly7740 you say F15E (which dont get the better engines, thats the F15I Ra'am). So the F15E that is heavier will ofc be worse then the F15C when they have the same engines.
@mokasoАй бұрын
I hope Gaijin caves to the pressure and gives the F-15E the 229 engines. It would be a more than capable A2A platform too if given the 120C-5s it has. But the nerf to NATO vehicles this update is just weird. RIP British mains and their half baked Brimstones.
@skipslash7367Ай бұрын
fuck you if you think that adding fire and forget missiles that can go through smoke is at all a good idea
@linkist6599Ай бұрын
@@mokaso if the f15e gets aim 120c-5s it has no competition whatsoever being easily the best plane
@DeadSkyWTАй бұрын
Check the forums. I’ve made a poll there.
@Re.tr-02Ай бұрын
Yuhhhh
@mateuszgame159729 күн бұрын
F117 is gonna be so shit 😭😭😭
@maggi98mwАй бұрын
The F-117 is so fugly
@jaek__Ай бұрын
me when i’m blind
@SirCabooseCCCPАй бұрын
@@jaek__ its a flying cheese block guh
@alvarovillatoro5187Ай бұрын
GIVE ISRAEL MAVERICKS GOD DAMN IT!
@Janno32_Ай бұрын
They will likely get their own stuff. A bug report has already been filed for that.