Every Political Ideology Explained in 8 Minutes

[@CCharles0519]

No sponsors, no intros, just straight to the point, simple and quick. If only more videos were like this.

[@Epic_R3K47]

Agree

[@java4653]

The first post thinks Conservatism is it's own thing and that "Conserve" is its basis. This person understands nothing . It has fascism as an single ideology when it's a tool for gaining power in a democracy, with the actual beliefs of 20th C. fascists varying from country to country.

[@MrGamelover23]

Unfortunately, you can't make a job out of this without sponsors.

[@TheMadWhit666]

Lol then how else are they going to make money??

[@dntakemesrs]

Give them time and these videos will have all of that.

[@sootythunder3111]

You know it’s extremly refreshing to see someone point out the difference between capitalism, corporatism, and corpratacracy

[@thetalantonx]

Right? That alone was worth me just liking and subscribing rather than picking on the smaller bits I disagreed with (due to my experience in and dealing with them giving me a more granular view.)

[@ThePaintExplainer]

Thanks, glad you enjoyed it!

[@andrewrobb3258]

Gess the corporatism/corportocricy misunderstanding is to the right as the socialism/communism misunderstanding is to the left. Realy wish people would look up details on these things as they do matter.

[@ghostmantagshome-er6pb]

A communist is just a socialist in a hurry.

[@cazzac4817]

@@andrewrobb3258 croporatocracy is just liberal corporatism whereby private individuals are free to join and leave and create corporations at their own whim.

[@nguyenminhle8694]

Wow, this is the calmest comment section I've ever come across under a video that talks about...politics

[@HerrscherPuppet]

Yeah. It’s almost uncanny

[@HDGAMERZ-ib3bs]

Do your own research, half the video is not factual. The only ones he gets right are all the right winger ones for some reason.

[@AmericanPendetta]

YouRube’s censorship is ALWAYS bad

[@JollyWally12349]

Don't jinx it.

[@jonathanjohnjohnson]

Here, I'll start the argument. I THINK: It's pronounced gif, not gif

[@someguynamedluden1090]

This comment section is either gonna be really chill or really chaotic

[@Super--Paper--Fox]

or both. AKA freedom of speech

[@justsomeeggsinapot1784]

This is what freedom is, yes. A gorgeous dance of orderly chaos

[@fdracnc]

fr

[@stringfellowhawk1063]

@@justsomeeggsinapot1784great analogy

[@justsomeeggsinapot1784]

Im trippin with that goofy ass comment

[@crimzonpegasus9714]

I've always hated these labels being thrown around so casually and carelessly. You can share values from multiple political ideologies, and not agree with some others in the same ideology. Yet you get shunned because they see you as group A, when you can share values with group A, B, and C

[@BlackStar_734]

This is so true. It's so sad that people expel others from their lives over minor differences in thought.

[@jaromino77]

Nobody can ever really entirely fit into one ideology without contradicting themselves. People have to do a better job acknowledging that other people and themselves are diverse in judgements and beliefs

[@manictiger]

I have an ideology called realism. It's where I look at humanity, and realize that the vast majority of them are so insanely mentally deficient, that I can't talk to them about politics.

[@carson3140]

Very true, I share values with both feminism and nazism for example.

[@wetter4293]

THIS IS HOW THEY DIVIDE US. It's the reason the left and right has such extreme values. It's also the reason we can't seem to agree on seemingly simple yet basic and society driving facts...

[@DLiver]

It's interesting to see how each ideology is practiced differently by the people of the modern world than what the actual ideology stands for.

[@WhatIMakeIsRandom]

I thought the same!

[@emmakaisa27]

I actually don't think so

[@Aexitprod]

which one?

[@Lowseeds]

@@Aexitprod I mean take femnism for example, t means equal rights, but some people have warped its meaning quite alot

[@c43pmurderson25]

Like socialism. The description in this video presents the theory, which appears pretty good for the worker. However, if one takes into account the history of socialism and its current practice in many places around the world, then one sees that the theory and practice are quite disparate.

[@Vtopos]

Glad you distinguished the difference between corporatism and corporatocracy.

[@ThePaintExplainer]

Yeah, they tend to get confused a lot

[@zyyl1949]

Corporatism is very rare in the modern world, China is the only one that comes to mind when thinking of a country/state leaning towards it

[@ManiacMayhem7256]

​@@zyyl1949 Singapore

[@MrArthys]

​@@zyyl1949is South Korea an example of corporatism or corporatocracy?

[@zeroworldcraft]

There is no difference. Just time... This thought I have just said is a huge deal. Anarchy + time = dictatorship. Dictatorship + time = monarchy.

[@Zaltic]

I think we can all agree that almost all of these ideologies' followers never actually do what they're defined, rather just hold the titles

[@dominikrni]

Except nazism

[@Zaltic]

@@dominikrni fair point 😂

[@duncanchillake8024]

I guess we're all moderatists

[@JaneDoe-pp8se]

yeah

[@iyoyoyoyoyoyoyo]

Perhaps most don't actually know what the ideology they're holding actually means and just follow what others have said

[@black.sasuke.uchiha]

I really like that the narrator jumped straight into it, no intro, and defined everything concisely and quickly, a lot of these terms are used in an interchangeable manner. I subscribed, you’re currently at 39K but I know you’ll reach 40K soon!

[@kingoverflow]

Sasuke 🤡

[@Rock2765-gw1qc]

He has now

[@guylikesbananas3986]

yes

[@SkyForgeGears]

@@kingoverflow 🤡"kingoverflow"

[@Felivii]

Road to 100k!

[@mr.monitor1305]

Thank you for explaining the difference between libertarianism and liberalism. I see too many people today thinking they are one in the same.

[@MicahMicahel]

leftists? They don't understand what liberalism means. Trudeau or anyone that pushed mandates our censorship is not liberal or libertarianism. Woke people are never libertarians because wokeness is literally social fasciism.

[@cnjor2331]

Same

[@tsevra2437]

This is because the only ones who misuse these terms are the Americans. Everybody out the US calls liberals those who approve Ricardo's, Hayek's, Von Mises', etc. ideals, while libertarianism is usually used for anarchosocialist movements.

[@ptrknvk]

Tbh, classical liberalism (f.e. Austrian economical school) is very close to libertarianism.

[@tsevra2437]

@@ptrknvk It is not, in no way. That's some Ayn Rand type of argument. Although they pretend their "revolutionary" economical system is disguised through the lens of the sole consumer, and not through the demand-offer curve, their final conclusion is driven through an abstraction of the rudest laissez-faire law of nature, which is not ultimately very libertarian. One has to think that libertarianism is arguably built over the pilars of social interaction, not the cult to the individual.

[@gahbunga]

Glad you mentioned Communism not having a state. The amount of people that think Communism is "The state controls everything" is mind-boggling.

[@alphacharlie3856]

Not in theory but in Principal there is always going to be some form of state.

[@brian.phillips1985]

Blame Lenin for that

[@isg4]

​@@rimmelscheiter6943 libertarianism is about the limitation of the state, not the abolition of it

[@isg4]

@@rimmelscheiter6943 minarchist?????

[@owenn0437]

@@rimmelscheiter6943 you are only given exactly what you need. no more no less

[@chernobylthing3932]

For a video explaining politics, this was refreshingly apolitical and unbiased.

[@pumpupsongs5500]

No it wasn’t their was an obvious bias if you cant tell the bias your biased

[@KarlSnarks]

@@pumpupsongs5500 Well enlighten us..

[@iaminsideyourwalls2021]

​@@pumpupsongs5500I can't take someone who can't use correct grammar and punctuation seriously

[@famisheddendon]

It was very immediately biased

[@purplerVAL]

@@famisheddendon please show where

[@MaitlandJones]

Brilliantly done, I thought this would just be a meme video, but I was quickly pleasantly surprised when you defined conservatism and liberalism by their classical definitions. I was impressed even further when you didn't simply conflate authoritarianism, fascism, and National Socialism with each other. All while being completely neutral with each one! Well done!

[@ThePaintExplainer]

Thank you so much!

[@skillfullshank1300]

I'm not sure how neural he was with nazism, seeing as how the music kind of built up and such, however that doesnt really matter nazism isn't really an ideology that is defendable. Other than that I'd say he represented every ideology completely fairly.

[@ronanbreen1141]

​@@ThePaintExplaineryour video is good and unbiased. Would have liked to have seen social democracy some where tho

[@Etrius10]

Still grossly biased in a disingenuous fashion, typical redditor political leanings. Nothing new here.

[@Quin_BNK]

​@@ronanbreen1141It'd fit in Comunitarianism I believe

[@bigmyke2008]

It’s refreshing to hear political ideologies being explained without smug rhetoric and banter. I look forward to more content

[@EliW95]

except 'libertarianism;' is not an 'ideology' any more than arithmetic saying 2+2=4 is an 'ideology' it's a simple bleeding obvious principle that should be so universally recognized that no one should have to call themselves a 'libertarian' any more than anyone has to call themselves a slavery abolitionist

[@dirtydeeds4free553]

​@EliW95 what? You do understand the idea of different people believing in different things right?

[@EliW95]

@@dirtydeeds4free553 yes i do, but there is *no legitimacy* in believing that others should be subjugated to your personal values and preferences. I shouldn't get to force you to conform to the doctrines of Islam if you believe in some sect of Christianity, likewise you shouldn't be able to force me to conform to whatever religion or religious sect you believe in if I don't want to, as just one example. Libertarianism actually allows a *broad spectrum* of belief systems and philosophies as long as they essentially adhere to the non-aggression principle what could be more simple and reasonable than that?

[@theoutergod8666]

​@@EliW95 So tell me. -If I am powerful, and you are weak, why should I let you be alone? -You obviously envy me, so you ARE plotting something against me. You want my wealth. I need to get rid of you. -You live in a mudshack, I live in a palace, you are obviously miserable. You don't see the truth, so you protest, but I will make you see the light I bring. -Why should I let you be, if you are not a human at all?

[@EliW95]

@@theoutergod8666 you're making blanket assumptions. I'm actually *against* the employer employee relationship dynamic because i basically see it as a form of de-facto indentured servitude due to the nature of the power dynamic, and i actually tend to put more of an emphasis on the *personal relations* aspect of the market (basically the aspects that are in line with mutualist philosophy) rather than an emphasis on capital investment and accumulation, which would *necessarily* mean narrowing (but not eliminating because that would be *realistically impossible* ) the wealth inequality and therefore power imbalance of society but thanks for the blanket assumptions jack@ss

[@VisualVoyages08]

Kudos for shedding light on the nuances between capitalism, corporatism, and corporatocracy. It's rare to see someone tackle these distinctions. Your clarity is a breath of fresh air in the content space. Looking forward to more insightful breakdowns!

[@Dynamic-cy8wn]

I just follow one thing, Christianity. Dont need no nonesense.

[@sulkissulking]

​@@Dynamic-cy8wn True irony right there.

[@Dynamic-cy8wn]

@@sulkissulking Why are you so angry all the time?

[@TheDarkLordsoflight]

@@Dynamic-cy8wnbc he gets beat at home by his stepdad

[@FineWine-v4.0]

Regardless it's a failed system

[@Alpha_Foxtrot-28]

Schrodingerism: a political stance which depends on whom an individual is trying to troll on the internet that day.

[@mathinho1237]

To filiate you need to don't have a life

[@alejandrorivera6122]

I strongly subscribe to this ideology.

[@adarshshankarrai9912]

supporter of this ideology

[@WRSpiral]

The greatest most successful ideology of them all.

[@asinglemaleinuk]

Is the cat dead, or alive

[@colinjohnston9824]

Unfortunately many people believe they are supporting a specific ideology, but the ideology is in name only. The liberal party of Canada, for example, is liberal in name, but in practice has been reducing privacy rights, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, worker rights, and human rights in an authoritarian manner.

[@LordKimani]

Truth, I live in Toronto and could tell you this myself

[@abefernandez6546]

Alot people claim they are liberal but believe in the opposite of those belief. Some of them are totally fine with authoritarianism.

[@SpecialistScorch]

That’s interesting, they’re trying to do the exact same thing in the US

[@ManaPirate]

We have the Liberal-National Coalition in Australia, and they are very conservative in their views, mostly serving the highest earners and appeasing their strongest voting force at the detriment to progress. (I have some heavy bias here of course). Names really don't mean anything which is unfortunate since it can be quite misleading. We also have a minor party called "The Informed Medical Options Party" which the overview is that they want to ensure the health of the nation which sounds great, but in reality they're just anti-vaxxers trying to impose dangerous ideologies. I just wish there was some sort of regulation ensuring people knew what they were voting for at face value

[@seanhartnett79]

I mean conservative parties have moved towards fascism.

[@TransparentEclipse]

Political ideologies are such a divisive topic, glad to see them explained in a simple and easy to understand way so that people can make up their own minds instead of just listening to whoever is close to them in their lives and parroting the information.

[@NazriB]

Lies again? LA Liga Good Papi

[@MrSirFluffy]

Kind of. The issue is the video did a fine job at describing the traditional definitions, however, if you are an American for instance these terms mean something very different. For instance modern Conservatism in the US is Liberalism in this video. Liberals in the US are actually leftist that don't support Liberal values, they only use the name.

[@jhanson313]

i hope you dont make ur decision on who to vote for based on this video LOL

[@MauGouveiaa]

Being simple and precise doesn't mean being correct. By watching the vídeo, it looks like ideologies are options which you choose. No, ideologies choose you, they build the basic fundations for your thoughts. And the ideologies on the vídeo aren't on the same level: Everyone is a liberal at some level, capitalism is a economic sistem, not a single person ever defines itself as a populist because it's just a label (just like ''terrorist''). The first use of the word ''ideology'' was by french ideologist post french revolution. They tried to create a universal theory about ideas, where you can analize politics objectively without taking sides. Being ideological means, by the original definition, doing exactly what this vídeo is doing.

[@BeerMetal58]

@@MrSirFluffy You are out of your mind. Modern Conservatism in the US is right-wing near-fascism everywhere else in the world. "Liberals" in the US would be considered actual conservatives just about everywhere else that isn't a dictatorship.

[@lilbirb082]

For all of the uneducated people getting mad in the comments over the liberalism section here is an explanation, in north America what we call "liberalism" has basically nothing to do with the actual historical definition of liberalism. In North America the term liberalism really just means social democracy with a strong emphasis on progressivism, an American "liberal" would support high taxation, welfare, limited gun ownership, and suppression of "hate" speech amongst other things, but actual liberalism is basically the complete opposite of that, classical liberals are against unnecessary taxation, support strong gun and property rights, absolute free speech, and limited government in general. "Hey that kind of sounds like conservatism" While classical liberalism does share a lot of ideas with what north Americans call "conservatism" it is still a completely separate ideology, classical liberals support the autonomy of the body as they see it as the first line of private property so they fully support the right to abortion, classical liberals support absolute free speech unlike conservatives or progressives who only support free speech when it's inline with their beliefs, classical liberals support a very secular government, support lazies-fare capitalism (which basically just means capitalism with almost 0 governmental regulation), and as said before in favor of a small government in general, unlike conservatives who do support small government intervention in the economy, but are in favor of government interference in the personal lives of citizens, like banning abortion, or certain media that they find "immoral"

[@stefantom4]

Very informative

[@dannylojkovic5205]

This. What we call “libertarianism” in America, is just liberalism in the rest of the world

[@alexandernaydenov7539]

​@@dannylojkovic5205true

[@BrendenNichols]

This ideology is what I’d say most accurately describes me.

[@RE.MadStag]

This doesn’t make sense at all. Because as a liberal, what conservatives make fun of me for here in the U.S, everything in the video related exactly to me. The conservative part seemed to be exactly the Conservatives. I think you just felt guilty from this video. It’s called denial. Maybe you are a liberal and you haven’t done enough research just yet.

[@monty6851]

Transhumanism in a nutshell: "From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel" Edit: thanks to contributions in the comments, we can also include Witchers and X-Men in nutshell transhumanism. Praise the Omnisiah for the sharing of information on the internet

[@5erase]

If I ever have to get prosthetics I will dedicate my life to Transhumanism

[@benyseus6325]

Trahnshumansim can also evolve into genetic augmentation and biological supplementation - it doesn’t necessarily have to directly correlate to synthetic implants and cyborg bodies

[@nadaningunos9339]

'Wake up samurai'

[@cthulhufhtagn7520]

​@@benyseus6325That still counts as technology, but yes I agree that his description of it was rather lacking. The "ultimate goal" in transhumanism is morphological freedom and being able to control whatever aspects of the human condition that you wish, not all transhumanists want immortality, god-like intellect or an indestructible powerful body

[@monty6851]

@@5erase you're not wrong, and now we can include Witchers and X-Men as nutshell transhumanism

[@twmarmy0226]

I expected 8 minutes of pure banter and trolling, but received 8 mins of actually educational political education. My disappointment is immeasureable and my day is ruined

[@Revenant-oq9ts]

The more I watched this, the more I realized how little people know about their own self professed ideology, let alone that of others.

[@pyrovania]

It is useful because people throw these words around without knowing what they mean.

[@ruinhem]

Yes. Learn to navigate this rotten mess and be a part of the mob. Not to speak ill of the video but it is all utterly meaningless.

[@Kephy_]

@@Sinivaal Corporations always rule in a free market.

[@rompevuevitos222]

@@Kephy_Also free markets are infamous for crashing and burning, then making the common folk pay the broken dishes.

[@StormLord-AOS]

your coverage of anarchism was very well put together, which is rare in a lot of videos on the topic. well done

[@Michigander_of_the_West]

Ironically

[@ghostlegend434]

It’s ai

[@deinsilverdrac8695]

it was very simplified tho. There's technically a state, it's just not differenciated from the people. The state simply have no power. There's people who mannage the society, they just have no power over anyone else, so they can't abuse it. what's worse is that people will mistake anarchy with anarchism, a thing media and politics have pretty much forced to fught against this political ideology. That and just dropping bomb on the anarchism village and societies.

[@Bunny_Bill]

@@ghostlegend434 don't care. I get to learn. I'd be a lot more upset if the creator pulled a kwebbelkop

[@luis-sophus-8227]

Anarchism: No rules lol

[@Danny_Blackk]

Mine is autism Edit: for all those saying this was offensive I'm diagnosed autistic and have been for several years

[@WhatDillionYT]

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

[@anbubu]

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

[@theduckconstructs7686]

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

[@cheesehoncho4685]

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

[@Cdontdoit]

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

[@saltyiceteamaker6140]

This video was incredibly informative for being only 8 minutes. I'd like to see some of those ideology explained more in depth

[@stupedcraig]

Yeah, this is awesome. I didn't realize Transhumanism was an option. We shall overcome our weak puny bodys with the power of robotics!

[@Nykandros]

He should so off-compass ideologies next. Avaritionism, Kraterocracy, etc.

[@TheRezro]

Unfortunately many of mentioned ideologies are marginal or theoretical. It does not explain core division in the politics.

[@ThePaintExplainer]

Might make a more in-depth one with basically all of the existing ideologies, but it'll be like 2 hours long.

[@umfreakingmad5386]

​@@ThePaintExplainerPlease do!

[@cosmosxk9695]

I liked it. The presentation seemed neutral and focused on describing the ideologies, including their perspectives. I learned more about some ideologies I knew some things about, and even some that I didn't know anything about, like Corporatism, Communitarianism and Moderatism. Thank you for making a video that is both informative and descriptive.

[@ThePaintExplainer]

Glad you liked it!

[@juni5822]

​@blackpanther5086you responded to a comment praising their work on the video with a Hitler quote and a salute emote? Never mind the Nazi roach that you are part, you also can't even read. That's a double whammy

[@thomasdehaan00]

​@blackpanther5086how can you advocate for a guy who committed genocide?

[@Birri919]

@@thomasdehaan00 He probably thinks he's one of the ubermensch even though we all know most neo-nazis would be sent straight to the camps

[@john1802]

​@@Birri919how does it makes any argument? What if he is actually pure aryan? And most importantly nazis weren't putting everyone non aryan in camps, try learning history

[@pistolero22]

this is a great explanation of all the political ideologies, thank you for teaching me more about politics

[@CabaHarald]

It is a great explanation of the ideologies he talks about however it is no where near all of them and would take a very very long time to explain every single one there is a video about every single ideology though and it is about 3 hours long

[@kataclysmad1065]

As i came across, I was genuinely pleased by the tone and the synthesis of the video. Coming from France, politics is number one topic everywhere, but it seems we lost the idea where debating for a better system turned to an endless fight between parties instead of realising most of us have the same goals. It is a well done video with usefull hindsight. Eager to see more of your content.

[@cesruhf2605]

yeah as a french we definitely need to be taught to be able to listen even though we think we might disagree, and have more civilised discussions rather than constantly shouting at each other

[@21minus1]

all people have different goals

[@jpraise6771]

His Majesty Jesus Christ has sent me on a mission with a message to tell the masses! Fear not, my brothers, your hunger shall be no more. He who dispenses the bread of life shall be your sustenance!

[@ashryil]

@@21minus1 no

[@moemuxhagi]

'Faut aussi que les gens comprênent que la politique française n'est PAS la politique américaine : on a plus de deux partis, et les deux principaux sont pas "gauche libérale et extrême droite conservatrice", c'est "gauche populiste et droite moderationniste" 😮‍💨 trop de jeunes passent trop de temps sur internet, et à cause de l'influence des US, ils sont convaincus que LEUR politique est LA politique. Non. Faut juste ouvrir un peu les yeux et voir la différence d'idéaux

[@Maxel53]

I appreciate the objectivity and non biased values when explaining these topics. It really helps understand their general forms for what they are rather to how they function. A testament to how good this video is is how the comment section is very relaxed despite the topic in question being very pollarizing. Thanks a lot!

[@random6033]

no one is unbiased

[@andreitobosaru6847]

@@random6033yes, of course, but that doesn't mean he didn't speak in an unbiased/objective tone. He did not use words or images that suggested one of the views is better or worse, except maybe for nazism(but even in it's case, he just stated the facts)

[@Profeshinal]

@@andreitobosaru6847 When it comes to the Nazism section of this video, he just told it how it was. People who actually are Nazi's, wouldn't see it as bad because that's truly what they believe in. He didn't demonize them, since they already do it to themselves.

[@tko8218]

3x's more information on the LEFT: Conservatism = 10 seconds /// Liberalism = 31 seconds

[@elitetripod4188]

He was biased in his video. He focused almost exclusively on pointing out the authoritarian nature of ideologies like fascism yet didn't mention it at all when talking about the socialist ideologies. This is called lying by omission and is a deliberate tactic.

[@imagination_nub]

Something I love about this video is that he made almost all of them sound good. From watching that video, I couldn't say where this guy stands politically. Only a few things to say where he doesn't. It's refreshing to have a video about politics that's purely objective and doesn't bring any of the personal beliefs of the creator into it

[@TheUnderscore_]

It's definitely not "purely objective," because as you said there are "a few things to say" what he doesn't agree with. Thankfully we can say those things are agreed upon for most of us as well lmfao, but still not "purely objective."

[@LukeTheGreat1]

Hes literally biased towards leftardism. Its clear as day.

[@mite3959]

@@TheUnderscore_ Only really fascism and nazism from what i can tell

[@colincrosgrove9132]

I don't think it's completely subjective. He talks bad about one bad ideology but then tries to sound neutral or not bad about another pretty horrific one.

[@bigouncebounce]

​@@colincrosgrove9132?

[@devendrapandey3761]

This is the best channel ive ever found Thanks algorithm god

[@drandren9093]

This is a little bit insignificant but the fact you actually explain fascism properly or at least a lot better than other people is huge props to you. Most people will just use it interchangeably with Nazism, or just twist the reality of it which takes away from the actual things that make it a horrible ideology.

[@whyisyes3957]

@blackpanther5086It’s pretty right, it lines up with the beliefs of the Nazi Party

[@cheekguardian1378]

​@blackpanther5086how exactly?

[@ahandlemustbechosen]

@blackpanther5086 How?

[@hyperboreanmustache]

He doesn’t know jackshit about Fascism, certainly never read Gentili or any other primary font. Read 100 questions by Oswald Mosley to get a grip

[@thinksetsoup5790]

@@cheekguardian1378how? Have you gone through history class? Don’t tell me you’re one of the morons that believe that ww2 never happened and Adolf Hitler didn’t exist.

[@dumbbumsc5329]

Very quick and clear with good visual aids. Learning is never more enjoyable. I am absolutely subscribing

[@AImighty_Loaf]

Excellent, perfect video for a low attention span zoomer

[@JayHoffmann842]

This will be a giant channel in a few months. Keep making content like this. Seems like you’ve done it before. Very natural

[@symbolsarenotreality4595]

Only for reactionaries.

[@normalchannel2185]

Bro joined 15 days ago, posted 2 vids and is already on featured/trending charts with total views above 1M madlad,

[@taliacheng5006]

@@normalchannel2185I think this is redeemed zoomer, who has another channel that is focused on spreading his presbytarian (branch of christianity) faith. He made a really good all christianities/all religions video before

[@normalchannel2185]

@@taliacheng5006 it seemed like his style tbh

[@EpicnessYeet]

​@@taliacheng5006redeemed zoomer's voice is more pitched than this creator's voice, but i can see that he was probably inspired by redeemed zoomer.

[@marvinmiller2983]

I'm glad you distinguished liberalism and progressivism because it seems nowadays, those two terms are used interchangeably, and a lot of people who call themselves conservative today actually align with a lot of traditionally liberal values.

[@camerapasteurize7215]

I like how this shows how there's significant overlap in many of these ideologies, so you can see how anyone can define their beliefs to include multiple of these. I also appreciate how you showed that progressivism and liberalism are not the same thing! People tend to refer to progressives as liberals, which implies that people who don't hold progressive viewpoints don't support classical liberalism. Edit: to everyone responding complaining about the difference between modern liberalism and classical liberalism, yes. I understand there is a difference, and I'm not advocating to stop calling modern liberals "liberals" even though most of their ideals have little overlap with classical liberalism. I'm just pointing out a lesser known fact. I myself am more of a libertarian in terms of political views, with conservative morals.

[@jfast8256]

Especially since liberals believe in freedom of speech and individualism where modern progressives are extremely authoritarian and collectivist. What is "progressivism" was definitely answered for it's core belief. However, it's followers today have adopted parts of both fascism (minus the nationalism) and authoritarianism (expect the power being held by the mob). As an atheist liberal I cannot stand the modern progressive. They are evil to the core.

[@Habib_Xon]

I've known that they are different. However Im most definitely not going to stop using the term to encompass all liberals

[@jfast8256]

@@Habib_Xon progressives are NOT liberal. Me, a liberal, my WORST political rival enemy is the progressive. We are nothing alike. I'm free speech, they are censorship. I'm protect the individual, they are authoritarian. I'm free market capitalism, they are socialism. Calling a "progressive" a liberal is just as stupid as calling a man a "woman" (something dumb ass progressives do). Do you want to be like a progressive and not know the difference between a man and woman or a liberal and a progressive?

[@Yuvraj.]

@@Habib_Xon Why? It's inaccurate to call all progressives liberals, and vice versa. Why purposefully make that error?

[@ericraululyeetusdelyeetus5028]

​@@Yuvraj. I suppose because it's all too common for the two terms to be conflated, it's nearly impossible to discuss something political while making this distinction...and expecting the one you're conversing with to, in good faith, get the point, and start also making this distinction. Long story told short, because it's simpler this way unfortunately.

[@ArtemisSkyeB]

One small thing I noticed that stuck out to me: Under the communism section, you put a house to represent private property. That would not be private property unless you are using it to make money. Private property is stuff like the factories, machines, and anything else used to produce wealth. A house, your toothbrush, etc. would be personal property, and it would be yours and you would keep it. I hope I explained it well. I’m really tired rn

[@quaksbongos658]

So true, thank u tired lesbian

[@mymelo-kz8xs]

What if you sew clothes in your house and sell the clothes

[@salmonandsoup]

@@mymelo-kz8xs You're not using the house itself to make money. Everyone needs a home to live in; housing is a human right (or it should be). Unless the house itself is specifically what makes you money, it's personal property.

[@TheFeralcatz]

Most communist regimes did seize private homes though.

[@ArtemisSkyeB]

@@aaaaa-tx3qb In that case, that would be an example of workers owning the means of production. A pen, a notebook, paint supplies, etc. are the machines or otherwise used to make a product. So long as that is owned collectively by the workers, it's good. If a job only requires one individual, then that individual owns everything. If a job requires two or more, maybe they each own their individual sewing machine, but they collectively own the business or factory. The simple answer is: The workers should own the items and things needed to make a product, regardless of the number of workers.

[@byronee]

There is one essential part of Fascism that you left out: Fascism heavily advocates for a national rebirth. This is one of the defining reasons why Nazi's were seen as Fascist rather than being strictly authoritarian. The Nazi's believed in a national rebirth which in their case, was the Third Reich.

[@MrBenMcLean]

Yeah except that literally everybody believes in national rebirth. Obama certainly did. Lincoln concluded his Gettysburg Address with, "that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom." So just because the Nazis happened to have something in common with literally everybody without exception doesn't make literally everybody without exception a Nazi.

[@KiwiSpartan01]

Thank you

[@ScreamingManiac]

Its funny how many people are called nazis today because when you actually think about what nazism actually is. There would be like 0.000001% of people today who actually hold that ideology.

[@luccaprado1]

That and Fascism is also a type of corporatism.

[@Zzzzzzzxxxxxxxx]

And Hegelian idealism, which without it’s not even possible to have fascism as it’s the starting point. Economics too I guess with syndicalism and corporatism

[@WhaddeyaTalkeenabeet]

This channel never fails to teach me about things 100x better than school ever did

[@rtristan8572]

You clicked becouse politics. I clicked becouse cute ideollogy balls. We are not the same.

[@Spubbily01]

Based

[@taureon_]

i clicked because i saw a female anarcho ball

[@sauliusvitkauskas8741]

@@taureon_ bro really said: smas-

[@thejanitor3263]

I clicked for both

[@spunchflopbadpants]

@@taureon_ Panty and Stocking anarchy

[@Monderoth]

That was a surprisingly accurate description of anarchism. It sounds like it was taken right from Kropotkin, and that's a level of understanding that I genuinely didn't expect.

[@KarlSnarks]

When he said socialism is an umbrella term and showed anarchism as one of the words under the umbrella, I knew he was going to give a fair definition of anarchism.

[@e66iu]

When I watched that part on anarchism, I thought, "hey, that doesn't sound bad...wait...have I been lied to... again?" I know nothing of Kroptkin, but I'm intrigued to find out based on this comment. Anarchism doesn't just devolve into "violence hierarchy" like I was taught? (like: zombie apocalypse rules, battle royale rules, smash bros free for all rules)

[@BlueRidgeBubble]

It's anarchism. Who cares if you're fair? It's as realistic a system of government for our time as a government comprised of platypie and unicorns.

[@BlueRidgeBubble]

​@@e66iuYes. It does. Because that is the nature of man. We aren't enlightened things, we are just animals. It would be nice to live in a world where something like this could exist, but devolution and the slippery slope are real when it comes to humanity.

[@KarlSnarks]

@@e66iu If we're going by examples, there have been instances of anarchist or anarchist-adjacent experiments on larger scale (the largest up to ten million population, so not extremely large), like currently the Zapatistas in Mexico and Rojava in Syria, and historically Makhnovchina in Ukraine and Revolutionary Catalonia and Aragon in the Spanish civil war (fun fact, George Orwell fought alongside them against Franco). Peter Kropotkin was a Russian prince who rejected his title to become an anarchist, and is seen as the father of anarcho-communism, free communes that form confederated associations with other communes, and share in production by need. He's also nicknamed Bread-Santa ;P The yt channel Then & Now has a good introduction to the history of anarchism, and two videos on Joseph Proudhon (a Mutualist anarchist). Anark has a great series called A Modern Anarchism, though it's on the longer side, and Andrewism is also a good channel. The subreddit r/anarchy101 is very helpful and has a link to an FAQ of the ideology.

[@veilnebula2411]

5:38 from the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh it disgusted me.

[@Monkey_no_luffy]

💀

[@vamperjr1376]

I craved for the strength and certainty of steel.

[@oscramos8298]

Hit the gym

[@veilnebula2411]

@@oscramos8298 i go to gym on a daily basis, i think i still have the right to memes ok?

[@oscramos8298]

yes@@veilnebula2411

[@elijahbachrach6579]

I love how the eyes of the caricatures in the thumb nail tell you how you should feel about each. You’ve saved me a lot of thinking. Thanks

[@mercenarygundam1487]

The fact you used polandball art and makes it easy to digest, makes it worth viewing

[@wtz_under]

fax

[@wtz_under]

i think polandball is taking over, even my sisters history teacher printed a cuba polandball on the worksheet

[@mercenarygundam1487]

@@wtz_under The one time Satire has been used for good.

[@TherionBlueblood]

I didn't even realise that a good amount of those existed, so thanks for actually telling me in a way I can understand. I would be interested in a video that goes in depth on other political ideologies, although even just this video is a great way to understand the surface level of political ideologies.

[@clalam5241]

Yea its almost like politics is an extremely large 3 dimensional spectrum

[@WillySalami]

@@clalam5241 Politics is no spectrum, it's more like a sea, I mean, I dare you to place Duginism, Conservatism, Carlism, Fascism, Social-Democracy, Marxist Socialism, Liberalism and Anarchism in a 3-dimensional spectrum.

[@thetalantonx]

When you start getting more granular it's worth having them explained and defined as in neutral a way as possible like this, and then having each explained/defined/attacked/defended by proponents and opponents. The more specific an explanation becomes the more you can get lost in minutiae and have "positives" taken for granted or dismissed. If you can find honest opponents, it's really fascinating to have a system defended by someone who dislikes it - you know "what are the best features of X system that you wish Y (your system) had?"

[@misterboxhead3045]

Do you still remember half of these?

[@AquaBlue77]

I really liked your short minimalistic, to-the-point, uncomplicated explaining of each ideology. I understood everything here. While big, long-winded, complicated videos trying to explain the same things, just tend to confuse me even more. You've just got both a like and subscribe from me...

[@AImighty_Loaf]

"Now I'm an expert on everything after ingesting 10 seconds of information on a specific topic. My opinions and perspectives hold more merit now"

[@MountainDaughter]

my little brainy wainey no like big talky walky so i likey wikey small time wordy dirtys.

[@ElSandwich777]

@@AImighty_Loaf MEGA KEK. They were saying that the explanations were simple enough that a child could grasp it, while simultaneously comparing it to Political SlutSmores you can get virtually anywhere else on the Tube. There was no boast of superiority here, save for the one response that followed it.

[@ollie44444]

Yip yap yap yap

[@prettygreenbud]

@@AImighty_Loafyou’re sad

[@keifer7813]

0:18 Who could oppose that? Edit: Actually, that's more classical liberalism than modern liberalism

[@Balen-]

right!?

[@rockstar-made]

Millions of people do because logic can't beat stupidity/indoctrination

[@user-sw6th8od5v]

Non secular backward countries? Conservatives?

[@josharko111]

I think it's also worth explaining the difference between private and personal property. When discussing politics, private property means that which is owned by companies, while personal property is that which an individual owns. A restaurant is private property, your microwave is personal property.

[@Grundrisse]

There's no difference between these two! Karl Marx wants to take away my Funko Pop.

[@rafaelpupo1908]

Glad somebody explained it

[@vitulus_]

If I use my computer for work at home is that private or personal property?

[@josharko111]

@@vitulus_ if you bought it, it's personal.

[@vitulus_]

@@josharko111 Yeah but I buy other tools for my business that are solely used for work. I'd be surprised if they were personal?

[@wilder11]

One thing y'all should keep in mind is that few of these are actually mutually exclusive. Many of these "teams" could work together, in theory. Some do in the real world. Others are complete contradictory but become allies anyway. TL;DR it's rarely ever just the one thing. Great video man.

[@ronster.]

nah, none of these can coincide.

[@boythefather9868]

Indeed, capitalism and socialism are different and contradictory in economic context. However, environmentalism and egalitarianism can be augmented depending whether businesses practices corporate social responsibility and the general public truly want to create an egalitarian society.

[@ronster.]

i was kidding btw i posted this for sillies w/ a friend (its an inside joke)

[@alexdraco9926]

Indeed I find myself under the umbrella of no less than 4 of these ideologies

[@wilder11]

@@ronster. Well I'm glad you had fun.

[@TheNightbean]

Ya know, I usually associate these little political blob dudes with online brain rot, but this was legitimately informative. Thank you! I’m looking forward to part 2!!

[@Nyx__]

The people who use these blobs unironically are often very brain rotted. The blobs do however make for a good way to illustrate the different ideologies into their flags and give them some "personality".

[@thelitmango6333]

​​​​@@Nyx__"ah yes you fools that use the little colorful blob have brain rot, but me an over 20 year old male with an anime profile pic doesn't have any brain rot."

[@NisangaiZ]

​@@thelitmango6333No offense to the first guy but that was hilarious

[@Anonymous_Whisper]

Noo lol 😆🤣 it was rott 100%

[@Anonymous_Whisper]

@@thelitmango6333 read what you wrote 😂

[@Connorthecatsdad]

It's amazing how when various ideologies are summarized briefly and with objectivity, you can see common ground with ideologies you may have found yourself opposed to, and maybe some room for criticism of those with which you already align. Great video

[@serenitythelefty4916]

I feel like some of these are less political ideologies and more economic ideologies or philosophical ideologies (transhumanism for example) which might be confusing for some people. Other than that this was a surprisingly good video covering the very basic overview of these without going into overwhelming depth.

[@DemonKing19951]

To be fair, there really isn't a classical political ideology that isn't also an economic ideology. Governments/groups of humans formed to make their resource lasted longer and were easier to get. Almost every basic aspect of society expends from that basic concept. Even things like authoritarianism which seems completely political is still entrusting one person with the job of a least deciding who allocates resources and what land they acquire. You have to get to incredibly modern stuff before you really start seeing political views purely based non-physical concepts. Most people actually in power need to have some idea of what resources should go where and democracies/republics/most other governments with real divisions of power and responsibility really didn't thrive until relatively recently.

[@Outlaw7263]

Transhumanism is basically either the Adeptus Mechanicus from Warhammer 40k or Maelstrom from Cyberpunk.

[@cryptguard]

@@Outlaw7263GOD BLESS THE OMNISSIAH

[@KarlSnarks]

Political and economic ideologies often overlap, because your economic views will often also shape how you think government should be run and how involved it should be (or not exist at all). Philosophical ideologies that have ideas about society also often have a political component.

[@Robisquick]

Thank you for not injecting too much dogmatic undertone into what should be as transparently educational and unbiased as possible. I’m thanking you because so so many other channels will often use what seems to be straightforward education and inject undertones that automatically cast aspersions onto on side and use flowery and appealing language for the side they hope to make seem good. But that poisons the well unless it’s stated that the video will contain political opinion and bias

[@Maxel53]

Exactly what I wanted to say but much more well written

[@nekrataali]

The choices of what he considered to be ideologies itself is dogmatic and reveals his own political opinions and bias lmao 😂

[@Danielle14..6]

@@nekrataali how

[@Robisquick]

Yep. There will always be some bias and selectivity. But it feels like he came at this with good enough faith that he stands apart from the normal and mass quantity alternate media conglomorates modus which is to have the video seem educational but they have a clear higher goal in mind of teaching people just how bad the other political party is. I'm speaking more to the bloodsports team politics of left v right. It's just nice to have someone who has at least some degree of wanting to explain what the topic of the video actually is, regardless of if it's perfectly unbiased. @@nekrataali

[@revival_of_the_canned_justice]

The liberalism explanation is wrong, they want the opposite of most things the guy said (at least at the time I'm writing this)

[@NoopyP]

If this video didn't exist, I would have never gone out of my away to better understand the spectrum of different political ideologies because I'm pretty much apolitical (although one of my friends who's very into politics has guessed I'd be an anarchist). So thank you for providing me with this information in a small amount of time.

[@OraTorgrurhh]

Nobody is apolitical, you just don't have the right words to put on your ideas/opinions (anarchism could be a start). Almost everything you do and think has some political ramifications.

[@NoopyP]

@@OraTorgrurhh I totally understand that but it's not just not knowing the terminology, it's also that I simply don't have a clear opinion on many issues because I'm not informed on them, either because I haven't been exposed to them, because I see both sides, or because I don't care enough. But I guess that would simply be being moderate?

[@codyluna7065]

@@NoopyP The price for refusing to participate in politics is becoming governed by your inferiors. -some Greek dude.. When you realize that the true purpose of political structures is to control the information we get it can really shock you into paying attention why things are the way they are and why so many people are, like yourself, apolitical by design. To determine who owns you, first determine who you aren't allowed to criticize.

[@yoututiitdlrlrkrkr560]

Just be careful because the real world usage of these online is that of a label for a tribe which may include random extraneous other ideas that they will enforce on anyone they can.

[@xviii5780]

​​@@OraTorgrurhh Apolitical = doesn't want to engage in political struggle or take sides

[@thebteamgamingchannel5701]

Parts of this need updating. You did a great job of explaining how all of these ideals originally started and what their doctrine was in the beginning, but some of those ideals have been hijacked in recent years and are no longer what they claim to be.

[@1c0nic_player]

none of these will ever be perfect, these are just the ideas they’re founded on. it looks different in context or with dumb and corrupt ppl

[@DeeDolp]

Imagine my surprise when I discover this channel, love two videos, say “wow, this channel is really good, im gonna watch their backlog” only to learn that there is five total videos on the entire channel and it (deservedly) got 90k subs in the past month or so

[@dominusalicorn3684]

This is because he's capitalizing on the fresh new genre of video called "every [blank] explained in # minutes" with a white background and simple logos in colored circles, pioneered by Redeemed Zoomer last year.

[@dominusalicorn3684]

@@rama-rao-y8u it's not bad. Sorry if using the word "capitalizing" made it sound like that, but I was informing the commenter that the reason this channel got quite popular in such a short time was because the format was already popularized last year by another channel.

[@KalebPeters99]

This was fantastic! I'm loving the trend of low production quality but high information density educational content. Subscribed!

[@Squiddo-gt6xu]

It's so rare to find a video like this that is completely un-biased and just gives you the facts. Subscribed 👍

[@PritchardPub]

But they didn’t. They took 1 second to say 3 things about conservatives and then kept going on and on about how liberals love various freedoms so much. One of the biggest ones being gun ownership though, is embraced by conservatives along with many others including free speech. And no, we aren’t conservatives. Just making an observation others clearly missed.

[@Acrocanthosaurus]

@karaqakkzl What does "reallity is a left-wing bias" mean?

[@DawgOffical]

its surprisingly amazing how accurately and simply he describes and explains all of this good job

[@darkwowplayer]

Crazy how almost all of these actually sound pretty good on paper, yet we know how bad they are in practice.

[@xedeanz9324]

Fr especially capitalism

[@darkwowplayer]

@@xedeanz9324 Captialism is actually one of the few that is proven to work decently well, albeit it's not perfect, but mixing Capitalism with certain ideals of other systems has worked very well for the many first world countries that have adopted it. I was mostly referencing Communism, Communalism, and Socialism.

[@dannybonsai7102]

yup, it marries well with liberalism that may act to preserve individual rights as well as a free market, just reeling it in so it doesn't evolve into corporatocracy.@@darkwowplayer

[@gambasfritasconcorbata5936]

​@@darkwowplayercapitalism demonstrably doesn't work, it's destroyed the environment and forces people to starve

[@USSAnimeNCC-]

All of these what about nazism non of is good on paper unless your a other hating maniac

[@Foirfemusic]

A breath of fresh air to find an educational youtube channel that gets straight to the point and explains everything on a level understandable to most(I would assume ;) ) subbed! excited to learn more!

[@davejoseph5615]

This was a good idea although some of these are merely political priorities rather than political systems. You might also consider a video describing how these can be blended or corrupted.

[@pieines7299]

I like what has being tried here, but I feel rather uneasy on some definition. I know that the author tried to be objective in those numerous definition, but it seem we are mistaking the robe for the monk here. I mean by that that people under ideology will claim that something is their focus, while in fact, movement born from this ideology usually have another objective. it being more a cover for another less... sellable. Nazi under nazism seemed more than willing to bend what is a aryan/subhumain as long as it suited them, especially when material expropriation or general opposition to anything lefty was in the table. The aryan thingy seem to be more decorum than the core principle, which is "the nation need a all powerful authority unimpeded by law or morality to do what it see fit to save the nation from it's internal and external menace" which itself hide the political backstabing and personal gain that govern nazi politics. And, you could say that would not be applying the real theorical nazi, but if nazi are not nazi, who are ? I feel like a lot of the ideology described here are in that situation.

[@USSAnimeNCC-]

Well fascism do tend to lead nazism except their not alway nazi like the anti-trans and anti-lgbt rhetoric coming form the far right but we don’t call them nazi we call them fascist or authoritarian

[@rompevuevitos222]

All systems can be corrupted or blended in equal ways. Dictatorships and monarchies can both arise from anarchism, communism and capitalism alike. Capitalism allows uncapped generational wealth which leads to single people holding enough power to rule. Since money = power. Or just allowing someone to hoard wealth trough dirty means and then using said money to avoid consequences. Communism (as it's been done in the past) puts production under leaders, and in communism production = power. It is also pretty funny because the whole point of communism is that the PEOPLE control the production, but since no leader actually ever did communism this never really was attempted. In anarchism, there is a power vacuum ready for the taking. It's just a matter of time.

[@YouTubeAccount-ie7xb]

“Political 👉Ideology👈”

[@user-si7qi4xtriad]

​@@USSAnimeNCC-what do we call a far left group that advocates violence against a person or group who doesnt align with their political/personal beliefs? Is that even a thing? Im not really political , but there is always a mirror.

[@myuniversemyself8493]

I've never commented on KZbin but I've never seen such simple, direct, educational, not boring, and straight video. Just amazing I'll look forward to get more of your videos keep it up.

[@MrSafari1998]

Good video there ! If I can add something : Populism is sometimes not seen as an ideaology but more as a polotical strategy to access to power !

[@WindowsLoading]

Ahhh yes someone finally understands Anarchism, it’s not the belief of everyone needs to be in pure anarchy all the time, but of the 100% freedom of the individual and that you don’t necessarily need a government. I love the unbiased presentation here, and the willingness to present all forms of an idea. No matter how… rough the ideology might seem to everyone else.

[@cashewnuttel9054]

I am pro-imperialism. Not the bad side of it part but the "nations who are rich and know how to run a nation should run poor countries" part. Many countries that were given their "freedom" are today very poor, very corrupt, run by tyrants, lost many of their basic human rights and freedoms, infested by extremists, and ironically the people of these poor countries are running off to rich countries - many to their former colonizer's nations. And let's be honest, none of them are actually doing anything to fix it. And it would be fine if these poor countries could keep their problems to themselves, but they don't, they spread to other countries. And it would be fine if you can actually see progress in these poor countries but again, you don't; what little progress you see just comes from the fact that they are at the bottom of the barrel and therefore have nowhere to go but up. Very little of these problems would have existed had they just remained under the rich nations rule. Nationalism can be very destructive and just divides humanity. "People should have the right to self-determination".... not if it is destructive.

[@robbydudley1124]

Unfortunately without a somewhat capable government there is nothing that can stop an anarchistic society from being attacked by another.

[@Che18335]

@@cashewnuttel9054thats sounds good in theory, but in reality, you can not force people to believe in what you believe. A nation must come to a conclusion by its own people on how they want to run their country and how they gonna fight corrupt leaders and governments. It took decades, education, protests and many wars in ,,progressive nations‘‘ to reach that level. If a nation is left to progress on its own and helped in its progress by other nations with a good will, it can naturaly prosper. If its forced and with military power, the problems and opression that comes along are greater than the benefits (killing of innocents, destroying old social structures by force, forcing of not known costums on them, prejudice etc). And usually the imperialits dont come with good faith to help the natives. We have seen that in almost any colonial setting. Resistance will be the inevitable answer. Best recent example - Afghanistan. Up until the 60/70s it progressed in many areas, it may have seem slow and there were many things to solve, but that takes usually time. The soviet intervention to ,,help a brother nation‘‘ destroyed the country all progress that was made was lost. A civil war broke out and put the country on reset. Than the americans came and tried to ,,help‘‘, but in reality gave power to corrupt leaders and built a not sustainable system based on corruption and military force. Resistance was formed and the intruders had to leave in shame. Like the russians before. Now they are back at square one. My point is, it never worked and never will. No matter how noble the intentions may be. If you want to help ,,underdeveloped‘‘ countries, you should read up on how these corrupt leaders came to power, where do they get their wapons and money and who is holding their back. You will come full circle and may consider that next time you are voting.

[@Tove5th]

Forgive me if I'm wrong but is this not just a tweaked version of the idea of tribalism, and if not tribalism if we are looking at it through a government point of view then confederalism

[@halbaloney4593]

Anarchism is the default state of humanity... until you have neighbors.

[@lts_Abdullah]

A video without an intro is just a breath of fresh air

[@GaionSputro]

How KZbin video should be.

[@katze256]

Straight to the point, nice. Never heard of syndicalism before, i like the sound of it.

[@MemeNerd420]

I never knew how to frame my political ideology but now i know. I believe in communitarianism, and a few others.

[@dabbingraccoons6416]

Yes I hate the left right system too. It isolates and creates extremes on both sides who are extremely opposed and violent to eachother.

[@frankwalker5921]

It's so true that it's unreal.

[@brandonreal916]

um might need to dive a little deeper this is. Ideals quickly summed up and generalized probly makes communism look great to everyone who never lived under it.

[@TheHammy2211]

​@@brandonreal916And you need to learn to read, because they didn't even say communism. They said communitarianism, which is a completely separate ideology.

[@foundationuser5043]

@@brandonreal916 5:53 would be a great part of the video to watch for you 😊

[@Epic_R3K47]

I needed this. Made up my own country. But couldn't decide what ideology to pick.

[@scottanos9981]

When in doubt, moderate out. 😅

[@exotic1405]

I made a country. It's called fip. The population count is 1 and its me, also the territory spans across the entire planet. Get off my land

[@Epic_R3K47]

@@exotic1405 Who are you.

[@enexua_07]

The president of fip, i guess ? @@Epic_R3K47

[@SamuelDiaz-j1t]

lmao@@exotic1405

[@dannybrat3127]

I learned more about our government in 8 minutes than years of social studies

[@plugshirt1762]

@@schmiggidy Doesn't that stick hurt?

[@foundationuser5043]

@@schmiggidy What??? Another student didn’t learn from textbooks and hour long lectures like you did??? WHATTT. I can’t believe not every kid learns the same way!!! 😱😱😱😱 Crazy man. Almost like some people are different than you.

[@foundationuser5043]

@@plugshirt1762 Must have haha, since he mocks others for not remembering the lessons. I finished all dash 1 Social studies, but my memory still slips sometimes since I wasn’t beat I guess lol.

[@peapod5629]

​@@foundationuser5043let's be honest you probably aren't a real "visual learner" or whatnot, you just don't have the willpower and self control to listen to your teachers and classes 😢😮😅😂😊

[@traderben9530]

​@@peapod5629Nah I genuinely absorb info better through reading at my own pace. I can't be the only one. I borderline passed/failed many classes, but quickly picked up statistics and calculus on my own when my job called for it. Wheras in school those two had very low grades despite putting in the hours.

[@SorinaPopescu-w5r]

great job! summed up complex topics in a quick, digestable format, with relatively little bias. your attention to differentiating the concepts between certain groups (communism/socialism, fascism/nazism for example) was helpful and more informative than a lot of media i find myself seeing. i did find the feminism topic to be maybe a little oversimplified, in fact, a deeper dive into feminism as a whole would be great to see. there's a clear difference to the feminism movement 50+ years ago and generally speaking, how it's aged each decade.

[@normalname7026]

I like how you separate the words with different definitions, but a lot of these words intersect and I think people aren’t seeing that

[@Fopenplop]

Yeah, maybe historically contingent positions, boutique internet labels, and centuries-long political traditions that have actually wielded power (that is, the thing which politics is actually about) shouldn't be treated as equivalent and each given their own little cartoon characters.

[@kristijanveljaca1687]

This is amazing! You should make a part 2, there are so many more ideologies to cover

[@ThePaintExplainer]

I'm probably going to do that!

[@Sandy-qr2ff]

I don't know how you manage to make the ideologies sound so horendeous, sci-fi and good, into a neutral view at the same time

[@turbulence6]

genuinely a breath of fresh air to see an unbiased video covering most major ideologies

[@Fluxquark]

It's really interesting how in Western democracies, most parties which call themselves "liberal" are actually economically liberal social conservatives. Same goes for most conservative parties (I've never seen a conservative party serious about conserving the environment for example).

[@Ichabod_Jericho]

In America, the media hyperbolizes both sides opinions so both sides think the other side is comprised of mostly extremists. It’s a good tactic to make sure no meaningful progress gets made. Thats why’s all libs think trad cons are lead paint drinking inbreds, and why conservatives think libs are drug addicted naive kids.

[@jacksonconstantine5740]

Conservative and conservationist aren’t the same thing

[@fritsdaalmans5589]

The solution to that is to use a 2-dimensional representation, called a "political compass". Just left vs right is one-dimensional, and leaves out important nuance. It's a bit vague how to calculate your position in this 2-D space. This is a wiki page about the website political compass: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Political_Compass It still has the "left" vs "right" division (the horizontal axis, economic policy), but it ALSO has a vertical axis, social policy, from "more authoritarian" to "more presonal freedom". E.g. Greens and Communists are both on the "left" economic side, but communism is very authoritarian ("up") and the greens believe in libertarian personal freedom ("down") (as long as you are not polluting the environment too much, I guess). It shows that they shouldn't be jumbled together.

[@AAb-wh5im]

Conservatives in North America are liberal, the classical variant including on social issues

[@Fluxquark]

@@fritsdaalmans5589 Of course I know the political compass, it's largely useless in it's most common iteration because leftwing economics and libertarian are strongly correlated while rightwing economics and authoritarian are strongly correlated so the whole thing is pretty much one dimensional again. There are no people who are economically rightwing but also in favour of personal freedom. Now you might say that US libertarians/anarcho-capitalists are exactly this, but that isn't the case, if you follow their economic beliefs to their logical conclusion, you end up with personal freedom being contingent on personal wealth/capital. Likewise, the main difference between anarchists and communists is which strategy they believe will work to achieve their ideal society. In both cases they strife for a society with a lot of personal freedom. Communists however believe that this society needs proper management while anarchists believe it can self-organise somehow. The political compass generally puts societies without political systems similar to liberal western democracies as authoritarian (even though a one-party state can be much more democratic in most respects than a liberal democracy).

[@nurgleface]

Really good informative video although the only thing I'd add is that while you can't own private property under communism (factories, offices, businesses) you can have personal property (car, toothbrush, house that you live in) just because of how often people get those 2 things confused.

[@Cryo_Gen]

a very good point

[@o00nemesis00o]

It's physically impossible for a communist to explain the 'personal property' distinction without mentioning toothbrushes. A car, though, is a means of production. So is a phone. And people under communism aren't allowed to own a house. Let's be real here. The part that made me laugh out loud in the 'communism' description was right at the end. "...and there's no state." The single most hilarious thing that communists believe about communism is that the iron dictators needed to bring in communism, are going to give up all their power.

[@gameLode]

Yeah i found it very weird how he used a house to represent private property, cuz that would be personal property

[@backslash4141]

House? Car? you get gulag and can brush teeth with stick I found, da?

[@brocklastname6682]

People in the Soviet Union didn't get to own their houses. You lived in it at the pleasure of the gov. Cars? You can get on a 3 year waiting list for a POS Lada.

[@BloodHunter7official]

Thank you! My friends didn't understand very many politics, so I showed them this video to clear up confusion. Thanks!

[@The.Naga.Patriot]

7:25 Austrian Painter's favourite

[@LaFemmFatal]

Finally someone using the correct definition for socialism and progressivism, many people in the US people think that socialism is just communism and that liberalism is just progressivism. Socialism is a democratized form of economy, capitalism is like economic feudalism, the economy doesn’t just affect the process of production and reproduction but cultural aspects of society by proxy, businesses still exist in socialism it’s just they are structured more fairly. Liberals are inherently capitalist, sometimes opting for democratic socialism which is capitalism with some socialist principles Progressives just value progress and are open to new ideas, rather then being stuck on the past/conservatism for the sake of tradition I’m a progressives socialist Edit: Feminism does hold the the idea that women are historically held back and is attempting to equalize not put on sex over another, there doesn’t exist an unbiased view, even if your view is based on research how you interpret and feel about said research is subjective, so while feminism is largely a feminine perspective that doesn’t mean it’s out to get men, individuals may be but the idea is equal opportunity and rights under government, this does not mean we are pushing to be treated the exact same, it’s just not the laws or societies place to determine who can succeed based on gender norms, I prefer liberation and equity over equality, put I do value these principles along with humanitarianism, and while the environment is important I don’t care as much about it as I probably should, lol

[@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.]

_"Socialism is a democratized form of economy, "_ Wrong. Has nothing to do with democracy whatsoever. Socialism is an economic system where the collective (such as workers, guilds, the government etc.) either directly own or control the buildings and tools that make goods and services like farms and factories. This can be achieved through decentralized and direct worker-ownership, or through centralized state-ownership or control of the means of production.

[@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.]

_"capitalism is like economic feudalism, "_ Wrong. Capitalism is nothing like feudalism. On the contrary, feudalism is closer to a mixed economy system or state socialism.

[@LaFemmFatal]

@@Historia.Magistra.Vitae. I wasn’t being literal, I was saying I think of socialism as a progression of capitalism, whereas the people have more control, the idea of democracy is to give the people more control so I was comparing the two in that sense, my comparison to feudalism was just a short way for me to say it’s outdated and concentrates power in the hands of elites, liberalism just strengthens that power that the elites have by a few times fold It’s just the way I conceptualize these stances, it’s more metaphorical then literal, I was using the ideas and applying them to other terms, not the term itself in its totality

[@LaFemmFatal]

@@Historia.Magistra.Vitae. In my version of socialism workers would have representatives who help control the economy, I wouldn’t want to strip people from being a president of their own business etc, they can still get credit and be the face in that way, I just think dynamics might be a bit better if workers had more say in the economy their under, second the economy effects the social, third I decide politics into three parts the social government/government system republic oligarchy etc…, the social/people (the public opinions), culture war, debate, etc, and finally the economic system or who controls the means, I don’t think any of these things have to be binary, I mean we are in a democratic republic which isn’t a system I dislike I just don’t think we are making the best use of it, but these systems tend to inform each other and work interjectionally

[@LaFemmFatal]

@@Historia.Magistra.Vitae. Also state socialism would just be communism

[@stevenvargas6863]

Love the channel. Keep this theme of short, concise videos that educate on things about the world. Can’t wait for future videos!

[@eneaganh6319]

I wouldn't call feminism a political ideology, more like a social movement

[@juannaym8488]

Political ideology and social movement are sometimes hard to differentiate. There are parties and governments that have defined feminism as their core value, so I think this fits here

[@farkasabel]

If feminism is a political ideology then mgtow as well.

[@AngryFeminist30]

​@@farkasabelthe difference there is that mgtow already reached the height of its popularity in roughly 2016 to 2019 and even then it never achieved even close to the overall notoriety or puplicity that feminism did, whether by chance or design you be the judge.

[@farkasabel]

@@AngryFeminist30 it did. Although it became "red pill". Andrew Tate and other manosphere podcasts and ideologs already made a change. High school student males already lean towards these ideas.

[@farkasabel]

@@AngryFeminist30 plus in many countries the military/defensive capabilities are dwindling due to the lack of manpower as many these man who traditionally gave the capable fighting force to the countries refuse to fight for it.

[@Kelsey-b3o]

Really appreciate your ability to remain non bias in a politically themed video, good job man!!

[@lovecraftianwalrus4490]

I’m curious, how did you decide what ideologies to include and what ideologies to leave out? Also, great video! I subscribed and am looking forward to your upcoming content.

[@thesuperdragonrelic9739]

These are the most common/popular

[@makanahellberg8537]

There's probably a lot of overlap, and niche ideologies that would be either repetitive to include, or not mainstream enough. And specific political parties may not encompass enough topics to be it's own entry. Idk though

[@multivitamin425]

Average political compass fan

[@brazil_is_a_africa538]

fr wheres my posadism explained ffs they're oppressing the one true ideology

[@gangautism]

I guess what's just most popular/defining on the political spectrum

[@RAVIBOSSEMA]

Great video! I just want to point out that you use a picture of a house to describe that a communist society doesn't have private property, but a house is actually personal property, which would still exist in a communist society

[@popeyethepirate5473]

Lol

[@25439]

You get the idea though.

[@elkabat5205]

​@@25439well yeah but in video as unbiased and well worded as this one (which it still is) it's still worth pointing out when there's a mistake right?

[@iamacatinthejungle]

​@@elkabat5205i think people will never understand the difference between private property and personal property it's... tough

[@megamanx1291]

I love the idea of communism, anarchism and socialism.

[@AltrTheEgo]

Glad to see something not condescending to the right or left and laced with fear tactics. Good explanations and nuanced instead of lumping certain things together(Nazism/facism, Socialism/Communism)

[@WatcherPrime]

They should all be called Socialism.

[@AltrTheEgo]

@WatcherPrime that's the propaganda talking my friend. The first 2 are a form of societal theory(highly linked together) while the second 2 are a form of economic theory(also higjly linked together). Understanding the differences in each is important when analyzing history as it's being made in current day, as in those times they didn't have words or definitions recorded like we are privileged with.

[@Etrehumain123]

@@WatcherPrime They should not since they are extremely different things, rooted from the same vague concept

[@Thomas.T8]

This is an amazing channel😆 I'm learning so much! Thank you for your content.

[@primprim6965]

I would argue that the USA is very close to a corporatocracy. Private corporations control policy making in almost every single sector, including healthcare, housing, etc. Not directly, but corruption is pretty much legal in US politics

[@tootleswoodles8278]

It’s really sad tbh

[@informitas0117]

Well, you guys made bribery legal a while ago so naturally only those with a lot of cash gets a say.

[@simplecodingnow789]

Perhaps a liberal corporatocracy according to this video's standards

[@Greg-in-Orange]

Yeah we should just be like the rest of the world so we won't have any problems with corruption.

[@mayflowerkid4422]

"very close", lol Elon is running the country now

[@molybdaen11]

I love that you sneak in Transhumanism. Every rimworld player would be proud.

[@2spicy_memes342]

"From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh -"

[@molybdaen11]

@@2spicy_memes342 „You can give me no scars if I have no flesh left.”

[@ThePaintExplainer]

We have a connoisseur 🍷

[@blockbustermusic4048]

I didn’t read the title and figured out pretty quickly this wasn’t a, What Angry Bird Are You test

[@kjpersonalcoaching3984]

Hahaha

[@watchwhenbored8817]

I thought the same thing looking at the thumbnail ngl

[@BINSNEWS]

Great summary. I don't know if all Moderates are within the Overton Window, but I'm glad U brought it up.

[@sadaasdafa8635]

Very nicely explained. Nice to cut through the general terms people use for one another as insults or propaganda to get a better definition of the political terms themselves. I’ll be interested to see how you approach monarchism in the future! Particularly in defining its sub-groups, such as feudal system, modern autocratic, and modern constitutional variants.

[@ahmadtallal4292]

i dont think monarxhism is a word tho

[@primprim6965]

I would argue Capitalism is just an evolved form of Monarchism. Same concept, except under capitalism, the "royals" are the owner class.

[@urphakeandgey6308]

You know a political video is legit when they define "liberalism" using, what I would consider, the more correct classical definition. "Dominant ideology in the modern world." Yes, thank you. Even most US conservatives are basically classical liberals with varying degrees of social conservatism.

[@damackabet.4611]

your not 100% wrong, i was reading his take of liberalism, and was like about 70% of what he said is part of conservatism. Only a few things weren't required to be considered a conservative by what he said. Although if a conservative believed everything he said here of liberalism they be considered a conservative by pretty much everyone in usa, or at least right wing.

[@solarwolf1336]

I'm a conservative myself, and a lot of what he described in liberalism I agreed with, despite me frequently disagreeing with self proclaimed liberals. It seems not only has the political scale shifted and changed overtime, but that many people, including myself, are uneducated on what the actual meanings of each ideology really are.

[@tootroottoot]

I would like to add more for the communism part (which I think you summarised very well, especially for under a minute). Its often misconstrued that “private property” (in regards to communism) means stuff like your car, your house, your pets, etc., stuff that you own, but no. In Marxist literature, private property refers to “a social relationship in which the property owner takes possession of anything that another person or group produces with that property”. Basically, it refers to the means of/assets for production, such as: land, raw materials, factories, etc. Stuff like your car, clothing, pets, etc. falls into personal property, things that are not socially owned. Communists want to abolish private property, not personal property.

[@notmenotme614]

Also Communism has a planned economy controlled by the Government. For example, it’s the Government who controls factories and farms. And it’s the Government who decide how much is produced, where and when. The Government will control factory A to make parts for factory B. Profits are reinvested into the factory rather than go to a CEO and shareholders. Nationalisation.

[@gibbamon]

also authoritarian was missed out on this one

[@NickNackItaliano777]

​​@gibbamon Agreed, plus I completely disagree with how he said there is no state under communism as the state basically owns everything under that system, well the Stalinist, Pol Pot, Kim and Maoist versions anyway

[@daniele2026]

@@NickNackItaliano777 What he was referring to was the objective of communism: a stateless, moneyless and classelss society. You still have a state in what is the transitional period between capitalism and communism, that is, socialism

[@thatpandaz6094]

@@NickNackItaliano777 Communism is the a stateless, moneyless and classless society, it has never been done before. Socialism is the transitionary stage between Capitalism and Communism where the goal is to achieve a communist society USSR, China, Cuba and all socialist/ex-socialist countries where exactly that, Socialist. Their goal is to achieve a Communist society and there are a million different ways people think it can be achieved, not just the Marxist-Leninist way that China, USSR and Cuba followed/follows Sweden for example up until the 80s was Democratic Socialist state that was working on its way to Communism through the free market, they used the tax money to buy shares from companies that they gave to unions so normal people would own the companies they worked at, of course neo-liberalism didn't allow it to happen tho unfortunetly and now we're headed to Fascism thanks to neo-liberalism taking its roots.

[@mayonster4798]

what a nice video! i bet the comment section will be civil and nice to each other!

[@shhnaogrita]

great video man, not falling into some traps and general misconceptions about certain ideologies made the video truly informative and precise

[@julianpourdanesh3339]

Extremely well made this should be mandatory watch for anyone eager to enter politics in order to know what the terms used mean

[@bigploppa154]

funnily enough, as ive grown older ive become far more understanding of my college professors adament anarchosyndacalist politics. back then it was really just a big word that i thought he would use to sound smarter than his students. in hindsight, respect to the guy for being that open about his political takes that were largely frowned upon

[@fabrypetty1689]

Anarchosyndicalism will always unvariable derive in an oligarchy of the syndicalist leaders. Syndicates can also work against the good of their workers, syndicate leaders can be corrupt and sell out the owrkers to a company they have an economical agreement with. You ultimately need a state to put them in line.

[@liberalsocialist9723]

​@@fabrypetty1689But can't the same be said for any hierarchy? Its a matter of how much power the lower ranks have 2 replace bad leaders.

[@AceXINFAMY]

@@fabrypetty1689you just described the corporate authoritarianism we have currently

[@thetalantonx]

Every time I read the word I think back to both Noam Chomsky and Monty Python. XD

[@KarlSnarks]

Anarchosyndicalism explicitly organizes from the bottom up, with the local worker councils having primacy over the central council. The delegates they send to the central council are recallable and are only there for a specific task as to not create a possibly exploitable position. Administrators who are tasked with the day-to-day maintanance of syndicate matters can be a weak link, but only if their tasks aren't strictly defined and monitored by delegates and such@@fabrypetty1689

[@ItsMellofficialyMe]

My school made us watch this. I usually watch these videos for fun, but now I get to watch it for work.

[@DiyonJude]

This is actually quite good. Its funny and makes it more memorable in terms of learning. I subbed :D

[@Sprub]

A video that is unbiased, full of info, and nonprofit. Amazing. Keep it up, I'm here to watch.