Every Power 5 Team Ranked

In Today’s Show-
Every Power 5 (plus Gonzaga and St. Mary’s) team ranked! 80 teams!
Sorry to Illinois, Northwestern, and Wisconsin as they should all probably be a little higher than I noted.
Thanks for watching and enjoy!
Give us a like and a follow on
Spotify- open.spotify.c...
Apple Podcasts- podcasts.apple...
Stay updated on our Twitter- / bracketsscience
Stay updated through photos on Instagram- / bracketsscience
For those who prefer to listen to podcasts on KZbin, along with watching some of our video specials, check out our KZbin channel- / @bracketsscience
We are now on TikTok!- / bracketsscience
Subscribe on KZbin and turn on notifications to not miss a beat in preparing for the College Basketball season!

[@Samuel_Massey]

Really in depth work here! Well done! If K State lands Coleman Hawkins, where would you move them to on your list?

[@Bracketsscience]

Thank you my man! If they land Hawkins, I’d say right around the 20 spot. That would be a crazy fun team to watch if they get him.

[@masondooley2494]

@@Bracketssciencemhm

[@wiltchamberlainisthegoat13]

So there are 80 power conference teams plus some strong mid-majors too. This is why I try to explain…..it’s much harder to win an NCAA basketball championship than it is to win a Super Bowl title or an MLB or NBA title. The odds are much slimmer that your team will finish No. 1 out of 80+ teams as opposed to No. 1 out of only 32 teams or 30 teams.

[@jonathanhawkins8379]

obviously as a clemson fan i am biased but 42 is way too low. Our tournament success wasn’t even defined by the guys we lost, PJ Hall actually had a kind of uneventful stretch of games, as did Joe Girard. So we return almost the entire roster, have a top 20 recruiting class, and got 3 productive seniors that may not be superstar-PJ Hall-level replacements, but we covered our bases. I think we EASILY deserve top 30, even if that placement is like 25-30.

[@Bracketsscience]

I’m just worried that having Hall and Girard last year really freed up the other pieces around them. I’m a big fan of Chase Hunter, but I’m just a little hesitant of what’s going to be around him. I hope Lahkin can step in and be a big piece. Brad Brownell was terrific last year, and i’m hoping they can continue to be atop the ACC. Good luck to them this year!

[@chasejohnson6990]

Interesting you have UCLA so low, the starting lineup won’t be that either. Eric Dailey is only 6’8, on a mick cronin team the starting center will be taller, likely William Kyle out of south dakota state. Sebastian Mack also probably won’t start, but will be a backup to Skyy. In the three its likely Kobe Johnson, and the 4 Tyler Bilodeau. The problem with UCLA last year was scoring, so they went out n got scorers in Bilodeau, Clark and Johnson. If Dylan Andrews continues playing the way he did towards the end of the season, scoring will not only not be a problem, but a strength. On the other hand, Mick Cronin teams play defense. With a 15-17 roster they hung in with teams like Marquette, Gonzaga and Arizona last year with such a scoring deficit. Interesting that you wouldn’t rank them higher over teams with question marks like Arizona, Duke, Purdue and Gonzaga. Teams don’t typically score more than 70 on Mick Cronin defenses, and with the surplus in scoring, the Bruins will be a title contender. A lot of guys who wont end up starting, (like Mack, Stefonovic and Mara) would probably start on a lot of these other teams, so the depth is there as well. Anyways a pretty good video, crazy how it doesn’t have a bunch of views.

[@Bracketsscience]

Thank you! And thanks for the information. I’m very excited to see how they perform this year. Love the addition of more offense and depth. Good luck to your Bruins this year!