I enjoy looking at stuff to much in ther hangar so I wanted to share the little things I've been starting at instead of playing the game :) 3% off Gaijin Store and you get my decal too store.gaijin.net/catalog.php?category=WarThunder&partner=IronArmenian&partner_val=u5g16ff2
@motopanzaКүн бұрын
you missed a certain japanese bomber. can you find it?
@mechwarrior7278Күн бұрын
Noooooo you forgot the Grizzly 😭. Poor little guy I love him to death
@colemiller2149Күн бұрын
HEY, red bar on bottom of thumbnail is how KZbin shows that a video is already watched! Change the thumbnail and watch it get more views :) I legit did a double take
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
@@colemiller2149dang, that’s a good point. Okay I’ll think about what new boarder colour to use
@joshuadickinson4614Күн бұрын
12:24 The nose is boxy because curved glass distorts the image through it and makes the sun glint at more angles. It's the same reason the canopy of the AH-1 cobra became more boxy over time. Note that on most aircraft until quite recently you'll find an optically flat panel of glass in most cockpits and bomb aimer positions.
@fishman501Күн бұрын
It probably also makes it easier to manufacture, since curved glass is much more difficult to make (as far as I'm aware)
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
Oh wow, that's a good explanation. Thx :D
@simplsquamКүн бұрын
oh neat, i thought it was because of the distortion curved glass could cause
@ThaGr1mКүн бұрын
@@fishman501 or maybe it's an already existing manufacturing line, so like glass from a car or smth
@corvo6138Күн бұрын
It's wild thinking they had remote-controlled turrets in ww2, It's something i still find difficult to grasp
@simplsquamКүн бұрын
And you have the superfortress turrets that are basically computer controlled, ww2 saw some crazy aviation innovations Edit: just reached the point in the video where he mentions it
@TheArklyteКүн бұрын
We(humans) had remote controlled turrets before WWI. Not on planes though, obviously 😅
@icaindianenКүн бұрын
The first cruise ”missile” was from WW1. Basically a remote controlled/pre-programmed kamikaze aircraft. Lots of weird surprisingly high tech stuff around a century ago.
@treyebillups8602Күн бұрын
By the end of the war American warships were able to have computers calculate firing solutions for their guns with the aid of radar, which allowed some of the battleships to get hits on Japanese ships at insane ranges even without visual contact. Given that these remote turrets are a couple of 50 cals and not 16 inch battleship guns it was probably a lot easier to make the remote turrets with ballistic computers for them
@5505danielКүн бұрын
Not only that: -drones -homing torpedoes
@Lykas_mittsКүн бұрын
No doubt everyone will be flooding you with this comment, but the P-61's turret actually defaults forward facing not rear facing. Which makes it bad if you're being intercepted from the rear.
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
Dang, I got mixed up with doing the voice over 😭
@teodor9975Күн бұрын
the Bottom turret on the G8N simply uses a reflective gunsight. the crew sits above and will have to move the turret himself.
@Spartan-ir4zfКүн бұрын
The B-17 with the remote ball turret control was the glass bubble right behind the turret.
@phloppyphish4352Күн бұрын
2:09 I forgot there I heard it from, but I believe the pilot could lock the turret forward, basically giving the pilot 4 extra forward facing .50's on top of the 20mm cannons. Sadly this feature is not in War Thunder :(
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
Yeah people have been asking for that feature from when it was added to the game :(
@isseyITКүн бұрын
@@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsIf I remember correctly, they had written in the devblog that it would be able to do this in the game, but they never implemented it
@cuccareseКүн бұрын
@@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs , I thought they said something about it being unbalanced and refused to add it.
@Alextz_GrКүн бұрын
"... and a highly curious turret with four Browning 12.7 mm machine guns, capable of attacking targets all across its upper surfaces. Incidentally, this turret could also be locked to shoot forwards, so the pilot could control it as a frontal weapon. In War Thunder, we plan to introduce this function a little later in the form of a researched modification." from the devblog
@BrownFoxWarriorКүн бұрын
What I heard from those WWII vet interviews was that tge B-17E's remote turret used a mirror to aim, which made aiming difficult. That's why it was changed to a ball turret.
@bkam9794Күн бұрын
2:35 You are correct, the P-61 was designed to be a Heavy Night Fighter, using its radar to find, track, and destroy enemy aircraft in the dark.
@biomike01Күн бұрын
The fixed mgs were controlled by the pilot, they would have a trigger to fire them to try and scare off planes on their tail
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
What I'm confused by is the He-111 5 degrees traverse. What kinda of mechanism and sight was there to know where to aim the gun. Or was the 5 degrees just added by the WT Devs?
@me262omlettКүн бұрын
@@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs From what i know, even the He-111s remote Mg was controlled by the pilot. I'm also not sure if the He-111s Mg always had 5 degrees of traverse, so it's quite possible they added that to buff the plane.
@biomike01Күн бұрын
@@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs Added by the devs, the fixed guns had no movement at all and no sights I remember it being part of the devblog when they updated the 111's model
@_Funtime60Күн бұрын
The 1 degree traversal on the fixed guns isn't Gaijin being nice, it's needed in order to use them at ALL. Since in gunner mode you can move the aim point outside the field of fire, it'd be impossible to stay within a 0 degree area to actually fire the guns.
@robob4465Күн бұрын
Can't they just add a separate keybind, like for the tilted schrage musik cannons on german heavy fighters?
@xXE4GLEyEXxКүн бұрын
The He-111 rear gun I heard from someone that Hungary had one scout/recon he-111 fitted with that, it is supposed to be stationary, and only really used as scare tactics. The enemy pilots knew (Soviets) that behind the plane they are safe from the gunners, so this gun was stuck there to just fire at them and put them off from sitting behind the plane freely. I guess it moves similar to other stationary guns in game, some sort of a gameplay reason.
@loganrapp1Күн бұрын
im surprised the XA-38 grizzly was missed out, but either way it was neat to learn about the planes with these turrets, its easy to forget how many of them actually have remote controlled turrets.
@MBkufelКүн бұрын
4:40 The rear turret in the B-29 was also just optionally manned if I remember it correctly. It could be remote controlled.
@maverickf1426Күн бұрын
The black widdow still lacks the function of the turret beeing able to be fired from the Pilot in normal mode
@fangride3577Күн бұрын
I love the SM. 91 turret it’s gotten me plenty of kills on players
@CelicaDanКүн бұрын
the SM.91 is insanely good in general, but excellent on Sim. very stupid being able to go third person when no one else can, while having similar turn times to later fighters, and an excellent armament and ground pound capability.
@thelonious2213Күн бұрын
The S.M.91 and S.M.92 have different turret guns if I recall correctly. The S.M.91 has the 20 mm MG-151, while the S.M.92 has a 12.7 mm Breda SAFAT HMG. Gotta love the turrets honestly!
@samuelloomis9714Күн бұрын
12:14 I'd say that one isn't remote controlled because of how the controls are configured. It's just offset with some beams that you see move with the gun. To me, it's a matter of how the gunner controls it. Many of the guns may be controlled via linkages, and for those, I believe it would be better to call them indirectly controlled.
@RedTail1-1Күн бұрын
Those "beams" are the cables and pulleys for control surfaces.
@samuelloomis971423 сағат бұрын
@RedTail1-1 I didn't know what to call them, and the ones I was observing looked fairly thick and ridged... if those are even the right descriptors.
@remkirkthegamer1157Күн бұрын
4:33 You missed the XA-38 Grizzly, which has a similar turret layout to the A-26B
@Leonidas1210vcКүн бұрын
10:26 be-6 looks dope as hell
@flanfre_skarlett20 сағат бұрын
5:37 The gunner sits above the turret and aims downwards or something like that, kind of like most down-facing machinr guns except its a turret
@nihil2157Күн бұрын
iirc pe-3 mgs are controlled by pilot and could be replaced to flamethrower or a parachuted anti-air mine launcher
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
I think there was also a German Do-17 that had a flame thrower in the tail
@gheetza14Күн бұрын
@@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs yes
@lithobreak3812Күн бұрын
Anti air mines? Damn
@simplsquamКүн бұрын
12:10 On the B29 you can see a flat glass pannel on the bomb sight due to the curved glass causing distortion. That same distortion may be the reason why its not curved glass but thats just my theory
@jussi8111Күн бұрын
bro forgot the premium ki-21 butt gun
@yamatokurusaki5790Күн бұрын
Was about say that
@lapajgoo4572Күн бұрын
justice for ki-21
@liamboyle9199Күн бұрын
Tell you what, if you haven't seen a P-61 in person... its freaking narrower than you think😂 Also, the SM91 has an MG151, and the SM92 has a 12.7mm for turret guns.
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
I still feel bad for that mistake in the opening with the Sm91 and Sm92. I think I got most things right other than missing one American plane.
@matchc0635Күн бұрын
I like these fixed pointed behind guns like if they gonna ever be useful in real
@lukeskywalket289423 сағат бұрын
A few fun facts about the turrets on the P-61 & B-29: on the P-61, the turret could be locked in a forward-facing position and used as a fixed gun mount. And on the B-29, part of the remote turret control included a system that would allow a single gunner to slave multiple turrets to their controls, allowing, say, a waist gunner to control both the upper and lower rear remote turrets simultaneously.
@viperz3r016Күн бұрын
2:20 in Reading, Pennsylvania, there is a P-61 "Moonbeam Lady" being restored to flying condition.
@reapersteelwolf4327Күн бұрын
the B17 remote turret worked with the gunner in a belly laying position facing through the plexi glass done behind the turret, it was a pain to use from what i heard, so the ball was to replace it as it was more comfortable and practical then that.
@ChrinikКүн бұрын
I think the idea behind putting fixed MGs firing backwards in the engine cowling was to make it more problematic for a guy on straight six to go for your engines, as was often done.
@JLS-ti3lbКүн бұрын
Bro forgot the amazing XA-38 real sad hours
@bkam9794Күн бұрын
Can't edit my other comment to include this, but (3:30) you are again largely correct. While I don't know about the remote turret on the B-17E, the nose turret on the B-17G was added due to testing with the YB-40 gunship, which was an attempt to create a bomber-escort B-17. To make a long story short, from the YB-40 tests, they found that a nose-turret actually boosted the head-on protection for the B-17, this is also why later B-24's had nose-turret added, and it is also why the later B-29's added a second pair of .50 cal's to their forward dorsal turret.
@stefanpunktde8398Күн бұрын
7:00 in fact this fixed machine gun was used in the earlier He 111 and other german bomber planes. Controlled by the pilot for a kind of surperessing fire. Don't know how usefull it was...somewhere between porly and crappy..?
@Epsilon-M4720 сағат бұрын
The B29 was really sci-fi for the time period and the cost was ludicrous
@dylanbartlett5509Күн бұрын
I love the J1n1 people almost never expect that much rear firepower
@jage1559Күн бұрын
1:22 BV 238 has turrets way out on the wings. Or did you just mean remote controlled ones?
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
I ment just remote turrets. The Bv-238 does have the furthest turrets from the fuselage like you said :)
@flanfre_skarlett20 сағат бұрын
5:08 >Not that useful I clear entire lobbies with that gun, while using my own plane as tail-bait. The quad machine guns are VERY useful
@空飛ぶネコさんКүн бұрын
Ju388 "don't leave me! It's my only chance to get noticed!"
@kevincho118721 сағат бұрын
To add, the p61 was designed to be a might fighter. As such I believe the second guy in the cockpit is a radar operator
@CobraDBlade18 сағат бұрын
12:08 If you look carefully through the glass you can see that Gaijin modeled the controls for the guns rotating around as the guns move (but the gunner stays perfectly still because animation is hard). They look like they are basically just trigger extensions connected fairly directly to the guns themselves, with an aiming reticle suspended between them. It's possible to argue that this isn't a true remote turret in that sense, but if you're not directly behind and aiming down the guns it's not outrageous to argue that it's remote either. This really is a big fat grey area.
@thegeneralissimo470Күн бұрын
5:30. Badger jumpscare.
@TigerOwOКүн бұрын
Wish we have B52 variants in the game so we can have a remote controlled M61 Vulcan. (H variant)
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
That would be incredibly based
@blockstacker5614Күн бұрын
Radar guided Vulcan
@mrActionhouseКүн бұрын
Yes! iv been looking forward to remote turrets!
@Dominator4794Күн бұрын
The idea for the video: All early radars(Up to rank V)
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
I've got a few more ideas but dang I didn't think about a dedicated radar video. There quite a lot of planes with radar that you wouldn't expect. I'll note your idea down :D
@Dominator4794Күн бұрын
@@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs 🤟
@troygroomes104Күн бұрын
Correction. P-61's gun turret controller is in the back seat only. Front seats are the pilot * radar intercept officer
@216SuzanКүн бұрын
Will say the Lincoln’s turret is almost similar to the tail of the B-17 where the guns are offset from the gunner
@arcamean785Күн бұрын
I miss flying my B-17s in War Thunder but I swear the wing models have gotten worse and it feels like so much easier to rip them... well that or getting rammed because "omg a bomber I hate it" :p
@legoeasycompanyКүн бұрын
20mm "machine gun"? Uhhh where do you start calling things cannons then
@NBrixHКүн бұрын
usually at 15mm, so yeah. But guess it is still a machine ''gun'', but machine cannon probably would've been more accurate
@FirstDaggerКүн бұрын
@@NBrixH Machine cannon isn't really used as a word, those are called usually called autocannons.
@NBrixHКүн бұрын
@@FirstDagger true true, though maybe not in English, but in other languages it is
@KauppaKomissaariКүн бұрын
The ball turret was a simplification because if i remember they needed copper for submarines and well easier to make
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
Oh that's interesting
@KauppaKomissaariКүн бұрын
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs they needed more planes ball is easy to make
@BasicallybalticКүн бұрын
Flying a Japanese plane at night in 1945 knowing the P-61 could be lurking anywhere must have been terrifying. Also imagine Germany held out longer, and the B-29 wave that would have been turning the nation back to the stone age. Not to mention the B-36 and how untouchable it was and would have been at its time of introduction.
@spyczechКүн бұрын
I'd rather not imagine all that horrible outcomes of the war
@bennettcrozier34420 сағат бұрын
The glass ball turrets that look extra small used by the japanese might just be their version of us using 5’6 crewman in our turrets. Imagine. 4’11 crewman in a little ball turret, or only putting his torso in or something.
@michaelusswisconsin6002Күн бұрын
The P-61 Black Widow is a night fighter. The third crew member is the radar operator.
@Haaton-of-the-BasementКүн бұрын
7:19 the bane of all AirSB players. Straight up cheats on that bad girl.
@MauscmkwkКүн бұрын
2:19 looks like an arc 170 from Star Wars
@timthndr2996Күн бұрын
Not sure if you left it out intentionally, but the XA-38 has the same turrets that the A26B has but with a split tail
@Train115Күн бұрын
No XA-38? I mean it is very similar to the A-26, but the rear turret is in a different spot and the tail is split.
@Lajos_KelemenКүн бұрын
The Superfortress had a computer that calculated for you?!
@FabianDialer-vw1zkКүн бұрын
The lincoln one is not remote controled. He directly turns the gun with his movements by turning left and right. Remote controled for me would mean his input would have to be indirectly, through cabbles or something symiliar and not through direct contact with fixed parts on the gun.
@MeelixКүн бұрын
Ju288 my beloved (it's getting buffed a lot this patch)
@DisinformationAgentКүн бұрын
The SM.91s sci-fi turret is extremely good, I don't know what you're doing to not get kills with it.
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
It's a cool design but compared to some of the other turrets that can spin 360 and elevate 85 degrees. It's firing angles are aren't as good. It's not bad when compared to the fixed guns
@목화별Күн бұрын
00:30 just booster..
@rubendepuben8386Күн бұрын
yo what's the background song at 03:05, i haven't heard it in a very long time and gives me nostalgic feelings.
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
It's from the Grand Budapest Hotle sound track.
@rubendepuben8386Күн бұрын
@@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs Thanks, the reason it probably gave me nostalgic feeling is because i watched your vids years ago about tanks and other vehicles.
@Caktusdud.Күн бұрын
The lincon doesn't have a remote control turret, the one you showed, when it fired the muzzle flashes lit up this like pivot handle thing that is attached to the guns, extending down to the gunner.
@groundon83Күн бұрын
3:43 im pretty sure the chin gun was ment for japanese pilots as they were more widley know to exploit the weekness at the front
@Maverick-gg2doКүн бұрын
The chin turret comes from the experimental B-17 gunship variant, the YB-40 that flew over Europe. It was a gunship that carried no bombs but had significantly increased defensive gun armament. It was discontinued, but the features from it that were considered effective were simply distributed to the rest of the fleet by integrating them to the B-17G The chin turret specifically was necessary as the earlier B-17s had a significant lack of firepower forward that was abused by both Japanese and German pilots. Towards the end of the war, a head-on attack became the most common intercept profile for the Germans because it minimized their exposure to defensive gunfire and maximized the vulnerable areas of the plane (the engines and the cockpit)
@Mystic-MidnightКүн бұрын
I just got bad piggies'd by Iron :c
@Billy-I-Am-NotКүн бұрын
did you overlay the soundtrack from the Grand Budapest Hotel into the background?
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
Yep :)
@Billy-I-Am-NotКүн бұрын
@@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs Nice, love that film and its music
@andrewg3912Күн бұрын
Forgot the XA-38 dmh
@AltonNelson-kr1qu15 сағат бұрын
So i see you have the russian bagder emblem
@Erden99Күн бұрын
Iron... you can't start the vid by incorrectly claiming that the SM92 has the same tail gun as the SM91. It has a .50 cal, the 91 has a 20mm.
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
I know I'm so sorry, I got most things right but start of on the wrong foot 😭
@Erden99Күн бұрын
@@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs All right then xD I'm just a particular fan of the SM91 rear turret.
@MichalKolacКүн бұрын
Some turrets used mirrors i think.
@AliceAshhide3319 сағат бұрын
This guy literally did plane review to Bad Piggies music 💀
@jessejan0723 сағат бұрын
What is the song called that starts playing at 03:00?? If been looking for it for ages…
@ndfgaming6824Күн бұрын
now if only ai gunners did their job, idk if thats even a feature still in the game cuz i havent had a gunner shoot by themselves in years
@polygondwanaland8390Күн бұрын
Am I missing a trick or did you get the P-61C exactly backwards? The turret defaults forward and that's annoying because you've already got four 20mm forward. I'd much prefer it default rear. Is this a setting you can change?
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
Yeah got my directions mixed up for some reason 🥲
@lightdragon312720 сағат бұрын
Make every turret plane that's not a bomber
@cccc28516 сағат бұрын
Sm91 has the best turret, idk how u dont find it useful
@Rose_Butterfly98Күн бұрын
U missed the xa38 i think but it's practically the same as the a26
@samadams2203Күн бұрын
Cool.
@Spearmaster-and-sunsКүн бұрын
I hate that can't clam most creator items because I'm on console, pain
@NBrixHКүн бұрын
Where's the XA-38?
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
Your right I missed it 😭 But thank you for telling me
@NBrixHКүн бұрын
@@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs One of my favorite planes 😔
@RedTail1-1Күн бұрын
Eh woah plane
@angelcasillas3852Күн бұрын
Since when can the A-26 carry cannons?
@gumbie6959Күн бұрын
Ha brother how about a New Decal been waiting awhile now, you missing out on some revenue
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
I don't want to renew the decal, I do enjoy the original Baroness design. If I change the decal, people can't get the original version anymore 😭
@Dominator4794Күн бұрын
9:23 (⊙‿⊙)
@MichalKolacКүн бұрын
False info the sm 91 and sm 92 dont have the same gun
@Floris_VIКүн бұрын
does the game really look this bad close up or are you playing on ulq?
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
Some modles are very old, like the Pe-3 and He-111. I'm running the biggest size version of the game with all the graphics sliders maxed out. The game doesn't look to good through the replyer with close ups.
@treeshakertucker5840Күн бұрын
Anyone know what the music is from?
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
1st stone is the theme from Bad Piggies. 2nd Song is also the theme from the Grand Budapest Hotle
@TheEpicNoobКүн бұрын
Bad piggies music?
@franklinpresident4990Күн бұрын
isint that anime girl design by angelo's world?
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
Yes, I asked Angelo to design my WT Decal :D The Red Baroness, I based her design on the JG400 decal which itself is based on The Baron Munchausen cannonball ride
@Cross242Күн бұрын
Ki 21 I hei?
@jmirsp4zКүн бұрын
ju-388?
@J_v7101Күн бұрын
Shackleton?
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
Which weapon on it?
@J_v7101Күн бұрын
IL 28?
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigsКүн бұрын
I mentioned the rear gun when bring up Be-6. I don't quite think it's remote enough. It's a cool weapon system but not really remote.