Evolutionists Do NOT Want You to See This Video About the Big Bang

Evolutionists will not want you to see this video! In this episode of Off The Cuff, Bodie Hodge and Rob Webb discuss whether or not it’s possible for God to have used evolution when creating the universe, and if we can trust secular scientists.
========
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (Christianity-defending) ministry dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ effectively.
On our KZbin channel, you’ll find answers to your most pressing questions about key issues like creation, evolution, science, the age of the earth, and social issues. We desire to train believers to develop a worldview based on the Bible and expose the bankruptcy of evolutionary ideas and their implications.
You’ll hear from top teachers such as Ken Ham, Bryan Osborne, Dr. Georgia Purdom, Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, Tim Chaffey, Bodie Hodge, Dr. Gabriela Haynes, Dr. Terry Mortenson, and more.
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenesis.org/give

[@ahh-2-ahh]

Man science is always changing.... God's truth is always the constant & never changes!

[@johnl4933]

You don't trust science or scientific research?

[@toldyouso5588]

Choosing the right science is like choosing the right whisky, some are done right while others will rot your gut and drive you blind.

[@johnl4933]

@@toldyouso5588 Do you have any scientific background? Exactly how do you judge which fields of science to trust? Through your "feeling", "personal belief"?

[@toldyouso5588]

I have some, and in that technical field, the Bible even in the OT has shown to me provable laws of true science beyond the realm of speculation that was realized only in the past 5 centuries. That accuracy amazed me, that the bible could be so scientifically ahead of it's time. But before I tell you about it, you tell me your science and athiestic background.

[@johnl4933]

@@toldyouso5588 Currently studying quantum optics. My atheistic background? Was baptized as a child, went to church, asked questions and received no good answers. Read the Bible and found it abhorrent. The only bit of science I could find is the water cycle ... and all that takes is someone to be observant. What about all the things that can be shown to be complete nonsense? Do you just dismiss those as "miracles?" You can't have it both ways you know.

[@mechengineer-sv2ei]

I just can't help but think about how most all Christian churches sit empty for 5 or 6 days a week while sending theor kids to these public schools who preach against God 5 days a week. Churches need to step it up and stop sitting in the background.

[@joshuakohlmann9731]

Please stop helping to spread the lie that schools are "preaching against God". We don't preach at all. That's for vicars, not teachers. And we don't teach against God, we just don't drag him into arenas where he doesn't belong, like science lessons.

[@toldyouso5588]

The schools preach evil'otion. Teaching children to identify as cats and dogs that need to be spayed or neutered.

[@Klaatu731]

@@joshuakohlmann9731 That’s the problem. Look up the teenage birth rate and drop out rate from the time prayer was banned. I think you mean well, but you are fundamentally flawed in your logic. If you would like to have a rational conversation without getting angry? I’m game.

[@joshuakohlmann9731]

@@Klaatu731 Perfectly happy to!

[@joshuakohlmann9731]

@@Klaatu731 I'll kick off, if you like. I suspect your argument might be a case of _post hoc, ergo propter hoc._ The drop out and teenage birth rate may well have increased after prayer was banned in schools, but we can't automatically conclude that that was the cause. It might have been something else. Or it could be a coincidence. Or a third factor may have simultaneously influenced the birth rate, the drop out rate and the dropping of school prayer. Do you have any evidence that specifically connects the phenomena you referred to with the outlawing of prayer in schools?

[@myfakeguuglaccount8307]

After watching a BBC documentary on the theory's problems, I'm convinced they're making things up as they go along.

[@Calatriste54]

😂😅😃

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Absolutely and that is what they like to do. Come up with theoretical possibilities, add on a few mathematical equations and say they've "figured it all out." Until the next time they realize they don't. 🤔🙏✝️

[@zerosteel0123]

Astronomers have a tendency to do that. "We have [this] figured out." Next thing you know, they don't. They are ever learning but unable to come to the knowledge of the truth. Fools, every last one of them.

[@zerosteel0123]

​@@LordMathiousscience "acknowledges their limits?" Only when they are publicly made a fool of like just happened with the JWST. You're only sorry you got caught. 😂

[@zerosteel0123]

​@@LordMathious you guys got a little too arrogant for your own good, this time. The JWST is the best favor creationists could have ever gotten from you guys. It's like an early Christmas. Thank you.

[@smithsmithington]

Answers in Genesis needs to put out an advanced series of videos where they really dig into this. I understand they are trying to simplify these things to a "101" level, but brushing past the technical stuff to make it more palatable makes them sound like they don't know what they're talking about. Also, those of us who do want them to dig into these things deserve to know the more advanced things they are brushing past. It's obvious their speakers know a lot more and I would love to hear it. Make a separate "advanced" series please!

[@Thisisnotmyrealname8]

They have more technical papers on their website.

[@tjsays8916]

​@@Thisisnotmyrealname8that's true! If someone is a scientist or interested in the technical stuff they can go to the website.

[@tjsays8916]

@@LordMathious according to you but you're an atheist so we don't expect you to believe anything we say. Lol

[@BBCTopgearfan]

​@LordMathious your statment is factually false. 😊

[@smithsmithington]

@@Thisisnotmyrealname8 Their website is not easy to navigate, links are dead, reference old research articles, or they brush past the deeper research the same way they do in these videos. I am a Christian so, I'm not coming at this from a "prove it" stand point. I am saying it would benefit them, their audience, and the world if they took the time to make more advanced videos that dive deeper into the science of these topics. Dumbing things down is a big reason why people don't take Christians seriously. Also, telling people to "look it up" or "it's on the website" is irrelevant to what I suggested... to make videos.

[@surrenderdaily333]

Over the course of my lifetime I espoused every religion and new scientific theory including the "theistic evolution". I was all over the place trying to incorporate every "truth" I could find to create my own religion of all the truths, because I never felt like anyone had ALL the truth, but I somehow felt that ALL of it was out there. After 40 years of that idolatrous apostasy I finally came back to God and His Word as my Only Authority. I thank God and praise Him for that futile and exhausting search for the truth when I had it from the age of 11-13 and for bringing me back home!

[@jonatand2045]

That's the problems. Feelings but not evidence. You wanted all answers and went to the bible because it tells you thay it has answers. None proven of course.

[@surrenderdaily333]

@@jonatand2045 You're showing your ignorance if you think there's no proof - there are mountains of evidence, all scientific, that back up the Biblical accounts. I suggest you start studying. I've been accumulating it for 9 years.

[@jonatand2045]

@@surrenderdaily333 Ok, show your proof of that magical global flood and you get a nobel prize. It even has 8 humans surviving that would get extinct due to incest.

[@trulyso734]

Good testimony

[@jonatand2045]

@@trulyso734 Yet it changes nothing in the greater discussion of science and reason vs religion.

[@Born_again1984]

I had a secular physicist as a patient, got on the topic of science and he dropped the latest update “the scientific community is rethinking the Big Bang theory origin” due to quantum physics apparently it’s paused the thinking of how things have came about.

[@monicanixon5140]

😊

[@zerosteel0123]

Yes it's in big trouble!

[@AnnemieM]

not due to quantum physics, due to observation from the James Webb.

[@johnl4933]

That's the strength of the scientific method.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​@@johnl4933so is elaboration and guesswork. Apparently that goes a long way in the big bang theory (that is allegedly fact). 🤔🙏✝️

[@thecrew777]

My dad was a junior high school science teacher. He found an article and gave it to me that started out "In the beginning God said let there be light, and POW! There was this big explosion which shows you the danger of playing with matches." 🙄 That didn't help. I read Genesis as fact, because GOD, who made it all, cannot lie. Therefore it is true. End of story!

[@tone9358]

Prove god wrote the bible, & not man. Prove that man did not rewrite the bible with lies as it was passed down. You need these 2 issues proven before you can take the bible at face value.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

@@tone9358 or maybe you just need a humble heart. Some people won't believe no matter what you tell them. If your heart doesn't change, nothing will.

[@garrywilliams4449]

​@@tone9358man wrote the Bible as God gave them the words. The Bible is Gods words. But I wonder how many words were changed in translation.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

@@garrywilliams4449 they've compared it to the Dead Sea Scrolls, my friend to 99% accuracy. We can trust what the bible says. 🙂🙏✝️

[@johnl4933]

@@newcreationinchrist1423 Prove it.

[@catmanbluz]

even Paul talks about the many different types of stars that God made with different strengths and sizes, yet all at the same time: “The sun has one kind of splendor, the moon another and the stars another; and star differs from star in splendor.” 1 Corinthians 15:41

[@jonatand2045]

Incredible, it says the obvious.

[@hozn]

Oh LORD, you are mind blowing. just by observing the things from a single day of your Creation. We fall on our face in reverence 😭

[@susannemedina7955]

When I was going to Sunday school I asked the question as a 9-year-old who loved dinosaurs, "Who came first, Adam and Eve or the dinosaurs? My question was not acknowledged and I sat down embarrassed. Later as a 13-year-old I asked a missionary the same question and got the same silent treatment. Later I found out that Christians did not even acknowledge that there ever were dinosaurs. I was confused especially after seeing a picture of a fully reconstructed brontosauruses bones in the Smithsonian institute. There are many puzzles in the Bible that we can entertain ourselves in trying to reconstruct from the original design. But the secret things belong to God. Perhaps He wants to leave room for pure faith. So I have my idea about creation and so do many others but it is not a point of dispute but more a game of discovery. I like to call myself a "mystery archaeologist" digging for hidden Truth. The real BA in science comes from God: Born Again. If the same Spirit that moved upon the face of the waters before the creation moves upon the face of your waters which you are principally made up of and creates a new being you will understand how God created the Heavens and the Earth.

[@sunflower2594]

I'm not an evolutionist and see the problems with evolution. However, there is some very good evidence that man has been around on this planet for far more than 6,000 years. I was raised creationist, 6 literal days/6,000 year old earth. Like you, when I began to question what I had been taught, I never got a good response. I eventually left Christianity. Now, I'm trying to come back, looking for good evidence. Not hard and fast answers, just some evidence. Crap like this video doesn't help.

[@BBCTopgearfan]

Dinosaurs walked the earth with man. There are thousands of human and Dino fossilized foot prints. Most are destroyed or hidden after discovery. Look up cryptozoology sometime and read up on the thunderbird sometime. In the late 1880s-1920s a pterodactyl was shot (look up tombstone thunderbird, and start slogging through all the tin foil hats and conspiratorial and cover up pages) the Smithsonian sent out a team, they took pictures and verified it as a real unknown animal and it was widely reported in the local papers, then it was hidden shortly afterwards. In the 1990s some Amazon explorers took some pictures of what appeared to be a brachiosaurus deep in the jungle. There are pictographs of dinosaurs in caves all over the world and carved into the stone of ancient cities.

[@BBCTopgearfan]

​@@sunflower2594I'm trying to find it, but there is a minor debate that some people in the early years of Jesus's life changed the ages of pre flood people to try and discredit Jesus's claim of decent and time. I can't find it and it's been a few years since I read it. But basically they were alot older then what our current translations say. So 12,000-25000 years for a total age of the earth and universe. However, even if it is exactly 6523 years old, that's still plenty of time for all of recored history.

[@Ballondorwinner]

belief in dinosaurs cannot coexist with christianity as it calls into question highly critical christian beliefs like the fact there was a time before humans

[@Svetka.A]

The behemoth (brontosaurus) is mentioned in Job 40:15-19

[@SkyfallenVT]

I just felt like I need to mention that evolution has nothing to do with the Big Bang. They are completely different concepts. ~Sky your friendly Atheist.

[@CaptainFantastic222]

I caught that too. Odd title

[@TxCen5432]

Science is the study of what God created.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

The problem is never the science but the interpretation of the science. Not only that but you have philosophical ideas from secular science that get intermingled with the science. Diluting it even further.

[@johnl4933]

Prove your god created everything.

[@Skylerrelyks93]

@@johnl4933prove everything came from nothing…

[@johnl4933]

@@Skylerrelyks93 Ah ... I see. The religious fallacious question. Could you please define "nothing?" Do you have any example of "nothing"?

[@raysearch-iu3fr]

Science is the study of what God created, using the human mind and the process of reason that GOD CREATED! We are NOT divine. The created cannot fully come to know the Creator. He tells us everything we need to know, equips us with the attributes we need to have to live WITHIN His creation. Faith and reverence should go hand-in-hand with scientific investigation.

[@bigsarge2085]

A deep dive documentary or series of videos into the technicalities and scientific & scriptural definitions would be fantastic.

[@LindseyDisney]

How much you want to bet that the 2 guys in this video secretly believe the earth is the center of the universe?

[@betsieswartz]

A deep dive into how absolutely stupid the people running this channel would be awesome.

[@jimhughes1070]

They have existed on the internet for a long time! Hundreds and hundreds of hours... In every scientific discipline😂.... For those of us with short attention spans😂 Discovery Science has produced a bunch of 5 to 10 minutes clips! Lots of information! There's no actual gap between science and believe in the creator...

[@betsieswartz]

@@jimhughes1070 there is a massive gap between a fairy tale and actual truth.

[@jimhughes1070]

@@betsieswartz yes indeed!... We are agreed! 🤣🤣 While you're pondering that.... Ponder this... "Science".... Requires observation.... Theories are based on guesses about what you're looking at.... And the assumptions you make while you're looking.... Neither of those are science.... Phds are given to people... By their "friends".... And evidently neither require empirical evidence.... In other words... You have to adhere to the belief system that your "friends" like 🤣🤣🙏😍

[@scripturalmotivation]

i love off the cuff episodes. these two are awesome.

[@felipekennedy3135]

I have heard the pope say that GOD needs EVOLUTION to fulfill his CREATIVE work in the universe. However i believe in the Genisis explaination of Creation, which are facts.For Gods Words is the Absolute Truth, what He says Goes into my heart and stays there as TRUTH.

[@toldyouso5588]

I stopped believing in the pope after news of the Vatican bank mafia and pedo-priest scandals. As a teen I biked 10 miles to see where Pope John paul visited after he already left. When Pope Francis came to visit I didn't even turn on the TV. My faith nowadays is biblical based.

[@tjsays8916]

Amen

[@georg7120]

What does evolution to do with the big bang?

[@user-uq6el9sg6u]

God is almighty, omnipotent and loving. Our biggest problem and obstacle to the truth is our own pride and intellect. This is what separates us from Him. Fortunately, He sent His son to break this bondage and now the Holy Spirit testifies to the truth. It is our mission to pray that the Spirit captures these unfortunate humanistic, secular scientists. May it be so. Amen

[@betsieswartz]

Source?

[@punchbuggylime]

Dear AiG... Your thumbnails about the video's content are always more appreciated than the clickbait noise.

[@hozn]

Yoo the edits went crazy 😂 supa hot fire 🔥 back from my high school days lol

[@joanolear3579]

Thank you Godly scientists for explaining man’s false narrative about the big bang theory.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​@@LordMathiousPhD's say otherwise, Mathious. I don't think that is up for debate nor is your opinion going to change that fact. 😉✝️🙏

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

@@ji8044 what's false? 🙂 Please tell me.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​​@@ji8044 I'm sure many of them before becoming mature Christians used to believe in evolution (like most people do). I'm certain that their research led them to believe differently. If anybody took a snapshot of our past life, I'm sure there would be things that we wouldn't be proud of. That is assuming that everything you're saying is true to begin with and no offense, but I'm not too sure if I even believe what you're saying. 🙂🙏✝️ God bless

[@toldyouso5588]

God was the first scientist. Science is just the study of God's creation.

[@johnl4933]

@@ji8044 There's a lot of easy money to be made by pulling the wool over creationists eyes. Multi-billion dollar industry religion is.

[@RoadBloc85]

The scientific community (cult) has wasted immeasurable amounts of human life and resources over centuries trying to disprove the existence of The Most High…they’ll always fail at this! He is the essence of life itself and no scientific discovery can ever challenge His power…it only further reveals it! All praise to The Most High 🙏🏾

[@globalcoupledances]

What is "The Most High'"? How do you define "High"?

[@RoadBloc85]

@@globalcoupledances The Most High is also known as God, or Yahuah, I’ve heard some call Him Yahweh, He’s The One True God, not trying to trick anybody here…Most High is how many commonly refer to Him

[@globalcoupledances]

@@RoadBloc85 But in weighless situation where is high and where is low? Depends on where something falls to. But they don't fall in a weighless situation

[@toldyouso5588]

@@globalcoupledances If you were standing anywhere on the earth or a single point in the universe. In any orientation 360 degrees in your sphere of space, above you, below you, in front and behind you, in any direction/degrees totally around is the Most High. If you are standing on the north pole or south pole, on any compass point of the meridian, above you is the Most High. God omnipresent is everywhere to the farthest reaches of the univere and extent of reality.

[@globalcoupledances]

@toldyouso5588 - "If you are standing on the north pole or south pole" There is gravity. But without gravity? No High or Most High

[@gordo191]

Happy and Blessed Sabbath everyone !!

[@freshbakedclips4659]

Happy Sabbath

[@Svetka.A]

Blessed Sabbath to you 🙏

[@savedbyjesus2145]

👍 good video!!

[@philipreaves2133]

Excellent!!!!! God Bless both of you

[@barbaltman6198]

Thank you. What does God say ... that is what counts.

[@betsieswartz]

Have you ever heard god speak?

[@chrisbaker2903]

@@betsieswartz Not personally but thousands of eyewitnesses say that he lived and that the bible is the truth.

[@alphabeta1337]

There never was a big bang

[@Redeemed.of.YHVH.thru.Christ]

Yes there was. God said, “Let there be”, and BANG! It was. 💯 YHVH spoke everything into existence, and He holds it all together by the Word of His power. Praise Him!

[@iancampbell2295]

There absolutely was ,if you want proof just look , its called the cosmic background radiation. You can see it. Plus , the waves from the initial expansion can still be detected today! Do you see that! There is no evidence of god except for a dusty old book!

[@clintpospichal6498]

Even before I was a Christian I never believed in evolution, but it was entertaining to make movies, I always knew it was fictional

[@stevepierce6467]

I watched "The Ten Commandments" starring God himself (Charlton Heston) and I knew that was fiction, but still very entertaining.

[@zerosteel0123]

Same. Evolution, big bang.......it's all modern day mythology.

[@lewis726]

@@zerosteel0123how?

[@jalengaskin8450]

As a non-Christian, how did you come to that conclusion?

[@clintpospichal6498]

@@jalengaskin8450 just didn't make since to me, as I said, it just seemed to fake, to much fiction

[@kruton9000]

Thank you! Nice video. God bless you!

[@edbutzwiggle4227]

Amen!!!!

[@tech4u2022]

What can i say ? God is allmighty and it's there for all to see who raise their heads and look up to the heavens...

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

Yeah but the problem is that Christians have their heads so far up their own @** that they can't think clearly

[@mikesamuel9175]

Thank YAHWEH for BRAVE and INTELLIGENT Christian Apologists like these two GENTLEMEN!!! HalleluYAH🙏🙏🙏

[@betsieswartz]

These men are very far from intelligent

[@jamo2144]

I’m a physics student who has researched the Big Bang extensively, and these “problems” they talk about are not considered real problems by many physicists, for instance Sabine Hossenfelder. The fact is the Big Bang theory only suggests the universe is *expanding*, not anything about how it started. This has tremendous evidence backing it. The lack of monopoles and the antimatter could be explained by new physics we don’t know or maybe the universe just didn’t have them initially. Physics doesn’t tell us anything about the start of the universe, just what happened afterwards. So it’s very plausible that God just chose the initial conditions to be such that there were no monopoles or antimatter, nothing in physics prevents that. AMA about the physics.

[@alextowers3564]

Thank you! These two goons have no clue, and yet judging by the comments so many people trust them (or I guess have faith in them) to be unwaveringly accurate. Now that I've typed that, I'm starting to see how creationists might be willing to think like that...

[@ChicagoJimmy420]

I heard a man Describe God as This way years ago. He said: In order to easily understand how God Can Be Outside The Realm of Time and Space. Picture An Ordinary Shoe Box , Except It Contains The Milky-Way Galaxy and many many more Galaxies. Now Picture this same shoe box on an upper shelve in a Closet. Then he said: That's God's Closet That Has The Shoebox in it, And that's the Shoebox that has many many and many more Galaxies inside said Shoebox. Jimmy,

[@globalcoupledances]

There is no outside Time and Space. Because outside Time and Space = nowhere and never

[@ChicagoJimmy420]

@@globalcoupledances @jd712 Nope You're Wrong.

[@globalcoupledances]

I am not wasting my time with liars like you

[@TheDotransporter]

I been waiting for their input on this new discovery

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

You were waiting for these two to spew b.s.?

[@TheDotransporter]

I hear whatever makes sense, unlike flat earthers.

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

@@TheDotransporter I thought you were a flat earther

[@TheDotransporter]

@@--..-...-..-.--.... I thought you were a flat earther

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

@@TheDotransporter 🤯

[@carlaworden6566]

Love the background!!

[@kaylenehousego8929]

Appreciation and blessings from Sydney Australia .

[@redfaux74]

I take Gen ch 1 thru 3 literally.

[@betsieswartz]

You shouldn’t

[@redfaux74]

@@betsieswartz - If you're not familiar with the Word of God keep your trap shut. No one cares what some goon atheist believes. Atheists believe "nothing exploded" billions of years ago. And here we are with all this complexity?!? How about some scientific evidence for that? Something we can examine, test? Maybe you can tell me what mathematical formula, scientific method was used for the 13.778 billion years of the universe? Because 150 years ago it was 4 million. Then about 50 years later it was 400 billion. That's a big math "F". Maybe we can see the diff between each formula? Why each one was wrong and why 13.778 is correct? No? Because you atheists have more blind faith than any other of the top 10 religions in the world put together. You've never witnessed any evidence. None of it makes sense but you blindly swallow it. Go away troll. We don't have time for the mindless drivel of some low class faerie tale, religion of Naturalism. Get gone.... Away with you!

[@kaimagnus]

Edit: Please take just a moment to read this. To fully understand it and get it. It may be a little bit longer than just a post, but it's well worth it to take just a few moments to read the entire post. We have been getting so much wrong. We didn't understand things well when we first started science because we hadn't discovered much yet. So we got a lot of things wrong! And we are still basing most of our science on that stuff to this day! Built entire principals based on old fashioned ways of thinking that collected and accepted flawed information and led to misunderstanding! Something that has been revealed to many of us, I think, is that you can't trust science to even tell us what it has actually discovered or found evidence for! It has been tempted and corrupted to essentially sweep evidence off the table when nobody is looking. And never ever allow any news reports to be released to inform the public! It's all a situation where people that aren't always really very smart, but have had someone they know or are related to or something like that has helped them get a job as a scientist and they don't even have to be very smart to have the credentials for it. And that's the way the system wants it to be! So we are led by misguided and misunderstanding people to wrong conclusions! And those people suffer from pride just like most other people. So they want to be able to keep telling themselves how awesome and amazing and wonderful they are! They also want to keep the positions they have been given. So they will play the enemy's game whether they know it or not. And deep down they know they aren't qualified for the positions they have been given. They have been deceived, manipulated and misled like so many others! There is a big difference between intelligent and trainable! Heck, even apes are trainable to do sign language. They feel hunger, they move their hands like this and food happens! Intelligence can recognize a problem and actually figure out what questions to ask to solve the problem in the first place and then figure out how to answer those questions and then answer them! Like in school. They base more of your grade on doing your homework than test scores! Who cares if you were smart enough to learn and understand it as long as you obeyed! "Let's pass obedient kids to the next grade! So the future leaders of the people are more controllable!" So less intelligent kids get passed and are given good grades just because they turned in their homework that didn't take thinking, it just took repeating the answers! Trainable not intelligent! But these good grades get them into schools that get them into jobs as "scientists". They usually won't admit it because humanity isn't as advanced as it would like to think it is and just like our "primitive" ancestors we have these medicine men and shaman that tell us how everything works and why things happen so we aren't so afraid of it! So to keep them and the false gods pleased we started a tradition of putting our shaman or "scientists" into positions of power, authority, influence, admiration, comfort, wealth and decision making! Once they get put in these positions they don't ever want to leave or lose those positions! So they will tell us anything to keep those positions! People enjoy their sins so they don't want to have to believe that they will have to face the debt, burden and consequences of their favorite sins! Because they think if God is then that means they have to stop their favorite sins or they will have to face the debt, burden and consequences! So they would just rather God not exist! So knowing this those scientists will tell people whatever fits with no God so the people don't throw them out of their positions of power, authority, influence, admiration, comfort, wealth and decision making! And people don't realize this and fall for it. So you really just can't trust it. I promise you. God is! And it turns out it all does fit and if we knew how to it could actually be described! Think about this. Before we can say our equipment and devices used to determine the age of things can be trusted we have to calibrate them. We do this by taking something like a 1500 year old stone tablet with the date written on it that we are sure really is from that date and we test it. We keep testing and adjusting the equipment and devices until the test results say it is 1500 years old. Then we figure our equipment and devices are calibrated correctly. But the problem is we haven't been there or paying attention at all times during it's existence to know all the conditions everything has existed under! So what if things at one point perhaps gained and lost carbon at a different rate than it does now. What if that changed for some reason like 5000 years ago? Then the calibration of the equipment and devices would be no good for anything from farther back then 5000 years! Anything older than that would seem to be much older or younger than it actually is! It could be 6000 years old and the test results would say it's billions of years old! We just don't know! And because of calibration this applies to all methods of testing! So you can take that "we know for sure it's millions of years and billions of years" stuff and just throw it out the window! Because you don't! And can't! You can't say you know for sure and can't guarantee you are right! So let's shoot for something we can guarantee and know for sure! Something that has proven itself with 100% accuracy! The Word of God! And yes it's the only one! We need to stop approaching God from a scientific point of view and start approaching science from God's point of view! If we had been doing this all along we could be living in Star Trek The Next Generation level technology by now! Some of you are familiar with 11 Dimensions theory and String Theory. Well a Hebrew scholar and scribe studied Genesis and figured out there should be 11 Dimensions and he did this thousands of years ago just with The Word of God! We only just figured this stuff out doing it our way! Where would we be if we had been and were now doing it The Lord's way?! I mean what better to understand something than to consult the one who made it? Who better to help us understand science than the one who MADE science?! We have been getting so much wrong. Someday God will tell us all about it and we will actually be able to understand. Truly Believe! Hope this helps. I love you all!

[@lewis726]

I don’t think you know how radiometric dating works. Science is not the enemy if you actually go deep into it I think it proves god. The bible while useful and I think contains a lot of wisdom and truths was ultimately written by men. Whilst the laws of nature were made by god. Why would you limit gods greatness the say the earth is only 6000 years old. God is so great that he had a plan and for 13.8 billion years created the perfect conditions for us. What would you love more something you have right away or something that you patiently wait for for a long time until you finally get it. When you wait you love it so much more

[@alphaomegastables]

THANK YOU...for your LOVE of our CREATOR, GOD...your writing shows that sooo much..GOD continue to guide & protect/direct you & the Family!!

[@ngoctruongpaulnguyen6503]

Science is a framework. It's not constant and leaves itself open to be challenged. So one theory is true until proven false by a better one. I don't have an issue in believing in a creator god but what you are defining in your rant about school teaching how to obey is the dogma of religion. That's not to say it is right or wrong because society needs a moral code to avoid chaos but blind belief/faith is a description of religion, especially abrahamic religions.

[@RealHooksy]

Science let you post this comment 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@kaimagnus]

@@RealHooksy And God made science and made science possible! So ultimately God made me able to post that comment, and this one. Can you see how you have been deceived, manipulated and misled into replacing God with science? Don't let the enemy do that to you neighbor! I'll pray for you. Take care. Hope this helps. I love you all!

[@Steve-dk3md]

Awesome you guys, Bless you AIG crew!

[@betsieswartz]

Where is the awesome

[@brianpaul98]

I have to say in this video you gentleman we're so on point that I had to be careful I didn't get poked in the eye just watching it ;) Thank you for what you do and God bless

[@JungleJargon]

*Solution to the "Time Light Problem"* The reason why people often stumble over the *assumption* that light years in outer space equals the same measure of distance and passage of time on earth is because general relativity is not being taken into account. In general relativity, the local rate of time and the measure of distance depend on the amount of matter or mass in the vicinity. Locally, the rate of time and measure of distance doesn't change much inside of our galaxy. However, the distance in our line of sight between us and distant galaxies is extreme and running at a much faster rate of time as well as an expanded measure of distance outside our galaxy compared to where we are near Sagittarius A's Milky Way black hole (where our rate of time is much slower and our measure of distance is much more contracted). The same way the earth appears flat locally, our universe also appears to be flat locally. However, over great distances throughout the universe there are differing measures of distance and differing rates of time from black holes to the lagrange points between black holes where there is very little acceleration compared to our relatively flat contracted local frames of reference near Sagittarius A. When we observe other galaxies, we are effectively looking at vastly differing measures of time and distance relative to our local observations within the gravitational force of the mass of the Milky Way galaxy. This can lead to various observed phenomena as we look into outer space such as redshift, superluminal motion and the apparent faster motion of the outer spiral arms of galaxies. It's not the same as our flat observations of cats and dogs locally here on earth where we don't observe differing measures of distance and time. So the supposed expansion of the universe, imaginary inflatons, invisible dark matter and dark energy or vacuum energy are *not* required to explain the observed redshift of light from distant galaxies or the faster than expected motion of the outer spiral arms of galaxies. As predicted by general relativity, the expanded space between galaxies due to the absence of matter in our line of sight where much less acceleration can explain the observed redshift without the need for a nonsensical universe expanding into oblivion for no apparent reason and it explains the faster than expected motion of structures and objects the farther it is from supermassive black holes. It turns out that the vacuum energy of space is due to the frame dragging of black holes that are growing from gobbling up spacetime regardless of the amount of matter being consumed. Recent findings of a team of scientists have found that dark energy or vacuum energy is associated with supermassive black holes that are all growing in size, as opposed to an ever expanding universe. It turns out that light is blue shifted going into a gravitational well so the converse is true of being redshifted traveling great distances outside of gravitational wells. Supermassive black holes are the most powerful forces in the universe with far reaching effects of gravity and vacuum energy. The problem and solution is that between galaxies, all of the galaxies all around are all together pulling and drawing in spacetime as well as exerting equal gravitational forces on empty space. This is the reason there is very little acceleration between galaxies and where there is expanded distance and a faster rate of time. The clocks are running faster outside of galaxies and the measuring sticks are larger meaning things are actually less distant than they appear. The more gravity drops off outside of the galaxy and in between galaxies, the more distance will be expanded and the faster the rate of time will be. As predicted by general relativity, the expanded space between galaxies due to the absence of matter in our line of sight where there is less acceleration explains the observed redshift without the need for a nonsensical universe expanding into oblivion for no apparent reason at all. The differing rates of time and differing measures of distance also explain *how* a day is the same as a thousand years and a thousand years is the same as a day, at the same time in the same universe. 13.8 billion years is the same as 6,000 years and 6,000 years is the same as 13.8 billion years *within the same created universe!*

[@patsucher7781]

I hate to tell you but there is no such thing as a black hole. Simply explained those are constants (masses) added to the gravity based equation to balance the equation that is wrong. Complete fiction to force their equations that don't work to appear to work. They will keep adding black holes as gravity theory works well in our solar system, but not in universal distances. Gravity is the weakest force, but yet their model is based upon it and their model ignores electro-magnetic forces that are abundant in the universe, solar system, and even our world. General Relativity theory is bunk. Einstein was a plagiarizer and hack. Look for scientist discarded back then. Birkeland is one. Thunderbolts Project....

[@jalengaskin8450]

In other words, this explains how the creation can be “young” while being perceived as being “old” or whichever order makes more sense

[@JungleJargon]

@@patsucher7781 They don’t know what’s in a black hole. They just know that light doesn’t escape unless it’s forced out and they know that they increase in size. The black holes do hold the stars in orbit

[@JungleJargon]

@@jalengaskin8450 Yes it’s actually old and young at the same time.

[@jalengaskin8450]

@@JungleJargon that’s cool

[@theknighttemplar8177]

The LORD, who stretches out the heavens, who lays the foundation of the earth. Zechariah 12:1❤️

[@betsieswartz]

Nah bro that’s gravity

[@theknighttemplar8177]

@@betsieswartz what caused the purpose of gravity?

[@betsieswartz]

@@theknighttemplar8177 a large enough object to attract other objects to it

[@MrRodro3000]

Great job guys, keep up the good work.👊🏿💯‼️ I also love how at the end of every session you guys always conclude with the need of man for a Savior because without Jesus Christ our Lord 😪 nothing else matters. Amen ✝️

[@betsieswartz]

This is not good work

[@olafseglem3366]

The latest discoveries has disproved the big bang theory.

[@klouis1886]

If you add the supernatural it is no longer science

[@billparrish4385]

If the Great Cosmic Egg (a.k.a. 'quantum singularity') cannot be defined by *_known natural laws_* and processes, either with respect to its origin, or the reason why it exploded versus continuing on as it was... Then is The Egg not, by definition, supernatural? If not, why not?

[@klouis1886]

@billparrish4385 I believe it can be explained as a natural process, we just haven't defined it yet. We are getting closer to finding a unifying process for the very small and the very big and I believe we will. I see no reason why the supernatural has to be involved

[@Creationism-is-pseudoscience]

This is true. Science is the study of the natural world exclusively. Anybody who tells you differently are preaching pseudoscience to you.

[@billparrish4385]

@@klouis1886 The Latin word for 'I believe' is 'credo'. You just involved the supernatural by saying, "I believe." You went beyong the observed (i.e., 'science') and stated a belief in natural processes as holding the answers, even though we don't know what those answers will be. It's circular reasoning to say, "Natural law as an explanation for origins is scientific, because it's not dependent on beliefs, but fact," and then in an absence of facts, state it as a belief anyway. Natural law is science because it is? The supernatural is not science because it is not? Circular! What if every natural explanation is disproven, leaving only the supernatural? That still admittedly doesn't prove the supernatural, it merely leaves it as the best option in light of the facts. What facts? How about biogenesis, which says life originates only from life, long recognized as scientific fact since the time of Pasteur. But evolutionists rely on its opposite, abiogenesis, life from non-living matter, or else they don't have all our little progenitors crawling from the ooze of that primordial soup millions of years ago. How can a process observed nowhere (except in a lab, and those experiments all starting with life-originated substances) be called 'scientific'? The short answer is it cannot. From the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, to biogenesis, to the lack of transitional forms in the fossil record, and all going back to that faith in that Great Cosmic Egg, faith in what has not 'yet' been seen drives it all. Evolution is, quite simply, a religion, just as much as its creationism counterpart. If it weren't for 'the scientific community' bullying each other to believe it, or else watch your funding and your standing dry up before your eyes, it would have been discredited long ago.

[@toldyouso5588]

Science fiction is no better substitute either.

[@stoamnyfarms]

If you change the long time frame (billions of years) to one day like God said, creating the entire universe from nothing sounds like God's works to me. I believe that's why evolutionists don't like to talk about the big bang as much lately.

[@tone9358]

What?

[@stoamnyfarms]

@@tone9358 I'm sorry. What part was not clear?

[@stoamnyfarms]

@@ji8044 I'm not really sure what the sarcasm is for. If you don't agree with religion then why get on a religious channel and make comments?

[@globalcoupledances]

"evolutionists don't like to talk about the big bang" Because evolution is biology. The Big Bang is Cosmology. There is no origin of species nor natural selection seen in the Big Bang

[@stoamnyfarms]

@@ji8044 what do you think the lie is? There is a lot of lies from the world. Maybe you just need to stop being so confrontational, take a step back, and open your eyes.

[@ralphreinert]

"The Bible doesn't change." Perhaps. Which Bible should we look at first. My personal favorite is the King James Version, but I know many people prefer the Revised Standard Version or the New International Version or the New Revised Standard Version. Which unchanging version is your personal choice?

[@spiritedqueen9564]

I love the memes thrown in between 😂

[@michalp79]

It is so hard to listen to. AiG simply lie to their followers, and it is so sad.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

00:20 why am I not surprised to see the false teacher William Lane Craig on that?

[@captanblue]

What was he false about?

[@dooglitas]

@@captanblue Lane Craig believes that evolution is true.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​@@captanbluewatch my video

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​@@dooglitasyes and he denies the Adam and Eve account re: original sin.

[@dooglitas]

@@newcreationinchrist1423 You are correct. I am not a fan of Lane Craig. I also believe he is a false teacher.

[@0animalproductworld558]

I always can't wait for your new videos Answer in Genesis

[@lisanicholls2706]

Thank you

[@SirtubalotTX]

Psalm 104:2 "The LORD wraps himself in light as with a garment; he STRETCHES out the heavens LIKE A TENT" ISAIAH 40:22 "It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in:" Not saying these verses lend to the 'Big Bang' but we have to take the whole counsel of God and look at all of Scripture. These verses imply there was a starting point..... Interesting, no? God bless.

[@edwardhine9224]

When God said let their be that was the big bang. When God said this is my son in whom I'm well pleased, his voice sounded like thunder.

[@PafMedic]

I Always Said As A Child On..If The Big Bang Happened..Then God Spoke For It To Happen,But As These Guys Say…No Solid Evidence🙏🏻❤️🙏🏻

[@Jewonastick]

So god was just talking to himself like some sort of psychopath?

[@JesusistheonetrueGod]

Not so. There was no big bang, just God said.

[@tjsays8916]

There was no "big bang" as scientists claim.

[@edwardhine9224]

@@Jewonastick Why don't you ask him when you meet him when you die.

[@nancygriffith597]

So when is the Sabbath?

[@johannjohann6523]

I had a friend ask me: "Do you believe in the Big Bang theory, or God". I answered: "Both". Naturally this confused him. But what better example of God (the greatest scientist of all by the way) than from "Nothing" you get "Something"? Is that not one of the premier definitions of a "God"? Tesla said: "If you wish to understand the mysteries of the Universe think in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration." Does that not fit the narrative: "God spoke, and thus it happened?"

[@tedrowell659]

The real authentic big bang was when God spoke it all in to existence.

[@ramondtaylor134]

Lol absolutely false in every way. No one was around when He created the heavens and the earth so how does anyone know about a big bang! Ridiculous

[@ramondtaylor134]

Let’s make it 100percent clear that this earth is also not a spinning ball it’s fixed immovable, and it’s not spinning at all. Cannot be measured but has 7 firmaments and water above. There is no universe either it’s lights and luminaries. Let’s get back to bible

[@TheRealTrucido]

@@ramondtaylor134 Look into what holds everything together. (Frequency) and what is sound/speaking? Hmmmmm. Colossians 1:17 ESV And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

[@johnl4933]

Which word did he use?

[@ramondtaylor134]

@@TheRealTrucido what does this have anything to do with a spinning ball? Hmm

[@musebulebrian1357]

The saddest thing I have had an atheist say when faced with the evidence of how ridiculous and how unreliable the big bang's so-called evidence is as well as how the story has changed over time was this in paraphrase. 'The beauty is in the process of finding out how the universe actually began'. To think that a man would stake their hope of finding the truth in 'the process of discovering it' is terrifying to me. Personally I want to know the truth now. And if whosoever is promising it to me keeps changing their story why in the whole wide world would I trust anything they say. After all, they might change their truth having taught it.

[@katamas832]

The fact that you think learning and being open to new information is sad is the actual saddest thing.

[@tjsays8916]

​@@sterlingfallsproductions3930it's not that you're getting smarter. You're just getting sneakier.

[@toldyouso5588]

If you are in court, and you keep changing your story each time you get caught then say in my defehse your honor that's the beauty of my alibi. The judge will simply say, you should have pleaded the 5th and kept your mouth shut. Now you"re going to jail for perjury.

[@paulthompson9668]

This one is *so* going to be reacted to!

[@billjohnson9472]

So suppose that the big bang model is shown not be compatible with observation - that does not lend support to any other theory. I'm not sure what the point they are trying to make is, and what kind of connection they are trying to make between evolution and the 'big bang' theory. One they they don't provide is how whatever theory they propose matches up with the observed evidence.

[@slipvskorn]

The big bang was the Word - John 1:1, "In the beginning was the Word."

[@Svetka.A]

Jesus was the Big Bang? Are you forgetting "And the word became flesh and dwelt amongst men as his only begotten son" John 1:14

[@stevepierce6467]

I see they spelled it wrong; In the Biginbang was the word.

[@manuaiipondraken8376]

John 1:1 is the eternal bigining. Gen 1:1 is the creation bigining. 2 different bigining.

[@Svetka.A]

@@manuaiipondraken8376 Same beginning. God's spoken Word (Jesus) created. Gen 1:26 " Then the Lord said 'Let US create man in OUR image".

[@georgeb9046]

Great Video Guys keep making them I learned a lot, within the first 10 minutes of the video. All GLORY AND PRAISE TO THE LORD JESUS CHRIST!! THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

[@betsieswartz]

You can only learn anything from these people, that they are some of the dumbest people to walk the Earth.

[@francismcglynn4169]

“...no weapon that is fashioned against you shall succeed, and you shall refute every tongue that rises against you in judgment. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord and their vindication from me, declares the Lord.” (Isaiah 54:17) Notice that though the Servant of the Lord foretold by Isaiah, Jesus Christ, is the one who exemplifies what is promised, the promise is extended to all those who are true servants of the Lord as Isaiah goes on to describe them.

[@paulcarpenter3748]

The Great Red Spot should be renamed "The Fiery Serpent of Jupiter."

[@Flagrum3]

You guys didn't explain the real reason for the name "Axis of Evil" brought in by the scared seculars. The reason is probably the most amazing discovery seen and/or observed, and brings strong evidence for the position of the earth in the cosmos, which all Christians should be aware of.

[@hectorhernandez215]

Amen...is "evil" for secular scientists because it proves the priviledge in cosmos we have....so strong evidence for a Designer... (God)....

[@1914inheaven]

Have you ever seen a bomb explode and aftermath was order? 😂 Believing into big bang is like believing a bag full of letter blocks dumped out and an Encyclopedia comes out 😂

[@1914inheaven]

@@LordMathious 😂 well you keep on believing that and I’ll keep on believing this! 😂 as someone who lived through the war there’s nothing you can say to convince me that aftermath of an explosion is order.

[@dooglitas]

@@LordMathious The analogy is completely compatible. I don't know what you mean by "conventional explosion." There are many kinds of explosions, but they all share the same basic nature. They explode violently from a central point. Therefore, the Big Bang does indeed qualify as an explosion. And the settling of expelled material is not "order." No explosion ever creates a highly organized, complex system. If you blow up a quadrillion piles of bricks, you will never get a brick house. The same principle applies to the Big Bang. There is no scientifically sound explanation for how this Big Bang could suddenly form atoms of hydrogen and helium. There is no scientifically sound explanation for how such atoms could turn into stars. It is against the laws of physics.

[@dooglitas]

@@LordMathious Saying that explosions create order does not make it so. I challenge you to give a single example of an explosion creating highly organized, complex systems. It never happens. You're just saying stuff. Not all explosions are the result of chemical reactions. There are nuclear explosions and decompression explosions. The Big Bang is simply another kind of explosion. If I said it was like a chemical explosion, you would be right, but that is not what I said. You cannot explain the Big Bang theory anywhere or any time. It is not a possibility. Ridiculing me by the insulting remark about middle school physics or simply saying I don't understand physics is not a valid argument. People resort to ridicule when they have not actual facts or valid arguments. The Big Bang is impossible. There is no explanation for how an infinitely dense singularity could come into existence from absolute nothingness. All time, space, matter, energy, physical laws, and natural processes exist INSIDE the universe. They are part of the fabric of the universe. Before the universe existed, there could not have been any natural processes, no energy, and no space (i.e., no PLACE) for the universe to exist IN. If you posit that the singularity magically came to exist, then you have the problem that inside an infinitely dense singularity, time would be at a complete standstill. All events occur over some period of time, no matter how brief. inside an infinitely dense singularity, no time would pass at all. Therefore the expansion (or explosion) could not occur.

[@tjsays8916]

​@@LordMathiouswasn't the same as a conventional explosion? So it was some sort of weird anomaly that has never been seen since? Lol

[@tjsays8916]

​@@LordMathious"explosions create order" dude, I don't know where you're coming up with this stuff but it's funny.

[@Thinkingboutit7777]

Expanding into what?

[@sinclairj7492]

Genesis 1:2 also reads that the world was without form and void.

[@DanielJV8043]

a book said one thing, but a song tells us something different: "Our whole universe was in a hot, dense state Then nearly fourteen billion years ago expansion started, wait The earth began to cool, the autotrophs began to drool Neanderthals developed tools We built a wall (we built the pyramids) Math, science, history, unraveling the mysteries That all started with the big bang (bang)" songs cant ever be wrong so i guess this finally settles this😇

[@tjsays8916]

God doesn't need man's help in figuring out how He did things. It isn't a matter of what God could have done. it's a matter of what he said he did. Christians need to stop playing around with this stuff and trust God.

[@jpmlns2008]

They need to sound smarter than the lenders. Hahaha

[@pendragonshall]

The guy on the left I am certain is sincere and seems like a likable guy. And I believe he fully believes that he has to act this way. But I haven't found anyone that likes to be treated childishly and spoken to the way he does. His "we"re losing them with", "what he means is", move on because their eyes are glazing over etc. if you feel that actually happens you keep that to yourself and you find a nice creative way to explain something. Don't interrupt somebody else constantly saying things like that. I'm a Christian and this is meant to be constructive. Please take it that way. Still loved the episode

[@holidayrap]

(God is the Creator. We don't explain Him, He explains us!) The scriptures are laid before thee, yea, and all things denote there is a God; yea, even the earth, and all things that are upon the face of it, yea, and its motion, yea, and also all the planets which move in their regular form do witness that there is a Supreme Creator.

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

Are you rapping?

[@thomasmyers9128]

Fairy tales are more believable than the Big Bang 😳

[@stevesherman1743]

Karl Popper … wasn’t he the lead singer and harmonica player for ‘Blues Traveler’ ? 😊

[@annonemus21]

how are we supposed to disprove the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB)?

[@tjsays8916]

Have you looked it up on their website?

[@tjsays8916]

@@ji8044 sure it is, bud. It's actually really good and ICR and CMI have great responses too. I'd bet a million dollars you can't disprove what they say on that.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

The big bang theory is over. RIP and prepare the funeral arrangements . 🙂🙏✝️

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​@@LordMathiousoh yes. Believe it.

[@captanblue]

I haven't seen much evidence suggesting something can come from nothing.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​@@LordMathiousthere is no evidence for the big bang. The JWST has ensured that.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​@@LordMathious perhaps you should listen to your boy, Michio Kaku. He should help you on this.

[@Jewonastick]

@@captanblue Exactly.... Yet millions of theists believe in exactly that.

[@danielrickel8807]

I know enough about the Big Bang to laugh my head off. It’s at best a dull fairytale for adults, but for me it’s a lie of the devil.

[@toldyouso5588]

It started when these accademics were on a convention and as usual they got drunk and went to the bordello. At breakfast before the next day session, someone brought up, boy that was quite a big bang last night. Say that's a good name for how the universe was born, so it's agreed then, big bang it is.

[@tjsays8916]

Yes, it is definitely a lie from the devil

[@statutesofthelord]

@@razark9 razark, "Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening". That means it fails the scientific method.

[@statutesofthelord]

@@razark9 razark thinks he can refute Richard Dawkins' quote?

[@statutesofthelord]

@@razark9 razark runs away when faced with the fact that: "Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening"! Instead of denying observed facts that show Evolution does not pass the scientific method, why not repent of your rebellion against your Creator who loves you so much he not only died on a cross for your sins, he resurrected after three days, went to heaven, and is coming back soon surrounded by millions of angels to judge us all for how we have lived these lives he so lovingly created for us. Won't you do that today?

[@luish1498]

why should «evolutionist» worry about TBB?

[@narnia1233]

Oh wow, Cincy, that’s my city. Representing!

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

I love how so many people just assume the big bang to be true and yet 90% of it is mere speculation. With God we don't have to speculate. His word is very clear.

[@Jewonastick]

So clear that it has lead to thousands of different Christian denominations...

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

@@Jewonastick how many have been saved? Does it matter what denomination to go to if they find salvation in Jesus Christ? No, I don't think it does.

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

@@sterlingfallsproductions3930 really? How many religions do you believe stemmed from the Jewish one?

[@Jewonastick]

@@RobertA-oi6hw I think none of them have been saved as I don't believe that anyone has to be saved from anything.... Plus that's all irrelevant. If the word of "gawd" was clear there wouldn't be thousands of different Christian denominations. There wouldn't even be any need for apologetics..

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

@@Jewonastick no, that just means that people are fallible. Simple as that. How people respond to God's word will vary. Atheists have read it and come out knowing absolutely nothing.

[@ChrisFerguson-zm4gt]

Watching this for laughs...for knowledgeable people this video will be ridiculous

[@clarkkent5433]

Amazing how people believe there is a designer when it comes to a house or car But refuse the concept of a designer behind the earth and human beings

[@betsieswartz]

There’s this really cool thing called evolution. You should look it up sometime.

[@berylackermann8240]

Bless you Brethren for standing on TRUTH. For TRUTH WILL ALWAYS STAND. As our GREAT GOD SAID "MY thoughts and ways are HIGHER than mans. Far beyond what man can even hope to imagine.

[@betsieswartz]

If the truth always stands, this shouldn’t be standing.

[@tedrowell659]

I find it interesting how Hollywood and science get mingled. For example. Marvels multiverse storyline. Its now just about common knowledge thats there's infinate timelines and universes. It was a moviefolks..

[@toldyouso5588]

Before that it was planet of the apes.

[@mitchellminer9597]

Evolution and the big bang are two entirely different and unrelated fields of science. This video is lost from its own title. The video itself is a joke. It is persuasive only to those who already agree with the speakers. The premise of it is risible, and the examples ridiculous. But they do have that air of sincerity that is all some folks understand.

[@adelinomorte7421]

***wen we speak about religion we must be very much aware of material and spiritual realities; if you do not have a clear understanding of the spiritual is not possible to discuss anything about religion, is like to discuss the flavour of the bread fruit if we never eat it. In those channels about religion it is mostly forgotten the spiritual side of the subject. The way I see it anyway, God is a spirit, so if you do not understand the attributes of God if you think like a man without being blessed by GOD the spirit, you will go nowhere, and to get it, if you do not really have it, dig all your life for it, if you are honest to yourself you will be blessed .***

[@Unique_Monk]

God took 6 days and a seventh to rest and later told us to use the 1 day to equal 1000 yrs 6 days - 6000 yrs, and then Yeshua comes back to spend a thousand yrs with us without sin in that world

[@m0x910]

Where is the scripture to back this up?

[@philipmcclure6273]

Atheists would mock this mathematical equation: zero + zero = infinity. However, they totally trust that when the origin of the universe is in question, nothing + no one = everything.

[@Svetka.A]

​@@LordMathiousAccording to your made up equation; X = matter, Big Bang and the Universe. Wow, your so logical and intelligent!

[@Igflwi67ami4]

First there was nothing, then it exploded.

[@Svetka.A]

@@LordMathious I can't believe you doubled down on your idiotic X equation. The actual BB theory is based on the hypothesis that all matter of the universe from a big bang at a particular time in a remote place. Your "X" equation doesn't represent this theory. If the big bang theory happened, then I'd like to know when and where it happened. Where did the energy come from and where did the space come from for the matter to expand into? Where did the organisation information come from? There are a host of questions that are alot harder for you to answer, no matter how many word salads you string together. This Universe isn't just random molecules circulating around. It carries information. An atheist/evolutionist can never answer; where did this information come from. Where did the energy and matter itself come from. And yet you gripe about my belief. You believe hundreds of things by faith that you don't even understand. You either think matter is eternal or it can create itself. That's your two choices. Did it just happen by itself or its all just imaginary? You're suddenly faced with the option that we're not really here at all. You're faced with the option of: . We are not really here, this is all just an imagination, or . It had a beginning, or . Matter is eternal which is in violation of thermal dynamics. Matter doesn't create itself, and everything degrades over time. So either it had a beginning or it didn't. How did this matter suddenly become alive? How did it learn how to reproduce and then learn how to make others than it's own kind? Even though nobody has ever seen this. The only difference between you and me is that I admit my beliefs as a religion, whereas you don't admit yours is and call yours science and everyone else should pay for your religion to be taught. And that is clear indoctrination and not an education.

[@Svetka.A]

@@LordMathious If the concept that a Spiritual force cannot have an effect on a material body, then you'd have to explain emotions and love and hatred and envy and jealousy and rationality. If your brain is just a random collection of chemicals that formed by chance over billions of years, how on earth can you trust your own reasoning process?

[@Svetka.A]

@@LordMathious The Bible explains the simultaneous existence of Time, Space and Matter in 10 words: " In the beginning" ( Time) "God created the heavens" ( Space) "and Earth" (Matter) Just so you know, Time is; past, present and future. Space has; length, width and height. Matter has; Solid, liquid and gas. And there my friend, We have the Trinity of all trinities created instantaneously and God who created them has to be outside of them. God is not limited by time or space or matter. It's far more easier for me to believe " In the beginning God", then in a hypothesis that considers Holywood CGI animated imagery as evidence for a theory.

[@ChrisFerguson-zm4gt]

God didn't say anything...it doesn't exist. Feel free to prove me wrong by providing some evidence.

[@PortmanRd]

Blessed day.

[@TurtleTrackin]

The first statement he made - "science doesn't say anything" was a key one. This is a philosophical truth as science has no ontology-- it can't "say" anything. Are there any other videos that break this down for laypeople and explain it? If not, there should be. "Science" is a method. It can no more explain things than "Carpentry" can build a table. A good carpenter can build a good table, and a bad carpenter might build a bad one. Likewise, a good scientist comes to good conclusions and a bad scientist comes to bad ones. But even a good scientist can come to a bad conclusion if he messes up the science in some way, just as a good carpenter may use bad wood or get in a hurry and produce a poor table.

[@jasonwarren9279]

"Secular" "science" is such nonsense that the deeper I delved into it, the less atheistic I became and the more sense Christianity made.

[@joshuakohlmann9731]

Evolution is biology; the Big Bang is cosmology. Oh my giddy aunt. We haven't even got past the _title_ and he's made a whopping great mistake.

[@stevelawrence8352]

I believe in the "BIG BANG" Theory. I believe God said, "Let There Be",and BANG!!!!!!!!!!! There it was.

[@LocoFucker]

To think you need religion to be a good person is illogical

[@lewis726]

I think the problem with this Channel is that it takes the bible way to literally, if they read the bible in it’s traditional language (ancient Hebrew - Old Testament and Koine Greek - New Testament ) and in its proper historical context you would get completely different meanings. I read the bible and I agree with it, however it’s not everything. I have experiences every day which are not mentioned in the bible, are they not true? Do I have to refer all my life experiences to the bible to make sure that what’s going on is real? They say they don’t believe the Big Bang, that everything came from one thing. But they do believe god created it all. Is that not a contradicting statement? They also say as an argument against deep time why did god wait that long. Then why was Jesus born a child, why did we have to wait 30 years before he started his teachings. Couldn’t he have just appeared as the world did?

[@timothyvenable3336]

You confused me a little. You said this ministry takes the Bible way too literally… but Genesis is a historical narrative, so why wouldn’t they take Genesis literally? But then you went on about experiences not being real or trustworthy. I’m not sure where you got that idea. This channel goes about things in a way that sometimes isn’t the best… but I don’t see what that has to do with anyone’s personal experiences. If I’m misunderstanding you I’m sorry. Just trying to make sense of your concerns

[@Svetka.A]

Had you literally read the Bible as you claim then you'd know that Jesus's birth, ministry and crucifixion was prophesied in the Old Testament.

[@susannemedina7955]

I think you're doing a great job of honestly thinking about these things. Jesus was the second Adam. He took on human form and had to live as a man without ever sinning in order to redeem us from the curse of death. If he came like the Big bang into existence no one would be able to relate to him and he would not be able to fully understand what it meant to be human and lack ability to be our perfect Lord able to understand us completely and as God deliver us from all of our temptations and trials and tests. If you want to know him he is available 24/7 to answer the questions of a person asking truthfully.

[@WILL-rp3tz]

nothing in the fictional bible is supposed to be taken literally, it's all allegorical and about the message

[@timothyvenable3336]

@@WILL-rp3tz I don’t believe in a fictional Bible

[@ryana1787]

The level of ignorance displayed by this conversation between these 2 men is entertaining.

[@m0x910]

Please elaborate…

[@ryana1787]

I mean, where to start. The idea that a human needs to have been present and seen the Big Bang, or else it’s a religious belief - shows immediately that they don’t want to understand the scientific method. In science you can observe and test the present day consequences of a past event. The Big Bang is a scientific theory because it’s very well evidenced. The other hilarious part is when they note that the Big Bang model is constantly updated and refined with new information - and act as if that’s a bad thing. That’s what we should always do with models. The best though is when they say “that’s not what god says.” As though god wrote genesis and floated it down on a cloud. Clearly these men don’t care about truth.

[@Riverrage_03]

I love ppl say oh I believe in God just not his word! If you can’t believe in worldly things how can you believe in heavenly things!! Then your prayers how can he make them come true if you don’t believe in him and tell him!

[@jasonevans-77]

Dr. James P. Gills has some great technical deep scientific data that is Biblically and scientifically accurate. Exceeding Gratitude for a Creators Mind is an amazing book. It's supposed to be a devotional, but it's packed with great information. Plus the bibliography in the appendix section is phenomenal. He uses scientific data that is relevant and real. I hope you find The Truth, Jesus, along the line somewhere. Which is more important than any dodgy information, or scientific criteria. God Bless 🙏😇🙏

[@betsieswartz]

If it’s biblically accurate, it isn’t science