exact value of sin(3 degrees)

In this video, we will find the exact value of sin(3 degrees). We will see the special special triangles and the angle difference formula! ft. sin(15), sin(18), cos(15), cos(18)
Check out Toby's (Tibees) Channel: • Proving the Most Beaut...
Purchase your Klein Bottle Kitty t-shirt here crowdmade.com/...
Check out Chester's Channel: • Interviews Ep. 1 - BPR...
T-shirts: teespring.com/...

[@tibees]

Thank you for the shout out! 😺

[@blackpenredpen]

Tibees thank you for the t-shirt! I love it!!

[@Mnemonic-X]

@@blackpenredpen Do you really think that you do math with this absurd imaginary unit?

[@ИванЧимша-Гималайский]

+Rahul Can't blame him lol

[@gregorystocker971]

Сергей Мишин imaginary numbers are used in a ton of real world physics situations. The name makes them seem like someone made them up for no reason, but they are very legitimate.

[@abutaha4977]

Hi Tibees

[@QueenParity]

I asked my calc 1 professor in college to show me how to solve for sin or cos of any angle, she said she didn't know (?????). Didn't say anything about a taylor series or how there are ways to solve for it other than just looking at the unit circle or taking advantage of the difference function

[@kamilkamil2480]

1-x, what are you waiting for so long?

[@zombiekiller7101]

How I do it sin(3) => here 3 is very small so Therefore sin(3) = 3

[@matej_grega]

BPRP is changing to BPRPBP - BlackPenRedPenBluePen

[@stewartzayat7526]

Mathematician: sin(3°)=((sqrt(5)-1)(sqrt(6)+sqrt(2))-2(sqrt(3)-1)sqrt(5+sqrt(5)))/16 Physicist: sin(3°)=pi/60 Engineer: sin(3°)=0

[@AndDiracisHisProphet]

Engineers more like "three is small, so sin(3°) = 3"

[@maxsch.6555]

lmao

[@PuzzleQodec]

@@AndDiracisHisProphet (Which is pi/60.)

[@NateROCKS112]

@@PuzzleQodec and the Fundamental Theorem of Engineering states that pi=3 so we plug it in and we get 1/20" = 0.05"

[@edwardhuff4727]

@@AndDiracisHisProphet Use that and the bridge falls down. sin(3°)=sin(3π/180)=sin(π/60)≈π/60

[@GreenMeansGOF]

11:03 *thought download begins* 12:07 *thought download complete*

[@pedroandrade8727]

lol

[@blackpenredpen]

Hahahhahahahha!!!!!

[@poutineausyropderable7108]

@@pedroandrade8727 sounds like a MC villager trying to scam you into giving some emerald.

[@MrCoffeypaul]

That was fast!

[@pyglik2296]

I was genuinely frightened for he NEVER stops in his videos :)

[@jeremyzamayla2607]

"1+1+1 =3" We did it boys, an A in maths 👏👏👏

[@ffggddss]

That's from John Lennon, _The Beatles,_ "Come Together" (Abbey Road) - "One and one and one is three, "Got to be good lookin' cause he's so hard to see, "Come together "Right now, "Over me." Fred

[@THE-BIG-JP-REILS]

ffggddss I HAD THE SAME EXACT THOUGHT

[@colleen9493]

Math*

[@captasticts8419]

@@colleen9493 both is fine

[@kaaiplayspiano7200]

18-15=3

[@DjVortex-w]

At 11:05 you can almost hear the cogwheels turning in his head...

[@hamiltonianpathondodecahed5236]

this question is very easy using the fundamental theorem of engineering *sin x ≈ x* | x in radians | *π ≈ 3* using these we get the answer as 0.05 %error of 4.5%

[@Tactix_se]

💀💀💀💀

[@RealFreshDuke]

@@analog_joe No, it's pi = 3.

[@ajety]

@@analog_joe Dude it's just a joke

[@glendenog9095]

​@@ajety Jokes are supposed to be funny. Like how funny it is that the top rated comment is from a bunch of math fanboys who are so divorced from reality that they accept 3 degrees as an input for a special case solution without question even though angles (and all measurements) are analog values in every case with tolerances (aka limits), and instead of contemplating their own limitations are like "engineers are sooo dumb hyuk hyuk". Congrats you have solved sin(3), a contrived impossibly accurate degree reading, which was solved to the n'th digit long ago to actual usable digits, using the most convoluted and inefficient method. I'm not entirely sure who didn't get the "joke" here :)

[@odysseasv7734]

@@glendenog9095 HAHHAAHHAHAHHAAHAHAH WHAT

[@alexharkler]

3:03 "Of course, 1 is equal to 2" -BPRP 2019

[@anshumanagrawal346]

3:03 actually

[@not_allen1107]

1 = 2

[@andrewalex3581]

Me on exams: 11:03

[@rafaelv.t1403]

im the opposite

[@alinajib4788]

@@rafaelv.t1403 but you're gay

[@andrewalex3581]

Rafael V.T ok

[@AbhishekKumar-jg7gq]

😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁

[@astralchan]

11:02 Me during an exam

[@blackpenredpen]

Zackary자카리 Me during a video.

[@keescanalfp5143]

@@blackpenredpen, great. I can't but admire that

[@astralchan]

@@blackpenredpen SENPAI NOTICED ME ~~

[@kaaiplayspiano7200]

@@astralchan is it legal to say Japanese-originated words to a chinese person?

[@kaaiplayspiano7200]

@@keescanalfp5143~ I CAN

[@bruhmoment1835]

Bprp: *Runs math channel like a boss* Also bprp: *1=2*

[@aravindmuthu95]

I almost read as "Bprp runs meth" 😂😂

[@Mihau_desu]

"1 is equal to 2" - bprp 2019 Btw. Great video

[@blackpenredpen]

Sigma 1 thank you!

[@kennylim3034]

Really shows you even an expert has troubled moments

[@Roescoe]

processing processing, I felt like I was in the moment.

[@easygoing1719]

I take my pen and ruler, draw a Triangle with one angle of 3 Degrees and an angle of 90 Degrees and then use the Definition of sin. I am a simple man...

[@gumanelson2007]

And then hope your pencil is infinitely sharp and the angle is perfectly 3 and you measure the distance very accurately.

[@darkseid856]

@@gumanelson2007 never knew that one can make angles using a ruler .

[@akunog2708]

@@darkseid856 It's easy to make relatively precise right triangles using a ruler if you know the length of the legs.. but yeah, since the length of the legs is kind of the goal it's not helpful here hehe. This is probably why ~easygoing~ considers himself a simple man.

[@darkseid856]

@@akunog2708 yea that was basically what i was saying

[@gumanelson2007]

@@darkseid856 after using a compass or protractor

[@Periiapsis]

For sin and cos of 15° couldn't you have also used the difference formula for sin and cosine? sin(45 - 30) = sin(45)cos(30) - cos(45)sin(30) cos(45 - 30) = cos(45)cos(30) + sin(45)sin(30)

[@blackpenredpen]

Perihelion Orbit yea. You can also use that picture to prove that formula.

[@themcscripter2111]

I think he was proving the sum and difference formula using complex numbers

[@MattMcIrvin]

I can never remember those formulas, but I can remember how to derive them with complex numbers. BPRP took a while to do it because he was being very explicit about writing out all the steps. For the 15 degree bit, I figured he was going to bring out complex numbers again to derive the half-angle formulas, which is definitely how I would do it, but he had a cleverer way.

[@epikherolol8189]

@@MattMcIrvin what's there in remembering them, it's not even that hard, for me it's like if it's cos formula then all cos terms together+- sin terms together If it's sin formula then angles exchange

[@Zain-nc1ww]

@@MattMcIrvin The way I was taught to derive the half angle formulas was to first derive cosine's double angle formula, then isolate cos(a), and plug (π/2)-a into the cosine half angle formula to derive the sine half angle formula cos(a+b) = cosacosb - sinasinb cos(a+a) = (cosa)^2 - (sina)^2 cos(2a) = (cosa)^2 - (sina)^2 cos(2a) = 2(cosa)^2-1 (cos(2a)+1)/2 = cosa^2 √((cos(2a)+1)/2) = cosa √((cos(2((π/2)-a)+1)/2) = cos((π/2)-a) √((cos(π-2a)+1)/2) = cos((π/2)-a) √((1-cos(2a))/2) = cos((π/2)-a) √((1-cos(2a))/2) = sin(a) I'm curious how you'd derive it with complex numbers; I've never seen that before

[@Metalhammer1993]

Wohoo I'm not the only one deriving the angle sum from Euler's formula! My professor thought me mental xD. Didn't subtract points but asked me if I'm slightly troubled that I find that simpler than geometric proofs xD

[@gutschke]

"If your only tool is a hammer, ..." And to be honest, Euler's formula does make for a wonderful hammer.

[@miniwizard]

厉害！But my abacus doesn't have the square root function, so I'm still unable to calculate the exact value.

[@juxx9628]

oh, just approximate square roots the archimedes way. you know, dividing, squaring and adding some bunch of numbers and taking days to just get 7 decimals of precision.

[@hussiensayed1244]

Can we do this without triangels 1]for 18° For this equation sin(X)=cos(4X) X=18° satisfies the eq where 4*18=72=90-18 We know cos(4X)=2cos^2(2X)-1 =2(1-sin^2(x))^2-1 Let y=sinx Then y=1+8y^4-8y^2 8y^4-8y^2-y+1=0 This eq has 4 solutions but one of them is sin18 8y^2(y^2-1)-(y-1)=0 (y-1)(8y^2(y+1)-1)=0 y=1 is a sol but not sin 18 cuz sin90=1 8y^3+8y^2-1=0 8y^3+4y^2+4y^2-1=0 4y^2(2y+1) + (2y-1)(2y+1)=0 (2y+1)(4y^2+2y-1)=0 y=-0.5 is a sol but not sin18 cuz sin 210=-0.5 4y^2+2y-1=0 y=(-2±sqrt(16+4)) /(2*4) =0.25(-1±sqrt(5)) Two solutions but we have one +ve solution and we know sin 18 is +ve Then sin 18° =0.25(-1+sqrt(5)) Cos 18° =sqrt(1-sin^2 (18)) =sqrt(1-(6-2sqrt(5))/16) =sqrt(5-sqrt(5))/2sqrt(2) 2]for 15° Cos 30=2 cos^2(15)-1 Cos15=sqrt((1+sqrt(3)/2)/2) =sqrt(4+2sqrt3)/2sqrt2 =sqrt(3+2sqrt3+1)/2sqrt2 =sqrt((sqrt3)^2+2(sqrt3)+1))/2sqrt2 =sqrt( (sqrt3+1)^2 ) /2sqrt2 =(sqrt3+1)/2sqrt2 Sin15=sqrt(1-cos^2(15)) =sqrt((1-sqrt(3)/2)/2) =sqrt(4-2sqrt3)/2sqrt2 =sqrt(3-2sqrt3+1)/2sqrt2 =sqrt((sqrt3)^2-2(sqrt3)+1))/2sqrt2 =sqrt( (sqrt3-1)^2 ) /2sqrt2 =(sqrt3-1)/2sqrt2 3] finally sin 3°=sin (18°-15°) =sin18°cos15°-cos18°sin 15°

[@lambda2693]

Woah nice sol

[@unidentifieduser5346]

my brain be like😮‍💨

[@tranminhhieu9492]

No one: Minecraft Villager: 11:03

[@IoT_]

I work as a teacher of control systems which involves a lot of different math subjects. Thank you for showing HOW TO TEACH STUDENTS. I like how you tell in detail mathematics. I really appreciate it.

[@blackpenredpen]

Eg. M wow, what a comment! Thank you!!

[@spinningcycloid6447]

He teaches very friendly. Even for a simple calculation, he explains very kindly. So I can understand whole topic. Thank you for your works!

[@sharmsma]

The result should be almost equal to pi/60. For small angles, sin x approximates x with x in radians. Converting 3 degrees to radians is just multiply with pi/180.

[@blackpenredpen]

sharmsma yup that’s coming up soon

[@DavidvanDeijk]

(pi/60) - (pi/60) ^ 3 / 6 is a better estimate, expanded the taylor series by one

[@SyberMath]

Nice problem! I have 2 comments: 1. 23:52 it's easier to just say "divide the hypotenuse by sqrt(2) to get the leg so it's sqrt(3)/sqrt(2)" 2. 24:44 the second leg should be sqrt(3)/sqrt(2) not sqrt(3)/sqrt(3) 😊

[@jayapandey2541]

Also after calculating sin and cos of 45 and 30 why not just subtract? Everyone knows that 5+5+5=15 but I know that 45-30=15.

[@SatyaVenugopal]

That is kind of what he did. Just... geometrically

[@christianalbina6217]

Are we not able to to 45 degrees divided by 15 degrees or is that not allowed?

[@darkseid856]

@@christianalbina6217 boi thats not how it works ! (As much as I know it doesn't )

[@ashtonsmith1730]

if you want to do it with algebra you can, he did it with geometry

[@joshmcdouglas1720]

You could do this to find the values of sin15 and cos15 but you would need to use the angle difference identities again

[@patrickmckinley8739]

Digging through some of my old papers, I found where I ran this calculation years ago . I just ran the half angle formula on 30 degrees to get the sin and cos of 15 degrees. I love your construction to do it geometrically - never seen that before.

[@rmela4501]

For cos15 and sin15, couldn't you just use compound formula again...cos(45-30) and sin(45-30)?

[@jomama3465]

@Blackpenredpen

[@peterchan6082]

Ok I get your point, and I also had that in my mind. But then the geometric proof is what gives maths so much fun. Indeed I would expect Mr Chao (aka bprp) to show the geometric proofs for the formulas for compound angles, namely sin(A±B), cos(A±B) and indeed tan(A±B).

[@Gold161803]

@@peterchan6082 I like to do the geometric derivation of sin(A+B), but that one is all you need. You can use oddness of sine/evenness of cosine, sinA=cos(90-A) and vice versa, and tan=sin/cos to get all the others from there :)

[@peterchan6082]

@@Gold161803 Not quite enough. There are more to be desired. I already have several other geometric proofs of the compound angle formulas (some are simpler and even more beautiful than the one presented here) . . . indeed I've even done one for tan(A±B) from scratch, without the need to resort to sin(A±B)/cos(A±B)

[@Gold161803]

@@peterchan6082 well yeah, I know there are several lovely proofs of all of them, I'm just saying you can also just derive them all from sine of a sum if you'd rather be boring like me :p

[@natealbatros3848]

Will you do multivariable calc vids ? Or pde?

[@chandranisahanone]

Now just Solve Sin(1°)

[@jensonjoseph6296]

I learnt a lot of special specials for the 1st time, though I knew sin (18) and sin (15) algebraically. Also the proofs of sin (a-b). Thank you, you are a special special teacher : )

[@bayanmehr9663]

Super fun video :) I love how you talk about angles like they are people

[@blackpenredpen]

Bayan Mehr hahaha thank you

[@blackpenredpen]

Check out Toby's (Tibees) Channel: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y3LcdmSNpcyiabM Purchase your Klein Bottle Kitty t-shirt here crowdmade.com/collections/tibees/products/tibees-toby-unisex-t-shirt Check out Chester's Channel: kzbin.info/www/bejne/r3vMoYdtn9uNh9k Thanks! 100/(1-x)

[@nuklearboysymbiote]

Ok but to prove Euler's formula you NEEDED to already know the compound angle formulae. But here u r USING Euler's to show the compound angle… CIRCULAR REASONING

[@obama2150]

at 17:30 i think it would be better to sqrt the 16 to 4and the bottom. this would've made it easier later on at 30:34 since both partheses would have denominator of 8sqrt2 to make it much easier to simplify? since both sides will have a 4 and a sqrt2 gr8 vido m8 tho.

[@hustler3of4culture3]

Without watching I'm gonna say π /60.

[@hustler3of4culture3]

Ok this is better than my guess

[@nimmira]

after watching this ... I'm ready to consume 3 large pizzas (with each slice's tip at 18 degrees wide)

[@blackpenredpen]

nimmira hahaha nice!!

[@moskthinks9801]

(In funny, annoyed tone) No! Prove it all geometrically! :cat:

[@blackpenredpen]

M. Shebl lol. I actually thought about it and it shouldn’t that bad. I could just do the same procedure when I constructed the 15-75-90 special special right triangle.

[@whyit487]

I like how this went back to your old video about special phi triangles! Also, I loved how there's such an elegant way to find an exact sine of an angle! Great job on the video.

[@not_vinkami]

Great! Let's find the relationship between sin(3°) and sin(15°) and construct the one-fifth angle formula!

[@Drk950]

Mmm I tried this way and i got a fifth order polynomial. Let A=3°, x=sin A, y=sin (5A), then y=16*(x^5) - 20*(x^3) + 5x. Problem: there Is no Solve formula for 5th order polynomial (Abel's theorem). So, i had to watch the video xD

[@elias69420]

@@Drk950 16x^5 - 20x^3 + 5x = 0 x(16x^4 - 20x^2 + 5) = 0 The root x = 0 is extraneous, ignore that 16x^4 - 20x^2 + 5 = 0 Let w = x^2 16w^2 - 20w + 5 = 0 Which is a quadratic equation :]

[@sarthakhingankar9158]

I love the silence starting from 11:02 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@jorgeeduardopereztasso6134]

Nobody: Me after reading the title: WHOT¿ ARE YOU SERIOUUS!?!?!? blackpenredpen: 0:01 #maths4fun

[@anshumanagrawal346]

Write 0:01 instead 0:00 doesn't work

[@رشاداليامي]

The video is old, but it contains valuable skills, and I benefited a lot from it. Thank you very much, Mighty Professor

[@szerednik.laszlo]

I should learn for my exams right now :D Here we go again bois!

[@harrisons62]

Laci yeah mine is next week :(

[@diegomullor8605]

Dude you're so amazing. I really appreciate all of your work. I'm 14 years old and I really like math. I never liked how it's explained on schools, it seemes really basic to me and doesn't give a chance to us math enthusiasts to go further. Thanks to people like you, I get to learn more about my passion, which is math. People often see math as a hard thing which involves tons of numbers, but in reality, thanks to people like you, I realised it's really about cool concepts an ideas. Keep up the good work, bprp, because what you're doing is amazing and for some of us, a lifechanger. Sorry for grammar mistakes, I'm spanish.

[@artemetra3262]

i strongly agree with every single thing you said. i think teachers should make the students *interested* in the subject and show its actual beauty. bprp must be an excellent teacher that i would LOVE to have. P. S. i'm Ukrainian and i thought Europe had better education, but i can't see any difference though... guess we are screwed ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[@diegomullor8605]

@@artemetra3262 Yeah you're right. People won't be interested if you just show formulas without proving them. Math is about concepts and ideas. We all really need to work on fixing education for next generations.

[@ningchin8476]

@@diegomullor8605 That's why I endorse Aops. Check them out at aops.com They've been a life changer for me!

[@fNktn]

that's easy; sin(x) = x, so sin(3°) = 3

[@saharhaimyaccov4977]

11:03 .. A magical moment of thought .. See how your mind works :) Like it

[@leonhardeuler6811]

Can someone explain to me why he paused

[@aldobernaltvbernal8745]

@@leonhardeuler6811 to think

[@ghoufranabokhalaf4964]

Thats really fantastic....you give us passion to learn new things....you've new subscriber from Aleppo, Syria 💐🌸

[@blackpenredpen]

Glad to hear! Thank you!

[@IrfanArif18]

Everybody knows 1+1+1 equals 3, but I know 2+2 is 4, minus 1 that's 3

[@CalamityInAction]

Irfan Arif Skraaaaaaaaaaa

[@andycheng4436]

now just multiply it by 60 to get sin(180)! so easy!

[@rafaelv.t1403]

It Doesn't Work That Way

[@Gold161803]

Let's use the Sine of a Sum formula fifty-nine times! Just to make sure!

[@ΛεωνίδαςΓκώγκος]

@@rafaelv.t1403 it is a joke At least I hope so

[@ДантеАлигьери-з9ю]

hey, bprp, how do you like the idea to make a video with analysis of the sinuses from 0 to 45 degrees? Maybe video will be for a few hours, but i think it won't stop you)

[@level10intellectual52]

Trigonometry really flares up my sinuses

[@mikrikbe]

Хмм, действительно интересная задумка

[@yaleng4597]

0.3M subscribers. Congrats!!!

[@blackpenredpen]

Yale NG yay thank you!

[@ozonejgs2887]

Tibbes is awesome, glad that you shouted her out. On a similar note, another great video. I've had less time to watch them because of my final high school exams (GCSEs), but I'm excited to binge watch all of them after they finish. I'm sure that after your videos, I'll have no problem getting the top grade in my Maths exam =D

[@Alians0108]

3:05 "One is equal to two"

[@pietergeerkens6324]

Astronomical Units: c = G = h = π = 1 = 2

[@stevesun11001]

The Euler formula is much harder to prove than trig identities, bro!

[@edsanville]

11:04 - I like my math videos like I like my Jerry Springer videos: Raw and Uncut.

[@blackpenredpen]

Edward Sanville I once put “raw footage” in my title but YT demonetized it.

[@pianoforte17xx48]

@@blackpenredpen filthy youtube

[@imagineexistance4538]

Today I learned that i=e^(i*pi/2) i^x=e^(i*pi*x/2) And x^iy= cos(y(log(x)))+i(sin(y(log(x))))

[@zuccx99]

By log do you mean ln?

[@imagineexistance4538]

ZRgaming basic log, the inverse of exp(x) or e^x

[@imagineexistance4538]

ZRgaming oh, I thought you meant what do you mean by log, yes ln,

[@user-yr3uj6go8i]

11:03 Literally me on my test two days ago.

[@NHL17]

This is evidence that mathematicians really don't mind that long walk for a short drink of water

[@irrelevant_noob]

32:35 everything fit, checkpoint reached... Now just fix the rectangle image by having the top-right triangle be 45-45-90 too. 😈

[@pietergeerkens6324]

Noting that (√ 5 - 1) = (√5 + 1 - 2) = 2⋅φ - 2 = 2⋅(φ - 1) = 2⋅√[ φ² - 2φ +1 ] = 2⋅√[ 2 - φ] and √[ 5 + √5 ] = √[ 4 + 2⋅φ ] = √2 ⋅ √[ 2 + φ] your final expression can be reduced to the nice anti-symmetric form [ √[2 - φ] ⋅ (√3 + 1) - √[2 + φ] ⋅ (√3 - 1) ] / 4√2. 😃

[@rex_yourbud]

16x⁵ - 20x³ + 5x - (sqrt(3)-1)/2sqrt(2) = 0 One of the solutions to this equation yields the value of sin(3°) Take it or leave it 💀

[@kavyajain_64]

Bro you can just use the trigonometric formula to get the value of cos 15⁰ which is Cos(45⁰-30⁰)=cos45⁰×cos30⁰+sin 45⁰ × sin 30⁰

[@ffggddss]

Whew! Does it get better, or just messier, if you try to simplify that? Numerator: (√5 - 1)(√6 + √2) - 2(√3 - 1)√(5+√5) = (√5 - 1)(√6 + √2) - 2√5(√3 - 1)√(√5 + 1) = √2[√15 + √5 - √3 - 1 + √(10+2√5) - √(30+6√5)] So it's the bracket divided by 8√2: sin(3º) = [√15 + √5 - √3 - 1 + √(10+2√5) - √(30+6√5)] / 8√2 = 0.0523359562429438... Yeah, it's probably not worth it... Anyway, thanks for this wild roller coaster ride! BTW, your "x" is just 1/φ = φ-1; and so, sin(18º) = ½x = 1/(2φ). That 36-72-72 isosceles triangle is in a regular pentagon, where two non-consecutive vertices are omitted. That is, it's two diagonals of a reg. pentagon, from one of its vertices, and the side opposite that vertex. And I presume you chose 3º because it's the smallest positive integer number of degrees that is "constructible." Fred

[@tylershepard4269]

sin(3 degrees) = sin(pi/60)=pi/60 because pi/60 is really small

[@chittasenapati1430]

That is an approximation

[@darkseid856]

@@chittasenapati1430 but an pretty accurate one .

[@_Matchu]

speedrunning sin(n degrees) from scratch for all n 0-360 WHEN?!?!?!

[@gergodenes6360]

Fun fact: We can only find the exact real-world value of the sine of something if it is a multiple of 3° (or is devided by a power of 2) If you have ever stumbled upon the triple-angle formula, and tried to reverse it, you know that trying to get sin(x) from sin(3x) gives you a third degree equation to solve. If you plug it in the Cardano-formula, you will always get a solution in the complex world, we cannot get a third-angle-formula in the reals, like we have a half-angle-formula. For the people interested: sin(3x)=3*sin(x) - 4*sin^3(x) gives sin(x)^3 - 3/4*sin(x) + 1/4*sin(3x)=0 Plugging it in the Cardano formula for sin(x), and simplifying, we get: sin(x) = 1/2 * [ cbrt( - sin(3x) + i * cos(3x)) + cbrt( - sin(3x) - i * cos(3x))] There will always be a number in the form a+bi under the cuberoot, and trying to plug it into Euler's formula will just give back that sin(x) = sin(x) If anyone knows how you'd get an exact soley real value for sin(1°), for example, please enlighten me.

[@nuklearboysymbiote]

If what u say is true, we can only bound sin(1°). That means get closer and closer approximations for the range of it, like what Chester did for sin(10°) on his channel

[@ciberiada01]

I don't know if it's only me, but as far as I know sin10° = (17427 − √3·√29·√2149867)/21600 and then I go with sin(10° − 9°) But personally I prefer sin10° = (5/12)²

[@bobbyheffley4955]

You can use the half-angle formula to obtain values for quarter angles.

[@douro20]

I'd say expand with FOIL and rewrite...but we've already done enough...

[@rishabhxchoudhary]

Why the the equation of line (altogether at infiniy):0x+0y+c=0? Is this even possible?

[@Dan-os1rg]

18 - 15 = 3 quick maths

[@maths-physicshub]

Wow this is really nice thanks for sharing this...

[@blackpenredpen]

maths- physicshub thank you!!!

[@rubenjaraba8999]

The denominator of the cosine of 18 degrees must be √5 because yo simplify using the commun factor

[@kutuboxbayzan5967]

[Cos(x)+isin(x)]^n=cos(nx)+isin(nx Find formula cos (nx) For n is integer.

[@15foxa19]

In my head using small angles i worked out pi/60 to be around 0.05236 so i will watch and see how close i was

[@andresfelipemunoz4417]

For a long time I looked for a channel like yours and when I found it it was better than I thought, friend you are the best, ahhhhh and by the way I will do the 100 integrals with you, hehe I already finished the derivatives but or my god I do not know how you resist so much standing time the truth I admire you very much

[@marinmaths3826]

You should do more videos on Feynman’s method bprp! I love all your videos tho.

[@eshaanrawal1167]

I have my maths exam on Friday I am scared even though I have done everything wish me luck😣😣😣😣😣😣😟

[@zuccx99]

Good luck. What will be on the exam. Remember to use the chen lu,prada lu, 1/1-x(best friend) and the list.

[@juliakuok]

It’s 4am, I have lessons at 9am, and idk why am I watching this now.

[@lukebuenafe3490]

Men you deserve 1million subscribers and you deserved the position of my professor in calculus

[@Firefly256]

Because we have sin(3), we can use that formula to find sin(6) because of sin(3+3), meaning we can find sin(any multiple of 3)

[@snbeast9545]

Take a shot every time he says "of course".

[@SeanStephensen]

How about sin(pi degrees)?

[@jayapandey2541]

Starting from scratch would mean creating the number system, then algebra, basic principles of geometry then trig and then calculus. Now for the Taylor Series ( and yes I am going to say Taylor and not McLauren series) and then prove Euler's Formula. Man thats a lot of work. 🙃🙃

[@blackpenredpen]

Oh man! I don’t know I can do all that in 30 min

[@jayapandey2541]

However, doesn't it just amaze you when you look back at the journey of Mathematics?

[@kutuboxbayzan5967]

Find formula 1+1/2+1/3...1/n for every real number.

[@sauldibari6598]

You know it’s serious when he becomes blackpenredpenbluepen

[@sciencifier3232]

I didn't do my homework because of the integral video challenge .😮☺😗😘 And got scolded by my teacher.....!

[@InTheBeginningTheUniverseWas]

so basically you proved the subtraction formula for cos and sin two different ways... really you only needed 1 way, preferably the geometric way since that doesn't rely on Euler's formula

[@user_2793]

From the fundamental theorem of engineering, this trivially reduces to π/60 ~= 0.0523

[@leonardoventura9641]

No! From the fundamental theorem of engineering π=3 and = = ~=, so sin(30°)=π/60=3/60=1/20

[@mikaeelshah7205]

I watched the video at 2 times speed

[@kassemhmady]

Time to grab some popcorn 🍿

[@MegaArti2000]

11:05 Fatal error

[@blackpenredpen]

Arthur Fonseca I knew it was 1-x but I forgot the reason lolll

[@taylormanning2709]

11:30 when you gotta read your own notes because you forgot how genius you used to be

[@Θρησκόληπτος]

i spotted circular reasoning at the proof of the angle sum formula: in order to prove euler's formula you need to know the derivative of sinx, which requires sin(a+b). So you can't use the result to prove the base. If you know any proof of the euler's formula without the derivative of sinx, please inform me

[@Θρησκόληπτος]

cos(a+b) and sin(a+b) can be proven using the dot and the cross product, respectively

[@aravinds3846]

Actually you can simply use approximation with limits

[@alessandromarchetti2766]

By knowing the sin and cosin of 3° we can also get sin and cosin for every angle multiple of three. For example sin(117°) = sin(120°-3°) = sin120°×cos3° - cos120°×sin3°. If you were to use the cubic formula on that equation you got a long time ago for the sin of 10 degrees (8x^3-6x+1=0 ; x=sin10°) we could then do the following: sin(7°) = sin(10°-3°) = sin10°×cos3° - cos10°×sin3° sin(4°) = sin(7°-3°) = sin7°×cos3° - cos7°×sin3° sin(1°) = sin(4°-3°) = sin4°×cos3° - cos4°×sin3° Then using sin^2(θ) + cos^2(θ) = 1 we can get the cosin of 1°. Knowing sin(1°) and cos(1°) we can use sin(α+β) = sinα×cosβ-cosα×sinβ and every other related formula to get the sin and cosin of every angle expressed by an entire amount of degrees.

[@MattMcIrvin]

I was watching this and wondering if the sine and cosine of any whole number of degrees was algebraic. But I poked around on Wolfram Alpha and realized that of course it is, because e^i*(one degree) = e^i*(pi/180) = (-1)^(1/180), so any sum of degrees can be expressed algebraically in terms of integer roots of -1. (Wikipedia says that defined trig function values of all rational multiples of pi are algebraic, which would incorporate all integer degrees. That is not to say they are *constructible* numbers, but I guess bprp just proved that trig functions of the multiples of 3 degrees are constructible?) (Edit: Yes, he did. Apparently any angle of a*pi/b degrees is constructible if and only if, in simplest form, b is a product of *unique* Fermat primes and a power of 2, and 3 degrees is pi/(3*5*2^2). 1 degree is not since its prime factorization has two 3s in it.)

[@keepercool98]

The engineering way: sin(3)~0 😂 Nice video, I really enjoyed.

[@warrickdawes7900]

Or use small angle approximation and say that sin(3 degrees) ~ 3 degrees ~ pi/60, which has an error of only 0.05%

[@ishanbhatt1123]

isn't the exact value of sin(3), just sin(3)

[@CDChester]

Almost thought you needed more whiteboards!!! #expandingpeyam

[@SirNobleIZH]

An entire whiteboard, 33 minutes of lecture, and tons of mental math... All to define a value already within the rounding range of 0 for engineers

[@johnseppethe2nd2]

He is not an engineer so that doesn't matter

[@kaaiplayspiano7200]

Me when he said 1=2: 11:03

[@WahranRai]

sin(alpha) ~ alpha (alpha in radian close to zero)

[@robertstecher]

mistake reversing 2 and sqrt 3 in the triangle at 23:33?