"Primordial Black holes from Another Universe" James Webb Telescope Finds Terrifying Things Beyond..

Рет қаралды 18,462

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 71

@AnTiThesis-HaT-HoT Күн бұрын

Excellent content, no silly ai infill graphics, no hyperbole, not one zee, sensible human narrative and a pause for thought at the end!

@LetsssGooooooooo Күн бұрын

The only thing more vast than the universe is the depth of human arrogance.

@thesjkexperience Күн бұрын

And, Ignorance 😂🎉❤❤

@jasonvaughan5128 8 сағат бұрын

Definitely. Couldn’t agree more.

@MrD_2112 Күн бұрын

ChatGPT is calling Penrose's CCC theories interesting but speculative since light from beyond our observable universe cannot reach us.

@JD-ny3vz Күн бұрын

Whoaaa I was just reading the Bhagavad Gita and it mentioned that the Universe is billions of years old and goes through and infinite cycle of birth and death. Fascinating

@gungadin1389 Күн бұрын

whitey is clueless.I am Indian btw

@JACKnJESUS Күн бұрын

Except that the 'calculations' of Brahma's lifespan works out to 311 trillion 40 billion years...way way off. Of course.

@KorAllRBare Күн бұрын

Any model that relies on a contradiction is not a fact and in fact it is a bad model and thus a bad construct, facts are free from all contradiction, only fiction is associated with contradiction. In short this means Everything has always existed no if's and no but's. The Universe AKA Everything is ageless, ageless because everything which is something can only ever begot from something or something else and thus at any point it could never have been begot from nothing no matter how far back or forward to the sequences of events we scrutinise "The presence of an existence" AKA "Everything" or "The Universe"..

@idonotlikethismusic 20 сағат бұрын

@@JACKnJESUSno, maybe that’s the point, time so long that for humans that timespan loses meaning

@John-vz5un 17 сағат бұрын

Yes in India they had a good grasp of numbers related to the size of the universe Etc and some pretty cool flying cars

@guidedmeditation2396 Күн бұрын

The physical universe doesn't start and stop, it cycles and repeats itself.

@animacuso100 Күн бұрын

Are you making a statement? is this a "I know the answer" sounds to me like religion "God is real, I know that, nothing else to say" Or maybe you had a poor choice of words?

@sluny1 6 сағат бұрын

We know nothing! Now let’s begin

@TheKitchenTechnician Күн бұрын

Maybe the Big Bang is what happens after a black hole becomes so large that it engulfs entire galaxies up to a point where it pulls all the matter in the entire universe into itself and then boom…new big bang. Over and over.

@emilnemyl448 Күн бұрын

It is logical, I don't know what they still can't get about it. As you need certain mass for stuff to become a star, to became a black hole, to become a planet, you need certain mass to became a big bang, that is all there is to it. I watch those people while shaking my head, this is the heliocentric problem all over again. Not that it matters much as we are yet to explore beyond our system.

@antonysherry4267 Күн бұрын

The big bang is a "white hole".

@FlamingOasis Күн бұрын

Black holes get smaller not larger. They infact dissipate over time.

@ArchonOne Күн бұрын

No, a big bang is what happens when you divide by 0, then pretend there’s an actual real world object represented by your equation. In reality there are no magical explosions that create something from nothing. This model is broken, non predictive and bares no resemblance to what we actually see when we look into space. It’s plasmoids at the center of galaxies, not black holes.

@OriruBastard Күн бұрын

@@FlamingOasis Dissipate over time when there's nothing to feast on.

@lelandgilsen9682 Күн бұрын

not black holes but bubbles/foam in spacetime

@mikeharrington5593 Күн бұрын

So the universe is just a sausage machine ?

@Peter7966 23 сағат бұрын

A mirror universe running running backward in time? Does that mean that what has happened and is happening in our universe is in reverse in our mirror universe? That would be like watching a movie from finish to start. That can't be.

@carstenf279 Күн бұрын

But - if matter was more dense 13 billion years ago - why would it be impossible for supermassive black holes to form? Seems more likely then than now. (or not - but please explain if You know)

@ArchonOne Күн бұрын

Because super condensed matter is unproven pseudoscience. CERN’s first experiment was to try to produce it. It failed. We have no coherent theory for how it can exist, we cannot make it or directly observe it, yet the entire standard model of gravity-centric space cannot function without it occurring naturally everywhere we look. You can claim an imploding star could do it, but you certainly came prove it, and infact you’d have to explain why we have now found at least a half dozen super nova stars that are still there and burning perfectly normally as if they’d never gone nova. The answer to all this is that the solar wind is electric current and Dr. Don Scott has proven it. Because that’s true, there is no need for super condensed matter or any of the other mathematical fictions that have been piled onto this rolling tenement of a model. The PLASMOID that is actually at the center of galaxies is more than strong enough to do everything we see in space, and we know this because we can produce them in a laboratory and study how they work, and like all electric effects, they are infinitely scalable from the galactic to the subatomic. Space is electric. Anyone who tells you different is lying or wrong.

@SolveEtCoagula93 11 сағат бұрын

It's a good question. After all, with all that matter around, wouldn't we actually expect black holes to form? The simple answer is that our current model suggests that matter would have far too much energy to be bound into 'clumps'. In order to for the clumps to begin, the Universe needs to cool down. At a certain point of cooling down, or expanding, tiny variations in the density of the Universe allow small clumps to form. These gradually grow by attracting more matter from the less dense areas. Eventually, we get to the point where stars form and, well, the rest, as they say, is history. The key here is that our current model works pretty well and there is a lot of evidence to support it. That model will change, of course, as new information comes in, and we understand the picture better.

@mickmunster6480 Сағат бұрын

I feel like a dog listening to the radio

@jorgerobles628 22 сағат бұрын

The Cosmologist Community needs to read the Hindu and Mayan Cosmology books to get a better understanding of what the universe is. E.G-Right now, we are a the year 50 something of Krishna's evolving life cycle, and when the cosmologists read and depict the Krishna's Life Evolving Cycle system they will arrive to this- Time never starts and never ends, so is the Universe.......

@IsabelEglitis 21 сағат бұрын

Thank you for confirming the truth!!

@HoTrEtArDeDcHiXx Күн бұрын

According to this theory the universe it absolutely binary and we have twice as much time 🤯

@jimcameron7846 21 сағат бұрын

ok, what we call existence is endless. cyclical. time is our invention to explain change. the universe is seeking balance. but change throws everything off. even if we hold still, everything, including our bodies, don't. we keep looking for natural laws. there is only one. imbalance.

@tomahawkskipper Күн бұрын

Astrophysicist always invent imaginary answers. So far they been always wrong.

@68chewy Күн бұрын

Always? Definitely not. But they do strive to prove themselves wrong. Unlike the religious nuts, who accept demonstrably false ancient mythology as the only answer.

@p0k314COM 6 сағат бұрын

These are all lies. Every single one. And the thickest is Eistein's gibberish. But it's still nothing compared to the scale of the mendacious history.

@davidfalconer8913 10 сағат бұрын

( Some of us ? ) suspected this , for decades 😝 .... but , where do we go from here ( ? ) ......... DAVE™🛑

@reygranado1229 Күн бұрын

NO ! 👽

@mickdonedee1 17 сағат бұрын

When are we going to stop speculating about the formation of the universe? Every new telescope shows images that contradict our assumptions from the previous telescope. It's like climbing a hill to see whats on the other side. If expectations are not met, we climb the next hill hoping to find a consistent geography. But the terrain keeps changing and we're no closer to finding an answer to end our speculations.