I like this gentleman’s attitude. I’ve been a mechanic (non-aircraft) for 43 years. The simplicity and proven reliability of these engines should be taken note of. Fewer moving parts means fewer areas of failure.
@cptzoomАй бұрын
Great video!! As a DAR I have certified several planes with William’s engines on them. I’ve been very impressed with them.
@avmechllcАй бұрын
I was fortunate enough to fly Williams Pietenpol back in 1999-2000. This was in his early years of corvair conversions. The engine ran flawlessly all the way to Oshkosh and back to Florida. I also flew it to the Kansas City area and back with zero issues. Now, all these years later, his product has improved by orders of magnitude and ranks among the very best engine options in the mid 100 hp range. There is no one on this planet the remotely comes close to the depth of knowledge that William has about these engines. If you follow his instructions, you will have a great, reliable and well running engine.
@avmech2126Ай бұрын
50 years in aviation (A&P/IA, EAA member), started working on Corvairs about 60 years ago (wish I still had at least one), I love what William is doing with these engines. Hopefully make it to Sun and Fun next year and meet up with him 👍
@GaryBootheАй бұрын
Great job! My William Wynne Corvair powered Pietenpol has been flying for over 10 years!
@BillyStewart-r9dАй бұрын
I have a Zenith 601XLB and I've run both the 2.7L and later the 3.3L engines. I installed them according to William's installation manual and both were great trouble-free engines. I'm up to around 400 hours on the plane now.
@steve2736Ай бұрын
30:06 Absolutely positively true. His knowledge and experience are irreplaceable.
@SmokinJoesAdventuringАй бұрын
The Corvair is a proven engine and William Wynn's knowledge of its adaptation to aircraft use is invaluable.
@travisbouton4056Ай бұрын
Now I really wanna go learn about those engines. From that guy. I remember shop class. Work with my hands. So chose family over being moneyed. Lol. They did built thing better back than. Thanks.
@scottmiller4711Ай бұрын
Very informative video...
@PghGameFixАй бұрын
Been waiting for this one !!
@gokartmozart1567Ай бұрын
I have a corvair engine in my building ready to be converted :)
@scoot77777Ай бұрын
Very nicely done✅😊🇺🇸 Thank you 🙏
@Rio_SecoАй бұрын
Great option for airplanes that fly on 100hp. A lot to like about a carbureted smooth running 6 cylinder boxer, with a very long history in aviation.
@ddok172Ай бұрын
The reason I chose the WW Corvair flight engine is because of WW culture of no nonsense safety. Oh, and they sound awesome too!
@dgardea11Ай бұрын
Great video Bryan! I love my 2700 Corvair that I built using William’s excellent manuals and his high quality components. It has over 660 hours in my Zenith CH650, runs beautifully, and provides great performance. One day when this retiree needs another project I’ll likely upgrade it to the 2850.
@timk3225Ай бұрын
Love my Corvair power .. had a 2700 .. the original builder put 250 hr's on it the 10 years he owned it ..... I've had mine for 3 years and have put 350 trouble free, non oil burning or oil leaking hours on it ... I have recently swapped that motor ... for a 3L built for me by William.. not because there was anything wrong with the 2.7L .. but cause I had " the need for speeeeeeed" .. picked up about 12-15 knts with the swap .. cant say enough good things about it .. I use mine as a taxi from N of Boston to the Jersey shore 2-3 times a month .. down the Hudson river route .. or over JFK .. actually looking for a KR2 or similar slippery airframe to put another corvair into (love my zenith ... but its a cinderblock as far as aerodynamics)
@davejohnson7678Ай бұрын
Right on Rudebaega.
@jiyushugi1085Ай бұрын
Honda Superhawk! 305 Dream rider here.
@captarmourАй бұрын
Great video! Any turbocharged Corvairs? How much boost can they take before destruction?
@Joe_LeisingАй бұрын
It is my understanding that development of a turbo system is part of the driving force behind the demonstrator airframe
@brianl7695Ай бұрын
Please do AeroMomentum next.
@jiyushugi1085Ай бұрын
NGK CR9NEK is a tiny 10mm plug that can be used for dual-plug setups where space is an issue. These plugs were widely used by Japan's gamble racers in their highly tuned Triumph motorcycle engines.
@zenvairpilotАй бұрын
No need on this engine. I have been flying mine for over 400 hours. It does have a dual ignition system just not dual plugs. The plugs are resistant to lead fouling due to a large gap in the electrode and a very high voltage spark as compared to magneto systems.
@oltimer5544Ай бұрын
Is that a Honda 300 Super Hawk from the mid-sixties parked in the background? I was in high school in the early/mid-sixties when the Honda craze hit ("Go little Honda, Go little Honda, you meet the nicest people on a Honda!"). Me and all my high school buddies bought Honda bikes and road all over the streets of Raleigh< NC. I had a Super 90, then a CB 160, and then a CL 450. The Super Hawk was the top of the line early on before the the CB 350's came out.
@Антоха-ь2кАй бұрын
👏👏👏👏👍👍
@crawford323Ай бұрын
What about a power take off to spin a pre- rotator for gyro planes?
@djal1030Ай бұрын
waiting to see the Aeromomentum. Specifically the AeroMomentum AM15 HP that claims 147hp.
@stevenwarner7348Ай бұрын
A hem.... Errrr.... I have a Suzuki Bandit. 1998 1200. Maybe this guy would be willing to comment on motorcycles? Hmmm? Course with that one carburetor no syncing needed. Gonna take on those four carburetors this winter. Oh well. An engine is an engine is an engine. But all this is such an inspiration. Wow. Just Great! Thanks so much for this. Those pipe welds. Woooo Weee.
@joseeduardo998Ай бұрын
If it wasn't too much to ask, create a channel in Portuguese. Use AI to do the dubbing!
@jpdurrАй бұрын
While it may be against Mr. Wynne's advice, there are many who would like an EFI / FADEC option for this great engine. It's 2025. It can and should be done. I say only as an OPTION for those who want it. Nobody would be required to buy it or use it.
@zenvairpilotАй бұрын
not worth the complexity. the value of the engine is in its simplicity.
@jpdurrАй бұрын
@@zenvairpilot Not worth it to me without FADEC. To each his own. I said to make it an OPTION. I would value it with that OPTION.
@sjsz06Ай бұрын
Blah.blah,blah…. Quit talking and show us the plane, or engine.
@brentdykgraaf184Ай бұрын
Corsair. Have mixed emotions. Corvairs leak. Always have. Can make good power.. leaks were normal in the 60,s. Had to put my restoration 1966 corsair monza convertible . Dual ig ition would make me feel better. New seal materials would be better. Than cork.
@lesizmor9079Ай бұрын
You are correct that Corvair engines all leaked. But it appears that you don't know details, and details are how problems get fixed. It was the push rod tube ends that leaked, and that problem was fixed by Corvair rebuilders long ago. Are you thinking this guy has had a steady business for 35 years from selling engines that leak in 6 months?
@zenvairpilotАй бұрын
I've been flying mine for almost 7 years. I don't have any issues with the leaks. It does have a dual ignition built into the distributor. There is a electronic ignition module and a points set up. They are easily swapped inflight by using a coil changer and 2 ignition coils. The points are retarded 2 degrees from the electronic module making starting easier, and in case of detonation a simple way to stop it. They only use one plug per cylinder, but the high voltage of the spark minimizes lead fowling. Been a great engine to fly behind.
@vr6chrisvwАй бұрын
I recently flew my Corvair powered airplane 12.1 hours in one day from Illinios back home to California. You know what I wasn't thinking about when I was flying over the Rocky mountains? The answer is oil, because if you build it right, it doesn't leak or consume any.
probably best you logged off, you already know more than the guy that's been doing it 35 years so it's unlikely you could learn anything.
@zenvairpilotАй бұрын
The carb is a perfectly airworthy product. I have a Marvel Schebler MA3-SPA on mine right now but will be changing over to the Rotec. Less moving parts. Fewer failure modes. The MA3-SPA is a great carb, but I prefer the simplicity of the ROTEC moving forward.
@Wingwalker77Ай бұрын
I mean, if you already know everything, why were you logged on to begin with?