Like the details of the video. As an architect in California, the engineer won't let us use Zip R because of the sheer value. By having the foam against the stud, you lose much of the shear strength. I prefer to go with a Rockwool that is vapor open, possibility of more insulation (2x4 wall but more on the outside) and the added fire resistance. Food for thought. Many ways to do.
@KDreezyАй бұрын
Or you can use the zip r but once electrical is done and you insulate you just sheath the inside of the wall before drywall. Not sure about cali codes but most places allow that or a strong wall periodically.
@snookluvr2913Ай бұрын
As a retired PE, I really appreciate your attention to detail. Good collaboration with Steve. Keep up the excellent work!!
@ceterisparibus516 ай бұрын
I recently built a house (my own), and fabricated my own "ZIP-R" panels on site. It was really easy -- just hit each 7/16 ZIP sheathing panel with a shot of Advantech subfloor foam glue on each corner, and one in the middle. Then slapped a sheet of 1" XPS foam onto it. Let each panel set up for about 1 hour. The Advantech glue bonds the two layers like cement, and this saved quite a bit of money as compared to purchasing the ZIP-R panels from Huber. All you really need is enough glue to hold the two layers together until the panel is installed.
@KevinLauscher6 ай бұрын
sweet tip!
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
I would be surprised if you any AHJ allowed an amalgamation like that since there is no testing of the assembly as required by code for approval
@ceterisparibus516 ай бұрын
@@AwesomeFramers Probably right about that. But my inspector didn't fuss over this. Yet it's hard to see what difference the assembly process could make??? I don't think the foam board adds anything to the structural integrity of the panels (while also not detracting significantly). And so long as you attach the sheathing itself according to Huber specs, this just counts as another layer of insulation. Or? Am I missing something? (and thanks for you feedback!). I'd be more worried with thicker poly iso boards -- e.g., 2" or greater.
@braydonscully46466 ай бұрын
@@ceterisparibus51it for sure works, it’s just not code stamped or listed as engineered and tested. So depending on where you live it may be a total no go.
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
@@ceterisparibus51 With Zip R you get warranty, and testing that is submitted to the code. You no longer have the warranty when you modify the use of the panel outside of the installation instructions. Will you actually have a probably? Likely not, but there's nothing to back you up if there is a problem. I've been to the see Huber's racking testing personally, its worth using the suite of products and being covered.
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
CORRECTION: Continuous insulation is NOT the only way to meet the new energy code in WA state. It is the simplest in our opinion as builders (our company). Continuous insulation in the form of Zip R sheathing is the most cost effective way for us to meet the requirements. It lowers labor cost, requires less training, and is more efficient that other methods.
@lucascole75896 ай бұрын
I was talking with a local architect who has an in-house engineer and they mentioned using WSU's "C3 Calculator" to go around the continuous insulation requirement, but I haven't read into that much. I would like to use ZIP R6.6 but it's quite expensive where I live in Pierce County.
@Braindead1546 ай бұрын
@@lucascole7589basically - show that your entire building thermal envelope has a UA less than target UA (UAT). From what I’ve seen and worked on, continuous insulation is not required at all to meet the target UA. There are more cost effective ways to meet these requirements. I’m not discounting what these guys are doing, ZIP-R is a fantastic product. It is however cost prohibitive and generally unnecessary when using the alternative method outlined in R204.1.4
@FreeYourBrains5 ай бұрын
Continuous insulation yeah right, how about glue and screw the OSB to the studs and after that glue sheets of styrofoam overlapping the OSB seams? You gonna say NO IS NOT CODE, just buy this ones. Aha how much are they paying you to throw your honesty and integrity in the garbage? You know I’m right. How about teaching people how to use materials that are not destroying their bank account?
@1truthseeking8Ай бұрын
So you're saying foam board and OSB purchased separately with ? tyvek ? Or ? Is going to be significantly cheaper AND perform nearly the same? I am not experienced as may be necessary to grasp this without asking...
@emwagner2 ай бұрын
I never thought about going from a California corner to a channel to ensure enough backing in corners. It absolutely makes perfect sense!
@franklong62696 ай бұрын
I am a licensed GC in AZ and a Civil Engineer who has done structural engineering. In AZ, we are concerned about the heat, not the cold and that is what we insulate homes here to protect them. I have installed several 2" x 6" framed homes that are stuccoed, and they are exceptionally energy efficient. Now, with stucco, you do have a 1.5" insulating board installed under the stucco. So there is, in a sense, a continuous insulation barrier, but it's like R-2, so it's not much. I am a big fan of the Zip system, but the continuous insulation system you are specifying is expensive. It would be interesting to see the insulation difference between a standard 2" x 6" framed home with non-insulated Zip shear panel and the R-9 Zip you are using. I am betting that the actual difference would not be that great. I think you are quickly coming to the point of diminishing returns, where you are just burning money. However, in Washington, where it does get very cold, it may actually be worth the additional money to pay for the insulated Zip board in extreme weather conditions. While I am not a cold-climate expert, I am very skeptical about the numbers this "architect" spouted off for cold transferring over five inches through 2" x 6" wood studs. Yes wood has a low R-Factor compared to insulation, but you have to consider the thickness of the wood framing members when doing these calculations. I don't think this architect understands that. The continuous insulation barrier system is better, no doubt. And both heat and cold will transfer through wood. But it is the AMOUNT of transfer that we have to be concerned about. Saying that an R-21 2" x 6" insulated wall system is "R-9" if it doesn't have a continuous insulation system is complete BS - he doesn't know what he's talking about. The R-Factor of wall systems is measured as a complete system, and that is where the R-21 number comes from. It would be blatantly illegal to promise an R-21 insulation factor with a 2" x 6" clad wall system and deliver an R-9 insulation factor - it would be fraud. In AZ, a stuccoed 2" x 6" wall system with fiberglass batt insulation and 2" foam under the stucco is nearly R-30, and they are VERY energy efficient. I know because I have built dozens of them, and they just work, provided they are installed correctly. During the summer, we get temperatures that range from 110 degrees F - 120 degrees F for several weeks in a row. At night sometimes the temperature does not get below 95 degrees F. So these conditions are about as extreme as you are going to find anywhere. Insulation is a big deal here because, without it, your home becomes unlivable in the summer. BTW, no one installs double sills here in AZ, no one. Your guest really doesn't have a clue about national construction methods. I have framed structures in several countries, and nobody uses double sills. There's nothing wrong with using double sill plates, but you can attach shear panels to walls with single sill plates. Further if your double bottom plates are not both attached to the concrete with J-bolts or redheads, then your structure does not meet code PERIOD! It is possible in extreme cold that using double bottom plates arose to provide additional insulation against the frost line reaching into the home from the ground. Finally, while your structural engineer is correct, and you do get some limited shear value using the R-9 Zip panels, it is nowhere near as strong as a regular shear panel that is nailed 4" O.C. This won't matter if you are in zones that don't have hurricanes, high wind events, earthquakes or tornadoes. But if you are in one of these zones, the inherent weakness of the R-9 Zip shear panel may become a factor and the home could fail. I have never run the calcs on the difference between standard, non-insulated, shear and the R-9 Zip, but I would bet the R-9 is at least 50% -75% weaker in catastrophic storm events than standard shear panel. Standard shear panel has been proven to hold a house together in 200 mph winds, hurricanes and tornados and I personally would not lose that level of protection if the home I was constructing was in a high-risk area. Being cock-sure that you are right, like this architect who is your guest, doesn't make him right. Just because a structural engineer said it was okay in one application doesn't mean it is the best system for all applications. In short, if the home was in a high-risk area and I wanted to install Zip R-9 panels, I would shear the exterior of the walls normally and then install the R-9 Zip over that shear.
@LateForDinner-mn1hn6 ай бұрын
I drove my builder/framer crazy with all your videos I would share with him because I wanted him to know what quality of framing I expected. In the end, I didn’t get quite as good as I wanted but I got much better quality than the big developers offered in our area. We ended up with a very well insulated house with an ACH of 0.6 and once the house was insulated, before drywall, I could get the interior temperature to +7°C with two 1500 W space heaters when the outside winter temperatures were -27°C. Thanks to your videos I have an exceptionally good quality home because I learned what good quality framing and homes should look like.
@franklong62696 ай бұрын
I was a professional framer for years and you are very misinformed. Your framer and your GC are not responsible to design your home insulation systems. I am a licensed GC now and I have a Civil Engineering degree, so for my clients, I sometimes do design work. But a framer is not qualified to design your insulation system, nor are they trained to do so. "Builders" as you call them, probably refer to your GC. Generally, it is not the GC's responsibility to do design work, depending on the size of the project. For custom homes, it is the homeowner's responsibility to provide permitted design plans to the GC unless you make arrangements with the GC to pay him for that service. But a LOT of GCs are not trained in home design and insulation systems. So you were trying to get design service for free from your GC and it sounds like you didn't pay him for that service. You should know that the GC is required to build any structure strictly in compliance with the permit plans. He is not responsible, nor should he, build your home according to your personal quirks and superstitions. It sounds like there were a lot of insulation details that you demanded that were not communicated in writing to the GC BEFORE he bid on the project. So, he should have changed-ordered you for each one of the insulation details that you demanded in the name of "quality." You can't pay for Toyota Camry and expect your builder to construct a Lexus under the same budget. Competent GCs who know what they are doing will often avoid clients like you because you are petulantly demanding quality that you did not specify in the original design and you didn't pay for. BY FAR, most heat and cool loss is transferred through the windows. So if you cheaped out on the windows, then all of the insulation details you add to the walls and roof won't make much difference. And the "builder" doesn't usually choose your windows for you unless, again, you pay him to design your entire insulation system. Showing "videos" to your builder and demanding that "quality" level is only appropriate BEFORE he bid the home out or if you are willing to pay for changes that were not in the original scope that was defined for the project. For example, it makes a HUGE difference to frame a home with 2" x 6" lumber as opposed to 2" x 4" lumber. But it costs more labor and materials to use 2" x 6" lumber because it is much heavier and harder to erect. If you didn't ask for 2" x 6" framing when the home was bid out, then you should be willing to pay for the upgrade that you have ordered.
@LateForDinner-mn1hn6 ай бұрын
@@franklong6269 Wow, you are certainly assuming quite a lot from the short amount of information that I wrote. Like I said, the framing was better than other builders work that I’ve seen but there were some things that had to be fixed/changed because someone was in a rush or just made a mistake. I’m not going into details because that’s not important since the project is complete and the house is built better than the previous house that existed on the foundation. I’m going to repeat myself here, watching these videos helped my project to be better built than most of the new builds that I have seen in the past few years. And the ZipR6 helped to get both the insulation and air leakage to a level that most of the local developers in my area aren’t doing. Design, drawings, engineering, permits, etc were all done professionally btw.
@LateForDinner-mn1hn6 ай бұрын
@@franklong6269 Did I mention what lumber dimension the wall assembly was? I didn’t. Actually it was double stud 2x4 with a 1” gap between the walls. The builder knew exactly what was expected before he took the job because I made sure to be very clear and upfront with the plans. Hence the sharing of the videos with details that I particularly wanted because the intention was to get to Net Zero with some passive house standards. There were some mistakes made but most got corrected and some I’ll have to forgive, like the post imbedded in concrete by the staircase that’s 4” off from the blueprint indication. But overall, it’s a very good house, thanks to the things that were learned from watching videos like Awesome Framers. Roll the tape!
@franklong62696 ай бұрын
If you paid for the changes, then it should not have "driven your builder crazy." If your plans were done correctly, it should not have "driven your builder crazy." That's not being presumptuous, those are your own words. Nothing is wrong with what you want. The quality you wanted was a smart choice. And sometimes, many times, architects do a very poor job in designing various wall systems. My point is none of this was your GC's fault or your framer's fault. They are not licensed to design homes, though GCs do have some design responsibility based on code requirements. I have come to expect that when clients bring me a set of plans for a custom home, I will have to spend significant time fixing those plans because there are almost always important "omissions" and "errors." For example, I had one client that I built an addition for. They had hired an architect and he made two critical errors in his plans. With the first error, he specified a roof height that was wrong. It was wrong because the peak height of the roof trusses on the addition had to match the peak height of roof on the existing home or the entire roof system would not work. I was about to order the trusses for the project, and I took some time to double-check the dimensions that the architect provided. Had I used his dimensions, the additional roof would have been 1.5 feet too low, and it would have cost my client thousands of dollars. They would have had to buy the trusses twice because the wrong size trusses would not have been usable. The second error was that the architect put the main door of the house approximately 6 feet away from the correct location. Again, this would have been a massive mistake had I not caught it because this is a stucco home and it would have been a nightmare to move the door after the house was stuccoed. A third mistake was that the client wanted to hang a swinging three-seat exteriror chair off of the addition's patio beam, which was also stuccoed. The structural beam to carry the large chair system was not in the plans. Luckily, when I spoke with them, they told me about the large chair and I reinforced the beam structure before stucco to carry it. I took photos of the framing and the build of the house at different stages and gave them a photo album so they would know where all of the plumbing, the electrical wiring and the structural beams and studs are. A few years later, they tried to hang the swing and they could not find the beam. I came out for free and showed them where it was. I asked them to pull out their photo album and when they checked, I had provided a picture of where the beam was and they had not thought o look in the album. They were older, and so I helped them several times without charging them. After I found so many errors in the architectural plans, I asked my clients if the architect had ever come out to the house and taken measurements for the new addition. I was stunned when they said he had never even come to the house once to check his dimensions. This could have cost them tens of thousands of dollars and this was just an addition, not an entire home. This is an example of things that "drive builders crazy." They are often left to pick up the pieces of a huge mess that they did not create, and the client often tends to blame the builder because they are frustrated and angry. Maybe this small example gives you view into the other side of the real world that your builder lives in.
@LateForDinner-mn1hn6 ай бұрын
@@franklong6269 You misconstrued my comment, I jokingly said that I drove my builder crazy because I sent him videos to explain what the project was about and what was expected. My builder also joked about how I sent him videos, but being in the millennial age group, got the point. Most of the builders in my area don’t build Net Zero projects and aren’t familiar with the products that I specified to use, like the ZipR6 and the tape was totally new to my builder as was the double stud wall but he was willing to learn, so he assured me. In the circle of people in my area that are building Net Zero projects, the consensus is that not enough builders are interested in learning about products and methods that will achieve the standards. Like I previously said, I didn’t get quite as good as I wanted but I got better than the usual house construction that is common in developments in my area.
@drumswest50356 ай бұрын
Great to see a framer concerned about structural integrity of a building. So many homes ive inspected have that missing. We are in a high seismic zone also and there is a lot to consider when framing a house, shearwalls, hold downs, species of lumber etc.
@FreeYourBrains5 ай бұрын
@@drumswest5035 what exactly are you talking about? The OSB in modern times and 1” thick lumber boards back in the day are basically installed to give structural integrity to the studs walls which without that would be like a sheet of paper. The styrofoam glued between the studs and the OSB completely defeats that purpose. Next time you go to chance your tires bring some rubber spacers and ask your tire mechanic to place them on the lug bolts before he installs the rims. After that tell me how many miles you drive before everything breaks apart. The same thing happens if you don’t secure the OSB directly to the studs.
@drumswest50355 ай бұрын
@@FreeYourBrains I totally agree with what you said, i was just stating the fact that he is aware of the structural aspect of building. We never use styrofoam board anywhere in our engineered designs either as a lot of these new exterior type boards that keep cropping up are not proven with time. We always state to nail directly to the studs with proper nail spacing and nail diameter for shearwalls and if the engineer need more strength we go with D. fir plywood or add sheathing to both sides.
@Braindead1546 ай бұрын
Love to see you building with Steve and love these videos.
@caustinolino36874 ай бұрын
10:29 Stupid question- why not saw off the panels at 45 degrees to meet at the corner like is done with most stuff on corners?
@felixtrudel85655 ай бұрын
One of my concern with zip R and other equivalent products is the rigidity of the wall. I may be wrong but the role of the sheating is to provide rigidity to the wall in case of high wind, by creating a space between the studs and the sheating, the nails have more wiggle room and i have doubt about the wall being has rigid... But maybe i am wrong... I still went with a separate continuous insulation even if it meant a little bit more labour
@AwesomeFramers5 ай бұрын
We addressed that in the video. The Zip panel is a Struc 1 panel and there are shear nail tables for it 👍👍
@fredtaylor29186 ай бұрын
11:48 would it just be cheaper/faster to use a 2x8 instead of a extra stud?
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
Probably, but we don't order 10' 2x8 and cut them then down to stud length. I think by the time I factor in my time doing that it might be a wash just to grab a stud
@Dsanrides6 ай бұрын
Increased sheathing costs. Increased ventilation costs. Increased maintenance costs on sophisticated air exchange units. Increased labor cost on HVAC. All in the name of saving $30 a month on energy bills.😂 In Western Washington, which has an extremely mild climate. I had my windows open 24/7, 365 when I lived there. Meanwhile, here in NC, we have brutal humid summers and actual winters and all we need is 2x4s with batts. 🤷♂️
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
I totally understand your points. I do think though, that this is too narrow a view. We gain a lot of benefits from going with CI and high performance windows. We'll do a cost breakdown in another video. We were able to reduce the HVAC equipment. We view CI as part of the mechanical system, even though it isn't. Viewing the structure is a holistic approach for us. We get a more comfortable building, a quieter building, more efficient building, have filtered air and our homes have much lower maintenance than our competitors.
@ceterisparibus516 ай бұрын
I used ZIP-R on my house. I'm convinced it's worth the cost/effort, but introduces several complications. Among the most costly are custom window and door jambs.
@stevenbaczekarchitect94316 ай бұрын
It's not at all about hot or cold......it's about if you buy energy?
@lucascole75896 ай бұрын
@@ceterisparibus51 I'm in the planning phase right now and will likely be forced into using ZIP R6.6. Two questions, why would windows need custom jambs? Did you just add 1" to the exterior door jambs? I'm mostly worried about a custom jamb for the 144"x96" patio door....
@ceterisparibus516 ай бұрын
@@lucascole7589 Just to be clear, I am not a pro builder/carpenter. But a standard window/door jamb for a nominal 2x6 wall is *6 7/16"* deep (i.e., "standard" in the sense of not typically requiring a custom order). A typical ZIP-R6 wall will be *7 7/16"* deep (5 1/2" for the stud + 1" for the foam board + 7/16" sheathing + 1/2" interior drywall).
@RossHotchkiss6 ай бұрын
Timely video! All the builders and suppliers in our area are scrambling for CI solutions right now (although we knew it was coming for over a year). Naturally, everyone thinks their pet idea is the exact right way to do it. I'm kind of liking the ZIP system - fenestration flashing is a lot simpler vs trying to flash a furred-out RO.
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
There are a lot of benefits. Truthfully, if we could find a better way to do it, we would. This is the simplest and lowest cost we've found.
@samuelwotring6335 ай бұрын
I'd like to apologize I looked at the video One More Time and saw at the beginning that you did do that the measurement from the outside and determined the layout my apologies but it did get me thinking how to layout a building in this day and age rather than how I was taught 50 years ago thank you again
@ElvargsBane6 ай бұрын
One question: do you roll the tape?
@CPK0076 ай бұрын
What is with the gap between panels? Love Steve!
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
Insulation should be tight, panel gapped. You can see it when I was nailing the panel. I should have mentioned that.
@stevenbaczekarchitect94316 ай бұрын
Thank you!!!!
@WB-zr7pq4 ай бұрын
Do you ever share your sketchup resources for your layouts? I love seeing the zip system previz and accurate architecture files being used in tandem with your builds. Someone actually checking the details while framing is so reassuring.
@BWIL25156 ай бұрын
Building has changed a lot from when I started in the early seventies i always thought that we should have been using a weather resistant tape I've found duct tape and other stuff on demo's this system now is what i always thought should have been easy to get. Thanks
@TrytoCatch226 ай бұрын
@12:00 you talk about having the 3rd stud for nailing of the sheathing. Is the 2nd (flat) stud used for structural purposes or just for nailing for the sheathing? Instead of using the 3rd normal facing stud for sheathing, could you slide over the "flat" stud and save yourself a stud piece? Amateur here to learn, thanks
@greeboart6 ай бұрын
I had understood that, in the Pacific Northwest, walls needed to dry to the outside. How is this possible with the Zip-R panels?
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
Through the drywall
@44godson6 ай бұрын
Great information on the use of these panels and the energy conservation involved. I will rewatch just to reinforce my understanding. Great video
@stevenbaczekarchitect94316 ай бұрын
Thank you for joining in
@samuelwotring6335 ай бұрын
I want to give a comment I appreciate you talking about when you're framing you need to consider what's going on the outside for as plywood's insulation or whatever is the next framer actually Carpenter journeyman that is I think that you should have used a 2X for the corner and then you wouldn't have a wasted 2 by 4 so you gave me great thought in the next time I frame and make sure I have Corner nailing from the outside of my insulation so my walls would probably be laid out differently to instead of the normal pull on the tape for 12 or 24 in on Center I have to consider what my outside installation was going to be and where is it going to be extended paneling so is for nailing purposes that way you wouldn't be wasting exterior sheathing and insulation board being 4 x 8 sheets normally? Just a thought four framing
@ArthurDentZaphodBeeb6 ай бұрын
Really nice to see you up your game wrt efficiency. Good to see Steve on the job.
@stevenbaczekarchitect94316 ай бұрын
Thank you, always great to hang out with Tim
@24revealer6 ай бұрын
I'm in Ontario, Canada and was looking into this sheathing. They told me my local dealer was a Rona about an hour away, so I took a trip as I wanted to see what this sheathing was all about. They did not have any, said they could order it and then the salesman tried to sell me on a ICF system. That's what I was thinking of doing anyway, but wanted to see if I could use Zip on other parts of the house. LOL
@FreeYourBrains5 ай бұрын
Too much money for just OSB and styrofoam
@jimmyt85356 ай бұрын
Wouldn’t it make sense to install on the inside of exterior walls behind internal linings? Your heat source is inside thus removing the fact you will require more energy to heat framing etc if on the outside?
@jamesbradley37556 ай бұрын
Do you guys use ring shank nails for framing, floor and roof sheathing… 16d to 8d nails?
@fullrestoration82056 ай бұрын
If you use floor or roof trusses, and you want your studs to line out for siding purposes, then layout needs to be thought through and addressed with the truss manufacture during the planning stages because otherwise you’ll waste a ton of zip sheathing trying to get the proper overlaps on your corners.
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
Good points. Preplanning is so important.
@eliinthewolverinestate67294 ай бұрын
Use some zip around windows and doors for thermal break. Windows and doors closer to inside helps too. Less cooler space from window on inside. Then can put shutters on for those in the cold areas or need bear protection on windows.
@lanceodell80586 ай бұрын
Love the game graphics, that flash tool looks like a composite carpet tuck tool.
@ryanduncan208912 күн бұрын
For the Siga Fentrum tape, how does it attach to a brick formed poured concrete foundation? That is what all the foundation contractors use in our area. I feel like there would be too many air gaps and creases with the tape
@user9900776 ай бұрын
The architect has a classic flat top hair cut. When I was a kid in the late 50's early 60's we loved getting flattops for the new school year. Plus some of our astronaut heroes had flat tops too. We had these giant chap stick type holders that had this sticky wax you would put in your hair do you could make it stand up properly. Dust and bugs took up residence I'm sure.
@stevenbaczekarchitect94316 ай бұрын
Had it since Parris Island '84
@DontAatMe4 ай бұрын
I used this zip system to frame my brothers house about a year ago. Except the foam was 2" instead of 1" as seen in this video. It requiered 4" nails to fasten the sheathing to the studs. Im really not a fan of this because the shear value is significantly diminished. You shouldnt have to comprimise on structural integrity to achieve a slightly higher r value. If I had to use this product again, I would probably install cross bracing in the walls for additional support. This would just add more cost to the already higher cost of the project. And people will complain even more about why houses are so expensive 🤦♂️🤷♂️
@AwesomeFramers4 ай бұрын
I hear what you are saying, but there is a larger story to this. First of all, did you NEED the R9 product? It important to remember that more isn't always better. In our climate zone, code requires R5 here. We can get the lateral resistance from the R6 panel nearly all the time here in seismic zone D2. Zip R6 is the lowest total installed cost to meet the new energy code here.
@mikecardenas23645 ай бұрын
Thanks for the great content you are always putting out! Do you have any video of setting doors with Zip R-6? Thanks and God bless!!
@AwesomeFramers5 ай бұрын
No I don't, but next time I'll show it. Basically frame the opening 1 1/2" bigger all the way around then add 2x ripped to match the wall depth.
@mikecardenas23644 ай бұрын
Sounds good look forward to seeing it next time. Thanks for the info on how to get it done.
@devonstjohn5 ай бұрын
Could you not get the same result or better using SIP panels ?? I am curious why you would not use that instead?
@Roninbuilt3 ай бұрын
Because he’s sponsored by Zip.
@ryansoo40006 ай бұрын
The number of concerns people have with shear values and ZIP R seems to increase as the foam gets thicker between the OSB and the studs. What if you just added diagonal metal bracing straps to the studs for extra shear resistance when using ZIP-R thicker than R6? And as an aside, the Godfather of Forensic Building Science, Dr. Joe Lstiburek, once said of ZIP-R: "Good luck achieving shear values with that" - I don't think he was a fan.
@KimOlsenKTO6 ай бұрын
Newbie question here, shouldn't the sheathing panels be installed horizontally as opposed to vertically to help in preventing the framing structure from racking side to side? (IE: being able to attache the panel across 8' vs the 4' if attached vertically). I hope the question makes sense. I only ask because I spent a couple years in the mid eighties framing houses and I remember that it was code at that point in Alberta and also when I moved to BC shortly after.
@petersallay52216 ай бұрын
In our market builders are applying EFIS directly onto ZIP without a crinkle wrap or drainage wrap. I checked Huber’s technical specs and that is in fact shown in an image as an approved method of applying EFIS. Isn’t that asking for potential water penetration when the caulking between the EFIS and window ultimately fails? I wouldn’t think that there is much drying potential for the ZIP in this case.
@kelvinp78996 ай бұрын
Maybe I missed it, but with Zip R sheathing, do you now eliminate the interior vapor barrie in Northern zones?
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
I don't know.
@LateForDinner-mn1hn6 ай бұрын
North of 50 here, we still used interior vapour barrier on our double stud walls with exterior Zip R6 sheathing as recommended by the experienced insulation contractor we hired to install Rockwool against the exterior Zip R6 and blown in cellulose between that and the drywall. Worked great when the temperature dipped below -40°C.
@hammertime73496 ай бұрын
That’s exactly my question. Here in Wisconsin we are required to use a vapor barrier.
@chrisgeary46246 ай бұрын
Isn’t a Zip-R panel just half a (skinny) SIP panel?
@hpw596 ай бұрын
I always put my fascia on before raising the wall and would toenail rafter tails to back side of subfascia of course making sure it was straight first.
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
We add the fascia after the tails are on, but prebuild the soffit.
@philhensley59865 ай бұрын
A lot of people still ignore the energy savings methods available today. They typically want to spend more on the interior and opt to go cheap on improving the thermal envelope
@tad39004 ай бұрын
how does external insulation affect the lateral loading for seismic or wind? Like with the zip r having that half to inch and a half space between the sheathing and the stud allow the nail to wiggle. Okay, I spoke too soon. Really great video.
@jolookstothestars63586 ай бұрын
Will you be nailing the siding into studs ? If yes is there going to be enough nail penetration into studs? I guess if you use 3" glv. nails. But then there is window and door trim.
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
No, www.apawood.org/nail-base-sheathing and we use the Paslode TetraGrip studless nailer for a lot of siding.
@hu5tle-6 ай бұрын
Can also use the Stretch Tape. I haven't done the CBA on Stretch, VS. 3" VS 6".
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
I don't see the advantage of the Stretch in this application. It would be tough to work with, most expensive and Huber warranty covers the 2 seam tape or 1 6". Let me know how it goes :-)
@hu5tle-6 ай бұрын
@@AwesomeFramers the only advantage is one less "trip" vs the 3"
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
@@hu5tle- 3? With the 6" its 1 and with the seam tape its 1 that takes a little longer. Maybe I'm missing your application. I can bring 2 rolls of seam tape up the ladder and work down using both before climbing off. The 6" is super easy. Stretch is very hard to work with and slower/more expensive for corners because of how well is stretches.
@hu5tle-6 ай бұрын
@@AwesomeFramers yes, less up and down the ladder with the 6", vs. 2x with the 3". Seems like, for good reason, you want to minimize trips up and down ladders.
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
@@hu5tle- thing is, ladder work = giant calves
@francoisbouvier78616 ай бұрын
What is the integrity of the sheer portion of this sheathing product? Likely fastening with 2 1/2 nails? The sheer can't be equal to a conventional sheathing material.
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
I addressed that in the video. For the R6 we need to shoot a 3" minimum nail for shear. www.huberwood.com/uploads/documents/technical/Code-Recognition-in-High-Seismic-for-Insulated-ZIP-System-R-sheathing-ER-0482.pdf
@glengeorge75555 ай бұрын
What about shear? The sheathing is not directly tied to the framing, as the 1" insulation is between the framing and sheathing.
@approots4 ай бұрын
Didn't see you address the wall condensation issue with Zip (where the vapour barrier is on the outside of the wall) in cold highly humid zones (like Washington State). I'm wary of any sealed panel system in that climate.
@AwesomeFramers4 ай бұрын
I didn't address any of the climate zones. The scope of this video is mosty about what the product is, how to install it and why we use it. It is not a deep dive into the different climate zones or potential issues. In our climate zone here in WA, 4 & 5C, there aren't condesation issues following the construction shown in this video.
@approots4 ай бұрын
@@AwesomeFramersI'm close in coastal BC. It's just that Steve discusses the advantages, but not so much the disadvantages or what climate zones it's best. Also, going for more than R6 might not just be a cost issue if you consider it might eliminate wall condensation. I think in our climate, the standard interior poly vapour barrier and zip (no cavity drying) might not mix. I haven't found any long term studies having moisture sensors in the wall for zip systems with a variety of vapour barriers.
@AwesomeFramers4 ай бұрын
@@approots I hear you. I feel like climate zone gets us close, but its almost still a site specific discussion. Have you tried asking those quesitons over at Green Building Advisor?
@approots4 ай бұрын
@@AwesomeFramers I've read a lot there, and it's great, but without the controlled long-term studies it's all theory and anecdotal experiences. Still looking for solid data.
@mattdouglass64826 ай бұрын
i just have one question…. is there any way to make the house not so close to the neighbors(?) 😂
@kwhatten5 ай бұрын
BUY MORE LAND!
@missulu6 ай бұрын
So when do we get an alternative to the zip system and bring the prices down?
@dovahkindragonborn98276 ай бұрын
you can buy OSB, 1 inch rigid foam panels, and a house wrap ... if you want to save on materials the reason people still use zip-R is it probably costs them more on labor to do it that way or the client is willing to pay more
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
There are a lot of alternatives, all of which have a higher installed cost. This is why we chose this.
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
@@dovahkindragonborn9827 you won't save any money if you buy and install these separately. I've done it, it's much more in labor, a lot more.
@miklostitton79616 ай бұрын
Hi! Why don't you chamfer the sheets at the corners? :) Nick
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
I don't feel its worth the time. Whatever we can do to make all of this simple is my thinking.
@miklostitton79616 ай бұрын
@@AwesomeFramers You're absolutely right, but for a tool shed or a doghouse etc made of leftover sheets would be sickly cool... 😉
@whimpypatrol55032 ай бұрын
My house was built with real quality wood but empty cavities. Like a barn maybe. After considering blown-in insulation or infusion or ripping out the sheetrock and wood panels to sprayfoam or rockwool, I think high utility bills are maybe the better choice. People survived in this hot and even hotter climates and in this house before air conditioning. The cost savings to insulate are questionable. Its expensive either way.
@bibbidi_bobbidi_bacons2 ай бұрын
Would be good idea to own a a fastener business with extended length fasteners
@agsystems82204 ай бұрын
I wouldn't be so worried about the shear strength, as the fact that it is being borne by 1" of nail effectively in free space. The nails have become structural members, not just fasteners. As the building loads change in the wind, they will move, and over time they might creep. Nails are supposed to work by keeping tension between the two elements, and then relying on friction between them for the majority of side loads. That doesn't happen here. I wouldn't trust the longevity of such construction. How long is the warranty? Such a system needs to be 3 layers. It needs a structural layer adjacent to the frame, an insulation layer, and a barrier outer layer. Trying to use the outer layer as structural is asking for trouble. I would guess the primary reason framers object to an inner structural layer is that it is the structural layer which needs to be fastened, and trying to use a nail gun on foam and get a good fastening on the board beneath is going to be a pain. In a controlled environment the solution would be glue, but that is really hard to inspect. I guess you could push the board out and if it stays put then the glue is good enough.
@BirchwoodBill4 ай бұрын
Wish we could use timber screws on ZIP R12
@claystewart76266 ай бұрын
How would tape the zip if it was on the inside of the wall
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
Inside corner? I showed that toward the end.
@arthurc45312 ай бұрын
This made me think I can do this myself!
@jmhall9186 ай бұрын
Oh man I almost fast-forwarded at that Low T joke 😂
@SaerTurner-wn2qh6 ай бұрын
Finaly your using a Router better suited to the job I am shocked the little 1/4 hp cordless even lasted as long as it did ..How you liking the metabo HTP I love mine ..was looking at the Milwaukee because it has the track adaptor but I have my Festool for that but for on the job warranty and durability so Far the Metabo is Boss cheers
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
Metabo HPT is a great router. The little DeWalt is from 2019. If it can route oak, it can route OSB 👍
@ceterisparibus516 ай бұрын
I experienced issues with the foam board gumming up my router bit while cutting out openings (because the heat generated melts the foam). Don't know if this is typical???
@JimDeVerna-yf2zy6 ай бұрын
Great details on framing with Zip R6. Why didn’t you slope the bottom of the widow rough opening? Surprised Steve didn’t say anything.
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
Great question, and I'm going to be blunt. This is a waste of time, it doesn't actually work. We'd rather focus on detailing the siding and windows/doors/roof correctly. There are 10s of 1000s of homes that have no issue with water that would have been mitigated by sloped sills BUT there is zero evidence besides hypothesis that they work. Now I'm specifically talking about the siding we use here in the PNW e.g. fiber cement, SmartSide, cedar, shingles, lap and board on board, etc. We've pulled a lot of siding off old building and found nothing bad that wasn't directly related to crappy installation. As an example of my thinking, when I drive my car inside the garage after being in the rain, I see very little water on the ground. A few hours and its gone, that is with a sloped slab. I know, its not a great example. We will never see enough water past our siding and window that would overcome physics and drain down and out. In fact the ring from my coffee dries quickly and I just clean it up.
@josephstevener74996 ай бұрын
How toxic is that Styrofoam when it catches a fire? And how flammable is it?
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
The polysio has a higher rating than other foam insulation and is above the code threshold for requirements to cover in our code.
@sladeoriginal6 ай бұрын
so efficient no one can afford it
@NealBarber-z8z3 ай бұрын
I like the zip r product and design with it in western washington, but I your mythbusting section is a bit over simplistic. I agree that it is not inherently a problem, but it could present significant issues if someone doesn't get the assembly right or doesnt probably excecute the build. The biggest thing I think you left out os that you cannot install a vapor barrier below sheet rock orherwise you are going to rot out the framing. You also must allocate more time to drying out framing if building during the wet season. Any trapped water will also lead to rot. I think the best assembly with zip-r is to "flash and batt" the cavities with 2" of closed cell and fiberglass batt. The downside is thay this likely removes any labor cost saving from usong the zip-r panel. I am hoping we don't see a bunch of new homes in the region fail as less attentive builders are pushed into the zip-r product by the energy code and cost constraimts.
@user-yi5nu4gw2s6 ай бұрын
Safety first. Remove battery on router when adjusting settings. Cheers
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
excellent point.
@tc91486 ай бұрын
Love it, fantastic best practice details.
@dunckeroo19875 ай бұрын
At 22:09 you can see a nail miss. You need to "plant" the ram straight up and down so it can't skip out of position will the nail is being pushed in.
@greycat54006 ай бұрын
Great video.
@DontAatMe4 ай бұрын
Another thing I didnt like is the way the foam is adhered to the osb. Its just a squiggly line of glue or whatever adhesive. Not full coverage not laminated at all. I suspect this will cause moisture to be trapped between the foam and osb, most likely becoming moldy and eventually rotting away the osb. Not a good product imo
@paulmarc-aurele55086 күн бұрын
When I built my second home zip wasn’t available and I didn’t really trust the siding contractor to install tyvek correctly. I was in the HVAC industry and had the house sheathed with 5/8 plywood and taped it with a mastic tape. I tested several tapes left totally exposed for a year and the mastic held up the best. I used siding with foam attached. As previous comments mentioned social media influencers are usually supported which may or may not be the case here. Zip is a nice solution but not the only way or even the most cost effective way to achieve the same results.
@dweb22752 күн бұрын
@7:50 Miter them corners.
@AwesomeFramers2 күн бұрын
I choose to save that time. We would still have to adjust layout on one side.
@garymitchell7551Ай бұрын
Zip-R is more expensive to use than zip only plus, insulation for materials cost only …. Want to save energy reduce the window square footage throughout the house to improve the overall efficiency
@YIQUANONE5 ай бұрын
What size nails get their shear value to transfer?, also windows are already calculated into new houses with the required T24 report in CA, all this extra insulation is not required but is an extra cost that you will probably never get back in your savings on energy. I like a little fresh air in the house; most people probably don't want to live in a sealed box.
@AwesomeFramers5 ай бұрын
3" x .131" nails as I showed in the video. This house isn't in California. Fresh air? Then open a window, until you hit wild fire season, then the owners will be glad we manage the air instead of letting it coming through a thousand small holes.
@Mrhappy5552 ай бұрын
We were wrapping houses with cheap Styrofoam 20 years ago and they stopped They started using wraps and that wasn’t good behind brick Now they are using more expensive products Go back to cheap styrofoam over plywood
@stevenleiler90346 ай бұрын
Just keeps driving the cost of new homes out of the reach of most people. Last month We got a new house to pass the codes with very little extra effort. No spray foam, no zip, no extra crap. Just read the code book.
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
Did it meet the new energy code in WA? I do feel your pain, ire or whatever we call this feeling. I am just showing how to do it right, but personally I am not in favor of most of these changes due to lack of affordability. I cannot afford to live in the homes I work on. KZbin doesn't pay me enough for that 🤣🤣🤣😪😪
@stevenleiler90346 ай бұрын
@@AwesomeFramers We passed the newest code here in Ct. The builder we frame for doesn't own a hammer but loves to read the code book and do his research. A lot of people and inspectors think there is only one way to get the efficiency, the code book has a lot of either / or. and the people selling zip and spray foam just push their products. We met all requirements and blew away the blower door test. (see what i did there) the company that did the test , did it 3 times because they never seen that kind of a score on a residential home.
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
@@stevenleiler9034 but specifically could you find out which code because a lot of these continuous insulation requirements are just going into effect.
@stevenbaczekarchitect94316 ай бұрын
@@stevenleiler9034 Interesting to hear you tout the blower door test number, but don't actually cite it......must have been soooo good
@Braindead1546 ай бұрын
I’m willing to bet $500 that when this residence is complete, if we did a UA target calculation and compared it to the UA factor of the entire building envelope, R402.1.4 would show that continuous insulation was completely unnecessary to meet code. That’s not to say it’s not a great product. It’s just not required in most cases.
@beemerkon5 ай бұрын
Hacks lol i kinda got that feeling also double silliness
@joe58343 ай бұрын
"upping their game in energy efficiency" is just another way of saying "to make shareholders alot of money". Mandatory demand runs construction from Washington to Rhode Island apparently
@essentialjudge22796 ай бұрын
You could get the stiffness back with just some lay-in braces before applying the sheathing
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
I don't' think that offers enough lateral resistance where we are at. I would look at metal strapping from Strong-Tie as an option if we can't get enough lateral on a future plan.
@garymitchell75513 ай бұрын
This is why people cannot afford houses because politicians and contractors (who can make money on the code upgrade) insist on the code upgrade …. Let people decide if they want more insulation instead of dictating… I used continuous on my house in Alabama bc I don’t want to pay higher electric bills
@kdegutis6 ай бұрын
Awesome, nailed it, Framers
@shanonquits28336 ай бұрын
Take it a step further and mitre your exterior corners on the zip sheathing. I wish I had done that on my project. Would have my siding easier.
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
I don't see any value in mitering the corners. Overlapping is idiot proof, but now I want to try it 🤣🤣
Polyiso (and XPS) R value drops as the outside temperature goes down - not a great feature for northern climates, but OK for southern. Also R value degrades with age, Polyiso’s R value drops 20% in 5 to 10 years. EPS (expanded polystyrene) insulation keeps its R value as temperature goes down and is expanded using Pentane gas, not hydrochlorofluorocarbons which is used to expand XPS.
@Tom-sd5ru6 ай бұрын
Bought the max stick nailer out. Thats one sexy looking nailer😂
@kwhatten5 ай бұрын
Does polyiso offgas? The guys cutting it aren't wearing face masks! And do all nail heads need to be taped?
@sonicboom20006 ай бұрын
STEVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@stevenbaczekarchitect94316 ай бұрын
Like a Sonic Boom!!!!
@bibbidi_bobbidi_bacons2 ай бұрын
Really trying to push that zip brand panels lol
@TheGuyOutdoors15 ай бұрын
Never seen it to meet code you need the most expensive sheeting on market. Seems like a monopoly scheme. And i live in the rustbelt. Sheathing walls makes it weigh more so when it crushes you, it really crushes you 😂
@paulmussell903614 күн бұрын
You would be better off using a 2x8 stud in your inside corners
@matthewhannum5160Ай бұрын
Nice Zip Stretch ASMR
@CaedmonOS5 ай бұрын
Eyes are not irreducibly complex. You can remove complexity from the eye and still have a functioning object. It might not be an eye as you would think of. You wouldn't be able to see as well, but you'd still have a use for it.
@jmhall9186 ай бұрын
“B T Dubs” 😂😂😂
@helmanfrow5 ай бұрын
0:56 1:18 Mr. B-roll is really hogging your voiceover. When editing your videos, please consider having only one person talking at a time.
@Kate-turbokateproductsАй бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤ I love you too
@charlesviner15656 ай бұрын
👍🔨
@whitneybrown93546 ай бұрын
Since you are closing the envelope I assume you are bringing in fresh makeup air?
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
yep, we bring in air and filter it through and ERV. I'll do a video with my brother to follow up on this.
@CybekCusal6 ай бұрын
It's always hilarious to listen to Steve talk about stuff he doesn't understand. Heat transfer calculations are under the HVAC engineer's purview thank God because architects don't know this stuff. The term thermal bridging doesn't even exist in the handbook. He forgot to include the exterior siding, drywall, and surface films in his math. Time to go back to school Steve.
@AwesomeFramers6 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching the videos. He was just talking about insulation. I look forward to your articles in trade magazines.
@stevenbaczekarchitect94316 ай бұрын
First of all, I do understand. How many residential projects typically have an HVAC Engineer? Oh thank you so much......it's not in the handbook so it doesn't exist, great way to look at it. As for the "extra" materials you cited, yes, they do exist, but their cumulative math, simply doesn't move the needle much. Keep up the great work, you're killing it!!!!
@derekgrey39272 ай бұрын
ICF or earthen is the way to go.
@kirkellis43292 ай бұрын
What a silly product. There is no way to tape the seams in the foam board that is attached to the OSB, so what prevents winter water vapor inside the house from reaching the edges of the OSB through the gaps in the foam ? Once there, it will condense due to the outside cold and lack of true exterior insulation. Check out all the SIP roofs and the way they rotted along the seams from the inside -- even though that foam was T&G and should have at least fitted tightly from one panel to the next compared to this. And how do you claim you've eliminated thermal bridging when you have thousands of nail or screw heads exposed to the cold and then running right through into the wall studs ? At least with exterior foam board you'd have many fewer fasteners doing that.