EXPLAINED: Is This Australian Scientist The Inventor Of Bitcoin?

[@VickiMcArthur-u1g]

You work for 40yrs to have $1M in your retirement, meanwhile some people are putting just $10K in a bitcoin from just a few months ago and now they are multi millionaires..🇺🇸.

[@Paula-m1z7c]

Hello How are you earning such monthly? I was born a Christian, and sometimes I feel down on myself because of low finances, but I still believe I can still make it someday. As a beginner how do I go about investing into Crypto!.

[@ShellyFerensJones]

I am 52 years old. I reached my first 100 thousand dollars in just 3 months. I started with 20k investing in Bitcoin ETFs and other dividend income. My medium-term goal is to grow my money investing forever for my business and children..

[@Marie-2668]

This year I reached 100 thousand invested in Bitcoin ETFs and other dividend income, it was exactly 1 year and 4 months, I already accelerated to reach 200 thousand, I think I will reach the goal sooner

[@Merry-gp8lp]

How did you achieve this in a short period of time?

[@Merry-gp8lp]

I would appreciate some advice please A. I am new to investing in stocks/cryptocurrencies. Can you guide me how to do this?

[@pyxldeu2749]

To people who say: "We are Satoshi" No, you did not invent Bitcoin and you did not solve the double spending problem.

[@shipcommanderlol6577]

Where I can watch full interview?

[@EmanueleNusca]

Why waste your time? There is nothing that the mainstream garbage can give you for your good. They are just there to deceive you and preach for money… wake up to the truth and look it into yourself.

[@daneharris1984]

There is no way that peanut is smart enough to have invented BTC 😂😂😂

[@jacobyako]

A Chinese university has a book claiming Craig Wright a satoshi nakamoto. Search it up.

[@michip.904]

That's interesting. I didn't know this. I never hear the chinese talking about that subject.

[@adiintel1]

You can always trust the Chinese there's Even a book in China that said covid was made in the u.s

[@jacobyako]

@@adiintel1 That can be said for every country. And these books are usually written by professors/doctors. Chinese officials have nothing to do with Craig Wright. Think like an economist when you make a point. Make sure your argument has all its pillars, or else it’ll fall apart.

[@adiintel1]

@@jacobyakoI wasn't arguing

[@samwilliams2093]

Well then you know it's true if a chinese university says it! What more proof do you need?!

[@lordofrodinia5033]

Your more frequent uploads have made this my go to channel for news with a splash of entertainment at the start.. Keep it up!!! A lot has changed and that's on everything but the truth is I don't even care much about bullish or bearish market anymore because Bryan Anderson got me covered as I am comfortably making 13.1B T C monthly..

[@giadapalandri2181]

Great skill and market knowledge. I enjoy the benefits and easy withdrawal without complaints, trade with the best.

[@gilbertfletcher2886]

He deserves more praise, just as I was going through the comments and saw this. I tried to bet something I'il never regret.

[@janeroland248]

Bryan's been a blessing, I never thought I'd make so much profit in the short term.

[@giuffrehenry2428]

I invested in stocks and crypto, but I think my crypto is better with Bryan Signals.

[@jackmorrison7807]

Crypto trade is definitely the future and the fastest way to achieve financial freedom Bryan trade is the best way to get to most of business life

[@horizonvariations]

If anybody wants to ACTUALLY understand why Craig will no longer prove (he already has and look where that has bloody got him), listen to his responses in the Hodlonaut trial.

[@SATOSHI.-Nakamoto]

Not your keys not your coin.

[@samwilliams2093]

This guy was caught faking a digital signature to prove he was Satoshi in 2018. He's not Satoshi. He's just an ordinary conman.

[@Carbonkraft]

This is fake news. Again DYOR.

[@viabursatil]

CSW no estafó a nadie. Seguramente te estafaron con LUNA, CELSIUS y otras y hablas asi. Increíble como cancelan a esta persona. Por idoneidad y conocimiento es el padre de Bitcoin, les guste o no. Saludos Hater!!!!!!

[@samwilliams2093]

@@Carbonkraft His posts on Slack are still there with the full forged signatures. You're denying reality again.

[@panzadura]

Yes.

[@SwaaallaGE]

I am here to say that today, this guy lost a court case and has now posted online that he is not satoshi

[@vikramrihal]

Yes he is Satoshi, but not the Satoshi people want or envisioned in their mind.

[@-ED-]

Yup, people created their own illusions about what kind of person Satoshi would have to be, based on their own idea of what Bitcoin is (which is false) so their starting assumption about Bitcoin thinking that its some anarchyst system, has lead them into rejecting all evidence that their illusions were just plain wrong and that Craig is the invetor of Bitcoin, heck they don't even know what Bitcoin is, let alone who must have been the person that created it 🙂

[@alfredom877]

they wanted another creep like Vitalik

[@alfredom877]

@@gmaxwell why ira vs craig why copa vs craig. keep making up fantasies

[@tunedcentral]

Mined bitcoin in 2012, followed all bitcoin news daily since then, Craig is Satoshi and Bitcoin SV is Bitcoin as per the original design.

[@michip.904]

Is it correct to say that BSV is de facto Bitcoin but technically a hard fork?

[@tunedcentral]

@@michip.904 a fork goes in two directions. In 2017 bitcoin split in two directions, BTC deviated away from the Bitcoin design with the addition of segregated witness, while BCH maintained the prior direction with the addition of a larger blocksize to accommodate more transactions. Later on BCH started to deviate from the original design again which gave rise to BSV. Since then the protocol has been returned to full functionality and scaled to greater capacity.

[@crazyprayingmantis5596]

🤣

[@alfredom877]

@@michip.904 NO, BTC and BCH are the forks. Bitcoin never forks. the exchanges colluded and kept calling Bitcoin BTC.

[@davidsparks1181]

Sure you did 🤣

[@lewismoon5277]

It’s certainly convincing, but Dr Wright does have a point, ownership cannot be proven with keys. Otherwise someone could just steal another persons keys and claim ownership.

[@BBH101]

Not your keys, not your crypto! Craig says that because he doesn't have Satoshi keys, and wants to claim he was hacked at the same time he claims to be a security expert. He lies constantly. He has presented false documents to courts over and over again. No way that man is Satoshi! He is, however, the most hated man in the space for his endless frivolous lawsuits.

[@-ED-]

This is exactly why Craig wants to do things the correct way, through courts, not through manipulated/corrupt social media mobs and fake account bots. Possession of keys does not prove ownership or that he created Bitcoin, other people as witnesses, his knowledge and work on Bitcoin is the actual way to prove this.

[@BBH101]

@@-ED- "Through the courts!" LOL. He lost against the developers while trying to have coins FORKED to him without evidence of ownership! YOU support that? Meanwhile, the BA capitulated and will be forking BSV to him, SOON, with zero evidence of ownership. He submitted massive quantities of forged document in the Kleiman case, and made claims that were LIES in the recent McCormack case! Do you people have any integrity? You follow a conman, and praise him as your GOD. It's a head scratcher! Hopefully it all comes to an end during the Hodlonaut trial, which will include "Truth." Bring on the fake documents, Craig.

[@alfredom877]

@@BBH101 Look everyone the sheep that has no idea about Bitcoin and the whitepaper

[@EdinKuky]

@@alfredom877 this "not your keys, not your crypto" is so idiotic, in their mind every crypto they have on the exchange is then by default not theirs 🙂

[@SRP_TV]

BTC is a Ponzi scheme invented by incompetent people after Satoshi Nakamoto left😂

[@dappinstitute]

Craig is 100% Satoshi. Do your research.

[@setorious]

Why do BSvers think that moving coins would not be evidence for the haters? which hater would still deny him being Satoshi if he moved coins? Some act like the goal post would get moved if he somehow proved himself ( i'd buy a couple BSV if he moved some coins as i'm sure many others would) and yes i get just cause you have keys and can drive around in a car doesn't mean you own it but it would get Craig and by extension BSV to be taken serious. Now it kinda seems like Craig is telling people he owns a expensive car but all he does is stand around it and no one has ever seen him actually enter or use it, just claim repeatedly that it is his and that driving it would be bad evidence. Telling us instead to trust his family members and how that is better evidence doesn't sit well with me.

[@-ED-]

We do not think it would not be evidence, surely it would be part of the evidence and the whole point we are making is that because it would only be PART OF the evidence, it means that there is already plenty of OTHER EVIDENCE to show that Craig is Satoshi. So If people keep refusing to see the other already available evidence and want to focus on this one thing only (as many of them say its the ONLY evidence they are willing to accept), then that is their own problem.

[@joshualynn9885]

creg used this as evidence a while ago with a "private signing". It was laughed at and told to do a public one....suddenly he doesn't think it's evidence anymore

[@-ED-]

@@joshualynn9885 First of all its Craig, not Creg, second he did do signing Satoshi's keys privately for few people, Gavin being one of them, and Gavin testified undear oath, with threat of purgery if false, about this and continues to vouch for Craig most likely being Satoshi and the key signing being valid, and third, Craig never said this is not evidence anymore, he is saying this alone is not proof, he actually uses the private signing as part of evidence that he is Satoshi, and all you people keep missing the other evidence. Craig simply does not want to do public signing, and if you were any smart you could easily think of few reasons why he would chose that. Your problem is you don't know (or want to) how to use that brain of yours and think logically.

[@joshualynn9885]

@@-ED- I've seen your "logical" and obsessive thinking over the years on other platforms. I know there's no point debating with you

[@RhythmicEye]

@@joshualynn9885 there’s no point debating unless you have an intelligent point to make which you do not.

[@pelaezj1]

DR. Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto and BSV is the original bitcoin.

[@horizonvariations]

Craig is obviously Satoshi. How is anybody still debating this?

[@gmaxwell]

No one is debating it: It was unambiguous to almost everyone that Wright was a total conman and a fraud once he posted faked signatures in 2016. Even back in 2015 the obvious nonsense technobabble made him pretty obviously a fake to most people with a technical background.

[@horizonvariations]

@@gmaxwell that's not what your old pal Gavin says

[@davidsparks1181]

He's a confirmed conman

[@Carbonkraft]

Craig Wright is Satoshi. He knew Bitcoin was Turing complete before anyone else, they all laughed at him when he said it, including Bitgold creator Nick Szabo, but now he is proven correct.

[@The_Viking_Explorer]

What a joke

[@TerenceChill286]

That's like saying Schwarzschild was the inventor of theory of general relativity, because he was the first one to solve Einsteins field equations.

[@Carbonkraft]

@@TerenceChill286 It proved Craig knows Bitcoin more deeply then anyone else in this entire industry including the person most belivede was Satoshi, aka Nick Szabo. He also explained why double hash, why 256k1, why 21 mil coins, why hashing or validation and Bitcoin scripts use before anyone else. + all the sworn witness testimonies from family and friends telling he is the creator of Bitcoin. And the closest person to Satoshi Gavin Andresen say its him and that he fits Satoshis personality.

[@-ED-]

@@TerenceChill286 logic is not very strong on your part 🙂

[@alfredom877]

@@The_Viking_Explorer You are

[@rowanhill8640]

Craig is 100% Satoshi Nakamoto and will go down in history as one of the most Inteligent individuals in this error. Happy to share all my research.

[@davidsparks1181]

Hahahaha hahahaha you're deluded

[@rowanhill8640]

@@davidsparks1181 I’m confident in my research as I said happy to share.

[@crazyprayingmantis5596]

Sure dude

[@davidsparks1181]

@@rowanhill8640 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 classic

[@alfredom877]

@@davidsparks1181 and you are a moonboy that is in denial why Copa vs Craig Wright why Ira vs Craig Wright Usually moonboys short circuit with these two questions.

[@drbitcoinpod]

For the full inside story on Wright's claim, check out our podcast series on the entire history of his attempts to convince the world he created Bitcoin.

[@sean27972]

show your wallet, PROVE IT

[@porter2k7]

Do your homework and you'll find CSW is the satoshi you're looking for.

[@ctcsys]

so much trolling needed to manipulate ppl to think Craig should not be recogn as Satoshi.. thats proof on its own

[@crazyprayingmantis5596]

No it's not

[@alfredom877]

This is the reason why I looked into him like 4 yrs ago

[@davidsparks1181]

@@alfredom877 hahahaha hahahaha noob

[@AlperEfe]

Why do you do the analysis if there are reliable Cross Staking platforms such as Cross Staking?

[@champ200900000]

Craig says he has 27 degree’s . I work for a Uni and I can tell you it normally takes 2 yrs to complete a post graduate degree so based on that alone it would take Craig 54 years to compete those plus his initial undergraduate degree would take another 3 years minimum so that means that assuming no breaks and FULL time study it would take Craig at least 57 years to graduate from 27 university degrees lol Maybe he needs to do a degree in honesty??

[@EdinKuky]

Er, every degree Craig has, has already been confirmed. Feel free to go check it yourself, do your own investigation.

[@champ200900000]

@@EdinKuky 🙃

[@viabursatil]

Por eso es un genio y más!!! Porque no lees su foro y verás que es quien más sabe de Bitcoin? No la toca de oído. Es el padre de la criatura!!!

[@-ED-]

@@champ200900000 dude, you are more like a chump, not a champ 🙂

[@davidsparks1181]

@@EdinKuky hahahaha hahahaha

[@champ200900000]

Lol I am going to do this once and once only and I will never , ever be on a camera again for ANY tv station he says lol and that was many years ago lol lies , lies and more lies! 🤣

[@SATOSHI.-Nakamoto]

He gets pissed off because he's not Satoshi personally I find this offensive because I left to take care of the woman I love that died to come back to this fraud pretending to be me that cannot sign a message or a key or move a single coin what a joke by the way I'm a 46 year old man from America.

[@tom7784]

lol troll, go back to your mums basement, CSW is Satoshi

[@PR-ot7qd]

If you can find a way to obtain the keys to the genesis wallet, you are SN, and also a bilionaire.

[@champ200900000]

You won’t find a way. Only Satoshi can and if someone moves them one day it won’t be CW so watch the laughter and jokes if/when that happens from everyone lol

[@kyzendiff]

I have seen the best interest rates only at staking sites with Cross Staking technology, Cross Staking for example

[@SatoshiNakamoto.Bitcoin]

I am the real one.

[@cryptorebel6039]

The hosts especially at the end seem completely unaware that Dr. Wright has already offered proof and signed with Block 1 and Block 9 for Gavin Andresen and others.

[@cryptorebel6039]

@@davidsparks1181 That's nonsense, especially considering all of the other circumstantial evidence surrounding Dr. Wright. And Gavin Andresen testified under oath that he was not "bamboozled" as you liars claim.

[@Carbonkraft]

@@davidsparks1181 wrong. Read Gavin Andresens latest deposition. He still belives the signing was real and that Craig is Satoshi. You need to DYOR and stop reading Twitter nonsense. Go to the source.

[@AnotherCyborgApe]

@@Carbonkraft There are no valid reasons for doing a "private signing" except to bamboozle people. Let's see what Gavin has to say about it: “There are places in the private proving session where I could have been fooled, where somebody could have switched out the software that was being used or, perhaps, the laptop that was delivered was not a brand-new laptop, and it had been tampered with in some way. I was also jet lagged. And, again, I was not in the headspace of this is going to prove to the world that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto. I was in the head space of, you know, this will prove to me beyond a reasonable doubt that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto. And my doubts arise because the proof that was presented to me is very different from the pseudo proof that was later presented to the world.” Stop enabling a con-man.

[@cryptorebel6039]

Look on court listener to see what he said under oath, contrary to your cult's narrative: "I meant that he bamboozled me about the 6 gobbledygook proof, but I still think it's most 7 likely that he did not bamboozle me during the 8 signing ceremony. 9 Q And he really does have possession of the 10 private key to block 9? 11 A I still think it's more likely than not 12 that he does."

[@AnotherCyborgApe]

@@cryptorebel6039 What a coincidence, I got Gavin's words from his own deposition on court listener as well, which he also said under oath, in the very same document you quoted. You can search that document for the word "bamboozled" for more hilarity, but the takeaway here is that Gavin's word does not equate a valid key signing. If Craig wanted to do a key signing, he would have. Instead, he performed a charade that duped a few naive folks who have a hard time admitting it. If you cared about the validity of a key signing as you appear to defend one here, you would also ponder why Craig did his little convoluted dance followed by a ridiculous blog post that Gavin describes in the same deposition: "So the blog post that Craig released was not at all what I expected him to release. I expected him to release a very simple, you know, I am Satoshi, here is some -- here is a simple message signed with an early key from an early block. Instead, he released a very wacky supposed proof that actually wasn't a proof of anything but was incredibly technical and hard to follow, and I was as surprised as anybody to see that. And it -- it took, I don't know, a few hours, a day, for somebody to -- to figure out what all that technical gobbledygook actually meant and to show that it wasn't actually a proof of anything."

[@OrimarDez]

If the satoshi coins are locked up in a trust how do you move it?

[@champ200900000]

Lol He made that up.

[@gmaxwell]

@@EdinKuky nLockTime hasn't been disabled in any way in Bitcoin that is a great example of the bold lies the Wright constantly tells. People come and go from Bitcoin development all the time-- it's a volunteer open source thing. That said, vicious harassment by court adjudicated liars like Wright and his conspirators doesn't make it more enjoyable!

[@TheLionManOnline]

Craigs use of car keys being the same as holding keys for crypto is ridiculous it's not the same. If you own the coins to the crypto you do own them. Someone else can hold the same keys but whoever uses them first ultimately will control the coins. Satoshi invented a system based around proof (keys) and this clown can't do that = FAKE

[@Carbonkraft]

having keys is the worst prof you can have, anyone could have said keys... Craig knows bitcoin better then anyone else, thats the proof!

[@TheLionManOnline]

@@Carbonkraft Anyone could have said keys? Do you even know what you're talking about. If anyone could have the keys anyone could spend the Bitcoin satoshi mined.

[@lewismoon5277]

So if someone steals keys, they own the coins?

[@Carbonkraft]

​@@TheLionManOnline ANYONE could have stolen those coins. ANYONE could have the keys to your house. If i have your car-keys am i now you? Use your brain. Simply having keys does NOT prove identity. This is a matter of principle. This is not how Bitcoin works. This is not how anything in the real world works, and Bitcoin is made for the real world. Craig is 100% correct. Its a very important principle. Code is not law, law is law.

[@TheLionManOnline]

​@@lewismoon5277 Not your keys = not you Bitcoin, heard of it? Holding the keys and owning the Bitcoin are the exact same thing. Multiple people could hold the keys but then it's a race to who spends them first.

[@josephcafariello365]

Something doesn't make sense about Craig Wright claiming to be Satoshi. We know that Satoshi went out of his way to keep himself anonymous. If Craig Wright really is Satoshi, why does he now all of a sudden want everyone to know who he is? It just doesn't make sense. Here's what I think the real story is. Craig was part of a team of people who called themselves "Satoshi Nakamoto". There is no Satoshi as an individual. It's the name of the group. One by one, all the members of this group die from various causes. The last one remaining from this group is Craig. Now that all the other people who have knowledge that Satoshi is the name of their group are dead, Craig is free to proclaim himself as Satoshi, without anyone from the original group around to challenge him.

[@ImDreamingVideo]

It's more obvious than ever: Craig is the only person who definitely is NOT Satoshi.

[@Acquisitor]

Inventor no, narcissist = yes.

[@Carbonkraft]

He has more blockchain inventions (patents) then any other living person.

[@-ED-]

Can you name any other person that knows more about Bitcoin system then Craig? How about anyone who has more patents on Bitcoin on which he has been working on for years? How about the fact that he is behind BSV the only blockchain which uses the Bitcoin system and is only one which actually scales?

[@Acquisitor]

He cant move a single btc belonging to satoshi

[@alfredom877]

@@Carbonkraft FACTS. around 1200 patents to be exact

[@alfredom877]

@@Acquisitor Keep coping moonboy

[@robertdewees9418]

Of course he's not Satoshi, that's ridiculous.

[@panzadura]

Property ≠ Possession.

[@alfredom877]

doesn't mean you invented it. Mic drop

[@magicflounder6959]

No. Just, no. It’s as simple as that.

[@ianjameslake]

OP_PUSHDATA4 dyor. Or not... Shrug.

[@-ED-]

Uh yes... keep living in your fantasy of BTC Ponzi narrative and see where it gets you 🙂 Ignoring facts will teach you a tough lesson

[@champ200900000]

@@-ED- you are in your own religion

[@-ED-]

@@champ200900000 religion? lol Sorry, religions are based on beliefs, my understanding is based on facts, about Bitcoin system, and following common sense. It is YOU who is part of the BTC cult who have created a religion... "we are all Satoshi" which is literally an imposibility sound like one? How about the belief that even though BTC can only do 7Tx/s that somehow whole world (billions of people) will be able to adopt it, ie USE IT? Yeah... there is your religion 🙂

[@champ200900000]

@@-ED- lol please take a look within and then try to enjoy life. Politics are not my thing. I’m not saying your BSV is not good.

[@pullendecius3375]

I totally agree with what you are saying..I started in crypto in August 2017 , and I bought in.I was up 5x by December only to watch that disappear quickly and then watch the original investment go down by about 85 % during the ensuing 4 year bear market . I took the opportunity to accumulate more over the last 4 years which was hard to do and at the same time a smart thing to do . I wish I had bought more . I am in profit for now but I am planning on using my experience and what i have learnt from Garry Rowan.have learned from you and other Youtubrs especially my mentor Garry Rowan. who taught me how to make trade and increase my crypto from 2btc to 13btc that no one really knows what is going to happen in the market and I know you are only saying what you think will happen based on the past . It is yours and my opinion so people should make their own investment choices based on their own research ...

[@carthagonova4132]

I hope cryptocurrences will crash completly soon. Thanks to them building good gaming PC is almost 2 times more costly.

[@davidsparks1181]

Craig rekt 😂

[@coldbexGames]

Personally, I keep my USDT only on Cross Staking. The most reliable for the current day

[@champ200900000]

NEO is far superior to everything on the entire market and is far more useful than all of the coins put into one. This is why they say all in one , all in NEO.

[@alfredom877]

put a sock on it. I sold all my neo ever sense all the projects started to leave the shitcoin. FEES.

[@Carbonkraft]

BSV is far superior.

[@champ200900000]

@@Carbonkraft of course it is 🙃

[@ΙωαννιδηςΠετρος]

Neo is not POW... So it lost..