You are awesome. Please keep the inflows. You are gem in explaining fundamental. Very much appreciate your works and sharing the videos.
@railwayengineeringinsights64632 жыл бұрын
Many thanks for your kind words
@EiShweZin-fl4xu Жыл бұрын
Good explanation. Thank you for your sharing.
@railwayengineeringinsights6463 Жыл бұрын
Thanks alot
@Alisyeddaulat Жыл бұрын
Your explanation is amazing.
@the340club Жыл бұрын
Make a highly detailed video on SPDs
@rajendranpravishn7290 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your knowledge. I would be great if you could do a video on DC Traction protection systems. DC breakers
@thabanimahlobo5882 Жыл бұрын
Good morning Sir. Do you have a lecture on internal lightning protection systems?
@aliuyar63652 жыл бұрын
Perfect explanation
@railwayengineeringinsights64632 жыл бұрын
Many thanks
@hazelnut40693 ай бұрын
can you explain how the IEC got the relationship between alpha angles and? and why they divided them into classes sir?
@alexnoggle18745 ай бұрын
Thanks for the helpful video!
@rjtsxn7 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot sir. Highly appreciated.
@railwayengineeringinsights64637 ай бұрын
Thanks
@OWAIS843 Жыл бұрын
HOW DO YOU DESIGN THE SIZE (CROSS SECTION) OF DOWN CONDUCTOR?
@railwayengineeringinsights6463 Жыл бұрын
For this we need to refer to iec 62305-3 table 6 or table 2 of iec 62561-2
@OWAIS843 Жыл бұрын
@@railwayengineeringinsights6463 what is the contact resistance limit for the down conductor connection?
@deccanass2 жыл бұрын
Greatly appreciated
@railwayengineeringinsights64632 жыл бұрын
Many thanks
@sudampatra5608 Жыл бұрын
Explain mess method
@railwayengineeringinsights6463 Жыл бұрын
Sorry I might not be able to make videos in upcoming months. But you can refer to table I attached in this video at time stamp 18:16. Based on class of level selected as per risk assessment (iec 62305-2) you can choose either 5x5, 10x10, etc. As per that table
@shihabahmed1457 Жыл бұрын
Thanks
@gerhardkutt76523 ай бұрын
You should state that this maths is based on assumptions. It is a risk calculation and not an actual one. This is a theory which has zero scientific proof that is actually factual. The striking distance is an assumption based on distance and not charge density - which is where this assumption fails. Charge density location is unpredictable.
@railwayengineeringinsights64633 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment. You are correct, and even the standard states it clearly. However, the intention of this video was to help someone design the LPS if required based on risk assessment conducted as per IEC 62305-2 or other equivalent standards. Maybe in another video where I will try to explain about lightning strikes, I will mention what you said.