F1 Racing Championship (PlayStation vs Nintendo 64) Gameplay Comparison

[@dookie_12]

Happy Grand Prix weekend, Brazil!

[@RiasatSalminSami]

Holy shit, the tires become green with grass when driving over grass. That's some sick details.

[@godistv]

It happens in Formula 1 95…

[@armandillo26]

Si lo ví, en la parte de PS1 como la rueda se quedó verde cuando pasó por el pasto y luego el neumático recuperó su color negro, cuando estuvo de vuelta patinando en la pista y me quedé muy loco.

[@RiasatSalminSami]

@@armandillo26 what

[@afronautexplorer144]

@@RiasatSalminSami he said, "I saw it on the PS1 part and it blew me away" in Spanish.

[@armandillo26]

@@RiasatSalminSami listem :v

[@JohnCharb87]

Second watch observations: Also the inro for Playstation is red because I believe the song from Garbage plays during. 1. You accelerate faster on the N64 version. 2. 3:17 The side mirrors on the Ps1 version shows real time reflections! 3. The tracks are similar but have differences. The PS1 version has a blimp in the sky. Also 4:38 there is a giant screen. Hard to tell if its a still image or moving but its there. 4. PS1 at 60fps? Very smooth 5. The visual effects are quite stunning on the PS1. Lens flare and lighting effects on the car body. Smoke from braking. Suspension that looks to articulate at every bump.

[@SeijuroHiko-vx3lw]

The problem with cartridges is that developers try to use the smallest cartridges possible, to save money and make more money. This game could have used a 64MB cartridge but uses a 16MB one.

[@JoseaparecidoAlves-nx6ll]

Yes

[@veg411]

It didn't need a larger cartridge. The issue is that developers were largely using RGB textures at the time, and the N64's 4k of TMEM severely limited the resolution of how large a texture could be. This could have been fixed by more liberal use of color-indexed (16 or 255 color palette) or even intensity (grayscale) textures that could have massively improved the visual fidelity with clever artist utilisation.

[@davidaitken8503]

How is this game limited by the cartridge size used? Honestly, I think some clueless people just state the same dumb talking points over and over again regardless of if it pertains to the particular game or not. You try use brain better now. Use gooder of bad brain.

[@Spolupyo]

It's not a problem with the cartridge format, is the N64 hardware, its VDP had a very limited amount of WRAM (unified) for the framebuffer so developers had to use compressed/low resolution textures that looked horrible once the texture mapping is applied, add to that the low resolution of the N64... the end result is a blurry mess.

[@apollosungod2819]

Uh no and please STOP using "MegaByte" ROM size or even this thinking that 64 MB was easy to just slap on a game... it doesn't work that way. The proper way to describe ROM sizes in the 90s and even by 2000 for the last N64 ROM Cartridges is Megabit sizes. Therefore a 16 MB ROM size is 128 Megabit Always note that Super Mario 64 was a 4 MB ROM size or 64 Megabit ROM size That makes the comparison much more meaningful for those of us who actually purchased N64 games back then when they were new and especially in comparison to CD-ROM CD-ROM storage is 650 MB but due to the fact that it's a CD-ROM, it means read times depend on the optical disc drive mechanism... back when Sony PlayStation 1 launched only 2X Speed CD-ROM drives existed as reasonably affordable... had Sony or Sega slapped a 4X CD-ROM drive to launch in 1994 it would have added at minimum a $200 dollar plus price hike and would have made loading times shorter or faster but the fact is CD-ROM drive speed and RAM were the most expensive components that could be added to videogame systems back then. The Nintendo 64 stock system specs and the 128 Megabit ROM size was decent and reasonable for that particular developer the problem however is that PlayStation launched in December 1994 Japan, Nintendo 64 launched in April 1996 so third party devs had to really make the decision back then as programmers to learn how to properly use the N64 document tools and how to properly use the limited ROM Cartridge size... it wasn't a deal breaker at all especially when you remember that elite Nintendo developed games used small ROM sizes and when those ROM sizes got bigger the games became bigger as well.

[@ivey77426]

PSX owns it. Better framerate, better details, more effects.

[@armandillo26]

Qué grande VC!! me encanta cuando las comparaciones son justas con hardware real y no emuladas dandole ventajas a una versión y desprestigiando a la otra. Ambas versiones son buenas pero el de Playstation resalta más en varios aspectos, me encanta que en ambos la distancia de dibujado es bastante alta y la velocidad es rapida constante y muy estable sin caidas de frames en ningun lugar, simplemente me encanta todo éso, en los juegos de carreras, odio la distancia de dibujados cortas y caidas de frames en ciertos lugares con vegetación o carga gráfica mayor.

[@jhkuno88]

Very weird glitch on PSX version at 5:26.....when the car goes out of track the "shine" effect on the car surface dissapears for it to just reappear the moment it goes back on track....very weird

[@Desafinado83]

Wow, PS1 looks like next-gen compared to the N64

[@cizar2000]

@@Desafinado83 hahahaha .. Do you forget how bad this game was in ps1 version in analogic televisions with shaking textures and large pixels Dont talk stupid thinks.

[@pgr3290]

PS1 works better because the pixelation of the grass textures is more convincing to the human eye how grass is than one blank flat homogenous green texture that may as well be painted concrete on N64. PS1 version appears to perform better with N64 struggling with decent transparency effects. Overall PS1 is more vibrant and sharper thanks to the typical N64 blur filter effect. It must be pointed out that by 2000 PS1 was very old hardware indeed with PS2 having launched months before this game arrived. It does show just how well developers had mastered Sony's machine at this point. The difference in this title graphically and the early F1 games is enormous. Huge.

[@davidaitken8503]

@@pgr3290 Yes, we all know that grass in the real world looks like wobbly pixels. Bwa, ha, ha, ha! Give it a rest. I don't know how much is the work of the textures or if its' gouraud shading but the grass in the N64 version definitely looks more convincing. I would also add that N64 games like Zelda OoT and Banjo Kazooie, just to name a few, always had more convincing looking fields of grass in that era of games than anything I ever saw on Playstation.

[@pgr3290]

@davidaitken8503 No, grass does not look like painted concrete like in the clearly inferior N64 version of this game. It is embarrassing how much better this game looks on PS1, N64 really was a poorly designed console hardware wise and that's one for the reasons it sold so badly relative to PS1 or even the SNES.

[@davidaitken8503]

@@pgr3290 The N64 didn't sell as well because Sony spent a fortune giving many key 3rd party developers sweetheart deals to bring their games out on Playstation instead of N64. Say what you will about Nintendo's 3rd party licensing but it treated everyone equally. The N64 was significantly superior to the Playstation in terms of hardware. That is an objective fact that is not up for debate and you need only compare the most ambitious exclusives on each system to see that. You TROLLBOTS just don't know when to quit.

[@sebastiankulche]

@@davidaitken8503 There is no N64 game i saw with 3d grass, only a painted blurry texture.

[@athos5359]

@@pgr3290 i think sony had the better tools and willing too share it faster with 3 party developers,the ps 1 also has a soundchip with his own pool of ram and a gpu with it s own pool of ram helps a lot so that the cpu can use the main bus better even if ps1 cpu and gpu are slower... atleast 2 times slower.

[@antonio_carvalho]

The FPS is horrendous on the N64, I always felt the console was underpowered for the cool games it had.

[@simobourne561]

framerate problems on N64 are mainly caused by its memory latency, but on N64 it's mainly frame-drops therefore a "choppy" framerate while on PS1 it's more often slowdowns or the whole game being slower than on N64 (because the frame-drops on N64 doesn't slow down the animations and the dynamism of the game), that said the good developers were able to achieve good framerates or make better choices for a stable framerate (banjo-Kazooie at 30 fps with very good texture work, OOT with stable 20 fps and very dynamic action in large areas, etc)

[@sebastiankulche]

​​​@@simobourne561I remember however BK being very unstable in specific areas, mainly the desert hub world and Gobi Valley That type of slowdown depends on the game, not on the hardware, as i also know some PS1 games that updates the animation according to the framerate the game is running at the moment. Its not something exclusive of the N64.

[@simobourne561]

Looks way better on PS1, the N64 version looks even worse than Mario kart 64.

[@BeefJerkey]

Worse than the PlayStation version of this game? Yes. Worse than MK64? No. Absolutely not.

[@davidaitken8503]

Both versions of this game look worse than Mario Kart 64 and it manages to run a 4-player split-screen too. Dumb TROLLBOTS.

[@jhkuno88]

"Way better" XD Theres a bit of comment on your fanboyism..... Both look terrible (or good) for different reasons

[@simobourne561]

you're wrong, I generally prefer N64 graphics, but there are many N64 games that are far from its potential unlike PS1 (which was much easier to develop for)

[@jhkuno88]

"Way better" is an overstatement, theres nothing on the PSX version thats "way better" (well, maybe the framerate? If you can call it that)....and the N64 version has its own things that look better like more vivid colors for car models, a better draw distance and a more stable and solid IQ amongat other stuff.....so yeah....YOU are wrong

[@VMC_Boy]

I noticed on N64 it said "Expansion Pack not detected". Not sure what benefit you get with this game. But would be interesting to compare.

[@SammyRenard]

None; generally games that used it for increased color depth/screen resolution had even worse frame rates

[@sebastiankulche]

I cant imagine how terrible the game would play if it already struggles with vanilla hardware.

[@rafamelis_14]

No 64 é praticamente em câmera lenta tamanho queda de FPS! Eu prefiro a versão do PlayStation!

[@Rafael_Francisco]

Concordo, mas talvez seja problema de emulação ou falta do expansion pak. Esse jogo em específico era bem divertido no 64, joguei muitas vezes, e acho a jogabilidade melhor que no Ps1 apesar de ter claramente gráficos piores.

[@EduardoSilva-ze8tp]

Todos os jogos de Nintendo 64 parecem de massinha de modelar kkkkkkk

[@TheRealPatete]

They're actually two different games under the same title/cover.

[@gurujoe75]

easy win for PS1, bye vaseline 20fps N4.

[@JJcc-hc]

El ps1 lo destrozó

[@james2175]

Chocado como o PS1 botou o N64 pra mamar aqui!

[@juarezmiranda]

Pior que quase todos os jogos multi o PS1 leva a melhor.

[@james2175]

​@@juarezmiranda O problema do N64 são as texturas. Não há espaço para texturas muito complexas e vários jogos parecem extremamente vazios. Mas quando a empresa sabe bem o que fazer, saem jogos excelentes.

[@iwanttocomplain]

I've never seen a racing game where the car used up quite as much of the screen as this PS1 game.

[@iwanttocomplain]

PS: N64 is not 64bit. although it does have a useless and problem-causing 64bit address function, it serves no practical purpose. It's 32bit, just like the SNES is 8bit.

[@SeijuroHiko-vx3lw]

@@iwanttocomplain SNES's processors is 16-bit in its core. It emulates 8-bit operation for backward compatibility with its predecessor. But is really 16-bit. For N64, 64-bit cpu was useless back in the day. It became usefull only with Xbox One and PS4. In this game on N64 everyting looks like compressed. At the begining of the generation cartridge was not a big problem, because most of the games did not use more than couple or tens of MB on CD-ROM, everything was full with FMVs and streamed CD quality music. But at the end like here, it's very dramatic. N64 version of this game is 16MB, PS1 version is 569MB.

[@iwanttocomplain]

@@SeijuroHiko-vx3lw the SNES cpu will accept 16bit values but I get the impression they wouldn't be at all useful in the snes's case. Especially when speed and ease of programming is concerned. The fps on the N64 game is way low. There is just too much detail for the engine the programmers managed to build.

[@juarezmiranda]

Ah versão de PS1 destruiu a versão do N64.

[@JohnCharb87]

1. The N64 version has a minimap with 22 dots. Quite large layout of Interlagos. PS1 has a radar which I've never been a fan of. 2. The HUD on the N64 has Fuel, pit, and safety flags. 3. N64 anolog stick over PS1 directional pad anyday. 4. N64 is missing graphical elements like the clouds and Sao Paulo cityscape features. 5. More voices on thr N64 version. Just got my racing fix. FIA WEC season final race at Bahrain is happening now.

[@jhkuno88]

The Sao Paulo cityscape is visible at 4:26......is just a smaller bitmap so its less visible

[@SonixXaccount-r7e]

That said, PSX version is way better.

[@jhkuno88]

@@SonixXaccount-r7e "way better"? Theres a bit of comment on your fanboyism im afraid.....there is nothing "way better" on the PSX version

[@frxn211]

​@@jhkuno88The game was made *for* Playstation. The N64 version is just a port (fantastic one at that) that added things not really that necessary in order to justify the lesser content and the weird texturing (grass being one green sludge, for example) due to storage difficulties and the bad framerate. Still an amazing job on their end though, but they really should've gone with a 64MB cart instead of the 16bit. It needed those textures.

[@sebastiankulche]

​@@jhkuno88Let me guess, you dont think any PS1 game is way better.

[@FZuloaga]

It's like watching a random game on arcade vs pc version. I've never played any of those versions. It looks like PS1 is fun, but N64 seems realistic in terms of gameplay: physics and stuff.

[@chrisducati26]

Every game on Playstation look better, n64 always has that childish textures and blurry colors

[@SomeOrangeCat]

Can you explain what a "childish texture" is?

[@davidaitken8503]

@@SomeOrangeCat It can't because it is the same stupid TROLLBOT program that always uses the term "childish" for anything Nintendo and "blurry" for everything N64 specifically. You know these anti-Nintendo fanboys are losing when they have to utilize TROLLBOT programs to spam constant comments like this on every video to try to give the impression their views have popular support.

[@commonsensei8719]

F1 World Grand Prix 2 on N64 Is a way better F1 game than this one

[@parazels83]

Funny question: did Sega Saturn have only one rally racing game?

[@caiorios1631]

DAY-TO-NAAAAAA!

[@parazels83]

@caiorios1631 it's not rally

[@caiorios1631]

@@parazels83 Oh, i'm sorry dude. Didn't read it right!

[@Monacomaverick]

The team that made Sega Rally also made Rally de Africa and Rally de Europe for the Playstation under the name Prism Arts. These were not released in the USA.

[@wahrheit3609]

PSX has better sounds, better frames and better graphic.

[@AirFerno]

Os efeitos do N64 fazem o gameplay do jogo parecer um grande vídeo em CG, o que me parece bom. Mas sinto que o PS1 demonstra bem mais detalhes mesmo não tendo efeitos de anti-allising e mipmap.

[@codigomorsevp]

Perfeito! Apesar de mais bonito no N64, no Playstation possui mais detalhes através das texturas, coisa que no N64 não possui tanto. No geral classificaria os dois como jogos bem bons

[@rodrigomomo4850]

Concordo plenamente! Gostei das duas versões, porém a memória extra do CD permitiu um nível maior de detalhes como as placas de publicidade com marcas brasileiras. 🇧🇷

[@overwatch761]

I owned F1 racing on PS1 and F1 WGP2 on N64 back in the day - F1 WGP2 looks miles better than that crude port.

[@paulwonderley538]

Ps1 has way more effects going on I still love the N64 version but just on a crt like it was supposed to be played

[@j.c.s7762]

For n64 it's like Virtua Racing

[@Crystallums]

Amazing detail in the PS1 version... the brightness, colors, and 3D models are definitely better in this version! 😎👍🍺

[@RDRFoto]

Hasta el framerate de N64 se aprecia menor, con un movimiento menos fluido...

[@ryutenmen]

PS1 version looks to clean and colorful, like a video game, N64 on the other hand has the colors tone down and also has a blur/dust effect, like they wanted to make it look more real.

[@cizar2000]

These small-screen comparisons aren't fair. On analog televisions, PS1 games have shaky textures, very wide pixels and a lot of grain. Nintendo 64 games had a clean appearance without jaggies, it's impossible to compare.

[@iorch82]

As usual, the PS1 smokes another texture-filtered mess N64 turd.

[@ElsweyrDiego]

parecem dois jogos completamente diferentes feitos por desenvolvedoras diferentes xD

[@LeonGal95]

PlayStation does what Nintendon't 64 🗿🚬.

[@_SereneMango]

Being easier to develop for because Nintendo wanted the opposite on purpose!

[@sebastiankulche]

@@_SereneMango PS1 may had been easier to develop, but in its first years, Sony shared terrible development libraries that limited the machine like 1/10 of its intended poly count.

[@pitoresco_san]

Juro que eu não me lembrava da Ubisoft ter lançado um jogo de F1 pro PSOne. Só lembrava do Formula One da Sony e do F1 da EA Sports.

[@giovannimarcelodasilva768]

Minha nossa, a versão do PSX ganha com facilidade, tem melhores gráficos e iluminação e os carros tem maior reflexo nesta versão. Já a versão do Borrão64 dispensa comentários.

[@julesboomer363]

I only played the PS1 version.

[@cizar2000]

The EXCLUSIVE and most realistic Formula 1 game of the fifth generation was [N64] F-1 World Grand Prix; Has option for first person camera, atmospheric effects, high quality audio. This VÍDEO shows a not good game,but F-1 World Grand Prix; looks Dreamcast game in NIntendo 64.

[@sheltontristania]

Because not use expansion pak?

[@ediocorrea-corretor-imoveis]

Se tiver monaco no games seria legal fazer um video da pista comparando.

[@gabrielbarreto9731]

jogo deveras impressionante no ps1.

[@jhna314]

PS1 wins.

[@nelsonbi2008]

Hasta me parece una falta de respeto que en los 90 sigan usando almacenamiento de 16MB

[@sebastiankulche]

Aumentarle la capacidad a los cartuchos de N64 era muy costoso se ve. Realmente no hay tantos que usen 64mb en especial third party.

[@Oinc1914]

PS1 mantém um framerate melhor, o som é melhor e até o brilho no carro, consegue encher de pequenos detalhes no céu e mais prédios aos arredores. Porém prefiro a jogabilidade do n64 e o no modelo do carro que é menor na tela. Nunca gostei como os carros viram em quase todos F1 de playstation, fora que faz falta minimapa em qq jogo de corrida.

[@apollosungod2819]

Just to kill the narrative some seem to spin against the NIntendo 64 hardware and ROM Cartridges... the Sony PlayStation launched in Japan in December 1994... so even if the North American launch was in September 1995 it does NOT change the fact that it launched in Japan in 1994 simply because Sony was new and was not ready for a worldwide launch back then.. Sega was ready for a worldwide launch in 1994 but Sega of America's management staff refused to support the Sega Saturn... which is why SoA management got their way to create the 32X and dupe or scam Sega headquarters in Japan into making it under fears of high prices and consumers, in fact if you wrote to the Official Sega Visions magazine in 1994 and asked about the Sega Saturn (because it was officially announced in January 1993 Japan and all the gamer magazines were talking about it) what you would get told was "go check out the 32X" like a tool. Nintendo launched halfway in 1996 because they were targeting some high clock speeds with the N64 processors, that was why they could not launch in 1995, therefore Nintendo 64 was brand new hardware... This means that by the year 2000 the Sony PlayStation documentation tools are TWO whole years MORE ADVANCED so even a scrub game dev by the year 2000 could have the potential to make an amazing looking and playing game. Meanwhile VideoSystem devs under Ubi Soft were still evolving as game devs making F1 racing games so it's not the same but you can see that they do no need to use FMV and use voices and music more efficiently... The other problem with Nintendo 64 is that it did not ship at launch with the 4MB RAM Pack... that arrived in 1997 or 98 under third party dev requests and it was successful in selling tons of 4MB RAM Packs because in North America most N64 owners actually supported Nintendo... however that still does not mean a game dev can require the 4MB RAM Pack for game programming and design because they might alienate those who did not buy it and games take an average of two years to one year to develop or more even back then so if VideoSystem and UBISOFT took the risk of requiring the 4MB RAM Pack and using the largetst ROM size at that time it means they would have had to design the 3d engine for that since around 1998...if they did it would have been a clear game over.. that is what makes the N64 version as it is just way more impressive given the limitations... remember even Sega Dreamcast Flag to Flag racing game has foggy graphics at times and wasn't this major leap despite the hardware.

[@locked01]

Why the framerate on N64 seems to suck??

[@misterniggo7635]

Seems?

[@crazedlunatic43]

A GPU bottleneck where frame rates take a dip due to fill rate issues regarding N64. Simply put: Give the GPU a crap ton to display on screen and it will start to choke. However, said GPU was fully programmable via microcode and using custom microcode is how you improve fill rates.

[@frxn211]

​@@crazedlunatic43Which Nintendo never gave documentation for microcode changes, except for specific devs. It was a very weird move on their end

[@somegit7113]

That's a very very flat Interlagos.

[@catboyxx]

playstation aplasto la version de n64

[@cyberngarenfetcher4117]

SONY PlayStation wins!

[@wallacewallace2]

n64 win 😳

[@parazels83]

Racing games always look better on PSX.

[@TheFred128]

Really?😂 Search for San Francisco rush N64 vs PS1

[@parazels83]

@TheFred128 1 better version vs 100 worse versions? Nice ratio!

[@joesshows6793]

Yeah to muddy on n64

[@joesshows6793]

@@TheFred128that’s an exception for sure.

[@AlexSBedini]

Wonder how n64 graphics would look if expansion pak was used, nevertheless ps1 is puke like!! Look at the back wheels they look as if they are moving left to right

[@samsoulee]

wait, the ps1 version looks waaay better !!???

[@ViperKreuz]

The N64 is doing a lot more in the graphical effects than the PS1 version, despite the blurry look. Bear in mind, back in the day, the blur wouldn't have been that obvious as we used to have CRT TVs.

[@mrwasi99]

@@ViperKreuz crt tv aka the good ol' days

[@miguelelgueta5830]

which is not surprising since N64 came out a whole year later and was more expensive

[@davidaitken8503]

@@miguelelgueta5830 Dear God, TROLLBOT programs seem to be getting dumber. In the U.S. the Playstation was $300 at launch. The N64 was $200 at launch. Last time I checked, $300 was more than $200 or has something changed? Dumb TROLLBOTS.

[@BurritoKingdom]

​@@davidaitken8503 PS1 and Saturn dropped their prices to $199 right before the N64 launched. Sega was even giving out 3 free games that Christmas of 1996. The 90s were great for gaming prices, whenever 1 system would drop in prices the others would follow. By Christmas 1999 the PS1 and N64 were $99 and the Dreamcast had just launched. PS1 normalized videogames for $50. N64 games were still on average $70 like during the SNES and Genesis era because it uses carts. Sega Saturn games were originally $60 but when Sega saw what Sony was doing in 1995, they quickly matched Sony's prices in 1996.

[@simobourne561]

@miguelelgueta5830 N64 was also much more difficult to develop for, so releasing later was not necessarily an advantage since it took more time for developers to master it and to see games that used it really well.

[@Eichward_SKV]

The Playstation Version maybe looks and runs better. ut the N64 Version have the better gameplay.

[@sobesons]

PS1

[@misterniggo7635]

I haven't watched the video yet and i'm afraid to find out the ps version looks better than n64.

[@misterniggo7635]

FUCK, I was right. Game looks sharper, smoother, more dynamic in playstation tha n64. As a former n64 fan, it hurts deep to see the truth.

[@crazedlunatic43]

@@misterniggo7635 PS1 titles usually look sharper compared to N64 being rather blurry. However, it’s important to note that games that were directly ported from the PS1 usually tend to take full advantage of that system’s hardware and not so much about N64, hence why many cross platform games look and run worse than on PS1.

[@sebastiankulche]

​@@crazedlunatic43I wouldnt be surprise if some late PS1 games textures are made to accomodate the dithering better, as dithering is noticeable in early games but barely on the late gen.

[@bstar777777]

Did UBISoft even try or did the n64 suck that bad?

[@_SereneMango]

They did try with Rayman 2...

[@megabyteDeSu.]

PSX Wins!!!

[@M1XART]

Only F1 -games worth playing are F1 World Grand Prix 1 & 2 on N64.

[@davidaitken8503]

I was hoping I wouldn't have to be the only one to mention those two masterpieces by Paradigm, the same studio that made Pilotwings 64 and Beetle Adventure Racing. Those two games blow these Ubisoft turds out of the water.

[@lets.sketch]

Ps like 3d for snes There is no stability in 3D shapes which causes discomfort over timeCompletely unlike the n64 the game runs smoothly and the car simulation is realistic.

[@jonatasluciano208]

Eu tenho esse jogo para ps1 e um console baby ( ruim ) , no ps1 é melhor porque 128 bits é mais do que 64, simples.

[@Alinktome]

Ps1 has loadings before starts and at every restart. N64 is a real video game system.

[@clapiotis]

The 3d elements on PS seem to "dance". It reminds me of 3d Star Fox on Super NES.

[@maddrugamers]

Graficamente 64 - fluidez ps1

[@williams4379]

Joguei a versão de Nintendo 64 na época e vendo o comparativo achei melhor a versão de PlayStation. No Nintendo 64 as texturas, cores, efeitos de luz, e resolução ta inferior.

[@piccolo1906]

no expansion pack not a fair comparison

[@ender6747]

F1 World Grand Prix looks on N64 is way superior

[@flaviodossantos9723]

O N64 pra sua época poderia ser realmente muito mais potente, mas eles tinham que fazer milagres mesmo para o jogo caber em um cartucho com tão pouca memória, tivessem investido nos CDs os seus jogos seriam outra coisa mesmo o CD tendo suas desvantagens.

[@bloomerb4162]

Psx wouldnt last but a couple of years until your cd rom stopped working. N64 last forever.

[@commonsensei8719]

This is true, well not forever. But at least 100 years longer

[@crazedlunatic43]

Nothing lasts forever, but the N64 was definitely more reliable compared to PS1.

[@sebastiankulche]

I still have my OG PS1/PS2 and they work like if they were new.

[@bloomerb4162]

@sebastiankulche well you must be greasing the lens drive. And the spindle pop on disc would break off. Mine was a launch console and I never went back to Sony until ps4 pro. I took very good care of my ps1. I was luckily able to finish ff7 with the ps1 on its side.

[@Mechaghostman2]

The PS1 has higher res textures, the N64 has better everything else.

[@emersoncardoso4391]

A falta de memória no Nintendo 64 o fazia ser inferior a qquer plataforma da época, muito triste.

[@stocco4483]

ele tem quanto de memoria?

[@saulfabregwiivc]

4 MB of RAM.

[@BeefJerkey]

The PlayStation has less RAM than the N64. Unless you're talking about cartridge capacity versus CD capacity. But I think the actual problem is that the N64 was harder to program for. A lot of developers didn't know how to do it well.

[@fernandoduraes1]

mas a memória ram do nintendo 64 era superior ao play1, talvez esteja falando da mídia, acho que tivesse mídia de cd iria ter maior oportunidade de colocar mais elementos gráficos. n64 perde no fps, mas ganha na polidez dos gráficos, play 1 ganha no fps e na qualidade dos gráficos, mas perde na polidez deles.

[@LeonGal95]

¿A dónde están tus 64 bits, Nintendon't? 😆

[@مستشارليبيا-ط5ي]

نينتيندو 64 اقوى من البلايستيشن1 نينتيندو قيم كيوب اقوى من البلايستيشن2 Nintendo 64 ✅ ... Playstation 1 ❌ Nintendo Game Cube✅ Playstation 2❌

[@menoseloso119]

Idk I honestly prefer the softer, almost cartoony look of the N64 version. It has the color palette of a 50s cartoon that I find charming.

[@davidaitken8503]

The N64 version has a more realistic look with more shading and color gradations on the track as well as a more naturalistic sky. The car looks like it has a bit more shading on the N64 as well. Everything just looks a little flat on the Playstation version. To be fair some of this may have more to do with different outputs being used to display these two games as the Playstation game doesn't quite look like what the Playstation looked like on a CRT back in the day. Who really cares though. These two turds are completely blown away by the top notch F-1 World Grand Prix games on N64.

[@jameshollingshead6492]

N64 Rules

[@mateuszamadeusz6894]

N64 has smoother graphics

[@vitaobatera]

Dude the rear wang on PS is DANCING???? I just hate how PS has so much polygon warp and absolutely no texture filtering...

[@frxn211]

Texture filtering back then wasn't used as a norm, far from it. The n64 was unique to it, and to detriment to it's image quality, producing a very blurry image alongside the anti-aliasing due to the resolutions at the time being low. It was ahead of it's time, but texture filtering on such ugly low resolution files wasn't really a win. The PSX wobbliness could actually be fully prevented! but only a few devs ever put the work for it, like Quake 2.

[@sebastiankulche]

​@@frxn211For some reason the texture warping was always more "corrected", even fully fixed on later PS1 titles than the wobble effect of the polygons.

[@frxn211]

​@@sebastiankulchewobble effect was caused by a GPU limitation, lacking the z-buffer. Most 3D games from the time suffered wobble due to other reasons, so it didn't really stand out. It was extremely common even in 3D accelerators!

[@sebastiankulche]

@@frxn211 I know, it doesnt bother me too much like many people. I just find it curious that texture warping was generally less noticeable and more fixed over time

[@RAFAKSBR]

n64 tem raytracing quando o sol aparece!

[@TheGoffense313]

Back when Ubisoft had grand ambitions of becoming a mainstay in game developing. Now i wish they would just go away.. I'm looking at you Dragon Age Deilgaurd

[@n64fan60]

PS1 wins.