They REMOVED Harry’s True Discovery in the Mirror of Erised

[@inspector_beyond]

I kinda like how Snape turns to grab the Cloak in the movie. I know it wasn't intentional back in the day of the release, but I like to think that Snape got harassed so badly by James in that Cloak, to the point that years later Snape has a sence that somebody invisible is behind him 😅

[@catterin7815]

That sounds plausible. Personally I just assumed it had something to do with Snape being a Legilimens and he could sense a mind behind him.

[@deborahwalton-blanchard5817]

I figured it the same as you, he had experienced James in it and possibly had keener hearing and thought he heard breathing

[@howtohuman99]

Wouldn't be surprised if this was actually canon, ngl!

[@AnonCommenter-k5m]

yes its perfect, there is stuff hidden in early movies just for the book readers to be able to relate more to, and i think thats why the movies were so successful even though they still dont do the books justice and really needed to be longer or a tv series

[@catterin7815]

@@AnonCommenter-k5m As far as I know, the TV series is still in work and they were already casting. It's suppose to cover the books more closely with additions from JK. I'm hoping for the best.

[@kojinaoftheinvertedeye810]

Christmas at Hogwarts is just beautiful, like imagining walking through the halls, warm as they are in the first films, seeing all the decorations up and the joy in the air, that's a dream and don't get me started on having snow!

[@gdsf9839]

Absolutely, Christmas is a magical time in it's self & the Christmas scenes have always been my favourite parts & one of the main reasons I return again & again to rewatch the movies, I only wish there was much more Christmas (& winter time) content in all of the films. At 60 years of age I've been a huge fan of the magical fantasy genre since first reading The Hobbit as a young child & I can return to such movies like HP at any time but the Christmas scenes are definitely a huge highlight for me personally.

[@cs3742]

It's too bad the screenplay didn't take better advantage of Rupert Grint's really great acting ability. By shrinking his personality to dim they missed the chance for a funnier wingman character. Having Harry play straight man and Ron a quirky dude would have added to the movie as a whole.

[@seantlewis376]

Yes, Ron was not so "simple" as we see him in the movies. Ron is bright while being the best, bestest friend. He may not be the smartest or wisest of the students, but he always made good decisions, unlike Harry.

[@AnonCommenter-k5m]

Yeah Ron is his own character in the books, not just Harry's best mate, there are many classes the two dont even share together in the books later on in the hogwarts grades, but the movies dont even cover them, they only show the trio together always, even though in the books they were off doing their own things all the time

[@nhansen197]

It occurred to me that Harry ignores good advice from Ron on multiple occasions. The Chamber of Secrets might have been completely different if Harry had listened to Ron and not touched the diary. Ron's best moments were given to Hermione as is, and I like the book version of what Harry saw in the mirror best. Harry didn't just want his parents back, he wanted family.

[@Ladywizard]

Except then Ginny probably would have died even faster if Harry hadn't temp intercepted after all the Tom Riddle horcrux in the diary was siphoning her life force and couldn't be destroyed by water damage

[@kendraroth1276]

@@LadywizardNo she wouldn’t. Ginny was in trouble because she wrote in the diary again. Ginny would have been fine had Harry left it alone

[@kendraroth1276]

Also the first book would have ended sooner if Hermione listened to Ron.

[@MrPsyJak]

That's quite interesting, Dumbledore warning Harry about not wasting away in front of the mirror - it's reflected in the Peverell brother who got the Resurrection Stone.

[@factorfantasyweekly]

So true!

[@hollyroxy25]

And Harry is a Peverell brother descendant

[@dihydrogenmonoxide7056]

Also a bit hypocritical, considering how he treats the ring later. Dumbledore died because of that ring.

[@MatthewCaunsfield]

The Christmas scene was great fun, showing the teachers and other characters in a rare bit of downtime

[@larryrottenberk7771]

The Twins getting the first hits in the series on Voldemort is hilarious to me.

[@seantlewis376]

Knowing what we only learn much later, I think Dumbledore saw in the mirror either his sister, or Grindelwald, the two people he missed the most in his life. Also, I always ask for socks at Christmas. I may have been inspired by Dumbledore, but I really appreciate good socks.

[@sahaniperera3]

Videos like this is why a series is important. I hope they do a good job creating it.

[@DreadKyller]

One might watch the movies and think that Ron seeing himself as Quidditch Captain and Head Boy as his hearts greatest desire is really very shallow, but in the book Dumbledore explains how it's because Ron is almost always the last thought of member of the Weasleys, every other member has something they've achieved, either being really popular, getting excellent grades, going on to be rather important of influential in some capacity, while he gets all the hand-me-downs, and who's greatest achievement so far is to be friends with someone else who also meets those criteria, this feeling of inadequacy and feeling of being the least appreciated member of the family comes back up in multiple books to be really important, it's a large part of why Ron stops talking to Harry for a while in Goblet of Fire, it's referenced in Deathly Hallows with the locket scene, and those are just the obvious ones. What he saw in the mirror was himself being recognized as being important, not ignored, not forgotten, to be successful.

[@101Waylander]

I’m so glad I found your channel, I really appreciate your work.

[@factorfantasyweekly]

Welcome to the community!

[@arianeboutin6295]

What I get from this video is that I need to read the books again. It's so sad because if Harry sees all his family, it's mean that they are all dead coincided with what Dumbledore saying at the beginning of the movie that the Dursley's are his only family left. So, his 4 grand-parents, the brothers and sisters (i don't know how many) of James and their's children too. Sad when I start thinking about it as an adult 😓

[@kristineweber8084]

Actually, I think we learn later that James was an only child, which does fit nicely with him being a bit of a brat when he was younger. But there would have been grandparents!

[@MrEffectfilms]

People need to understand that movies don't have the luxury of time that books do, with film simplicity is key. If you never read the book the movie still makes perfect sense and tells a great story all it's own. Perfect adaptation for a movie will never happen, so filmmakers just make the best movies they can.

[@MavenWalsh]

That and it comes down to the screenwriter/director being ill suited for the job. Kloves deliberately destroyed Ron's character in favor of his idealized version of Hermione. That was just the first film, As the series went on, they started inserting things that weren't even in the books. HBP, why follow the book when they could write some awful story about teenage romance. TDH were the only films that wre better than the books.

[@matthewrosenthal753]

@@MavenWalsh I disagree on one point. The final battle in the films is a total let down. The books Final Battle was epic and Cinematic. The actual confrontation between Harry and Voldemort in the great hall, in front of everyone, and Voldemort’s myth being destroyed by everyone seeing him fall and die as just a man was absolutely epic. What was done in the films was a nearly complete rewrite of an absolute masterpiece and nearly ruins the whole thing.

[@veryfrozen3271]

​@@matthewrosenthal753good argument the movie had 2 whole ass movies for the last book they definitely coulda gone big the last fight. It really did end super fast

[@deborahwalton-blanchard5817]

@@MavenWalshit’s believed, given that Rowling had final say, that they included it to keep the tone of the movie lighter and more age appropriate to those under 20.

[@MavenWalsh]

@@veryfrozen3271 They only followed the books. That was the final battle. Forget what Sirius said about Voldemort having had an entire army of Death Eaters + Dark Creatures from the first war. No, we got a few dozen DEs, two giants and some spiders. A total letdown. But book 7 was a rushed, half-finished piece of work. Rowling needed 2 more years.

[@ronaldsmith6829]

I really liked the movies. However the books were considerably better. Which is normal.

[@winterrain1947]

Same. Books give more insight and details. Movies cannot allow you to see into the mind of the character.

[@christianburnett236]

Agreed! But I honestly I don't care what anyone or the actors say about Harry Potter. However it's a shame Daniel, Emma and perhaps others betray JK Rowling just because, she had a different opinion about society rather being another butt kisser such as them.

[@winterrain1947]

@@christianburnett236 Agree! I was quite disgusted that they would practically socially exile JKR due to having an opinion that was not the same as their own!"

[@novantha1]

I have a hot take: I think that people who say “books are better than the movies” can’t read. To clarify, I’m not saying that they misread the books, but rather, they misread the movies. Movies convey information in different ways, and I find a lot of people who prefer books tend to just not be wired to think about information conveyed visually. They don’t necessarily pay attention to the cuts between scenes, or the framing, blocking, leading lines, etc. It’s easy to say “oh, the book had this, the movie didn’t have this”, but it’s a different medium with different time constraints, and often a lot of what gets cut is usually conveyed at least conceptually or by feeling in some other scene. It’s also worth noting that not all detail is equal, and time is valuable. To me a piece of media that conveys 80% of the idea in 3 hours can be a superior experience to a piece of media that conveys 99% in 40. The pacing and density of the thing is also quite impactful to the purity of the experience, and it does change how one experiences that media for the first time in a dramatic way, I feel.

[@ronaldsmith6829]

@@novantha1 I agree. However I don't agree too!😆 The very reason I agree is why movies by their nature are much inferior to the book because of the lack of details. Like for instance, not including anything about Hermionie's attempts at raising money to help House Elves. And the fact it was explained, very patiently, to her that you can't 'help' someone who doesn't want to be helped! I found Peeves thoroughly obnoxious and understand why they axed him. However, it also reduced the story considerably to do so. Hence you are absolutely right and at the same time illustrate my point that Movies are an very much inferior medium to tell a story.

[@ghostlywitch87]

It was never truly said what dumbledores desire was, he said it was socks but I believe his true desire was to change the course of events that killed his sister

[@sanddagger36]

I really enjoyed the movies at first, but after seeing how Ron's character got shafted repeatedly, i've started to really despise them.

[@Frilleon]

Understandable

[@toodlescae]

I blame the screenwriter. He admitted he preferred Hermione's character.

[@Elfrida-ls2mo]

​@@toodlescaeHe is Lying she was already bright They Changed a small part of Rons Character to make Harrys Character look more bright and less of a bore also to make Harry more Likeable As Harry was the Main Character and Hero So the Changes were obviously done for Harry's Character Not for H However I had to Lol A Man trying to blame A Female No Surprise

[@cs3742]

t's too bad the screenplay didn't take better advantage of Rupert Grint's really great acting ability. By shrinking his personality to dim they missed the chance for a funnier wingman character. Having Harry play straight man and Ron a quirky dude would have added to the movie as a whole.

[@sanddagger36]

@cs3742 Instead we got gaping mouth harry It wasn't just Rupert who was under used

[@jmw9904]

Snape and Quirrel are having a quarrel.

[@phyllcar]

I constantly kept telling my wife about the differences in the book during the movies. For me the books were more explanatory about different things happening to different people than the movies and sometimes it seemed as if a scene wasn’t completely clear without the knowledge of the books. To this day, I still enjoy reading the books opposed to watching the movies!

[@robinchapman7222]

Peeves is another character not in the movies.

[@chtal64147]

Im really mad that we havent seen the snowball joke of the twins. Those are scenes you don't cut out to safe time! They are too funny. Hopefully the new series will show that part haha. And peeves! We need peeves

[@sw4194]

I always had a question that what happened to the other Potters... I mean, they were ancient wizard lineage tracong back to the Peverells, so they must have branched out family tree, like the Blacks. Atleast James's parents, cousins, if not the older generations...

[@robinfarrar3493]

I watched the first three movies before reading any of the books. It was a huge plus because, the books completed the movies, I already knew how to pronounce some of the more uncommon names, and the first three movies still are in no way a let down from the books. From the fourth movie on however…I’ve got a few *DISCREPANCIES!*. ~ Dumbledore said calmly. Honestly, THAT, they had zero footage regarding the quidditch tournament, and during the final battle they weren’t surrounded by an audience for Harry to reveal whose side Snape had truly been on the whole time; I’m happy with the movies. I feel like a lot of people are happiest with the first two and the last two movies. The first two (I felt) were certainly the most accurate to the books (for what time allows for regarding film vs. book). The last two movies, I feel like they realized they had to break up into two parts because they had left so much out of preceding films that was actually important after all. So to make everything make sense, they were forced to make the DH two movies. Of the cut scenes from ALL the movies, the only one that truly bothers me was the one where Draco throws Harry his wand. They *really* should have left that one in.

[@ForeverDegenerate]

No it really wouldn't have. I'm glad they removed that scene. People who argue FOR Draco tossing Harry his wand are idiots. Harry ALREADY HAD A WAND ON HIM. Why would he need another one?! Voldemort never took Harry's Wand because that's how arrogant and cocky and sure of himself he was. He believed Narcissa at face value when she "confirmed" Harry's death. So Voldemort, in his arrogance, didn't see a need to disarm a corpse. Draco tossing Harry his wand is pointless. It's like, "Ok great. Now I have two of Draco's Wands.... the Hell am I supposed to do with this?!" It speaks to Voldemort's character and solidifies who he really was that Harry never needed another wand to defend himself because Voldemort neglected to take the Wand on him. Also, Harry never used his wand against Voldemort so Voldemort might not have even known Harry had a wand on him. Hell, he might have just assumed Harry showed up with no wand. Still shows his character that he didn't bother to search the body. If they REALLY wanted to give Draco some redemption, they should have changed his character arc completely and had him stay with the school instead of leave with his parents. Having Draco tell Voldemort off when he sees Harry's lifeless corpse is far better redemption than having him toss Harry a wand he doesn't need, disarming himself in the middle of a war in the process. Congratulations, your Mother is now the sole line of defense for your family and Harry now has two wands. You have accomplished nothing.

[@fruitfulconnoisseur]

Another difference in the wizard's chess they mentioned you forgot that when one chess piece fights another it doesn't beat them they have to fight to determine which piece wins

[@krishnavandewalle9459]

Hey did Ron dirty in the movie

[@danielledewitt1]

?

[@krishnavandewalle9459]

@@danielledewitt1 I mean, ron in the books was much more admirable than in the movie

[@danielledewitt1]

@@krishnavandewalle9459 You said hey did Ron dirty.

[@aliostrowski1935]

He eventually gets a family in the weasleys and eventually has kids himself and does survive to see them into adulthood

[@tamarasmith9060]

Although most changes in the movies are to simplify filming to save time & not overuse costly computerized special effects, I think they could've & should've shown the others in the mirror too instead of just his parents. Yes the strongest part of his longing is for the parents, but it would show that even at that age he's aware that having a larger extended family including the elder generations typically gives people even greater happiness through more people to love, more shared experiences, & greater security (because when a hard time hits 1 member/couple then the rest of the family helps them through it in a "pay it forward" kind of way). He could've had younger siblings, he could've had grandparents to pass on wisdom & "uncles" (dad's best friends) & maybe even his mom would've after a bit (since they both had boys close in age) found a way to use common ground to reconcile with her sister & Harry could've had a good relationship with Dudley from much younger. He already knew that to most people "family" is a greater experience than just having parents. Showing that he realized he was missing out on a lot of things rather than just a few makes the emotional impact of the scene stronger.

[@michelleweintraub945]

Movies sometimes have to simplify things because they don’t have the time needed to create deeper emotional content. A writer is able to create deeper content because they can make a book as long as they want and also it’s easier to put things in words than to create a scene in a movie. I think the movies were adapted very well, I also have the advantage of seeing the movies first and reading the books second. But even after reading the books, I still think the movies were done very well. There are even things that I like better in the movies and then there are things that I feel that they should have kept it the way it was in the book. In the end, it is a wonderful story that is timeless.

[@AnonCommenter-k5m]

Did you know that Mrs Norris is actually Filch's wife who refuses to come out of her animagus form due to the trauma she faced as a young animagus back in a time when animagus where hunted and enslaved, why do you think the cat was only petrified by the basilisk instead of killed like any non magical blood creature should be killed

[@rodmason964]

Wasn't Moaning Myrtle killed by the basilisk?

[@dorrivix4214]

I wonder what this series of movies would've been like had they done what they did with book 7 and split them all into denser, more book accurate movies. (of course, I know movies take a lot of time to make and the actors would've aged further in the movies than they should, but it's more of a what if than anything.)

[@CJ-im2uu]

The British will put gifts at the foot of the bed, rather than around a tree. The book also stated only Harry and the Weaselet's did not go home.

[@bjdefilippo447]

I didn't realize this, but it explains my childhood Christmases. Mum always left a full stocking of goodies at the foot of the bed, but then we'd go to the tree after dad (American) woke up, and we opened presents there. I had no idea she was finding a way to blend their traditions.

[@bailatwerski2951]

The Harry Potter Books are way better than the movies!!! The first movie was the best dor me because it kept to the book mostly & you have a the amazing sets, Diagon Alley & the shops, Gringotts Bank, Hogwarts etc!!!

[@christianburnett236]

The one thing about science fiction and fantasy/dark fantasy is they mix well, but still have to be done right though, but normally easy to blend together.

[@Neakco]

I always wondered why, when he sees the mirror again at the end of the book, he uses what Ron saw as his lie instead of what he had first seen.

[@jessicapinto3817]

What Ron said about the mirror is in a deleted scene! Or scene from the extended version

[@Powermaster14]

There was a deleted scene that they were in the great hall harry just stares at the fireplace thinking wearing the jumper that ron's mon made him and tried to stop him thinking about it

[@stephengrenleski1972]

They probably didn't include everyone Harry saw in the Mirror because if the viewer never read the book, they wouldn't have understood who all the extra people were beyond Harry's father and mother.

[@ScarlettR4364]

Peeves was also removed from all movies.

[@dtch4497]

peeves is removed from all movies as well

[@riogrande5761]

Changes are always an issue with books vs. movie.

[@erictayet]

When I'm reading and forming mental picture, yes whole family makes more sense. But for movie goers who has never read the book, it's more impactful to the audience to only see Harry's dead parents.

[@dominaevillae28]

It didn’t make sense to have Hermione be an expert on the wizarding world instead of Ron.

[@hamitcampos4989]

The ron seen is on DVD 2 in the deleted seens. they did film it.

[@jackpowell9276]

Ron was absolutely done dirty in the films. Ron is the only one in the trio born into the magical world. That completely shifts his perspective from the other 2 as he thinks in a "magic first" way. He also has all the knowledge a magic born would have, that you wouldn't learn at school, especially early on. Knowledge of just how things are in their world, childhood tales, intuition about magic and its risks, especially with wisdom from his father. He comes from one of the sacred 28 families, and has a large family working in many interesting areas, with many older brothers. That knowledge and perspective is key throughout the books. Hermione might be the book smart one, but she isn't born of that world.

[@windangel7720]

Books are almost always better than the movie. It would really be impossible to translate the books to the movies, and the movies are fantastic. When the first one came out I thought Harry Potter would be the stupidest thing, but then I watched it and though it was utterly charming. Then once I read the books, I was hooked. As I read the later books, I had an understanding of the meaning of Dumbledore seeing socks. But of course now I can't remember. I think it's time for a reread. 😊

[@2muchcoffee]

Socks remind me of Dobby Dumbledore probably saw it coming

[@bjdefilippo447]

I'm wondering if you would be willing to note in the title which episode each is. I'm trying to catch up with this series, but it's difficult to tell the order just from the title. Thanks for the interesting takes! BTW, I'm pretty sure the job title is "gamekeeper", with no "s".

[@factorfantasyweekly]

Thanks for the suggestion! The best way to binge watch and keep your order is to check out the series playlists (in the description and on my channel) and all the episodes are in order top to bottom!

[@chichiboypumpi]

Voldy was with Quirell and still trusted Snape

[@hana-jq3uh]

Please tell me What did dumbledore saw? I don't remember reading about it

[@KAC710]

I haven't really thought of these books or movies since grade school, but I can't believe it never occurred to me how bizarre it is that the wizarding world celebrated the birth of Jesus? Talk about world-breaking...

[@janrudnicki6111]

Very good

[@RoboCario]

Yea dinner is anouther word us brits use instead of lunch. But we say lunch as well, both words meaning the same thing. They get used interchangebly. But we always say Christmas dinner, not Christmas lunch. I think maybe because its much more of a bigger meal saying Christmas dinner makes more sense? Lunch just sounds like a small meal like a sandwich or something... And if your wondering about the other meal of the day since dinner is used as the same thing as lunch. It actually gets called Tea, or tea time. And no it doesn't necessarily mean theres lots of tea being drunk XD. Ita littrally just the 3rd meal of the day tea time. But somwhat confusingly tea , somtimes gets called dinner too. I think maybe it just describes a big meal in general. Cos ive used the word for both lunch and tea time. I can see how its confusing to people who not brought uo here, but makes sense to me XD. But either way Christmas dinner is lunch time. Normally anyway.

[@phosphorus4]

Wait what about supper?

[@RoboCario]

@phosphorus4 I forgot that, thats the 4th meal of the day

[@jf_kein_k8590]

If this series is ever remade (preferably as an animated series divided by seasons), then they should heed more to the characters as they were in the books. (Or take ideas from the fandom to chage the story completely. Like the Slytherin Champion change for an idea)

[@troglodyte8791]

more so how did Harry know it were his parents? the dursleys did not talk about them and had no pictures or anything about his parents

[@quantemwensday]

10:20 it has WHAT on it

[@kitkat3548]

P - Percy))

[@quantemwensday]

@@kitkat3548 is that how that word is spelled? well i gotta go take a percy I can't hold it in any longer if I do I'll just percy myself

[@kitkat3548]

@@quantemwensday if the spelling is the only thing you can nag about, go on))

[@quantemwensday]

@@kitkat3548 you don't have to get all percy about it Mr percy pants wasn't nagging on or about anything you're probably being all percy because you've been holding it all in for to long Mr percy pants

[@danielledewitt1]

@@quantemwensdayYes Percy is spelt that way.

[@timmellor2599]

Ron's role in the film is a bit clownish, broken by moments of wizarding exposition. Those rare moments come when it would be too much for Hermione to know literally everything, but quite normal for a pure blood wizard living with his family. I guess we all understand why Ron is portrayed as he is in the films, but he is a useful reference for Harry who feels the absence of this upbringing.

[@JennyShull]

Too bad the Harry Potter Characters don’t know what the readers and viewers know. To me what makes the Harry Potter books and movies sad: The characters are trapped in an endless loop. Doomed to re peat the story over and over again from start to end. With no memories of what is going to happen to them. Whenever someone reads the books and watches the movies. When the characters are not being use they are trapped in a dark, endless, void waiting to be used by someone.

[@davidh9844]

Hey, there is so much incorporated into the books, you could never film it all. The cutting was done wisely. If you or the kids want to know more after seeing the film, READ! They are wonderful.

[@elwoodbrown2431]

So are there multiple versions of harry potter books. talking chess parts? i read them. never read that

[@danielledewitt1]

Then you never read them.

[@elwoodbrown2431]

@@danielledewitt1 i have. it only says they move.

[@danielledewitt1]

@@elwoodbrown2431 Talking chess pieces is in the books.

[@kristineweber8084]

Sometimes you have to read a book multiple times to fully catch all the interesting bits. Our minds skim the text because there's so much to take in. Now I'm going to go back to the first one to look for the talking chess pieces!

[@ernestocardenas2001]

The books are best in the movies

[@stuartlivingstone1265]

Funny how the American version differs from the uk one's..

[@danielledewitt1]

I have the uk version of the books and nothing is different.

[@janelleramler6440]

Only difference is the name in the title of the first book. Philosopher vs sorcerer

[@nager1997]

@@janelleramler6440 there is more than that. The American version of the books changes words and spelling. Plus some phrases are Americanised. But otherwise the story is exactly the same just more American in tone

[@janelleramler6440]

@ oh that’s weird. I didn’t know that. I read the philosopher’s stone and was under the impression that was the only change.

[@nager1997]

@@janelleramler6440 like for example a cricket bat becomes a baseball bat. A jumper a sweater. Woollen vs woolen Towards vs toward. Realize vs realise. Or how in the uk version of the first book during a moment at Hagrids, he gives the trio rock cakes to eat whereas in the American version of that moment he gives them rock cakes and a description of what they are is added but only in the American one. So that’s really the gist of things.

[@inverclacky]

Kwirl? KWIRL? It's pronounced Kwi-Rel!!!!!

[@WilliamWizer]

the books. no questions asked. unless the original work was a complete mess, adapting from a book/movie/theater/... to any other is guaranteed to drop quality. there's a handful exceptions due to mismatching. jurasic park being a great example since it's an action story that swaps from book to movie and movies are the best to show intense action. but harry potter is a story that was made for books. you can't adapt it to movies without a loss of quality. my hope is in the show since it's not as limited in duration so it can take it slow when needed. but I'm almost sure the books will still be the best.

[@elwoodbrown2431]

Giiibbbay

[@GaryTongue-zn5di]

Erised is Desire spelt backwards.

[@factorfantasyweekly]

Why did I never notice that before? 😂 Now that you say it, it seems so obvious…

[@Armedus]

🤯

[@toodlescae]

​@@factorfantasyweeklyThe inscription on the frame read backwards says: I show not your face but your heart's desire.

[@factorfantasyweekly]

😮

[@frankhooper7871]

@@toodlescae You mean: ɘɿiƨɘb ƨ'tɿɒɘʜ ɿυoγ tυd ɘɔɒʇ ɿυoγ ton woʜƨ I