Dear Argentina, this is what a real country's infrastructure looks like
@JoaoPedro-qm2nc4 жыл бұрын
Don't let Argentines see this video if they don't die. Greetings from Brazil.
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini4 жыл бұрын
Go judge your own country bigot!
@BridishBuffoon3 жыл бұрын
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini Says the literal warmonger in the comment section of this video.
@andrestorres45453 жыл бұрын
jajajajaja!!!!, Un "país" real seria si no viviece de la pirateria "hombre", jajajaja, andaaaaa, son piratas ustedes!; asi todo han firmado 4 rendiciones incondicionales, 4 veces rechazo Argentina invasiones inglesas, y si queres te digo los años, las fechas, andaaaaa.... "País" enserio, que no pueden derrotar aun "País" del octavo mundo bananero como el nuestro, son una verguenza ustedes!, suerte con en Brexit y la Union Europea!, ah!... y con Rusia tambien. Saludos Pirata!.
@R.R.Defensa2 жыл бұрын
@@andrestorres4545 Los Britanicos están a años Luz de ustedes Argentos ... los tiene lavando baños en UK
@estellemelodimitchell82594 жыл бұрын
The landscape and weather look so much like northern Scotland, with barren land devoid of trees and snow.
@jackmorgan16773 жыл бұрын
Just like in Scotland, the animals are eating everything. Without the deer in Scotland there would be scrubs and trees, without the many sheep there would be vegetation in the Falklands. The Faroe Islands has the same issue, bare hills because of too many sheep eating everything.
@gingerbaker43903 жыл бұрын
@@jackmorgan1677 Have you actually been there. ?
@badgastein24 жыл бұрын
The top layers of tarmac were first applied (1985/86) to a very deep dry lean (concrete) base of the main and secondary runways of Mount Pleasant Airport. This is not to be confused with the very much smaller airport at Port Stanley some 30 miles or so from here. No airport here is named after Shackleton, that was the name given to the resurfacing and refurbishing project which this video depicts. The asphalt was presumably relaid because the old tarmac was 25 years old and worn, and the landing lights, hydraulic arrestor gear and power and fibre optic cable replaced or re-routed to suit new technology. The concrete base will probably be good for 100+ years, it’s the tarmac that wears out. The materials would have been driven by lorry from the harbour to the airfield about 8 miles away. (I worked on the original).
@dusty44592 жыл бұрын
I just watched a video of the original work. Nice job. kzbin.info/www/bejne/eYa4g6N4r9mnqKM
@jordividal32134 жыл бұрын
So many angry Argentinians commenting here... If the people living in the islands want to remain British, let them be. Same as Gibraltar.
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini4 жыл бұрын
bullshit lie. Those are British territories Britain uses the whole "self determination" crap to hide its agendas behind.
@paulc21304 жыл бұрын
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini What agenda ? Bellend.
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini4 жыл бұрын
@@paulc2130 You're calling 'ME' a "bellend", and you don't even know what a country's international agenda in the world means?
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini4 жыл бұрын
@@paulc2130 I suppose you need me to spoon feed you the explanation of what government international non official geopolitical projects and goals are. Get out of the way please, if you got nothing to say, but condescending put downs (as usual)
@paulc21304 жыл бұрын
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini So answer the question Bellend....
@chrissheppard50685 жыл бұрын
I served on the Island for a year starting from April 78. We lived in an old hut which had been lane derelict for 30 years until the Royal marines chamferred it up to live in. Absolutely no money was put into a proposed new barracks which was wished to be sited near the airport along with a plan to quickly blow up the airfield with pre-planned and readied mines. Billions of dollars later...........and I had an extra visit in 82.
@jwadaow4 жыл бұрын
Write about it. A book or just a blog!
@dogsnads56343 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't have made any difference...it was an amphibious landing.
@chrissheppard50683 жыл бұрын
@@dogsnads5634 The airport was of massive importance and its destruction would have caused them lot of problem's.
@scopex27493 жыл бұрын
I was there in 1984 on the Chinooks, we were based out at Kelly's Garden (San Carlos). WE kept them flying in all weathes delivering ONE container at a time to get them started at MP! I worked on the mighty VC10 many moons ago and it pleased me to see them still flying then from the airport, but sadly now they replaced them with some crap aircraft! Loved it down there, I would love to go back but i retire in a few years and Im no millionaire so doubt I'll ever see the Islands again. We got there on a troop ship and came home on SS UGANDA a gem of a ship sadly she is now long gone too. All the best to the forces in the Falklands!
@kingfishermoviesonyoutube3 жыл бұрын
Looks like another wonderful achievement! I was lucky to be involved in the very first contract in 1986! Well done Colas!
@colingoldthorpe5918 Жыл бұрын
Man I landed here in 1989 for a 6 month tour, 6 months later America, 4 months later Desert Storm, 6 months later Belfast, 1 year later Bosnia 6 months later Canada and 1 year later I was retired and moving to Canada 😎😎😎 28 years later I’m an old man 🤣🤣🤣 since been to all of the USA, China, Korea and India with work. Be nice to travel nowhere
@gerryryan23025 жыл бұрын
I forget ..who was the contractor ? Seems very vague !
@estellemelodimitchell82595 жыл бұрын
There’s so much space for more people on the Falklands. Even if the population increase 10 folds, it is still way under populated.
@chrissheppard50683 жыл бұрын
A lot of wind swept barren space.
@allanelder2711 Жыл бұрын
I recall reading in some Falkland Islands Government literature some years ago that the people can emigrate from Britain to the the Islands as long as they have useful skills or want to establish a business.
@jasonhughes16744 жыл бұрын
I’d like to thank the veterans and those that gave their lives during this conflict, also I’d like to thank the Argentine Junta under Galtieri for helping Britain to get it’s shit together over the Falklands. Gracias.
@raquelalvarez2962 жыл бұрын
POR LA DERROTA ARG AFUUUUUERA LA DICTADURA NO OS OLVIDEIS
@gingerbaker43903 жыл бұрын
They should build a road network. It doesn't have to be extensive, but something that will connect and link the various outlying areas. They can use natural resources such as hard rock, ballast and volcanic clay already existing on the islands.
@geoffreybexon-cg5cl Жыл бұрын
Nahhhh leave the islands wild, makes it a haven for the wildlife and much more difficult for the Argentinians to invade
@jorgemarcelobana61 Жыл бұрын
Very interesting and I like the precision work in that difficult zone, congratulations. With respect
@lachlanlandreth90695 жыл бұрын
That is interesting. Just finished watching the Doco on the Original construction of the base in 1983
@alfie4troy5 жыл бұрын
You get the impression colas did some work down there
@andersonsroad51615 жыл бұрын
Looks like the argentinians shouldn't expect to get their hands on the Falklands anytime soon.... the Brits are really settling in for the long haul.
@kcimb5 жыл бұрын
Andersons Road you could have said that in 1833 when the English returned to the island and setup shop pemtnanently. The people are Englishmen through and through.
@andersonsroad51615 жыл бұрын
@@kcimb Whatever the historical arguments are it part of the UK now by force of arms. The UK is demonstrably ready to kill to keep it question is are the bean eaters willing to die trying to take it.......
@kcimb5 жыл бұрын
Andersons Road for the 4th or 5th time. It is English, now and forever
@andersonsroad51615 жыл бұрын
@@kcimb Relax buddy, I'm on your side.
@Foxtrottangoabc5 жыл бұрын
Yeh we've already been here over 200yrs ! 💪🙂
@PhillipMorton5 жыл бұрын
so what the hell was Project Shakelton? An extra runway or taxiways or what?
@Dave_Sisson5 жыл бұрын
It's strange that they didn't say what they were actually doing, but it was just resurfacing the runway at Mount Pleasant. www.ceequal.com/case-studies/project-shackleton-falkland-islands-runway-resurfacing-project/
@allanelder2711 Жыл бұрын
Refurbishment of existing runways and electrical cabling.
@trevorhart5455 жыл бұрын
Colas, what a wonderful piece of publicity, well done. In my ignorance I did not know the new airfield was dedicated to Shackleton, so thank you for educating a 60+ year old Prior to this I was watching a video of RN Phantoms "burning up" the US Saratoga flight deck, quite literary.
@andyreading5 жыл бұрын
i am so proud of my countrymen and women , so proud my body has problems containing my heart , but alas i am so ashamed of our politicians.
@anthonygoodwin47322 жыл бұрын
It looks so different to how it did 40 years and a couple of weeks ago…..Per Mare Per Terram
@NickNZ5 жыл бұрын
Surprised COLAS didn’t put stickers on the aircraft
@otablott77795 жыл бұрын
Loooool
@TheRedDevil_NC4 жыл бұрын
Impressive build project. Argentina couldnt do it. The Islands will always be British even if England isnt any longer.
@celsoalejandromorales64525 жыл бұрын
Resolution UN ( ONU ) 20 / 65 of descolonized
@celsoalejandromorales64525 жыл бұрын
@Gar exactly
@andrestorres45455 жыл бұрын
@Gar Si Sr, de la ONU!. siguen siendo COLONIA si estan bajo bandera britanica, si se independizan unicamente serian un país pero si siguen bajo en manto britanico...
@jwadaow4 жыл бұрын
UN charter of self determination.
@celsoalejandromorales64524 жыл бұрын
@@jwadaow isnot nort pole Malvinas, autodeterminación isnot isnot válido in thai case
@andrestorres45454 жыл бұрын
@@jwadaow eso todavia queda a determinar hermano... Lamentablemente, la ONU exige sentarse al Reino Unido y negociar con Argentina, sinceramente me gustaria que termine esta guerra que no termino y que algun dia las Falklands o Malvinas sean un pais independiente del Reino Unido y de Argentina, del continente Americano, como lo son Canada, Australia, Nueva Zelanda, etc. Es mi mas sincera opinion hermano. Saludos.
@loadofstuff105 жыл бұрын
I love those corporate videos, funny as fuck being told how fucking great they are..
@adamwsaxe4 жыл бұрын
Sooo . . . what exactly got built?
@R.R.Defensa3 жыл бұрын
VIVA UK VIVA CHILE PARTNERSHIP FOR EVER
@flycan6413 жыл бұрын
eso crees?? hasta que los piratas ingleses decidan tomar por la fuerza alguna isla chilena.
@R.R.Defensa3 жыл бұрын
@@flycan641 No te Preocupes Vive mientras Puedas
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
🇬🇧❤🇨🇱
@R.R.Defensa2 жыл бұрын
@@jackwhitehead5233 Thanks RAF 🇬🇧 For the Last AWACS SENTRYS 3D 🇨🇱🤝🇬🇧🍻
@charlescp70 Жыл бұрын
@@flycan641 son de fiar no así uds.
@R.R.Defensa3 жыл бұрын
ESTE AEROPUERTO CONSTRUIDO POR LOS BRITANICOS ES MEJOR QUE CUALQUIER BASE MILITAR ARGENTINA JAJAJAJA 🤣 😜 SALUDOS DESDE CHILE 🇨🇱🤝🇬🇧
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
🇬🇧❤🇨🇱
@albertocarrizo88092 жыл бұрын
Nada nada que ver , ese aeropuerto es un aeropuerto basico de doble uso , implican mas gastos y retrasos las bases militares ARGENTINAS estan hechas especificamente solo para uso militar o de exportacion. Ah y para tu mente que se quedo retrasada en 1982 , Chile y Argentina somos aliados y Chile apoya la soberania argentina en Malvinas.Saludos
@gabyfromhell12 жыл бұрын
Todo lo que quieras, pero la Patagonia se la sacamos , quedaron en un pasillo A JAJAJAJA 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
@antonroug2022 Жыл бұрын
@@gabyfromhell1 pero este oasillo tiene más de 3.000 islas ,incluso la más lejana es RAPA NUI🗿🗿🗿y está a 3.765 kms y es de CHILE ,las falklands islands están a pocos 600 kms y son de tus padres ingleses, recuerda "LOS COBARDES SE RINDEN EN SU PROPIA CASA " Y LOS VIOLAN 👉👌🥺🥺🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@charlescp70 Жыл бұрын
Robando son experto. Igual disfruta del ají Falkland en donde tu sabes, gauchito poto pelado. Te dejamos sin isla, Chile e Inglaterra aliados por siempre.
@Daimo835 жыл бұрын
Talking of "mobilisation" when it was probably planned 12 months in advance
@264Rockape10 жыл бұрын
I wonder how many employees are ex forces?
@cesarwaltermigueles95625 жыл бұрын
No solo invierten para afincarse ....aun mas.., sino porque es el salto a la Antartida ..y lo.mas preciafo pata ellos..nuestra Patagonia...
@kyleJohn19975 жыл бұрын
Colas just reminding the Argentinans to back off
@enzoborettini82525 жыл бұрын
Jajaja los Argentinos retroceden, pero antes te diezma la flota naval...
@nathd17485 жыл бұрын
@@enzoborettini8252 Your NAVAL FLEET?? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Biggest laugh of the week. Your submarines run on Diesel and blow up killing your naval crews. Meanwhile our nuclear powered Astute class subs can HEAR every single ship that leaves the shore in Argentina....all the way from the Falklands!!! Your NAVAL FORCE won't get far this time matey. You will find the ships are sinking before you have even found your bunks!!
@ezequieltedesco13735 жыл бұрын
Nath D But your fleet is sleeping with SpongeBob
@kyleJohn19975 жыл бұрын
@@ezequieltedesco1373 Well so is the Belgrano
@ezequieltedesco13735 жыл бұрын
Kyle Presley One
@icdas71588 жыл бұрын
air-bridge arriving on time - really hummmmmmmmmmmmmmm
@manuelaguilar15885 жыл бұрын
Malvinas argentinas viva la patria carajo soy estado unidense ,pero muy orgulloso de llevar sangre latina
@ivangodbold2925 жыл бұрын
never.
@emilianoalvarez71915 жыл бұрын
@@ivangodbold292 always Argentinian Island
@ezequieltedesco13735 жыл бұрын
Gracias amigo
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
Lmao 649 Argie corpses suggest otherwise 🇬🇧😂😘
@desmondobrien682 жыл бұрын
Still British
@archiebald47173 жыл бұрын
Argentinian friends, this is what a modern developed country looks like.
@flycan6413 жыл бұрын
I agree, but you built it on Argentinian land...
@user-we5gv1bh9d3 жыл бұрын
@@flycan641 put you flag on the island for more then five years and as well as get the land owners of the, "Falkland islands". To agreeing to becoming Argentina. Then maybe then you can claim the island's.
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@rubenalarcon31065 жыл бұрын
Recuperaremos lo que es nuestro por derecho
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
Look forward to sending more Argies back to their slums in body bags 😘
@JVSPOTTCHILE978 Жыл бұрын
🇨🇱🤝🇬🇧
@miltonmonzon6703 Жыл бұрын
Jajaja te bajaste los pantalones con los ingleses, no tuvieron dignidad los chilenos
@zigongosaurus52748 ай бұрын
@@miltonmonzon6703Argentina was literally about to invade Chile around the same time so no shit theyd side with us
@eduardoguzman2765 жыл бұрын
**🇦🇷ISLAS MALVINAS 🇦🇷** SOBERANÍA NACIONAL DE LA REPÚBLICA ARGENTINA . Nuestra causa sigue siendo justa, contra los usurpadores .
@keithlillis79624 жыл бұрын
Los isleños son ciudadanos británicos y desean seguir siéndolo. Si bien eso sigue siendo cierto, el gobierno del Reino Unido los protegerá.
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
Come and get your islands then, the British military has weapons to test and if they're aimed at Argies then it technically counts as pest control 😘
@raquelalvarez2962 жыл бұрын
@@jackwhitehead5233 XXI EL SIGLO DE ARGENTINA ARRRRRRRRRRSADA CAPITAL CIUDADES ALEPO SIRIA DE SUD AMERICA ARDE ARDE
@Twirlyhead5 жыл бұрын
All that for some cola - must love their soft drinks down there.
@abelrivas37265 жыл бұрын
Hacen emprendimientos en un territorio que no les pertenece, y apuntan a la Antártida....es evidente
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@MrManu03713 жыл бұрын
Las Malvinas, Georgias y Sándwich del Sur son Argentinas 🇦🇷
@littleshep55023 жыл бұрын
Except they arent
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
649 Argie corpses suggest otherwise 😘
@Jaspa-hw6wd2 жыл бұрын
No they aren’t I live in the Falklands, fuck off baddy, you are sad about loosing a war that happened 40 years ago grow and move on, we want to remain British
@desmondobrien682 жыл бұрын
1982 decided otherwise!
@juandemalvinas5 жыл бұрын
MALVINAS ARGENTINAS! Pirates, we will return!!!!!
@juandemalvinas5 жыл бұрын
@@j.4354 If you mean the last dictatorship, it was from 1976 to 1983, which does not take away our right to claim for our territory, usurped in 1833 by the United Kingdom, we all know that the Malvinas are Argentine, and that the British position is merely imperialist and military strategist should give you shame!
@jeffreyskoritowski41145 жыл бұрын
Argentina's militaty is in even worse shape now than it was in 82. What exactly do you expect to accomplish? How many times do the Brits have to teach you this lesson?
@jeffreyskoritowski41145 жыл бұрын
@@juandemalvinas Didn't the inhabitants vote to remain in Commonwealth? Also the only reason the junta invaded the FALKLANDS was to gain popularity for their illegal regime. However, if you're willing to try again with Argentina's bad economy and underfunded and understaffed military you'll find her majesties armed forces ready to receive you.
@jeffreyskoritowski41145 жыл бұрын
Go home Argie, your drunk.
@jeffreyskoritowski41145 жыл бұрын
@@j.4354 savage m8
@lordbadman92645 жыл бұрын
Always been a Mr Pibb fan
@biof4ker1615 жыл бұрын
correccion se dise malvinas no falklands
@ivangodbold2925 жыл бұрын
never heard of malvinas.
@patrickmcneil764 жыл бұрын
Why all this expense for a barren rock? I’ve heard there is oil in the waters, so why don’t they drill already. I don’t understand this waste of resources
@wally10ize4 жыл бұрын
They have been drilling. Look up Rockhopper.
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini3 жыл бұрын
@UC47ffkI5n1OlDjzThXVXVvg We should be angry, in fact Argentina is not angry enough in my opinion. This is a conflict that has to do with the world's countries honoring and respecting each other as equal nations entitled to the same mature acknowledgment of every issue that would be important to ones own nation. When you stop reading only British sourced material, and learn what actually happened on the Falkland Malvinas Islands, not the narrative the English language consciously has been disseminating and indirectly educating the world with, you see that there is indeed a strong argument on behalf of Argentina in terms of them having had earned greater sovereignty right to the islands by 1820 than Britain possessed at that point, by political definition. However Britain, as it considers its wishes and wants above any notion of respect and equality among the nations the world, has always used its far greater wealth and military power to incur invade meddle with and intervene in South America (and the world) in particular Argentina. ...I bet you have no idea how many military incursions Britain carried out against Argentina throughout history. Britain knew Argentina had a strong case in 1833 for the islands now being rightfully belonging to their administration, but instead of arguing and settling with them by recognizing Argentina's case and their own governments absence neglect and lesser political substance of their own claim, which originated in its confrontation against Spain for colonial domination of the islands, while Argentina though it appeared in the dispute last in terms of it being a Republic, came to the scene with the islands already put within the government of Buenos Aires's administration by Spain since 1776, and was the first country to endow the islands with and actual integral national sovereignty, and "a possible colonial claim". I bet you didn't know that either. Nonetheless, Britain simply decided to forcefully take them from Argentina at a moment it could not defend itself in part because it had just recently been unjustly and abusively attacked by the United States. Never in 150 years until 1982 did Britain ever take Argentina seriously nor respected their continual protests and claim enough to truly mean to pursue an honorable resolution and settlement to the conflict, offensively blackmailing the country with commercial favor and phony friendship in exchange for silence over the dispute. It immediately proceeded to create a strategy to forge the islands away from Argentina while ignorning the dispute; a ploy fake construct of legitimacy which cleverly changed the notions of "invasive colony or occupation" to the term "British Overseas Territory". Britain then used principals which would have been inapplicable to a political international dispute and conflicted situation through putting its own people on the islands as a human shield and then vesting their significance with values of sovereignty like "right to self determination". By doing this Britain intentionally confused the situaion and silence the real argument by still to this day painting over the past and true history of usurpation of an Argentine territory and making it about a colonial situation, misinforming the world and keeping it from paying attention to the real history that occurred, and other facts like for example that the islanders were brought to the islands after expelling Argentina for the purpose of having them fight for the right to the islands when the time came. This is how London attempts to avoid facing justice for its actions making it a situation to do with "a non self governing territory's people decision", rather than the truth which was an action committed against Argentina on Argentine territory, giving rise to this dispute born in 1833. In other words, Britain would have people believe this is about two countries fighting over an independent piece of land, when what actually occurred is that Argentina had incorporated to its territory a geographically necessarily belonging part of land that had been disputed between Britain and Spain, and that ultimately Britain being on the other side of the globe, de-prioritized and never managed to settle and establish administration on, nor of it, having been present on the islands for barely four years 50 years prior to Argentina's official inclusion to its territory. You can see British strategy still going on today, by for example noticing how Britain was quick to make sure that the headlines the world read in 1982 and everything that would be said thereafter never told the story that the Junta invaded in order to recuperate these islands that were occupied by Britain in 1833 after expelling the Argentinians off them first, nor that it was Britain who decided to use the force of war in 1982 once more to take them from Argentina. Argentina did not start a war in 1982, it merely took back and recuperated territory that had been taken from them originally. Britain never sought a peaceful resolution, because it needed the action to be seen as an attack on its territory so that it had an excuse to create a war on the islands. The British intentionally educate people to believe their strategic narrative through the selection of phrases like "Argentina invaded British territory". Through explanations of political principals on of how for example they run their British Overseas Territories, Britain audaciously is looking to change in front of everyone's noses the definition and description of international matters such as colonial expansionism, by using and fake prioritizing the importance of the residents of these places, so that essentially it can hide its own objectives and get away with stealing, while it has the world believe it behaves nobly.
@alanstevens88963 жыл бұрын
Very informative,but the "brass tacks" are that the majority of the People who live on the Islands see themselves as British.Sadly what happened in the 1800's doesn't have much bearing in 2021.The French don't have a problem with the Channel Islands being part of the UK.......and they are SO much nearer to France than Argentina is to the Falklands.Its not like Argentina is overpopulated......is it?Maybe the Argentinians will control "Las Malvinas" one day,but it will only happen once the "Brits" have left the Falklands.
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini3 жыл бұрын
@@alanstevens8896 This conflict dispute is historical, and based on an event of forceful usurpation that was diplomatically never forgiven by Argentina. It is not about the war to recuperate the islands in 1982, nor about the islanders themselves. If anything the islanders should be complaining to Britain about putting them intentionally in harms way not just once, but twice! If we are to respect each other as nations in this world, nations of equal right to be acknowledged and honored, things can not be as you and your country are attempting to forge and twist them. The principle of a people's right to self determination may very well be an issue between the islanders and London, but not between the islanders and Argentina as the conflict is between the British and the Argentinians. The islanders do not fit the qualification of an integrally autonomous sovereignty of themselves, and thus nor are they relevant to the list of non self governing territories at the U.N, as they have always been since their arrival on the islands willingly under British rule and moreover brought to the islands to serve in the purpose of unlawful expansionism by shielding London from having to deal before the world with Argentina about their denouncement of this territory they consider robbed from them. ... You and your country can keep trying to re-define this matter, attempt to bury events concerning Argentina and its right to nationhood, you can keep trying to turn this into some politically capricious contemporary matter centered around the war of 82 and the islanders falsely accusing Argentina of, but the facts about it, the fact that neither Britain nor the United States possessed any right to attack and remove the lawfully established Argentine settlement in 1820, are never going to change as they have been laid down already in history by all the recorded events concerning all three countries, therefore unchangeable.
@alanstevens88963 жыл бұрын
Patrick,you are obviously a well educated man,unlike me who only went to a "Secondary Modern" School.The ultimate irony there is that someone I know,who is a few years older than me was with Colonel H Jones of the 2nd Battalion the Parachute Regiment who lost his life whilst in the Falklands,during the war there in 1982.So Britain has run the Falklands since 1833,nearly 190 years.So you are saying that Britain "stole" the Islands from Argentina in 1820.Can't argue with that,only alot of Countries were invading other ones at that time.Lets see now,I believe that the ethnic origin of nearly 97% of Argentinians is European.By the way,my ethnicity is 91.7% English,and 8.3% Scandinavian.So you can say that my ancestors are English.....and have been for a very long time.I would imagine that the original occupants of Argentina would have been native Indians? So when Spain conquered Argentina,they must have killed alot of the "Natives" in the process? So pray tell me,what's the difference between that,and Britain booting out Argentinians from the Falklands in 1820? They had nearly 150 years to win them back,so why did it take until 1982 for that to happen? While we're on the subject of not very nice People;what about the fact that between 1939 to 1945,Britain and her Allies were trying to save the World from one Adolf Hitler,whilst Argentinian was giving the Nazis shelter? Rumour has it that Hitler fled to Argentina after the War,lived there for many years,then went to Chile I believe,and died there in 1971.....personally I don't believe that,but I saw it on a TV programme recently,and the person who said that was.......Argentinian.I have no argument with the Argentinian People,who I believe are very hospitable,and kind.The Falklands War can be blamed on one person......General Galtieri,who was a Dictator,in trouble at the time,and thought...."I know a way out of my problems....."I'll invade the Malvinas,and get it back for Argentina .......thus making me,VERY POPULAR." The rest Patrick...is History.
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini3 жыл бұрын
@@alanstevens8896 You touched on too many different things to give you just one response to your comment Alan. There are about 10 different points that we could argue each one of them in terms of what it was all really about. If the world is going to "work it out" and solve its political sovereignty issues and confrontations, we have to draw a line somewhere, somewhere sensible where we can work with realities still existing and comprehensibly represented. That would mean all modern nations today represented at the United Nations. Otherwise we could keep moving the bar back to oblivion in the necessary premise of seeking justice for everyone, not just a few of us. In this sense the old civilizations destroyed by the Spanish, Portuguese, English, French, Dutch and Germans are too far gone and dissolved to draw any reasonable construction of justice through representation. That's why people like the Mapuche in Chile and Argentina are shouting a bunch of lies based on righteous sounding ideologies that in truth would not be about these arbitrarily mixed people. On the other hand, Britain and Argentina were both here in their present form during the 1830's, during the creation of the U.N. and now. Is war the answer to you? Shouldn't we be praising Argentina for patiently hanging on the diplomatic means for 187 years already? Isn't that what supposedly the world and countries like Britain purport to want for the world? To resolve things diplomatically? The point is about respecting each and looking for a just way to end conflicts, and seek a fair compensating solution, like split the islands in half for example, not exploit one's superior military and economic power to disrespect and ignore the importance a people give a historical conflict that is about land taken from that people. What your logic is proposing is that as a world we should say to countries that are weaker poorer and needier of good relations with others to whom injustice was committed to by a stronger one, "oh well!! tough! get over it!" Do you think that is how countries should drive the world forward? By the law of the jungle?
@alanstevens88963 жыл бұрын
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini Patrick,I don't think that War is the answer to problems,but sometimes it appears that is the only course of action available......sadly.As long as the People on the Falklands/Malvinas want to stay British,I can't see any other solution to the issue,than they stay as they are.Can't remember if I mentioned this to you,but here goes.I don't know if you are aware of the Channel Islands just off the Coast of France,but they are British.We are not talking 400 miles here,more like 30 or more.France could try and claim them,but they haven't as far as I know.On one of the Islands....Jersey,they speak "Jersey French," which is a mixture of French and English.There are quite a few French place names on Jersey,maybe the French think,as their Country is so big.......they don't need any more Land.Argentina is very big as well,unlike the UK which is overcrowded,and not very big,with a population of about 60 Million.
@jorgecano67105 жыл бұрын
Que cagazoooo nos tienen actualmente por favor !!!!
@deepthought33165 жыл бұрын
If we stay in the EU We'll probably have to give the islands to Argentina... Jo Swinson and co. bring it on....
@briangiles30285 жыл бұрын
What a stupid comment!!!
@sid35gb5 жыл бұрын
And the Irish will get back Northern Ireland when we leave, the Scottish will leave and rejoin the EU. And Great Britain the United Kingdom will be no more Brexiteers are the real traitors.
@carlalexanderlukas5 жыл бұрын
By staying with France and Netherlands and other states with overseas territories in the EU has actually made them vote in favour of UK rule over the islands.. by leaving the EU they could theoretically turn against us in the UN as they kinda have started to do with the Chaigos Islands issue.. that said if Jeremy Corbyn wins he would leave every colony UK has but that has nothing to do with the EU.
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini5 жыл бұрын
"The Robbed Territory"
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini5 жыл бұрын
No, we are talking about the Malvinas Islands.
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini5 жыл бұрын
@Gar Sorry about your misinformed belief, but NO. It is known that Britain was NOT the first to sight or land on the Islands, the possibilities are a few, including that of Piti Reis they Turkish commander, it is possible that the British were the first to set foot or sail into the canal, as well as not the first. But the Dutch are who are believed to have discovered the Islands and named them. The French were the first ones to build a settlement which is ultimately the only thing that really counts. The Spanish then made justice on their original territorial claim and officially bought whatever rights the French had earned, which entitled them to kick the British off the Western Island. And 2, by the time Britain "lay its unlawful claim", they were already Spanish Territory, in fact the British knew this and thought they could try to get away with sneaking in Port Egmont anyways, and yet eventually yielded back to Spain and abandoned Port Egmont. In fact evidence of a robbing policy is the fact that they never went back to Port Egmont, but took the Islands from the Argentine on the Eastern Island which they had never set foot on. The British left as always antagonistically, because all they've ever done in this world is bring discord fight and war to the peaceful existence of people. While Spain was at that point still in the process of civilizing the old world giving equal rights under god to all people in conquered. Very different to how Britain treated its colonized subjects it would put to work for his Majesty, take their resources and managed the business "their way" through slaves and so forth. Spain did not have "colonies," that word comes from English History. Spain made province type autonomous territories often with local governors. The Southern Cone and Malvinas was part of the Viceroyalty of the River Plate, with capital in BUENOS AIRES. We had the strongest world currency, and Britain basically was jealous and wanted to undermine and have all that Spain had earned. The Viceroyalty, became the United Provinces with capital in BUENOS AIRES, and the United Provinces became Argentina with capital, Buenos Aires. When Spain retreated in 1811 from the Malvinas because of Argentina, Argentina rightfully inherited its abandoned territories through its victory. No one in South America contests that, that's why they all support the Argentine claim (unless they want to kiss the IMF, the U.S. or U.K.'s ass. Britain did not seize the Islands upon Spain's retreat, it waited for the right contextual situation, lied to Argentina like a thief about being its ally, while it forcefully removed the Islands Argentinian loyal occupants during a key moment of weakness caused by ... no other than the U.S. pirate attack on Puerto Soledad. Why? Because they did not want laws and rules, they wanted to scavenge. The U.S. and U.K. are famous for tag team robbing territories, like they did with Diego Garcia, the Virgin Islands and other Caribbean "situations". It looks to me you have been exclusively educated by the British propagandist narrative taught to the British people and the Islanders; because you seem to know nothing other that what concerns Britain's convenient version of events, though self servingly false it may be. Like what is currently taught about WW2, "my little savoir of the world, liberator of the Jews hero" LOL lol In fact, the English language is today definitely the greatest producer of lies in human history out of all the world's literary history, and people in both America and the England are both starting to admit that. Luckily. Unfortunately uncovering the unforgivable truth of the millions both our countries have murdered in order to control AND USE the world. You don't actually believe Galtieri was stupid enough to go straight into a losing war do you? You do, don't you? Just like you believe Britain came reaaaaaallyyy close to not winning that war. LOL Perhaps ... caring more about your own education would be my advice to you.
@GH-oi2jf4 жыл бұрын
Patrick Edgar Regini - The problem with that argument is that when Argentina tried to assert control over the islands, they captured South Georgia. There is zero Argentine or Spanish history in South Georgia to support an Argentine claim. South Georgia history is 100% British until the 1982 invasion. It all comes down to this: Argentina tried to take territory from the UK by force, thinking nothing could be done about it. The result was war, in which Argentina was soundly defeated. That settles the matter, as far as I am concerned. If Argentina ever attacks again, I hope the UK will have the means and the will to destroy every military base in Argentina. I would rather there was peace. That will come when Argentina formally relinquishes their phony claims.
@garwhittaker37434 жыл бұрын
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini Well just take a look at the counties left behind from UK-SPANISH colonialism..... UK = USA , CANADA, AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND. SPAIN = Corrupt shitholes.
@Jaspa-hw6wd2 жыл бұрын
Fuck of bitches, Falkland British forever I want to remain British living in the Falklands
@danielferreyra56095 жыл бұрын
Que bueno tienen todo un ejército completo más armamento de largo alcance aaaaa pero nosotros no podemos tener lo mismo porque su papi Norteamérica se enoja. Siempre el padre cuidando y limpiándole el culo al hijo. Pero bueno así están las cosas por algo en las películas siempre salen como piratas es lamentable
@nathd17485 жыл бұрын
They speak English in the Falklands....not Spanish.
@nathd17485 жыл бұрын
@@pedroacdc7770You guys just can't accept it can you not? Boohoo!
@@ellibanes7153 Only in your dreams....until you wake up for a piss!! Argentina can't even get its shit together at HOME never mind some islands hundreds of miles away!!
@ellibanes71535 жыл бұрын
Ya vamos a ver ja ja
@christusvincit10675 жыл бұрын
Las Islas Malvinas, Georgias y Sandwich del sur, todo su mar adyacente, plataforma submarina y porción antartica ¡¡¡ FUERON, SON Y SERÁN SIEMPRE ARGENTINAS !!!
@falkland2233 жыл бұрын
Mírame yo también soy argentino “las Islas Malvinas fueron son y serán siempre argentinas”🤡🤡🤡😂😂😂
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
Why aren't they Argentine then? Are you too scared to take your islands back? Coward 🤡
@desmondobrien682 жыл бұрын
Still British!
@Senna-xi1gr5 жыл бұрын
Are it’s an ad👎🏽
@ellibanes71535 жыл бұрын
Ya vamos a recuperarlas y apoderarnos de sus mujeres de las islas !!
@cristianeduardoguerralobos64325 жыл бұрын
jajajajaja
@ezequieltedesco13735 жыл бұрын
Son frías, se hacen las sexys pero no te calientan mucho, al menos las yankis anglas . Las probé en Usa
@alejandroroke33624 жыл бұрын
Típico del medio oriente fanáticos y violadores
@ellibanes71534 жыл бұрын
@@alejandroroke3362 hayy. Que paso ? Un arabe te robo tu mujer ??
@thir6714 жыл бұрын
Pensamiento de asesino el tuyo por eso Isarel los castiga a cada rato , por irrespetuosos
@carlosvalle87125 жыл бұрын
Me embarga la impotencia malditos sean
@pablolasowski28315 жыл бұрын
La culpa no es de ellos...en parte también es de nuestros políticos hdp's ladrones!!!
@jimmyhillschin99874 жыл бұрын
@@pablolasowski2831 Es una tragedia terrible la forma en que los argentinos, un buen pueblo, han sido adoctrinados para ver a las Malvinas como territorio esencial. Los británicos solo quieren dejar a los kelpers para vivir sus vidas, pero la agresión y la actitud colonial significa que estos trabajos son necesarios para proteger a estas personas pacíficas que no amenazan a nadie.
@pablolasowski28314 жыл бұрын
@@jimmyhillschin9987 me parece interesante tu visión, es respetable y hay verla desde un arista e interpretarla porque también es valida!!! Saludos.
@joaquin29664 жыл бұрын
Jimmy Hill's Chin puede que las personas sean pacíficas, pero las verdaderas personas pacíficas dueñas de ese territorio fueron asesinadas por los ingleses y los Kelpers que ves como pacificos no son mas que una semilla que aseguró a UK las islas.
@jimmyhillschin99874 жыл бұрын
@@joaquin2966 La dominación española en América del Sur estaba asegurada por ríos de sangre. Comparado con esto, lo que sucedió en las Malvinas no es nada.
@pablolasowski28315 жыл бұрын
Es triste ver como mientras los Ingleses y Kelpers progresan construyendo en las Islas en continente los políticos de turno se la pasan en disputas por poder, dinero, clientelismo y el país teniendolo todo no avanza. Un ejemplo salta a la vista, en las Islas estan proyectando la pavimentación haciendo rutas y calles con material de construcción de primera calidad, mientras tanto en las provincias patagónicas no te levantan una ciudad un aeropuerto o un nuevo puerto ni por chiste porque no solo están en la pelea política de ver quien se la lleva mejor sino que nunca hay preusupuesto o el del partido tal se lo traba rn el congreso al del otro partido y también que por ejemplo en la provincia de Buenos Aires si un intendente manda a hacer una obra es un bacheo de mala calidad o calles que de un año para otro terminan requesbrajadas partidas llenas de pozos porque inflan un presupuesto por un valor cuando el coste de los materiales usados son bajos dada la baja calidad, conclusión pasan un presupuesto por un número, compran por uno inferior y se quedan con el vuelto y las calles parecen sacadas de un paisaje lunar. Así no se puede progresar, así no podemos cambiar de mentalidad, uno puede pedir y decir que las Malvinas son Argentinas pero la verdad y la realidad va a ser que en un futuro nos vamos a quedar azorados con las frases en la boca porque del otro lado vamos a ver algo tan insuperable que nunca podremos alcanzar. Esa es la verdad. Lo lamento por mi país Argentina al que amo con mi vida.
@sedmalte26895 ай бұрын
Argentina es una sociedad muy corrupta tristemente. leed libro de Marcos Aguinis!
@otablott77795 жыл бұрын
Colas Typhoon
@marcosrincon57815 жыл бұрын
malvinas parlebu france exocet
@nicolasmartinelli15845 жыл бұрын
Me hiciste la noche con ese comentario. Te pasaste 🤣🤣🤣
@eldurkiiipetruski78965 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@nicolasmartinelli15845 жыл бұрын
@@eldurkiiipetruski7896 No, es que encima es solo para entendidos, porque hay que averiguar lo que fue el uso del exocet!! Tremendo!!! me reia solo a la madrugada 😂😂
@eldurkiiipetruski78965 жыл бұрын
@@nicolasmartinelli1584 como no saber la historia q marco al mundo....
@marcosrincon57815 жыл бұрын
@Gar Ladrón usupador que seguramente no hablas castellano sometete a la ONU si no te gusta el exhocet Pensa en el Condor
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini5 жыл бұрын
Sorry about your misinformed belief, but NO. It is known that Britain was NOT the first to sight or land on the Islands, the possibilities are a few, including that of Piti Reis the Turkish commander, it is possible that the British were the first to set foot or sail into the canal, as well as not the first. But the Dutch are who are believed to have discovered the Islands and named them. The French were the first ones to build a settlement which is ultimately the only thing that really counts. The Spanish then made justice on their original territorial claim and officially bought whatever rights the French had earned, which entitled them to kick the British off the Western Island. And 2, by the time Britain "lay its unlawful claim", they were already Spanish Territory, in fact the British knew this and thought they could try to get away with sneaking in Port Egmont anyways, and yet eventually yielded back to Spain and abandoned Port Egmont. In fact evidence of a robbing policy is the fact that they never went back to Port Egmont, but took the Islands from the Argentine on the Eastern Island which they had never set foot on. The British left as always antagonistically, because all they've ever done in this world is bring discord fight and war to the peaceful existence of people. While Spain was at that point still in the process of civilizing the old world giving equal rights under god to all people in conquered. Very different to how Britain treated its colonized subjects it would put to work for his Majesty, take their resources and managed the business "their way" through slaves and so forth. Spain did not have "colonies," that word comes from English History. Spain made province type autonomous territories often with local governors. The Southern Cone and Malvinas was part of the Vice-royalty of the Plata River, with capital in BUENOS AIRES. We had the strongest world currency, and Britain basically was jealous and wanted to undermine and have all that Spain had earned. The Vice-royalty, became the United Provinces with capital in BUENOS AIRES, and the United Provinces became Argentina with capital, Buenos Aires. When Spain retreated in 1811 from the Malvinas because of Argentina, Argentina rightfully inherited its abandoned territories through its victory. No one in South America contests that, that's why they all support the Argentine claim (unless they want to kiss the IMF, the U.S. or U.K.'s ass of course). Britain did not seize the Islands upon Spain's retreat, it waited for the right contextual situation, lied to Argentina like a thief about being its ally and friend (same as 82, tag team once more, this time going against the O.A.S.), while it forcefully removed the Islands Argentinian loyal occupants during a key moment of weakness caused by ... no other than the U.S. pirate attack on Puerto Soledad. Why? Because they did not want laws and rules, they wanted to scavenge the land. The U.S. and U.K. are famous for tag team robbing territories, like they did with Diego Garcia, the Virgin Islands and other Caribbean "situations". It looks to me you have been exclusively educated by the British propagandist narrative taught to the British people and the Islanders; because you seem to know nothing other that what concerns Britain's convenient version of events, though self servingly false it may be. Like what is currently taught about WW2, "my little savoir of the world, liberator of the Jews hero" LOL lol In fact, the English language is today definitely the greatest producer of lies in human history out of all the world's literary history, and people in both America and the England are both starting to admit that. Luckily. Unfortunately uncovering the unforgivable truth of the millions both our countries have murdered in order to control AND USE the world. You don't actually believe Galtieri was stupid enough to go straight into a losing war do you? You do, don't you? Just like you believe Britain came reaaaaaallyyy close to not winning that war. LOL Perhaps ... caring more about your own education would be my advice to you.
@loyalist57364 жыл бұрын
Britain were first to land and claim so all you say is bullshit.
@daveh10813 жыл бұрын
Stop moaning. The Falkland islanders want to remain British so get over it you bore! Concentrate on issues closer to home eh......god knows you've enough of them.
@nehemiasgumbau13994 жыл бұрын
Rivales británicos gracias por mantenernos las islas gratis 👍👋🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
Britannia invicta 🇬🇧
@charlescp70 Жыл бұрын
Sueñen qué serán suyas algún día. Falkland, Malvinas no existen
@santiagocolines86465 жыл бұрын
Go home britihs soldiers go home... Piratas, fak rats...!!!!! Go home...!🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀
@guillermoclavero58075 жыл бұрын
Malvinas !!! The english are Piratys
@ivangodbold2925 жыл бұрын
they are home.love britain.god save the queen .falkland islanders we have your backs.by the way argentina you owe the uk money for the 1982 war you waged.
@ezequieltedesco13735 жыл бұрын
Gar Are you Gar or Gay ?? The second
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
Lmao, on the subject of rats, how about all those drowned rats on the Belgrano? Biggest loss of life in the entire war 😂 Look forward to Argentina's second invasion, you may have lied about how many of you died last time, but I look forward to hearing about more of you dying next time. I wonder who screamed louder, the cowards that the gurkhas slowly cut to pieces with their knives, or the whore mothers of the Argie soldiers when they found out their spawn had died 😂😘
@cesarwaltermigueles95625 жыл бұрын
MALVINAS ARGENTINAS🇦🇷
@cesarwaltermigueles95625 жыл бұрын
MIS RESPETOS A LOS SOLDADOS BRITANICOS QUE PERDIERON SUS VIDAS EN NUESTRAS MALVINAS...
@cesarwaltermigueles95625 жыл бұрын
@Gar ....mr, Engkis, so,eday we will see each other again , those are our lamds and you know it let,s avoid another war...MALVINAS ARGENTINAS,. MY RESPECTS TO THE INGLISH SOLDIERS WHO LOST THEIR LIVES.-
@loyalist57364 жыл бұрын
@@cesarwaltermigueles9562 Please don't test Britain in war , we are very experienced at it ...let's hope Argentina will move on and get its own affairs in order .
@falkland2233 жыл бұрын
Malvinas argentinas 🤡🤡🤡
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
British Falklands! 🇬🇧 Let's hope we don't have to kill anymore Argentines in the name of freedom!
@arg72415 жыл бұрын
Malvinas son y seran por siempre argentinaa es sólo cuestion de tiempo, no importa si es hoy o mañana simplemente esperar el momento.
@raquelalvarez3565 жыл бұрын
Soberanía BRITANICA TIENE BUENA ECONOMÍA POR SU GOBIERNO BRITÁNICO argentina ESTANCADA COMO SUDAMÉRICA
@rubenmazurek3755 жыл бұрын
la plataforma marina es argentina... legalmente es argentina... un abogado comun en una corte mundial imparcial gana el juicio y la tienen que devolver mas todo los costos en robar el pescado y el petroleo...
@DukeOfChirk5 жыл бұрын
obrbob194 I’m shocked... really shocked you said that! As a fellow Brit, what you SHOULD have said is “come on then, if you think you’re ‘ard enough”. lol. 😉
@rubenmazurek3755 жыл бұрын
@@DukeOfChirk las malvinas son argentinas...
@RichardTaylor-sx4tq5 жыл бұрын
Argies only showed interest in the Falklands when it became clear there were under water mining options, greedy lying toe rags ...
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini5 жыл бұрын
and "The Shameful War"
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini5 жыл бұрын
@Gar I see you don't understand why it was one of Britain's most dishonorable wars...
@loyalist57364 жыл бұрын
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini Please explain ?
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini4 жыл бұрын
@@loyalist5736 Argentina is not a warring country. Yet nonetheless it's one of the family of nations that are constantly bamboozled by the British and Americans after being foolish enough to think they needed to let themselves be lead by these two powers after winning their wars of independence. Britain has never been a friend to the Argentinians, though there are still convinced you have been, but the truth is that Britain has always tried to use and fool Argentina, both countries the U.S. and U.K, think of all of the ex Spanish Empire nations with insufferable bigotry and contempt. I know it because I grew up in America and I know very well how 'we' and you think about Hispanic countries. Britain has always exploited invasively Argentina's friendship and defenselessness, seeking always to first put its foot in through political and commercial relationships. Starting in 1806 and 1807, in 1845 and in 1982 as well though on the outside no one officially sees it that way. WHY!?? What has Argentina ever done to Britain?? 1982 was the only time there was a military backlash against 150 of insolence, ignoring our diplomatic protests. The military occupation exploited the sentiment of desired justice for the usurpation of 1833 in the Argentine people, but your bigotry completely intoxicates your narratives and story telling, it made sure to never treat that event as a territorial dispute more than token mentions. It constructed the international story as an invasion of British territory, though it wasn't. Nothing new in that relationship, one that is saturated with political manipulation, even supporting of the Generals during the 70's genocidal attack on their population. Britain abuses and uses Hispanic passivity and self weakness, their lack of confidence in themselves, from Belice to Jamaica, Cuba and Venezuela, Ecuador, you used Chile against Bolivia, Brazil against Argentina... Britain truly is the only enemy we have ever had, and its an lying enemy in disguise. Can you tell me WHY?? Why can't your country get its bloody claws out of our continent? Why does it want to contest everything that is part of our world? Always having something to say, something to meddle in!! You want ALL OF ANTARTICA! Even the part that is directly below Argentina? WhY? Why do you feel you have more right than others to this world? You're pigs you use friendship to rob the unsuspecting, that's what you've always done! In India, in China, in Africa and in South America. That's why the South Atlantic war for the Malvinas was Britain's war of Shame. Because you knew damn well Galtieri really believed Britain would negotiate, you fooled them and yet again attacked a country that thought of yours as a friend. You're phony users, and there's plenty of material that proves you knew what the Junta was planing and you intentionally let them step on the stick so you could manipulate and subjugate the Argentine people even more. WHY?? Again! What has Argentina ever done to Britain?? Why didn't you ever ask for a peaceful resolution to that conflict!? Because you didn't want one. OK?? You are simply a bastard country full of contempt for the world, except for those countries that are useful war allies too you, because you're users, because to Britain the world is still not a place humanity must share and find a way of living together in peace as equals, it still is the source of its own sustenance, and it covets it like someone who doesn't want others to know what they found.
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini4 жыл бұрын
@@loyalist5736 Do you still need more details? Do you think Britain did not know Argentina could not last more then three months fighting before it ran out of munitions? Do you not think British intelligence new one way or the other it was going to be an easy win, and that the U.S. was not going to make sure the U.K. won? Argentina rejected any real assistance by other countries. You should be ashamed of yourselves! Its soldiers were untrained conscripts from a society that is peaceful, of kids that do not grow up watching war and gore movies nor talking about bombing this country or that country, they are on the opposite end of the spectrum compared to your war mentality society of professional soldiers. Britain practically raped Argentina's innocence, a country that only had admiration and trust for Britain, just so it could have MORE MORE MORE of the world, regardless of justice, but it makes sure to bury that assessment and paint the generic war freedom vs dictators bullshit story. Your country's a disgrace. That's why it was your War of Shame. It was as easy as robbing from your own family, or rapped your best friend. This is the main reason why you try to make sure there is no distinction made between the Constitutional Nation and its people's cultural society "country", and the only ones who actually were responsible for using force to take back the islands, and who sprung the event secretly behind their people's backs, the Junta's Generals. The Argentinians never in a million years would have ever even thought of anything militaristic against Britain, even in fantasy they saw them as friends and Britain understood that very well. Yet Britain want's to make sure the world and especially the islanders don't understand the realism of that. It needs the islanders to think of Argentina as its enemy. And it makes sure that is the narrative that is installed. One can see this self evidently unfolding since the day the war ended until this very day, with every decision and event that occurs anywhere related to the South Atlantic. The war was needed, it was used, and it is being exploited. Britain always puts its foot in front of Argentina, and in front of any significant political progress towards sovereignty ex Spanish Empire nations attempt. ... It's what the British people are kept in the dark about, believing your fairy tales of merit progress and rightful honor. You're the bully rapists of the planet to be truthful.
@loyalist57364 жыл бұрын
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini LOL You can't half babble on about pure shit ....I tripped over blame the British, our economy is shit blame the British banks ..we invaded British territory and lost the war because of it lol ..Argentina were bullying its nabours and thought it could also bully Britain I mean what are they going to do about it so far away ....the rest is history. ...move on .
@angelicajuarez20744 жыл бұрын
Linda pista se ve fasilmente , inutilizable por saturacion
@leonardosouzadasilva50993 жыл бұрын
Las Malvinas son Argentinas. Saudações do Brasil 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷. Saludos hermanos.
@littleshep55023 жыл бұрын
Nope
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
Good joke loser 😂
@desmondobrien682 жыл бұрын
Still British!
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini3 жыл бұрын
This conflict dispute is historical, and based on an event of forceful usurpation that was diplomatically never forgiven by Argentina. It is not about the war to recuperate the islands in 1982, nor about the islanders themselves. If anything the islanders should be complaining to Britain about putting them intentionally in harms way not just once, but twice! If we are to respect each other as nations in this world, nations of equal right to be acknowledged and honored, things can not be as you and your country are attempting to forge and twist them. The principle of a people's right to self determination may very well be an issue between the islanders and London, but not between the islanders and Argentina as the conflict is between the British and the Argentinians. The islanders do not fit the qualification of an integrally autonomous sovereignty of themselves, and thus nor are they relevant to the list of non self governing territories at the U.N, as they have always been since their arrival on the islands willingly under British rule and moreover brought to the islands to serve in the purpose of unlawful expansionism by shielding London from having to deal before the world with Argentina about their denouncement of this territory they consider robbed from them. ... You and your country can keep trying to re-define this matter, attempt to bury events concerning Argentina and its right to nationhood, you can keep trying to turn this into some politically capricious contemporary matter centered around the war of 82 and the islanders falsely accusing Argentina of, but the facts about it, the fact that neither Britain nor the United States possessed any right to attack and remove the lawfully established Argentine settlement in 1820, are never going to change as they have been laid down already in history by all the recorded events concerning all three countries, therefore unchangeable.
@garwhittaker37433 жыл бұрын
If we are to respect each other lol ...Argentina bully and try to make life as hard as possible for the islanders in many diffrent ways economically mostly and trying to turn other countries in the region against them ..Grow up Argentina.
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini3 жыл бұрын
@@garwhittaker3743 You do realize you are beyond prejudicially bigoted with contempt, right? It's more like you have a rotting pretzel inside your brain.
@loyalist57362 жыл бұрын
@Patrick before Argentine troops were kicked off in 1982 alot of your soldiers shit in people's houses smeared it over peoples walls and even shit in people's beds and draws. ..No wonder they want nothing to do with them .
@rodrigoeduardofigueras9575 жыл бұрын
Sin palabras , piratas
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂🇬🇧
@Jaspa-hw6wd2 жыл бұрын
Fuck off you broke Argentina
@marcelogomez68595 жыл бұрын
MALVINAS !
@paulc21304 жыл бұрын
= Losers
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
FALKLANDS*
@raquelalvarez2962 жыл бұрын
SERAN ARRRRRRRASADOS XXI ARDE ARG HAY QUE PROBAR NUEVOS ARMAMENTOS UK ARGENTINOS CARNE DE CAÑON
@MaximilianoLibardi5 жыл бұрын
Ocupas Las Malvinas son Argentinas
@falkland2233 жыл бұрын
Y si son tan argentinas por que los argentinos no pueden entrar sin pasaporte 🤔🤔🤔
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
Come and get them coward
@gonzaloottati5 жыл бұрын
Menos mal que mostraron dónde quedan porque el pueblo ingles no saben ni de su existencia.
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
Lmao, that's the dumbest thing I've ever read. Seriously, does making things up lies like this actually help you get over Argentina's constant failures? -Failed to negotiate because you're too stupid -Failed to conquer the islands because you're cowards -Cannot run an economy to save your lives (and it cost 649+ of your lives 😂) Why doesn't Argentina try and be less pathetic instead of making up stories and claiming other people's things?
@desmondobrien682 жыл бұрын
Still British
@maianbelen45225 жыл бұрын
Pueden hacer las bases que quieran las islas son argentinas..pirate go home kelper go british island
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
Come and get them cowards. Maybe form another fascist government while you're at it. The British military can use you for target practice, meanwhile your dictator can murder your citizens like last time. Efficient pest control for Argies 😘
@guillermoclavero58075 жыл бұрын
Islas Malvinas !!!
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@albertoluzon90792 жыл бұрын
Malvinas argentinas gibraltar español ulster de Irlanda. Viva la hispanidad e Irlanda. Ingleses fuera de territorios qe no son suyos
@desmondobrien682 жыл бұрын
Idiot
@antonroug2022 Жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧😉👍
@martinbarba76895 жыл бұрын
Paid with the fish stolen from argentinian sea...
@steveforster97645 жыл бұрын
Tonto
@benwilson61455 жыл бұрын
sounds fishy, maybe the one that got away?
@sparkytr5 жыл бұрын
Wait what? That’s what the EUSSR are doing to us but we have not lost a war.
@kyleJohn19975 жыл бұрын
@@benwilson6145 what like a whole island 😂😂
@TheKasselhof5 жыл бұрын
@@andersonsroad5161 cuando bienen a buscar la docena de barcos que les hundimos??
@catriel88735 жыл бұрын
Malvinas*
@catriel88735 жыл бұрын
@Gar ajjajaja idiot
@catriel88735 жыл бұрын
@Gar su-35 + su 34 = malvinas argentinas
@catriel88735 жыл бұрын
@Gar we can blow them up in falklands with condor lol
@catriel88735 жыл бұрын
@Gar traducilo Boludo británico
@catriel88735 жыл бұрын
@Gar que
@DiegoGarcia-st7si5 жыл бұрын
Malvinas Argentinas
@j.boylan33435 жыл бұрын
Dont be silly.
@DiegoGarcia-st7si5 жыл бұрын
@@j.boylan3343 No seas arcaico. Estamos en el siglo XXI, por si no te enteraste. Estúpido.
@DiegoGarcia-st7si5 жыл бұрын
@Gar La razón tiene mucha más fuerza que tus aviones de juguete.
@DiegoGarcia-st7si5 жыл бұрын
@Gar Usá el traductor de google. Bruto ladrón.
@DiegoGarcia-st7si5 жыл бұрын
@Gar Pero comprendes lo que digo. Muy bien.
@flycan6413 жыл бұрын
Islas Malvinas Argentinas
@littleshep55023 жыл бұрын
Nope
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
Good joke 😂
@eldurkiiipetruski78965 жыл бұрын
Malvinas argentinas
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@leandroamerise45923 жыл бұрын
las Malvinas fueron son y serán argentinas!!!
@littleshep55023 жыл бұрын
Nope
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
Good joke 😂
@leonardosouzadasilva50993 жыл бұрын
1982 - today. Las Malvinas son Argentinas
@littleshep55023 жыл бұрын
Nope
@jackwhitehead52332 жыл бұрын
Good joke 😂
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini5 жыл бұрын
Sorry about your misinformed belief, but NO. It is known that Britain was NOT the first to sight or land on the Islands, the possibilities are a few, including that of Piti Reis the Turkish commander, it is possible that the British were the first to set foot or sail into the canal, as well as not the first. But the Dutch are who are believed to have discovered the Islands and named them. The French were the first ones to build a settlement which is ultimately the only thing that really counts. The Spanish then made justice on their original territorial claim and officially bought whatever rights the French had earned, which entitled them to kick the British off the Western Island. And 2, by the time Britain "lay its unlawful claim", they were already Spanish Territory, in fact the British knew this and thought they could try to get away with sneaking in Port Egmont anyways, and yet eventually yielded back to Spain and abandoned Port Egmont. In fact evidence of a robbing policy is the fact that they never went back to Port Egmont, but took the Islands from the Argentine on the Eastern Island which they had never set foot on. The British left as always antagonistically, because all they've ever done in this world is bring discord fight and war to the peaceful existence of people. While Spain was at that point still in the process of civilizing the old world giving equal rights under god to all people in conquered. Very different to how Britain treated its colonized subjects it would put to work for his Majesty, take their resources and managed the business "their way" through slaves and so forth. Spain did not have "colonies," that word comes from English History. Spain made province type autonomous territories often with local governors. The Southern Cone and Malvinas was part of the Vice-royalty of the Plata River, with capital in BUENOS AIRES. We had the strongest world currency, and Britain basically was jealous and wanted to undermine and have all that Spain had earned. The Vice-royalty, became the United Provinces with capital in BUENOS AIRES, and the United Provinces became Argentina with capital, Buenos Aires. When Spain retreated in 1811 from the Malvinas because of Argentina, Argentina rightfully inherited its abandoned territories through its victory. No one in South America contests that, that's why they all support the Argentine claim (unless they want to kiss the IMF, the U.S. or U.K.'s ass of course). Britain did not seize the Islands upon Spain's retreat, it waited for the right contextual situation, lied to Argentina like a thief about being its ally and friend (same as 82, tag team once more, this time going against the O.A.S.), while it forcefully removed the Islands Argentinian loyal occupants during a key moment of weakness caused by ... no other than the U.S. pirate attack on Puerto Soledad. Why? Because they did not want laws and rules, they wanted to scavenge the land. The U.S. and U.K. are famous for tag team robbing territories, like they did with Diego Garcia, the Virgin Islands and other Caribbean "situations". It looks to me you have been exclusively educated by the British propagandist narrative taught to the British people and the Islanders; because you seem to know nothing other that what concerns Britain's convenient version of events, though self servingly false it may be. Like what is currently taught about WW2, "my little savoir of the world, liberator of the Jews hero" LOL lol In fact, the English language is today definitely the greatest producer of lies in human history out of all the world's literary history, and people in both America and the England are both starting to admit that. Luckily. Unfortunately uncovering the unforgivable truth of the millions both our countries have murdered in order to control AND USE the world. You don't actually believe Galtieri was stupid enough to go straight into a losing war do you? You do, don't you? Just like you believe Britain came reaaaaaallyyy close to not winning that war. LOL Perhaps ... caring more about your own education would be my advice to you.
@GH-oi2jf4 жыл бұрын
Patrick Edgar Regini - I don’t think the French or the Dutch are involved in the current controversy.
@theredraven4 жыл бұрын
Shut up you screeching mong.
@loyalist57364 жыл бұрын
Patrick I hope you don't live in Argentina.
@Patrick.Edgar.Regini4 жыл бұрын
@@loyalist5736 Why? I actually have lived there on several occasions. Once for seven years.
@loyalist57364 жыл бұрын
@@Patrick.Edgar.Regini Argentina the only country to complain about colonialism when there country is built on it ....a laughing stock.