You'll Never Watch Wonka In The Same Way After Seeing This!

[@thachvo8331]

So crazy how much effort film makers are willing to make for a movie. hats off

[@kingcosworth2643]

They get compensated handsomely, this is why the budgets are so big

[@justincarawan-carawanco.pu1639]

Makes you wonder how the original classic was made.

[@Ultrue87]

@@kingcosworth2643 but still man if you don't have passion the detail of work like this no way can happen

[@savvasl2986]

u mean were xD

[@angelicavargas2314]

those squirrels were A list actors

[@historymaven]

That’s why they call it movie magic. The amount of collaboration and funding it must have taken to piece this together is miraculous.

[@chrisparkes2179]

I hope you did a sweeping, arching gesture of your other hand when you typed "Movie Magic"!

[@historymaven]

@@chrisparkes2179 you know it! 😂

[@OzoneGamerStation]

@Betty white speak for yourself. Both movies are great in their own ways. I much prefer the modern take on it.

[@danquaylesitsspeltpotatoe8307]

Why train one squirrel when you can train 40?

[@konaqua122]

But the result is very worth the price. Unlike the current d1sney/netfl1x lives. They are good but good at best.

[@JunaidWolf3]

For a movie that came out in 2005 this has got to be some amazing footage

[@JGProductions6581]

I thought he was talking about the 1971 veesion

[@PokemonChampionAquavenus]

Nope. This comment doesn't make me feel old at all. ......

[@chrisparkes2179]

@@PokemonChampionAquavenus I know. Oh, how I know! Take deep breaths, hold my hand and we'll move on to something less ego deflating.

[@Erysx12]

Bro I watched this movie this year and the quality is still top notch you’d think it’s a recent movie

[@kimhisham6033]

Bro human can do wonders. There are pyramids, stonehedges, machu picchu, the great walls for reasons

[@eddherring3088]

Shout out for (Gurdeep) Deep Roy, this often underappreciated actor not only played 160 Oompa Loompas in this film but also worked on British sci-fi shows Doctor Who and Blake's 7, he was also in Flash Gordon, Star Trek and Star Wars so his sci-fi credentials are pretty much perfect. Thank you Deep Roy.👏👏👏👏🎬

[@Vidchemy]

I didn't know anything about Deep Roy until another "how it was made" video that focused on his part in the movie. Later, I was surprised to see his name in an old movie, maybe a Doctor Who episode.

[@maisiesummers42]

He had a major role in Neverending Story. He's been in the biz for a long time.

[@kaylahall1219]

He was in how I met your mother also I think

[@pinkfeet518]

he’s SO talented

[@that_pan_chick8650]

He plays a Mexican thug on East Bound and Down Which I HIGHLY recommend. It’s on hbo and it’s funny as hell.

[@IsaacWale2004]

"The film is nearly 20 years old" Damn... I feel old...

[@JGProductions6581]

And the Poptropica island is 10 years old. And the original movie is 51. And the book is over 2 centuries old.

[@scrubscrubscrubs]

@@JGProductions6581what book? What’s poptropica island?

[@lancer525]

@@scrubscrubscrubs What book? Seriously? Were you not aware that the great Gene Wilder did the original movie _Willie Wonka and the Chocolate Factory_ in 1971? Or that it was based on a book, written by Roald Dahl in 1964? (Jeffy is a little off on his date here, but it's okay) Roald Dahl also wrote _James and the Giant Peach, Matilda, The Witches, Fantastic Mr Fox_ and _Danny, the Champion of the World_ If you didn't know these things, it could be forgiven, either because you're too young, or not exposed to enough literature. Either way, both of those conditions can be fixed. You're welcome! 😄

[@scrubscrubscrubs]

@@lancer525 I was a huge Roald Dahl fan as a child but the comment said “the book is over 2 centuries old”.. he couldn’t possibly be talking about anything written by Roald Dahl hence me asking what book.. not sure if you’re stupid or lack reading comprehension skills or just trolling me but a century is a hundred years. So you’re telling me Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is over 200 years old???

[@scrubscrubscrubs]

@@lancer525 Gene Wilder is brilliant but my question has nothing to do with him..

[@mspears_bobobuddytheseniorcat]

The fact most of the squirrels are real and we’re trained to do that blew my mind! 🐿

[@madisonwilliamson]

Forreal!

[@Mrshoujo]

*were

[@snavisTM]

@@Mrshoujo it was likely auto corrected that way, this isn't English class and try as you might to convince strangers on the internet that you're intelligent in the end nobody knows who you are or cares about your level of grammar.

[@ub-06austin40]

I guess you could say it was nuts

[@organixgirl]

I raise squirrels so it’s not hard to believe they’re very smart, many people call them tree rats but they love pets and cuddles and nuts ❤

[@kobee463]

this is why i love movies in year 2002-2009 because most of the props on the set are true and Less CGI.

[@MsLadyGaga16]

Yes I 💯 agree! They felt more authentic

[@fastertrackcreative]

CGI can be effective but it can look cartoonish especially over time.

[@DHM91]

Oh you youngins. 😂

[@Strimbles]

Those CGI Oomps Loompas destroyed this movie imo oh yeah, and Johnny Depp

[@jdos5643]

You can tell when things are cgi. They are not real.

[@mermaidopulence8539]

Can you imagine having a realistic animatronic version of you in different forms. That would freak me out so much.

[@insertjokehere]

Sounds like a thing they'd do in the musical

[@lukecalos4442]

I've always enjoyed trying to understand the CGI and RL mechanisms that were used in good movies, and I love to see the creativity and the amazing talents that were used on this masterpiece 😍

[@snavisTM]

😆 you think the Wonka remake was a masterpiece? Good god you have absolutely no taste.

[@lukecalos4442]

@@snavisTM Can you tell me an example of masterpiece? Because you know, obviously tastes are the same for every person?😂🙄 There are different tastes, and lots of them are based on a movie (in this case) remembering you about something. It could be a childhood memory, your parent watching it, or literally anything. For me, this is a great film cuz they were able to take different problems about a person's life and fuse them for make a lesson of humility and empathy. You can say I have 0 teste (without even explaining btw🙄), but you have 0 respect for the work they put in the film and the acting skills involved

[@mariosalgado3131]

"This movie is almost 20 years old!" Damn And I still refer to it as "The new Willy Wonka "

[@pdxdonut]

You're not going to be able to say that for much longer now that the Wonka origin story is coming to theaters soon.

[@mandymac98]

haha, so true!!

[@RainbowCoda]

Ahahaha same

[@dr.downvote]

Robert Downey Jr becoming a father in his life doesn’t make him Robert Downey Sr now does it?

[@Labyrinth6000]

@@dr.downvote Not really, if he has a son thats the same name as him, than he'd be a II. Since its his father that's Sr, he's still Jr.

[@williamjones7163]

This makes want to see Charlie and the Chocolate Factory again even more!

[@jovannamadorra6309]

For some reason, I read this as Frodo and the Chocolate Factory. Hmm.

[@VaultWeasel]

O uO Deep Roy was also in Neverending Story as Teeny Weeny, and a Egyptian Guard in Transformers Revenge of The Fallen. This actor gave maximum effort in every role including cameos.

[@SuperFlashDriver]

@@jovannamadorra6309 XDDD Whoops, Imagine if lord of the rings had their own story of the factory tour.

[@mamacookie4948]

The original one I hope?!?!

[@SuperFlashDriver]

@@mamacookie4948 I think he/she means the 2005 movie adaptation of the film, not the 1971 film sadly.

[@ancient7716]

I am baffled to hear such incredible effort was put in this just for that one scene. The determination is incredible.

[@FrostbiteMadHatter2112]

This is the true difference between Indie and Studio films, the sheer amount of resources and effort I mean taking weeks training squirrells for maybe a 1 minute scene max for the final cut, that's just incredible Kudos to the film makers that go all out

[@simplesushi9102]

the true difference between indie and studio films is budget lmao

[@BeaufortRyan]

This must of been the hardest movie ever made. The Oompa Loompas look so realistic.

[@therealautisticdj2]

The think the hardest movie ever made was Cleopatra (1963) because that took I think over 2 or 4 years to film. And there was a quite a few hiccups with some people being sick and filming was awkward...

[@Gr3nadgr3gory]

I doubt it cracks the top ten.

[@snavisTM]

Imagine working that hard on a garbage film like this one. The fact that people think it's a "masterpiece" proves that a lot of people can collectively have incredibly bad taste.

[@grimreaper5264]

@@snavisTMits not a bad film. Its a masterpiece because it is actually based on the book, unlike the old movie. The old movie is actually garbage.

[@andrewzasidko6595]

​​@@snavisTM You know, I hear such a take on the 2005 movie only from americans. Maybe the old movie was somehow really impactful culturally or whatever. But here in the EU and where I'm from (Ukraine) we don't even know much about the 70s movie. It's like the Wizard of Oz, a groundbreaking part of American culture and history but not so much in the outside world. The 2005 Charlie and the Chocolate factory is the first one I saw. And honestly, the movie is great in my opinion. The script is not lame, the filming and effects are top notch and none of the actors were less than incredible. It has a distinct sense of quality. It feels like a big movie although the scale of the story is pretty small.

[@Cardbordboxonfire]

Still one of my favorite movies. I wish more movies put this kind of effort into them. The hard work holds up over time

[@viriserralde]

That’s why we have topgun now

[@juicy_oranges5529]

Avatar wants to have a talk

[@SuperFlashDriver]

There are some filmmakers and movie studios who do take risks like these, but nowadays are so far and few that CGI is jut cheaper than doing exactly what this movie did in 2005. This was also before inflation became an issue in the late 2000s and 2020 onward.

[@jasonblalock4429]

And all I can think about is how absolutely surreal this would have been for the squirrels themselves. Especially the animatronics.

[@jacobbradshaw995]

If you're reading this, Watch out for scams! Your comment has a reply impersonating a youtuber with a gift, but it's a scam.

[@draughtroom368DR34]

@@jacobbradshaw995 yeah, it's really easy to spot if it has something about the telegram

[@Nikkii18]

It’s really such an amazing movie I remember the first time I saw it as a kid and absolutely loved it and wished all of it was real, so now seeing how much effort and time was really put in almost doesn’t seem worth it but look at the result..20 years later still talked about still in awe and still questioning what’s real and what’s not

[@SuperFlashDriver]

Many of the fims in the mid 2000s and before used only as much CGI as they could, while other times used other techniques to simulate creatures in live action. Jurassic Park, Tron (1982), Attack of the Tomatoes, The Blob (1970s), Child's Play (1988), SAW (2004), The Howling (1981), etc. It's just that CGI was just starting to become the new medium by the time I was born in 1995. What a time to be alive as a 1990s kid watching tech go so far advanced, even the baby boomers of the 1950s could not have imagine of what kind of tech would occur in the far future. Before you know it, someday, we'll be able to walk around and explore at our own leisure inside the movies, either projected, holographic, or transported into some digital space of the movie you inserted (offline or in movie theaters), where you can walk around and see it all happen from your own point of view instead of the camera itself. It's just that the actors or crew won't feel, notice, see, or hear you simply because the footage filmed in the movie was done in the past. But it would be really cool if that type of tech I mentioned does occur in the future (I just hope it doesn't make you pay a monthly fee to use it and require internet connection to do so).

[@poniesatemypencils]

As someone who does clicker training with animals I will always be amazed at seeing animals being taught to do these things for movies. Actually my dream is to do this for film, particularly with horses. I love clicker training, you can get animals to learn almost anything with it and it's completely humane as it's force free and using food rewards!

[@SuperFlashDriver]

Horses are just as difficult as squirrels, cats, dogs, etc. Plus, another film prior to "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" in 2004 titled "Racing Stripes" had a bunch of horses and a zebra they had to train, and those horses were real. The only ones that were CGI were the flies and that's it. Some of the scenes in racing stripes you can tell were done on a blue screen, but most of it took place in some Kentucky derby....I'd be surprised if there's a behind the scenes video for "Racing Stripes" out there, and much like the Charlie one, I have seen "Racing Stripes" in theaters 20 years ago, and it's a pretty good film in my book, but it definitely was one of the first to introduce me to the Kentucky Derby sport that has existed since the 1870s/1880s.

[@traviswright456]

This movie is a masterpiece. It’s a little creepy, but the special affects and cgi are amazing.

[@lrizzard]

i think the creepyness goes really well with the roald dahl story; i always felt his books had an underlying creepiness

[@bj.bruner]

@@lrizzard Add the fact that none other than Tim Burton directed the film and you've got quite the wacky story

[@fumomofumosarum5893]

I love movies that manage to be " a little creepy " - it's like with a hot spice, of course you shouldn't overdo it when cooking - but this movie has just the perfect ammount of creepy, just a hint of it here and there.

[@jdos5643]

Didn’t they also use the hoompa loompa guy in the x files badlaa?

[@peterlenham3180]

​@@jdos5643Yes that's him.

[@aquariuslove8662]

This movie was amazing. And all the effort and talent that went into it AWESOME

[@tabora_]

I've always loved Deep Roy,, he's such a charismatic person and he has great roles that give life-long memories. His role in this movie was top tier

[@ForeverSweetx3]

I hope deep roy was paid well

[@tabora_]

@ForeverSweetx3 $1,000,000 Google says. Pretty good for his role, but personally, I think it should've been raised slightly for all of the work he did

[@orange_turtle3412]

The fact that every oompa loompa is a separate, completely unique take of deep roy and that they all sync up so perfectly is insane.

[@misiopuchatek152]

This movie is a gem. So much effort and you can see that on the screen.

[@Strimbles]

Johhny Depp was a HORRIBLE Willy Wonka and the Oompa Loompas were so bad, cringe

[@vsolyomi]

"40 squierrels went through intense three-month training camp..." - you just made my day, sir!

[@LearnNew-fd6lr]

Man!!! Seriously this is one of my favorite child hood movies, I have also read the the book by Roald Dahl..Never new so much work is put into making this movie.good work keep it up:)

[@GrandyandGrando]

Those "oompa loompas" in the 2005 movie still don't replace the classic tangerine and broccoli guys ❤

[@loomonda18]

CGI little people, but real squirrel training....lol - priorities...

[@zerotodona1495]

The actor still had a lot for him to do even if they used some cgi. Especially if he was to copy the dance 60+ times for effects.

[@TheGreekPianist]

WOW, can’t believe this film is almost 20 years old! Time truly flies…

[@SuperFlashDriver]

You think that's bad, the wonka 1971 film turned 50 years old on June 30th, 2021....let that sink in.....Someday this film will turn 50 years old in 2055, 2055 being 100 years later after 1955, the year Back To The Future's first film takes place in mostly.

[@cardiffst]

I wish these videos were an hour long 😍

[@robertholtz]

I always enjoy your channel. Thank you so much for the great work. Cheers!

[@FameFocus]

Thanks a lot!!!

[@chasehedges6775]

The Johnny Depp/Tim Burton version is a decent style over substance movie but the Gene Wilder one is still an absolute classic film.

[@_what._.]

What ?? The Gene Wilder one is kinda bad, the Burton one is a masterpiece

[@lukecalos4442]

I think the Gene Wilder one had amazing acting and good backgrounds, that are still pretty good, but I think Burton's version is just better overall for the speed, the soundtrack and Wonka's character (I just like the mad genie of the newest version, but that is more of a personal feeling 😅)

[@prometheus23c]

I respect your opinion, but it’s just that, an opinion. I prefer the Tim Burton version. As with most things to do with art, most judgements will be based on each individual’s personal views.

[@HesmiyuMC]

I don't know how true this is, but apparently Depp's one was more in keeping with the book.

[@Ezra.The.American.Patriot]

I agree temporarily...my opinion changes all the time😂

[@JustWasted3HoursHere]

Although I prefer the older Gene Wilder Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, I do appreciate all the hard work and ingenuity that went into this version.

[@SuperFlashDriver]

I'm the same believe it or not. My family and I grew up with the wonka 1971 film, but I have seen the 2005 one in theaters when I was only 9 years old. And while I do feel embarrassed or humiliated when an oompa loompa came on, I do have a soft spot for this film if you ask me. But my mom sure didn't like because of the way the oompa loompas looked and the music itself.

[@blaze6]

Imagine having that many electronic versions of yourself

[@madisonwilliamson]

Scary!😬😂

[@officiallystacksnetwork]

I love movies that actually apply the hard work and effects 🥺 i love this movie because of its detailed story and structure ❤️💕

[@BonesAlexander]

This gives me a bigger appreciation for this movie.

[@ariannashrum9068]

It always amazes me how much work goes into movies

[@lizbethcandelero474]

They put so much work in this movie that just makes me proud especially because of the year it was made, it’s my favorite movie

[@Javier23gol]

Almost choke when you said “the film is nearly 20 years old”. Man I thought this movie came out like 8 years ago 😂

[@npigwnl]

Legend has it that, after the film shoot was done, all squirrels got actual jobs at candy factories

[@killerkat]

It's crazy to think how much work and $$ goes into making a film ... thanks for the amazing information!

[@ryans413]

This just make me respect this more. Everything in this movie could have easily been cgi but they trained real squirrels I’m amazed

[@hawaii3231]

So much effort. I don’t know how people have so much energy in life.

[@audreemaurice4899]

Man that was impressive and entertaining at the same time to learn how the movie special effect is made . I always loved seeing those thing

[@Firewizard23]

Truth, I always noticed how robotic the drilling Oompa Loompa looked in the chocolate room scene when they first spot the Oompa Loompas.

[@kolonarulez5222]

Way back when dvds had behind the scenes snippets this movie made me fall in love with special effects and filmmaking. Charlie and Night at the Museum

[@SuperFlashDriver]

Back in the late 90s and mid 2000s when companies would have the bonus/special features on either one disc or two discs, and would stuff that content with documentaries, behind the scenes, and my personal favorite "Outtakes/Deleted Scenes" that never made it into the film....Nowadays, all you get is the movie, maybe some things here and there, but because of KZbin and how you can access behind the scenes content much quicker on youtube, there really was no need to get Blu-Ray or DVDs just for behind the scenes or documentary/actor interview content anymore, since you can find one online or say youtube to get your moviemaking fix. And while some Blu-Rays, including The Criterion Collection, still do physical releases with behind the scenes content to this very day, many movie companies are turning away from it and straight up going full on digital downloads/streaming and no longer releasing physical copies anymore. But yeah, the 2000s would be the last decade to ever release any analog content and tech before the switch to full on digital 24/7.

[@cameronmoore136]

I can't even begin ghe express how remarkable the amount of effort put into movies is.

[@999chels]

this is amazing. i have a whole new appreciation for this movie

[@abc-ey4ld]

Well NASA said, either we spend 3 months training squirrels to recreate the willi wonka scene or we send a rescue shuttle to space. You see where they went here.

[@sarahleeann7208]

If somebody made a bunch of lifelike puppets that looked exactly like me I think I'd have an existential crisis

[@sandralobach69]

They did so much more with this than I thought. I'm actually relieved and impressed! I assumed they must have just animated most of it. I'm glad to see they didn't. This is amazing work!!! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

[@kermitttt]

One of those not many movies, wher CGI looks good

[@AlephSix66]

0:35 NO NO, I remember this movie, I remember it ALL too well. And it was this ONE scene i will never forget.

[@Lowkey-yb4nm]

To this day one of my favorite movies of all time. Depp killed this role

[@LoopBuddy]

It's facanating how much work goes into these movies! Amazing!

[@eliben4066]

This movie needs more love, man. It’s a second adaptation in my eyes, not a remake of the Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, so it shouldn’t get that default remake hate. It’s not even that cheesy. It’s classic Tim Burton and Danny Elfman magic mixed with Roald Dahl horror

[@keeleyroberts629]

All this hard work paid off

[@tippyinkle]

I knew Willy Wonka was hiding something from everyone

[@Griwhoolda]

I love that I got a KZbin KitKat commercial before this started playing., ha ha.

[@dlbm_industries]

Dude, it's money!!! Thx for your job. 🤝🏻

[@HMBRTOABLE]

Wow. If that’s how much effort was put into this movie, I can’t imagine how much time they spent making the first movie.

[@MusicRelatedCandy]

Surely it would have been easier to cast multiple Oompa Loompas instead of having to composite

[@sammitchell3657]

Like the original? Yea. Exactly.

[@zerotodona1495]

Burton was copying the book, the real book, not censored. Finding a dwarf of the same size and color is not likely to happen.

[@SuperFlashDriver]

@@zerotodona1495 It is possible, but the issue would be language barrier. It's weird considering the oompa loompa from the 1971 film was still living when the 2005 film was in production, just that he looks older than what he was back in the 1970s.

[@n_hr18]

I love this movie and I’ve watched it 1000 times ❤

[@Ghostly1989]

I still remember going to the movies to see this back when I was a teenager. It’s amazing how fast time goes by.

[@peerlangenheimmusic]

When watching it as a little kid I never really thought about special effects. But seeing this video now completely blows my mind.

[@SuperFlashDriver]

My family bought a bunch of DVD movies that had behind the scenes material in the special features/bonus features section of the DVD, and I used to watch ones on The Santa Claus 2 and The Cat In The Hat 2003 movies, and let me tell you, it's weird to see it on a set and not in the final movie....But as John Forsythe once said in a 1990s VHS straight to home video purchased from the theme park "That is the magic of moviemaking."

[@clarytan]

I wonder what the budget was for squirrel training! 😂😂

[@WayneSmith-g8h]

deep roy is a legend

[@Juncti]

Don't think you've done one on this movie, at least couldn't find it in a channel search. The dance scene in the movie Last Night in Soho would be cool to look at. Having watched a lot of videos like this explaining how they film things, this dance scene was mind blowing. It looked like what you'd get if you used effects, but they did a lot of it live using camera movements and perfectly timed movements. It's amazing what they pulled off in this movie. Don't think they used a ton of cgi and green screen, but what they did do blended right into all the practical effects they came up with.

[@FierceGinger]

I feel like a puppet after seeing this! I only knew about the last one with Deep Roy, but not to that extent. It’s amazing what they went through with this movie. I definitely won’t see it the same way again, so cool, especially for being almost 20 years old! I remember when it came out, I was amazed.

[@prenimystic]

This movie continues to amaze me to this day

[@elderjoe1]

Dont know what is more mind blowing, all the CGI and tricks they used to make such convincing shots or that Wonka is played by Jonny Depp!

[@charisamartin2152]

Deep Roy probably was freaked out seeing all those robots of himself 😂

[@foolsanticsstudio]

That is awesome. Someone give the behind the scenes people a raise.

[@dr.emilschaffhausen4683]

Still not a fan of the movie but I respect the amount of work that went into it.

[@Couldntcomeupwahandle]

Same but yeah the work is insane

[@waffle8364]

can you imagine having yourself replicated as a puppet like that? those puppets are still out there. they don't just throw them away.

[@Hannahlytics]

It is incredible how Willy wonka was made well ahead of its time. I can’t believe it was made 20 years ago. I remember watching it as a kid thinking that every playground should be like this.

[@Loonicity]

y'know, learning that the main room with the chocolate waterfall was real, makes me wish I could have visited the set IRL just to see such a sight.

[@Kafj302]

did Deep Roy get Paid for each role? imagine if the credits include just a list of him and which Oompa Loompa he was.

[@madisonwilliamson]

Lol! He definitely deserves it!

[@Kilvieo]

I have a new found respect for this movie

[@Skooby]

Imagine being Deep Roy and seeing all of those animatronics for the first time 😂

[@allclassgamingtv7295]

i love the movie.....bad that no part 2 is there

[@Acle75]

Tech Experts: so... what you use for filming this movie? CGI? Photoshop? Blender? This guy: actual set of reality and animatronic 🥶👌

[@fluxoteen]

Has anyone really re-watched this since it launched?

[@1977TA]

I have rewatched this mostly because I'm A Johnny Depp fan. When compared to the classic original Willy Wonka film starring the great Gene Wilder this film doesn't even come close to capturing the wonder and awe-inspiring charm of the original.

[@francescalocaso5130]

They put so much work in this movie that just makes me proud especially because of the year it was made , it's my favorite movie ❤

[@Hisk..E]

WAIT NO WAY HANG ON I SAW ONE THOSE AND IT WAS ACTUALLY NOT HUMAN MOTION IT WAS ROBOTI KNEW IT I KNEW ITTTTTT LES GOOOOO

[@cloudykingdom]

You sound like Grian ❤

[@tremorsfan]

Props to Deep Roy.

[@hurricane31415]

I've often wondered about these shots.

[@yesdadbut960]

When making movies was art not just some money grabbing technique

[@Quick-Silver206]

This is my favorite style of movie making: a perfect blend of all techniques.

[@MattCatt0614]

This is not the original Willy Wonka it's the Johnny Depp version

[@GameAce6]

"You want real actors, animatronics, or CGI?" Burton: "Yes"

[@Watermelon-c9x]

I bet this comment won’t get more then 2000 likes

[@Mr.Rabot6688]

Touch grass

[@4eyesinthecorner399]

Fun fact, one of the main ingredients used to make the chocolate lake fluid was basically toothpaste (one of the main ingredients used to make toothpaste) to help it have that realistic consistency

[@DHM91]

All this effort for a subpar adaptation of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. I find this endlessly fascinating!

[@mrmidnight32]

“Seamlessly” uhhhh this was one of the most obvious CGI movies I’ve seen since Avatar 😂

[@walpaiva7305]

Gread job production!

[@Jiggysaw]

"It's almost impossible to tell what is real, what is digital, and what is just a puppet"

[@aaaaaaaa194]

and this film was like nearly 20 years ago!! hats off to the team.

[@surrealstr]

This is actually one of the really good movies I've watched and the hard work behind it is really appreciated

[@erinbathie-moore8478]

All that effort is truly commendable!! Well done to the special effects and robotics teams for making this work. I truly couldn't tell what was what while watching this film :D