Far Cry 3 - E3 vs Retail | Direct Comparison

[@pash1898]

Vaas on E3 looked like a doll

[@blackyoshi4763]

That's Chucky, my nigga

[@mistakechild1018]

Pashaportino the e3 one looks like improved border lands graphics

[@user-be3yr5ei7k]

but the forest look like japan suicide forest

[@rjemlaxy2723]

It Looks like if It’s Made For The Wii

[@sonodietrodithemihannofreg2432]

Pashaportino with butter on him

[@fakhriarmaida4914]

Better environment in e3 Better character in retail

[@Anyrhing77]

nope

[@NigelHeads]

E3 environment looked like farcry 1 with all that blue

[@AngelFrench]

Jarred you’re an idiot that doesn’t play video games

[@alienduce-unocero]

What? No, no...

[@eddieh.2338]

@Shriyansh Pandey agree :)) E3 demo look too green, bit dark and weir ( the temple ) and how vass look. while retail has a better lighting, contrast and :))) higher difficulty

[@fregatta9243]

When i can see... Ubisoft upgrade..

[@markzaikov456]

I hate it when other's switch the E3 and the Retail and titled it as "Ubisoft Downgrade".

[@FzPura]

Mark Zaikov its both upgrade and downgrade.. notice the detail or the foliage of the forest in E3 are better..

[@FzPura]

Sorry for my bad english

[@markzaikov456]

Not that much of a downgrade, i think they aimed a little too far realistic. Look at a real waterfall. But my point is they're switching both the E3 and Retail and i think that's disgusting.

[@edimarrodrigrove3377]

Get glasses, looks the vegetation, water and enviroment in general on E3 version looks so better than retail version.

[@nickwoodruff3321]

Fc3 still looks outstanding to this day, imo.

[@TruMoist]

Nick Woodruff yeah, it was so good for its time

[@CatnamedMittens]

Except random npc faces. They look fucking bogus.

[@TheDUDE101GOOD]

Looks better than FC5 in some areas but FC5 has beautiful volumetric lighting

[@christophertalmage3392]

Farcry 4,3 and gameplay and campaign are the best. Farcry 5 graphics are very beautiful. Imo

[@harrym1862]

@@CatnamedMittens bogus beetus your mom's now a fetus

[@realxeltos]

Final is better with character textures and item textures. But nature details are better in demo. Especially the water.

[@jacobpage5194]

I wonder why they would bother making those changes if they were complete in an earlier build, sort of seems like nonsense

[@thn4296]

@@jacobpage5194 for optimization

[@firuzmajid4780]

@@thn4296 altought the PC version (and the Classic edition for 8th gen consoles if i remember right) had all those things EDIT: I got the Classic edition, and it looks the same. I'm not sure about the PC version tho

[@balkangameszp]

E3 version was never meant to be shipped it was made just for especially made for e3

[@N-GinAndTonicTM]

Even now, 6 years later Far Cry 3's graphics are still phenomenal. And the Classic Edition? *Whew*

[@firuzmajid4780]

And Blood Dragon? Bombastic!

[@codename.ken-z]

@@firuzmajid4780 Just played it today lol, its awesome

[@kingkong1040]

Reinstalled Far cry 3 this week to replay it since beating it when it was released....still looks excellent. FC4/5 improved but still, FC3 was the foundation for it all.

[@cheebadigga4092]

Classic Edition? So the original PC version maxed out? lol console gamers are funny

[@dash9254]

nah, Far Cry 3's graphics are kind of bad even for the time it was released.

[@XxnextrekXx2000]

Let's be real, the E3 looks much more ambitious than what Ubisoft released. The engine they showed at E3 is more washed out but also more realistic looking. I loved Far Cry 3 but the graphics were kind of cartoony. The weapons look better too, as well as the water. And it's minor a minor detail but you can also see the veins on Jason's arm. I think what they were going for in the beginning of development was probably a lot different than the whole tribal aspect they went with on retail.

[@kinnick5643]

Well said

[@mr.d9429]

Am I the only one who prefers the E3 specs than the retail version? It does not look better or graphically superior, but it has more life into it. More passion and more work done than what we ended up with.

[@isaacclarke8976]

The wrist watch. Noticed that? That must be waterproof

[@shdnsjsns6231]

3:22 That beta/unused takedown animation looks awesome and better than in final version.

[@strider029]

My theory, E3 Demo is just a linear map compared to the final build which is open world. It has been the case ever since. They can put more detail in linear map because the game can handle those resources, the final build already have alot of resources/ assets in it which will cause hell for the hardware especially for X360. The demo is also a concept, which is an inspiration for the open world thing, they have to replicate it.

[@carlosmagnomacieira8210]

Argon why specially for the x360? both ps3 and 360 suffers with this game...

[@KafanskaTV]

Demo usually doesn't run on your normal PC/console. If it's on PC it will be a beast, if it's on console it will be the developer kit which has better hardware than the ordinary console for retail. That allows for developers to leaver more detail in the game and it will run nice for demonstration purposes. But when you try it on ordinary hardware and have to start optimizing that's when you start putting hills to break line of sight and similar tricks (because any good game engine doesn't render stuff that you can't see) which are there to make the game run better.

[@microwavetacos8142]

Yeah, but what’s the point of making particular scenes in an open world and stress out hardware, when you can do some scenes on a linear map with enhanced graphics for better cutscenes You still have to wait for a loading screen and you can’t leave this areas on most of these missions so... why

[@AchiragChiragg]

I think the term you're looking for is "Vertical Slice"

[@AchiragChiragg]

@@solidparas1925 *doubt*

[@DerekBerryMusic]

The fog and volumetric effects as well as the foliage looked amazing in e3

[@slimsladey489]

The retail is better in my opinion. I just can’t stand those soft, undetailed faces in the demo

[@diidac17]

Slade Johnson Nope, they cutted the most important thing of an INSLAND, the JUNGLE!!!!!

[@_wayward_494]

Diego Martínez an insland? Whats that?

[@Donutyeehaw]

Diego Martínez we have a massive jungle in the game child. You probably have never even played it

[@diidac17]

Bo Horton Hahaha, i have played it so many times buddy. I have all the far cry games, and i have played it, u idiot. How many far cry games have u played? And now. Massive jungle? Are u kidding me? Probably you have never been in a real jungle enviroment. I had. And I garantee you that the game looks like a european forest on an island. Go and play Far Cry 2 my mate, it is an 2008 game, and it has a better details and JUNGLE, than this game

[@michaelJones_1800]

Slade Johnson what does retail mean?

[@Macsk8ing]

This game is literally the best $60 I've ever spent.

[@dardar3596]

This game was not even 60$ tho how?

[@1Insurgency1]

@@dardar3596 he's talking about when it was first released man

[@uncleshark8358]

Inevitable they still ripped him off though

[@1Insurgency1]

@@uncleshark8358 the change in graphical fidelity was made up for in other ways

[@uncleshark8358]

Inevitable ooooohhh ok I understand

[@inoob5906]

One thing i just cant get over with is the water. In the e3, the water looked more swampish, with bubbles emerging looking like actual water. In the retail however...

[@justyi2692]

I played this game a lot... I remember when I started playing on my old ps 3. I finished all the game with all the trophies all weapons max, max money , max ammo, max skill tree. Aghh good old days

[@Skrenja]

Yep, I remember getting it for Christmas on ps3 back in the day. Binged through the whole thing. It is probably the best open world, single-player fps I’ve ever played. I bought it recently for PC but it is a terrible port. Such a shame.

[@Concise_Parakeet]

Nice

[@unchartedgaming4733]

6:31 lag, that’s why. You can even see the FPS drop in the E3 when they looked at the waterfall. Same with the destructive bridge.

[@swiftxxy3615]

Yes i see them

[@ajayghale8242]

In e3 Jason had a wrist watch ⌚on his left hand. It was cut In final

[@jeetrajchoudhury8432]

I agree mostly. You did not talk about e3 having more detailed underwater effects. Great video though

[@arsonisthotdog5914]

Jeetraj Choudhury Ubisoft always does this with their E3 demos, just look at the destruction and lighting in the Rainbow Six Siege E3 demo compared to final release. Ubisoft always go overboard with the graphics in their presentations, because they have the hardware to do so. The graphics always end up getting dumbed down due to hardware limitations.

[@dino.antares]

ArsonistHotdog it's actually because of your system not Ubisoft's. Ubi thinks that everyone has a superb state of the art PC so they make the game according to that. If you ever visit any Ubi studio and play a game... you will find the graphics are better than the one in your system. Ubi uses 4 CPUs in one rig

[@arsonisthotdog5914]

Shiladitya Talukder That’s basically what I just said, I apologise if I worded it poorly. What I was saying is that Ubi pushes the graphics to the absolute limit for presentations, then reduce the graphical fidelity for the consumer version of the game “due to hardware limitations”.

[@jasinrefiku2914]

Who the fuck needs underwater effects lol

[@dino.antares]

ArsonistHotdog your way of telling was perfect. It's just some people need to be told twice by different people so that they can believe.

[@TheGman901]

Bro the zoom in on the AK and the shaking of the gun is absolutely amazing in the e3 version...and so dull in retail!

[@palebreath]

Things always seem so atmospheric and cinematic in E3 demos, it's kind of disappointing when the final release comes

[@redhood8917]

So they took away Jason's watch in the final version

[@thecommentsuperhero8578]

Aren't you Jason?

[@brandon_Larsen]

And they gave it to Ajay Gale.

[@sankarankutty6828]

@@brandon_Larsen mind blown

[@kooldawg]

@@thecommentsuperhero8578 oh I get it because red hood is Jason todd

[@cheneteespares180]

@@kooldawg mind blown

[@Jean_Mike]

THE TAKEDOWNS OF THE E3 VERSION ARE AWESOME :0

[@zombiewarrior225]

They made a huge upgrade. Even now, Far Cry 3 is my favorite Far Cry. It's simply amazing.

[@peanusbenis5631]

You’re kind of right. Ubisoft did far exceed on what they originally promised because they never promised to downgrade the game at all.

[@Fizzlepop72]

They didn't downgrade it. They changed some minimal things. Also, it's open world and the E3 build is linear.

[@damxcv]

@@Fizzlepop72 they did downgrade the game

[@abhi.dx2345]

@@damxcv they downgraded the environment a little bit, but character models were upgraded though

[@PriceLomonte]

Bro they downgraded and took out alot of stuff

[@stevemc6010]

The older pirates design was so much better. That one mod that gives them not uniform clothes is nice.

[@dlakodlak]

I think the dense vegetation background is there to simply obscure any unfinished vistas

[@TheScure]

In E3 there are much more light sources and even at far distances. Vegetation looks more complex and less repetitive. There are more models, props, objects in the E3. Despite having some upgrades for the final version, you can see the usual faked things in the E3 demo. No way to have this complex scenes for a final game, like the place when he is coming out of waterfall. It just feels more real while in the final version you have the usual video game look, less and more simple lights, simple shadows, strong LOD and culling for performance.

[@daamazinfatb0y752]

The extra effects like waterfall mist and the dirt flying away when the helicopter took off should've been in the retail PC version.

[@LeafarR1657]

This E3 demo is probably based on the console version, because is very close to what I remember of playing on the PS3. At lease the character model is very similar to the E3 demo shown here.

[@Deeplycloseted435]

Recently played this game “Classic Edition” on PS4. Overall it looks good. The one thing I notice that we always get this gen, is that there is ZERO wind on this island. The vegetation never responds to wind at all. Only at the top of a tower do they play wind samples and the tower sways a bit to give the sense of it being windy. If you’ve ever been on an island in the South Pacific, it is very windy as there is nothing to stop it. Also, no wave anywhere on any of the beaches. Mild complaints, still looks great considering it’s age.

[@bLEACHeye]

I actually liked the Vaas more in E3, I think he looks a bit more creepy and insane, were in the retail there's a lot of shadow so his eyes and very hard to see were in the E3 they are very clear and always look at you with this creepy and insane look

[@iWillWakeYouUp]

You missed the fact that the foliage reacts to the wind in the E3 demo, and that you can see shadows on Vaas.

[@ninadpunekar]

Very well explained and i love fc3 I'm still playing it in 2018 it's been probably 100 times since i started

[@dino.antares]

I thought this would be another "omg ubi is so bad" "worst game makers in history" blah blah. But i can say I'm impressed.

[@leonjicha9921]

When I originally saw the trailer I expected the game to be way different, with a bit of focus on horror elements. The trailer was way more atmospheric. I love far cry 3 but I fee like it could've still been a lot better. The engine looked slightly cartoony as well, I feel like the look of the frostbite engine would've been amazing, also there really was no jungle in the final version, at no point in the game is the "forest" as dense as in the trailer. Unfortunately I will never get to play the game I'm picturing 🙁

[@thetremblingfan2572]

I can only agree to that. Especially the guns and the gunplay for some reason looked better in the E3 demo, in my opinion, than they do in final game. Overall the demo looked and felt a bit more like a FarCry 2 in the jungle. It felt and looked like that you had to be as resourceful as in FarCry 2 but way more polished.

[@hippokrates4494]

play crysis 1 and warhead, very good jungle

[@StinCrucing]

dunno if anyone mentioned this but - during the fall with a cinderblock tied your characters screams "fuck you!" as he falls in the final game, not in the e3

[@fairplayer916]

honestly i love FC3. still the best in the searies to me. With LOTS of amazing and memorable scenes. But the part showcased here always bothered me. it just draws attention to things that never made it to the final build. like the solders never moving around much like they did in the e3 demo. the lack of details like the bodies in the water.

[@firuzmajid4780]

I think they removed some of these things for a better optimization. What's the point of having Hyperrealistic graphics when everything (Including you) moves at 5 miserable FPS?

[@FHSBlackSwarm]

The amount of time between San Andreas and this game has been the same amount of time (if not a bit longer) from this game to now. I gotta say the graphic engine upgrades between 2002 and 2010 were AMAZING. With the launch of the Xbox 360 and the PS3 is when gaming seemed to have really took off

[@choppercam2806]

Environment: E3 Character Design: Actual Game

[@TheGman901]

Man the AK aim in the e3 build is just perfect

[@TheGman901]

I wish there was a mod for far cry3 to make it look 100% 1:1 identical to the e3 version!

[@nerijus7]

Knife takedown, and knife throw takedown in E3 demo is look so nice..

[@RyGuy-zu3mi]

Ah that’s what they’re adding in the remake silencers for everything, seriously can you imagine a silenced deagle that would be awesome

[@bliglum]

FC3 was one of the few that did not disappoint.

[@Desperado9064]

OK so, Vegetation was so dense, water and underwater effects were a lot better, dust effects, waterfall myst and particle effects were much better. What else hmm, textures of weapons and vegetation were better, character models were more catroony, lighting was better, shadows were more realistic, much more detailed locations. But I gotta say, the blur in E3 version was just too much.

[@ynk69]

That Huge rock that block views to helicopter was solely put there by level designers after gameplay testing.

[@schnitzel9003]

Honestly I like the look of the E3 demo better than retail

[@Beforezzz]

Though the high end PC reveals more detail on Vaas' face with textures and such, his expressions are superior and alot more natural in the E3 demo. I personally favor his look in 2011... Apart from "looking like a doll" there's actually sincere untamed insanity in his eyes and better hair, so on. I wouldn't call the retail much of an upgrade. The transition from when Jason falls in water to where he begins struggling to break the rope sums the comparison up nicely but it's skipped in this video.

[@pijinio]

2019 STILL PLAYING

[@mister_bush]

Somehow, I managed to sneak all the way to the helicopter and only got spotted before boarding it

[@xxaryamahardika6671]

0:42 when you open the front camera on your phone

[@LoydAvenheart]

E3 looks like you aren't wearing glasses and Retail looks like you just put on glasses.

[@IamTheOneWhoKnocks265]

Vaas really looked creepy in e3.

[@Kinato99]

That freaking level took years of my lifespan! It was very challenging

[@IIWolFFinEII]

In E3 version Jason had watch, in retail Jason has a tattoos I like more watch idea becoze hands look better with watch and player could propobaly see time. Or maby they cut it becoze they dont like to add time that is same as in game so they put tattoos.

[@djeddjole]

I feel like the surroundings, especially water, were a tad better in the E3 build, but it looked a lot worse overall than the final build. It looked a bit more like FC2 if that makes sense.

[@ROA277]

Of course they removed the waterfall fog effect because of the limited CPU power and you are saying you don't know why did they do it

[@asefnehal5360]

You missed the watch. In E3 build Jason was wearing a watch but it's missing in the final version.

[@grobgron9391]

That vegetation of E3

[@Desperado9064]

Crysis Style.

[@ommkarsahoo8113]

They should have added those guards throwing corpses

[@iownu92]

I dunno man, I feel like Vaas looked more expressive and crazy in the demo version, which I feel like fits better. The lighting and bloom is so harsh in the final version that it’s harder to see his face at times.

[@-pROvAK]

The knife throwing animation that you pointed out is not in the game at all. It is a completely different animation that was cut

[@Eldwinn]

It feels like they were using the far cry 2 engine with the E3 footage

[@D3spairFacTor90]

First time I’m seeing the graphics quality improve at retail instead of the other way around. Yeah I’m looking at you Ubisoft.

[@МаксимХижняков-л9х]

In E3 version of Far Cry 3 we see Jeep Wrangler from Far Cry 2

[@shdnsjsns6231]

3:22 Beta/Unused takedown animation.

[@matthewbrown7659]

I do wish they would allow for longer range engagements in the newer FarCry games (at least out to 500-600 yards) and bring back the gun play of the original FarCry. Not the crosshair-only part, give us iron sights still, but make the weapons operate more realistically... allow switching between semi and full auto and bring back weapon sway to make it harder to hit long range headshots.

[@Nick930]

Thank you! Totally agree. Why was this abandoned and nobody seems to notice? The long-range sniping was literally the original selling point of Far Cry lol

[@AndriySahil-xv9xg]

Retail looks sharpe and brighter other hand E3 look close to reality but failed to focus main characters

[@lisao10]

In e3 version Vaas has more facial expressions and the vegetation react to wind, i miss this.

[@Kim_E]

Farcry 3 > farcry 5

[@urdoolil5477]

K.Evrgrn the game gets boring after Vaas dies. Where as the game is boring start to finish in 5 and, 4 is shit because you can't play the actual full game on Pagan Min's side. The only good thing that separates 5 from the others is the American setting which really disappointed me just like assassins creed 3. Awesome setting horrible execution.

[@azarathomen6864]

You are blinded by nostalgia

[@Kim_E]

Pk panda nope it was just as fun back then as it is now

[@azarathomen6864]

It was great for its time but 5 beats it in every other aspect

[@Kim_E]

Pk panda i mean i still prefer fc3

[@LFXGaming]

Need to play this game and blood dragon again tbh

[@MainakRoyChowdhury]

Always wonder why GTA never showcase their game in E3? Curious to know.

[@caucasianinvasion2972]

Because GTA always ends up looking like shit on console

[@vale_recca]

Caucasian Invasion Not Really , How about GTA sa (2004) , GTA 3 in (1999 or 1998) , & GTA V (2013) Its All a Masterpiece.

[@westerngunsgaming9052]

Who else is pissed red dead redemtion 2 is coming out in October

[@westerngunsgaming9052]

NaughtyPudding 55 u forgot vice

[@Flourikum]

NaughtyPudding 55 Aside from GTA V Online.

[@Overneed-Belkan-Witch]

And I'm here still replaying Far Cry 3

[@jordansikes534]

1:02 The density of the games vegetation clearly dropped because of either hardware or software limitations. If anything, the contrast of the sun with the horizon of the trees is more distracting than just backdrop of complete forest. For proof, you will see this again when comparing the other early demos and trailers to the actual games release. This one of the very first examples of Ubisofts drastic graphic downgrades (even prior to the release of watchdogs). To me it's a complete travesty we didn't get to experience the earlier direction of Far Cry 3, which seemed to take more serious approach akin to Far Cry 2.

[@cloroxbleach5771]

I already finished this game more than 13 times, i've lost count but goddamn i wish the waterfall had stayed like it was in the e3 demo

[@tex3813]

Final version is wayyy better than E3 there’s no doubt

[@Vimublue]

Tex are u blind

[@ElPeppito]

Blind or shittaste?

[@7hanasi]

Blind and shit taste. Clearly doesn’t care about anything other than saturated colours

[@prateekpanwar646]

In Far Cry 3,4. Story and missions were way better, You had to plan and take every move with planning (on hard difficulty without using LMG). It had much more adventure experience. Simply, Far Cry 3 was a masterpiece

[@richard7418]

How can people say retail graphics are better? When they are clearly not. Are people blind, that they don´t see that this huge downgrade is a lot worse then Watch Dogs? I mean E3 had dynamic weather , dynamic fire which spread realistically like in Far Cry 2. Better Takedown Animations which are better then in the retail version of the game. The Takedown animations are not the same as in the E3. In the E3 version Jason kills the guard with the guard´s knife and throws it to the other guard. While in the retail he uses his own knife and throws the guard´s knife to kill the other guard. The E3 graphics were based on the CryEngine and were made to look like Crysis. Far Cry 3 also had a different story in the E3, which had a deep meaning to it. Jason had a different voice, which was a more manly and deeper voice. He also had a watch, which you can clearly see in the demo.The retail water graphics are nothing like in the E3. The E3 had underwater plants, rocks and a much clearer surface. The guns in the E3 do look better, as they have reflections to it and are more detailed. The vegetation was obviously downgraded, aswell as the shadow density and natural lightning. Also in the retail version of the game, you can´t pick up a knife or carry it with you as a melee weapon. Lensflares of the sun, were completely cut from the retail version of the game with the realistic animated vegetation like in Far Cry 2.

[@Nick930]

"The E3 graphics were based on the CryEngine and were made to look like Crysis." Where did you read that? You realize the Dunia engine is a heavily modified CryEngine built in house at Ubisoft right? It was developed after Ubisoft purchased the Far Cry name from Crytek, (who made the original Far Cry btw).

[@richard7418]

Yes, but Far Cry 3 was supposed to have better graphics to look like Crysis. Crysis was at that time very popular and was compared to Far Cry 3. So they made the E3 trailer to compare to Crysis, so more people would buy it. The watch that Jason had on his arm was supposed to be useable like in Far Cry 2 ,where you can go to bed and skip the time and watch the weather pass by.

[@richard7418]

I know that the Dunia Engine is a heavily modified CryEngine, but after Ubisoft took over with Far Cry 2. Crysis became it´s own series and after Crytech released Crysis. People started to compare Crysis with Far Cry 3. Since Far Cry 3 is based on the same engine. This is why the E3 Demo of Far Cry 3 looked a lot like Crysis.

[@mohdrazamoghul5142]

The destruction of the bridge would looked have looked great.

[@nuke2625]

The E3 version had no life. He wasn't scary and crazy enough.

[@grose8487]

FarCry 3 was my first FarCry. I remember when I didn’t have games but MW2 and my new friend from the same apartment complex I just moved in to traded games with me for 2 weeks. Long story short, that was the best 2 weeks lol Love FarCry 3! Eventually I bought my own and I still have it in my closet til this day.

[@Randomized_tv]

E3 looks like next gen

[@liamvogl1703]

Have you seen the character model of Vaas?

[@DenisLiasis]

@@liamvogl1703 I do.. he looks like he has a skeleton paintjob on his face in the final version. The e3 model looks way more realistic on his face

[@Yeiyn343]

I understand character models, but it's always strange when you notice clothing being an extra skin for the character. In other words, the pants bend with the leg and stretches the texture. :-)

[@adamashworth6293]

Damn, kermit the Frog has a KZbin channel?

[@dhoffnun]

Retail Vaas looks high as fuck. Like almost dead glassy-eyed high as fuck. Then again... so does everyone else in Far Cry 3. Seems like a theme with that game.

[@nuke2625]

Vass (E3 2011) - version lacks emotion.

[@nuke2625]

@dinkster is rejected by rebecca how?

[@Cantstandtherock]

I went all the way around to the left and never fired a single shot and jumped on the helicopter and took off. I went thru it about ten times and tried that and it worked. Great game! I’m playing New Dawn now, the animals and bad guys are much harder to kill, FC 5 was awesome!

[@bquick94]

E3 build looks SO MUCH BETTER. My biggest issue with Ubisoft. How dare they.

[@rayanekadi9995]

-E3 showed a good detials and effects about water and fog... -the final rlease showed a great textures and graphics quality and additional animations *i prefer the final because i played it and the graphics impressed me and that dooesn't require much,so thanks to ubisoft

[@cipciherif3560]

The first and the last Ubisoft game who didnt get any downgrade lol?!

[@cristianboata1380]

It's a shame that we will probably never see again a far cry as good or better than this one...

[@redi4ka951]

And that was the last Ubisoft game, released without graphics downgrade...

[@21shanks]

So they removed the ability to mount a suppressor on the 1911? I know there's a suppressed special 1911, but the normal 1911 with a suppressor upgrade would've been cool

[@xaviertyler2674]

I think this is the first time a game looked better at retail than e3

[@DineshSingh-pr4ij]

God, why doesn't this guy have 1,000,000 subs yett?

[@NoName-gp8il]

I think Vaas looked scarier and intimidating in the E3 demo. Mainly because of his highly detailed piercing eyes compared to the dull eyes in the final product. I don’t know, but that’s just me.

[@jordansikes534]

Yo I agree tbh. New Vaas technically looks more detailed but something looks really off.

[@thesouthwillriseagain1984]

00:59 that soldier looks much more better than retail

[@potatosoup9536]

If I am to be completely honest, the E3 version looked way cooler. Jason even has a snazzy wristwatch!

[@Darkwolfolmy]

Or how you could equip the the machete and how you see Jason actually take the knife from the pirates sheath those are the changes I wish they never changed