Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) Rule 801(d)(1)(A) - prior inconsistent statements

[@abhinavgarg6487]

Easily the best presentation of the rules of evidence. Thank you Professor.

[@isabelburgos4514]

You are THE BEST!!! Thanks for this beautiful explanation, Professor. I love you

[@agmartir]

I'm taking evidence now. These videos are so helpful! Thank you.

[@gerardmatar]

Great presentation of complicated information we are covering class! Thanks :)

[@akashgehlawat3433]

Thanks a lot, this sub-point was killing me. Great presentation!!!

[@BitterComments]

Thanks dude, your videos are proving greatly useful :)

[@professorporter]

Glad you like them!

[@cballer77]

Can you do this on cross? For example, if I have prior statement from Bob at a Grand Jury hearing that "Jim is a liar," and then on cross I ask Bob if Jim is a liar and Bob says no, can I then use 801(d)(1)(A) to admit Bob's statement from in front of the Grand Jury both for impeachment of Bob and for the truth of the matter?

[@professorporter]

Yes. Of course. Impeachment by prior inconsistent statement typically occurs on cross

[@MustafaAli-ey5oy]

How I do contac professor port to asked questions

[@AnneOrtiz88]

Very helpful! Thank you

[@professorporter]

You're welcome!

[@edadams376]

👍🏽👍🏽