Fenix vs. FSLabs Comparison Part 3 -Cabin and Cargo-

[@MrEmbargo1985]

Hello guys. As described, I am only concerned with an objective comparison of the capabilities of the two addons. Test.exe, malware or other topics from the past are not the topic. Please note this. I will remove any comments, as they are not effective.

[@AK-oy7wd]

Fenix is better

[@nipotin-1374]

With more years of développement

[@Cursory3]

@nipotin-1374 And FS Labs having a rocky history KEKW.

[@dazbike3247]

@nipotin-1374 FS Labs has been 4 years and a much newer product, but they did not raise the bar graphically.

[@nipotin-1374]

@@dazbike3247 yeah I know but I wanted to say that let's let fslabs adapt as we do with fenix, and I think as we upgrade we will have a more conclusive model

[@YohamYT]

@nipotin-1374 Fenix and FSL started development at roughly the same time, Fenix just got to the market faster.

[@HMSDaring1]

Yeah - It'll be Fenix for me then. Once MSFS24 gets more stable I'll be buying the Fenix. Unsure what the FSLabs team thought, it's a good aircraft but in direct comparison to Fenix it's inferior, they could have developed an A330 or A340 and would have secured a good market for themselves.

[@denziiey]

Especially the A340

[@Petercrossed]

I guess it depends on your system. Fenix, even in experimental, is working great for me.

[@robbyyant6213]

@@denziiey The A340 is an interesting aircraft but it's too rare nowadays. Only a few airlines still fly them and those airlines only use them on a handful of flights. The A340 was always overshadowed by the 747 because of its capacity and performance. It could technically fly further but sacrificed too many other things to do so. An A330 would be better and allow for more variance if you wanted to simulate real world flights.

[@HERD599]

@@robbyyant6213 Some people don't go all out on realism and fly airlines that usto operate aircraft or aircraft that aren't used on real world routes. An a340 would be loved by many

[@pendolinofan643]

The FS labs reminds me of Plastic a bit and the issues of the past, I’m staying on my Fenix

[@tvflight7858]

can you compare the sounds?

[@MrEmbargo1985]

Yes it is planned.

[@Petercrossed]

Can the MCDU be transferred to a tablet like Fenix ?

[@MrEmbargo1985]

@@Petercrossed yes it’s possible.

[@PT197429]

❤ Fenix all the way

[@talking2388]

I would by anything Fenix puts out. Fenix is at the top for aircraft. Does anyone know what is next for them? A350? A340 ? Gulfstream? Maybe ? lol

[@MrEmbargo1985]

@@talking2388 I think Fenix developing on a Neo as well.

[@OneAviation]

Cool

[@Sy-T007]

I did not notice just how bad FSlabs is until you put it up against a far superior product

[@radoslavtucakov1127]

FENIX is and will stay my choice just because I won't support devs that used to install malware with their products. PERIOD!

[@TheRealDenzelman]

Fenix by TKO ! #Fenix4Life

[@piku9431]

FSLabs have already disgraced themselves once. They don't have a second chance.

[@gemutlicherbar7263]

You are comparising a place holder?! The FS Labs Cabin is not finished- so be fair.

[@MrEmbargo1985]

@@gemutlicherbar7263 Yes, I do that because it’s what you currently get for $70. If anything changes, we can make a new comparison. That’s why the version numbers are also included in the introduction, to avoid any misunderstandings.

[@sticknrudder1903]

And, fslabs had been developing the Airbus for MSFS for a some time, but the Fenix reached much further in a shorter time compared to what fslabs could, and it's cheaper. I think that says a lot.

[@eduardobonadio7581]

The modern state of accepting/giving a break to $70 unfinished products is ridiculous. Fair comparison

[@gemutlicherbar7263]

@@eduardobonadio7581 :D unfinished. Well unfornatley there is no need for a cabin at all. Its about the flight systems and the cockpit. "Unfinished" is today nearly every product. But they do not call it ea - the build up on it with updates. Merry Xmas, Friend