i fell in love with you, my god i have been trying to get this type of explanation for 3 days , YOU ARE GREAT , WORLD NEEDS MORE TEACHERS LIKE YOU!!.
@JordanEdmundsEECS5 жыл бұрын
Thank you :)
@ocayaro4 жыл бұрын
It is interesting to explain to students what happens at T = 0K. The way that I do it is to divide the interval into two, piecewise continuous energy intervals. Then, we note that the exponents will either be negative or positive. Then taking limits with T -> 0K, we note that f(E) tends to 1 on the left interval and to 0 on the rightmost interval. I teach solid-state and semiconductor physics at a university in South Africa and I still enjoy watching your videos for their intuitive approach.
@gawayne13744 жыл бұрын
4:40 does quantum physics, but feels unsure about counting. The life of a scientist
@faizanhasan97154 жыл бұрын
Awesome professor. I have no words to thank you! Extremely well explained. The whole semiconductor series got me A+ grade in exams and will definitely help me in my career too. I would like to thank you from the bottom of my heart.
@JordanEdmundsEECS4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Faizan :) this makes me happy to hear.
@kaixuanyang12504 жыл бұрын
Hello, Mr. Jordan Edmunds, I am a student in China, currently studying semiconductor device physics.Your video has given me a lot of benefits, I hope I can move your video bilibili, let more people see this video.We hope to get your approval and look forward to your reply
@sofiallacer59512 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for your explanation! It was very useful when learning about semiconductors in solid-state physics. I just wanted to mention that generally one writes 1000K, not 1000 'degrees' K. Keep it up with the great content!
@maximh11634 жыл бұрын
Writing °K instead of K is kind of cringe
@theonewhoaskedtheonewhocar9780 Жыл бұрын
😭😭
@junpengwang24734 жыл бұрын
3 mathematicians disliked this
@sanyamkaul92395 жыл бұрын
6:49 - Temp. should be 300K. Kelvin scale is not a 'degree' scale like C and F. By the way amazing explanation! Thanks for the video.
@JordanEdmundsEECS5 жыл бұрын
Haha yup I actually learned that from an identical comment a few months ago. Many thanks :)
@sanyamkaul92395 жыл бұрын
@@JordanEdmundsEECS That was me saying to myself, "Atleast I know something" haha.. Keep up the amazing work!
@aatt32094 жыл бұрын
Bravo, fantastic lecturer, I am hooked on your series. Moving onto the next lesson.
@NickKek-pz8kc2 жыл бұрын
Im from germany, ive watched multiple german videos, red about it but never understood anything, but this video, which is english and normally hard to understand for me, explained it all perfectly. Thank you very much.
@eddill26387 ай бұрын
Same here, damn that's a great video
@salanove5 жыл бұрын
Hi. Thanks for the videos first of all. Just one question... you say that Ef is known, we can calculate it... I'm struggling quite a lot to see how can one actually know the value of Ef??
@JordanEdmundsEECS5 жыл бұрын
In this video, I assumed that EF was known. In general, we calculate EF using the doping of the semiconductor (EF = kT*ln(ND/ni) for n-type semiconductors). It's basically cheating. We're using the idea of EF to derive a bunch of cool stuff, and *then* we're calculating what EF actually is for any given semiconductor.
@N0ob.At.Life.9363 жыл бұрын
Not sure how well this applies to semi-conductor physics, but in thermal physics we use chemical potential µ instead of E_F for the same equation. We can find µ by deriving Energy with respect to number of particles while keeping the entropy and volumes of the system constant
@SciHeartJourney2 жыл бұрын
Wow, only 3 minutes in and this video has made this so much easier to understand than after 3 weeks of reading our textbook! Thank you so very much. 👍👍👍🎩
@JordanEdmundsEECS2 жыл бұрын
xD Dear god trying to read solid state textbooks. Often rough. Anything in particular you think that made it easy to understand?
@SciHeartJourney2 жыл бұрын
@@JordanEdmundsEECS I think the graphics along with the explanation that bring it to life and therefore easier to understand.
@zinhaboussi2 жыл бұрын
thank you so much awesome explanation
@Galileosays3 ай бұрын
kT is the thermal energy. the ratio (E-Ef)/kT defines the ratio between electronic kinetic energy and thermal energy (random atom vibration). So if (E-E`F)/kT >> 1 than the free electrons have more knietic energy than the random motion of the atoms in the lattice. If (E-E`F)/kT 0 than there will be free electrons, that could be in the conduction band. For E-Ef
@danielcollins484710 ай бұрын
I'm an undergrad chemical engineering student at Texas. Currently brushing up on all of semiconductor physics before an internship interview with a big semiconductor company. I really appreciate these videos! You present quantum mechanics in a very intuitive way, while still conveying a lot of information. You are gonna save me in this interview. Thank you so much!
@iansweet89783 ай бұрын
Hey, love the video! I couldn’t help but notice the shape of the fermi function looks a lot like windowing functions used in discrete and continuous signal processing. In those cases, attenuation of the amplitude as you get further from the 0 point on the x axis is expressed in dB. I was wondering if there’s anything similar for the fermi function
@54Immortal4 жыл бұрын
Thanks this is a great video, really helped me understand. But just wondering, why do you use °K instead of just K for Kelvin.
@Chunat3 жыл бұрын
OMG, I don't need other materials to understand semiconductors, if not throughly, but more than I needed than your video. Thank you so much!
@mattkan32753 жыл бұрын
You teach much better than the professor
@anonymousperson7390 Жыл бұрын
I hope someone would explain Bose - Einstein distribution like this.
@wertzuio21273 ай бұрын
Great explanation. Was a very good refresher for me!
@MUZICAVECHESIBUNA4 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for the explanation! Really helped me in understanding the graph. Congratulations, you have very nice lessons.
@rhs56833 жыл бұрын
I am becaming a mathematican, but I gave you I like, because you are able to explain that physics-stuff.
@rhs56833 жыл бұрын
P.S. We will say: "x lim-> + \infinity (1/x) = 0"
@annankldun4040 Жыл бұрын
You should really mention that it's not the number of electrons you find but the electron DENSITY.
@SumriseHD3 жыл бұрын
Why don't you participate in Khan Academy?
@KiyanAmirian11 ай бұрын
thank you very much for your explanations, they are very very useful.
@luwang4043 жыл бұрын
I found this channel just recently. Have watched some videos. Wow! I feel like I found a diamond mine. Thank you for such high quality contents.
@tejobhiru10924 жыл бұрын
awesomesssst of explanations...!!! indebted to you , jordan..!!!
@nadirbouziani46202 жыл бұрын
wish they teach us like this in college thank you very much
@sinpi6332 Жыл бұрын
Bro you deserve Noble
@hongfeiy4763 жыл бұрын
you are absolut top for teaching .thank you so much
@fritzahern13802 жыл бұрын
absolute blessing finding this channel, thank you
@IremBatbey3 ай бұрын
Great video!! ^^
@armeshasharma23343 жыл бұрын
nicely explained.... :) really good
@rationalthinker9612 Жыл бұрын
Where are you getting Ef = 0.5 ? I have googled fermi energy and I can't find any tables with values???
@nikhilmani15 жыл бұрын
In one of your early video in the comment section you have written "A single state can have only one electron. But at a single energy we can actually have two states, or two spins (these states are called degenerate)". But at time ~4.22 in this video you said f(E0)=0.2 means an electron in one of the bucket out of 5, why not 2 electrons in a single bucket since you are dealing with f(E0) and not directly with states?
@JordanEdmundsEECS5 жыл бұрын
That’s a really great and subtle question! It actually took me a bit of thinking. In my analogy, the “buckets” correspond to individual states, not individual energies. If they corresponded to energies, then we would indeed expect 2 electrons in each ‘bucket’, as you pointed out.
@nikhilmani15 жыл бұрын
@@JordanEdmundsEECS This means corresponding to the concern energy value we have 5 degeneracy. And in that case, I am bit confused, if we consider spin up and spin down electrons then how they will be orientated in each degeneracy according to the Pauli's rule?
@sachingurjar51962 жыл бұрын
this is miraculous for me i cant express what is the level of teaching . i cant understand it without you you gave me what i searching for thank you for making this type of video
@JordanEdmundsEECS2 жыл бұрын
Thank you :) Anything in particular you liked about it?
@eriknunezalbermann99932 жыл бұрын
Clear explanation, appreciate it
@0403AUSTIN2 жыл бұрын
thanks
@JordanEdmundsEECS2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@ServitorSkull2 жыл бұрын
Oooo new microphone 🥸👍
@nauman5435 жыл бұрын
Its very nice explanation. If possible i just want to ask what is chemical potential and what its role in fermi dirac distribution function because in some books we have seen chemical potential instead of fermi energy. thanks
@JordanEdmundsEECS5 жыл бұрын
Yeah I believe the electrochemical potential is equivalent to the Fermi energy. It’s basically a way of discribing equilibrium by encapsulating the energy to due diffusion (the chemical part) and the energy due to electric fields (the electro-part) into a single energy.
@nauman5435 жыл бұрын
@@JordanEdmundsEECS thank u very much
@milesknudtson80222 жыл бұрын
We can fudge it
@hashbanah40744 жыл бұрын
Such a great series, really clear explanations !!
@joaquincapo84865 жыл бұрын
So you are saying that a state is the energy/momentum electrons and holes are able to give to the mean or system where they are?
@JordanEdmundsEECS5 жыл бұрын
A *state* just represents an energy/momentum the electrons are *allowed* to have within the semiconductor. The energy and momentum that electron has will indeed determine how it interacts with the rest of the system (for example if it crashes into an atom it will deliver some of its momentum and energy to that atom).
@BrikaEXE2 жыл бұрын
Impressive
@shubham19995 жыл бұрын
You say that a state can contain n no. of electrons. But according to what I have read, a state can contain only one electron or no electron. But in your derivation of Gibbs factor you have used P(N) as the probability fn representing a state containing N electrons.
@JordanEdmundsEECS5 жыл бұрын
Yup! Everything you said is correct. The Gibbs factor, however, is more general and can be used for things other than electrons (both bosons and fermions). So for electrons, N can only take the value 0 or 1. For photons, it can take any value.
@shubham19995 жыл бұрын
@@JordanEdmundsEECS Oh. Ok. Means by N, you means 0 or 1.
@JordanEdmundsEECS5 жыл бұрын
Yes sir
@shubham19995 жыл бұрын
@@JordanEdmundsEECS Sir, were you taught Quantum Mechanics in your Bachelor's Degree of EE. We were only given a general introduction in freshmen year. Currently, I am a sophomore. Did you also have a Machines course?
@JordanEdmundsEECS5 жыл бұрын
I have taken a class on thermal physics, which covers statistical mechanics (the fermi-Dirac function, etc.), but have not taken an upper-division physics course on quantum mechanics yet. It’s more of a hobby
@bic13492 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@JordanEdmundsEECS2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@MrMishra8145 жыл бұрын
What exactly is a state?
@JordanEdmundsEECS5 жыл бұрын
I love that question. Precisely speaking, a “state” is a unique solution to the time-independent Schrodinger equation. Solving the Schrodinger equation basically tells you how much energy/momentum electrons and holes are allowed to have given the system they are in (here, a crystal).
@MrMishra8145 жыл бұрын
@@JordanEdmundsEECS Thanks for the prompt response. Your explanation makes sense.