Annie Ernaux was in my hometown Belgrade in Serbia, 20 years ago, to promote her novels and she likes to read books from our author who died at age 54,Danilo Kiš(he was also candidate for Nobel Prize and he lived in Paris till his death) We knew here that Annie is a strong candidate for the prize long time ago.
@ARVINDKUMAR-tk6wi2 жыл бұрын
Superb video! And timely! Very meaningful! I appreciate the labour you put in for collecting the material for videos for fiction beast. You are doing a yeoman’s job by creating literary interest in the minds of people. Thank you!
@forzapound34822 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂 you made me laugh for real thank you, I bet that you never read a single book of that institutional fake talent...
@Fiction_Beast2 жыл бұрын
So nice of you
@markspano34682 жыл бұрын
I’m almost finished with The Years. She is quite remarkable. So good to discover such a talented artist.
@giulianademedici6912 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Your videos always give us a deep sight on the author and inspire us to see further
@supramentalmanifestation2 жыл бұрын
1000 Thanks, Matt. Your videos are always inspiring.
@sesh73572 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for posting this important video
@Reza0902 жыл бұрын
Thanks. The books about the famous paintings and artists that you placed on the table at one point were quite interesting. Reviewing great artists and their paintings/sculptures would be great too.
@Fiction_Beast2 жыл бұрын
Good suggestion but it’s a whole different skill to analyze visual art
@phchoucri12 жыл бұрын
Très bon travail de votre part ! Merci à vous.
@MrUndersolo4 ай бұрын
I've read a few of the books since she's won the prize. I'm very impressed with her ability to dredge so much from her experience into her work.
@wrlsenglish17852 жыл бұрын
very informative thanks alot for your collective fore you put in this clip.
@ganesankalimuthu71222 жыл бұрын
Thank you Fiction B...for useful informations
@VickiNikolaidis2 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I learned much.
@JustinFisher7772 жыл бұрын
She reminds me a bit of Virginia Woolf. A road which leads back to Proust.
@rameshbhole2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@buddymac39932 жыл бұрын
Wow! What a prolific and multi faceted writer who stays devoted to her beliefs!! Truly deserving of this Nobel prize!!!🇨🇦
@maryseokley60612 жыл бұрын
Courageous... woman, representing us all🦋🕊️👁️
@JustinFisher7772 жыл бұрын
The parts of Proust I have most trouble with are those long boring parties and balls he attends. Something something social something or other. How does one get through that inanity? How does that kind of writing compare to Ernauds kind? Perhaps Proust saw himself as something apart, passing through them. And Ernaud would see herself as inseparable. Faulkner wrote with Proust in his veins. He made the history of the South part of the memory in the background. In some ways like how Proust wrote about the history of the nobles at Balbec, various Brabants.
@milesknightestrada32862 жыл бұрын
At this stage, they'll hand it off to almost anybody.
@madinaurinova7512 жыл бұрын
thank you so much for the video. Very informative))
@mr12345678991112 жыл бұрын
A most deserving awardee...
@JustinFisher7772 жыл бұрын
The point about Tolstoy is interesting. I remember that epilogue at the end of war and peace and how this book that everybody references has this ultimate dim philosophical view which everybody, at least in the west would have a tantrum over. And yet. And yet. The current strange circling back of the individual identity into the realm of group essentialism. And perhaps Ernaux signaling it. Though I haven't read enough of her to know.
@animamagna30772 жыл бұрын
In the past, when you'd find out that the Nobel prize went to a laureate whose works you read and sometimes heavily, it was recognition. Now you're discovering a new author (whoever age) when she's gotten the prize and you find it on the news. Feel the difference.
@DjCyberio2 жыл бұрын
She’s already very well known in France
@ganesankalimuthu71222 жыл бұрын
@@DjCyberio Thank you for more information
@mainahgruau66312 жыл бұрын
She's really well known lol... Her books are on school curriculums
@behemoth53442 жыл бұрын
@@mainahgruau6631 i think the meaning of Mahatma's comment is that in the past even the hoi polloi used to read, to quote but three examples, Kipling, Shaw, Hemingway, while now we're too busy with TikTok and Netflix to know any of the hottest writers. Madame Ernaux may be really well known in France as Signor Fo is famous in Italy but I wouldn't say they are internationally acknowledged names. Maybe literature is less relevant than it used to be. Maybe the Nobel prize is less relevant than it used to be. At any rate, I'ma give this broad a chance and thank the Swedes for the smorgasbord of authors they've allowed me to get to know along the years.
@richardwestwood82122 жыл бұрын
I feel the difference yeah
@sparshhardik2 жыл бұрын
well summarised. thanks!
@Fiction_Beast2 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@cappy22822 жыл бұрын
Nowadays the Nobel Prizes are given for political reasons and have very little to do with acknowledging greatness. I don't wanna say this woman deserves the prize or not (I don't know anything about her) but she seems ok from what you're saying. She may have actually deserved it. God bless her 🙏 P.s Obama got the Nobel peace prize yrs ago and that was the end of me taking the awards seriously 😂
@BigHenFor2 жыл бұрын
Then you don't understand the power of the symbolic. Although Obama's name was on it, it was really an award to the United States for having evolved enough beyond its own history with racism and slavery, to have a black president. It was the Nobel Committee trying to be creative within the boundaries set up by Nobel's trust, and to make the Nobel Prize relevant in the socio-political domain to more people. Most people go through life with the Nobel Prize have only a peripheral influence on their lives, so not even people take it that seriously, in the sense they want people to. They just get on with their daily lives. Only if one is in a domain where such prestige is seen important, one can quite happily exist knowing nothing about Nobel Prize winners, as many people do. I'm here for the curiosity, and to support Fiction Beast.
@cappy22822 жыл бұрын
@@BigHenFor lol I appreciate your "psuedo intellectual" argument and I'm well aware of the power of symbolism....but (president or not) Obama is not that symbol. Nothing "peaceful" about the "drone striker in Chief" and putting his name on the award because of the color of his skin is even more of a disgrace (that's actually the opposite of what America stands for and no American should except an award with that pretext 😂) 1) The man made race relations worse with divisive identity politics and rarely (if ever) mentioned American progress 2) America evolved beyond it's own history 50+yrs ago" B) I understand the awards mean nothing to most people but they should at least try to keep some semblance of decency....for historical purposes
@prasoonjha18162 жыл бұрын
I think Nobel Peace Prize has lost its credibility but the other Nobel prizes are fine.
@guneygul43032 жыл бұрын
Thank you 🌹
@erickgarcia93772 жыл бұрын
Could you make a video on The Penal Colony by Kafka? Its recently been one of my favorite short stories and i would love to hear your thoughts
@Fiction_Beast2 жыл бұрын
good suggestion.
@sumiksisar6400 Жыл бұрын
what is the name of annie ernauxs Nobel winning biographical book??
@gracefitzgerald22272 жыл бұрын
That was fantastic! I also like Simone Bouviea over Sartre. She must of been a great writer to have her name in the same sentence as Proust. Funny is that when Jim Morrison died, the snobs in France didn’t want him in the same cemetery as Proust. I think this is funny because Proust was way wilder than Morrison could’ve ever been.
@francinesicard4642 жыл бұрын
Wilder maybe but boring as hell and Jim Morrison wasn't! In the last 50 years, I have tried several times to read "Du côté de chez Swan", the first volume of "La Recherche du Temps perdu" and never got further than the first chapter. Still on the shelf!
@gracefitzgerald22272 жыл бұрын
@@francinesicard464 there’s something you and Sartre had in common. Proust wasn’t his cup of tea either. 😀
@mageetu2 жыл бұрын
@@francinesicard464 Might be your loss.
@DrSylva22 Жыл бұрын
How can I find Annie’s Email???
@paddy6542 жыл бұрын
Excellent review as usual, you almost oblige me to keep buying and reading books. Thanks for maintaining my book addiction. In the same line I would ask you to include also booker price winners. I am about to start with latest by the Sri Lankan author.❤
@Fiction_Beast2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@slm80252 жыл бұрын
Strange how an empty shell of a HUMAN, she should feel so strongly about worry about her "responsibility".
@charlieintheclouds2 жыл бұрын
she looks like a mixture of Meryl Streep and JK Rowling
@wajailyas42822 жыл бұрын
I have never heard of her, however, she must possess the credentials therefore, this prize s awarded to her
@nickpeitchev77632 жыл бұрын
I'll check her out but I'm seriously doubtful that she's better than Murakami. Another year of the Don being snubbed :(((
@dabangify2 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@solnassant12912 жыл бұрын
I'm French and a huge fan of Proust (the goat). I've read her too and she's nice but in nooooo way does she (or anyone bar Tolstoi maybe) compare to Proust
@Philover2 жыл бұрын
where does Proust say that?
@Fiction_Beast2 жыл бұрын
Which one?
@Philover2 жыл бұрын
@@Fiction_Beast you get what you want by the time you stop wanting what you wanted or something like that- you mention this in the video
@Fiction_Beast2 жыл бұрын
It's not a direct quote. It's a conclusion you get from reading his novel.
@Philover2 жыл бұрын
@@Fiction_Beast which one?
@divinepiccolo94692 жыл бұрын
thanks
@AA-mj4sn2 жыл бұрын
"The Nobel Prize is given to french author Annie Ernaux." People in France : "Who?"
@marielebars7233 Жыл бұрын
This is not true. She is well known in France, even if she is not appreciated by all, due to her very special style.
@AA-mj4sn11 ай бұрын
@@marielebars7233 I garante you that she's really not that famous, for the majority of the population at least. There was a lot of people who asked that question on internet when this came out.
@pinkyshandilya6522 жыл бұрын
Here due to fear of exam..lol
@ektamehra87242 жыл бұрын
Ugc net?
@latikaaaaaa2 жыл бұрын
😉
@marekkrajewski96622 жыл бұрын
Never heard of her.
@sharontheodore82162 жыл бұрын
Excellent synopsis enough to make me avoid buying her wokish work. Many thanks.
@LearnThaiRapidMethod2 жыл бұрын
I also am equivocal about her and her works. She’s a rabid - and rather ignorant, uninformed - anti-Semite, supports BDS and doesn’t understand what Apartheid is. I looked at one of her works and it seemed dull and rather emotionless.
@richardwestwood8212 Жыл бұрын
She was awarded the stupid Nobel prize because she follows the agenda of "cultural politics", feminism, women's health issues and stuff. Literary merit alone will get you nowhere. Many Nobel laureates are now in the archives and nobody reads them, and some of the greatest literary geniuses were never awarded the stupid prize; like Tolstoy, Chekov, Borges, Proust, James Joyce, Malraux, Claudel, Nabokov, Rilke, etc. The number of the swedish laureates alone is higher than all the laureates of Asia combined!!! What does that mean??? Bob Dylan won the prize while in America alone Cormac McCarthy, William gaddis, Pynchon and Phillip Roth were still alive. Many writers around the world are now campaigning to end this stupid prize once for all.
@michelez715 Жыл бұрын
The Nobel Prize for literature is not "stupid" just because you don't agree with some of the choices. Many awards are given to people whom others think are unworthy of it, from the Oscars to things like the Pulitzer, the Turner Prize for Art, and the Sterling Prize for Architecture. The aim of these awards is good, I don't see anything stupid about them, though I don't always agree with the choices.
@richardwestwood8212 Жыл бұрын
@@michelez715 you mentioned the Oscars and this sums it up. What I'm saying is Nobel prize for literature is not given on the basis of literary merit, POLITICS is involved, the swedish royal academy itself says that.... If you don't know a thing about excellent literature what I wrote is not intended for you, all you did is prove my point. Stay with the commercial decadent culture of Hollywood, hip-hop and punk rock
@ly_lu5923 Жыл бұрын
Better is read the works of a writer before go ahead with so precipitated conclusions.
@kristine69962 жыл бұрын
💐🇫🇷🌳🇫🇷💐 📝📝📝
@manucao85942 жыл бұрын
Houellebecq deserve it better
@xing30102 жыл бұрын
guess that will make me 2 nd comment XD
@meditationmusic24992 жыл бұрын
Ist comment
@worldobserver35152 жыл бұрын
A ridiculous choice.
@worldobserver35152 жыл бұрын
@Of the Refrain 6,000, so what? What a dumb response. I have never read one of her books, because I have never heard of her, which was the point of my comment. Another stupid choice by the Nobel committee. But, hey, she supports abortion, right? Very important when considering the literature prize.
@e7m102 жыл бұрын
Should've gone to Cormac McCarthy. He deserves one in his lifetime.