Buy the $200 Rokinon and save the $25,800 for more important things, like catering.
@reddjinn9112 жыл бұрын
😂
@adamdrakestudio2 жыл бұрын
this made me chuckle in the future
@TheBrechbuehler2 жыл бұрын
hell jeah. NEVER forget the food! without good food, even the best lens will not work well with me behind it 😀
@zebius41572 жыл бұрын
>you actually think that people buy lenses like master primes instead of renting Lol, lmao
@CoppersmithProductions2 жыл бұрын
@@zebius4157 It was a joke, bro. You must be a producer. LOL!
@deastman23 жыл бұрын
This was a very informative video. If you’re shooting a larger production with a budget which can support the use of expensive lenses, it only makes sense to go that route. However, the other takeaway from this is that budget gear these days is REALLY good, and you can easily get away with filming shorts and low budget features without breaking the bank.
@dmattei7603 жыл бұрын
I love that they're so comparable. It's such a major blessing that we have access to such gorgeous lenses for such affordable prices. It's never been easier to make a film.
@EpicLightMedia3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video. I love stuff like this. Now i want some master prime lenses...
@BrianMakesFilms3 жыл бұрын
Honestly the fact that the Rokinon performs this well compared to a master prime is kind of mind blowing. Not saying they're comparable side by side, but the difference is far less in a lot of these examples than I expected. I don't think if you've got a compelling story anyone is going to look at a low budget film shot on the Rokinon lenses and lament it wasn't shot on a Master Prime. I have Rokinon and Sigma lenses mostly, and I've been generally very happy with the results I'm getting. Lately been loving the Helios 44-2 for short films because it has a lot of the imperfections of an anamorphic lens even though it's not actually anamorphic. Even though I've got the standard version, not the modified fake anamorphic one, I really love it. One of these days I might try and pick up the new Sirui 50mm t2.9 Full Frame lens, or rent it to see what I think of it.
@AFuller20202 жыл бұрын
Its more gear freaking, I use a smartphone or action camera and make content.
@AnimeZone2472 жыл бұрын
@@AFuller2020 you want a cookie
@Fushikatz3 жыл бұрын
This Test misses the biggest advantage lenses like the Masterprimes have and that is consistency. Every lens in a Set performs the same and even beyond that. One can rent a set in LA, than move Production to Berlin or whatever and rent another set there and both sets will perform the same. With lenses like the Rokinons every lens has their own quirks. The 35mm might have a magenta tint, the 50mm gets super soft at T1.5 and the 100mm might introduce orange flare.
@doityourself9493 жыл бұрын
Supposedly fixed with the Xeen line.
@TechnoBabble3 жыл бұрын
The Rokinon Cine DS line is apparently colour matched. Obviously that doesn't fix the sharpness, glare, flares, etc. with the optics... but you shouldn't get different colour casts between them.
@Fushikatz3 жыл бұрын
@@RoccoRichardson i think so, because for two reasons. First: Arri Master Primes aren't Owner Operator Lenses. They are bought by rental houses. And as a rental you want to guarantee quality and not create more work in post for the clients. Second: Sure colour correction can fix it and for a short film that might not even a big deal, but on a 90-120min feature, that creates a lot of pain in the backdoor. I dont wnat to say the Rokinons dont have their place. Heck I even own a 16mm. I just wanted to point out that there is a big part overlooked in the video.
@veryboringname.2 жыл бұрын
The Rokinons are so cheap that you wouldn't rent them, you'd just buy them. They'd then perform the same every time you use them in Berlin or LA, because they're literally the same. :) edit: get the color matched set of course
@Fushikatz2 жыл бұрын
@@veryboringname. yes. One wouldnt rent the Rokinons, as one wouldnt buy the Master Primes.
@CaptainSinbad3 жыл бұрын
Anamorphic lenses for the win! I’ve been more and more drawn to those imperfections
@CalebResponds3 жыл бұрын
Nice to see you out here studying the craft captain, greatness is coming.
@MaxRovensky3 жыл бұрын
I built myself an anamorphic contraption from a disassembled soviet projector lens + some 3d printed parts + Helios 44m Massive pain in the ass to use but man did it look freaking gorgeous
@Tricumulairdesigns3 жыл бұрын
Great compaire! The ‘purple haze’ looks more like IR pollution, especially compared to the greenish look the rokinon has in a studio enviroment 😅
@AllThingsFilm12 жыл бұрын
I just rewatched this a second time. And I noticed you were using the BMPCCK camera for the Rokinon lens. As I recall, the Blackmagic cameras were known for capturing IR pollution in the shadows. Usually showing up in the form of a purple/magenta cast in the shadows. So, I'm wondering if that color cast you saw in the exterior shots in the baseball cap were more from the IR pollution coming from the Blackmagic capture and not the Rokinon lens.
@douds56172 жыл бұрын
yes its definitely IR pollution
@thenightninja132 жыл бұрын
They are on the same 12k cameras... Not pockets. timestamp 3:50
@KenzoVerseYT2 жыл бұрын
@@thenightninja13 they are using blackmagic cameras tho, they could have the same issue.
@thenightninja132 жыл бұрын
@@KenzoVerseYT Yes, they are using the same cameras. One is getting ir pollution at 7:29 from a lens that isn't as well protected as the other. They are blackmagic camera systems, but they aren't the pocket cinema cameras, both shots are being shot on the 12k cameras. It isn't the camera, it's the lens. Now an IR filter might fix that issue. But it's most likely a coating in the expensive lens that makes the difference, not a testing with different cameras issue because they were all shot on the same cameras (as can be seen at 3:50)
@popcorndreamsmedia3 жыл бұрын
There is a clear difference even with KZbin compression. The zeiss contrast level is pretty amazing and the rokinon tens to milky the contrast but for the money it is a lovely little stylised lens.
@cheapomedia3 жыл бұрын
If you're a DP, don't show this to a producer. This is way too honest, he won't care about the haze and he won't get you those sexy master primes.
@Milan-cf1xe3 жыл бұрын
hahahahahah
@Milan-cf1xe3 жыл бұрын
if it was up to the producer the film would be shot on a single prime lens
@Pietje_Piraat3 жыл бұрын
No one notices the difference. Its as if a wine conaisseur is trying to sell a chateau lafitte 1968 to an alcoholic. No one notices if it was shot on a scandalously expensive lens or not. And those who do notice, are not important enough to care about anyway. A producer only.looks at what it costs and if the product sells. He could care less for the glass it was shot with.
@LoFiAxolotl2 жыл бұрын
@@Milan-cf1xe would be shot on a EF 50mm they found on a flea market for $10 with fungus inside
@WhySteve3 жыл бұрын
I've spent HOURS looking for what gear certain films have used so shotonwhat is a lifesaver, thank you!
@jeditsuyoshi3 жыл бұрын
Funny you post this... I just bought some of these 200$ lens two days ago... yes, I love the expensive ones. But these cheap ones work most of the time just fine.
@marcosortiz53492 жыл бұрын
Truth of the matter is... the Rokinon is an outstanding lens. In your outdoor comparisons, if you set your aperture higher, 11+ you'll get a much cleaner background, less shallow, thus improving the quality of the shot. The beauty of prime lenses! Also, in doing this very good video, which I appreciate, it is important to include the T-Stops, Aperture and Shutter Speed as reference. I own Samyang and Rokinon lenses. They are wonderful lenses for the price and in all truth, again, what really matter is, what's in the frame. I like your channel and content. Good job.
@Ziggz473 жыл бұрын
Loved this episode and the comparison on what you can pull off with each lens
@risbill13 жыл бұрын
An average person watching a movie made with the Rokinon lens would not even notice.
@pilkfilms3 жыл бұрын
The only cheap vs expensive video I trust.
@moewe0403 жыл бұрын
Film Riot is slowly but surely becoming my new Video Copilot. Love the episodes, all the Information that are given in such an entertaining form, compact and fun. PS: That Thumbnail is cursed! :D
@glenkennedy97582 жыл бұрын
Honestly found the easiest way to compare the two lenses was in that focal length change between Cam A and B - otherwise really impressed by the Rokinon here - encouraging for filmmakers like myself - who get access to cine lenses on some shoots but wouldn't necessarily be able to afford for personal projects
@KyleCulver3 жыл бұрын
Love the approach of more natural judgement rather than the scientific one. This was very informative and educational. Thank you! Also, I had never heard of shotonwhat before! Thank you!!
@jonathanhornby3 жыл бұрын
Shooting weddings as a side gig for the past four years may reveal my affinity for flashy parties, but perhaps that experience is helpful here. I also shoot videos in the Army full time and love all things photography. When shooting video, I started with with Rokinon’s 85mm f/1.4 and 14mm f/2.8 on my Sony full frames which were a boon for me at the time. Later when I upgraded to Sony-Zeiss primes and Tamron SP lenses I realized the Rokinons are more of a gateway lens than a substitute. Under less-than ideal conditions, which is every condition at weddings, on-location shoots, and every day in the army, the differences are enormous. Quality glass gives you options. Quality glass delivers. Quality glass saves you endless hours in editing. Quality equipment saves your ass when you’re expected to produce quality videos without a controlled environment.
@mariapelzer8005 Жыл бұрын
9:07 I’d still use the rokinons for bigger screenings too
@T-MoneyBaby3 жыл бұрын
All the tips and advice you have given me over the years I’m hoping to work with you one day Ryan 🙏🏽
@dominicstonekaiser91613 жыл бұрын
Great episode! I need a reference sometimes and this is grounding and thoughtful. The practical thought in this episode always makes me smile. I understand why you chose the master primes now on the last horror film you did. Thanks my peeps.
@markoboychuk2 жыл бұрын
Crazy how close they are given the drastic price difference!
@charlesfcpx2 жыл бұрын
sheesh thank you for having this up cause I was looking up a kit of rokinon lens
@masoncooper32902 жыл бұрын
Hey, this is a cool video. Can you tell me what brand of glasses are in 3:21?
@funnysapiens3 жыл бұрын
Suddenly I realized my sensei Ryan is getting old, I'm also getting old, I kinda grew up with film riot, I was a teenager when I used to watch their videos and try to learn filmmaking back in the years like 2012/13, now I'm in my 20s full time dedicated to film making and after so many years still watching Film Riot❤, and there something in Ryan that inspires me to dream big and create something exciting and amazing! I never thanked Ryan and his team for helping indie filmmakers like us with these creations and man you inspire me a lot! thanks, Ryan, thanks Film riot! bless you ❤ (sorry for the bad English🥴)
@parkerfilmco3 жыл бұрын
I just got the rokinon 35 mm for Christmas and it’s amazing! This was my first lens upgrade and I think I made the right choice. Highly recommend the rokinon cine lens 35 mm.
@efleschner3 жыл бұрын
I use the Rokinons for work and they are work horses for the price. However, they do get soft under T2.8. It’s not terrible, but I tend to avoid the widest T stops for that reason. I think it’s important to mention more of the aspects where the Rokinon won’t perform in order to convey an accurate performance for price. I agree that they are great for what they are, but they are not everything. Thanks for the video!
@davidp1582 жыл бұрын
Soft wide open applies to nearly every lens, to some degree.
@PhilippeOrlando2 жыл бұрын
No audience watching some stupid zombie show on Netflix on a laptop will ever see the difference between these two lenses. Advice: capture the audience with amazing plots, stories and acting and forget about lenses.
@lepidoptera93372 жыл бұрын
That is correct, but here is the rub: the quality of your crew is usually proportional to the quality of your equipment, so your cheap lens zombie will look like a high school theatre production because you don't have a good actor and your makeup person works at the local mall every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday, while the cinematographer with the expensive lens has professionals in front of the camera and in the makeup trailer. That is the real problem.
@FILMSCHOOLCINEMATOGRAPHY2 жыл бұрын
Great overview. Nice to see your video!!!
@g.o.a.t94323 жыл бұрын
I think u can fix the fogging look in Rokinon by adding curves and make it similar to Master Prime. Right?
@balmiralmonte45363 жыл бұрын
its really hard to tell since youtube compressess the video format a lot at the end.. but this video is very helpfull its insane the difference once explained from a trained eye
@Lp-ze1tg2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video. I happened to have one of the lenses (not the expensive one😁). The Rokinon can be used for documentary or wedding production. The expensive one can be rented from local camera stores if getting into more serious production.
@casensitive36952 жыл бұрын
Great vid, long time viewer here- What ever happened to Intercept? It’s 6 years later and If I’m not mistaken we never got word on where it is/why it was scrapped.
@ImaginaryShadows13 жыл бұрын
Your channel is so helpful on everything on filmmaking. I learn so much from channels like film riot than I was in film school. Who needs film school that you have filmmaking KZbin channels.
@duffnolan083 жыл бұрын
I'm curious to see the uncompressed versions of these videos. Even a version with less compression than youtube would be great.
@lanceevans16893 жыл бұрын
Nice job. What you did not mention though is what they look like wide open, compared to stopped down, or what f-stop you shot these tests in. Having used that Rok 35/1.5, I can say that wide open at T1.5 the image is totally useless for normal shooting. The image is so soft that it looks like a fantasy scene. Yet bring it just a half stop down to 2.0, it is suddenly useful, and by 2.8 it is quite crisp. and impressive. I have confirmed than many - but not all - units of this lens behave this way. A few shooters I've spoken with got better units that they have told me are more normally useable wide open. When I tested the Rok, I mostly did it on a M43, and a lot with a speedbooster that resulted in (roughly) a 25mm T/1.1. The resulting image being very nice, even with a budget booster, and especially if I stop that 1.1 down to around 1.5-2.0. The image was still an APS-C, onto a M43. So the furthest corners, with presumably the softest part of the image, were obviously not seen..
@HankOrionYT7 күн бұрын
Ryan been following you guys since I was a kid. Learned a lot from you too. Isnt it time for you guys to make a feature? I’d love to see it!
@High-Tech-Geek3 жыл бұрын
I played along and got the first 4 pairs correct including the exterior shots, but the last 2 studio shot pairs, I got wrong. Interesting that you said the studio shots surprised you too at how well the Rokinon held up!
@Arowrath3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I desperately wanted to try this exact experiment for myself and you guys did it for me!
@YAKUILLASIN3 жыл бұрын
You just keep providing the knowledge, thank you!
@KaceyBakerFilms3 жыл бұрын
Simple fact is if Hollywood used these Rokinons on a film no one would blink an eye lid.
@TheSteveKinney3 жыл бұрын
At 8:00 ... Lens hood anyone?...
@sytesmedia5042 жыл бұрын
Can you do a review on the meike rf cine lenses for Komodo
@UndertakingCinema5 ай бұрын
Clearly the Master Primes were sharper. One advantage with the Rokinon's is that if you're shooting some action piece and you destroy the lens or scratch the front element it's not a big deal. I have (sadly) in the past been at least partially responsible for scratching the front element of a 10mm Panavision lens. If that had been a Rokinon it would not have carried the same weight.
@youngken_lakehousestudio81882 жыл бұрын
Hi Film Riot, please I would like to know your 3 sony lens recommendation and also 3 canon lens for shooting interviews and B rolls. I am a beginner and i find that most of my works are shot on canon or sony cameras.. thanks
@diazfilms3 жыл бұрын
I wonder how the Rokinon Cine DSX lenses would do?
@reddjinn9112 жыл бұрын
I use both of these lenses pretty regularly and can say for sure that the price difference does not equal the difference in performance. Master primes, of course, win in almost every test but to say the rokinons were destroyed is a bit heavy of a review in my opinion. Destroy would be like comparing an arri 35 to a 2005 1080p point-n-shoot in video mode. These lenses are absolutely both useable to tell amazing stories and I am pretty confident that the untrained eye would never notice the difference between two different films shot on these lenses. If you aren't making tech review videos and if you are just telling amazing cinematic stories, the rokinons are just fine. That said I do love this channel and this video was great!
@MrAlifarrukh2 жыл бұрын
How do you fine ziess cp 3 lenses? Are they good jump to cinema lenses?
@JackAdamCarter2 жыл бұрын
For the Exterirors, did you shoot with matte boxes? could the Hazing be reduced with a matt box on the Rokinnon? Great Video!
@mylesnmore2 жыл бұрын
I did my own comparison years ago between the Rokinon and Canon Cine Primes and what I noticed was you are on, say f1.8, you get more depth of field on your interview subject with the background out of focus on a proper cine prime; this is why I could tell on your first shot the focus was very narrow, the man with his part of his forehead was in focus, but on the second shot he was all sharp but with nice bokeh in background - that's a proper cine prime. So say you want your subject more in focus, so on the Rokinon you would stop-up to say f2.8 to f4 well then you bokeh won't be as much. So this is where proper cine primes give you the edge.
@zoetmoments56253 жыл бұрын
What do you think of the IRIX cine (prime) Lens, such as the 21mm 35mm 45mm all T1.5
@knightsinspaceproduction25023 жыл бұрын
I would love to see you working with Hawk Anamorphics. There's an office in LA
@SeanofAllTrades2 жыл бұрын
Is there a Film Riot discord? If so, where could one find a link?
@abhijaygupta72922 жыл бұрын
Was hoping I wouldn't be able to tell the difference, but of course, it was too obvious. The Rokinons seemed to match up well with the Canon Cine lenses in some other videos I found on KZbin, but I realise now those were also based on tests done under controlled environments. Thanks for the insight.
@HikingWithCooper2 жыл бұрын
OT but Id love to see your green screen process. There was a step right at the end of your quick sample that completely sold it.
@elliotj9993 жыл бұрын
Hey Ryan! Just wanted to say how much I appreciate everything you guys do, it's really helped throughout the years. I'm starting my first short film and wanted to know your process for wanting to just go out there and shoot. I feel like having too much gear can get me boged down but at the same time I want to maximize my film to the best possible. The short is a solo production since I don't really have anyone to help out. Are their ways to utilize equipment such as a gimbal (I have the Ronin SC) for shots I'm doing by myself? I was hoping to make an action sort of film but am trying to find the best way possible to incorporate as much movement as I can. Thanks for helping out the filmmaking community, Elliot.
@buckwilde15113 жыл бұрын
That Rokinon looks GREAT! I like the warmer look better ... but that's just my personal preference. On KZbin, they're both very close. I can't imagine anyone saying the $25,500 price difference is "worth it" (but most people are gonna just rent the MP anyway ... whereas you could OWN the Rokinon.)
@00SPDI3 жыл бұрын
i wanted to see this with Gmasters
@projectfreedom95102 жыл бұрын
3:00 before we actually get to the point.
@Scripture-Man2 жыл бұрын
Wow. Amazing video, and VERY encouraging for filmmakers starting out on a tight budget (like me)! Thanks, Ryan! :-)
@vzbeatz17063 жыл бұрын
WHEN COMPARING PRICES AND SOMEONE WHO KNOWS WHAT THEY'RE DOING I BELIEVE THE ROKINON STACKS SHOOTING IN RAW.. GOOD CONTENT IS GOOD CONTENT
@ajaykumartargotra27682 жыл бұрын
Hi there, I have rokinon 35mm micro lens I got blackmagic 6k pro, but mft lens is not fitting on it,,,can you please guide,,which adapter I can use!
@LaLa-vr1cr Жыл бұрын
You have to sell your MFT lens and get a Rokinon EF mount
@dreamsandrealms4581 Жыл бұрын
Rokinon/samyang lenses are great despite couple flaws mentioned here. It fully depends on environment condition does these flaws come up in image. Generally I would say you "focus on strengths, not weaknesses", and color grading end results is one the strentghs you can use in this kind of scenarios. (ofc those stripes on bokeh balls can be distracting, but there is ways to get around them by ediiting and focusing=dont use static image with bokeh long duration to draw attention of viewer/pixel beepers :) )
@connornyhan3 жыл бұрын
Hey Ryan! Did you ever test out the Sirui Anamorphic lenses, especially with the newer Sirui Mara set out? I know you guys had a pocket 4k which would be great with them. Additionally, thoughts on the Atlas Orion Anamorphic’s?
@rw34522 жыл бұрын
Was the rokinon the mark 1 or 2?
@rtfinklea2 жыл бұрын
Curious about a Xeen line comparison. Still 80 - 90% less expensive.
@Heezri3 жыл бұрын
Did you use UC filter in both lens?
@Zvezda13663 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video!!
@eliapavoni22752 жыл бұрын
Are Rokinon cine DS the same as Samyang vdlsrmk2?
@new.asteroid.tracker3 жыл бұрын
Sorry but I think I may have missed this but were both lens tested on the same camera? I only ask this because there is a list of 4 cameras. If each lens test was not tested on the same camera, how can you compare what would be 'apples to oranges'. I have to think that the different camera chips plays a big part in image quality.
@matthewmoore67563 жыл бұрын
Was this the cine, ds or dsx versions?
@cooleymovies3 жыл бұрын
Have you guys used the dzo film lenses?
@royjf103 жыл бұрын
0:18 LensProToGo plug with Lensrentals case prominently in the background ,😂 I'm not hating, I just find it amusing
@filmriot3 жыл бұрын
Lens Rentals owns Lens Pro now, so often you will get the gear from Lens Rentals. But it's the same company and both are great! :)
@jesseyules2 жыл бұрын
Most of ultra-high end film equipment is expensive because it's not mass produced. There might be a few hundred ARRI LTs out in the wild. Some cinema lenses only had a few dozen units produced.
@MallettMotion3 жыл бұрын
Hey great video! That helped a lot! Now for a question, is it possible for you guys to look into doing an effect for shooting an arrow into somebody? We are gonna be doing a pretty big short film in the summer with this effect, and we don't know how to do it, especially since it'll probably be handheld and showing the arrow penetrating him full on. (were not trying to glorify violence) I also think we won't be using AE, most likely Hitfilm express. So if you guys did that, that would be extremely helpful! Thanks for the great content!
@HitfilmUniversity3 жыл бұрын
Hi! FXhome Ambassador here! Note that in stock Express you'd be using a 2D image of an arrow, which has multiple limitations. Consider looking at the 3D model pack add on, or start learning Blender to set up a render you can export from Blender to import to Hitfilm. If you go the "Hitfilm 3D model" add on route, then this tutorial will help. It's for Hitfilm 2, so the interface is quite different from current versions of Hitfilm, but the techniques are the same. kzbin.info/www/bejne/iGLaf6SpgK6IbKM You'll want to look at Hitfilm Masking tutorials as well. You'll need to mask/roto to make an arrow appear to be stuck into a body. Hitfilm's masks have changed over the years with HF 15 being the last update. Given a choice, stick with masking/roto tutorials made in the last 2 or 2 years to avoid learning too many things that got changed.
@kevin_wright3 жыл бұрын
Show me one place this lenses sells for $200. Come on, guys.
@filmriot3 жыл бұрын
You are 100% right. We were looking at used options when planning the episode, which is confusing since we didn't mention here. We've corrected the thumbnail and title and will make a note in the description and next week's ep. Thanks for pointing this out!
@storybart3 жыл бұрын
The most valuable lesson I took from this is that a great image does not come from the choice of lens. The scene, the lighting, the angle, the colors and contrast in the shot are all such an important aspect. I bet those test shots even look awesome if you'd shoot it on a webcam. I bought the Rokinon set a year ago and I absolutely love them. I still struggle to get the full potential out of them, but I'm enjoying the learning process. Thanks again for such an interesting topic an a great entertaining way of teaching us everything that goes into film making!
@danielchacin2 жыл бұрын
Hello great video, there will always be differences between lenses even if they are of the same price, each brand has good and bad things. It's super obvious that in this case the other one is better, Rokinon or Samyang have a new DSX version that corrects a lot of these problems, above all the contrast ones, try to get one to test them, I'm quite happy with the results for the price I pay
@liamburge4633 жыл бұрын
I'm genuinely impressed...with the rokinon that is...lol
@greyareaRK13 жыл бұрын
The outdoor differences are obvious, but I honestly thought the Prime under controlled lighting looked a little flat.
@thogan3 жыл бұрын
You should do this comparison to Canon L lenses instead of Rokinon lenses.
@DipaceGiri2 ай бұрын
Unless I am shooting a 500million $ Movie i will always go for Rokinon .
@ClintByrne2 жыл бұрын
Great comparison.pixel peepers will care but the majority won't. Also this is why vintage and uncoated lenses have gotten so popular because having a look is nice and master primes are beautiful but also very clean.
@sobanzaki3 жыл бұрын
REALISTIC SUPER PUNCH TUTORIAL !!!
@KrunoslavStifter2 жыл бұрын
I agree with most of the things said in the video. I would simply remind all of us, that if there is a good story with good characters and good composition, few, if anyone, will care. And we have seen, in recent decades, the budget of movies and technological advances in gear and VFX go through the roof while proportionally good stories and characters and good composition go down the toilet. In the end, we forgot that the camera and lens are recording tools. If we have a boring mind, it will record that. If we have an interesting mind and an interesting story, it will record that.
@PARISONFIRE Жыл бұрын
honestly, if your work isnt good and i mean story, cinematography, the talent and edits and whatnot, buying highend glass wont make a single difference at all. its as simple as that
@MoonDoggie823 жыл бұрын
I just want to know where you're getting that Rokinon lens for $200 because the cheapest I've found it was $500. Also the differences (at least on KZbin with compression) with color and what not are not noticable. They looked exactly the same so unless you have a theatrical release there is no need to spend 26k on a lens or even rent one.
@chandlerryd67502 жыл бұрын
They're great little lenses for the money. My biggest issue is that they generally get soft wider than around 2.8 or so, and outdoors they're really annoying with the purple fringing and the washed-out look. I've had issues matching a Rokinon outdoors with other sharper lenses, like the Sigma line.
@douds56172 жыл бұрын
you need to add an IR filter. black magic cameras dont have IR filter on the sensor like panasonic ones
@makestuffmike3 жыл бұрын
I’d be interested to see a comparison with something like the sigma 35mm 1.4.
@ontonio2 жыл бұрын
Why did I do Optimus Prime's voice when you said, "Master Prime"...lol
@adventuresinAI19823 жыл бұрын
Cool video. It might matter more in the theater, but for modern streaming as your output, I don't think the difference between the two sets of lenses would change my enjoyment of anything as a viewer.
@threethroneproductions5498 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video and that been written, i am buying the Rokinon 35mm.
@PrettyWeddingStudios6 ай бұрын
Thanks for the great review & tbh I believe truly is the best way to rate products. Filmmaking is an artform and one does not analyse chart and scientific tests to measure art. Case and point I literally guessed the opposite in every A->B, because I was deciding which sample gave me the cine magic & in conclusion, for me it would seem that the cheaper lens is the type of glass I would use to film a movie with. Now, that is awesome both because irrespective of how great a lens is on paper or it's price I know which one I would take & yes it helps that it's soooooooooooo much cheaper. Win, Win!!:)).
@vojtekvojtek3599 Жыл бұрын
Hello, there are already film lenses for 500 euros. Can you tell me if they are better for photography as well as film? If so, what are they better at? I want to buy it, but I don't know if it's worth it. Well thank you!
@juept13 жыл бұрын
James Cameron said something along the lines of "The lens you choose is about the memory you would have if you were there." and that gave me a really cool perspective on choosing different lens!
@LIVETVISION Жыл бұрын
CAM A FOCUSES ON THE CORNER OF GLASSES AND CAM B ON CENTER OF NOSE.
@EricSwain793 жыл бұрын
I swear I am doing something wrong, I own a BMPCC 6k Pro and URSA G2 and can't get the skin tones to look this good. PLEASE! Do a tutorial on your grading workflow. You seem to pull out the best results of both of these cameras. There are many Pocket users following this channel that I am sure would love to see how you ETTR or ETTL, what ISO you find the cleanest to grade and if you are using a LUT to start or grading from scratch.