Fiona Harvey's Lawyer Demands Evidence From Richard Gadd in £135m Netflix Lawsuit

[@jenelphaba7558]

But Gadd never said it was her. She assumes it is her.

[@RitchieRosson]

But he said everytjhing else and then linked to her via social media messages she had said and he made her scottish and look like her etc.

[@mangersavoir4213]

It doesn't even look like her. People are nuts. ​@RitchieRosson

[@missymani]

​@@RitchieRossonFiona herself literally said it is not her, not based on her, the actress looks nothing like her, etc...until she saw she could get money from it 🤡🤡🤡

[@patrick3178]

4:33 "The reason why she came out is because she is shattered." "This is not true, please. I need to respect my privacy," But as soon as Piers said he has the real Martha on uncensored, she was on facebook every second every day posting about it. She wrote who is going to watch me on Piers show etc that is a far cry of please leave me alone and a shattered woman.

[@whadis404]

I don’t believe for a minute that “she’s afraid for her life every day” BS!!!

[@dominikmuller5021]

Have you read the comments on any of these videos. People do believe she's a criminal and all around horrible person. Some messages she received are in the law suit. It's not funny at all.

[@kazabushy]

Where is her high flying intelligent boyfriend??

[@whadis404]

@@kazabushy exactly!!

[@lindarenaud2907]

@@dominikmuller5021 No certainly not funny. What is funny is that she is on the receiving side of these messages when she sent so many herself to other people, many times menancing.Karma.

[@firstnamelastname5612]

@@kazabushy you are still convinced that baby reindeer, the show/play that gadd has altered several times over the years is a documentary. You sound like a council estate single mum who jumps on every bandwagon.

[@nowsheenanwar291]

The show said it was true but Richard did say that people shohld not to go out of their way to find out who the people are Who told her to go and have an interview with piers in the first place She went out of her own free will I have seen the show, I never had thought of fiona Harvey, I only knew of this name after the interview Doing this case alone is technically still stalking as well They better have 4400 emails, they better have all these voicemails, seriously !!!!

[@katiefletcher2709]

Can they please have another episode with all of this extra drama?

[@olajumokeejibunu4260]

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@KatsFurBabys]

She doesn't have a case and shame on the horrible lawyers trying to prove her innocent! They need to prove how the show has affected her money to start with, how it's affected her working life.. she didn't have a job she could keep.. so she's not entitled to money in that sense. The case is a joke and shows how. Bloodthirsty and unethical US lawyers are.. anything for money they don't care about the truth A decent law firm would look at this case properly and say, no way.. there's nothing here... She outed herself, a history of abusing politicians and people.. in one day had over 30 Facebook statuses abusing various people.. 1day!! !so yes its believable she sent 40,000, that's one example how shes destroyed her case 😅😅already did so much damage doing all those interviews that will be used against her. Her Facebook alone is shows how abusive she is, she deleted them but people have them screenshoted. Why didnt she go after him when did the 1man show for 4yrs She's a bully, not a lawyer never was, got a diploma in law, 😅 that's like a 2yrs done.. to become a professional lawyer, she needs to finish her degree, then masters, while working as an intern in a law office for around 2yrs, then theres the bar exams that cost a fortune to do.. the women had 2yrs of around 8yrs to call herself a lawyer! She's a lier and no right giving herself that title for completing a level 5 diploma.. few years to get to that level 9, or PhD level 10.. think it's well established She's a lier.. this lawyer is a hound defending a money hungry hound

[@pmd1933]

That woman needs to go away. She needs to prove she is the person the story is about her.

[@paddyj7690]

I keep saying that. Her saying she never did any of it is not helping her case. She first has to prove Martha is based on her. Also, if Gadd just doesn't produce any evidence, then the case is over, as it's clearly not Harvey they're portraying.

[@eli1985]

Even if only half of this story is true, she deserves: nothing! She is dangerous, she could ruin other people's life over and over again. She outed herself and is enjoys her "fame". Now she knows how it feels to be stalked and having to hide away in your own house. Roth, the ultimate American "ambulance chaser".

[@whadis404]

Absolutely true She’s been told to hide away She has to prove this has affected her badly She was going to do an appearance before she was told to hide The newspaper TOLD her she had death threats .. she said that in the Piers Morgan interview

[@wenwatkins3216]

This lawsuit could be seen as another way to continue stalking and harassing Richard Gadd?

[@LaPetiteBoulin]

I think that is exactly what she is doing.

[@castlerock58]

Only halfwits would see it that way if they lied about her.

[@JoeOsi1372]

And money Making 😂😂😂😂

[@jamescontactyelena]

Well, good for her

[@Jericho642]

Go watch the final credits; it CLEARLY says some parts of the story were changed.

[@castlerock58]

That is irrelevant. They said it was a true story and gave sworn testimony that it was true before parliament. That is contempt of parliament.

[@RitchieRosson]

Why say that at the end?! But it's true at the beginning.

[@kazabushy]

​@@RitchieRosson Isn't the Donny character typing "This is a true story?" "Typing" this character's story. His story?? Him typing was part of the story!!

[@fashunpuss6279]

Wrong place to put it

[@kazabushy]

@@fashunpuss6279 I guess you've never watched movies or tv series that put credits at the end.

[@vinniechan]

What evidence? The show never pointed to anyone specific

[@ezachbellingham9867]

At first I laughed when I learned the real martha was about to sue Netflix and gadd over baby reindeer but then I read articles stating that she actually might have a case bc Netflix presented the show as a "true story" when they should've said it's just "based" on true events. Anyway If that woman actually wins the case it would literally cause so much hurt and a lot of SA victims will be scared to come forward from now on

[@OneEyedmm]

The opening that says “this is a true story” is the character, donny, typing. It’s the character’s true story that he writes in the final episode. The credits make clear it’s based on a true story, but names and events have been changed. Everyone is mixing up a plot device for a separate statement of fact.

[@OneEyedmm]

Also, her main argument is regarding claims of her having a criminal record. I’m pretty sure she has had a court determine she behaved criminally… there are several accounts now of her being treated at a mental health institution, which sounds like a court ordered deal. Fiona doesn’t seem like she’d do that of her own volition. And those kinds of things can be reported differently than standard “criminal conviction and jail” we think of regarding crime.

[@beckscald3855]

Netflix should have put the disclaimer at the beginning rather than the end. The problem is she outed herself and only rumours circulated. However, they used her likeness, accent etc. On the basis of they didn't hide the identity enough. On that basis she could win.

[@irisdanagher]

The definition of true story is to mean much of the actual story and events remain intact in the script. The writer may make significant adaptations (creating composite characters, truncating or shifting the timeline, changing names, locations, ages, gender, etc.) but the core of the story remains the same.

[@paddyj7690]

Correct.

[@pagliacci2942]

Is that not the definition of "based on a true story"?

[@paddyj7690]

@@pagliacci2942 I'd say so. Which the show was

[@pagliacci2942]

@@paddyj7690 But, crucially it DIDN'T say "based on" a true story.

[@paddyj7690]

@@pagliacci2942 It does though. It says it's a story based on true events and certain characters or events may have been fictionalized for dramatic purposes. It's not that hard to find it, and anybody watching the show has seen it.

[@Littlewings1211]

"We dispute everything about the show...." 2 minutes earlier: "I can spend 2 seconds on Google, put in the language used in the show - things like 'hanging curtains', the term 'Baby Reindeer' - and it will come up with Fiona Harvey." So you're disputing everything about the show but some of it you can actually prove independently was 100% true?

[@TheCarlScharnberg]

No. He's disputing what can be seen as defamatory. Not that she actually was in contact with him.

[@j.andres7094]

This guy would say anything for a cut of the 170 Mio.

[@HellORhighwaters]

She should make her own movie of her side of the story? Might sell

[@saharapanda]

Thought the same! Amazon prime maybe?

[@imbookedandverybusyhoney]

It will be full of banter 😂😂😂

[@whadis404]

She’s definitely a stalker just No a convicted one … yet! I wish Laura Wray would have pressed charges

[@pasja1987]

I understand that it's based on true story. I Don't understand why she showed herself. I see it like only game form her side.

[@kazabushy]

How pathetic!! Roth will have to prove Fiona is the real Martha character. Once it is established she is, only then can they take issue with the conviction revealed at the end of the story!

[@jenniferbaebler6946]

I am sorry but weather she did this or not i can't believe Netflix made this without talking to her ...

[@jessicathomas73]

It's not a documentary, it is a drama series.

[@jonathanstone..]

One email less of e-mail or a minute less in voice messages her laser thinks she didn't do anything. Lots of stalkers don't get prosecuted but should, so don't know if the person who said she was misinformed or clipped

[@PatriciaLane-x2p]

She also said if Fiona wins millions I will sue her !

[@Jericho642]

Every thing she has done since the show came out simply proves that she has some mental challenges. She has done nothing to dispel any of the story

[@RitchieRosson]

So much doesn't add up. I think more questions need to be asked of Gadd.

[@deadeyes4626]

Money hungry🧠🪦🔔🔚

[@pamelawingard7275]

Dam she is in fear of her life what about the people she was stocking and the threatening messages she left them Wow

[@teganbigone2366]

There is no one named Fiona Harvey in the entire series.

[@rowanchisholm1603]

I might be being dumb here but how can a US layer in a US caught over see a legal case between 2 British Citizens who live in the UK. Particularly when the alleged chrimes were committed in the UK

[@gillianlillis1984]

Chrimes 😂

[@Melon-by5bs]

Because Netflix is an American company based in the US. The lawyer is not suing a British Citizen, they are suing Netflix. The mention of Gadd in the title is saying they want him to give evidence. He's not the defendant in the case.

[@adamcraig1468]

Netflix HQ is in america

[@judithmorganjudyteen]

Netflix is American

[@phoenixkali]

The British lawyers would laugh her out the office!

[@imbookedandverybusyhoney]

If Fionna is claiming none of the series is true about her, then how is she suing? Fionna claims she never seen the series and SHE named herself 😂 I guess the series is about me and now i can sue Netflix 🤔

[@mangersavoir4213]

Be careful what you wish for, Mr. Lawyer. Lol

[@PatriciaLane-x2p]

Na! She’s no chance only a greedy American would risk their reputation on Fiona Harvey 😂

[@siobhanmclaughlin1887]

Pierce five off! It is a true story... didn't anyone see him writing at the end..this is a true story. His true story?

[@SW-oq8ip]

Fiona stays by her statement made on Piers Morgan - those statements changing during all the interview? Which version of them?

[@siobhanmclaughlin1887]

Pierce took her out.

[@EC-tt3nj]

Bet they regret it now 😂

[@OneEyedmm]

“This is a true story” was typed at the beginning of the show. Cause it was DONNY’S true story. He typed out everything at the end. And the show ends with “Based on a true story, tho some characters and events have been changed for tv” type disclaimer… cause thats RICHARD’S story told via dramatization. No case. And Fiona clearly has a severe mental health issues that make her a danger to others, but leave the woman alone. Don’t replicate her bad behavior back to her. That solves nothing, and makes you no better than her.

[@march212008west]

She wanted attention…. And gadd’s lawyer has tons of emails to prove she really did these things!!!!

[@YousufIGhouri]

£135 not bad

[@edinorogovna]

Fiona scares me. Sent from my Xiaomi

[@secreteobsession3584]

Then green book true events and true stories of movies need to be sued then as they added men dating men where there no info stating that and portraying that he was Into men. Brave heart events weren't true

[@kirangera4072]

Creepy lawyer defending creepy cluent

[@ohenhen4844]

I hope she gets 130 million from Netflix, She can use some of it for therapy. She has an obsessive personality. i know people like that. Not dangerous, just mis understood. She is not a stalker. Just annoying.

[@siobhanmclaughlin1887]

Why you so interested Piece?

[@MohammedMagdi-yh3kr]

الوقوف إلى جانب البطاطس شي جيد ربما أقف جانب النخيل لوقت كبير