90 FOR SURE!

[@ferrohazard]

I like how the control warrior mirror match started at turn 6 with Justicar.

[@BenimanPlaysGames]

Ferrohazard turn 5

[@saulosilva1236]

cheating

[@Zanfire11]

Just when you think missing the acolyte swap was bad enough, the opponent had to play his Yogg. Duel of legends.

[@edwardmarshall2035]

Aww yes the control warrior mirror match....riveting.

[@lucasrozendaal750]

Edward Marshall Welcome to the Grand...ResidentSleeper

[@stevenklnes7148]

While certainly not super exciting on a turn by turn basis, knowing that you're playing to fatigue requires a lot of strategy. Having all your combo pieces before you've gone through half your deck makes it a bit easier.

[@edwardmarshall2035]

Steven Kølnes A lot of strategy? Pretty sure it boils down to "How can I draw less cards than my opponent?". I guess it's relative. Still my point was watching 2 players hero power/pass for 15 turns isn't my idea of entertainment. Was cool to see firebat nail the damage calculation at the end, besides that and the misplays, it was a snooze fest.

[@stevenklnes7148]

I never said it was exciting but knowing what you have, what you still need, and what you need to play to keep from losing an important piece all while assuming what an opponent may have and how they will react to your play requires forethought and strategy. Like feeding your opponent pieces in chess to get them to put themselves in a situation that advantages you. Too many people would rush in to try and end the game so you need to know when to commit, when to use removal, and when to cast that goddamn Acolyte of Pain! Sorry about that last one, that was a cringe worthy misplay.

[@edwardmarshall2035]

Steven Kølnes All fair points, but at the same time I never said it didn't take strategy. I think at that rank and as much as firebat plays he could probably pull his opponents decklist out of memory. The only thing that seemed to take him by surprise was geddon and maybe Harrison. Firebat is not like many people, and I don't even think many people who play control would rush in to end the game quickly. That's just not the win condition in control v control matchups or most control games. Yeah, the acolyte misplay was huge. Getting rid of a dead card and accelerating your opponent into fatigue is pretty huge, luckily it was irrelevant this time.

[@FeamT]

Riveting Gameplay! Can't wait to see this match-up at Blizzcon.

[@flyingmobias]

Hahah. But I'm not sure a deck like Firebat's would be used, there's a tourny meta, no idea what it is atm, or how common/strong mill decks are anywhere

[@cameronsprague101]

Feam T yeah, because yogg randomly winning the game was so much more exciting.

[@gt31m]

You definitely dont play justicar there. Let the remaining ambushes get burned, delay fatigue and fewer minions to deal with in the long run. When they get burned, you don't draw the additional card like normal, so you basically add 2 cards to your deck.

[@3snoW_]

The formula is: Total fatigue damage = (2f+n-1)*n/2 Where f is the fatigue damage he'll be taking on the first draw and n is the number of cards he draws.

[@ainoakeisari]

Or just N*(N+2*Y+1)/2 where N = cards he will draw and Y = cards he has drawn.

[@expertb6348]

I am too dumb to understand any of this shit

[@Dinazzino]

Or just N+N+1+N+2+N+3+N+4+N+....

[@stev019]

Take any comp sci or math course at university level. This is pretty simple shit.

[@Jedislayer19]

"Take any comp sci or math course..." No.

[@GLaDtoHavApples]

Been subscribed for a bit now, and my favorite video by far! This just felt so intense, the clench was real.

[@aragorn1398]

7:15 Got me so hard, nice editing Firebat :]

[@theBlackBullz]

He doesn't edit his videos...

[@miladziewczyna5]

Yes he does

[@caybell]

miladziewczyna5 no he does not

[@deinernst1233]

miladzie or however i write this fucking name, a guy called mike makes the editing for him and some other streamers and gets ofc paid for it

[@SmartThis]

yes he does

[@thefance4708]

The math relevant to fatigue dmg is "the Triangular Series". It's like the series of Perfect Squares, except the squares are triangles. I.e. the nth number of the series corresponds to "the total number of dots in an equilateral triangle, where: the length of its sides is n". E.g. a triangle with length (3) contains (6) dots - and coincidentally the 3rd Triangular Number is (6). O O O O O O The first twenty numbers are 0, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45, 55, 66, 78, 91, 105, 120, 136, 153, 171, 190, (etc) Like how we associate gravity with Issac Newton, mathematicians associate the Triangular Series with a dead German mathematician named Carl Gauss (arguably the greatest of all time). It's fabled that he invented a shortcut, which may resemble the formulas others have posted. The formula stacks the triangle on top of itself to form a rectangle, finds the area of the rectangle, then divides it in half. E.g. for (n := 3), the rectangle has a length of (3) and a width of (3 + 1). So the formula is (1/2) (3) (3 + 1), which reduces to (6). Therefore, the 3rd Triangular Number should be (6). O + + + O O + + O O O + T(n) = (1/2) (L) (W) = (1/2) (n) (n + 1) = (1/2) (n^2 + n) T(3) = (1/2) (3) (3 + 1) = (1/2) (9 + 3) = (6) The dmg generated by any given Mill Combo M(d, f) equals T(d + f + 1) - T(f), where: (f) is the turns of fatigue he's taken before the combo; and (d) is the card draw that the murlocs generate. E.g. Brann and two Murlocs generate (8) card draw, so (d := 8). You waited until the opponent had already taken (5) turns of fatigue, so (f := 5). The (+ 1) represents the opponent's extra tick of fatigue after you End Turn. T(f) represents the fatigue damage the opponent has taken before the combo. M(d, f) = T(d + f + 1) - T(f) M(8, 5) = T(8 + 5 + 1) - T(5) = T(14) - T(5) = 14 + 13 + (...) + 7 + 6 = (105) - (15) = (90) If you'd rather memorize a single clean formula rather than two formulas, we can expand T(d + f + 1) and T(f) then reduce M(d, f) to get (1/2) (d^2 + 3 d) + (f) (d + 1) + (1). For the sake of brevity, the derivation will be left as an exercise to the reader. M(d, f) = (1/2) (d^2 + 3 d) + (f) (d + 1) + (1) Sanity Check: M(8, 5) = (1/2) (8^2 + 3 * 8) + (5) (8 + 1) + (1) = (44) + (45) + (1) = (90) From this, we see that (d) scales polynomially while (f) scales linearly. This means that the dmg from the Murloc's card draw far exceeds the normal fatigue dmg taken from just sitting on the combo for an extra turn. Shield Block or Acolyte wouldn't have influenced the game one way or the other. Since the Exodia Combo E(f) probably won't change, we can assume that (d) remains constant at (8). E(f) = M(8, f) = (44) + (f) (9) + (1) = (45) + (9 f) = (9) (5 + f) So for this specific combo, the rule is "multiply fatigue by 9, then add 45". Or alternatively, "add 5 to fatigue, then multiply by 9".

[@Dragonstar_aoe]

12:28 That Face Firebat made when he trusted in Twitch Chat and they were correct xD

[@JustanamebroDK]

6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14= 90.... Mathbat plz

[@rawovunlapin8201]

Had to check the numbers to be sure. It's 90 for sure.

[@bobertbojo2]

(9 * (9+1) / 2) + 9n

[@morthim]

min+max (/2) then multiply by the number of numbers in the set. and you get the sum. 6+14 = 20; /2 = 10; *9 = 90. this vector math only works for linear sets though. that is.... just sum math.

[@armin3582]

it's actually pretty easy, just add 6 + 14, 7 + 13, 8 +12, 9 + 11, + 10

[@PlainPlaneOfficial]

(2*6+9-1)/2*9=90. Git gud at the sum of arithmetic progression formula scrub.

[@everyvillainislemons9759]

Love how everyone in this comment section thinks they're a math wizard, although my daughter could do the math lol. and i don't have a daughter. or a wife. or a life? fuck

[@daredevilace]

your imaginary daughter is better at maths than the first hearthstone world champion!

[@everyvillainislemons9759]

Asa Mendel If this is your way of saying the math was actually difficult, then I feel bad for you son -- I've got 99 problems, but this simple math aint one

[@daredevilace]

EveryVillainIsLemons Indeed not, I was saying that the HS WC is shit at maths. Long live hearthstone!

[@everyvillainislemons9759]

Asa Mendel Ahh, sorry for jumping to conclusions! I've always said the in-game portion of HS is 90% luck, 10% skill -- so it wouldn't surprise me if the WC was bad a math XD... to be fair to him though, he was more into entertaining twitch chat than playing the game

[@9BA9]

firebat play chronicle runescape legends i love you

[@patrickwienhoft7987]

It hurt when you said factorial. (Btw 9 factorial is 362880)

[@rhyzvanic3660]

That's a hell of a lot of fatigue damage.

[@sagi2dozetas]

Patrick Wienhöft nah man I think it's 90 for sure

[@sarm2005]

Vlad1m4ra

[@sieg624]

There is a thing called an Arithmetic sequence that would help. ------> Sum of values = ( 0.5xN ) x [ 2A + ( N - 1 )D ]

[@hermeticascetic]

It's amazing how well these clips age.

[@Chetkara]

Yo, I made a JavaScript "program" to calculate the cards needed to kill your opponent, so you don't have to bother with maths. Just open Chrome (or any browser) and press F12, go to console and paste this: function calculateDraws(currHP, currFatigue) { var hp = currHP; var damage = currFatigue; var drawCount = 0; while (hp > 0) { hp -= damage; damage++; drawCount++; } console.log(drawCount); } calculateDraws(90, 6); Just make sure to replace the numbers in the brackets in the last row, the first number is your opponent's current HP and the second one is his current Fatigue, considering he is already at that point. I can make another where you can input the current card count in his deck if you want.

[@Nikthewriter]

he shouldnt have to play Justicar becouse in that case he burning 2 ambushs, so minus 2 4/4 and plus 2 turns without fatigue

[@dragan4324]

Love the editing around 7:18 misplay.

[@Zack0]

How does this deck match up against classes that dont sit around waiting for death?

[@BastianAndersenxD]

The easy calculation is the fatique damage of the fifth card multiplied by 9. You're welcome.

[@leobastian_]

Or just The fact that The Combo damage increases by 8 each Turn,because 1-9 2-10 usw.

[@ConSolo29]

@@leobastian_ the term for usw. in english is etc

[@leobastian_]

Oh,my fault. Never use german keyboards to write english

[@ConSolo29]

@@leobastian_ it's all good lol, just thought you might not have known

[@ZergrushEddie]

I love this deck. When I first saw in a Trolden video, I was so damn happy that it existed.

[@switchingtime]

The opponent made some misplays here and there but the moment he dropped Yogg I couldn't wait for you to wreck him, Bat. He deserves every terrible thing that happens if he drops Yogg at that point.

[@RickyMuzakki]

Indeed, but giving him acolyte would be much better for him lel

[@barsknos]

Hi Firebat. Here is the formula: Current fatigue = F. Cards to draw = D: (F + (F+D-1)) * D/2. Which can be written as (2F+D-1)*D/2. In your case: (2*6+9-1) * 9/2 --> 20*4.5 = 90.

[@ainoakeisari]

Damn I just played a match with a variant of this deck and I was facing C'Thun Warrior, and we were both deep in to fatigue, he just took 6 damage from fatique last turn and he had 99 health in total, so I had exact lethal with the combo! FeelsGoodMan! (although i had a FieryWinAxe equipped for + 3 damage)

[@mikoopauftry]

That was amazing man ! Nice job :Dkeep the good work !

[@gabrielzaccaro]

guys, a easy way to do this math: he draw 9 cards; fatigue increase 1 damage for draw; 1st draw + 9st draw = 5st draw (x2), 2st draw + 8st draw = 5st draw (x2) ... so the damage is 5st draw (x9)

[@gabrielzaccaro]

sorry for bad english

[@daredevilace]

13:28 firebat pronounces "game" funny. hilarious.

[@youngthinker1]

I guess you are talking about the fatigue combo: so you force the opponent to draw 5 cards, while fatiguing. So that means x, x+1, x+2, x+3, x+4. So we sum that up: 5x+10. So you will do a decent amount of damage.

[@youngthinker1]

Ah, I see, you have brand. That means 9 cards drawn in fatigue. Which means 8x + (.5*8^2 + .5*8) = 8x+36. So you just need to know what the first fatigue damage is and there you go: 8x+36.

[@youngthinker1]

He took 8*6 + 36 = 48+36 = 84 damage

[@alexieishere]

1. Define starting value (x) = e.g in this game: x = 6 2. Define how many card draw (z) = e.g in this game: z = 9 3. Define ending value (y) = e.g in this game: y = 14 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. Add the starting and ending value and divide it by 2= (x+y)/2 = (6+14)/2 = 20/2 = 10 5. Multiply that number with z = 10 * 9 = 90 p.s: if z is an even number, then x+y will always be odd, to make it easier, you don't need to divide x+y with 2 (because of the .5 thingy), just multiply x+y with z/2 for easier calculation

[@winfredwang1878]

nice edits!! keep it up!! :D

[@longyinlai3021]

How well would two violet illusionists work? On for fools bane and one for fatigue combo

[@HDuser100]

Nothing stops you from trying it out. Although it would reveal your "secret" weapon, which is never good.

[@HDuser100]

Liam Phillips Well, let's just say that you are favored in a control warrior vs control warrior matchup, that's all :D

[@fulmetalotaku3091]

So the formula for that combo is actually really easy, it's 45 plus an additional 9 for each additional turn they are in fatigue (if they are at 6 fatigue damage, 9*5=45 +45=90

[@jeolf8909]

If the justicar wouldnt have been played, the 2 remaining nerubians would have buffered fatigue for another two rounds.

[@SniP3RxSTyLe]

I feel like I've watched this video before. Is this a reupload?

[@SniP3RxSTyLe]

Oh I just remembered. It was on Reddit.

[@kaspisw]

It was in a Trolden video from the other guys perspective. His reaction was pretty hilarious. Edit: nvm it was a different match but the same thing Trolden ep 184 1st game.

[@Freaky__T-ttv]

when school math acctually applies to real world usage

[@brawnyprawn]

Hey dude, you do great work and I love your style of play and commentary. I have been trying to catch your stream live with no success, when do you normally stream and when do you think your next stream will be?

[@tywinlannister8015]

This is not the Twitch Chat you are looking for.

[@keithdavid194]

fyi the fatigue formula is N(1+N)/2 N= number of cards he draws

[@keithdavid194]

that is if you start from 1 damage in if you start from 5 for a random example just change the (1+N) part to (5+(N+5))

[@Celrador]

Just calculate the sum of the amount of cards drawn and then add the amount of cards times the already taken fatigue to the sum. i.e. 9 draws, opponent already took 5 fatigue at the last draw 9 draws = 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 = (1+9)+(2+8)+(3+7)+(4+6)+5 = 45 Alternatively: (9*(9+1))/2 = 45 [According to (n(n+1))/2] Now we just need to adjust for the already taken fatigue damage: 5*9+45 = 90 Or in short: (f*n)+((n(n+1))/2) = Damage (f = last fatigue damage taken; n = the number of draws) The most difficult part is getting the sum of the fatigue damage for the amount of card draws, to be honest. (And for that, one should get along pretty nicely in Hearthstone with just remembering the triangular numbers up to 10.)

[@prasanna2991]

45 + (9*F): F is the fatigue damage taken last turn

[@Celrador]

Prasanna Muthuraman Yes, but the 9 and the 45 depend on the card draws you can force, which in this case would be 9, so I tried to turn it into a generalized formula.

[@prasanna2991]

Yes. The general formula for the sum of an arithmetic progression can be applied here too.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_progression My point is: The purpose of this deck against other control decks is typically to go into fatigue, and burst them with this 9 fatigue combo. My simple formula works for this specific case.

[@underpressure07140]

Calculating fatigue damage simply requires knowledge of arithmetic progression.

[@me_hanics]

9!=1*2*3*...*9 You mean 1+2+3+...+9

[@PattyManatty]

also known as the 9th triangular number

[@daredevilace]

9 factorial = 9 times 8 times 7 etc....

[@daredevilace]

Aware of the fact that fatigue does not count as a factorial btw :)

[@DenHead]

It's an arithmetic series.

[@Reza-hq6bq]

Firebat, are you coming to Indonesia for 8th ie-sf international e sports championship?

[@ArbiterDan]

factorial? no way Jose.

[@xdragon2k]

I ran the number with spreadsheet, these are the "last fatigue" and "resulting next 9 card draws fatigue damage": 1 = 54 2 = 63 3 = 72 4 = 81 5 = 90 6 = 99 7 = 108 8 = 117 9 = 126 10 = 135

[@eiknaurjensen7927]

So I think the easiest way to calculate that shit is to pre-emptively calculate the amount of damage he'll take from your full combo if he has taken no fatigue damage prior (45 in this case) and add the last amount of damage he took times the amount of cards you fatigue. So in this case (with F = last fatigue) 45 + 9 x F That isn't too bad right?

[@hector-m-carrillo]

Just finished leper gnome otk and that reminded me of this video Decided to derive the fatigue formula, seems others have already, but it was a nice 8 minute distraction [d(2n+d+1)]/2 d = cards he's going to draw n= last fatigue damage he took

[@arthurrey578]

x + (x + 1) + (x + 2) + (x + 3) + (x + 4) + (x + 5) + (x + 6) + (x + 7) + (x + 8) = 9x + 36 = 9(x + 4) Hence if x = 6, he'll take 90 damage. Easy enough to calculate quickly!

[@MemberHomei]

Arthur Rey Wow, the only correct answer here! Looks like everyone else doesn't understand abstraction.

[@Celrador]

I've posted it somewhere above already and will post it here as it is more generalized: (f*n)+((n(n+1))/2) = Damage f = last fatigue damage taken n = the number of draws It's just the respective triangular number (the guaranteed damage due to the amount of card draws) and the already taken fatigue damage (which means you just have to multiply the amount of card draws by the last fatigue damage taken), which are important. Example for this video: Last round before the kill the opponent took 5 fatigue and he was forced to draw 9 cards. (5*9)+((9(9+1))/2) = 45 + ((9*10)/2) = 45 + 90/2 = 45 + 45 = 90

[@arthurrey578]

I know that, but 9(n+4) is obviously way easier to compute.

[@Celrador]

Arthur Rey And obviously only applies in this case. What if you can only force 5 draws? You need to throw away your calculations and start from scratch, while I just gave you the generalized formula.

[@arthurrey578]

In that case it'd be 5(n+3). Of course it applies to certain scenarios, but Firebat explicitly said he didn't know how to do the maths, and didn't like it, so might as well have a few easy ways to do it.

[@HousseMousse]

Hey guys, what is Firebat's credit song please. I like his content, very nice

[@olivert.2241]

Wait who uploaded this video first? I've seen this before :O

[@ItachiWY]

me too! and not from reddit, i remember seeing this a few days before...weird

[@cutpursemasterofdisguise3674]

Maybe you played against it? I have... It's not amusing. -_-

[@green90s]

Just multiply the highest number with the one exactly in the middle of the set (if there is none, just take the .5 step between the two middle ones) and you get the result. Example: 1+2+3+4+5 = 5 x 3 = 15. Or 1+2+3+4 = 4 x 2.5 = 10.

[@Kikaha]

Because I don't thrust my math nor firebat's, I actually posed and made a "program" that calculate the damage for me.

[@NSlasher]

Resident sleeper warrior now counters itself, good maybe the deck will fuck off the ladder now.

[@aaabirb]

THAT"S THE PROBLEM WITH LADDER, not shaman, not shaman at all

[@cameronsprague101]

Damien Weyrauch lol only if you're playing shaman...

[@aaabirb]

cameronsprague101 i c

[@Runexn]

metapod used harden

[@Chaotic4Neutral]

ResidentSleep- PogChamp

[@sethzeiter6663]

Why isn't the Shield Block worth it? Even if we consider the eventual fatigue, it's basically worth (5 - (1 + n)) health - and the second one worth one less than that - where n is the difference between the cards in your opponent's deck and the cards in your deck. This is also not considering the huge drawback of milling Justicar.

[@IAMNEKOMIMI]

you're not using malchezaar for the ultimately fat warrior? though, on second thought I suppose he fills the same role as violet illusionist here, and in addition stuffs your deck with 2 good, and 3 useless cards.

[@WhiteDreamcatcher]

How would he fill the same role as the illusionist dude? she makes you invincible he only gives you 5 cards.. huge difference

[@IAMNEKOMIMI]

i figured that slightly after making that comment. turns out 4 cards times 2 is more than 5!

[@sweetweebygoodness8693]

Firebat y u no have elise or malchezaar? 😰

[@igotdatstankonaise4792]

If this deck isn't fun and interactive, then I don't know what is.

[@yannickvanlaatum7914]

Awesome video, i thought you would miscount XD

[@ungulatemanalpha]

triangular numbers are fun and interactive

[@MrDoctorDen]

Why Acolyte in this deck? Mb Doomsayers or Soggoth would be better?

[@morganfreeman9861]

Well... that felt fucking satisfying

[@0rcoserf]

the formula for the next games : n*(n-1)/2 + q*n where: n is the numer of cards that he will draw q is the fatigue damage that he will take at the first draw better know it when you play a fatigue deck

[@BrainOnVacation]

I'm fairly positive that Justicar is just a card

[@benniebees]

45 + 9x, where x is the last tick of fatigue dealt

[@walterantonioalbaan5452]

that deck looks so fun tbh

[@xmainsoulx]

I expected one hell of a fail lol

[@flaxxi3]

i was so sure he would miscalc haha

[@lordfugu132]

Is control warrior better than freeze mage ?

[@anniejellah1913]

control warrior is better against druid and healing decks, freeze mage is better against aggro paladin

[@lordfugu132]

so if i was to make one what would be better ?

[@HDuser100]

Aggro paladin, aka a deck nobody ever plays.

[@VictusBcb]

Better is very subjective, as not every deck matches up properly against every other deck. There really is no one-size fits all.

[@HDuser100]

VictusBcb Except when you play mid range shaman.

[@pizzo679]

Formula is ---> n(n+1)/2. 9 draws is 9(10)/2=45

[@ImTheSlyDevil]

we math'ed hard, team.

[@qualquerdez]

thaths why i play hs with pen and paper near

[@natesytacct]

People are putting up these weird formulas, I'm not gonna bother checking if they work. It's 9x + 45 (and works for negative numbers, so it will kill a 30hp opponent with 1 card remaining). The +45 I had to math out (cheated and used a calculator cause lazy), but its obviously going to do 9x the fatigue they just took.

[@natesytacct]

Actually, just tested negatives with calculator. it doesn't work other than -1. You'd have to memorize that 2 cards remaining would be 28 (formula would give 27) and 3 would be 21, 4 would be 15. It's subtracting 9 each time when it should subtract progressively less. There's prolly a more convoluted formula that would work, but I'd rather just remember 28,21,15, 10 if I were playing the deck.

[@Whitey_96]

Gotta think of a joke im early Priest

[@mikerinotrapsaregayerino9123]

its like watching two metapods

[@Sariiger]

You said 9 factorial, but that would be 1x2x3x4x5x6x7x8x9, which is VERY far from the actual 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9 damage Know your math, firebat

[@lovemaxaroni]

Brutal. Wow.

[@koshi6505]

Nine factorial damage?! That's 362880! Super OP! /s

[@ignaciospeicys4365]

7:27 nAAW

[@JP1348]

just start typing in you chrome browser address bar. 6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14... It gives you the answer.

[@gianlucabrambati3465]

è una cagata pazzesca di mazzo!

[@ChuckyMasterDF]

such pro player

[@noway4879]

Impressive !

[@harrysingh2176]

"fun and interactive"

[@rorymalone3805]

Plox get a decklist that shows what you've drawn m8os.

[@benjaminthiessen7346]

did he need justicar? find out next time on firebat doesn't do the math

[@Flazius]

There's a reason it says "legend" in the end. Nice math tho.

[@yandrosyoutube]

RIP Control Warrior :(

[@Jamick98Geass]

Miller Time.

[@htuy42]

he shoulda sat on the justicar :(

[@tyleringram6957]

KZbin trying to make me watch a minute long unskippable ad. That's a joke right?

[@tranquilise8992]

Firebat it was 76 if it was 5 cards into fatigue. Not 90 you goose... The card after makes it 90.. The combo does 36 dmg from 0 fatigue.

[@solskido]

11 + 4 :thinking:

[@Gabbagandalf5000W]

holy smokes

[@MrCleytun]

12:10

[@connor_walker]

12:00 your welcome

[@joshyman221]

Lol someone in chat though the sum to 9 was 9! xD

[@johnmandrake4934]

(x-8)4-((x(1+x))/2)=-90 x= cards overdrawn There you have your formula

[@WiseAlbatross]

never punished