When I tell you this was one of the few movies I’ve seen in theaters where when it ended the audience just stayed for like a solid minute just in silence……..that was just bliss.
@max2themax11 ай бұрын
Yeah... the atmosphere in the theatre after the movie ended was really tense, everyone just felt so heavy about the thought of that chain reaction. Almost noone talked even on the way out, just slowly walking out of the room with a head full of thoughts. And I had the privilige of seeing it in 70mm IMAX, it was just so immersive.
@christianwise63711 ай бұрын
@@max2themax I felt like I was in a complete stupor walking back to my house from the cinema, that final scene was incredibly haunting and I haven't been able to stop thinking about it since I first saw it
@DestinyAwaits1911 ай бұрын
This movie was confusing, boring and shit. One of Nolan's worst.
@joshuatumambo567411 ай бұрын
@@DestinyAwaits19 Logan Paul is that you?
@DestinyAwaits1911 ай бұрын
@@joshuatumambo5674 No. But what I said is still true.
@keeganbate893511 ай бұрын
I think the biggest triumph of this movie is the pacing. This movie wouldn't have worked with a different director, Nolan is an expert at this. He can use stress to make Dunkirk feel like a 3 hour movie instead of 1 hour and 45 minutes. And here, he makes a 3 hour movie feel like 2. It's crazy how well told this story is.
@SaiyanHeretic11 ай бұрын
Agreed. For such a long movie that is mostly people talking soberly in small rooms, it's amazingly suspenseful. I was breathless for the whole run time.
@iz72311 ай бұрын
I'm not sure I agree, the first half of the movie was way too fast, with very frequent cuts and location changes it felt like a trailer.
@earlofwickshire541611 ай бұрын
The expression on her face in the thumbnail is the same she would have if she would just try the Sybian just once like I asked 😤
@MuffinMcFluffin11 ай бұрын
@iz723 Partly agree, but in the "You only have three hours of film to assemble" kind of way, and we can take that literally because that's all that could fit on an IMAX platter, his back-and-forth made the most compelling version of the story. There is a video out there that brings up the copious amounts of pacing and narrative issues that occurs if this same film is presented in chronological order, and why it was necessary for Nolan to present it this way. I forget what it's called.
@MuffinMcFluffin11 ай бұрын
@iz723 The only reason I partly agree, by the way, is because yes I wish that front end was even longer, but I understand it can't be.
@Jordashian9311 ай бұрын
Cillian Murphy did a fantastic job with his portrayal of Dr. Oppenheimer! Not only did he resemble Dr. Oppenheimer, he was able to capture all of the fear and torment with his facial expression alone! Christopher Nolan truly brought filmmaking up a notch!
@kidflash990511 ай бұрын
The scene where they lift him up after Trinity, he really looks like Oppenheimer
@RoRo27.11 ай бұрын
Coming from someone who had the briefest of knowledge of Oppenheimer; I found the story so captivating
@josephwallace20211 ай бұрын
I really hope you didn't take a lot of this at face value, because there's a lot of crucial stuff here in places that's just plain wrong
@saviomutaganda164211 ай бұрын
@@josephwallace202Care to share? Didn’t know anything about creation of the atomic bomb and its management post-WW2 before the movie
@josephwallace20211 ай бұрын
@saviomutaganda1642 for one thing, the scene where Oppenheimer "quotes" Marx, as though to imply his immense intellect had processed the entire corpus of his work and found his ideas lacking beyond a shadow of a doubt? He's quoting Proudhon, a man who is literally an adversary of Marx's.
@Balleehuuu11 ай бұрын
@@josephwallace202 the biography of Oppenheimer is not based of single quotes or the correctness of all details and if it is biased, well the truth of a mans life is almost always only known to that man alone. But for the story around the character of Oppenheimer ... yeah that is really well researched in many parts. I recommend the "startalk" (youtube podcast/channel) episode from Neil de Grasse-Tyson about the movie "Oppenheimer", that is really informative to that point and about all the scienctist shown in the film.
@Balleehuuu11 ай бұрын
I really agree with you @RoRo27 and the movie has inspired me to look into the complex of the Manhattan project and the consequences of living in the atomic time - and contrary to what @josephwallace202 has written it didn't get a lot of crucial stuff wrong, when you look for the story that evolves around the man - the developing of the atomic bomb, the scientist involved and I also think it captures the doubt of that whole project really well ...
@dlweiss11 ай бұрын
While I understand why you feel like the Rami Malek scene was redundant after the audience had already gotten that information about Strauss, I think the point of that scene was to answer Oppenheimer's question of "is anyone ever going to tell the truth about what happened here?" So it's less about the audience feeling surprised, and more about the audience feeling vindicated and relieved that at least some measure of justice was served. The scientific community avenged one of their own. Fantastic reaction and discussion, as always! :)
@Doutsoldome11 ай бұрын
Yes, I agree with you on this point.
@danielhenderson375311 ай бұрын
Absolutely! I really needed that, and it totally worked.
@KS-xk2so11 ай бұрын
Yeah it was completely needed, both because its an important part of the Oppenheimer story in general, and because without it, he'd then one day be "redeemed" and what we just assume the why happened off screen?
@aquiamorgan241611 ай бұрын
Exactly! I felt like the first telling was meant to make you make you sick and disgusted that Strauss could do something so sinister, and the second was meant to make us feel vindicated. I don't think the first one was meant to be a gotcha moment, either, at least not in the traditional sense. It was more meta than that. It was Strauss trying to force a gotcha moment, to stroke his own ego, and having it not land the way he thought it would.
@Heathen911 ай бұрын
Thank you for pointing that out for the folks that obviously didn’t get that point in the film. See, I assumed that everyone understood that sequence of events. However, after watching & listening to her review, I see that I was clearly wrong. lol
@UncleMilo11 ай бұрын
I think we needed the B plot since Oppenheimer's career was destroyed by Strauss and it is important to know why this happened.
@reflexjat382211 ай бұрын
Crazy it also destroyed Strauss career as well
@coldplayfan607011 ай бұрын
@@reflexjat3822 Did it now?
@miguelconamor668711 ай бұрын
As much as I love seeing Nat's first reactions to blockbuster movies like Oppenheimer, I *really* wish she watched it in theaters because it was just a different experience
@NatalieGoldReacts11 ай бұрын
Oh I'm sure it was just SPECTACULAR in theatres
@rvvinayak224311 ай бұрын
@@NatalieGoldReacts Can't explain how amazing the experience was
@MrBrax11 ай бұрын
Maybe in imax. Regular one wasn't that special at least as it was the only one I had access to
@acdragonrider11 ай бұрын
@K.C-2049Good luck! Cinephiles out there also watch five hour to six hour films by filmmakers from places like Hungary 😂 Then there are older films like Ben Hur and Gone with the Wind
@captainziggy8211 ай бұрын
I was just thinking this!
@MikeTaffet11 ай бұрын
Fun fact about the speed of sound: The shockwave IS the sound of the explosion. I saw a rocket launch from a distance of 50 miles and it took 4 minutes for the sound of the launch to arrive. Some people during the Trinity test were 20 miles away, so it would have taken about 1.6 minutes for the shockwave/sound to hit them
@michalpetrilak397611 ай бұрын
Oppenheimer's observatory was 9 km from the bomb tower, so the sound arrived with a delay of 27 seconds.
@StateGenesys11 ай бұрын
Wrong, shock waves and sound waves are two completely different things. 🤦🏻
@Onaterdem11 ай бұрын
@@StateGenesys No they're not.
@StateGenesys11 ай бұрын
@@Onaterdem try again kid🤦🏻 Literally 3 seconds on google would have kept you from looking dumb 😂🤡
@Onaterdem11 ай бұрын
@@StateGenesys Clearly, propagation of vibration through the air is different than propagation of vibration through the air.
@peach-panther11 ай бұрын
“I believe we did” is one if the hardest endings ever. Strauss was too delulu to see there were bigger things than vendettas against him.
@justAman54811 ай бұрын
It may take away from it, but it popped into my head when I read this. It’s almost like the “oh” line from John Wick
@gopalarora999711 ай бұрын
Bro what is "delulu" I see it on instagram stories and I don't understand please help me it haunts my dreams
@peach-panther11 ай бұрын
@@gopalarora9997 Just short for delusional. A false belief to be true like Strauss thinking Oppenheimer was talking about him to Einstein.
@gopalarora999711 ай бұрын
@@peach-panther Oh thank you, now I can be at peace
@peach-panther11 ай бұрын
@@gopalarora9997 Np man.
@neesonnaidoo474511 ай бұрын
I don't think any ending has hit me harder than this one. Cillian's subtle facial acting was phenomenal, the eerie tone of when he says "I believe we did" along with Einstein's realisation and the visions, realising that we are part of the world that Oppenheimer feared is absolutely terrifying
@Waggers78911 ай бұрын
Me too! I sat in the cinema for ages just thinking about what I'd seen and experienced and what has happened in the world since the bomb was first made, it given the world power it shouldn't have and when I left the cinema it was raining, which felt fitting.
@ZandrickKrowe11 ай бұрын
The level of anxiousness leading to detonation was something I’ve never felt before. Beautiful movie. The lenses used, the lighting, the sound, the acting, the editing. everything about this movie was absolutely stunning. The choice of using black and white with Strauss kind of describes his perspective. He only sees the world in black and white.
@glibmgo901711 ай бұрын
The final line of this movie "I believe we did" is one of if not the best endings of a movie I have ever seen.
@Afreshio11 ай бұрын
And the Goransson track hits... instant goosebumps.
@fastestfail26453 ай бұрын
He didn't though. The guy was a cry baby.
@rowenjohnson11 ай бұрын
"I believe we did" is a line that has stuck with me for months, one of the best endings to a movie that I've seen
@ThePyroSquirrel111 ай бұрын
Ngl I love the direction decisions, Christopher Nolan really just did what he wanted and it all worked. I loved that once the bomb is taken away from Oppenheimer’s hands the destruction haunts him in every scene. The use of the stamping feet growing louder and then the cut to silent by that single scream is brilliant sound design. I can’t get enough of this film and I’ve only seen it twice 😅
@miosundling378511 ай бұрын
saw it four times in theater
@ADifferentVibe11 ай бұрын
I loved this film. People who don't get the black and white sequences probably have never seen a Nolan film where he uses black/white for objective and color for subjective. That's not a fault on Nolan.
@shitfilm11 ай бұрын
agreed. saw it twice in imax and i know ill watch it many many more.
@beefjezos271311 ай бұрын
The imagery does mean something, the montage is showing how his education led him to visualize atomic structure, which at the time was not well understood at all. Niels Bohr was probably the most important in this regard, the fact that the montage happens right after Robert meets him is not a coincidence.
@Jabersson11 ай бұрын
I really loved the B plot, because the irl scientific world is FILLED with stories of government and egos clashing, and problems snowballing and causing chain reactions. For anyone interested, @BobbyBroccoli makes great documentaries about those, that have exactly the same vibe as Oppenheimer
@dariuswilson713311 ай бұрын
Best dang movie of the year! The actors' performance, music, and the visual effects are phenomenal! I loved every single minute of it! 10/10
@shonen24511 ай бұрын
Hmm, I think the plot from Strauss perspective is definitely needed for the story. It's a movie about Oppenheimer, his whole life, not only creating the A-bomb. An important and impactful event in his life is how his public image got destroyed through backstabbing politics. That's why Strauss plot is there.
@ArthurAveiro9 ай бұрын
And also to shine a light on the communist boogeyman they create to discredit him, which is the same boogeyman they use today to discredit undesirables. It's a good way to connect the film to today.
@osmanyousif78493 ай бұрын
I also think it helps give different points of views about people too. Maybe that wasn’t the full intention. But what I got from this movie is that the movie Strauss intentions to be a bit nefarious. But, it would be foolish to place this all on Strauss’s shoulders and relieve Heimer of his own actions. as the movie does display that Oppenheimer did so many things that Strauss was never involved in that can be seen as morally questionable. So I don’t view this movie as having any clearcut villains.
@arch_enemy0311 ай бұрын
I love how the black and white is the narrative based on objectivity of others and the colour is the subjective narrative from the point of view of Robert Oppenheimer
@davidw.27918 ай бұрын
And ironic that Strauss’s PoV doesn’t distort events even tho he is petty and interpret events wrongly sometimes.
@scarecrowman778911 ай бұрын
No other movie has made me feel so anxious leading up to the trinity bomb. The entire imax bums were twitching. All credit to Nolan and the incredible actors.
@crazycatlady622611 ай бұрын
i have been saying the exact same thing! i even caught myself practically holding my breath until detonation. And then the complete silence after....just beautiful.
@spencerwattamaniuk95011 ай бұрын
Oppenheimer and Straus also personifies the MAD doctrine. Strauss ended Oppenheimer's career and his own career was ended in return, hence Fusion and Fission.
@MatrixRefugee9 ай бұрын
Ho boy, you're right (also, don't be surprised if World War II happens and goes nuclear due to some egotistical world leader having a petty spat with someone else and deciding to lob The Bombs (TM) at that someone else).
@davidw.27918 ай бұрын
Also I like to think Fusion stands for “something you didn’t want to happen but it happens anyway” because Opp didn’t want to build it.
@Marta-uv4id11 ай бұрын
I really love the movie on its own, but the score truly elevated it to a higher level. A lot of the scenes wouldn't even have half of the impact they had without the music.
@samwallaceart28811 ай бұрын
Ludwig Göransson is an MVP with all his projects; his score for _Tenet_ carries the whole film hardcore.
@shitfilm11 ай бұрын
you're absolutely right and ludwig goes crazyyyyy
@abdullahbhinder902317 күн бұрын
Which scene for instance?
@Marta-uv4id17 күн бұрын
@abdullahbhinder9023 The final scene. Cillian's acting is great enough for the scene to still be impactful, but without the music it would've been much weaker.
@theyoshow11 ай бұрын
The change between black and white/color was a change from subjective vs objective. That's how Nolan explained it
@spheromancer_10 ай бұрын
It was mostly Strauss's perspective versus Oppenheimer's perspective.
@AuroraNora310 ай бұрын
Also, without it, it'd be hard to understand the time jumps
@babyjohnsoniii11 ай бұрын
I’d have to disagree on your comments regarding the black and white scenes. Oppenheimer is actually an adaptation of a biography by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin called “American Prometheus: the Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer.” The “tragedy” the title refers to is a direct result of the conflict between Oppenheimer and Strauss that largely dominates the last half of the book after Los Alamos and the end of WWII. Now the most important aspect of his life is his contribution to the nuclear bomb, which is why that takes up a good chunk of the film’s runtime. But it’s not all there is to his life. Another important part of his life was when Strauss attempted to discredit and frame him out of spite, and the consequences which ensued from that. That’s the significance of the B plot and Strauss’ place in the film.
@spooky_lights11 ай бұрын
Yeah her review was kind of a weak take imo. I don’t see a valid reason to bring down the story because SHE got distracted from black and white scenes. I think it’s a “reaction” mindset that makes her think she has to have everything down and understand everything when great art invites questioning, and reaching deeper. If the black and white was where she got stumped, then yeah I don’t think she was mentally prepared to take it all in. Granted, this movie proves to be a challenging one to react to because of all the characters and following the plot. But the beauty of film is that it doesn’t live in a vacuum and you can rewatch a film like this a still learn new things and get new I sights.
@samwallaceart28811 ай бұрын
I always tell people, "This movie isn't ACTUALLY about the bomb; it's about the man and his place in history"
@samwallaceart28811 ай бұрын
@@spooky_lightsHer take is a common reaction to the film; a lot of people were just expecting a different type of film based on the first hour.
@ADifferentVibe11 ай бұрын
@@spooky_lights agree. I've seen less incisive reactors loving the black and white scenes and understood what Nolan was doing. And Natalie had nearly no negative comments on Barbie which was a far less complex film that had it's own narrative problems she chose to ignore. So IMHO, I would take her criticism of Oppenheimer with a huge grain of salt. Since the black and white scenes were her only major critique, this film is overall perfect.
@calosoma9 ай бұрын
Totally agree, and I appreciate your articulation for the need for the "B" plot. This is my first time watching one of her reactions so I thought seeing her react to Oppenheimer would be a good place to start. I'm quite unimpressed with her post commentary, and I'll probably not bother to watch her reactions to other films. Especially if black and white is a hangup for her in films, then just wow. As if it detracts from the film in any way. If anything, it aids in identifying the timeline and B plot. Usually Nolan never employs black and white, even when tracking multiple timelines (or simultaneous dream layers etc), so I suspect Nolan partially did this here in order to make it easier on the audience. Definitely not a negative, but a positive instead. According to the comment in this sub-thread here, if she had less negative things to say about the Barbie film, I'm just happy to move right along. Good day all!
@axr714911 ай бұрын
This has proven to be a major year not only for big name directors, but also for movies based on devastating real-life events as well. In addition to OPPENHEIMER, Martin Scorsese’s KILLERS OF THE FLOWER MOON also fits that criteria. A required viewing in my view, especially with the self-aware ending. EDIT: Also add THE ZONE OF INTEREST to that category as well.
@AL-fl4jk11 ай бұрын
Great film
@henrikbartnes842411 ай бұрын
also barbie
@cheddarandsourcream11 ай бұрын
The guy who Oppenheimers wife refused to shake hands with is Edward Teller he mentions earlier in the movie that he’s researching the possibility of the hydrogen bomb. He would go on to create said bomb and it is roughly one thousand times more powerful than the atomic bomb.
@AlasdairGR11 ай бұрын
Honestly the scene with Kitty and the imagined projection of Jean just staring at each other is one of my favorite depictions of cheating ever, visually at least. It really would feel like that if you learned your partner cheated on you, because all you can imagine is them in bed together while you're hopelessly on the sideline. All the trust and intimacy you thought you had together is gone.
@MuffinMcFluffin11 ай бұрын
I agree, but I think it would've hit harder had Kitty not known about that before. Apparently she was very aware already.
@AlasdairGR10 ай бұрын
@@MuffinMcFluffin I personally disagree. I think that pain, resentment, and loss of trust still cuts deep, even years later. Oppie is having his whole life and all its controversies drudged back up and that's also going to bring back the very visceral emotions Kitty kept mostly buried down during the Manhattan Project.
@MuffinMcFluffin10 ай бұрын
@@AlasdairGR I feel that for sure, and totally get you. I think the fact that WE didn't know about it beforehand makes it feel weird when afterward he says "You already knew," blah blah blah. We didn't know that she knew, so that revelation after takes back why I think as I do in the moment. That being said, I'm not asking them to change the real life story and say "It would be better if they made it so she didn't know" when she actually did, so I'm not actually complaining.
@HaganeNoGijutsushi11 ай бұрын
The part where the bomb feels silent isn't just an artistic choice... they literally didn't hear anything at first because they were too far. Like seeing the flash of lighting before hearing the thunder. The sound caught up with them a few seconds later.
@kena9011 ай бұрын
I’m surprised at her reaction. This was one of the best films I’ve seen in years.
@priscillapicolita704010 ай бұрын
Exactly
@ijchua11 ай бұрын
40:44 No, that article is incorrect. Nolan has said in interviews that the color scenes are from Oppenheimer's subjective point-of-view, while the monochromatic scenes are outside of Oppenheimer's, the objective point-of-view. It has nothing to do with Strauss.
@bc70138 ай бұрын
FACT
@robert.donnelly11 ай бұрын
Key Cillian Murphy movies: - 28 Days Later (One of the best zombie movies ever made) - Intermission (Great "modern" Irish movie, has Colin Farrell and Colm Meaney) - Wind That Shakes The Barley (Heartbreaking film about the Irish civil war) - Sunshine (Really unique scifi movie)
@Hugo__IV11 ай бұрын
Watching this in 70mm IMAX was life-changing. The sound and the cinematography were just amazing! If an IMAX theater shows it near you, go and watch it!!
@friedporchetta11 ай бұрын
I loved seeing in on 70mm. At one point one girl was doing selfies and filming on her phone WITH THE FLASH ON. Everyone was livid.
@ParkDongJun11 ай бұрын
I'm sad bc there's no IMAX on my city, and the nearest IMAX is 532 km distance from me. I was so impressed the whole time in regular cinema, can't imagine if I saw it on IMAX, would be more awesome. but nonetheless, it's still the most beautiful movie I've seen this year
@Yggdrasil4211 ай бұрын
We need more 15/70mm theatres in Europe. There's like 3 in the entire continent, seriously! Thankfully there's a good Dolby Cinema theatre near me so the experience was good.
@DearxMyxSongs6 ай бұрын
I really wanna see it in imax when it does eventually come back to theaters, but when I saw it, I caught the 35mm film viewing and it was simply incredible.
@thomaschristopherwhite904311 ай бұрын
Albert and Opie were gods discussing destructive powers beyond comprehension and Strauss the wee mortal thought they were talking shit behind his back. His biggest mistake was thinking he was on their level.
@jsmithers.11 ай бұрын
Cry 🤡
@oROBBIEo11 ай бұрын
@@jsmithers. What a stupid comment. It's clear why your parents don't love you.
@joshmayes153811 ай бұрын
???@@jsmithers.
@jsmithers.11 ай бұрын
@@joshmayes1538 🤡
@gaiusx28711 ай бұрын
What made Einstein and Oppenheimer wise was their humility and ability to stay grounded. They knew they weren’t gods. Ironically, Strauss was the one who wanted glory and power
@knasigboll11 ай бұрын
I really enjoy the first part of the movie when Oppenheimer goes around gathering famous scientist like it's the avengers
@jmwild111 ай бұрын
I remember when Oppie's grandson was talking about being upset about the apple story, but it was in the book precisely because it was a story Oppie told to friends. Whether it's true or not I guess we'll never know, but it's true that Oppie told that story. He did go to therapy for a couple years after the incident, and he was diagnosed with schizophrenia which was likely wrong. Clearly he was an impulsive person in his youth though, as the apple story conveys. In that event, he was able to act on his regret before it was too late, something he did not do soon enough with the development of the atomic bomb.
@lesgrice441911 ай бұрын
Apparently when he was that age or younger he suffered terrible depressions and was found curled up on the floor or his bed in a foetal position and other stuff too, he went through some very bad mental traumas and his childhood was very unusual, quite solitary, and on top of all that his mind was working at such a pace - maybe the apple is more representative of his state of mind without doing a childhood history lesson...
@dh-xs7hy6 ай бұрын
took me forever to watch this one and I haven't been able to stop thinking about it for the past two weeks. Nolan never misses.
@dinsism11 ай бұрын
This is my favourite film of the year! I saw it twice in cinemas and i loved every moment of it! ♥️ One of my favorite movie going experiences!
@keke4801814111 ай бұрын
I watched this in theater, the scene where they did the trinity test was absolutely breathtaking, and that actually explosion sound made me jump so hard. That’s something you can only experience in theaters
@friedporchetta11 ай бұрын
I was fortunate enough to see this on actual 70mm film in theaters. Was fantastic. Can’t wait to experience it again!
@MFBloosh11 ай бұрын
Cilian Murphy is one of my favorite actors of the last 20 years. He's phenomenal in Peaky Blinders, although everyone is great in that show lol.
@Jayanth11 ай бұрын
The whole criticism with B&W perspective creative choice is something that I've never heard of a bare minimum criticisms that Oppenheimer have gotten so far. It's actually surprising to hear this new perspective, that B&W took you out of story, and made you aware you're in B&W now. Personally, I felt it's icing on the cake that had made this narrative much more rich and compelling. I don't know if it's a good idea either to make RDJ's color too, as that would make it even harder for a viewer to keep up with the story.
@nicoladc8911 ай бұрын
Nolan did almost the same thing in Memento.
@Jayanth11 ай бұрын
@@nicoladc89 Yeah. He said he wanted to bring back that idea again, and reapply it on the biopic. It worked for me, I guess for most of the viewers. Natalie's pov was unexpected.
@rowenjohnson11 ай бұрын
I really like the decision for Strauss' perspective and plot to be in B&W not only to make the plots distinct from each other, but also as a commentary on how "Black and White" Strauss is in many of his scenes. He's either in or out, they were talking about him and him only, he thinks he's more important than he really is, things of that nature
@xavvi11 ай бұрын
Yeah that was some bullshit by her
@acidrain9211 ай бұрын
@@Jayanth Didnt work for me either. I really didn't care about the Strauss story at all. The film didn't spend enough time with any of the characters aside from Oppenheimer for me to be emotionally connected to any of them.
@KINGVAMP_95411 ай бұрын
From someone who has a keen understanding of fission and fusion physics, I believe this is the greatest Biopic of the last decade. The way Christopher Nolan layers his movies with subtle differences in cinematography depending on when the event play out is master class. Also for him to unpack the entire life of Oppenheimer and summarize it with such attention to detail while also putting his own twist to things is just impressive. Christopher Nolan is the greatest director of all time.
@Zombiesnyder1311 ай бұрын
Hollywood needs old-school auteurs like Nolan more than ever
@axr714911 ай бұрын
And Scorsese as well
@WoofHmmmmmmmm11 ай бұрын
To offset these horrible comic book nerd movies that make me sick to my stomach.
@dimitryanyanwu768111 ай бұрын
Wouldn't say Nolan is old school as he tend to mix Bluckbusters and Artistic Cinema in his movies, hence his success as he appeals to the both sides of film fans 👌
@ThePyroSquirrel111 ай бұрын
@@dimitryanyanwu7681 i see Nolan more like Michael Mann with his style
@LockeDemosthenes211 ай бұрын
Absolutely, they're a dying breed.
@Lady_Vengeance11 ай бұрын
Cillian Murphy was born for this role. I have some big problems with the script and Nolan’s direction, but Cillian’s performance is unimpeachable. He captured this haunted man with complete authenticity. Remarkable.
@themikereda11 ай бұрын
I think the Strauss section had to be B&W because we're jumping between 3 timelines and like 30 characters, so if they all looked the same it would be impossible to tell where/when we are in the story.
@jimmyrocha841711 ай бұрын
So I did the whole Barbenheimer thing and watched this first…and the emotional whiplash I was hit with going from the ending of this movie to the beginning of Barbie was so surreal lmao
@KoolAidManOG11 ай бұрын
The third hour centering on Strauss' hearing is the best part of the movie, full stop. Strauss' story also makes way more sense on second viewing. The culmination of the movie is Strauss and Robb "cross-examining" Oppenheimer and calling out his hypocrisy and contradictions. Strauss and Robb are both awful but they also aren't wrong about Oppenheimer. Dr Hill's actual real life deposition was even more on the nose and harsh in real life, if you can believe it. Its crazy. I'll also say that everyone I know liked it even more the second time. Maybe it'll be like that for you too!
@rodrigofoli11 ай бұрын
Christopher Nolan and his soundtracks duos are amazing. I love both Hans Zimmer for his previous work and Ludwig Goransson's for his recent ones. "Can you hear the music" is my favorite track from Oppenheimer
@r2d2rxr11 ай бұрын
The two sections Fission and Fusion are about how Oppenheimer saw the world vs how he was viewed. This goes back to the idea that he was likened to Prometheus. This is just another element of the torment/ consequence for his actions.
@britt9058 ай бұрын
This movie made me cry about five separate times, and then I cried again walking out of the theatre. So deeply disturbing and makes you so conscious of how easily humans forget.
@Wuffskers10 ай бұрын
I did the whole barbenheimer thing and even though it seemed like Barbie overshadowed Oppenheimer in online discourse for me the last scene of Oppenheimer was so chilling and impactful that it was by far the thing that stuck with me the most between both movies, I was thinking about it for days afterward
@dylanshields710611 ай бұрын
I ended up watching this movie in cinemas twice. The first time in IMAX with my parents. Then a second time with my brother only a couple days later 😂
@KS-xk2so11 ай бұрын
Nolan has stated that the black and white was done to differentiate the two storylines and their differing perspective. The black and white is told objectively with confirmable history while the colour is told subjectively from Oppenheimers specific point of view. You can even see a difference in Murphy's performance of Oppenheimer in the two sets of scenes. He comes off more cold and aloof in the black and white, since thats how he was percieved by some who didn't know him well. While in the colour scenes we get to see his internal thoughts and traumas that colour his changing perspective. The film is quite literally built to be a story about a story about a story. The hearing talks about Oppenheimers trial which talks about them making the bomb and the years after. Not to mention the entire animus of Oppenheimer being exhiled after the war then eventually welcomed back years later was entirely driven by the machinations of Strauss, and then his public denial and the exposure of leading the witch hunt for Oppenheimer is part of what led to the publics changed views on Oppenheimer, which then led to him being "welcomed back".... its kind of a key piece of the mans life story. Cutting it out would make zero sense.
@anakamarvelous11 ай бұрын
You really had to see this in theaters to REALLY appreciate it. The effects going through your body makes you FEEL this drama.
@rhiilo11 ай бұрын
I think this was the best way to tell this story. It's physically impossible for Chris. Nolan to tell a story in the chronological order, so the whole conspiracy around Oppenheimer's case was a good choice from him. Very well shot, acted, edited, and musically illustrated.
@samwallaceart28811 ай бұрын
Ironically his time-bending movie Tenet is the _only_ Nolan film that's told in straight chronological order (from the character's perspectives)
@ZukoHalliwell11 ай бұрын
Not impossible. _The Dark Knight_ and _The Dark Knight Rises_ were in chronological order.
@rhiilo11 ай бұрын
@@ZukoHalliwell Yes indeed, but it was a franchise, not a creation of his own ykwim.
@loganastrup687011 ай бұрын
The black and white shots are meant to represent Strauss point of view and the color shots are from Oppenheimer’s point of view. It’s a great way to keep the storylines separate and is another great visual metaphor for how Lewis thought Oppie and Einstein were talking about them when they weren’t.
@Jigsaw0g11 ай бұрын
Man I saw this in theatres 4 times! Such a good film and im so glad people are finally able to react to it!
@akin0hi2410 ай бұрын
I'm late to the party but I just gotta say, the theater experience with this movie is incomparable to anything I've ever watched. Such a masterpiece!! I remember sitting for a good 15 minutes after that ending, speechless and unmoving because that day, I might as well have witnessed one of the best endings I had in the theaters aaaa
@BillMinks-b6o11 ай бұрын
I don't understand what you said about the B plot being weak. Especially the Rami Malek part. That was my favorite part because it's what brings down Downey's character finally and after we learn about how he ruined Oppenheimer its poetic because that's what brings him down as well. Also Rami Malek is great in that scene. The whole movie would not have the same effect, the same themes, the same metaphors and poetry without the B plot and the Strauss hearing. Also the acting is getting "heavy handed" because all the tension is and intensity of the whole movie is culminating towards the end. I don't understand the idea of cutting things out of this movie. You need as much time for all the info of this complex story and cutting it down would only hurt the movie. And if the Strauss scenes weren't in Black and White it risks getting extremely confusing. I would recommend a rewatch because I simply don't understand some of these critisicms.
@brendankehl661511 ай бұрын
If you like Cillians performance you should watch Peaky Blinders
@marsspacex606511 ай бұрын
Seeing this in imax was one of the greatest experiences ever in a cinema for me. It just isn’t the same at home.
@internetexplorer999011 ай бұрын
To clarify, everything in color is from Oppenheimer’s POV and is subjective to what actually happened, while everything in black and white is word for word what actually happened since we have court documents/records to prove it. I went into the movie knowing that and it helped a lot!
@justAman54811 ай бұрын
How did you respond so fast? I haven’t see any version of internet explorer be this fast, pretty much ever
@ravensdark999 ай бұрын
That thing will literally win every Oscar possible..that was likely the best Nolan movie of all time (which in itself is nuts)..and RDJ on Murphy both deserve outright Oscars for their performances..as well as Blunt..this movie was INSANE..and likely had the best closing dialogue of the last 50 y in a movie..
@jdogaming345511 ай бұрын
Cillian Murphy in Peaky Blinders is a must watch.
@timpage942411 ай бұрын
Saw it 4 times in theaters and if they bring it back next year for an Oscars push i will be back. The Trinity Test sequence and the speech following is probably the most harrowing and upsetting stuff i saw this year. (Haven't seen Zone of Interest but i imagine that would top it) and on an IMAX screen the scale of the fireball rising into the sky, towering over you while Oppenheimer sees the visions that have haunted him in the fire ball, incredible. The culmination of Nolan's work.
@yaskynemma922011 ай бұрын
This movie was great, I think the could make some of the historic scenes a little bit more clear so they could edit more of the movie and make it shorter but is great the way it is, I also loved the music and sound design, and the final dialogue between Einstein and Oppenheimer is in my opinion the best way to end it
@Waggers78911 ай бұрын
One quote I love that Nolan said about Oppenheimer is ‘he's dancing between the raindrops’ and it unlocks something for Cillian about how to play Oppenheimer. That what water and rain are important in the film.
@alextan147811 ай бұрын
This is my ALL-TIME favorite movie of 2023 and my all-time favorite Christopher Nolan movie alongside Dunkirk (2017). I saw it in IMAX, twice. First with my girlfriend in IMAX Digital and again with my dad in IMAX 70mm. As a junkie for visual suspense, the Trinity Test is my favorite scene in the movie because of the anticipation for the countdown as well as the blast itself. When my girlfriend & I first saw it, we were wondering "Where's the boom?" Then the shockwave from the blast jolted me to the back of my seat. Both times when that scene started building up, my heart was racing at 115 bpm on my watch. The speech at the gym was also intense because of Oppie having visions of a woman, played by Christopher Nolan's daughter, Flora, whose skin starts peeling. Not only that, the wall behind him starts shaking while he's static and then the BOOM as we cut to the crowd starts cheering for Oppie. He also sees various hallucinations around him as he leaves the gym. Now that's terrifying. This is also my all-time favorite movie that Robert Downey Jr. starred in. His performance as Lewis Strauss was so well done.
@richardmeyer100711 ай бұрын
You were spot on about CGI not having “texture”. That was the word I’ve been looking for.
@trey_porter11 ай бұрын
It was a great watch in imax. First time in a theater where i was so anxious where i feel my heartbeat during the countdown for the bomb.
@WastelandBowman8 ай бұрын
The sound design of the shockwave in theaters was insane, especially in IMAX.
@elena_petrova11 ай бұрын
Omg, finally! Can't wait to see your reaction! I loved all of the movie, it's simply a masterpiece
@grahamrichardson962011 ай бұрын
When I saw this in the theaters, the power went out just before the Trinity test scene. It was the biggest tension break ever!
@GildedJackal11 ай бұрын
Shout out to Cameron for whittling down a 3 hour+ reaction to 45 minutes.
@luminaryprism759 ай бұрын
I went into Oscar season being like “Yeah Barbie will probably clean up” and then I watched this and like…just wow. Everything about it was masterful. Best movie I’ve seen in a long time.
@mjvdg419411 ай бұрын
The way I perceived Strauss’ black/white world was more in the sense that it was a world where the facts had been decided and cemented already, whereas Oppenheimer’s world still seemed to have possible different futures and perspectives. Not so much that it was Strauss' mindset, but that the world itself had been decided and it was just presenting history. I didn’t have a problem at all with that being black/white but I for sure get why it’d pull you out of things.
@redeyedstudios19587 ай бұрын
What I love about this movie is Ik what is gonna happen, but yet I felt so tense while watching the explosion cause I thought the world might end. I love movies that still make me feel tense but Ik what’s gonna happen
@mikesmicroshop438511 ай бұрын
I am confused that the B plot was an issue for you but you were interested in what was happening with Oppinhimmer! The whole point of including the B plot was that it was what happened to Oppenhimmer!!!! The whole movie was about Oppenhimmer so leaving out major events that were all connected to his participation in the events of that time would be kinda missing the whole point of the movie!
@RemboBajingo11 ай бұрын
From what I understand the scenes in black and white are historically accurate, the scenes in color are artistic interpretation
@rustywarrior528811 ай бұрын
This movie is a Masterpiece. Can't wait to see what Chris Nolan comes up with next.
@johnpooky8410 ай бұрын
I think Nolan has topped Spielberg as my favorite director (and I'm a HUGE Jurassic Park fan).
@davidcarnevale888511 ай бұрын
Me and a group of friends went and saw this in IMAX, such an immersive experience that left us in total shock and awe. Most of the audience just sat frozen still after the movie ended until the staff came to clean up. We talked for about 3 hours about the movie and the entire project as a whole and the implications. Some of us were angry, most were sad, all were stunned.
@johnpooky8410 ай бұрын
*shock(wave) and awe
@dansiegel99511 ай бұрын
FYI, the speed of light (what you see) is always faster than the speed of sound (the sound of an explosion and its shockwave) - a few films have shown this correctly, with perhaps a 1/4second delay between the visual explosion and the sound it produced from a LONG shot of the explosion. However, with an atomic weapon detonation, the explosion can be seen from several miles away, therefore requiring several full seconds for the sound to arrive.
@hoshinoutaite11 ай бұрын
I recall reading about someone who was in a theater, and asked out loud, "I wonder if there's a post-credits scenes?" Someone replied, "Yeah. You're living in it." The atomic age changed everything. The threat of nuclear weapons has never truly gone away.
@ailouros666911 ай бұрын
@6:37 Fun Fact: In this scene, Niels Bohr, played by Kenneth Branagh, tells Oppenheimer to study under Physicist and Mathematician Max Born. And Max Born is the paternal grandfather of singer Olivia Newton John.
@jamiekopmann887711 ай бұрын
I felt an impact by the use of color vs black and white schemes because it felt like the color was Oppie’s open view at the world and other beliefs, studies, and horrors about his effect on the world. Then Strauss was so focused on only his no one else’s. Oppie listened to people/the world around him, Strauss never did.
@haridaspalleeri676511 ай бұрын
I dont know how you can say the B plot was unecessary because it really isnt plot A and B, its just plot A told from two different times.
@MrPicklerwoof11 ай бұрын
Yeah, I'm slightly puzzled. I think she may be misinterpreting the gist of the film tbh. Although, it's easy to do sometimes.
@andrewcrowder49587 ай бұрын
Ms. Gold, thank you for this. You helped me understand this film better. I’m an economist and failed chemist who has worked in government to promote American energy technology overseas, and this film, which demonstrates the nexus of personal foibles, politics, technology, and storytelling, is a vital document for our times. Greetings from Kyoto.
@joerafferty324811 ай бұрын
The two longest films I've seen this year were Oppenheimer and Killers of the Flower Moon. I didn't feel the runtime on either of them, in fact it made me appreciate more what film as a medium is capable of achieving if the people who control the purse strings were actually willing to take more risks.
@wisemanofsorts606811 ай бұрын
FINALLY!!!! I have been waiting months for your reaction to Oppenheimer 🎉
@Tommy197777711 ай бұрын
There were two schools of thought on Physics around this time. In one school you have "Classic Physics" which included Einstein. The other school (to which Oppemheimer belonged) was Quantum Mechanics.
@taiwandxt649311 ай бұрын
Yep.
@alielvargas11 ай бұрын
i will always remember watching this absolutely masterpiece in IMAX theaters, one of the best cinema experiences ever.
@jel1811 ай бұрын
The Robert Downey JR version of Sherlock Holmes is definitely something worth watching
@Dracogame11 ай бұрын
21:00 that shockwave is the reason why it was so good to watch this movie in a GREAT movie theater... The base was so strong it feels like you get pushed in your seat as well.
@glennwelsh978411 ай бұрын
This movie should definitely be the leader of the pack this awards season. Few directors today can make a 3-hour biopic largely comprised of people having quiet conversations in hushed tones and make it so riveting. And both Cillian Murphy and Robert Downey Jr deserve all the awards.
@mecheel76359 ай бұрын
The thing i love the most about this movie was, that the tiktok couple in the front row of cinema left after like an hour because they didnt expect such a movie after the barbenheimer memes.
@stephengibbons226011 ай бұрын
This is exactly how Christopher Nolan envisioned his film to be seen.
@Light-Rock9711 ай бұрын
18:30 I love her character, and I love this line in particular, short but encouraging,. She saw that he was a bit tense so she was like "You got this, man, no biggie." Not mom material apparently, not everyone is, but she never left his side, so she seemed like the best wife he could have asked for.
@warrenburke424111 ай бұрын
As a working theoretical chemist with experience in industry this is my favorite movie behind the LOTR series. No movie has shown what it feels like to go through school as a up incoming scientist. How our minds work thinking about concepts on the smallest scale possible and the unexpected consequences our research cause.
@JoseDavidTorres11 ай бұрын
As someone who watched this film twice in the theater and a few times at home with a pretty decent setup, the difference in experiencing it is just enormous. If you ever have the opportunity to watch on a movie theater, please do. Both visually and audio-wise, there's so much difference.
@richardfeynman445211 ай бұрын
There's this retold tale, that Fermi dropped a bunch papers when the bomb exploded, and just by measuring the distance the papers traveled he was able estimate the energy of the explosion. I cannot confirm the veracity of the tale but, the man was beast. Kinda hoped to see more about the moral and ethical take of these other scientists, whose work was vital for the creation of the bomb. Edit: there's also this theory that the leader of the atomic project on the other side Heisenberg, played dumb all along. Dunno maybe the allies shoulda done the same.