Fixed point iteration method - idea and example

[@J-hk8iw]

I don't understand how teachers and textbooks manage to make these topics ununderstandable. Great explanation!

[@toraritte-]

I've been trying to understand what this mystical "fixed point" is for MONTHS and your video achieved it before the 1 minute mark. (The Nix package manager uses this theory for example to override package definitions.)

[@aqwromio5107]

thanks!!!!! finally someone who actually does an example not only talks notations

[@neofortunate4521]

I've been trying to understand this topic/ module for a long time now but no luck. You're truly god sent, A whole big blessing Thank you so much. I fully understand all because of you. Stay blessed!

[@eulzzzz7682]

3:36 example (for those who don't have time)

[@sumanbanerjee6846]

Thank you..understood at the 11th hour of exam..

[@the-Math-guy]

Glad to be of help

[@zaidjunaid2659]

Great video , make me understand the concept as well!!

[@the-Math-guy]

Glad to be of help

[@thiagomiyazaki8883]

Thanks a lot for your explanation! Really helped me understand this topic! I am definitely going to check your other videos!

[@nurunnajwa3462]

Thank you! It help me to understand my programming assignment question :)

[@Yuuo45]

Thank you so much that’s was very helpful ✨🌸

[@richardxiong2825]

Very helpful video, thanks so much!

[@akilasithara2938]

thanks a lot today is my maths paper

[@sanaomar2182]

I like ur explanation, thank you so much

[@rajaaekant]

Clearly Explained .... Very nice

[@prajinbalaji5030]

Wddeu

[@mayartaher4445]

Thank you 😊, it’s amazing 👍🏼🌸

[@jasonthomas2908]

Good explanation, thanks

[@adamcurylo3400]

Thanks! Just a quick refresher under quarantine

[@aneesharora1981]

great job at explaining.

[@Anonymous-wt6ii]

Better than my numerical analysis' lecturer's explanation lol

[@shahzodadavlatova7203]

Great video, thank you.

[@tinabl-xd]

thank you so much! 🙏🏼

[@1ri-san]

I understand that if, by chance, we plugged in p into g(x) = x + f(x) and we get g(p) = p, then we have found a solution for f(x). What I don't understand is how we know that if we plug in an x - not necessarily p - then we know that to eventually converge to p, we use whatever g(x) = x + f(x) outputs as the new x.

[@sanelisodlaba7420]

how did he get the values to substitute in those equations?

[@codingsource7309]

Just find the domain of the function that will not make the value of g(x) more than 1.

[@anefuoche1053]

after the initial iteration, you substitute x for the value from the previous iteration

[@unistudent3133]

Nice video keep it up

[@dan-cj1rr]

Hi, for x(x-1) = 1 you say u start at xo =0 but i am not sure what are the next x0 you use, you say you get x2 = -1/2 but i have no clue why. It cannot be x0 = 1 so i am not sure what you use thanks.

[@GJuice]

you get x_1 from subbing in x_0 into x_1 = 1/(x_0 - 1) = 1 / (0-1) = -1

[@cristhianromero2504]

9:01😊

[@johnlabaon9627]

What if the initial approximation is not given ?

[@Rahejannat-660]

Sir can u solve this question f(x)=x-e^-x by fixed iteration method ?

[@cristhianromero2504]

3:00

[@farooqazam7894]

why x cannot be equal to zero ?

[@shoaib_azam]

ay tor satya

Denominator gets zero sp

[@StrzelbaStian]

In that case there was only an x in the denominator so x=0 would mean division by zero

[@sanjeeviitg5563]

great!

[@Heizungsrohre]

Great video. The way you write your x triggers me though

[@citymoose]

That's a sexy accent. Where are you from?

[@tonytanyanxue7533]

Not same method as my lecture teaches.

[@ankile]

Initial guell