Рет қаралды 28,589
Full flaps and two methods of pitot static calibration. So stoked to use the #jellybeanthorp trailing cone again. Hakan pulled out all the stops, I think you'll dig. See you in the comment section.
Website: www.wasabiaero...
Patreon: / elliotseguin
Tshirts and More preferredaltit...
Instagram: / edseguin
Facebook: / notifications
Sponsors:
Method Seven Eyewear: methodseven.com/
Butler Parachute: www.butlerpara...
Timestamps:
00:32 Introduction
01:03 Mx Performed
14:09 Trailing Cone Installation
16:04 Preflight Briefing
24:45 Trailing Cone Ground Operations
29:10 45° Flap Envelope Expansion
32:24 Stall Matrix
49:29 Post Flight Debrief
58:59 Hakan Debriefing Stall Video (best part of this video)
---Flt 007 Flight Report---
Summary:
Flt Date 12/5/2020
Engine Start: 10:20 LCL
Engine Shutdown: 12:35 LCL
Flt Time: 1.3 HRS
Landings: 1
Fuel State Takeoff: Full Tanks
Total Time After Flight: 4.9 Hrs
Chase: None
Data: My initial impression is that the difference in drag between 35° and 45° flaps is the most significant change. The aircraft handles nicely during a full flap stall with plenty of roll control and little tendency to drop a wing. The elevator position/force difference for flt 7 vs flt 6 was significant, likely due to the VGs added to the wing and tail. It took more elevator deflection to stall, and there wasn't the significant force change during the stall that was observed on flt 6. Worth noting, the flaps up stall is now the limiting stall.
The trailing cone showed little difference vs the ship static (stock location) in all configurations tested. The biggest difference was in the last 5 knots of the stall, during which the ship static would show an airspeed increase (~5 knots) while the airplane was still slowing, and the trailing cone showed a steady reduction in airspeed.
The GPS clover leaf showed an error (12% clean, 15% 35° flap, 20% 45° flap) at 1.2 VS, with the indicated speed being higher than the GPS calibration speed. Based on Hakan's CFD, he believes this can mostly be traced to pitot error due to high AOA.
On landing at 110 KIAS (as all previous landings) the difference in actual speed was apparent. Estimate the airplane was 15 knots faster than previous landings (recommend future approaches at 95 KIAS)
Power Settings
Take Off WOT/2700
Climb WOT/2500
Cruise WOT/2500
CHT Limit - 440°F Climb
420°F Cruise
Oil Temp - 215°F
Airspeed
VS0 - 57 KIAS (52 KCAS)
VS - 77 KIAS (70 KCAS)
Vrot - 83 KIAS (75 KCAS)
VFE - 110 KIAS (100 KCAS)
VLE - 134 KIAS (122 KCAS)
VA - 157 KIAS (143 KCAS)
VNE - 259 KIAS (235 KCAS)
LLF - +3.8g/-1.52g (flaps up)
+2.0g (Flaps Down)
Maintenance Before Flight
Aileron VGs
Wing Body VGs
More Tufting (Wing, Fuselage, H-Stab)
Static location back to stock
Transponder Replaced
Altitude Encoder Replaced
Added Aileron Bottom Gap Seals
Replaced Aileron Top Seal
Canopy Seal Replaced
Static Overhaul
New Alternate Static Valve
Inspected Flaps
Serviced Fuel
Added Trailing Cone to the alternate static port
Planned Flight Profile
Engine Start
Take Off
Initial climb 100 KIAS
First Power Reduction WOT/2500
Climb 125 KIAS to '10.5K MSL
45° Flap Extension at 90 KIAS HQ CHK
45° to 100 KIAS HQ Chk
45° to VSO, HQ Chk
3x Flaps up-Gear Down Stalls (Ship Static)
3x Flaps up-Gear Down Stalls (Cone Static)
3x Flaps 35°-Gear Down Stalls (Ship Static)
3x Flaps 35°-Gear Down Stalls (Cone Static)
3x Flaps 45°-Gear Down Stalls (Ship Static)
3x Flaps 45°-Gear Down Stalls (Cone Static)
GPS Cloverleaf at 1.3 VS
GPS Cloverleaf at 1.3 VS35°
GPS Cloverleaf at 1.3 VS0
RTB
Normal approach
Flaps up landing (110 KIAS)
Bailout altitude: Out of control below 5,000
If less than 50% of control remaining RTB
If we can't fly at or below 120 KIAS with more than 10% of control remaining, bail out.
Squawks:
Recommend different engine monitor with more display area
Recommend different airspeed indicator w/ only knots
Recommend different airspeed indicator ~40 Knots
Brakes Soft
2800 RPM prop governor setting
Idle 1,000-1,200 RPM
Throttle/Mixture moves with gear retraction
Running Rough?
Left Elevator Gap Seal came off
Cylinder #4 the hottest (410°F Peak)
Next Steps:
Consider new static location adequate, remove trailing cone. Consider slow-speed handling and minimum speed adequate until verified with landing tests. Need to understand the cruise speed performance hit with the VGs, and consider removing these devices until the correct balance of high and low-speed performance is reached.