Flare of War - Tomahawk Missile

This video explains the strengths and construction of Tomahawk missiles.
It consists of the missile guidance device Image-Infrared Seeker, Inertial Navigation System (INS), Terrain Contour Matching, Digital Scene Matching Area Correlation, engine, and more.
I hope this video will help you understand the Tomahawk missile.
#military #tomahawk #missiles #weapons #mscope

[@fridaycaliforniaa236]

Just to be clear : the TERCOM doesn't use the real heights or altitudes. It uses the height variations along the way to compare with a digital map stored in memory to "guess" if the missile follows the good path to its target. Other interesting fact : for ship-launched tomahawks, it was not uncommon that the missile first reached a pre-programmed GPS waypoint, then used its stored ground maps to fly to its target (ships move, you can't be sure the missile will always start right on a well known place or will fly on a portion of terrain already stored in its memory). So for Gulf War, the paths the missile followed where sometimes really surprising (often a straight line to the GPS waypoint, then the normal preprogrammed turns and trajectory to the target).

[@19MAD95]

So you’re saying the missile knows where it is because it knows where it isn’t?

[@8bitfrenzy376]

The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is - whichever is greater - it obtains a difference or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position that it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is is now the position that it wasn't, and if follows that the position that it was is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information that the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it know where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice versa. And by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

[@BlueRice]

there's alot of thing he didnt covered, like a software similar to AI. they have it back then, it can scan objects like building, cars, tanks and what not to random target . if they set way point on routes it can fly endless loop until you command it only to attack tanks. when the missiles detect the tanks it will automatically target it. they have this tech over 25 years ago. impressive.

[@krzysztof6123]

Great video reminiscent of MIlitary history in a minute

[@БолатБиркенов]

This is a great racket, it's really strong, we need it 👍👍👍👍😯

[@peacekeeper9687]

I like your videos, It is very interesting keep making such kind of videos 👍

[@muhacnt7988]

Looking forward to more contents

[@Fr3ddyFazbear87]

Contents lol

[@muhacnt7988]

@@Fr3ddyFazbear87 nogga what

[@Fr3ddyFazbear87]

He always said everything with a S on the end

[@muhacnt7988]

@@Fr3ddyFazbear87 Beacause he gonna be pumping out more of these beautiful videos

[@Fr3ddyFazbear87]

@@muhacnt7988 calm down

[@jameshailerthepostmaster4389]

I didn't realize The Bismarck can launch Tomahawk Missile.

[@NonEuclideanTacoCannon]

I thought the unit cost sounded low so I checked it out, they're actually $2 million per missile.

[@lkrxlee]

Take a shot every time the narrator says 'Tomahawk' 🍻

[@KG72740]

Why do these military channels always seem to dont know about the existence of „The“

[@aaceytuno]

Tarzan not know “the” , tomahawk friend, tomahawk blow up

[@ninzapou]

To save time? Lol

[@abinaslimbu3057]

Criut body boot iron man Modern jet fighter Iron man mark 1

[@emgee0312]

TTS script made by non native english speaker probably

[@SeanCMonahan]

​@@emgee0312Yes, the creator of this channel is Korean. At first, I was put off by the computerized voice. There are so many BS channels around posting AI-generated or straight-up stolen "content," so I assumed this was the same kind of stuff. I'm glad I realized this channel is different! They are actually creating informative content. Their animations are excellent, and they seem to be open to constructive criticism when people have pointed out errors or incorrect details in the animations.

[@alfonsovelasco9627]

You ARE an artist !!

[@Tiagomottadmello]

Great, great vídeo !!! 👍🏻👍🏻

[@silencerstudent9381]

Your videos are next level good

[@bobparvin9773]

Thanks to Texas instruments and Raytheon,. We got the best they is.

[@rokpertrovic940]

So you can destroy the world? Most genocide nation in the world you killed 100

[@rokpertrovic940]

You killed 10000000 indians are you proud american??

[@Cookboy3857]

Nice amazing tamahowk

[@michaelfleischer9795]

Top Super Animationen...👍

[@johnzehrbach820]

I do no know where the author got the some missed by 80 m deviation info, but to date the tomahawk is over 96% mission success meaning it hit the target close enough to destroy it. Better than any other guided missile of any type, although the TOW is close and now the Javelin.

[@nestor1208]

The author said it was before the modifications for guidance were made. Thus after the modifications, the missile became much better, elevating the percentage of successful missions

[@josephastier7421]

The Tomahawk has more in common with a fighter jet than either of those missiles.

[@JohnLedford]

Great video! Do you do your own 3D work and animations?

[@blameusa7082]

when you know stuff, but cant say stuff 😎😎

[@jasons44]

Dude I like your mind

[@GearTiger007]

very nice ! hope to see more tech about the more style of guide system

[@SolarWebsite]

The missile knows where it is because it knows where it isn't.

[@rael5469]

B.S. It knows where it is because it receives GPS.

[@borisdorofeev5602]

I knew someone would have commented this.

[@BIG-DIPPER-56]

Very good - thank you ! ! 🙂😎👍

[@HeavensBladeTM]

Jesus I love this missile ! I fantasize about her !!

[@JG-dt2ub]

Tactical sling shots are the future

[@luckytiger5551]

Brilliant!

[@raymondyee2008]

Pc games like “688i Hunter Killer”, “Sub Command” and “Dangerous Waters” let’s you command the use of Tomahawk missiles.

[@Pinkielover]

One missile could feed me for the rest of my life and house me

[@ddegn]

There aren't many edible parts of a Tomahawk. I don't think you should try eating one. Tomahawks missiles would make a really cramped house even if you removed things from the inside. I don't think you'd have a good life living in a Tomahawk while also eating a Tomahawk.

[@dad-ms8mz]

He is talking about if he sells one🤣

[@samu_cornia9991]

@@dad-ms8mz yeah he's joking headass

[@Slava_Yarmolenko]

A missile knows where it is...

[@josephastier7421]

...and where it isn't.

[@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723]

V1: Kid I'm proud of you!

[@srdjanvujosevic88]

1:10, how many Tomahawks were used in Yugoslavian War?

[@AlfredHedgehog-v2t]

2:20 ultimate NANI moment

[@LithiumDeuteride-6]

Russia also has its own tomahawks, it was created as an almost exact copy, only a little simpler and cheaper.

[@MM22966]

Is that anything like Russia having its own stealth fighter and own 5th-gen tank?

[@NebulaTornado]

Tomahawk It's the best American weapon before drones, but what about Kalibre from Russia? Can we compare to it?

[@BennyOrgi]

No. There are thousands and tenthousands of tomahawk systems available. If kalibre there are only a few dozen in store. Much likely no more anymore, because their production depends on western components, Russia won't be able to buy anymore. So jo, they are from a logistics and military point of view, not comparable. One is a real threat to nations. The other one is only a poor chance, to scare people who don't know about military industrial complexes.

[@NN-rk4mn]

8:30 I didn't sew you mention Bombing of Serbia in 1999. Over 350 tomahavk were lunched..

[@MacksCurley]

It would take most people on the planet a life time to earn enough to buy a Tomahawk missile yet the Tomahawk missile exists to be destroyed and destroy life times.

[@johnzehrbach820]

About $2M now.

[@nevajno2741]

IT EXISTS NOT TO KILL PEOPLE, BUT TO DESTROY THE TERRORISTS AND ENEMIES OF THE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY (IF THERE'S OIL IN SOME FOREIGN COUNTRY OR IT DONT WANT TO RECOGNIZE USA DOMINATION, THEN ITS AN OPRESSIVE STATE SUPRESSING DEMOCRACY). TOMAHAWK IS LITERALLY BRINGING DEMOCRACY AND FREEDOM TO ANOTHER COUNTRIES - MORE TOMAHAWKS = MORE DEMOCRACY AND LESS COMMUNISM

[@MacksCurley]

@@nevajno2741 What rock are you living under?

[@nevajno2741]

@@MacksCurley UNDER MURICAN ROCK, BEST ROCK ON THE PLANET 💪 MURICAAA, F... YEEEEEAHH 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅🦅🗽🗽🗽

[@marcos0055101]

Enemies*

[@pilotmanpaul]

Middle Easterners watching this: _So, about stopping one from hitting my city?_

[@WalkaCrookedLine]

DSMAC as used in the first Gulf War was a visible light system. Which leads to the question how could the onboard cameras "see" at night. As I heard it explained by a naval officer, the missile actually had a giant flashbulb to light the scene. In my imagination I have this picture of some sleepy Iraqi soldier spotting these flashes, maybe two or three in sequence, and a few seconds later, BOOM. Flare of war indeed.

[@BlueRice]

that i didnt know, wouldnt it be better having infrared light?

[@WalkaCrookedLine]

@@BlueRice Apparently so, as I understand it later updates switched to an infrared based system.

[@secularsunshine9036]

*Let the Sunshine in.*

[@jonswindells2728]

So what's the name of the missile again?????

[@TheMrGREENRay]

axe

[@jonswindells2728]

@@TheMrGREENRay Thought so. Thanks for clearing that up.

[@georgieippolito9924]

anyone know where i can get the jet engine for the tomahawk? ( Williams International F107-WR-402 turbofan) the engine would be a perfect fit for my hang glider and has a whopping of 900 pounds of thrust! i could soar through the sky with that baby

[@fridaycaliforniaa236]

Meanwhile it's a "one use only" engine. Most of the time, it has no bearings, only cheap or weak mechanical parts (gears, etc), just a few control wires and electronic sensors (it's often designed to stay full throttle only), limited amounts of lubricant (or even sometimes no lubricant at all, just some kind of "permanent/long life" grease or polymer bearings). For example, on the French Exocet anti-ship missile, lubrication is done by the fuel itself ! The cooling system is often primitive too. Some cruise missile engines only start with an explosive cartridge, also. Your engine would only last 8~12 hours before being worn to a non return point or having it eating its internals XD. Just my assumptions, I was in the French Navy. Tiny engines for our cruise missiles were not meant to be "long life" items. They just had to be able to wait many years in a crate/casing before being intensively used once for a few hours run. (Sorry if my english is crap ^^)

[@georgieippolito9924]

@@fridaycaliforniaa236 im still interested. i could replace the bearings with ceramic bearings and work on the lubrication parts if i have to. i would be a dream come true with a lightweight jet engine mounted on my hang glider especially my sports glider

[@tianchi4423]

Get an RC jet engine. Those actually last.

[@georgieippolito9924]

@@tianchi4423 ill check it out. don't think there strong enough though.

[@wally7856]

@@georgieippolito9924 Search for "KINGTECH K450G4+" - 99lbs of thrust, should be more then enough for a hang glider.

[@BrianWilliamDoty]

Man! The thing can hit you from 1500 miles away...

[@marlounyunson8740]

what powers the tomahawk? a very small jet engine? with a range 2500 km? what is the fuel?

[@thomasmyers9128]

Engine: Turbofan Fuel: Turbofan fuel (AV gas)

[@marlounyunson8740]

@@thomasmyers9128 WOW!!! Thanks!

[@stalkinghawk9244]

Does anyone know the soothing music used in the middle of the video?

[@GandaraVideos]

Tomahawk missiles are also expensive to construct.

[@4lpina]

2:29 It's American missile, why would it divide area into equal 100 meter sectors? Or is 100 meter just a coincidence?

[@ablasttv]

Engineers use metric even in America.

[@garrysekelli6776]

Wasnt it a tomahawk that struck the pentagon on sept 11 2001?

[@josephastier7421]

Yes, however it was full of chemtrail mixture, and altered everybody's perception so they *think* it was a hijacked passenger jet.

[@charlesmiles9115]

😛😛😛😛😛❤❤❤❤👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@ronaldwhite1730]

Thank you . ( 2022 / June / 11 )

[@Cameron_the_Robot]

To fly stably. Always make sure to fly Stably.

[@alessandrofirmani700]

Woooow

[@snowdrop9810]

6:06 holy shit missiles have an attitude?

[@josephastier7421]

"Attitude" just means the direction that the aircraft is pointing. This is sometimes different from the direction the aircraft is moving, for instance a landing aircraft will have a nose-up attitude even though it is descending.

[@h.n.t.d7963]

I think ill just call it long range suicide drone from now on lmao

[@user-pr1sp1og6d]

Neden çeviri yapmıyor ?

[@petergibbons607]

that water mark is super annoying, maybe you can make it larger and less transparent, and maybe put it on there like 10 times all over the screen that might help

[@kjererrrt2381]

i remember how the russians downed them all with an electronic warfare system in syria when the yanks were trying to destroy an airfield. teh few missiles that did break through didn't hit anything substantial.

[@rael5469]

Propaganda lies.

[@Von_DBL]

Hypersonic missiles cannot communicate during the last phase of flight because of the comm blackout experienced by the plasma around the object. Just like space shuttles. This means that the missiles has to rely only on inertial guidance, making the accuracy very poor and potential success low considering the limited warhead enclosed. This technology is not mature and will not be for a long time.

[@tommymairo8964]

So theoretically, it's a unmanned Kamikaze vehicle with more powerful dynamics 🤔 I wonder if the preprogrammed navigation path got leaked, whether the adversary could shot it down with patrolling fighter jets.

[@МаксимАртюх-к1ю]

Нам дуже потрібні такі ракети в бородьбі за свободу!

[@subram2011]

Didn’t know the past tense for strike is stroke…..

[@aandc2005]

Why don't they make a stealth version of the tomahawk.. this one is subsonic and shows up on radar even at low altitude and could be shot down.. all they would really have to do is redesign the exterior so the radar waves are deflected away and not back to the operator..

[@gvsf5946]

How much silver is in a Tomahawk missile?

[@truegret7778]

I suspect the real solution used it starting at the target and working the solution back to where it it to be launched.

[@Werepie]

This would be a great video, were it not voiced by this god-awful, overused robo-narrator.

[@marleyboy7732]

Tomahawk missles are expensive. Tomahawk missles are fast. Tomahawk missles are big. Tomahawk missle. Tomahawk.....Tomahawk......Oh and um Tomahawk.🤣

[@mackjsm7105]

The Missile DOES NOT have a IR seeker.

[@MM22966]

Crumpling your IADS with impunity since 1991....

[@iivin4233]

I'm not sure I believe tomahawks are cheaper than planes. Much more tonnage of explosives was dropped by planes in the Gulf War than was delivered by tomahawks. That doesn't necessarily prove anything but one of the more expensive aspects of a weapon that flies is the part that flies. With a tomahawk you have to build a new, admittedly small, airframe for every payload you want to launch. A plane is reusable.

[@ชัยศักดิ์สวัสดิ์ภิรมย์-ฤ7ศ]

Looking forward 😃

[@dpatel2747]

how blade drone work make video

[@knight5959]

can you tell what type of animation software you are using

[@Klarpimier]

But does Tomahawk Missile know where it is?

[@nesseihtgnay9419]

The US also invented the cruise missile

[@pernykvist3442]

They was shot down over Syria. So wonder if a next generation is under production, with EMP shield and stealth abillity?

[@EC-it2fx]

$0.57 million per Tomahawk missile

[@ntnurdu4532]

Pakistan also have this missile and after upgrades it's become more dangerous than USA tomohok ... It's have longer range and can fire form surface,air and sea.. know as Pakistan,s Babur 1, Babur 2 and Babur 3

[@someguy4915]

'tomohok' Lmao you can't even properly spell it's name.

[@nilalohitadey9246]

But ballistic missile can hit target very very far like 10000 km that is why icbm are better than other tipe of missile

[@stevejobs1653]

Why did he say the word Tomahawk so few times??

[@PZantanKilla]

Cause he get paid everytime he said that.

[@pauligel9117]

@@PZantanKilla *why this missile is so рrasize, that it could hit Рutins asshole in Kremlin*

[@TheMrGREENRay]

8:21 Yugoslavia in 1999 (nowaday Serbia territory)

[@mohamedm.el-sawymd2325]

كل الصواريخ التي اطلقت استخدمت ضد بلاد عربية اسلامية ... لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله ...

[@arefkr]

It's not the Gulf War. It is the Persian Gulf war.

[@rchristie5401]

only 20 years late

[@deykiidey6495]

Your f16 price shown in this vide is inaccurate because real f 16 cost 63 million dollars.

[@ToBeIsWasWere]

bro why do you only speak singular

[@kiloton1920]

450kg warhead? Ouch

[@christophercharles9645]

Very good video but what's up with the narration? Very stiff and some weird grammar choices - like not using "the" half the time where applicable.

[@giovanni4151]

stop repeating 3000 time the subject name. it's annoyng

[@pradeepsahu4121]

Tell about sophisticated Hydrogen bomb W88

[@meatballs9453]

Count how many times he says tomahawk 😢

[@marcelhannotte7624]

Hmm the Missile powerful enough to blow up my house from 1/2 way across the world seems to cost more then my house or what ever you plan on blowing up. RIP tax dollars.

[@rabidpeanut3703]

Why does it sound like Tomahawk is speaking in the third person like elmo? English.

[@loadofstuff10]

Robot voice..

[@arawan5anothai054]

Ok

[@notagudartistbutiamtrying1854]

Mscope makes videos. Mscope make video about missile. Mscope not use word The.

[@quantico_x9320]

Nice???

[@BVasquezp]

The beginning of the suicide drones

[@Kopan-uy67iih]

Так и не понял ничего.

[@AnkitSharma-qb8mi]

Have you heard about brahmos cruise missile 😌💪🏻🇮🇳

[@PZantanKilla]

When you launch that trash...it goes straight to pakistan, hitting empty space lol.

[@batman4y2k]

Are you trying to say "bathroom"?

[@PussyCruiser]

You really want to compare Indian bathroom with Tomahawk?

[@batman4y2k]

@@PussyCruiser meh, it's a meme, I don't want to get into it here, it's kinda nsfw

[@PussyCruiser]

@@batman4y2k I was writing to that Indian. Also heard about Indian bathroom missile.

[@johnpennington7107]

The speed needs to be upgraded to match the rest of the world and has to be able to go around defense system to hit their targets.

[@mrthunderhawk]

No it doesn’t, first: Tomahawk is build for relative low speed to not attract to much attention (sonic boom) Second: A missile going supersonic is harder to build Third: She wasn’t designed for this kind of mission. It was prolly build for quantity over speed, so like: If I can bring in one missile fast enough to not be shot down, can I do the same by bringing several in the area for less money? Also. To avoid shootdowns it would have to go hypersonic because of Defense missiles going mach 5 and over

[@gromxxx]

As a rule supersonic missiles have shorter range due to solid fuel engine or larger jet engine that consumes too much fuel increasing the size, weight and needing larger platforms. Russian Granit or Vulcan missiles weigh 7 tons each with 600-1000km range and a massive heat signature seen from space.

[@mrthunderhawk]

@@gromxxx well, if you argue like this, you have to say that the longe the „boost“ is, so to say the acceleration, you achieve speed and with it range. Am I thinking right?

[@gromxxx]

@@mrthunderhawk in order to sustain supersonic speed through the entire flight path of the missile you need to engine to work throughout consuming massive amounts of fuel. Beyond cruise speed the fuel necessary to sustain the flight rises exponentially hence the weight and size of those missiles.

[@mure.13]

العراق ايكول انة شعلية

[@nigelT16]

Although very technologically impressive, leave it to humans to put this much time and $$ into death and destruction

[@Luke_______]

Isn't it awesome!!!