Flat Earther Crybaby Ragequits

Buy my book here! store.bookbaby.com/book/ratio...
Support me on Patreon / planetpeterson
Check out my podcast rss.com/podcasts/planetpeterson/ or open.spotify.com/show/66AQMFf...
Support me on Venmo: account.venmo.com/u/Eric-Pete...
Be sure to follow me on social media!
Instagram: / planetpeterson
TikTok: @planet_peterson

[@thanksalotAndy]

It really doesn't matter what evidence or facts you tell a flerf as they will ignore it unless it fits their cultist views.

[@stringtheorysucks]

I would suggest looking at McToon’s laws of flerf. It describes how they think very well.

[@heiyuall]

Aggressive ignorance comes from awareness of failure. Earth is spherical. The end.

[@madara211000]

Honestly it'd probably be easier to tell him that "8in/mi^2" makes a parabola and ask him if he thinks the Earth is shaped like a parabola.

[@freddan6fly]

*paraboloid (in 3d space, otherwise correct)

[@gowdsake7103]

who knows with a flattard

[@Bunny99s]

While this is true, this is pretty irrelevant as this approximation is extremely accurate for the first few hundred miles and we don't see that far anyways. However you can actually use the 8in/mi² when you use it "twice". So first you use your observer height, use the formula to calculate the distance of your horizon. This distance now need to be subtracted from the distance to the object and then you use the formula again for the remaining distance. Both of these lines will be tangents to the earth and touch the earth at your horizon. Though this would still just be an approximation because you will have a hard time to account for refraction this way.

[@lubrew5862]

@@freddan6flyNo, it’s a 2D formula. Yes the Earth and reality is in 3D, but formula is is 2 dimensional

[@RanEncounter]

​@@lubrew5862 So what? The rotational object is still a paraboloid. You seem to not understand how it is used.

[@LanceHall]

How does the dude NOT know that engineers that build long bridges over water HAVE to factor Earth curvature? We have photos of long bridges showing the curvature.

[@Nubifier]

I'm always surprised no one ever brings up LIGO. LIGO's arms are long enough that the curvature of the Earth was a factor in their construction. Over the 4 km length of each arm, the Earth curves away by nearly a meter.

[@mikehunt4503]

“P1000 you’re getting rekt noob” what a line. (Comments)

[@alejandrovallejo4330]

When flerts ask you about how far should the boat be for it to start to be obscured by the curve of the earth you should always ask “what is your refraction”? Or say “geometrically it would be X distance, but it varies with refraction”.

[@rylanasher4756]

I was thinking this too. What are the refractive conditions? It would cripple his little mind... I mean, more than it is.

[@alejandrovallejo4330]

@@rylanasher4756 indeed 😂. That or he would start complaning about “Oh you guys always use refraction to save yourselves” because flerts just can’t fathom it no matter how many times they are told 😂.

[@rylanasher4756]

@@alejandrovallejo4330 Flatties gonna flat 😂 they really are something special.

[@rylanasher4756]

@alejandrovallejo4330 Also, I love that Witless is on record pontificating about refraction "always being a necessary thing to take account of in all optical observations." Yet he will always drop measurements that lack refraction information. Gotta lie to flerf.

[@alejandrovallejo4330]

@@rylanasher4756 yeah exactly, it’s actually so telling that flerts don’t even see his blatant hypocrisy and contradictions 😂

[@marknelson4615]

So, if I heard that correctly at 1:18, he asks if you are 17 feet off a 100 foot beach ball, how far are you from it? Well, numbskull, you’re 17 feet from it. He can’t even formulate a question correctly.

[@JohnnyD_cm]

The same as "If a triangle has sides 1, 1 and 1, how many sides does a triangle have?" and they'd still get it wrong or go off on a tangent 😂😂😂

[@Robbie_the_Rabbit]

When these idiots say "the simple fact of" it's usually not a simple fact of anything.

[@NoodleGoblin]

Him trying so hard to run at the end is hilarious

[@ericzh9984]

I'm just laughing that P1000 named himself after that stupid camera that flerfers are so obsessed with

[@LuigiMordelAlaume]

There was a really cool art piece at burning man in like 2015 that was a mile long line of posts every 10 feet over a mile with two red lights on the post blinking. The top light on each post was the tangent line of earth's curve and the bottom light on each post was exactly the same elevation from the dirt over the mile. It was super cool to actually see the slight curve over the mile of red blinking lights. The location of burning man is an almost perfectly level dried lake bed so it worked well.

[@Robbie_the_Rabbit]

I like mathematically getting my math out.

[@drdave8607]

May I suggest an even simpler pizza-destroyer? Spinning stars over there + spinning stars over there = Ball (Spinning stars over there and only over there = Pizza)

[@seraphinaaizen6278]

He wanted to do his mathematical gish-gallop, and he was totally disinterested in anything that would get him off script.

[@dansmith7009]

The simplest proof that 8 inches per mile squared doesn’t actually work on a sphere, that EVERYONE should be able to understand, is using an example of something halfway around the world. So something 12.5k miles, would have 104k feet hidden from it, according to that bad approximation, (but you don’t even need t do the math, just ask them if the result is literally infinity). However, obviously, something could be infinitely tall going directly away from us, and would never stop being blocked from view by the earth.

[@gryph01]

What is wrong with this guy?

[@GunnerHeatFire]

This can be asked in most of these videos.

[@planetpeterson2824]

Whatever it is, I'm sure it's really hard to pronounce

[@freddan6fly]

"What is wrong with this guy?" Brainwashed flerf that failed school and took meth, when I took math.

[@doranku]

He has the Flerpies

[@tremas3329]

Should have called the video "The Amazing Expanding Beachball!". Went from i believe he said 17ft, then 24, up to 100 now and just half way through the video. Im also wondering if that '15 mile lake' he mentioned is more like a mud puddle and he just inflated that as well.

[@greggieg]

So, when did Demock start calling himself "P1000"?

[@bunnykiller]

if the earth was flat, one would eventually see the entire surface of the earth from extreme altitude, but as it turns out only 1 "side" ( half of a sphere) of the earth is visible.... but of course now they have to deny getting to that altitude is impossible... that space doesnt exist, but yet we have meteor impacts all over the earth and meteors that can be handled and examined that came from space...

[@tysongalloway5700]

“YOU’RE TWELVE!”

[@illusion180976]

@Peterson Where did you find @DollarStoreTommyLeeJones?

[@heiyuall]

The flerf community is only cons and cultists. This one so pathetically dodged questions and self promoted that he’s most likely just a con. And a bit of a troll, but that’s all cons anyway.

[@TheLevantin]

The flat earth community consists of only two types of people: people who want to sell t-shirts and people who want to buy t-shirts. That's all

[@johntrip07]

The second you start insulting, you’ve already lost the debate.

[@ROFT]

"Get from nasa" - yeah that's why we can't build bridges and other engineering projects in the UK, or under the channel, because we don't have nasa. Isambard Kingdom Brunel tried building things but nasa said that when they began to exist they wouldn't help him.

[@CeezGeez]

lol flerfer gets cornered and runs away oh boy

[@doranku]

Demog, he actually is calm and resonable in this video, relative to his normal unhinged behavior.

[@danpettinger1353]

Pretty sure it's Demmoch, but either way it's def him but slightly less psychotic.

[@doranku]

@@danpettinger1353 Apparently it is Demmoch indeed.

[@scorptrio8231]

I bet that the theists are mad because flatearthers stole their "most stupid people on the internet" prize.

[@GunnerHeatFire]

Trust me, if you search far and wide, you will find people with less intelligence than theist and flerfers, they may be the white whale but they exist.

[@ThorsDecree]

implying most flerfs aren't theists lol

[@tremas3329]

I always laugh when I hear a Creationist trash talk Flat Earth. The fact that Flat Earthers are often also Creationists is just the cherry on top. The "Let them fight!" meme plays through my mind every time.

[@user-mr2do5vr1v]

8inches per mile squared also doesnt take observer height OR refraction into account. Thats why we dont use it

[@andrewkeith4332]

What a sad existence. Lmao 😂 but i guess im not surprised anymore. If a person believes this garbage? Then honestly they really arent capable of much else as far as critical thinking goes.

[@BaronVonQuiply]

03:20 It's real easy, Em7, G, D, A7sus4 (play normal open position chords but keep the 3rd fret on the high E and B strings ringing out)

[@kaweckipiotr]

He was demoh one day. He’s insane

[@RealJiffyCones]

This sounds like Demmoch, but it can't be because this guy stops talking.

[@Mxxx-ii9bu]

And no cursing.

[@peterwyetzner5276]

@@Mxxx-ii9bu I had the same thought, but I'm pretty sure it is him.

[@Mxxx-ii9bu]

The more I listened the more I came to believe it was Demmoch. The dude is such a POS.

[@Skullgoroth666]

Keep track of the questions he won't answer

[@DorianSwain]

this was PURE COMEDY 😭😭

[@zwarst]

We live in a virtual realm, and the map (coordinate system) is stereographic. The plane of Earth is fixed & immovable. There is no curvature, no gravity, no dome, and no ice wall... Earth has 4 corners and 2 polar rotations. All of the luminaries in the sky are being rendered locally to each individual observer's circle of sight (eyes, cameras, etc.)... The only working map and model of REALITY - Stereographic Map by Awake Souls.

[@lemongavine]

Please ask one of your flat earth guests what the earth would look like if it actually was a gigantic sphere

[@louseveryann2181]

And this yokel is allowed to vote....

[@KiNKnives]

8" per mile² is drop , not curvature

[@dansmith7009]

It’s also an approximation, not drop. The simplest proof of it, is that if you have an object on the exact opposite side of a sphere, it can be infinitely tall, and still be completely obscured. 8” per mile squared never reaches infinity, therefore is not an accurate calculation, just a rough approximation that matches up over relatively short distances.

[@lubrew5862]

@@dansmith7009It is both. It is a decent approximation for tangential drop. Yes it is limited

[@TheWileGuy]

For accurate long distance results you need to factor in the refraction index. Flerfs never account for this and don't record what it was when they set up these photo shoots. I don't doubt they purposefully ignore all the times at the same location where the refraction index is normal and they don't see near as far. Areas over bodies of water, their favorite locations, have a higher variation of refraction index due to a multitude of factors like temperature, humidity, atmospheric pressure, etc.

[@williamcozart8158]

LOL is that guy's name P-1000?

[@bosunbones.8815]

Lake observations. Lets see what Bob the Science Guy has to say. :D

[@lubrew5862]

Bob the Science Guy is good. I also like MCToon.

[@alkaline8608]

thumbnail was diabolical

[@ElvisPresleyTouchedMe]

I like to go with personal experience. Have been in South Africa. During the Summer the sun rises and sets super…like super fast near the equator because of relative rotational speeds on a globe. On a frisbee planet the sun would have to physically move faster through the sky (is it 30,000 ft they say?) for places near the equator, than nearer the poles. At the same time.

[@BrendaCreates]

Is that Demmoch? Sounds like him.

[@StephenJarvis-pi5zu]

Brenda it sounds like him, the same guy who said if you drilled a hole diagonally through the dirt would you see the stars

[@corringhamdepot4434]

Without knowing the actual elevation of his lake, you cannot calculate the exact curvature of the surface of the lake. If you want to be nitpicking. 🤣 Curvature calculators work on a theoretical average.

[@freddan6fly]

I corrected you and my comment got wiped. Eight miles per miles squared is the formula in 3d space for a paraboloid.

[@ThorsDecree]

Your comment is still there. You just can't see it on mobile. IDK why but YT hides some comments so that you can only see them on the desktop website. Even sorting by time instead of likes doesn't show it. Your comment 43 minutes ago was "*paraboloid (in 3d space, otherwise correct)" just so you know I'm not pulling your leg (and for any mobile users I guess lol).

[@freddan6fly]

@@ThorsDecree T.Y. I am double checking with an incognito tab on PC and it still didn't show up. I did not use any trigger words so I was really baffled.

[@ThorsDecree]

@@freddan6fly I think around the same time that Google changed their predictive text to an AI system coincided with an increase in mysteriously disappearing comments. Maybe they're trying something new that takes less resources to operate? Who knows.

[@freddan6fly]

@@ThorsDecree It is the closest thing to supernatural we'll ever get.

[@ThorsDecree]

@@freddan6fly lmao "YT works in mysterious ways"

[@JanRautiainen]

It ended up as usual.

[@lubrew5862]

There is almost always more refraction over large bodies of water. Hence why flerfers love to use observations over them and leave out any info needed to determine the laps rate. Hence this guy didn’t even bring up atmospheric conditions with his lake example..

[@StephenJarvis-pi5zu]

Democh Alert

[@chrispysaid]

it is infuriating to me how you don't simply make the statement that earth curve calculators DO NOT use 8 inches per mile squared as their curvature calculation, and that you saying not to use 8IPMS isn't the same as you saying not to use earth curve calculators it's such a simple distinction to make and this guy wouldn't be able to keep going back to "so you wanna take earth curve calculators off the table?" because everyone *else* knows that's not what you said but this guy won't stop harping on it

[@Eliah-v2h]

You are proud of that?.. you call that a rage quit?...that was mad childish...you just cannot handle the truth

[@Bloink]

Can you please stop displaying your "stuff" to an invisible out-of-frame camera? I know I come off as an asshole but good GOD, you've had MONTHS to realise this now and you're still doing it. 5:05 is the second time this video alone. This, while sounding like a broken robot... Anyways, subscribe guys, and buy the book😂 Damn, this is Lemmino-levels, right? At LEAST 3%, and that's great!

[@andrewyanke1787]

Man your water bottle drinking is obnoxious. Your volume picks up too much and your gulping makes people like me wanna gag. You gotta fix this dude. I gotta jump out before you drink again.

[@danielhamid5569]

My favourite debunk uses the undersea internet cables from Sydney to Fiji, and separately Sydney to New Zealand. Flerf math basically doubles the required cabling, actual math is slightly wrong because extra has to be allowed for the ocean floors ever changing altitudes, but not by much. Flerfs are simple idiots.

[@scorptrio8231]

Flatards goinna be flatarded in flatardia.