Flat Earther Owns Himself Trying to Debunk Flat Earth Memes

** Get Surfshark VPN at Surfshark.deal... and enter promo code SCIMANDAN for 83% off and 3 extra months free! **
What happens when a Flat Earther tries to debunk flat Earth memes? He ties himself up in knots and makes a right hash of it. Let's watch Phuket Word have a go shall we...
Thanks for watching.
Here is the new website. Please do check it out: scimandan.co.uk/
Also, if you want access to behind the scenes photos and videos, chat groups and more then check out my recently revamped Patreon page. Take a look and join a new tier if you want some extra perks:
/ scimandan
Dan's opinions shared in this video are supported by verified facts (whether scientific or general) and they should be treated as just that: opinions. All critique and humour are addressed to the words and actions of individuals and not to the individuals themselves, under the Act of Free Speech.
#flatearth #fail #memes

[@bumblefluff79]

He reminds me of my 2 year old totally engrossed in his stories while holding the book upside down.

[@nickryan3417]

Your 2 year old probably understands the shape of the Earth better than him.

[@theultimatereductionist7592]

Careful. Your 2-year-old just might be Australian.

[@sandrajohnson8071]

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@darksynthphony2242]

I dont think he looks as cute as your 2-year-old while he does.

[@TaterFarmer]

Hilarious 🤣

[@csimet]

I'll keep repeating what I've said before... they can believe anything they want, but they vote and breed. That is what scares me.

[@stinkyham9050]

And drive on public roads

[@andrewburrell4514]

And use up oxygen - which they can't see, and we don't see them getting upset about oxygen - but, then again, there aren't any fe videos about oxygen.

[@tomstamford6837]

And they could be living next door to you, they could be educating your child or worse still, they could be your doctor. Don't laugh, I have met, worked, with highly educated, professional people, who are scientists to boot, but who you would cross the street to avoid if you knew what nonsense they believed in.

[@daerdevvyl4314]

csimet At the moment, flat earthers don't seem to affecting anything except driving some people nuts with their videos. They're irritating but basically harmless. I'd worry more about people with real power in government or business who can actually affect your life. Now you might say "but they vote for people I hate!" In answer to that I'd refer you to the many videos of people getting questions wrong about basic things like the number of months in a year for example. Generally the subjects of these videos are young, urban and racially diverse. In other words they probably tend to vote differently than flat earthers. And it demonstarates that both sides have numbskulls.

[@jimmypee8404]

They should at least be sterilised.

[@robertmesser557]

The whole ‘gravity doesn’t exist, it’s just density’ argument makes me laugh every time. It’s like saying ‘computers aren’t real, I explain that on my KZbin channel!’. He is just another graduate of Dunning-Kruger University.

[@bfure1]

I've never heard a good response to this question. If it is density, and not gravity, then if I was to drop a hammer and feather in a vacuum chamber, they should drop at seperate rates, because the hammer is denser than the feather, and they are both in a 0 density environment with no air resistance. Gravity explains this perfectly, and we have predicted and replicated results time and time again, so how come it doesn't work with density.

[@robertmesser557]

@@bfure1 you are of course quite correct. Flat earther models fail in SO many ways. One even claimed that what we call gravity is actually the ‘flat earth’ moving upwards at 9.8m/a/s! Their models for a localized sun and moon fall flat as well… they adjust for one variable, and the others go out the window. Flat earthers are a bunch of stubborn anti-science morons who wear their ignorance like a banner.

[@christiancasaverdepertica1802]

@@bfure1 The vacuum is a paid actor, duh

[@ignisvis8867]

@bfure1 a simpler experiment would be putting water and air in a closed jar. If the position of the water is caused by density and not gravity, it shouldn't move when you turn the jar

[@bfure1]

@@ignisvis8867 yeah, but they will just respond that density makes it go down, which is stupid, but that experiment won't show that to them sadly.

[@simonjohn9525]

I love his selective use of personal observations and physics: he agrees with them when they agree with his argument but are totally disregarded if they show his argument to be wrong.

[@assininecomment1630]

He doesn't even understand the ones he claims (or tries) to agree with. How was it ever going to be less than hilarious/painful for us, to hear him explain why the ones he doesn't understand OR agree with _can't_ be true. 😆

[@kenchristie9214]

The spirit level is satire directed at flat earthers and Phuket is too stupid to recognise that.

[@skarpheinnsmundsson9741]

And that is flerfism in a nutshell.

[@demo2823]

Yeah, I picked up when he said that we say water changes in behaviour on a larger scale (which we don't even say), but he won't let aeroplanes and trains be applied to a moving Earth on a larger scale because we go in circles. The train in town goes in circles too and nobody's falling out their seats because it's constant and gradual.

[@stephenhood2948]

Confirmation bias at its finesst.

[@BoltActionResolve]

Sometimes I can't finish watching these. These people talk in such nonsense that my brain hurts trying to follow their logic. Keep up the good work Dan.

[@ElementofKindness]

Friends don't let friends become flerfs.

[@Sighman]

Same. I don't think I've ever reached the end of one. I just get annoyed.

[@jasleav3968]

i was so glad to see this comment. I feel the exact same way. i cant finish a lot of them because it just drives me mad to hear these people talk such complete nonsense,

[@AndyCutright]

I am driven to contemplate violence listening to these folks.

[@Isaac_Flat_Earth]

If solar system is true, then Venus should not be visible in the night sky. But it is visible, because earth is flat and motionless, everything revolves above us. Solar system is a lie.

[@Ludi_Chris]

We need a TV show were groups of Flat Earthers race to try and find the edge of the Earth. - The Click

[@cptmalcolmreynolds3623]

He literally proved each meme was correct! Lol

[@shaihulud4515]

When I was 13 (about three decades ago...), my grandfather predicted: "Man is going to be more and more stupid, because stupidity prevails in a world which will reveal itself to be more and more complex. We just deny complexitiy, because it is easier to follow easy minds who tell us what to think, and presumably have easy answers for us. In a few years, everyone will have his own answers and live in a world of his own." RIP, grandpa - I think at least I begin to understand.

[@Gardor]

Been that way forever tbh, thats the literal definition of religion. An easy answer, an easy way out.

[@Ulford]

Wise man...

[@mobrocket]

Stupid people pop out more kids than smart/ educated people do

[@cats2927]

Persona 5

[@shaihulud4515]

@@cats2927 Persona 5? Care to elaborate?

[@erikdefeijter1777]

Just let this sink in: a guy trying to seriously debate some random memes and losing. Mind-blowing…

[@erikdefeijter1777]

@@flat_earth_forever Hahahaha, I love you man. You’re so funny!

[@AdaTheWatcher]

@flat_earth_forever have you ever considered that things you use daily like your car GPS and internet would not function if the earth was flat?

[@erikdefeijter1777]

@@flat_earth_forever Yawn… this tired old bollocks. Where do you get the line about water always being level? Not in any science textbook. Water is subject to gravity, just like everything else. It therefore conforms to the earth with the gravitational force pointing to the center. Not very complicated. And the bit about pressure is even more boring. Why do you think air pressure is lower at altitude? Air molecules are also subject to gravity so there’s a gradient from sea level dropping to zero as you hit outer space. You can measure this gradient as you go up a hill. Hell, you can even feel your ears pop. That a simple enough experiment for you?

[@erikdefeijter1777]

@@flat_earth_forever oh, and sorry, can I just point out that it helps to know what you’re talking about before you start tapping away? What are you even trying to say with “zero g vacuum”? That’s not a thing. And there is no 3rd law of entropy. But other than that you’re doing well!

[@erikdefeijter1777]

@@flat_earth_forever Sure, I’ve got a few more minutes to explain to you how the world works. You’re so cute. Like a toddler trying to tell a car mechanic how a combustion engine works…

[@florianwirtz7511]

I think the balloon meme demonstrates something even funnier. He outright dismisses the well understood and researched subject of gravity (because it doesnt fit his narrative) but instantly ackknowledges the field of electrostatics although this is also a well researched and accepted part of the science that he is choosing to discredit.

[@DeathBYDesign666]

It's also important to note that there are aspects of both subjects that we do not have a full understanding of, like the actual mechanism of the pull that both exert. There are quantum functions that have so far not been forthcoming with easy answers, it's also possible that there is some correlation between these separate attractive forces and that finding an answer to one might lead to answers for the other. Accepting that there are things we don't know, even about subjects that are fairly well understood is common in physics, it doesn't mean you get to fill in the blanks with utter nonsense.

[@nasapayrollsystem8701]

And the water inside the balloon , is round..

[@reggiedixon2]

@@DeathBYDesign666 It is simple, you just draw a Feynman diagram and say "exchange of photons" . . . .QED

[@florianwirtz7511]

@@nasapayrollsystem8701 Nah, man. Water always finds its level and level means flat. Look up the fourth or fith definition of it in the dictionary. I win Edit: I could have thought about it ( Nathan Poe sends his regards ) but this comment is meant sarcastically, I'm making fun of the ludicroius sh*t I heard on some debates with FLERFS

[@davidfaraday7963]

@@DeathBYDesign666 You could add magnetism to that list which is unexplainable using classical physics.

[@darthhunter69]

I like how they try to debunk gravity while their whole theory is based on the concept of "you would fall down a spinning ball" or "water would flow down from a spinning ball". Then they try to replace gravity with density while density only makes things sink or float because of gravity.

[@JudasMaccabeus1]

I always want to say, “water goes DOWN. The water falls off the spinning ball because the center of said spinning ball isn’t DOWN. DOWN is towards the center of the earth.” I don’t understand how they can’t figure this out. 🤦‍♂️

[@Maerahn]

FLAT-EARTHERS: "The concept of gravity is nothing but a thought experiment, there's no solid evidence for it." ALSO FLAT-EARTHERS: **unable to provide a single flat-earth model that every flat-earther can agree on.**

[@Anonymous-df8it]

@@JudasMaccabeus1 Do they have *_Down_* syndrome?

[@awesimo4684]

These guys need to take a decent scale up a skyscraper and weigh themselves at the bottom and top. The weight difference should be about a tenth of an ounce, depending on the size of the person and height of the skyscraper ofc, but there are scales that can measure that difference quite easilty. Of course I look forward to learning about how cosmic rays interfere with the scales.

[@paullefevre8684]

Hold up any object in the "air." The air is less dense than the object (say, a pen). The air below the pen is less dense than the pen. The air ABOVE the pen is less dense than the pen. The air to any side of the pen is less dense than the pen. But if you release it, it does DOWN. Always. Never up, or sideways. DOWN, towards the center of the earth. Proving "density" has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with which way the pen will move when you let go of it.

[@OldManTenno]

Here is something I’d like fe to explain… In the Navy, we used radar extensively. Ships have incredibly powerful radars that peer through all atmospheric conditions. The antennas for these (and pretty much every other antenna) are placed at the tops of structures called a mast. Even a large and stable ship such as an aircraft carrier does this, despite the challenges to construction and maintenance. Despite this, long range surface search radars are line of sight limited to around 50 miles (there is a smaller surface search radar for close range tracking). Air search radars can detect much smaller objects (aircraft) at much greater ranges, in excess of 250 miles (unclassified). And this just isn’t the U.S. Navy, but all top tier navies throughout the world. With nothing to block them in the middle of the ocean, why can’t the large naval vessels spot another large naval vessel beyond 50 miles regardless of atmospheric conditions, yet track a single seat fighter jet at over 250 miles? I’ll get the popcorn…

[@FokkeWulfe]

Well see, that's just what they want you to believe. Did you actually get out there and measure *with your eyes* the distances, or did you just go with the distances they *told* you everything was? If you stood on the deck of your ship with a Nikon P-900, you'd be able to zoom right in on those other ships. How'd I do? Was that realistic sounding? I feel like I laid it on a bit thick.

[@OldManTenno]

@@FokkeWulfe Lol. No, that’s pretty good. Thing is, I did also actually do the measurements as well. Either going to a stationary ship, or to the buildings in a port. Point is, being on the surface poses a disadvantage because of the curve. It’s also another reason that militaries deploy AWACS, because they can see farther.

[@FokkeWulfe]

@@OldManTenno oh I figured. I'm from a Navy family myself. You know I had to use the Mk. 1 eyeball argument though. Oh! Now I'm supposed to say "you're so brainwashed you only *think* that's what you measered!" Right? Lol.

[@richardhanck972]

Add in shortwave and surface-wave propagation for OTH radars and watch the Flerfish heads explode. "We have radars that can detect things much farther than direct line of sight radar systems, but they _cannot_ work with a direct line of sight? What sorcery is this!"

[@FokkeWulfe]

@@richardhanck972 Tell them you tied a Nikon P-900 to a stick, and that's how radar works. They'll buy it.

[@eddawg79]

When he was arguing the train argument I almost thought he was gonna connect the dots, then he went full flat earther on himself.

[@BudgieQPD]

He almost did it with the levels too. I thought he was going to realise the globe makes sense for everything.

[@renedekker9806]

Yes. "Talking about linear momentum in a linear path is totally obsolete", but does not realise that he is ridiculing his fellow "1000 miles per hour" flat earthers.

[@tnerbsg8134]

He was SOOO close

[@haleyw5677]

they aren't even saying that gravity is just a "theory" anymore. They have moved on to calling it a "thought experiment"

[@NWolfsson]

"an imagined globe" is what scared me the most. It's a very specific and undermining choice of words. (Also, I blame the conspirationists as much as I do MatPat from "Game Theory" for weakening the meaning of a scientific theory in the public's eye. A theory is a verified model to explain a concept that can't be factually checked. It IS the next best thing after a straight-up fact. A theory is a very big deal, )

[@finnmcool2]

I may be wrong but, at one point, I think he was trying to use Newton to disprove Newton. That's impressive.

[@gazpachopolice7211]

If I recall , the flat feathers initially called gravity a hoax but quickly went to accepting that gravity exists but it works only in a way that proves their bias.

[@hargroves240]

You were not wrong had to watch that part 3 times

[@clivedavis6859]

A variation of Toons flerf law #1.

[@michaelgoldstein8516]

He used the Newton to destroy the Newton.

[@frocat5163]

Well, yeah... All science a flerf references can be used to disprove any other part of science with which the flerf disagrees. That's just, like, _basic,_ isn't it?

[@tzvikrasner6073]

Owning himself by proving every meme, with his kid crying in the background. Father of the year.

[@thatguy5391]

I'm not sure if its his kid, I hear another man's voice in it but idk, father of the year still.

[@rumblehat4357]

Maybe the kid is realizing that he is his father.

[@ningkon3787]

Well kids are total monsters.

[@PirateReviewer]

At least he has some - you don't.

[@TomJakobW]

@@PirateReviewerwow, scathing!

[@DenisLoubet]

It's amazing how close he comes to the truth only to deftly dodge it at the last second.

[@Django45]

“There is an art, it says, or rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. … Clearly, it is this second part, the missing, which presents the difficulties.” ― Douglas Adams, Life, the Universe and Everything (ground equals truth in this case) This man overcame the difficulties and is in a state of eternal flight (from the truth) - pun intended

[@quinsutton7097]

That in newspeak is "Crimestop".

[@oberonpanopticon]

⁠@@Django45I always liked how doug was basically describing an orbit (at least, that brief excerpt is a good way to describe one)

[@alistairgrey5089]

This guy's confidence in his ignorance is honestly astounding.

[@introverted_nerd]

look up the Dunning Kruger effect.

[@alistairgrey5089]

@@introverted_nerd I have. It still surprises me when someone is this confident about something that's complete bullsh*t.

[@ascendedvessel5422]

This is why this is infuriating. Sometimes that "blissful ignorance" can quickly become "obnoxiously ignorant"

[@the_algorithm]

He knows the truth. He just makes money conning people that fall for his BS

[@alistairgrey5089]

@@the_algorithm that's actually more believable than otherwise.

[@jfh667]

He calls the memes ridiculous, and then perfectly explains why he believes in the meme.

[@Spekor]

@@flat_earth_forever where i live there is a very large and very flat lake. you can look across it. and actually see the curvature of the earth

[@АлексейЮрловский]

People do not become flat earthers by being self aware

[@Sweetie-zf3ss]

@flat_earth_forever oh wise one ☝️ u have convinced me may I hear more wise words from u 🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭😅🤣😅🤣😂😅😂😅💖

[@nikkiofthevalley]

​@Satchelhandle Report for misinformation and move on. Do not reply, do not mention them in another comment. What they want is attention, don't give them it.

[@nikkiofthevalley]

@Satchelhandle It is literal misinformation, deliberate spreading of false information. That seems unlikely, most sensible companies wouldn't hire such people to do moderation of any social media platform.

[@Hachizukatenzo]

I love how he constantly get so close from admitting the scientific consensus. It must have been hard for him keeping himself from accidentally making sense for all these years.

[@onemoreweirdo207]

I love how especially with the airplane one he literally explains the science behind it, realises what he's saying and then proceeds to justify why it doesn't work on earth

[@hoej]

HE WAS SO CLOSE!

[@joseraulcapablanca8564]

I’m living in Finnmark, one of the two places where the distance to the sun was first measured, using parallax, guess Phukwit word has not heard that it was too recent for him. It was after all in the sixteen seventies and his science knowledge stops thousands of years ago with genesis. With his incredible height he is also much nearer to cloud cuckoo land than normal humans. Thanks Dan.

[@Marconius6]

"Ask anyone to give you a measurable example of large bodies of water curving" Okay, here's an Olympic sized swimming pool, a really long bridge, the Chicago skyline and some boats going over the horizon. "Well that doesn't count because... uhh, it's all CGI. And refraction. And the Black Swan!"

[@ingiford175]

How about look at water INSIDE a level.

[@hargroves240]

There are some great nasa videos of air bubbles floating in water bubbles guess what in micro gravity frame of reference water forms spheres density dosen't affect it

[@BruceCarroll]

And dewdrops on a spider's web.

[@lucca3113]

yeah these people dont understand how H2O makes bonds. water isn't just some magical element that stays level no matter what. its molecules can very well bend and curve depending on the forces acting upon it, much like the charged balloon experiment showed. water molecules themselves are curved. of course the point of said experiment flew over his head, and that's why *real* experiments will never convince a *real* flat earther.

[@notamoron2246]

How about raindrops? Also, ever heard of a shot tower? Not water, but still liquid.

[@tickledthefrog]

As an American I can say that this guy disproves our thinking that an English accent automatically makes you sound smart!!!

[@jackdshellback3819]

I feel so ashamed and disappointed when I hear a flat earther with an English accent.

[@AndrewHalliwell]

The British invented the dunce cap for a reason...

[@kevinblessing4257]

As an American, I can say shut up, you do not speak for us or yourself very well.

[@OfficialSuperMKG]

Well, as an English person, some English accents do, whilst other English accents make it seem like you've never heard of the word 'education'.

[@jackdshellback3819]

@@AndrewHalliwell On foolscap paper no doubt.

[@joevanweedler]

i love how they accept science up to the point it disproves flat earth. 100% believe water flows to the lowest point but then try to say gravity isn't real

[@OnASeasideMission]

Thanks for the shout out for Earth Science degree holders. Shall I, yet again, cite the fact that a gravitometer must be corrected for latitude due to... A 15deg per hour drift. Thanks Bob.

[@tma2001]

and talking of plumb bobs and spirit levels, nearby mountains deflect the local vertical. This was a problem for the first 19th C imperial surveyors of overseas colonies until it was recognised and allowed for. Hardly a 'thought experiment' ! But then who ever expected a flerf to be familiar with the history of Geodesy.

[@jackthetford7558]

Longitude

[@OnASeasideMission]

@@jackthetford7558 Nope, latitude. The angular momentum of Earth's rotation decreases from the Equator to the pole. Other corrections apply for elevation and topography but I'd love to hear a flerf explain the gravitometer. They'll dismiss it, naturally.

[@frocat5163]

@@OnASeasideMission Isn't the angular momentum constant, and the tangential linear momentum decreases from equator to pole? I could be mistaken; it's been 25 years since I took a physics class...

[@OnASeasideMission]

@@frocat5163 The radius vector is normal to the axis of rotation, which shortens with increasing latitude. Bottom line. The centripetal force opposing the gravitational force reduces with increasing latitude. Even longer since geophysics, but it was in my exam.

[@mattihelin5101]

Flatties, denies moon landings. But according to them, you'd be able to fly to the moon with a helicopter.

[@OriginalPiMan]

Nah, even most flat earthers think the moon's too high for that. I saw one claim of 5500km, I think. So for big rockets only. Even the rockets we send to low orbit wouldn't get as high as at least some of these people say the moon is.

[@mattihelin5101]

@@OriginalPiMan according to some flatties the moon is inside the firmament and the firmament is about 30 miles high, sooo... And let's not forget those flatties who say the sun and the moon can be seen inside the clouds :D

[@cosmoshfa88savant66]

HAHAHA!!

[@demo2823]

​@@OriginalPiMan If the moon is so far, but we can only see to the horizon, why can we see the moon beyond the horizon sinking behind it?

[@OriginalPiMan]

@@demo2823 I'm not going to pretend flat Earth makes sense. Because it doesn't.

[@bryanleisure]

“Water doesn’t curve”.... I recall in science class having to estimate water heights when it was in a tube due to the water level curving in the glass tube.

[@atticstattic]

I'm pretty sure surface tension isn't what they had in mind.

[@Diabolnes]

@@atticstattic Not sure they have much in mind.

[@leebasham1107]

I am truly jealous of the fact that he turn his brain off and still be awake.

[@WetDoggo]

have you heard of A dolphin?

[@bradliston2836]

What’s funny, is that the balloon meme is showing a very small force acting upon water and pulling it toward itself. Kind of like another small force we experience. 🤔

[@scaper8]

Oh, oh! I know, magical pixie dust! That's the force, right?!

[@elifoote2995]

@scaper8 You got it, great job!

[@dynogamergurl]

Is that other small source his two brain cells?

[@MrCool-lo3ls]

@@scaper8 NOOO! It's obviously love that is pulling the water. Only an unstoppable force can bend an unbendable liquid.

[@b.v.nielsen8714]

Imagine entering a room full of these weirdos. You are instantly the smartest person in the room.

[@0Clewi0]

Who knows, maybe someone there has the emotional intelligence to scam the rest and not want to blow their fucking brains in the process.

[@lyravain6304]

Sad thing is, you'd become an idiot by osmosis. Their stupid is contagious.

[@b.v.nielsen8714]

@@lyravain6304 Yeah, you're right, better stay clear of them. 🤣👍

[@shragamildiner8472]

And you'd immediately fly, because they're all incredibly dense

[@borano2031]

And it would NOT boost your ego... Rgr

[@dragorphis1]

How the hell did this guy explain the basics of tangents to a circle, but doesn’t understand how that logic relates to a sphere 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@frocat5163]

Because flerfing morons can't think in 3 dimensions. In their limited minds, circles and sphere's aren't related in any way.

[@O_Lee69]

3D weakness

[@urbanstarship]

Didn’t think he could be defeated by a silly meme, but the airline dinner really tripped him up.

[@ATalkingDoubleBarrel]

The fact that some people take memes too seriously completely destroy my hope for humanity

[@miraqen7801]

it's not the meme but the idea of feeling like you know better than billions of brilliant minds. they just love huffing their own farts in the smallest pond of all and think that using insults reinforce their beliefs.

[@Dr.KarlowTheOctoling]

They value unfunny, obsolete memes over actual empirical studies, mathematical equations, and the consensus of thousands of scientists. How laughable

[@LuigiFan1akaStar]

Well, it is a Flat Earther so already there is something wrong with the person to begin with

[@assininecomment1630]

Insults are easy to make up by yourself, are even easier to find in their paranoid anti-science echo-chambers, and don't require any capacity for reason or checking anything, @@miraqen7801. Any carbon-based lifeform can crank out a cackhanded insult - and feel clever 🤓 and successful 🥇. In their mind, that's a double win! 🏆🏆

[@SamanthaLaurier]

Your memes end here -Raiden

[@eddeh0772]

The “nothing wrong with KZbin” argument has pangs of Michael Scott taking about Wikipedia where he says, “anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject… so you know you’re getting the best information”

[@prich0382]

Still there are many brilliant videos on subjects, but there are even more misinformation videos. Wikipedia requires citations, all the sources for things you find on Wikipedia are available for you to look up yourself, hence all the numbers on some of the words or sentences

[@teebosaurusyou]

@@prich0382 Many Wikipedia articles definitely do have information tagged with 'citation needed'.

[@eddeh0772]

@@prich0382 I think that’s fair, but there’s also a lot of dodgy info on there. If you want a laugh, I recommend googling what happened to the Scots Wikipedia. A huge slice of I was written by a well intentioned but incredibly misinformed US teen who has essentially undermined its entire credibility

[@roberttoegel8304]

​@@eddeh0772I agree. There was one "article" there once (with "citations?") that was incorrect. I tried to correct it with various citations. The next week, the original poster changed it back to its incorrect version (Yes, was changed to include my correction) and after that, I never bothered with Wikipedia again.

[@shadowsrose4978]

"Gravity not real so if you were on a globe you would slide off..." Ok...how? What force pulls me "down" the side of a globe in space?

[@Matuse]

Flerfs: "Water cannot bend" Also Flerfs: "We mean large bodies of water cannot bend"

[@romanroad483]

And then they demonstrate that large bodies of water cannot bend with a small bath of water.

[@andyh3065]

It still boggles my mind. This guy lives somewhere very close to beaches and the ocean. Surely he’s sat there and thought “Gee, I wonder why that ship’s bottom is disappearing as it goes away from me?” And no one, well other than FLERFs needed a degree to know the earth is a sphere. Primary school is way more than you need to understand that. 🥴

[@AndrewHalliwell]

I wonder how many times he's phoned to coast guard or RNLI to report sinking ships on the horizon...

[@andyh3065]

@@AndrewHalliwell 🤣

[@demo2823]

I wonder why he thinks the ocean horizon is the farthest he can see, but he can see the sun and moon disappear behind it. Or are they sinking into the sea just before it? Does the rest of the world see a different sun and moon? Why does nobody boating out on that horizon have footage of the luminary sinking into the water?

[@clivedavis6859]

Not only that, he lives near the equator, so equinoxes and views of the stars are other things he can observe,

[@Tsudico]

@@demo2823 Why does he think there should be a horizon at all? Perspective vanishing point occurs at infinity, atmospheric visibility is a maximum of a couple hundred miles but usually less. A horizon shouldn't exist on a flat earth at the beach because you should be able to see until atmospheric visibility extinction and the water and sky blend in a nice gradient where you can't tell where one ends and the other begins.

[@alexc4300]

I love how, because THEY don’t know how it’s done, “it’s never been done.” SMH

[@MegaloTnt]

When we got to the movement part, the plane and train, he basically uses an argument that literally proves we can be moving on earth-

[@samapico]

He even insists that the train and plane experiments are related to linear momentum, while the spinning globe would be angular momentum... And he's right about that. However, if we're talking about angular momentum, then we also acknowledge that we "feel" 15 degrees per hour, not the thousands of miles per hour as they always put it. If the Earth was spinning much faster, we would definitely feel it. Spin it fast enough and we would get flung from it, even (ignoring the fact that there wouldn't be a planet in the first place).

[@geekehUK]

You absolutely can do the spirit level experiment. 1. Buy a couple of 100mw green lasers 2. At night, go to either somewhere that's flat for miles, or pick two decently tall hills 3 - 5 miles apart 3. Have you and a partner ascend each one to the same height above sea level 4. Use a compass to make sure you're both facing each other 5. Throw down a couple of sandbags then place a spirit level on top and work it back and forth on the bag until it's exactly level 6. Place the laser pointer on top, stick it with some tape. Both turn on your lasers. If the earth is flat then both lasers will fire at each other, if it's a globe, they'll both fire into the sky and intersect each other at an angle. (Be sure to avoid firing powerful lasers toward any flight paths, as they can hit planes and dazzle the pilots.) Oh and of course water isn't always level, it bulges both towards the moon and 180 degrees away from it, it's called the tide.

[@CD_Character]

According to Dubay, the tide is "the gentle rising and falling of the waters on the bosom of the earth."

[@hamnporkgamer]

They kinda did that in the documentary but they say it's "inconclusive" because it doesn't fit their narrative

[@geekehUK]

​@@CD_Characterlol Ah that makes total sense... Except that high tide is at a different time everywhere around the world, and it slips back a few minutes every day. In fact if you do the math it very much appears to travel around the world at about 15 degrees per hour.

[@CD_Character]

@@geekehUK That's Dubay for you !

[@mjjoe76]

@@geekehUK I feel like I should say “Thanks Bob!” 😁

[@wombat4191]

The balloon part was specifically funny because the force a static electricity inflicts on the water stream can actually be thought of as an miniature analogy of gravity. A sphere attracts the water so that it doesn't just flow "down".

[@petergaskin1811]

Poor Phuket Word doesn't realise that the "Flat Earth" is neither important nor relevant. It merely remains one of the best sources of comedy videos on the whole of the Internet.

[@barryon8706]

"Water is level and if not it would flow downhill." - someone who's never really thought about tides.

[@caru3257]

I was thinking about waves and then I found your comment.

[@layzee3810]

I love how all of his points are literally based on him not knowing how gravity works

[@hatersgonnalovethis]

Im always wondering. What is the point? Why do they think there is a world wide conspiracy to keep them from knowing about flat earth going on? How (on earth) is that even a thing?

[@catrybou123]

@@hatersgonnalovethisthere are some different reasons given by different people, the main ones being hiding god and some sort of control.

[@oberonpanopticon]

⁠​⁠​⁠@@catrybou123ah yes, I always loved that one. someone out there has the influence necessary to keep a massive secret for thousands of years worldwide, but instead of using that influence to build up a 1984 style dystopia where free thought is impossible, they decide “ya know what’d be real funny? if we convinced people the world was round lol”

[@danteortega6510]

@@hatersgonnalovethisthe other common theory I hear is that the main motive is funding, nasa gets all these billions of dollars that they would then just pocket/use to make cover ups. It makes no sense

[@OldManTenno]

FE: “Large bodies of water cannot curve” Physics: “Tides exist, affect opposite sides of the planet at once, and are measurable and predictable” FE: “You know it’s a fact that masons have access to land beyond the ice wall, right?”

[@abelis644]

I have a nice little house beyond the ice wall, the grass in my garden is purple, the sky is yellow, clouds are pink with little polka dots, there are furry snakes, tall hippos, giant ladybugs dragonflies and butterflies... I go down on vacation. Please don't tell anyone! 🤫😎

[@monterrang1]

@@abelis644 *tells everyone*

[@TriggerWarning88]

@@flat_earth_forever space pushes gases back down to earth, just like everything else on this planet….. just so you know oxygen is pretty heavy that’s why there is less of it the higher you go. What dose gas pressure have to do with the atmosphere? Like how do they tie together? I would ask you about entropy of gases but I don’t think you have a degree……. So should I? Space being a vacuum just means it’s empty not that it sucks stuff up like a vacuum cleaner. The only difference between space on earth and outer space, is the atmosphere.

[@TriggerWarning88]

@@flat_earth_forever But how can space suck mass when it pushes mass back down to earth? How dose gas pressure and the atmosphere tie together? So if earth has a dome…. Doesn’t that mean your flat earth is only half flat? And not actually flat?

[@OldManTenno]

@flat_earth_forever Walk up to the dome and place your hand on it, then take a picture so everyone else can see what it looks like. That’d be really helpful to understand.

[@fenman1954]

Ah so he's done loads of experiments yet every experiment they have done proves the globe , Thanks Bob and Interesting.

[@ElementofKindness]

Seems the biggest difficulty for flerfs, is the understanding that "up" and "down" are merely conceptual descriptions of describing "towards" and "away from." Everything flerfs believe in completely falls apart with this one basic understanding.

[@88marome]

"If you encountered a curve then you would slide of it" Holy crap! I must be sheltered because I've never heard a flat earther say that before! I didn't think they actually believed that!

[@engineeredlifeform]

There's a great bit of footage from a Flerf conference (in Derby, UK I think?) where a flerf said if the Earth was round, you wouldn't need to use petrol in your car if you drove South, you'd just let off your handbrake and coast downhill. They really don't understand the model they reject.

[@Mars-dw2zc]

@@engineeredlifeform omg they think we live on the planets from The Little Prince lmaooo

[@gazpachopolice7211]

​@@engineeredlifeformbut you would need petrol to get back up north.

[@cygnustsp]

Phuket literally once put a soda can in a table, tilted the table and the can rolled off, and says aha see the earth can't be curved

[@RogueWraith909]

@@cygnustsp Oh FFS.... seriously? He actually did that?! What a plank.

[@purefoldnz3070]

3:01 "Oodles of proof we live on a stationary earth." Oh oodles of proof lol. Well he's got us there, cant debate oodles.

[@duncanmcneill7088]

Just how big is an “oodle”? Most humans have several billion of brain cells. Flat Earthers on the other hand have several oodle brain cells. Maybe “oodle” is to “billion” what “micro” is to “mega”.

[@demo2823]

​@@duncanmcneill7088 If the arguments are marble-sized, oodles are too many to hold in your hands without them spilling off.

[@bob_the_bomb4508]

@Hectic Narcoleptic like ‘string Theory’. Only more moist :)

[@jediknight129]

​@Duncan McNeill less than a metric fuckton more than a metric shit ton which are both smaller than their imperial counterparts.

[@nickryan3417]

I think the definition of "Oodles" is a typo. It's 00000's of proof...

[@sherylbegby]

I've never been in so much pain from listening to bad physics. I didn't even think it was possible. Get this man an inertial frame of reference!

[@wizardsuth]

It's true that sitting on the surface of the spherical rotating Earth is not exactly the same as sitting in a train or plane moving in a straight line. The acceleration is too slight to feel, but with a sufficiently sensitive instrument you can detect it. For example, if you have a ring laser gyroscope, you can detect a... 15 degree per hour drift (Thanks, Bob!).

[@michaelleifels2004]

„You can find anything you want on KZbin“ - that’s exactly the problem.

[@sleethmitchell]

doing celestial navigation is a fairly common practice of sailors. it works pretty damn well because of spherical geometry. another thing that sailors have done with regularity is circumnavigation of THE GLOBE, which would be pretty tough on a plate-shaped object. it is astounding how many commonplace events a flat earther has to ignore to hold that belief.

[@Whis__]

Haven’t watched Flat Earth Friday in a while. It’s always refreshing to come back

[@Inksploded]

You didnt miss much lmao its not like flatearther got any smarter id even urgue they got even more dumb

[@mitchellminer9597]

I gotta give the guy credit. I think he did that whole thing freehand, with no prep at all. Either that or he is a really terrible prepper. It was a fascinating insight into his thought processes. Good one, Dan.

[@Hangiinjohnny]

Wait there’s oodles of evidence we aren’t moving and live on a pancake? But where? I’ve never seen any that can hold up to a question let alone actual experiments.

[@simond.455]

That moment when even memes are too difficult to understand for the average flerf. "Real physics" he said. 🤣

[@richardhanck972]

"What difference does having a degree make?" Embrace the meme, Phuket Word. Live it. Love it. Phuket.

[@AndrewErwin73]

when they talk about water finding its level (whatever that means), why doesn't anyone ever just show a dew drop? or a rain drop? where is the "level" there??? Why are soap bubbles round??? SO MUCH ACTUAL OBSERVATION is missed on both sides of this argument.

[@CarinaPrimaBallerina]

I've had a really bad week and have consequently felt some bad low self-esteem. Phuket actually made me realize that I may not be that bad off after all in compare to many other unfortunate people! This whole video made me think that I'm lucky to function as a healthy-minded woman! And laughed a lot during the playback! Thank you, Dan!

[@abelis644]

You are strong and awesome, don't let anyone or anything get you down, whatever it is, it's not worth it. 💐🎁🎈🎉🎆🌠🌌☀️

[@CarinaPrimaBallerina]

@@abelis644 ❤

[@andrewburrell4514]

Sorry about your week. X

[@CarinaPrimaBallerina]

@@andrewburrell4514 Thank you kindly, I'm better now 🙂

[@BradLancaster86]

Seriously all laughs are helpful, you just gave us some of that optimism!! Thank you too!

[@richardscratcher6075]

Phuket seems to have been gifted with a most amazingly engaging and charismatic voice. It's a pity that the brain feeding it can only output a stream of useless drivel.

[@protoborg]

@B.L.A. Or shortwave radio.

[@chrisantoniou4366]

@@protoborg I see what you did there...

[@okeesmokee6658]

A new low - arguing with memes found in the internet. Reminds me of the Simpsons episode where the newspaper article says, "Old man yells at cloud".

[@Marconius6]

"The chasm of his mind" is a good way to describe a flerf.

[@spiderzvow1]

I think of it more as a shallow puddle

[@stringtheorysucks]

You assume they have a mind.

[@VariantAEC]

Typically when one looks at the bell curve, IQ is along the x axis. When I read a joke like yours I realize the bell curve I'm using places the level of education of individuals along the X axis with IQ on the y axis even so the bell curve still looks more or less the same. IQ is more of a measure of intellectual flexibility, think of it as a measure of adaptability to new challenges unique to cognition separate from physical ability and memorization. You might be better educated compared to any flerf, but your IQ will likely be on the same floor as the flerf you're making fun of.

[@teebosaurusyou]

@@spiderzvow1 Shallow puddle with flat water.

[@TheFazer1992]

You can really tell he had to check the train one as he was speaking in case he sodded it up🤣

[@craftinghome]

Yeah, he struggled to not tell the truth well enough to disprove his flerf derp!

[@LeoBonnaGuitarrista]

I'm allways amazed how flat earthers allways have that "north-hemispheric-centered" perspective... Send them to Australia, South Africa and Argentina with a compass and ask them how is it possible that the south point in the compass still points to the south in every ocasion... Or any other observation that doesn't rely on things that are only bisible in the north hemisphere, like constelations, polaris, the seasons, etc.)

[@theangryotaku3361]

4:48 im sure his mind would disintegrate if he was introduced to this little thing known as "surface tension"

[@cryptocoinkiwi8272]

If you are denser than the air around you it still doesn't explain why you fall down. Air is all around you.

[@CD_Character]

Gigantor is denser than everything around him.

[@gazpachopolice7211]

Birds are also denser than air as also a whole range of flying insects. Also the flat earth is dense so it must have fallen down and broken into pieces moments after its creation. 🙄

[@RustyWalker]

If you're standing on rock, rock is denser than you are, but you're still being "pulled" down, idiomatically speaking. Also, although the air around you is pretty much the same density, it gets *less* dense with altitude generally, not *more* dense, so why don't you fall up?

[@bunnykiller]

exactly, why dont they fall like a coin "falls" in water with a side to side fluttering motion but generally down too

[@notamoron2246]

If anything, you should fall up, as air density (measurably) falls with altitude.

[@伊紹菲]

“Of course we can’t know the distance to any luminaries” Parallax: am I a joke to you?

[@BSJuliaMagna]

This guy is so close to getting self aware so many times with his "debunking"

[@c.augustin]

I'm still not sure if he's not a POE. The mental and visual trickeries in his videos make me think that he actually knows and just trolls his followers. But perhaps I'm reading too much into it.

[@princejm448]

​@@c.augustin"Because he's a member of the elite, a part of the globe Earth propaganda."

[@c.augustin]

@@princejm448 ???

[@rayfighter]

@@c.augustin you are. He is in denial, because god.

[@c.augustin]

@@rayfighter Then PW would be your common garden variety flerf. Interestingly enough I've not heard him using the Christian bible to argue FE, but he might be too clever to do so.

[@NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEJ]

Wait, so he does understand that if you jump in a train you do not move backwards. But he doesn't understand that a ball can travel at (IDK how many miles per hour) and you don't notice it.

[@Slicerwizard]

He's a liar. He knows exactly what the truth is.

[@teebosaurusyou]

Yeah, they regurgitate 'Can't be moving at ~1000mph at the equator, the water wouldn't stick to the ball!!'

[@tristonb1105]

Going to university does mean you know the earth is a globe because despite what flat earthers think the whole point of higher education is to teach you the skill to think critically, experiment, and interpret the results of your work and others peoples work. If you learn all these skills then you can come to your own conclusion based on the evidence. Even in trade schools you can learn the earth isn't flat, just look at a 1st year surveyors textbook.

[@systematic101]

It’s amazing he actually understands conservation of momentum but doesn’t get how it applies to the earth

[@MD-vs9ff]

Which means he doesn't truly understand it.

[@doomspud6302]

The same way he manages to explain how level works on a circle, but somehow can't apply it to a sphere. The cognitive dissonance it takes to Flerf is astounding.

[@Isaac_Flat_Earth]

​@@doomspud6302 All 7.8 billion people are flat earthers. You haven't realized it yet. Poor day dreamers can't get out of their flying rocky ball fantasy with curved water and spinning atmosphere, 🤣🤣

[@Isaac_Flat_Earth]

​@@doomspud6302 A ball wrecking question to globe slaves: According to you, earth is a giant treadmill, right? Because "it's spinning" you say. So any vehicle traveling at 100 kmph in the east direction for covering 100 km distance should take a longer time than covering the same distance in the westward direction at the same speed. Because earth spins from west to east, so while traveling west, the destination comes to you at 1600 kmph speed. So you should reach the 100 km westward destination much quicker. But in reality it takes exactly 1 hour to reach 100 km destination at 100kmph speed in both directions. This clearly scientifically proves that the earth is NOT spinning. CHECKMATE. Accept the flat reality, you won't regret.

[@Isaac_Flat_Earth]

So you globe slaves believe that we are flying upwards once, downwards once and sideways twice in a single day, and these movements happen everyday? 🤣🤣🤣 what kind of nonsense is this? Where is the logic here? There is absolutely no difference between our upward travel and downward travel even at 100,000 kmph speed. But you still claim this is true, shame on globers! And sun is dragging the ball earth at 700,000 kmph speed, a total of 800,000 kmph speed? 😂😂 OMG, I can't control my laughter. This is scientifically impossible. We would have seen and felt these motions and rotation if these were true. Our senses tell that we are not moving and absolutely standing still.

[@molybdomancer195]

Phuket Word claims KZbin and presumably other social media are great resources then complains memes don’t explain anything.

[@chestercheetahisinyourwall4041]

I learned the earth was spherical when I was 7, when I found out the center of the earth pulled stuff to the center, BENDING WATER around the earth. I knew more stuff at 7 then these guys as adults. Wow.

[@vohbovohborian28]

I haven't seen this video yet but the moon is indeed very close. Some even say it is the closest celestial object out of all of them.

[@TheBenjaminArgo]

I recommend using the phrase "nearest heavenly body" next time so you can follow this up with a "someone's mom" joke.

[@nickryan3417]

I found a much closer celestial object. I may be quite attracted to its gravity.

[@sengokunadekochan]

I decided I needed salad dressing for phuket's word salad. Heard him trying to use Newton to debunk Newton, I facepalmed, and now I have salad dressing on my face...

[@mandywalkden-brown7250]

Lol. Thanks, and now I have coffee all over my phone because of your comment!

[@NWolfsson]

4:02 STRAWMAN! We're not talking about graduates VS non-graduates, we're talking about the professors, researchers and the slew of knowledge they obtained and curated (by that I mean, removed from curriculum or changed previous theories that were proven false, because they do that) over the decades and centuries. Of course a degree doesn't make you an expert in all domains, but an university or a research lab do chose people that _are_ (and not TV show experts, mind, you, that is a whole other headache...)

[@ythinder]

When flerfers talk about "research" I always laugh out loud

[@nork7045]

When he said that you would slide off a globe Earth without gravity I completely lost it.I guess the natural “downward” force you constantly feel is completely unrelated to gravity

[@stinkyham9050]

Apparently that gravity also has no effect on water either because he thinks that the water can't curve around the globe. Lol.

[@churchoflob5955]

I really liked the spirit level bit. First, he perfectly explains why two spirits levels, placed far apart on a globe will both read as level, because gravity pulls towards the center of the globe. Then he claims that this explanation is contrary to "reality". Apparently, in his "reality", it is not possible for a globe to exist without a flat gravity table "below" it, sucking all fluids (and anything else not nailed down) off the "bottom" of it. What a hoot!

[@olisipocity]

Why are there locks in the Panamá Canal? If the water is "flat" how come one ocean is lower than the other?

[@darkiee69]

perspective!!

[@ReinoGoo]

The locks are to make the ships go up and down.

[@tompiper9276]

Well there is a mountain range between them. Though I believe there is a slight difference between the Pacific and the Caribbean in height.

[@morrisjvan]

the locks are to raise the water level over the mountains! Both sea levels are at ,er , well, sea level!

[@Er_Guille]

And also, tides are much bigger in the Pacific than in the Atlantic which would create dangerous currents in a canal without locks.

[@steve3291]

Why not just say "I don't understand gravity" and leave it at that?

[@Boa_Inc.]

If water doesn't curve, then how do we have water balloons???

[@bernieflanders8822]

It never fails to stun me that people can be so easily influenced by ridiculous ideas that do not match reality, just because they watched a few KZbin videos and didn’t learn how to do sums.

[@fart63]

That’s the nature of the internet

[@bernieflanders8822]

@@fart63 I know right. Who would have thought that putting the entirety of mankind’s knowledge at the fingertips of almost everyone on the planet would somehow lower the intelligence of mankind.

[@fleetadmiralj]

@@bernieflanders8822 I suppose it is predictable in hindsight. It allows people to selectively choose what information to believe more easily.

[@vinnieg6161]

Flat earth would be so simple to prove, just find the edge

[@kamo7293]

I always find it funny when they try to bring gravity, one of the fundamental forces of the universe, into question. oh dear indeed

[@alphazero924]

And the fact that they try to use density/buoyancy to replace it when gravity is the force that creates density and buoyancy. How does a person weigh more than air if there's nothing pulling on the air and person to give them weight?

[@0XBlondie96X0]

Right. They insist it doesn't exist but take for granted the very reality it creates: one where "down" is towards the Earth and "up" is away from it, but I guess it's easier to pretend it's not real than to come up with any sort of explanation for how gravity can work on a flat Earth.

[@Mrmastersterruser]

This reminds me of the old days when I watched flat earth videos without a middleman like scimandan. I allways considered them similar to fail videos. SciManDan functions bassically as failarmy, wonderful work of doing compilations of these fail videos from others. I would write a comment for close to everything this guy said but you did well so that I dont have to do it myself.

[@c.augustin]

It would've been interesting what he argues about map making and the Gleason map - yes, a "damage limitation exercise", but it could've been interesting, as he mentioned the two celestial poles, that can't exist on a flat earth (as the Gleason map shows - and it would get even more ridiculous when showing a projection from the south pole …). This last one makes me even more suspicious about PW …

[@sthormar]

I am saddened to have realized that FE members will never enjoy 3D printing, as they are unable to think in 3D....

[@cellulanus]

Wait- If gravity isn't real and water doesn't bend, then what the hell are the tides?

[@NWolfsson]

I dunno, man... Sea ground movement or some stuff like that? I came up with that in about half a second, that's probably what they'll go with if they get to that question.

[@Pottan23]

Flat earthers don't know, god probably.

[@garybobst9107]

These folks are a treasure! The world is a scary, ugly place, and comedy like this helps with the constant unpleasantness.

[@TrickOrRetreat]

Also i feel super smart just listening to them.

[@anthonymonge7815]

I throughly enjoy SciManDan’s videos. They are awesome!! Just one problem though. After I watch these Flat Earth Friday’s, it takes the whole weekend to regenerate the IQ points that got sucked out. I commend SMD for researching all of these and taking one for the team. My brain would break if I had to watch tons of them.

[@OfficialMeep]

no offense to anyone, but do people like that really exist?? or they just pretend

[@andrewbeasley1478]

When the meme of bath water came up and the argument was that all water flows to the lowest point, I found myself shouting at my phone " why does it flow DOWN hill?" I need a lie down. 🤦

[@l1nuxguy646]

Oh even better are the ones where they think that driving south is also going downhill!

[@cjthenarhwalking1378]

If density is what causes things to fall down. Why down?? It should fall up because density is lower on top of things

[@cloudsteele1989]

@@cjthenarhwalking1378 Density DOES cause things to rise (or 'fall up'). helium balloons, ping-pong balls in water, giant metal ships.

[@cjthenarhwalking1378]

@@cloudsteele1989 exactly so there must be something else causing things to fall

[@TheZombieSaints]

This is just great, my 10 year old son watched this with me and he was laughing as hard as I was! Great video as always Dan 👍🤣

[@lobban2]

A great age to learn critical thinking skills.

[@Hap_Shaughessy]

Even a ten year old is smarter than these guys 🤣

[@Pete...NoNotThatOne]

Just wait until he grows up and a flerfer gets elected to high office; then he’ll be weeping. Never forget, tomorrow’s leaders are currently being home-schooled by day drinkers.

[@miraak9521]

It’s so weird seeing how objectively well spoken and intelligent sounding he is while being completely misguided and wrong

[@--_--IMP--_--]

Phuket Word is quite skilled at inadvertently debunking his debunkings.

[@zoranocokoljic8927]

An old joke: my feet are flat, my beer is flat, I am flat and I live in a flat, ergo the Earth is flat. However, my girlfriend has some very convincing arguments to the contrary.

[@demo2823]

She got dem curves.

[@bob_the_bomb4508]

She’s got curved beer?

[@teebosaurusyou]

Better off than me.... I'm broke as well as flat....

[@Zoumie]

I love these flat earthers being like the research we do. I currently am working in a biology lab at my university and we quite literally can even use normal water in our experiments because it adds too much variation something tells me that these fall earthers aren’t being that conscious of variables.

[@jackmatthewtyson]

I keep trying to place myself in the experience of a flerfer, but I can't follow their entire reasoning. It gives me a headache

[@MrMargaretScratcher]

i don't think there's enough room up their ass for your head too...

[@jackmatthewtyson]

@@MrMargaretScratcher Does this mean I have to cook my own dinner from now on?

[@MrMargaretScratcher]

@@jackmatthewtyson unfortunately so!

[@maxwellshammer5283]

Once again, he wakes up and decides to make a video demonstrating his ignorance to the world.

[@theldrakis]

who is the one your saying demonstrating his ignorance?

[@maxwellshammer5283]

@@theldrakis PW.