I use weldments, which I then use to make a weldment cut-list table with cut lengths and angles. To achieve this same effect, I make a non-derived configuration with basically the same principal as you've demonstrated for the length calculation. I then tell the cultist table to calculate based on the flat configuration. If you use derived configurations this doesn't work. The only thing is, this doesn't exactly work for giving the cut angles of the flattened piece stock, so you have to do that manually.
@solidworkssolutions Жыл бұрын
Hi Talent! I appreciate you sharing your method. I understand where you're coming from; I've experimented with various approaches, but I couldn't find a straightforward solution either. However, our fabricators are thrilled with this method, and they believe it can consistently deliver precise bending results. So, I've been using this method for all applications for over two years now, and it hasn't let me down.
@JC-un4bg2 жыл бұрын
But you would still need to take into account the k factor of the tube . As the tubes centre line will stretch or Shrink depending on the type of tube and the tooling . So the more bends the more it will run out . You need to do a test bend to find the percentage in each degree of turn .
@solidworkssolutions Жыл бұрын
That's true, if you have many bends, it could be an issue, but in simple parts like this the accuracy is enough
@Bravetruckparts10 ай бұрын
To be more precise I generally use 42% of de diameter (only on round tubes) from the inner radius, or offset 8% from the center line to the inner side of the bend.
@TVLaa9 ай бұрын
some observations: The bracket in equations are not needed.. the L1,L2 equations are not needed you can make the equation to the flat dimensions just by double clicking the bend model and select a dimension from the model. And add a k-factor to the bend length and you get more precise flat view of the model (take the angle of the bend in the equation of the subtraction formula).
@huenguyentrong39410 ай бұрын
It is a wondwonderful lesson, thank you very much 💙
@solidworkssolutions9 ай бұрын
Thanks for your attention
@Eduardo-hg9tp7 күн бұрын
Muchas Gracias
@JF_Fabrications10 ай бұрын
Thanks for the Video, Great work flow
@solidworkssolutions9 ай бұрын
Thanks for your attention.
@tautegu5 ай бұрын
An easier method might be to create an empty 3D sketch and convert the line entities and make path. You can then dimension the path using "Path length dimension" and reference this instead.
@davideguerini93262 жыл бұрын
Best tube video ever!!! It Is perfect but a lot of work...!! 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@solidworkssolutions2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Davide, it was always painful for us in the fabrication shop to make these kind of parts and there are some add-ins about but in this method you can make it yourself.
@Designophilia2 жыл бұрын
@@solidworkssolutions Hey bro could i ask u call some pop add ins for this work in solidworks
@MohammadrezaMasoudi4 ай бұрын
سلام بسیارعالی(very good)❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
@sandeepsokhal11753 жыл бұрын
Sir Make more videos for Solidworks 🙏
@solidworkssolutions2 жыл бұрын
Sure I will
@Designophilia2 жыл бұрын
SO NICE
@luigipascolini95362 жыл бұрын
Can you ise the same process Even if you have different radius? Can you work with a stp file with your process?
@solidworkssolutions Жыл бұрын
Yes, it doesn't depend on radius, they could be anything. If you have step file, you have to create 3d Sketch and follow that profile to find dimensions, then you can draw flat version of that step file.
@artinedge3 жыл бұрын
Perfect 👍
@solidworkssolutions3 жыл бұрын
Tnx 🙏
@shashwatkasturey35202 жыл бұрын
This is as good as adding dimensions manually if you're dealing with a lot of cable sweeps or routed tubes. Pretty useless.
@solidworkssolutions2 жыл бұрын
Yes, it doesn't work when you are working with many cable sweeps, but in our fab shop we have maybe 50 or less bend tubes, and instead of buying another add-in for solidworks we could easily convert them to meaningful drawings for fabricators guys!