Supreme Court Hears Relentless, Inc v. Department of Commerce-A Case Regarding The Chevron Doctrine

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes.com/membership...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com

[@desandbonville9254]

Regulations are laws and all laws must be passed by Congress. Unelected bureaucrats should not be able to make laws. There are three branches of government in our system not four.

[@TehMorbidAtheist]

Those are not "unelected bureaucrats". Nice right wing talking point there. Those employees have jobs because the current presidential administration deems it worthy. Presidents, and their 40,000+ political emplyees/appointees are part of the executive branch Do you expect people to vote for new department heads every few months? Get real.

[@desandbonville9254]

They may be "appointed," but they are still unelected bureaucrats. We, the people, didn't elect them, and they are making laws . Nice try lefty.

[@imabadonegetoverit6465]

⁠​⁠@@TehMorbidAtheistthey are unelected, if people aren’t voting for them that means there not elected

[@pattih2732]

@@TehMorbidAtheist they don’t leave after each administration and become bloated from that admin policies, becoming an ecosystem that gets out of control. They are unelected Bureaucrats. ‘Get real’. Nice try radical thinker.

[@dragonflarefrog1424]

Congress can and does have absolute power to delegate it’s authority to civil servants in the executive. Civil servants can use their statutory authority to make regulations reasonably related to the law. Bureaucracies are not a fourth branch, they are part of the Article II branch and they enforce Article 1 authority.

[@BillyTheKidder]

Chevron should pay for their crimes against humanity!

[@richardreed2839]

This is not about chevron! Lol

[@the_big_dog813]

@@richardreed2839 Some posters are just fools and post without knowing what they are listening to -- pretty sure that Billy the clown doesn't know that the Chevron doctrine arose in a 1984 liberal Supreme Court case on the deference to unelected government agencies that are filled with political agendas.

[@johnjudd4208]

@@richardreed2839 chevron doctrine was created to protect the enviroment from companies that do not regulate them selves

[@BillyTheKidder]

I kid.. I actually don’t understand this issue enough to have an opinion. But they got my click, so they have to get my bs too.

[@johnjudd4208]

This stuff started because the Exxon Valdez oil spill that tainted the northwest coast for a long time

[@tylergodefroy8713]

lol do yall really think companies will do the right thing to keep us safe over higher profits?

[@lockwoodpeckinpaugh9252]

Hell no.

[@grittyfaithgrittyfacts]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. You're kidding, right? Not a snowball's chance in hell.

[@jessev5761]

This is about fisheries. Small businesses who depend on making sure their product doesn't die out. You are all beyond ignorant. This arent the kind of corporations WHOSE website you are on now. Google is a BILLION dollar company! Fisheries are SMALL BUSINESSES!!! Hypocrites much?

[@stevep7713]

It is scary these judges believe they actually will put the people above their profits

[@TreyAGeek]

Okay so get congress to act and stop taking so many breaks

[@katherinemahon9471]

Is there a difference between police being investigated by police and corporations interpreting laws for themselves.

[@janellmurphy6361]

When where lawyers and judges aloud to change the laws and makes there on laws?

[@Ilych367]

they don’t they determine what the law says and whether the law is valid when held up against the constitution

[@iAmtheron]

why should people have to pay for the guy thats going to monitor them outside of the taxes

[@ahrdee3041]

Courts need to put the legislative process (policy) back into the appropriate branch of government. Congress needs to do its job instead of deferring it to un-elected executive branch employees.

[@TehMorbidAtheist]

The house has been broken for decades since Gingrich. And it has been broken for even longer than that because of filibuster Get real.

[@CantoniaCustoms]

T. Republican voter or at least 2A advocate.

[@DDCrp]

I remember learning about Chevron in law class back in college- the whole class was *pissed* - nobody could wrap their heads around how such a blatant overreach was enshrined in our supposed democracy. Blatant overreach.

[@dragonflarefrog1424]

Lol your class was filled with fools. A reference to a reasonable interpretation by experts in their field is fine.

[@yockhunter]

Interstate commerce is used to regulate suppressors by the ATF which isn’t classified as a firearm per the ATF.

[@lockwoodpeckinpaugh9252]

What does anyone need those things?

[@MG-Alexandrovich]

@@lockwoodpeckinpaugh9252because a lot of polite people , don’t want to wake up their neighbors

[@TheZombieburner]

@@lockwoodpeckinpaugh9252 Because popping groundhogs at 7 AM otherwise would disturb my neighbor, who is a very nice lady.

[@CantoniaCustoms]

t. Republican.

[@imabadonegetoverit6465]

@@lockwoodpeckinpaugh9252 Hearing protection, noise pollution control, it’s actually considered rude in the UK and such to not use them

[@stevep7713]

We the people....

[@darrellbarnett2466]

Agreed!! 👍🇺🇸🙏

[@CantoniaCustoms]

t. Republican (I havent watched the full vid but I'm assumed you're against chevron)

[@douglaskampfer2028]

There is a difference between interpretation of law and interpretation of policy, so long as policy conforms to the law then there is no problem, if the policy does not explain it's content or requirements then it needs to ruled on by what the laws are, that's the job of a judge.

[@Angl0sax0nknight]

If a statue or law isn’t clear the court should send it back to congress. The executive power is to enforce laws that are clear and concise passed by Congress.

[@insanityraging6832]

Unelected entities can not be allowed to make rules that destroy people's livelihood and Entire industries or threated to. This is far from reasonable and more like draconian. If the Government wants this then they need switch it from selected to elected.

[@guardianangeleighthorderes2950]

Thanks, to the Forbes News channel. I say. I freely exercise. Under, "the U. S. Constitution 1st Amendment right of free speech - of the press." 1st: I comment: In proportion to the hearing in the Relentless, Inc v. Department of Commerce-A Case U.S. Supreme Court and proxy science. From after the argument, rebuttal. I see the Chevron standard is the best reasonable standard for this secular case. 2nd: I comment. At having self determination at seeing the pendulum bind space into the nothing of new change delivery in law of which I render nothing in the above secular case. At the conclusion of the hearing. I freely write forth. (sentence) I comment about what if any public concerns any outcome in the following the conclusion of the above US Supreme Court case would have of any change over all Americans. From the above record that would belong in coming. From the above record. Could there be possibly preceding future danger: That would result from the above case. Could there be A leadership. From over ruling most of all the Chevron used in the case - after the case, so as to would it belong to evince evade toxicology reports evading liabilities writing wrongs into Rights incoming at the exchange. From one of those personal computed planned warfare designs to use devices in guest of torturing the occupation of value of progress in Congress for a Nation of Millions with confidentiality, privacy and private thinking for reasonable people learned in the use of faculty of the Universe, is it so as to dispose of one nation's reasonable standard of active care, so as to do a motif of personal darkness collected for networking volition doing immoral laxity slight of insider trading monopolizing any exposure with cynical and improper use of ether that is forever permeated into the spectacle fabric uniform of authority to transform people into beast with in the past ten (10) years. Is it to corroborate American independence to stock brokers, financial advisers wealth managers poised to stool pigeoning the federal reserve system with IRS definition of government planned status, is it to tamper with seasons in want to vainly create storms to please the most of hostile and ungenerous representations harnessed at capitulating to a circus undercover contemt(s) for human life. At family owned; any of residential / any of commerce / any of government environment minutes wanton argument while enraged crying without sentiment caused by the courage to meaning people are not real estate and defended by powers of congress to declare commission of asserting jurisdiction over persons who are members of an enemy army, and are accused of violating the laws of war. Is it by going on the road in disguise of parody to pretend offenses and to vandalize the Right to travel for the exchange of a new wave of migration against Americans. Come to lead by one personal esteem for the sweet essentials of reputation. Is it to base American elections in Congress to repeat injury and insult. Is it to in Congress retreat and submit to American enemies. Is it that by now Americans can only have liberty, by a new wave of confederate states subterfuges wanting slavery without any crime committed. All the wrong in the above being forbidden. Is it to pretend the night life scene is dark and the daylight scene is evil. Is it to forge the abandonment of the holy cause of free people. For the vanity of fixing prices to benefit this one secular case that is argued at exclude peers. I breath my earnest health. Is it to only gain personal obstructed breathing fulfillment to live complex. As a result of what hyphen hypothesis of fluency or leniency shall gentlemen - willingly have. With the used vernacular in arguing a tearing away at Chevron and pledges to nation. Is it to evince the exchange. From one of those personal computed planned designs. To dispose of one nation's reasonable standard of active care to do vigilant discrimination. From all. Is it for plunder. By putting into scope the conditional schemes of species that target vertical treasures never hearing the memorial for Abraham Lincoln. By the cry of scamming and exploiting routines. From fenced in nailed contracts of failed enterprises together with failed democracies using improper inventions of baby powder formulated actors pretending to be strict robots. At city zones / policing for the forged empty building encroachment corporate pirating model hatefully scamming - the law and rule of law, canons, courting naked agresions, deep fakes over implorable circumstances resceding. By informed persons of property taxed through systematically putting settings of stool pigeoning into the jack swing federal reserve with circus of rated art material of: am I my brothers keeper. Esteemed by every previous generations borrowing at idol credit score lending never reaching maxims whenever undoing the same alarming tariffs imposed by the meters of treasury. Is it that there would be guise of world trade in the name of one unseated discord. From unbegotten party cartoon commercials selling American defenses through plots of liguidity within non refundable assembled compacts going into gambling Las Vegas Casino implosions and effectively achieving: Stealing from dutiful citizens responsible destiny for the anatomy of a wedding marriage, hand knitted sweaters, future for children. Then literring the autopsy of custodial humane voting for council in political conditions of free people. Politely I say. Every vote counts into results. At agencies typically encompassing a service. For all people and not for only one person that could be trending infectious - fungus isthmus liabilities that argue insurgence against in congress house democracy separation of powers for mutating courts with insufficient expertise of aging firm practice of undeclared evolved without direction impreganable consumption of defamation cordial flesh eating bacteria. For the benefit of the self regiment minded and future temper ideal that would be charged at kangaroo generations expatriate footing the malice, malignant citizenship next to alliances and misunderstanding the wireless eternal peace of God's offspring that battles headed for framing of the USA Constitution. For the rights of anyone disparaged on the environment that should born a self defense against a conspiracy of unbalanced tyrants of a tyranny of judges, prosecutors, officials, law firms and marxist misconduct soliciting the work of Judas Iscariot for the purpose of in career thinking tank crucifixion capabilities of marxist military treading daily engendered by power of homogeny to employ / deploy force fraud coercion monopoly to monthly supplies, wealth, buy independent contractors to black mail, extortion within tax brackets for anti competition racketeering for deserted municipal / corporate capricious tortious (tax credit /tax refund) - super computing activities to arbitrate sexuality arbitrate individual tax filings, stalking, harassing - to deplete American resources, ruining American commerce as Americans know it destructive to full faith of peace for the living soul and credit for proper use of the land, fulfilling the Great responsibility we owe to God and our country, within a hosting nation, so to offend, the judicial branch, the executive branch, the legislative branch in violation of the we are all the declared born free people of: United States of America Constitution.

[@grittyfaithgrittyfacts]

This is exactly what I was thinking! So glad someone else said it " For the benefit of the self regiment minded and future temper ideal that would be charged at kangaroo generations expatriate footing the malice, malignant citizenship next to alliances and misunderstanding the wireless eternal peace of God's offspring that battles headed for framing of the USA Constitution" 🥸🥸🥸🥸🥸🥸🥸🥸🥸🥸🥸

[@user-tk5xq3dr2j]

🇱🇷 RESULTS ARE?

[@ronridenour243]

It should be like VAR. Defer to the agency decision unless there is a clear and obvious error.

[@CantoniaCustoms]

t. Democrat

[@-Drop-]

This one is a slippery slope

[@CantoniaCustoms]

t. Dem

[@garyjett7232]

Some math there😮

[@TehMorbidAtheist]

We are so effed. Say goodbye to clean food, water and air.

[@CantoniaCustoms]

Just in case the username wasn't already apparent, t. Democrat

[@TehMorbidAtheist]

@@CantoniaCustoms Triggered Republiklan low IQ beta incel cuck. Need a safe space?

[@sharpe67]

Hey Ketanji! What is a woman ? I’ll wait……

[@thegreen2504]

How would you define a woman?

[@mochiyaya]

@@thegreen2504 that is determined by either the absence or presence of a Y chromosome

[@danceswithbears2521]

​@@thegreen2504A woman is an adult female Homo sapiens, characterized by XX chromosomes.

[@ArchmageMarlock]

I may be able to answer for her. We have the same license for this type of matter. Women are "all the females of the human species. All such females who have arrived at the age of puberty." However, that is modified by the law of what age in a given state someone is or is not an infant. An infant is anyone under 18, normally. That is the legal meaning of what a woman is to any and all lawyers! Remember, law to lawyers, who are smart people by default, is not the same as law to laymen. Look at the comments. People have to guess what a woman is. GUESS! However, unless we are in litigation or there is a genuine issue Lawyers are of one mind.

[@lockwoodpeckinpaugh9252]

​@mochiyaya Wrong. Biology is much more complex then you state.

[@leannramirez5084]

Transcript sucks

[@robertpearson8546]

Chevron cuts into the excess profits.

[@christopherallen9476]

Ah yes, lets let lawyers in congress come up with the metrics that science uses within the various departments. No problems there. I guess republicans like polluted air and water. And if you don't know what I am talking about, then you clearly don't know what The Chevron Doctrine even is.

[@davidhakadoober._1-]

It’s a regulatory tool which was intended to create broad range of restrictions or rules regarding pollution air or otherwise which has now been used ever since to create laws that circumvent the legislative process and create revenue for the epa and other unnecessary agencies. What you fail to understand is that we humans aren’t so stupid and destructive that we would extinct our food and fresh water supplies. Only the oligarchs and their useful idiots would even suggest such a thing. Hunters fishers and farmers are the first and best conservationists of the planet and while your school of thought seeks to create massive solar and wind farms to reduce greenhouse gases, the rest of us want to plant more trees and crops to naturally filter it out so we can breathe in what they put out.

[@ArchmageMarlock]

No, no, no! First, the lawyers in Congress are normally "former" lawyers, non-practicing. Lawyers have a duty to defend their client, but don't mistake that for us agreeing with this nonsense. In law school, lawyers are taught, and we understand we are not technical"experts" in major fields except law. Judges are no different! All of us in the legal field work with other professions to understand what is going on. We have to! That is how we get to understand what is "reasonable" in a culture! This lawsuit is crazy.

[@jessev5761]

This has to due with federal agencies and LEO abuse of citizens and their small businesses. The fact you think this is about pollution has me pressing doubt that YOU KNOW what Chevron Doctrine is.

[@mayorb3366]

Nixon spearheaded and enacted the EPA.

[@CantoniaCustoms]

t. Democrat, obviously.

[@youtubebot6297]

Trump 2024

[@kimp4412]

Prison calling his filthy name

[@c.m.d2651]

Brilliant- Let’s get rid of all the experts ? what good are experts 😂 Hey ?!?! Aren’t lawyers and Judges experts in interpreting the Law ??? if Chevron is overturned it will be a disaster …

[@user-tk5xq3dr2j]

500 E 33RD CHICAGO IL 60616

[@LaughingblueSu]

CONVICTED OF SEXUAL ASSULT The republican choice 😂😂😂

[@fallenseraph5V]

Convicted of beastiailty The Democrats choice.

[@crimony3054]

Who fills the gap? "When the President does it, it's not illegal." --Richard Nixon The problem of ambiguity that the justices articulate is not new.