Thanks for watching! Check out our road trip MPG results with a 4.30 rear differential on TFLnow: kzbin.info/www/bejne/kIDIoGR4q7aKgKM and our off-road Tremor gas vs. diesel comparison on TFLoffroad: kzbin.info/www/bejne/q5jPla2En9qKqNk
@buildriteconstruction26904 жыл бұрын
The Fast Lane Truck Did Ford lower the ride height on the 2020 super duties?
@cody17774 жыл бұрын
@@buildriteconstruction2690 yes, I believe I saw that they did. Something like an 1" in the front and 1 1/4" in the back.
@cody17774 жыл бұрын
Have you guys ever done a milage test comparing tailgate up versus down? They would be interesting to see in addition to doing that test with a cap also.
@andrewhannah80154 жыл бұрын
cody grillaert MythBusters did the tailgate up or down test. Leave the tailgate up for better mpg
@cody17774 жыл бұрын
@@andrewhannah8015 I know they did, I'd like to see TFL do it and introduce a cap to the comparison.
@bearatts4 жыл бұрын
That amazes me, these new heavy-duty trucks get better fuel economy than my 2004 hemi 1500, technology has come a long way in 16 years.
@Rift454 жыл бұрын
bearatts Was thinking the same thing! My 2004 Hemi 1500 got 15 empty
@brianhilligoss4 жыл бұрын
Yeah my 6.2 Silverado gets 14 combined average per tank of mixed use. Best was 18 on the interstate with a good tail wind.
@johncholmes6434 жыл бұрын
Not very hard to beat a Dodge hemi with anything
@Rift454 жыл бұрын
My 2015 Hemi on the other hand got 21.5 on a long flat trip at 60-65mph
@kenleycarlton75624 жыл бұрын
Have the exact same truck. Hemi 04. 240k miles now
@cup_and_cone4 жыл бұрын
Smaller engine Chevy with less geared six speed still did better, despite a slightly heavier trailer... Now that's impressive.
@brandonhouse97224 жыл бұрын
Yeah I like how he added at the end how the Chevy trailer was heavier.
@matthewrobertson1564 жыл бұрын
Based on differential gearing it was able to haul more than this Ford was rated because the Chevy was a 3.73 differential gear versus the Ford 3.55. Don't forget that you're using winter gas and running the heater.
@freedomisntfree_444 жыл бұрын
Cup & Cone gm is weaker there fore not as much fuel
@aarons30084 жыл бұрын
Also the Chevrolet managed that better mpg despite the fact that they used 85 octane (with 10% ethanol) yet for some reason on the Ford they gave it 87 (without ethanol) even though both manufacturers say 87 minimum. I'd imagine if the Chevrolet had gotten the equal fuel it would have been an even larger margin of difference.
@EricFortuneJr.4 жыл бұрын
Matthew Robertson The heat won’t affect fuel economy unless the defrost is on, fuel type maybe, weather conditions for sure and gearing as well.
@ctapmgriley4 жыл бұрын
If port injection is "old school" I guess carbureted is "prehistoric".
@lubesiron-cslfarmsllc27514 жыл бұрын
The tech manuals for carburetors are either chiseled in stone tablets or cave paintings. Lol
@foxbodyguyeightyeight36723 жыл бұрын
That's my problem with the people doing these reviews, they judge trucks on things they don't understand they aren't mechanic's or run fleets and look at downtime numbers. They just blurt out things they don't really understand and everyone walks in lock step based off of it.
@Doomzdayxx2 жыл бұрын
That's a fair categorization. And throttle body injection would be "ancient"
@nathankestin19224 жыл бұрын
Finally the Embargo is over!! Can't wait to see more videos about this truck! Keep up the consistent hard work TFL!!
@nateyoung63314 жыл бұрын
5 star will have their tuned numbers soon.
@TFLtruck4 жыл бұрын
We will publish more Super Duty videos soon.
@hendo3374 жыл бұрын
@@TFLtruck why did they embargo the 7.3 when it was readily for sale on lots and you bought it yourselves? Just seems like the dinosaur print media or whoever Ford was protecting from being scooped has too much lead time and is just proving why new internet media is eating their lunch.
@marvinnicklas76384 жыл бұрын
@@TFLtruck when will you post the Ike Gauntlet videos for the f250 7.3?
@jasonguy65724 жыл бұрын
When towing. Ford 7.3 = 5.65mpg Chevy 6.5 = 6.9 Unloaded Chevy = 16.0 mpg Ford = 15.1
@HVAC_Jae3 жыл бұрын
@Dylan Church Chevy has the new 6.6L gas V8. Add: yes 6.6L not 6.0 or 6.5
@SurelyYewJest4 жыл бұрын
Wow. Didn't expect that outcome. Obviously they can't really match the rear gearing between the 2 brands, but 15.1 out of the Ford on the new 10-speed versus 16.0 out of the Chevy on the old 6-speed. That's an impressive finish for Chevy's new 6.6.
@Thirty-OughtSick2 жыл бұрын
I mean the 350 has a 3.73
@APGJuggernaut4 жыл бұрын
They should've tested these two with the same trailer, on the same day. Guess we'll see how it does on the ike gauntlet.
@samthompson31844 жыл бұрын
Exactly, this video is utterly pointless if they didn't do it in the same day, same trailer, etc.
@joshuaearnheart27564 жыл бұрын
This channel has always been a wee bit biased towards GM. All these comments talking about fuel economy are quite annoying. A Toyota Prius gets better gas mileage than almost anything. But that’s the only thing it does better.
@Bmc10254 жыл бұрын
I am a diehard GM guy and I agree. I still see the GM doing better MPG but I think it would have been close enough it wouldn't be a selling point.
@APGJuggernaut4 жыл бұрын
I do agree that the constant fuel mileage comments can get annoying, especially from private owners that should be fully aware of the cost to operate a full size truck. But given that the 7.3 is intended to be a reliable and economical motor for commercial and fleet operators, grading it heavily on its fuel economy is warranted. I don't think the ratings were terrible given the testing conditions and elevation. But I was expecting it to get a little closer to the Chevys numbers.
@APGJuggernaut4 жыл бұрын
@@Bmc1025 Tow rating, at least to me, seem to vary a lot truck to truck even within the same models. I'll say this much, its getting better mileage than the Ecoboost F-150 I used to own. Loved that truck and the power as much as it loved gas
@1134EMP4 жыл бұрын
Not bad, 20 years ago, I used to have a 97 4x4 f250 with the 7.5L, a 5 speed manual and 3.55 gears. Best mpg I ever got was 13.5. This was with 285/75r16 tires. Most of the time 11-12mpg. That engine was rated 245hp and 410tq. So now we get more power and better economy.
@kinguin7 Жыл бұрын
I've got one with 4.10 gears, 5 speed, stock tire size and it's getting between 10 and 12 usually...
@davidhorne23264 жыл бұрын
Both of them get better empty mpg’s than my ‘05 Tundra! But it’s paid for and suits my need.
@tonynw3184 жыл бұрын
I was gonna say the same about my 2012 4.6l tundra... I've been getting 13.5mpg
@robertsitch14154 жыл бұрын
The gearing on those trucks makes them burn more fuel than you would expect.
@davidhorne23264 жыл бұрын
Si Raff I bought the truck new,and was going on the Toyota reliability. And that has proved true. If I had to buy a new truck it would probably be a Toyota. I worked at a local Chevy dealer until just recently, and saw a lot of issues with the new Chevy’s. The more bells and whistles, the more problems.
@shaunbeach95024 жыл бұрын
A 2019 tundra probably won't be able to get any better gas mileage either.
@davidhorne23264 жыл бұрын
Shaun Beach that’s true. Toyota needs to get the mpg’s up.
@marvinsauer84933 жыл бұрын
It is pretty tough to split mpg tests over several days. Each leg of tests, on both trucks, should be done under near identical ambient conditions, meaning that each leg should be performed at nearly same time on same day. Temperature, atmospheric pressure, humidity, wind and fuel mix all play a role.
@dennyhall692 жыл бұрын
Thank you, glad I am not the only one that seen that. It is harder for a large truck to push through cold air. I noticed that they was bundled up when testing the f250
@JHuffPhoto4 жыл бұрын
Interesting result. The result is consistent with what I would expect. Chevy does a very good job of squeezing efficiency out of their vehicles. However, I would not let a relatively small (really within the margin of error) difference in fuel economy be the deciding factor between these two trucks. There are many other considerations in my opinion. Either vehicle would be a good choice and I think that personal preference in styling and design will likely be big factors in peoples purchasing choices.
@franciscoorozco41464 жыл бұрын
I have always said it, ford’s numbers on paper are always the best, but in real world everything changes
@nilsjohansson97394 жыл бұрын
The 7.3 is kind of falling short in every category for me. Less torque than I expected, less fuel efficientcy than I expected so far. The Chevy is actually doing quite well considering its using a 6 speed.
@kennethbranscum27384 жыл бұрын
I agree. I was hoping the MPG would be a little better with a 10 speed.
@gen-x-zeke84464 жыл бұрын
Do you realize that they did that to get an "out-of-the gate" number, right? People are going to be modifying the heck out of these monsters anyway. I am rare, I love Ford and Chevy and I feel like they make each other greater. I am more of a Ford dude, but I am impressed with RAM's 6.4 HEMI as well. What a trio, 6.4, 6.6, 7.3 like the good old days of big power.
@JsGarage4 жыл бұрын
Christopher Williams 6.4 Hemi is much more appealing with its new 8 speed. The old 66RFE held it back quite a bit not even having a true 6 speed ratio spread.
@acdii4 жыл бұрын
They tested the Tremor on the Dyno, not a good choice for a true dyno test. They would have been better off testing the one in this video on the dyno. The 10 speed is better suited to the 3.55 gearing than the 4.10 or whatever it was on the Tremor. When you look at the dyno on the 6.7 with the 10 speed and 3.55 gears the numbers were off the chart.
@bryane28574 жыл бұрын
@@jamespenner1412 In nearly all the Ikes the Chevy out performs in the HD .
@josephfarrah5794 жыл бұрын
Love Ford bringing big displacement back but I'm with Andre on this one, I expected better.
@bradenreed11524 жыл бұрын
What concerns me is longevity on these 8 and 10 speeds, they do a lot more shifting especially pulling or driving in the hills. Maybe I'm wrong but my basic knowledge on transmissions make me thing more shifting= more wear and potentially more heat?
@workct4102 Жыл бұрын
I have not noticed that. From a 4spd to a 10 spd, 5.4 to a 3.5 EB, the newer truck does stay in 8th most of my towing trips, but the power difference in the engines allows it to stay put, where the 5.4 would kick to 3rd and rev to 4k. Haven't needed the 3.5 up that high yet.
@paullang15054 жыл бұрын
$53,000 for any pickup truck is ridiculous and gluttonous. The rate that pickup truck prices have risen is absolutely crazy. I hope someone takes a serious look at this... It's right in line of paying $100 for sliced up jeans...
@Spahi774 жыл бұрын
I agree....I bought my 15 Duramax ccsb for 51k out the door in Feb of 2015 it was 63k sticker....it was a bit high at the time, but when I see a similarly equipped truck today is close to 80k sticker.....yes, it's glutinous or as some might say, capitalism/ supply/ demand. Definitely not inflation at work. No way can I grabbed a LTZ today in the 50k range...it will correct.
@gregoryfuller93614 жыл бұрын
I agree 100%. I personally don't need a brand new vehicle . If I had the money for a diesel or gas hd truck I'd go between 2005 to 2010 if I could swing it. 50,000 f150's I mean really . Not knocking Ford btw they're all doing it now.
@royrichardson91644 жыл бұрын
Nothing but FACTS! idk care how they are optioned out and how great they try and make them out to be...
@ridethetiger18954 жыл бұрын
Yeah they are a lot of money but if you count in inflation even my 2001 F150 sticker prices was just under 32k new and adjusted for inflation its 48k in 2019 money. Considering all the technology and advances it's really not that bad, it's the cost of living and wages that have not kept up with cost of things.
@dreadnoughtprime63014 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure what you base your statement on. What do you think they should cost and why?
@buckhorncortez4 жыл бұрын
Depending upon the wind - that can really kill mileage. My F350 with a camper averages 12.3 with no wind. On a windy day the mileage can go as low as 9.5 MPG. You need to re-run the test on a day with no wind if you can do that.
@stevenblake69392 жыл бұрын
It was windy for the Chevy too!
@msokes94 жыл бұрын
Good video, interesting results. Both ford and Chevy will still be my favorite 2 truck brands
@marcojordan13684 жыл бұрын
Chevy is my favorite trucks
@liljohnny2.0654 жыл бұрын
Chevy and ford are the best.
@msokes94 жыл бұрын
Lil Johnny2.0 agreed
@frankd.39854 жыл бұрын
Air temperature also makes quite a bit of difference in MPG comparisons. I used to have a Ford extended E-350 with a V-10. In cold weather (20 degrees F) it'd get about 13 MPG with about 3500# of cargo. In 70 degree weather, it'd be up to 16 MPG. If your comparing MPG you have to keep the conditions the same as possible. Also the MPG with a gas engine may be lower, but cost of maintenance and intital cost compared to a diesel is also lower. I've got a diesel that I pull my 5th wheel camper with and I love it, but I don't think you ever get you money back. Thank you for all of your great tests.
@gjolinares232 жыл бұрын
If you did that’s amazing. Those numbers sound quite a bit over shot though. Are you sure you did the math right? The V-10s were said to be around 10mpg empty and drop when hauling weren’t they?
@themartimus17484 жыл бұрын
If the 7.3 coupled up with a 4.30 rear end is any thing like my 6.2 gas it will do great.
@TheMCD19894 жыл бұрын
I just bought a '19 F350 with the 6.2 and 4.30s, so far I love it the only complaint is the god awful mileage. Coming from a 2005 Cummins towing on the highway leaves something to be desired but anything under 50/55 I think the 6.2 is as good if not better than the 6 speed common rail.
@themartimus17484 жыл бұрын
Yeah it took me some time gettin use to a gas motor but I’ve had mine for 5 years now and it’s been the best vehicle I’ve ever owned. It’s got 149000 miles on it and I pull constantly. I’m off road a lot with me job to. I’ve put on 1 front axle , battery. And brakes. Other than that change the oil ($26) and that’s it.
@georgiafan66184 жыл бұрын
The 4.30 would help.
@themartimus17484 жыл бұрын
Yeah man. I like the 4.30
@Danlovestrivium4 жыл бұрын
@@TheMCD1989 That's where the 10 speed might come in.
@icu_corey_rn_9034 жыл бұрын
Glad u guys went with basically a work truck trim f-250 gas it’s something most hard working people could afford rather than a platinum good job
@jonnycash69094 жыл бұрын
Good review. Thanks. Thinking instead of new truck, reinvest in my truck. 96 F. 250 w/460. I can save lil gas and a lot of 💰 when new one is 50K
@mikehaslett37382 жыл бұрын
There is a good video from bad tree productions on one of their trucks. Look it up. They did a Holley sniper throttle body with the factory efi on the 460. Actually worked really well. I think they were around 15/16mpg on it. And a considerable power gain
@ricwestdoesitwork4 жыл бұрын
Glad to see you are finally able to do mileage for the 7.3. Not real bad mileage for that big monster of an engine. Thanks for sharing Andre and Kent enjoyed the review.
@ronaldpalma98124 жыл бұрын
I just can’t get over how damn ugly those chevys are. Goodness!!
@JS-nd1po4 жыл бұрын
It’s great that we have these truck wars as it helps the consumer. I do have to agree that Chevys are butt ass ugly.
@treykolski94114 жыл бұрын
Also thought that but now that I’ve seen in it person really changed my opinion
@treykolski94114 жыл бұрын
J S lot better looking in person in my opinion
@BrackishMongrel4 жыл бұрын
Right! It looks like they just threw their hands in the air and gave up on coming up with a better design.
@DragonKnightX124 жыл бұрын
Saw one in person, it didn’t too bad. The GMC still looks miles better.
@theninja0014 жыл бұрын
These MPG numbers just make me want to hold on to my 1996 Cummins 12v even more! Lol
@jonybravo56504 жыл бұрын
What's your mpgs?
@happydoggs4 жыл бұрын
With my 06 duramax dually towing a 31k lb trailer of hay I got 9.8 mpg on a 77 mile trip with several decent sized hills. And I get about 15 mpg on the same loop with a 15k lb stock trailer. So this test surprised me with how awful the gas mileage is with these modern gas engines towing a trailer
@gbrewer12964 жыл бұрын
MPG will get better as they break in for sure lol
@scaircrow644 жыл бұрын
Hey me too!! With the 4x4, 5 speed 3.50 gears I get 16 city and 20.3 highway unloaded at 65 mph! What in the world is ford doing?!
@chrisdavenport65854 жыл бұрын
@@happydoggs probably not by much.
@taylor55424 жыл бұрын
Considering it's a brick. 15 mpg ain't bad. The chev has a better drag coefficient. I think it'll even out on the ike, when aero is not a factor. 🤙🏻
@tcmtech75154 жыл бұрын
But whats it real world power and MPG numbers once the limp mode comes on due to whatever $1000+ emissions component of the week going out, since that's pretty much how every diesel I have seen built in the last nearing 10 years actually spends most of it life opperatiing running as? OH, wait! It's not a diesel so it doesn't have that problem! :D
@4-LOW4 жыл бұрын
I just can't believe GM made their truck look like a catfish.
@talon08634 жыл бұрын
lol
@Onechrispbacon4 жыл бұрын
The mustang looks more like a catfish lol
@peytonschuldt10454 жыл бұрын
That good sir..... Is spot on.. lol. And I have a chevy..
@cparent20124 жыл бұрын
Just want to say you guys do an amazing job all the time! For future comparison videos, would it be possible to film both trucks on the same day with Mr Truck in the other vehicle to eliminate variables like the wind and weather conditions if it could be done logisticly.
@louisg83893 жыл бұрын
this is the most important youtube channel for truck buyers
@MrDylanMitchell4 жыл бұрын
Great comparison and you're the only one doing doing towing tests. Like to see you add coolant temp and EGT to your tests. EGT is usually a diesel thing but towing it would be interesting to see how gas exgdust temps under load.
@videopipeline64194 жыл бұрын
EGT matters on turbocharged engines because of the boost. EGT is not an issue on naturally aspirated engines, even when towing heavy uphill. Engine oil & trans. oil temps are.
@lanceleavitt7472 Жыл бұрын
Just to put things in perspective, my 454 BBC with an NP 4500 gets 8.2 MPG on the open road, and 7.9 in town. So, your 15 and 16 MPG sound pretty good to me. --- Thanks for the great upload. ---
@TheWolverine-rm2kr4 жыл бұрын
Omg my dad used to work for Cimarron Trailers in Chickasha, Oklahoma!!!
@tomorr1524 жыл бұрын
Nice video guys. One thing I notice when checking gas mileage on my vehicles over the years, is that ambient temperature and wind can make a huge difference. My driving usually takes through Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee so I often see major temperature swings. As the temp goes down so does my mileage. I would really like to see the F-250 test on a warmer day. Enjoy your videos and commentary.
@heatheredwards59334 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to the ike gauntlet!
@randallnorling56794 жыл бұрын
I had a2500 Ram power wagon and I loved the engine in it, it was a 6.4 gas and it would do anything that I needed it to do. Love love love the power wagon
@LondonHasFallin4 жыл бұрын
My father has a 2014 Ford F150. It averages 13mpg. Without a load. (Edit) His truck is lifted slightly and has 35×12R18 tires.
@jase19114 жыл бұрын
He needs to keep his foot off the gas mine gets 16 -22mpg
@marcusmcintire66834 жыл бұрын
That's odd. What octane fuel is he using and does he haul stuff in the back or pull a trailer? Driving short distance lowers mpg's as well like in my '13 F150 with a 5.0L. I drive a 2 mile round trip 5 day's a week and 20 mile round trip on Sunday. My mileage is 7.2 mpg.
@jase19114 жыл бұрын
RIP off the stock exhaust and put in a K&N air filter plus air up your tires to almost max psi that helps immensely
@ZurkeyTurkey4 жыл бұрын
something isnt right with that truck then my average between highway and city is about 17-18mpg
@ZurkeyTurkey4 жыл бұрын
And that's half the reason why I wanna upgrade to an 18+, the fuel economy
@golfbravowhiskey86694 жыл бұрын
My 7.3 wouldn’t get 15 mpg if you dropped it out of an airplane. Running around out in the pasture driving to town averages about 9 to 10 miles a gallon Drove it the other day on the open road with the cruise set at 68 miles an hour averaged about 13.1 with a 355. Still a heck of a lot better than my old 454. Technology has come along ways.
@treverb31834 жыл бұрын
You can't compare tests from different times of year. You need to take into account winter fuel and summer fuel blends. Also air temperature will affect fuel milage. To compare they need to be tested at the same time under the same conditions with the same fuel.
@acdii4 жыл бұрын
Agreed. A truer test would have been them running side by side at the same time, pulling the same weight(GCVW), and then compare. Considering both test runs of the F250 were into the wind accounts for something as well as the winter blend fuel.
@wiks1014 жыл бұрын
@@acdii um they drove a loop so one way was into the wind and the other would be with the wind at your back. so it all cancels its out.
@acdii4 жыл бұрын
@@wiks101 Did they have the same with the other truck? If not, then not a true comparison. Besides, a head wind can really affect MPG more than a tail wind, so it wont really cancel it out unless the tail wind is at least 10 MPH more.
@T51B14 жыл бұрын
@@acdii What a geographical and physics oddity--Into the wind down AND back, in a down and back comparison!
@acdii4 жыл бұрын
@@T51B1 Where did you read they had a head wind both ways? Did they really?
@jedibusiness7894 жыл бұрын
CHEVY WINS AGAIN....nothing beats a LS motor. I get the same mileage with a 6.0 w a 4.10.
@donaldthomas58523 жыл бұрын
MK I have 6.0 with 3.73 and it gets about the same pulling but empty 14 mpg it has 197,000 miles on the engine
@mesanders11133 жыл бұрын
I used to have a 2000 chevy 2500 4x4 6.0 4l80 it got 12mpg on the freeway
@R85DAVID3 жыл бұрын
I love Ford but their engines are over complicated and break down more easily. Chevy is smart, small block pushrod v8’s will never die as long as they keep it simple.
@smsteger893 жыл бұрын
4.10 gearing sucks though
@mikcun27993 жыл бұрын
The 6.6l l8t they tested here was actually not a LS engine. They are a fifth generation sbc like the 6.2l, but are stroked to 6.6l. So they are in the new "LT" engine family.
@RobbDzzz4 жыл бұрын
Since it’s mostly a freeway loop, the weight had less to do with economy than the winds and temps. The comparison to the GM at this point is purely anecdotal. Need same trailer and load with same atmospherics to get a reasonable comparison.
@billiebuckamer81894 жыл бұрын
GMs get better real world gas mileage.
@RobbDzzz4 жыл бұрын
Billie Buckamer based on what evidence?
@anthonyhales41924 жыл бұрын
@@billiebuckamer8189 I agree but its god awful ugly.
@anthonyhales41924 жыл бұрын
My 99 f250 gets 9mpg. ( lifted 33s) empty. I could care less its a great truck. A good engine will only cost you fuel thats it
@chiefbeef29474 жыл бұрын
Robb M the video
@atfsgeoff4 жыл бұрын
Not unreasonable figures, they might improve with break-in and summer blend gas
@jamesnm214 жыл бұрын
Chevy wins: 16 mpg unloaded. 6.9 mpg pulling the trailer. Ford: 15.1 mpg unloaded. 5.6 mpg pulling the trailer.
@jamesdenton54224 жыл бұрын
THE FORD HAD A HEAD WIND WHICH MAKES A BIG DIFFERENCE. AND THE FORD ENGINE IS BIGGER AND MORE POWERFUL. 6.2 VS 7.3. DO THE MATH, THE FORD GETS BETTER FUEL ECONOMY PER LITER OF ENGINE SIZE. I DID THE MATH.
@horuslupercal38724 жыл бұрын
@@jamesdenton5422 found the Ford guy...........
@jamesnm214 жыл бұрын
@@jamesdenton5422 someone said they put 10% ethanol in the Chevy and regular in the Ford though. If that's true the Chevy did even better.
@raionshishi82904 жыл бұрын
@@jamesnm21 That person were probably lying or mixed up, it was the Ford who got the ethanol mix and additives and was driving in cold winter with high wind. The Chevy was in summer with little wind.
@myers3264 жыл бұрын
They ran 85 octane in the Chevy and pulled 16000 vs 14500.F the wind
@oldguysrock21704 жыл бұрын
I have watched many videos with truck comparisons. There are the Ford Guys, Dodge guys, and the Chevy men! When trucks come off of the showroom floors, stuff works. After 100,000 miles, let me see which trucks are still performing at a satisfactory level. New trucks have wat to many bells and whistle gadgets and that leads to more failures. I live in a harsh winter climate 5 months out of the year in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Mechanical door steps, multi use tailgates, auto tailgates, low profile wheels, fancy chrome trim, and lady features! All that stuff fails at -10 and in deep snow with a 100 Libs of ice stuck to the truck. Ford has tons of great tech! Dodge plenty of power with a Yugo transmission! And the Chevy with a check engine light. I got 240,000 on my 02 Chevy Avalanche and it lasted 17 years before I sold it. I bought a 14 Chevy WT 1500 with 100,000 and it works great. Not a lot of bells and whistles, but practical. I just want a rust proof truck, which the manufacturers can make but they won’t.
@darens4404 жыл бұрын
Once again GM proves to have the best gas V8. The rest of the truck is still up for debate. I must say ford did good for port injection.
@rustynail9144 жыл бұрын
Chevy makes a great truck.....this year's front end and mirrors just look like hot garbage.
@icu_corey_rn_9034 жыл бұрын
I’ll hand it to GM they know how to make a solid gas v8 they’ve been doing it since the small block Chevy days
@keithwalters25114 жыл бұрын
I have a 2500 Chevy heavy duty. Mirrors are awesome for visibility around them. The chrome front looks much better. Absolutely love my truck
@stacyadiaz4 жыл бұрын
I loved the longevity of my old 6.0 gas in the 2500HD I had but the 6.2 gas in my current F-250 pulls much stronger. I wished GM wouldn't have waited so long to upgrade the 6.0
@EliteFlight4 жыл бұрын
Arnold D The 6.0 were junk motors. I’ve known people who have blown em up before the 150k mark.
@nhlcfl77332 жыл бұрын
Here’s my 1.5 yr. ownership experience with the 2020 Chevy 2500 experience below. Thanks guys for your test reviews of this and the Chevy. And for your honest reactions that I noticed Andre seemed to hope the Ford Godzilla would do better than the Chevy especially since the Chevy pulled a heavier trailer. I’ve sensed from other videos how Andre likes the “Godzilla” name and all. To keep this peaceful, both essentially get within 1 mpg of each other, how’s that? PS, I own my 2020 Chevy 6.6L gasser and … love it thus far. I get 17-18 mpg US on Hwy and 14-15 city and worse for both in winter. I Love the 82” long standard bed, the front & rear side steps (plus the optional side mounted Bed Storage Boxes leaving 4 ft. Width in my box yet lots of storage = Awesome!!!) direct fuel injection engine with the JD Power proven reliability and beefed up 6L90 transmission for this new 6.6L. Because I live in an area that has +6 months of real winter, I appreciate the AutoTrac transfer case for more secure winter driving.
@Spartan54204 жыл бұрын
48 gallon tank! I I can hear my bank account screaming now 😅
@mdingle114 жыл бұрын
Sure it's a large tank but it uses the same amount of fuel if not less than a tundra which has a 26 gallon tank. Less stops needed to fill up.
@Spartan54204 жыл бұрын
Micheal Dingle agreed.👍
@justinw.23764 жыл бұрын
Micheal Dingle id still hate to be looking at the screen at the pump when I’m filling up from 1/4 tank lol
@loganholmberg22954 жыл бұрын
Gives you allot more range when you need it. My 2014 Sierra 1500 has only 26 gal and I wish it had 30 or more. I've taken it to places in Northern Canada with long distances between fuel stops. Which makes me wonder. How big was the fuel tank on the Chevy they tested? All that extra fuel weight might account for the difference in fuel economy.
@unitedgray4 жыл бұрын
@@loganholmberg2295 Agreed. I love the 36 gal tank on my F-150.
@billstewart24334 жыл бұрын
It shows that V8's are the same as they were 50 (or more) years ago, unloaded 15 mpg. Nothing new under the sun. :)
@snikesnover18314 жыл бұрын
bill stewart and that will be $53,000 thanks here are the keys
@jakecreech16594 жыл бұрын
Bill you gotta remember that these engines have almost twice the output and the trucks weigh 30 percent more than the old ones. I understand what you are getting at though.
@Sorensenator864 жыл бұрын
@@jakecreech1659 ya bill
@smiller2254 жыл бұрын
Except new trucks have twice the power output, way more towing capacity, quicker acceleration better everything and probably better fuel economy
@Andy-eh9qr4 жыл бұрын
The new trucks are also at the mercy of the EPA. They’d use half the fuel otherwise.
@nateyoung63314 жыл бұрын
So imagine gm adding a 10 speed to their new gasser. Might be better than 16 mpg.
@billiebuckamer81894 жыл бұрын
I don't think more gears is always a good thing. I recall on another Gauntlet test one of the two trucks tested had more gears and it kept upshifting and taking the engine out of the power zone. Then the engine would begin to strain and the truck would downshift. It cycled like this the whole way up the mountain...very annoying if I recall. That said, the Ford has good torque so it may not be an issue.
@joseortega5554 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for this video. Now I just have to wait a couple of years to see if either one comes up with problems. Both of them do better than my 2500hd 6.0. I get 14.5 and never go over 65 mph.
@royrichardson91644 жыл бұрын
If I was actually towing weight like that I wouldn't even bother with a 3.55 gear for the 7.3 engine
@codyparker6794 жыл бұрын
I'd go stright for the 430. Gasser l love deep gears
@serfnuts4 жыл бұрын
The 3.55 is only rated to tow 12k I think. The 4.30 can do 15k.
@acdii4 жыл бұрын
The 10 speed makes up for it, it has a really low first gear.
@Purdue03b4 жыл бұрын
@@serfnuts If it was only rated to tow 12k, why did TFL just tow 14.5k?
@Nostradamus_Order334 жыл бұрын
What happened to the 3.73 ?
@chinomustang5504 жыл бұрын
Well I just ordered a 2020 f350 with the 7.3 and I can't wait. I don't get trucks for gas mileage but I'll take 15mpg.
@whispr63314 жыл бұрын
Finally! We have results! Nice vid guys. Imo, the ford could do better, a couple examples on youtube were achieving much better gas mileage but, the real world varies based on altitude, temperature, how flat the road is, etc Depending on where people live, their numbers can be better or they can be worse, im rootin tootin for the the big block Ferd!
@yoddy04 жыл бұрын
Except wouldn’t you assume the same for the competition as well then?
@justinluttrell17694 жыл бұрын
Altitude mostly in this case. I took my V8 F-150 from Florida to ~6,300' elevation and lost about 2mpg hwy.
@firebirdlover44608 ай бұрын
I've never been a Ford guy, but you really can't go wrong with either of these brands. Chevy and Ford definitely make each other better.
@djcarkhuff4 жыл бұрын
7.3 "Godzilla" ....meanwhile..... 2001 GM 8.1 Vortec glares over the top of it's morning paper, sipping coffee quietly.
@4-LOW4 жыл бұрын
The GM 8.1 never sipped coffee. It guzzled oil.
@djcarkhuff4 жыл бұрын
@@4-LOW lol, that's true. I had a '02 crew cab that would casually sip about a quart every 1-2k miles.
@andrewhigley67884 жыл бұрын
OFFRD I’ve got a ‘01 2500hd with the 8.1 and it doesn’t really go through oil real fast but I do get about 8mpg empty 😂😂. But that’s life, I didn’t buy the big block for mpg lol
@benjaminwayneb4 жыл бұрын
8.1 with 100 less HP. then the 7.3.
@braddenr.47784 жыл бұрын
benjaminwayneb built in the early 2000’s there bud. So what it has 100hp less, makes more torque and I can guarantee it’s a hell of a lot more reliable than this not really that impressive 7.3 gas.
@BigBoyToyzz4 жыл бұрын
You had Winter blend fuel in the 7.3 which gives worse MPG. When you tested the Chevy I think you were still in the Summer blend. Big difference in MPG with the two blends.
@remsterx4 жыл бұрын
xelvic congrats welcome to real world testing. You get whatever gas they put in the pumps when you drive. They don’t have control over when they receive the trucks either
@lfsracer794 жыл бұрын
6:24 Semi truck fuel economy
@joshualester27354 жыл бұрын
Some of trucks are hitting 10+ loaded now. Crazy. Our v10 school buses get 7.5 even with all the stops go and idle time. And 8.5 with Cummins. Though the diesels are all being phased out. Too slow, slow heat, and way more maintenance cost. Plus the noise/vibration. The gassers are so much nicer to drive.
@retiredafce33734 жыл бұрын
My 1990 f250 4x4 with the 460 gets 13.2 mpg driving at 60 mph. It has 165,483 miles on the original engine.
@406Steven4 жыл бұрын
You must have the E4OD and 3.73 gears. I had a similar F-250 (regular cab long box, nothing huge) with the 460, C6, and 4.10s and it had a hard time getting double-digit MPGs. I think the best I ever did was around 12 but that's no Overdrive and big gears in the rear end. It would pull anything you wanted it to but sucked gas down. The 460 would do 300k+ miles no trouble, I know plenty of people who used to use them pulling race cars and campers cross-country.
@retiredafce33734 жыл бұрын
@@406Steven it does have the E4OD with 4.10's and stock size tires/wheels. In town it 10mpg.
@nof-bdybs69484 жыл бұрын
Finally. New 7.3 just has not met my expectations in hp, torque, or Mpg.
@tristanhipps6044 жыл бұрын
call it what it is....a clear cut win for chevy. the chevy pulled more weight and got better MPG at the same time. that is huge
@raionshishi82904 жыл бұрын
It didn't need to deal with the conditions the Ford was in tho.
@tristanhipps6044 жыл бұрын
@@raionshishi8290 right it only had to deal with the extra sports car it was towing.
@raionshishi82904 жыл бұрын
@@tristanhipps604 Doesn't make a big enough difference compared to conditions, the conditions of the area matters way more then the weight, have you ever been to a drag strip before ? Those that have been like myself can tell you that conditions really do matter, alot more then what the car is hauling. It can have tons of HP but if it can't put it all to the ground or use it efficiently then there is no point.
@tylerp89514 жыл бұрын
What I can’t figure out is why they used 85 octane on the Chevy and 87 octane on the ford. Is their bias only against GM. Do both of these trucks on the same day WITH THE SAME FUEL.
@SMiller54884 жыл бұрын
Because they tested the Chevy months ago
@tylerp89514 жыл бұрын
SMiller5488 what does that have to do with the octane they used
@GDatum4 жыл бұрын
SMiller5488 maybe they used higher octane in the ford this time in hopes it doesn’t break down going up the Ike like the previous model did last year 🤷♂️😂😂
@gen1c8rs884 жыл бұрын
@@tylerp8951 Warm weather fuel vs cold weather fuel. 85 for the Chevy and 87 for the Ford helps even out thier performances.
@markcarl84763 жыл бұрын
Since you also needed to run mid grade in the Ford that made a fill up even more expensive.
@Stevonoles14 жыл бұрын
Towing less weight and with a 10 speed trans, this truck should have blown the Chevy away. Kinda disappointing.
@johng45274 жыл бұрын
@Bo Brother yeah, i tow a large enclosed trailer regularly. and even with the same truck/trailer combo we never get the same gas mileage. it will always vary with the wind; even cross-winds have a huge effect. something else we have learned is that similar size trucks with comparable power will get vary similar mileage when towing, it's not even noticeable if it has a 6spd, 8spd, or 10spd, although more gears will improve acceleration when loaded heavy.
@davidcoalkey60744 жыл бұрын
"we had some wind" wind makes a huge difference.
@T51B14 жыл бұрын
Your results are pretty much exactly what I expected; comparable but with the 6.6L doing a bit better. Direct injection is simply better from a pure power and efficiency standpoint.
@sargeatlarge24v2 күн бұрын
My 01 Chevy 1500hd gets 11.5 mpg every fill up for over two years now. I think that’s excellent the 7.3 did 15 mpg unloaded. That’s an extra 150 miles out of a tank which will add up quick. These trucks are tremendously out of my price range as I’m not going to spend 60 grand cash on a truck that I’ll destroy in less then three years. The 2010 Nissan frontier looks like my best option as I can get a 6 speed manual and they don’t have many issues. I’m glad I’m matured at 26 and moving past the diesel life. A lot of unnecessary expenses for no reason with diesels plus you can’t even register them once you make them reliable.
@dylanthompson15584 жыл бұрын
Shouldn’t the wind somewhat cancel out? They would have had a tailwind if they had a headwind in the opposite direction
@Danlovestrivium4 жыл бұрын
lol it's not they're in the jet stream! Wind conditions can change quickly and dramatically. Besides, I doubt they were going in a straight line the whole time.
@wiks1014 жыл бұрын
Exactly; They are Ford fanboys so they had to say oh its the wind, The Chevy towed more and got better mileage.
@Matts0004 жыл бұрын
ChicagoSox give your head a shake! I could run that Chevy on 3 different runs on different days of the week and I bet I would get different MPG results each time. Same for the Ford, that’s what happens when you have real world testing. And I hate to tell ya, but that Ford when properly equipped can tow and hall more than that Chevy.
@dylanthompson15584 жыл бұрын
Matt S the Ford can definitely tow, but after watching these videos for a few years they always say the result is the result due to real world testing. This is the first time I’ve seen them make an excuse for the Ford
@Matts0004 жыл бұрын
Dylan Thompson that is true
@sammysampson1834 жыл бұрын
I have a 01' SuperDuty 4x4 with the 6.8 V10. With over 130K miles on the clock it gets 14 mpg at 65 mph empty and when I towed my 11,000 lb trailer from Seattle to Maine, I averaged 8.5 mpg for the 3,200 mile trip. My truck weighs 7,800 lbs empty. Considering that it is in great shape and paid for, I would be hard pressed to buy new when the fuel consumption numbers are not any better.
@tazchapman6924 жыл бұрын
Hey @The Fast Lane Truck, Can you do this test again with one of the higher level 7.3L Super Duties, with ECO switched on and off in both scenarios as a comparison? I'm curious if that actually makes a difference! Thanks, Awesome content as always!
@zachengland35933 жыл бұрын
Thank you guys! These real world reviews are truly a God send.
@ashes2ashes8634 жыл бұрын
So much for the 10 speed giving it an edge... Also caught that they said the truck floated from 7 th gear to overdrive and back a lot. Maybe that's why GM kept the old 6 speed. These trucks were built for reliability first after all. I'm sure they are all making less power than they could too for reliability purposes.
@curtis19514 жыл бұрын
Agreed. The gm trucks have always been about the total package. They have always been competitive despite not having the highest numbers.
@Welcometofacsistube4 жыл бұрын
Lol GM and reliability?
@matthewrobertson1564 жыл бұрын
I factor in the differential gear. That Chevy test was a 3.73 rear end. This Ford is running on winter gas with probably the heater running and on 3.55 gearing which is crazy for pulling this much weight.
@curtis19514 жыл бұрын
@@Welcometofacsistube The only two trucks that had reliability problems on the Ike gauntlet were Ford's.
@arbiter14 жыл бұрын
@@Welcometofacsistube um GM 6.0 liter? that thing built like a tank. My uncle had a work truck with it and it had 350k miles on it and still was going strong.
@CJColvin4 жыл бұрын
This is awesome battle of the Big Block V8 mate. Ford 7.3L Godzilla V8 vs GM 6.6L Ecotec gas V8.
@chriswinkler13134 жыл бұрын
Can we do the Ram 6.4l next??
@chrisperry17564 жыл бұрын
Idk why people seem to think 15mpg isnt a great number for a big block 3/4 pick up. That's freaking good!!!! My half ton with a 5.0 small block only gets about 10mpg. 12 if theres no headwind. Like what do yall expect it to get? 23mpg? 30mpg?
@HioSSilver19994 жыл бұрын
Very similar mpg's to what i seen in my old 2500 6.0 Silverado with 4.10s when it was stock.
@MSparks95094 жыл бұрын
Please run the MPG towing loop with this truck/Cimmaron trailer to see how it compares to the 7.3 with 3.55 gears.
@brinkme17724 жыл бұрын
I get 13mpg in my '11 f250 2wd w/ 6.2 gasser ... I'd call 15mpg a decent improvement.
@tytomlinson78314 жыл бұрын
Another great vedio guys. I don't recall. Did the Chevy also require midgrade fuel?
@lamboguy79644 жыл бұрын
That silverado won the JD power awards for the most ugliest truck ever made!
@k3v015Mk4 жыл бұрын
Hey an award is an award
@philtripe4 жыл бұрын
@@leonardrice1500 the Ford ...with the bigger, faster motor? must be one of those fake news people that see facts and just come to the opposite conclusion
@justinw.23764 жыл бұрын
Just think, GM paid JD power to give them that award lol
@davidk18504 жыл бұрын
Where's the annoying guy in the commercial talking about the initial ugly award? lol
@fargonianproductions27674 жыл бұрын
2big 2fail who cares if the motor is bigger or faster, the Chevy can tow more
@swpa87424 жыл бұрын
I think it’s worth mentioning the 4 door cab weights a lot more then a standard cab, sometimes by as much as 1000 pounds.
@survivalguyfyi57184 жыл бұрын
Would be nice to see them tow the same weight at a more fuel efficient speed. I usually tow around 60 mph with my f350 dually 6.0.
@TdrSld4 жыл бұрын
I think that's one of the biggest problems in their test, they do it at speed. Most people pulling that heavy of a load in a gas (hell even in a diesel) would be 60-65mph for safety and control of the load. Also the Chevy was done in summer and lite winds, the poor Ford got winter fuel (packed with additives and maxed on Ethanol) and high winds. I can tell you all about how high winds effects MPG, I live on the South Texas Coast. We see 20mph + winds very regularly, my 2010 Tundra unloaded driving into that high wind will make 8-9mpg @60mph and 5-6mpg @75mph. But if we get a very calm day of wind, I get 20.8mpg @60mph and 16-17mpg @75mph. Best I have very got was 24.276mpg @60mph with at least a 25mph wind at my back on a trip up to San Antonio. My combined over the 2 years I've had the truck is 13.295mpg, that's about a 35% highway and 65% city driving. Right now on winter blend I'm pulling 10.8-11.9mpg in the city around here, in summer months I get 12.7-14mpg in the city (summer fuel here has almost no ethanol at all, too hot for it to stay in the tanks). So fuel is a big play just as wind is.
@TheVenom83434 жыл бұрын
survivalguy, my 6.0 powerstroke brother!! Yeah, towing my 5,500 lb camper, I run 65 MPH max. I own an 04 F250 6.0. I don't see how these people run 75-80 MPH safely!
@chuk27954 жыл бұрын
55 60 makes more sense than 70 for sure . The roads by my are so curvy you cant tow above 50
@jamesorr24044 жыл бұрын
60 MPH in the Ford is WOT LOL
@johnbrown20304 жыл бұрын
@@TheVenom8343 to answer your question ive been wrencing on a fleet of over 800 super duties in the harshest environment known to man ( the oilsands in northern canada ) since 2002 and can say they have gotten WAY more capable over the years , multiple brake upgrades, fully boxed frames, and way more tech as far as electronics (trailer anti sway , advancetrac etc..) the 2020's ride is far more capable then the 2002's (but i still like the simplicity of my 2009 v-10 ... )
@juanestrada38744 жыл бұрын
Great video, but I believe most people that are looking at super duty gas trucks are NOT pulling 14,500 lbs-16,000 lbs. Trailers. Most trailers are in the vicinity of 8,000-10,000 lbs. At the heavies, maybe 12,000. I understand what you guys are trying to prove by testing the towing claims of these manufacturers. But we would love to see some realistic tow trailers. Thank you guys, you guys have some great videos!!!
@curtis19514 жыл бұрын
Now if the Chevy beats it in a 0 to 60 towing test, that would be hilarious. 😂
@chrishansen70044 жыл бұрын
The Chevy is a 6.6L and the Ford is a 7.3L your kind of stupid the bigger the displacement the more gas you use I’d argue the ford is doing better than the Chevy considering the ford has 45 more cubic inches
@cooper65854 жыл бұрын
Well, based off of the 7.3 absolutely DEMOLISHING the Chevy up the hill now, I think we're safe on that not happening lol
@curtis19514 жыл бұрын
@@cooper6585 Yep. With the extra power, gears and lower rear gears it looks like a pretty good puller.
@co10034 жыл бұрын
Not happening! Lol!
@glasserallen4 жыл бұрын
This is pretty simple here folks GMC 6.2 l is a 377 cubic inch and Ford 7.3 445 cubic inch you can't compare the gas mileage of a 377 to a 445 just like back in the day trying to compare a 454 Big block to a 350 Chevy gas mileage bigger cubic inch motors of course. Worse gas mileage on this test the Ford for having a much bigger cubic inch motor did not get a dramatically worse MPG rating so I would definitely stick with a Ford.
@shaun3274 жыл бұрын
It's all physics when it comes to towing . Every truck is going to get similar mpg. What's more important in my opinion is brake distances, merge lane acceleration and overall handling.
@philtripe4 жыл бұрын
is that why trucks twenty years ago got half the gas mileage? im going to send you a brain in the mail...you can stick it in your ear
@shaun3274 жыл бұрын
I wasn't really referring to 20 year old trucks. Even so whatever truck your using to tow 14K pounds with, it just takes that much gas (energy to move it). Yes technology has changed and i'm not arguing that. If you took a 20 year old truck and strapped 14K trailer to it, I'd bet it would still get similar mileage towing as the new ones,.. single digit mpg. Technology or not it just takes fuel, the new ones of course do tow better. So yes a 20 year old truck would not get anywhere near the same mileage empty if that is your point, however I said when towing, not overall mpg.
@snikesnover18314 жыл бұрын
My 2002 F250 with the 5.4 gasser can get 16+ mpg in the summer, and handle a 12,000 lb GVWR with plow and sander in the winter. It’s time to upgrade, but $53k is a tough pill to swallow.
@jasonmasters96534 жыл бұрын
@@philtripe and the funniest comment of 2020 goes to...... 2big 2fail
@rustynail9144 жыл бұрын
Not true. Different fuel systems and ignition systems can improve the energy lost by the fuel consumption of the engine. The modern engine is still only about 30% efficient. The rest of the gasoline is lost in the form of heat. Being able to capture more energy and use the gasoline more efficiently is constantly improving.
@TRB02ss4 жыл бұрын
Those trucks get same mpg than my 2012 tuned dmax . Thats impressive.
@airlite444 жыл бұрын
Put a 16000 lb trailer behind the ford like you did the Chevy
@deeshotta70764 жыл бұрын
airlite44 why if the Chevy had more weight and still beat it theres no point
@yzhang86294 жыл бұрын
It is above the gooseneck tow rating of a F250 with 7.3V8 and 3.55 rear axle. www.ford.com/cmslibs/content/dam/brand_ford/en_us/brand/resources/general/pdf/guides/20Towing_Ford_SuperDutyPU_r1_Nov7.pdf
@mechanic6843 жыл бұрын
@@yzhang8629 yes and the Chevy was going up very steep hills all the time it was going through the test. 😅
@peterrock28384 жыл бұрын
My 2017 6.2 with a 6 speed does much better - I will stick with the 6.2. Not much difference in HP and Torque. Unloaded and stock, I get 17 mpg through the mountains of NC.
@BigInjun054 жыл бұрын
So your comparing a test where you wore a t-shirt to one that you have snow on the ground. 👌👌👌 because cold weather doesn't affect mpg at all. Mpg in winter is 12-22% difference. Get the chev back out and try again. Air density change etc. Cant compare yet.
@MattSmith-vl8zp4 жыл бұрын
I hate when they test during the winter. I know they really do t have a choice but cold weather really affects mpg.
@UvidCo4 жыл бұрын
Cold weather also produces more power.
@BigInjun054 жыл бұрын
@@UvidCo less energy efficient in winter. Only electric makes more power and not electric cars either thanks to our battery tech. Does make more power, just takes more fuel.
@billiebuckamer81894 жыл бұрын
The Ford is pulling less weight so I don't see much of a difference.
@brucelee644854 жыл бұрын
I would be interested in seeing a towing test done with the premium unleaded fuel just for interests on if the mileage gets better when using the high octane fuel. Thanks for the video!!
@harveyschindler95542 жыл бұрын
High octane does not directly mean more power. It allows higher compression motors to use fuel more efficiently ( less preignition).
@Mikemartin9684 жыл бұрын
Seems like they were making a lot of excuses for that F-250. 🤣
@marshallhamelwright64104 жыл бұрын
Only question is where did Mr. Truck get that jacket?!? Looks so damn good and I need it!
@aarons30084 жыл бұрын
@TFL why was 87 octane (without ethanol ) used for the ford but 85 octane (with 10% ethanol) was used for the Chevrolet?
@A_Man_Of_Culture_4 жыл бұрын
The different fuel grades do literally nothing for power, the higher octane just makes it less likely to detonate.
@arbiter14 жыл бұрын
@@A_Man_Of_Culture_ The Ethanol even though its only 10% does effect economy. It won't effect it much but there is still an effect i got an 07 truck that is flex fuel, its reg gas vs e85 numbers are difference of i think was 20% loss using e85. Its only 10% in this case but still gonna hurt a small bit in fords favor.
@paul.s96774 жыл бұрын
I caught that also i thought it was just me. They did use 85 .When they did that I was said ewww no. So the chevy gets better mpg on cheaper gas go figure .Way to go Chevy !
@donleamon86534 жыл бұрын
A Man of Culture so you obviously know nothing about engine detonation management. 🙄
@gen1c8rs884 жыл бұрын
@@paul.s9677 The Chevy was tested with warm weather fuel vs cold weather fuel for the Ford. 87 octane helps compensate for worse quality fuel and make the test more equal.
@ck1abe5152 жыл бұрын
Does both engines have the fuel management system? Say if the Ford doesn't but the chevy does, that could be the reason 🤔, but in reality 1 mpg isn't much of a difference, especially considering the big 1 liter difference in motors, well technically, .7, but just a thought. Thanks great video as usual 👍🏼
@jackcurrence2634 жыл бұрын
Ideally, the GM and the Ford could have been tested on the same day (or even at the same time, for the unloaded test!) in order to eliminate weather/wind as a variable, but we (unfortunately) don't live in an ideal world. I admit to being pretty intrigued by the new 7.3L Ford gasser, but it is REALLY difficult to compete with GM on OHV gas V8s... that has been their bread and butter for YEARS, with no forays into OHC architecture, etc... to take engineering dollars away from the OHC V8 program(s).
@sly92632 жыл бұрын
I don't think it's difficult for Ford to compete with it.. GM is now in 3rd place for truck sales, behind even Ram. Ford is still the only manufacturer that makes their own engine, transmission, and axles. Also the 7.3 torque curve is superior to the 6.6 and has forged internals- forged crankshaft. The Silverado is still using a 6 speed on their gas v8...
@CortJohnson2 жыл бұрын
Add up the numbers dude. When GMC and Chevy trucks are combined they easily outsell Ford. The 6 so is a proven workhorse. We’ll see how the 10 does
@sly92632 жыл бұрын
@@CortJohnson please explain the logic in how using two truck brands with double the overhead for manufacturing that barely leads Ford when combined is somehow meaningful... lmfao IDK why some fanboys are so desperate to claim #1 with an obscure and meaningless calculation. GM can't sell 1 pickup line anywhere close to F-series or Ram.
@zimks2 жыл бұрын
@@sly9263 GM just sold more trucks last month than Ford and Ram. It’s as simple as that.
@camclarke99522 жыл бұрын
@@sly9263 sounds like the only fan boy is you,,and ford has never outlived a Chevy truck,,do your research before you embarrass yourself anymore..
@gloppy1014 жыл бұрын
Not tested under the SAME conditions.
@David-yy7lb4 жыл бұрын
Who want a transmission that's hunts through 7-10 gears all the time.....
@gen-x-zeke84464 жыл бұрын
As long as you're not dealing with too many hills, then you won't be worrying about 7-10. My buddy is a mechanic and he's probably 75% reliable which I can say more for some people.
@JS-nd1po4 жыл бұрын
Thats one issue I have with GM truck transmissions. They don’t like to shift and they will sit in a gear and high rev unless you punch the gas.
@tedschmitt1784 жыл бұрын
After having a F-150 with the 10 speed and towing 6200 pounds, and trying to tow that same 6200 pounds with a 6-speed F-150, I will take the 10 speed ALL DAY LONG. Period.
@mattg79524 жыл бұрын
The EPA.
@oscarmayer98234 жыл бұрын
This was good to watch but if you test brands, test on same day with same trailer with identical rear gears. I know a lot of viewers that are saying this same thing. Might be different results
@donleamon86534 жыл бұрын
Oscar Mayer they do their best, but get what they get when they can. Gives you an idea though based on the consistent loop. It’s not like you’re going to see a 5-10 mpg variance.
@linger20014 жыл бұрын
So you’re gonna be stopping for gas about every 250 miles. “I needed to stretch my legs anyway.”
@406Steven4 жыл бұрын
I stop for gas about every 250 miles or so in my F-250, and 250-300 miles in my Impreza. Unless the Mrs is coming along, then we're stopping every 1-1.5 hours for a pee break and might as well top off the tank while we're stopped.
@doctube20204 жыл бұрын
GM needs to add the 10 speed to the 6.6L. The light duty half ton 10 speed auto was a joint venture between Ford and GM
@rlhmarines4 жыл бұрын
DocTube ..The HD 10 speed in the F250/350 is not the same as the Allison 10 speed in the Silverado 2500/3500 Duramax. The 1/2 ton trucks do share the GM/Ford joint venture light duty 10 speed transmission but they went in separate directions for the HD's.
@doctube20204 жыл бұрын
rlhmarines True. I know they worked on the 10 speed together for the half ton truck and suv. I assume the HD 10 speed is based on the lighter duty 10 speed but with upgraded components. Fun fact: GM has built Allison transmissions for years, GM sends the transmission to Allison to have it validated to meet their standards and receive the Allison branding. www.tfltruck.com/2018/12/2020-chevy-silverado-hd-allison-transmission/
@gen1c8rs884 жыл бұрын
@@doctube2020 Ford's HD 10-speed is externally larger than the F-150 10-speed.