WATCH NEXT 👉Foucault POWER AND KNOWLEDGE 📚 kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKPUdKd-iNGUd7M
@jeremylandry853 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this. I am a visual learner, so watching videos is easier for me to understand than dragging through a textbook. I have a deeper grasp on Foucault's thinking now, and I appreciate these videos! Please keep up the great work!
@GreatBooksProf3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this comment, Jeremy. I’m so happy to hear you found the videos helpful!
@RobNotANumber3 жыл бұрын
Perfect.... finally!! wish I could study under you. Foucault's writings should be required reading for anyone looking to enter the public political sphere.
@GreatBooksProf3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Rob!
@anthonybrett2 жыл бұрын
Should those who want to enter the political sphere also sign a petition to legalize underage sex with 'consenting' children?
@Nietzsches-Disciple Жыл бұрын
Foucalt is footnotes to Nietzsche and I bet doesnt give Friedrich credit as much as he shouldp
@analogalien651 Жыл бұрын
@@anthonybrett where the hell did that come from?
@anthonybrett Жыл бұрын
@@analogalien651 Jesus dude, seriously? Have you not read up on Foucault's love of "children"? Especially little boys? The guy was smart but he was also a depraved wack job.
@theintegrator2 жыл бұрын
This and your companion vid on power and knowledge lay out foucault’s complex ideas clearly and directly. Not an easy job, in such a limited space. Thanks for your work.
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! Thanks for watching!
@phonkycapybara8990 Жыл бұрын
I tried reading this last year and had no clue what was going on, so thank you so much! This has been unbelievably helpful:)
@GreatBooksProf Жыл бұрын
Happy to hear it. Thanks!
@cklee6122 жыл бұрын
So clear and concise for getting into Foucault. Thanks a lot!
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Ivan! I try to make these videos accessible, so I'm glad to hear you find them helpful.
@matthanks13033 жыл бұрын
My most worthwhile subscription. Glad to have you as an educator!
@GreatBooksProf3 жыл бұрын
That’s very kind of you to say, Matt. Thanks!
@poornakamalaprairial920 Жыл бұрын
Thank you. I am french and I need to read it. Merci.
@jackryan18092 жыл бұрын
Your video help me pass my final exam. Thanks !
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
Happy to hear that! Congratulations.
@jonathanlister56446 ай бұрын
Very nice exposition of this work by Foucault. I also found The Birth of the Clinic to be a real eye-opener. Have you a discussion of The Archaeology of Knowledge?
@sanchezlourdes968210 ай бұрын
Amazing video! Now I can start reading the book Thank u so much for the content, great as always🙌💫
@shaleenriar9 ай бұрын
You explain so well! it helped me understand better and be ready for my exam. Thank you
@skyway7582 Жыл бұрын
Fantastic explanation,translation….Welcome to the Panopticon!
@GreatBooksProf Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I appreciate it.
@TheBadpav Жыл бұрын
Your content is very underrated.
@GreatBooksProf Жыл бұрын
Thanks! I don’t know… I think I might be properly rated. 😂
@poison64912 жыл бұрын
this is a wonderful summary of the book! very useful to be able to show people to introduce the ideas without pleading with them to read it lol. thank you
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I'm glad you found it helpful.
@pucanga7880 Жыл бұрын
Very good! I am creating a performance around the subject of the Panopticon and this was very useful!
@kylehandrahan69532 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much! Foucault I found was unusually difficult to understand and I needed significant help and explanation outside just reading his writings.
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
He’s difficult for sure. I’m glad you found the video helpful. Are you reading Foucault for a class at university?
@kylehandrahan69532 жыл бұрын
@@GreatBooksProf Yes sir I'm in contemporary theory as a 3rd year, I have an excellent teacher but being in an online only class leaves something to be desired. Having an additional perspective on and explanation of the material is very helpful Thank you again!
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
My pleasure. Good luck with your courses!
@sophieheartsmcfly2 жыл бұрын
Such a helpful video. Thank you so much!
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
You’re welcome, Sophie. Thanks for watching!
@english4freedom Жыл бұрын
Thank you for a great video!
@GreatBooksProf Жыл бұрын
You’re welcome! Thanks for watching.
@JPBGdeSouza3 жыл бұрын
Hey Professor! Great video! In my opinion I think that you should’ve mentioned the importance and impact that Bentham’s Panopticon has had in other institutions such as hospitals, schools and workplaces. Also the relationship between delinquency and the prison system. The factory of delinquency. Of course the video might be too long then, but it’s worth mentioning.
@GreatBooksProf3 жыл бұрын
Thanks very much. I've been thinking I might dedicate a whole video to the Panopticon later this year.
@saraht3462 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this video. I am brazillian and was abble to understand everythind you said, your diccion is relly refined but easy to understand. Your videos helps me a lot in my University works, so Thanks, keep going
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
Hi Sarah, You're very welcome! Thank you very much for the comment. I'm glad you found the videos helpful. Good luck with your school work!
@padairmacleod52607 ай бұрын
Fantastic video! Thank you.
@dantradingalerts12922 жыл бұрын
Nice summary - and i like that paisley tie!
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Danny! It's my most-complimented tie!
@LudwigZand3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the great video! We read parts of Foucault‘s works in our Cultural Studies class and I found them really fascinating. (Also your videos got me interested in Shakespeare and so I ended up buying a collection of his works.)
@GreatBooksProf3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Lukas! I find Foucault really fascinating (and really frustrating!) too. 😂 Glad to hear you're taking an interest in Shakespeare. He's my all-time favourite writer. His plays can be a challenge to read too, but I've learned more from his works than I have from anything else I've read.
@LudwigZand3 жыл бұрын
Do you have a recommendation for a new Shakespeare reader? So far I’ve read Macbeth (thoroughly enjoyed it) and Romeo and Juliet. I have to say that I quite enjoy the way his plays are written. For me personally it is just a joy to read older English literature. Oh, and I somehow have a feeling that your Shakespeare recommendation won’t be Tempest ;)
@GreatBooksProf3 жыл бұрын
@@LudwigZand I would suggest Twelfth Night, Midsummer Night's Dream, and Julius Caesar. Good places to start and great plays. You can skip The Tempest for now! 😆
@truumoo10702 жыл бұрын
this video saved my life
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
Happy to help!
@ndenman420 Жыл бұрын
The Man Who Was Thursday - G.K. Chesterton. Great Book!
@milocontreras15352 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Your videos are incredible
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
That’s really kind of you! Thanks for watching. I’m glad you find them worthwhile.
@kernel1kadafi8 ай бұрын
Great video but can you quote the pages when quoting
@francisb.bilaro29913 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the great insights.
@GreatBooksProf3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome! Thanks for watching.
@NEPALAYA185 Жыл бұрын
Hy, thanks for the video. I was searching for focault contributions, but since many of his article requires subscription, do you have any idea where i can have access to his articles? It would be much helpful. :)
@taren1d2 жыл бұрын
thank you so much i was so lost 😭
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
It’s a pretty confusing book. Glad you found the video helpful!
@paulmark97 Жыл бұрын
great video!
@nigel65deck2 жыл бұрын
I love these videos
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Is Foucault a particular interest of yours?
@jensphiliphohmann1876 Жыл бұрын
06:40: They are kind of "extended selfishness" (extended because the single apparatchik is not benefited by me being productive) and thus care about my mental health not for my own sake but for that of the state. However, that's great because it means that my well- being is useful and therefore it doesn't take "edel, hilfreich und gut" (Schiller) people to maintain it which is a flimsy base to live on.
@Dmanstorm353 жыл бұрын
A great mind and analysis on display. Divine. Thank you sir.
@GreatBooksProf3 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Glad you liked it!
@thomaspeer1778 Жыл бұрын
Hey Prof, I am currently struggling to find modern analysis of Samuel Huntington's "Clash of Nations?" thesis for my 4th year paper. In my essay, I am discussing other theories of the time, including Fukuyama, and providing data and criticisms mostly levied at the theory in the early to mid-2000s. I would appreciate some additional perspectives on this topic. I'll be done with the paper soon lol, but I think there is a lack of modern analysis of the theory. I keep seeing many Indian youtube online educators talking about it, but I can't seem to find any in English within the past 4 years.
@marialyndumal-in Жыл бұрын
Can i ask sir what is paradigm of life od michel faucault on his book discipline and ounishment🥲🙏
@ChanningChan Жыл бұрын
I have trouble in understanding the meaning of the sentence“The soul is the prison of the body” in this book.Do you care to explain it for me?Appreciate it.
@robertshows5100 Жыл бұрын
Great looking tie
@GreatBooksProf Жыл бұрын
Thanks! It’s my most complimented tie. 😂
@jessicajordas62592 жыл бұрын
omg thankyouuuu ❤
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
No problem. I got you. 😆
@jessicajordas62592 жыл бұрын
Hoping that you post a video about Jacques Derrida Deconstruction Theory☺. I really enjoy your video because you explained well. I'm glad that i find your youtube channel it helps me a lot☺
@mrgood837811 ай бұрын
nice tie
@GreatBooksProf11 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@steveredican5 ай бұрын
I somewhat disagree. The main point is that only those in power, whether it be a government or a church, for example, have given them selves the sole authority to punish. When you punish outside of those power brokers, then you have committed an unlawful act, according to those in power. It’s a form of extreme subjugation that all societies have endured under the lie that it is done in order to keep society together. However, it is done to keep the power with the powerful. Whether that punishment be torture and death or the penitentiary system.
@aleezaisawesome2 жыл бұрын
Is Bentham's Panopticon model architectural and symbolic or just one?
@stephanieslater53343 жыл бұрын
Do you think Foucault's use of Bentham’s Panopticon a useful metaphor for understanding the effects of modern surveillance?
@fathertimegaming176 ай бұрын
I know this video is 2 years old, but I hope you have fixed that ring light reflection on the pictures by the door. That is all.
@GreatBooksProf6 ай бұрын
@@fathertimegaming17 Got it under control now. Thanks! 😄
@mejusthappyrobot10082 жыл бұрын
"...YUCK!..." so funny
@GreatBooksProf2 жыл бұрын
😄
@joeroganpodfantasy422 жыл бұрын
That method although brutal was necessary, if they just sent that person in a jail cell to live comfortably like they do in prisons in Norway people might kill the king just to escape poverty. Everything is part of the times, humans were poor and brutal then so the methods of punishment needed to leave a scar in the public eye so that didn't happen again.
@benquinneyiii794110 ай бұрын
Tiered system
@GeorgWilde2 жыл бұрын
What's wrong with productivity? Foucalt gave us argument, that we not only don't need democracy to have functional social structure, but also that we never had it really.
@jensphiliphohmann1876 Жыл бұрын
But capital punishment is violence, and isn't it the opposite of actual power, according to Arendt?
@intello8953 Жыл бұрын
Violence? If someone murdered or raped one of my family members I damn sure want the death penalty to be used on them
@BizRasam Жыл бұрын
Is it me or are modernist like Foucault just pointing at the change without any answers? ... How can the sovereign not exist? Is a cook no longer to cook?...:) Thanks for the videos.
@inesvillalvagandara79516 ай бұрын
Ehrenmann
@joeroganpodfantasy422 жыл бұрын
Everything in modern society is serving capitalism love it or hate it. China seems to me has a better system
@BlackBeltMonkeySong10 ай бұрын
Listening to the buzz around Foucault is kinda sad. What do we have here: * Things were different in the past... so we can change them in the future (lol) * We've moved from punishing the body to the soul. But have we really? Isn't pushing the body a way of punishing the soul. As in: it is really going to hurt. My guess is that missing from the analysis is: * The timelessness of mental illnesses. * How cultural notions of punishment interplay with the sociobiological role of punishment. The last is heresy, because Foucault is only popular because he's grist for relativists. Question: Is there *ANYTHING* Foucault wrote about that wasn't said more clearly by previous scholars? Durkheim anyone?
@convenientEstelle8 ай бұрын
What is "The timelessness of mental illnesses" and what does this have to do with crime?
@BlackBeltMonkeySong8 ай бұрын
@@convenientEstelle mental illness is part of natural human variation. The video talks about mental illness at about 6:30. The video goes wrong here, because its debatable whether mental health talk really has anything to do with mental health at all, and isn't merely the cultural equivalent of SJGould's spandrel, but for the social dynamics of team building and status seeking.
@convenientEstelle8 ай бұрын
@@BlackBeltMonkeySong even with your precision of it being part of "natural human variation", I struggle to see how someone could call it "timeless". Mental illness is a construct. It's a way of interpreting individuals' behaviors. It doesn't mean that those behaviors aren't real, but it also doesn't point to anything else than the interpretation.
@BlackBeltMonkeySong8 ай бұрын
@@convenientEstelle by that standard, we could say hunting, killing, and eating animals isn't "anything else than an interpretation of behaviour".
@convenientEstelle8 ай бұрын
@@BlackBeltMonkeySong Sorry, I think I was too vague and not descriptive enough. By constructing a mental illness, one tries to assign a mental construction to a behavioral pattern, by trying to reconstruct parts of the patients' mind outside of its body (still from behavioral patterns) to be analyzed as a thing in itself, the "mental illness". So for the hunter example, one could try to construct a "hunter's mind" to try to explain the behaviors and habits of a hunter hunting, killing, and eating animals. So what determines what is an illness?
@Johnconno Жыл бұрын
Damiens was much better looking than that. Before the punishment...
@MacSmithVideo Жыл бұрын
Foucalt seems too obvious to me, especially after reading Nietzsche.
@oswurth8774 Жыл бұрын
This guy looks like Simon Cowell after he got his plastic surgery
@GreatBooksProf Жыл бұрын
Hey thanks! That’s just my face. You gotta play the cards you were dealt.
@moxavenger9 ай бұрын
Sorry, my Pop (not a philosopher) said *"We put criminals in prison to keep them away from the law abiding citizens."* I think Foucault overthought this point.
@xasm8311 ай бұрын
super boring book whose idea could be expressed in 50 pages text, thou his observations worth the attention in general