The fact that the USAF publicly announced that they flew a prototype of this jet last year is just beyond amazing, they probably already have the final model of it
@VincentNajger12 жыл бұрын
Check out the X-36. This tailless design was already perfected in the late 1990s......the basic design and flight controllers are already a quarter century old. That blows my mind.
@ericclausen67722 жыл бұрын
There not the last but a continuous upgrade.
@reginaldmctinface79102 жыл бұрын
loyd austin may have already seen a mock-up or flight test at tonopah
@NarasimhaDiyasena2 жыл бұрын
Lot of this tech is reverse engineered from Roswell and incorporates an evolution of earth based jet propulsion which is inferior compared to that produced from Zeta Reticuli. The F-117 design is similar that the craft at Roswell, according to the daughter of an officer in charge of the R&D who kept a cryptic journal for her to later read. You can see the R&D come to fruition in the Naval Patents posted under Salvator Pais. In contrast the iconic Flying Saucer UFO is the Huanebu, which is the reverse engineering of Vimana’s from the Bharat Civilization (8,000BCE-2,000BCE) . The Bell shape on top of every Hindu Temple represents a Vimana. The SS E-IV (Entwicklungsstelle 4), which was an R&D Unit to the SS’s Occult “Order of the Black Sun”, was tasked in researching alternative sources of energy to allow for the Reich to achieve Energy Independence. This research was done in conjunction with the Thule Society who were in search of the Aryan Origins, being the Gods of Indo-European ‘myth’, leading them into India and Tibet where they obtained the knowledge to produce the iconic ‘Flying Saucer’.
@sirius24472 жыл бұрын
True
@Fearls12 жыл бұрын
The F22 was designed in the early 80's. Can you imagine what we have now, that is classified? It's all drones from here out, dangerous times ahead.
@xfactor60992 жыл бұрын
yeah but you still cant get the F-22 to work. lol
@jasonjones48912 жыл бұрын
It won't be all drones . The us isn't that stupid. Men still win wars. Drones win sneak attacks . Anybody knows anything about war. It's boots on the ground. Or asses in seats.
@kdrapertrucker2 жыл бұрын
Drones can't fogfight
@kdrapertrucker2 жыл бұрын
@@xfactor6099 you have no idea what you are talking about.
@xfactor60992 жыл бұрын
@@kdrapertrucker it's clear you don't either.
@MostlyPennyCat2 жыл бұрын
Another important factor of 4G fighters and the reason they added fly by wire is relaxed stability. This give the aircraft incredible ability but make it technically unflyable. They require 1000s of input corrections every second just to fly the plate straight and level. Enter flu by wire. It maintains a mathematical model of the aircraft in the computer and only the computer has access to the flight controls. 1000s of times a second it uses onboard sensors to update the state of the model. Now you add the pilot. They input what they want the aircraft to do, say, roll Now, 1000s of times a second time computer takes the pilots inputs, subtracts from them the current balancing inputs calculated from the model and sensors and send _that_ too the control surfaces. Now the plane rolls and to the pilot it's a traditional natural stability aircraft.
@kingkea34512 жыл бұрын
Gotta love PID control
@fridaycaliforniaa2362 жыл бұрын
As a former military pilot myself, I really love this kind of comments under a YT video. GG, sir =)
@yayayayya47312 жыл бұрын
And 6th gen fighters may be even more unstable than 4th gen
@martinpenwald94752 жыл бұрын
> Enter flu by wire Is that some kind of computer virus? :)
@MaticTheProto2 жыл бұрын
A way simpler version is often used in cars nowadays with the gas pedal. You essentially just tell the car how fast you want it to go and a computer figures out the most effective way to get there considering the circumstances
@captain_commenter87962 жыл бұрын
Even though this jet is built to kill, you gotta admit, this plane is BEAUTIFUL, the sleek lines and wing configuration truly makes it look futuristic.
@edwardzhang51422 жыл бұрын
Best looking 6th gen concept so far IMO!
@ScorpionXXXVII2 жыл бұрын
Still just looks like the Aurora from the 90s on
@yoamal11872 жыл бұрын
it's just a concept, there's a big change it's not gonna look like this
@adamf6632 жыл бұрын
plus you get to see the attacker's economy go down the tubes
@BusterBuizel2 жыл бұрын
They make them beautiful because it’s the last thing some people see
@jeffreyexposito38032 жыл бұрын
The next American fighter: 1. Very stealthy 2! Very long range 3. Very fast 4. Will carry alot of weapons internally 5. Will be highly networked with drones and ground and naval forces
@thatguyalex28352 жыл бұрын
So, this is the F-36 or F-38, since the F-numbers end in 2, 4, 6, and 8 (except the F-35)? The Lockheed naming scheme is strange.
@someone._.53332 жыл бұрын
very american
@jeffreyexposito38032 жыл бұрын
@@thatguyalex2835 I doubt it. We may see something like F-200. Something totally different
@yewtoob20072 жыл бұрын
6. Very expensive
@thatguyalex28352 жыл бұрын
@@jeffreyexposito3803 Hmm. Who knows
@majorborngusfluunduch86942 жыл бұрын
I love the Drone Wingman concept, but I wonder how much extra workload it will put on the pilot. If I were designing these planes, I'd make it a two-seater so the you'd have the Co-pilot fiddling with the high tech stuff and the pilot can focus more on his "fighter pilot shit", to put it one way.
@tinyhippo16442 жыл бұрын
all depends on how much ai gets implemented. If it can target and fire on its own id assume not much more than they have now.
@DOSFS2 жыл бұрын
Depending on AI advancement I think if AI at least can do the simple job with minimal control then it might be possible for only one pilot. If not maybe we see 2 seaters.
@fridaycaliforniaa2362 жыл бұрын
_Dr. Keith Orbit's artificial intelligence, the "EDI", enters the chat_
@MaticTheProto2 жыл бұрын
Europe is developing a similar concept. It’s the best of both worlds and in the worst case, the drones could sacrifice themselves to save the manned jet
@shenrr68022 жыл бұрын
I imagine part of the AI systems and new generation, is that the pilot tasks are greatly reduced, turning the pilot into more of an operator. At this stage, you'll never get surprised into dogfight distance.
@mikethompson26502 жыл бұрын
ex-USAF, nearly 70, hope I live long enough to see the real McCoy.
@SJstackinbodys2 жыл бұрын
Other countrys: but.....but we just got to half ass 5th gen fighters America: we dont care *unvails X-wing fighter with cloaking and deflector shielding proton torpedoes and high powerd ion weaponry*
@pythontf1882 жыл бұрын
If requested they could find a way
@apex_blue2 жыл бұрын
If you fix the hierarchy, I bet you will have another Apollo program, and rumors that the US tested a antigravity plane.
@SJstackinbodys2 жыл бұрын
@@apex_blue they already have antimatter nuclear weapons so thats not far fetched
@pythontf1882 жыл бұрын
@@apex_blue we have another apollo program called Artemis.
@apex_blue2 жыл бұрын
@@pythontf188 I’m talking about innovation, the Apollo program was nothing short of a miracle of engineering, sure their plan of attack was throwing more money at it, but it worked.
@markrowland13662 жыл бұрын
In its first radar test, the F 22, gave a return equal to a flat circle of metal, a single milimetre in diameter, in the form of a 3mm metal ball bearing.
@Olkv3D2 жыл бұрын
Hahaa That's awesome.
@icecold95112 жыл бұрын
During radar testing of the F117, they failed and could see it on radar. Then the mockup took off and flew away. It was a bird on the mockup.
@Kman31ca2 жыл бұрын
@@icecold9511 Ya that was a great story to listen to. It was an owl to be precise but shows that stealth really works.
@MrHel-hf3nk2 жыл бұрын
@@Kman31ca Though, owls don't travel at hundreds, sometimes thousands, of miles per hour.
@aburetik48662 жыл бұрын
FA-XX looks like a copy of the Chinese J-20
@richardscott81862 жыл бұрын
Love it's been flight tested already after only a year! Can hardly wait to see it.
@derekcraig36172 жыл бұрын
I got a bridge to sell you if you believe this video
@firstduckofwellington68892 жыл бұрын
probably a technology demonstrator
@firstduckofwellington68892 жыл бұрын
@@derekcraig3617 It’s known that something has been flown
@abinmohan36752 жыл бұрын
Tech demonstrator
@apex_blue2 жыл бұрын
@@derekcraig3617 I don’t doubt it, knowing the US military it’s probably a prototype, but still.
@Michael_Michaels2 жыл бұрын
Whenever I hear about the next generation of fighters, I always get anxious because I cannot wait to watch an airplane reach very high Mach speed!! And by very high, I mean at least Mach 3.5!
@thatguyalex28352 жыл бұрын
Who knows, the F-38 (or whatever the F-XX would be named) could go Mach 3. :)
@myusername36892 жыл бұрын
The material science is a bit…… off….. tho. Mach 3 makes the aircraft really hot and s ducts probably are not very practical for that kind of speed since it massively adds drag which would require much more powerful engines. Not to mention RAM coatings would probably be obliterated by the air friction. But who knows, maybe that kind of engine and material science is actually possible but classified.
@SoloRenegade2 жыл бұрын
fighter jets have been slowing down. With missiles, drones, and smart weapons, speed for the fighter plane is no longer critical. Speed of the weapon is still important though. F-35, F-18 and others don't even go Mach 2, and weren't designed to, nor required to.
@hrvojemikulcic70742 жыл бұрын
How will make a engine..!?How many fuel can fit into tank of plane...!?10 tons?15 tons?
@MaticTheProto2 жыл бұрын
Honestly speed isn’t necessarily the goal anymore. It’s all about stealth and long range attacks. The faster a plane needs to go, the more expensive it becomes (we are talking about exponential price increases here).
@JMurph20152 жыл бұрын
As someone who has no insider knowledge right now, my prediction is that we will see more of the YF-23 design someday. At the time, the USAF was mad at Northrop for blowing the budget on the B-2 program, so at least partially due to that, the YF-23 narrowly lost that bid. I think a slightly larger, 2-seated version of that with completely modernized engines and avionics seems really compelling for a 2030's fighter jet. The way air combat has changed in recent years has really gone right according to plan for the YF-23 even compared to the F-22. The game is less about turn-fighting and more about how quickly, quietly, and effectively you can get in and get back out. The F-35 claims to embrace that same ethos, but it is not nearly as stealthy as the F-22 (let alone the YF-23 which was rumored to be slightly stealthier), it can't carry more than a few hundred miles of fuel, and its single engine is overburdened with how chunky it got. Both the F-22 and YF-23 still have better kinematics than the F-35 despite their superior stealth and range.
@Aaron-wq3jz2 жыл бұрын
Most of that was correct but the F35 has more range and capability than u think
@noncog12 жыл бұрын
Japan's 6th gen is using the yf-23 as a starting point
@LRRPFco522 жыл бұрын
The YF-23 represented more risk since it had several problems in DEMVAL. * They cracked several wind screens according to test pilot Paul Metz. * They were not able to reach Mach 2 due to intake geometry and boundary layer control. * They did not demonstrate weapons storage or separation. * They doubled the control surface actuator count to get the wings clean from any bulbous fairings common to other aircraft. JSF are actually more stealthy than the Raptor from frontal aspect, oblique, and rear since Lot 4. They use more CF structures, which are RF permeable/non-reflective. F-35A has longer mission radius than the Raptor on internal fuel. Same with F-35C. In large force exercises, JSF regularly defeat F-22s and prevent them from attacking Blue Forces. This has been true since 2017. F-22 was cheated out of its AIRST, so it has no long range IR detection sensors as originally planned.
@JMurph20152 жыл бұрын
@@LRRPFco52 to be fair I had somehow not seen the reports of the JSF's stealth improving in the early 2010's. Its shaping is much sloppier than either ATF plane, but evidently the new structures/coatings that were added to the JSF make up for a lot of it. Also, while their mission radius is stated as close to or exceeding the Raptors, the fact that the ferry range is still somewhat lower even on the F-35A makes me think there are different definitions of "mission radius" being used.
@andrewmoore70222 жыл бұрын
@@JMurph2015the difference in ferry range is because the F-35 doesn't carry Any external fuel tanks.
@doriankrasevecmiljas5082 жыл бұрын
11:17 Hortens parked next to the runway are a nice touch
@sevrent28112 жыл бұрын
6th gen imo should have 1. AI/ML to integrate and condense information for the pilot 2. Integration of sensors, and the ability to network with any military asset. For example, the targeting information from the jet is able to be communicated to another jet, or warships/ground systems etc. This can allow the fighters to target and destroy using weapons from other sources. Interestignly, this is something the US is already working on with JADC2. Recently an F35 was able to send 3. High speed. super cruise should be between mach 1.8-2.0. Afterburner should reach mach 2.5 minimum 4. Longer range. Especially important for naval variant, because countries like China are making missiles to deny carriers from operating near their coast. Longer range jets allow carriers to be sationed farther away and still project force, or do much deeper strikes 5. Stealth. (obvious) Removal of tail seems to be the meta for 6th gen, significantly improves stealth and less drag. 6. Integration with drones. Drones would be a game changer, because they can allow the fighter to turn radars off and remain very well hidden; while drones can scout ahead to gain information and send it back to the fighter. The drones do the risky tasks that would be to much of a risk for manned fighters to do. Losing a drone is no where near as bad as losing an entire jet along with a very well trained pilot. 7. Enhanced ECM. For the US, doing SEAD/DEAD operations is very important, especially after Desert Storm. ECM and other measures to degrade enemy radars, and missiles greatly enhance SEAD capabilities. Overall, the US is well positioned for 6th gen. The US already has very advanced engines under development (AETP) they've already built prototypes for. The new engines are stated to have around 15% more thrust, 25% better fuel efficiency, and 50% better thermal management compared to the F135, which is the most powerful jet engine right now. With these stats, 6th gen engines should be pushing around 210kn of thrust which is insane. The better thermal management, and power also makes laser weapons, and more powerful radars possible as well; keep in mind F-XX will most likely have 2 of these engines installed. Infact these engines are poised to be placed in F-35's by 2027. Advance engines are going to be required for 6th gen, China is behind in engine technology; only just now capable of designing engines comparable to the F22 raptor, whose engines represent US technology from the late 80s and early 90s. Meanwhile Russia has budgeting problems. Europe has the money, and the know how to make 6th gen engines as well. Rolls Royce knows what they are doing. Japan also started to investigate engine technology early on as well.
@peterboy2092 жыл бұрын
Looks like a yf-23 follow-up design. Northrop was far ahead of it's time. Time to build it now.
@myusername36892 жыл бұрын
A mix of YF-23, X-44, and X-36.
@laujack242 жыл бұрын
no need to waste time and money any more, when u have a super good one already siting in ur existent library. just need to perfect it and its ready to go.
@EngineEnginer2 жыл бұрын
@@myusername3689 yes this is PERFECT mix
@aburetik4866 Жыл бұрын
FA-XX is a blatant copy of the Chinese J20 🤭
@Adohleas Жыл бұрын
@@aburetik4866 Not really, they both look drastically different.
@kre4ture218 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for showing some love to the Eurofighter. Such a beautiful and capable plane that gets too little attention on KZbin
@kristopherdetar43462 жыл бұрын
They have been working on the 6th generation for a number of years. The military drones in service in recent years have been gathering tons of flight and performance information for this programs.
@jeffk4642 жыл бұрын
The question is does China have the blueprints and software yet?
@maple10102 жыл бұрын
@@jeffk464 they might but I don’t think they will be able to spare the money with the fact that Chinese economy is not exactly good at the moment
@aburetik4866 Жыл бұрын
FA-XX is a blatant copy of the Chinese J20 🤭
@aburetik4866 Жыл бұрын
@@user-bk8dq4ys1u You can take a look at J20, F22 and FA-XX, and see which two look more similar 🤭
@D9fjg9 ай бұрын
@@aburetik4866 NOOooOoooOOOOoOOo!!11
@DocHolliday18512 жыл бұрын
Man, I love warbirds, fighter jets, and battleships!
@Dragons_Armory2 жыл бұрын
*Have you ever heard of the tragedy of Darth F-35???*
@Yuki_Ika72 жыл бұрын
truth, the project is kinda a dumpster fire (no offence to those who worked on it, thier work is appreciated)
@firstduckofwellington68892 жыл бұрын
@@Yuki_Ika7 took a while, though still a greater impact than the F22
@Justanotherconsumer2 жыл бұрын
@@Yuki_Ika7 is it? There’s been a lot of hate for the F-35 that’s been debunked. The price tag is a dumpster fire, but… ‘Murica.
@yangsong507 Жыл бұрын
You are right, but the US Boeing-767 Heavy Patrol Missile is the largest conventional missile in human history, carrying nearly 100 tons of fuel charge. In a special military operation related to the Middle East, a single attack destroyed two huge fortresses, killing more than 2,900 enemies and wounding more than 6,200.
@fencserx94232 жыл бұрын
I do love the name “Loyal Wingman”
@valenrn86572 жыл бұрын
F/A-XX is USN's project for replacing F/A-18E/E Super Hornet NGAD is USAF's project for replacing F-22A.
@blurglide2 жыл бұрын
These will definitely need to be multi-seat fighters to effectively control UAVs
@KergylKraft2 жыл бұрын
6 gen fighters are epic, and this content is great. Those are FA-XX (aka facts).
@VollstandigErleuchtung2 жыл бұрын
I'm always 2 late... Fax
@pegasusted25042 жыл бұрын
buh dum tsssss ;~)
@kaylahills37602 жыл бұрын
🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢 6th generation fighters look ugly.
@CausticLemons72 жыл бұрын
I love these future focused videos! Even if there's a lot of speculation it's still fun to think about.
@owld.b.a.pbrowlornolaowl52182 жыл бұрын
Yeah but the age of fighters as we know it is done. My personal speculation is man fighters will be nothing more than "air guard" to vital assets. Patrolling for missiles and drones keeping them off troops, AWACS, helicopters and the next gen A-10. The 22, 35, and next gen fighters is the military not realizing that the battle field has changed. There for a waste in funds. Though force vector have use in a defense aircraft. Reduction in fuel burn while still have the ability to adjust to threats quickly.
@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman Жыл бұрын
@@owld.b.a.pbrowlornolaowl5218for sure
@kerbodynamicx4722 жыл бұрын
I think the next generation of aerial combat will not compose of a single aircraft, but a system composed of aircrafts specialised in various roles. From small to large, the smallest units will be autonomous drones. They are small, cheap and exceptionally manoeuvrable (able to pull intense manoeuvres that no human can handle). They will act as a defence role, intercepting enemy aircraft and missiles, sacrificing themselves to protect larger allied aircrafts. Quite defenceless on their own, but quite formidable in swarms. Specialised aircrafts, these includes interceptors, e-war aircrafts, hypersonic recons, and surface attack aircrafts. These can be manned or unmanned, each can relay command signals, they are responsible for offensive actions and are dependant on each other. Central command aircraft, these are the moving command stations of the Air Force, they do the support role, away from the front line. It will coordinate the numerous drones and manned aircrafts. Although it does not pack offensive weaponry, it has a laser defence array and a powerful jamming device, which can seriously mess with any missiles that come in its way.
@ayuchanayuko2 жыл бұрын
Sounds like AC7's Arsenal Bird
@aburetik48662 жыл бұрын
FA-XX looks like a copy of the Chinese J-20
@minetubequest2 жыл бұрын
Can we just appreciate how beautiful this next gen jet looks rather than just looking at the techs built into it.
@albertvanderheiden74192 жыл бұрын
Dogfight will always be imported. If your enemy is just as stealthy as you,Your only have daylight and your MK1 eyeballs to see eachother. Sort of return to the days of Manfred von Richthoven.
@gundam52812 жыл бұрын
So this new aircraft is like a Newtype mobile suit where it will operate separate systems similar in function to the funnels.
@DespinaValnir10 ай бұрын
All we need now is an Arsenal Bird
@-qsprey7881 Жыл бұрын
When the canards are on Chinese planes it's a huge reflector that destroys stealth, when the canards are on America's next generation planes, that's fine, it's totally stealthy. The above is modern physics, amazing! Simply magic!
@313A9 Жыл бұрын
innit western propoganda goes hard lmao
@everypitchcounts48752 жыл бұрын
MQ-25 Stingray, X-36, X-47b, MQ-8 Fire Scout, loyal wingman, LaWS Laser & Weapons System
@SoloRenegade2 жыл бұрын
USMC K-MAX, RQ-7 Shadow, MQ-1, MQ-9, RQ-4 global hawk, RQ-11 Raven, RQ-170 Sentinel, RQ-20 Puma, RQ-16 T-Hawk, and more. All used operationally. I personally saw or used or worked with the following in Iraq and Afghanistan: RQ-20 Puma, RQ-16 T-Hawk, RQ-11 Raven, K-MAX, RQ-7 Shadow, MQ-1, MQ-9, and a sentinel crashed and recovered by Iran when I was in Afghanistan.
@mortified7762 жыл бұрын
I like the design at 07:36. What was the inspiration? Looks like a roughly YF-17-sized version of the YF-23. (Which would be very cool!) Is it meant to illustrate something specific IRL, or just a flight of fancy? Either way, I'd love to see more of it.
@travisoverlie38862 жыл бұрын
You should make a found and explained virtual air museum
@Kai-pg3xz2 жыл бұрын
Kinda reminds me of the YF-23 “black widow” honestly
@yoamal11872 жыл бұрын
How 💀
@Kai-pg3xz2 жыл бұрын
@@yoamal1187 Look of the cockpit and engines
@Yuki_Ika72 жыл бұрын
agreed, one of the most sexy plane designs EVER!!!!
@yoamal11872 жыл бұрын
@@Kai-pg3xz the yf23s engines are flatter and the cockpit on the concept is way flatter
@Kai-pg3xz2 жыл бұрын
@Zeka Nova Get out
@benz90632 жыл бұрын
Think they should make a 2 seater version so one guy does the flying and the other person commands the drones.
@pramodjadhav47342 жыл бұрын
I really love your informative videos and the animation you use in the videos. I just want to ask how do you make this realistic animation ?
@roncyrebello64072 жыл бұрын
I guess he uses blender
@ChipCheerio2 жыл бұрын
The F35 is the next generation of fighter, it’s the next generation of almost all roles in the USAF. Did it have a long development? Yes, but so did the F15 and that was one of the greatest fighters ever created. The same kinds of people who naysay about the F35 are the same kinds of people who thought the F15 was doomed to fail because it was “over reliant on technology.”
@joejunior47002 жыл бұрын
My mind instantly goes to the utility those drones can offer as weapon stations for stealth fighters since putting under wing weapons means it's defeating its own stealth. Is it unrealistic for me to think that those drones could function as separate weapons carrier, that the pilot can just switch between multiple drones for weapon reserves like reserve fuel tanks on other vehicles?
@Kayluv101 Жыл бұрын
I like where america’s jets are heading that new b-21 raider is the coolest stealth bomber i’ve ever seen..
@estandsforidiot2 жыл бұрын
How do you make these models? they're really good
@fanofyoutube97942 жыл бұрын
This channel is underrated
@BusterBuizel2 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video on the ADFX-01 Morgan? I think *it’s time* you covered that :)
@haikalp.wibiyanto97322 жыл бұрын
We need to get this comment to the top, guys.
@BusterBuizel2 жыл бұрын
@@haikalp.wibiyanto9732
@rakhaputrasaska80812 жыл бұрын
Lesggoooo
@manemperorofmankind81192 жыл бұрын
Always find it funny that I’m books, movies and games they always gloss over the INSANELY long production times.
@marvelboy4life2 жыл бұрын
Looks like the f16 f22 f35 the euro fighter typhoon had a baby and this is what it looks like
@___Six___2 жыл бұрын
Love it or hate it,he do be spitting *FA-XX*
@xnomdfrost19382 жыл бұрын
oh no, don't put a lunatic girl on a 6th gen fighter along with 8 drones that shoots lazers
@verden23232 жыл бұрын
Ace combat moment
@chandrachurniyogi83942 жыл бұрын
the F-22E Raptor (Block III) stealth multi role interdictor strike fighter hasn't participated in a single conflict the U.S. faced till date . . . the Boeing Loyal Wingman autonomous multi role fighter support drone is truly the wingman in real sense of the word . . .
@archer11332 жыл бұрын
If it isn't a two-seater, it probably won't be able to incorporate drones.
@Mark.G4752 жыл бұрын
Do you think that the next generation fighter will have a remote controlled wingman or drone type fuel tanker?
@MaticTheProto2 жыл бұрын
It wouldn’t surprise me if Areal refueling becomes largely automated
@caseytodd76322 жыл бұрын
I love the way you talk. Your accent is awesome, and perfect for this kind of content.
@ShinTsurugi72 жыл бұрын
so, a real-life CFA-44 Nosferatu ?
@mill27122 жыл бұрын
Without the topside multi-rockets or a railgun.
@ShinTsurugi72 жыл бұрын
@@mill2712 might be, but if they're already prototyping a beam weaponry... It might not be far to get an aerial railgun
@jezzaboi21682 жыл бұрын
more like adf 11f
@nemesis77742 жыл бұрын
Funny that the sixth gen plane we see in this video is the german-french mock-up at the Bourget 2019 IIRC...
@jammiedodger70402 жыл бұрын
Will 6th generation fighter jets still have a gun alongside the laser
@Justanotherconsumer2 жыл бұрын
Depends on the intended use of the laser - likely it won’t be powerful enough to do meaningful damage to an aircraft and will be more about intercepting missiles and such: Guns are kinda useless anyway with a focus on BVR combat. Dogfighting is probably dead this time… but that claim has been made before and was wrong, so…
@joehasskamp55232 жыл бұрын
I just wanna say, thank you for your channel, I cannot get enough since I discovered it!!!!! 🤘🤘
@simp_ingtoanime76832 жыл бұрын
I love the look of it atleast lol
@spplS.2 жыл бұрын
2:21 ok lol, that was by far the best transition to the sponsored part ever.
@moerow82152 жыл бұрын
The narrators never take into account that advanced aeronautic vehicles are always being developed 24/7/365 via black budget projects and whatever the public sees is literally a small fraction of what’s already flying around. There’s more than likely 7th and 8th generation Skunk Works projects that are getting old given the unlimited funds going to the military industrial complex year round. 😐
@nocturnalpulse67202 жыл бұрын
No 7th or 8th...but, the research for the next gen of fighter had already started in the late 1990's, before the F-22 had even gone to production. What none of these videos, nor the majority of people commenting on them seem to remember is there there are massive gaps in the information that we civilians know about the aircraft in question. The real capabilities of the 5th Gen aircraft will not be known until they are all either in museums, or sold off to lesser allies.
@haberdasherrykr88862 жыл бұрын
You laypeople would be surprised at the amount of corruption that goes on in funding "black skunk works projects" Barely anything new will be released before 2030 Much of the actual development goes towards modernizing old gen equipment (blame lobbying for that) such as the 4++ or the 5++ gen aircrafts Also the 6th domain of war is being improved and devloped upon (that is the most important development of all which requires statistics (you laymen know it by a different name - artificial intelligence))
@nathanstrain77102 жыл бұрын
To make a good fighter jet into breach the threshold that would be at the reverberative speed and a catalyst of static conduction you'd have to electrically adapt and mechanically move a couple of variables but then the static threshold where you are being held
@interpl60892 жыл бұрын
This is cool n' all but the ''F/A-XX'' you are showing in this video is just artists rendering, their imagination what it might look like. Reality could be different in the sense, that it is maybe even more advanced, or maybe it looks like tweaked F-22. It will probably look like a F-22 with F-35 combined. I mean, someone from government stated in 2019, they tested their sixth gen. fighter. So, it's nothing new. We will get a look on it in 10 years time, like we did with everything else. It is probably flying already.
@edwardfletcher77902 жыл бұрын
That MIG-41 l mock up looks a lot like a stealth F1-11 Aardvark !
@timothyhernandez39852 жыл бұрын
First Nazi German luftwaffe: Horten Ho-299 (1944) Second US force: Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit (1997) Rhird Russia force: Sukhoi S-70 Okhotnik-B (2019) Old Soviet Yakovlev:Yak 38 (1971) and Yak 141 (1987) VTOL are history
@hphp314162 жыл бұрын
you forgot Northrop YB-35 1946
@timothyhernandez39852 жыл бұрын
@@hphp31416 Well your right, I didn’t watched YB-35 1946 before, but German Luftwaffe: Horten Ho-299 1944 copy American new plane: YB-35 1946
@andrewmoore70222 жыл бұрын
@@timothyhernandez3985 northrop was working on flying wing designs since 1940 with N-1M
@ThePowerLover2 жыл бұрын
@@andrewmoore7022 This.
@alexdarcydestsimon37672 жыл бұрын
I like that you tag the F22 as the only fifth generation fighter in service ! That's so true !
@theonlykyle2 жыл бұрын
j-20 copy be like
@theonlykyle2 жыл бұрын
@Swift Banking nah it isn’t gimme 1 reason how
@theonlykyle2 жыл бұрын
@Swift Banking gimme 1 reason how it is
@theonlykyle2 жыл бұрын
@Swift Banking proof?
@TeoDP72 жыл бұрын
It isn’t J-20 copy, enough
@Twiggo_The_Foxxo Жыл бұрын
Where do you see that?
@Andstronaut Жыл бұрын
lol imagine in 2140 people are like "6th Gen? Were at 69!"
@Wpns1752 жыл бұрын
Gen 4++ and Gen 5 have one other ability that defines them, and that is sensor fusion. People don't like to talk about it, but Sensor Fusion is just as important as stealth. Situation Awareness is VERY important in air to air and air to ground combat and 5th gen has it like nothing else.
@Enkaptaton2 жыл бұрын
I liked your transition into the advertisement for squarespace :D
@whtstr21332 жыл бұрын
I have parts for a 8th gen...I guess Can fly in any direction while facing one. A.I. video game based combat interface suite Weapon: Main- 6Mw microwave cannon @ 1/4 in. Diameter/1 mile Speed: limited only by structural strength. Mathematics unknown approaching light speeds. Propulsion: momentum transmission (my refined design) What? I wanted a flying car...
@duro845 Жыл бұрын
From swords and shields to this in a fairly short period of time. Mankind is extraordinary
@quentonlyles6199 ай бұрын
Or horrifying
@kathrynck2 жыл бұрын
I rather suspect that Roper was talking about the Boeing Wingman. Assuming he was talking about an NGAD platform which is nearly operational and could be considered a "prototype". If on the other hand, he was talking about a tech demonstrator to test features, it could just be a 4th gen aircraft which has modifications to test out some ideas in the air. Much like the X-31 was during the ATF program. News outlets infer far too much into exactly what Roper said.
@LastGoatKnight2 жыл бұрын
That plane looks like my Starscream (Transformers) toy's cockpit section which I screwed out to play with it. I was an interesting kid
@Isteak80 Жыл бұрын
I hope the 6th generation ends up with as much variety as the 3rd and 4th did, because the 5th generation was a surprisingly small pool
@gameftf45552 жыл бұрын
Best sponsor transition I've ever seen.
@extralargemcfries98912 жыл бұрын
Thumbnail fighter looks sick, but doesn’t look like it has too much yaw stability and could very easily enter a flat spin
@kaylahills37602 жыл бұрын
🙄
@grahamlambert650 Жыл бұрын
Such a good way of constructing it
@dr.bright56702 жыл бұрын
I really hope they continue to produce manned fighter aircraft because drones are starting to scare me. They're impressive as well, but the idea of machines becoming so detrimental to our air superiority is frightening.
@ericclausen67722 жыл бұрын
It's the drones that no one is aware of thats going to make it unbeatable in it's mission capabilities
@LordZero666 Жыл бұрын
This sounds totally like Macross. The VF-25 fighter commanding drones from Macross Frontier inmmediately comes to mind.
@NinjaKiller10222 жыл бұрын
No military equipment or weapons program is safe from hiccups and issues. The F-35 may have issues, but it is a very capable 5th generation fighter, and it will only get better with time and tuning. And the F-22 wont be phased out as quickly as people think, as it is currently under more modernization. Nevertheless, I’m extremely excited to see a 6th Generation Figher, and what it will bring to the battle field. One thing I love about the US military programs, they keep their programs mostly or completely under secrecy.
@archer11332 жыл бұрын
I think the F22 will be phased out quickly due to the fact the Air Force is cutting the budget for the program, and not maintaining the stealth coating on the aircraft that are in service.
@NinjaKiller10222 жыл бұрын
@@archer1133 that’s simply not true. The USAF continues to procure funding to upgrade the F22.
@archer11332 жыл бұрын
@@NinjaKiller1022 Although they may be upgrading a few aircraft (like the chrome raptors), the government has cut money from the program and has allocated that money to F-15EXs and other aircraft. Just look up "F22 budget cut" to see more details I guess.
@NinjaKiller10222 жыл бұрын
@@archer1133 I see what you are saying. But contrary to what is being told to the public, funding had not been cut for the F22 and it’s modernization. The government had stopped production of the jet, with the last one rolling off the production line back in 2012. The government has an obligation to keep modernizing the jet well past its last delivery. As someone that works with people, that work with this program, there has been no cut. It was the same when we were working on the EFV. The news was pushing that we had cut funding for and stopped operating on the EFV, when in reality, that was not the case. Furthermore, I don’t doubt that the US is allocating funds elsewhere, there’s a lot that we don’t know, or will ever know.
@bruinesuiker38702 жыл бұрын
This video aint about cap🧢 its about faxx✈
@waaki2 жыл бұрын
💀
@Sunny-cx7sb2 жыл бұрын
They should make a single stealth frame fighter that can be mounted with either a command and control capsule or a cockpit unit so it can be sent out either manned or unmanned
@JohnJohn-yl4ko2 жыл бұрын
Damn. So basically this plane is Lalah's Mobile-Armour. With the drones as it's bits. Nice
@earlosandwich74332 жыл бұрын
Thanks for finding and explaining this, man. Stay strong.
@gamerhoursco4922 жыл бұрын
looks pretty badass
@dumbkidwithanidea63982 жыл бұрын
"They don't have a website for this top secret project"
@antoniocampos86742 жыл бұрын
In this year, it's the fourty video "the next american fighter jet" already presented. Very good, very much, too much. Pleasant.
@Ashe20082 жыл бұрын
It would be cool when the reveal a 6 gen fighter as the F 1000 starting the millennium fighters
@kin34412 жыл бұрын
the pilots gonna be spittin faxx
@gigwatt1192 жыл бұрын
@Found and Explained your mock-up looks very much like the yf-23. Maybe this was the full size test aircraft they say they have already flown :P
@chrissmith-rv5ro2 жыл бұрын
I don't know if the Navy can maintain RAM at sea. The planes live on the flight deck for 6-7 months or longer with constant UV and salt spray. Look at the F35Cs on their first deployment. They look rusted. Stealth at sea may require a new carrier. One where the flight deck is below deck, and maintenance is done topside. Launch out of the bow.
@zacyoung44462 жыл бұрын
That would make landing very difficult because you're now aiming for a hole instead of a flat deck
@sta11ed152 жыл бұрын
@@zacyoung4446 VTOL in 6th gen?
@tyquone2 жыл бұрын
As a member of Sir Quandale’s Council, I can say we may or may not be developing our own 6th generation fighter and simultaneously creating an entire country.
@mateen68492 жыл бұрын
That mig 41 rendering is beautiful 😍
@seanbigay10422 жыл бұрын
All this talk of fighter generations leads me to share what I find to be quite a sobering observation ... There were at best only three AIRCRAFT generations between the Wright Flyer which first flew in 1903, and the A-12 Cygnus which first flew in 1962. The Wright Flyer was a string-and-canvas butterfly which flew no higher than thirty feet off the ground, at no more than 30 miles an hour. The A-12 Cygnus was the interceptor version of what became the SR-71 Blackbird. It was a fire-breathing dragon that flew at an altitude of AT LEAST 85,000 feet and a speed of AT LEAST Mach 3.1 ... faster than a speeding bullet. From butterfly to dragon in sixty years. Think about it seriously, and you begin to understand what Alvin Toffler meant by future shock.
@Tony.7952 жыл бұрын
If you take the moon landing into account it's even crazier.
@seanbigay10422 жыл бұрын
@@Tony.795 Ohhh, yeah. Big time.
@NOVAPHANTOM9 Жыл бұрын
The F/A-XX is the US Navy's 6th Gen fighter and it replaces the F/A-18 Hornet, The NGAD Program (FX or PCA) is the US Air Force's 6th Gen Fighter which replaces the F-22 Raptor (not sure if it replaces it)
@rgloria4010 ай бұрын
If you notice most of US NAVY jets now use design and placement to get High Alpha. The US Navy uses mathematics to adjust the center of gravity and center of lift to achieve rocking moments to achieve high alphas
@NOVAPHANTOM910 ай бұрын
@@rgloria40 hm, yes. But in this concept, it has some Canards like the J-20 or sorts but i think (based on my research) it will reduce the stealthiness of an aircraft unless if they reconstruct the Canards in some diamond shape or sorts or add it with RAM Coating. It'll be fine. Thus, it must carry a huge payload so its gonna be a CHUNKY aircraft where its compatible in launcing on the USS Nimitz & USS Gerald R. Ford and maybe some future Carriers (sorta).
@rgloria4010 ай бұрын
@@NOVAPHANTOM9 Compared to a Tail Rudder that are not slanted...It is a huge improvement. Rudder authority versus banking....looks to me it is a training issue at this point. I doubt the US Navy or USAir force will use retractable carnard or even a tail rudder....but who knows...
@NOVAPHANTOM910 ай бұрын
@@rgloria40 yeah, i mean totally a yes. If you want an agile aircraft, you can just make Thrust Vectoring technology on your 6th gen compare to the F-22's 2d Thrust Vector & some Russian aircrafts like the Su-57, Su-30 and etc. which has 3d Thrust vectoring.
@tammyforbes21012 жыл бұрын
We need UAV fighter air craft, take the pilot out of the air plane so we can fly them farther faster and into more dangerous places without worrying about loosing a valuable pilot! We can make more UAV’s but it takes lot of time and money to make competitive pilots. Imagine being in a Russian jet and having to face a pack of UAV F-22 raptors that can pull 30 G’s where you could only pull 10 for very short periods of time. You loose you die we loose we just make another UAV and send that one after you to. This is where war is headed get the people out of there let them machines settle it if we must fight!
@426superbee42 жыл бұрын
These jets are more maneuverable than the old biplanes ever was
@necromancer0616 Жыл бұрын
LOL, "They don't have a website for a topsecret project!". They must have good Stealth capability.
@jeromebarry17412 жыл бұрын
I thought I read that the MiG design bureau had been closed. What's this Mig-41 of which you speak?
@kokomanation27 күн бұрын
F 22 has a very good reputation as a fighter jet I am not sure but I think it also has some stealth capabilities
@kevinroberts84416 ай бұрын
I imagine the next generation of fighter we'll only be able to buy one the way these things go
@JacktheW772 жыл бұрын
Everybody gangsta till the ace combat planes become real