FA-XX - The Next American Fighter Jet

  Рет қаралды 1,080,184

Found And Explained

Found And Explained

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 1 100
@skyejamss
@skyejamss 2 жыл бұрын
The fact that the USAF publicly announced that they flew a prototype of this jet last year is just beyond amazing, they probably already have the final model of it
@VincentNajger1
@VincentNajger1 2 жыл бұрын
Check out the X-36. This tailless design was already perfected in the late 1990s......the basic design and flight controllers are already a quarter century old. That blows my mind.
@ericclausen6772
@ericclausen6772 2 жыл бұрын
There not the last but a continuous upgrade.
@reginaldmctinface7910
@reginaldmctinface7910 2 жыл бұрын
loyd austin may have already seen a mock-up or flight test at tonopah
@NarasimhaDiyasena
@NarasimhaDiyasena 2 жыл бұрын
Lot of this tech is reverse engineered from Roswell and incorporates an evolution of earth based jet propulsion which is inferior compared to that produced from Zeta Reticuli. The F-117 design is similar that the craft at Roswell, according to the daughter of an officer in charge of the R&D who kept a cryptic journal for her to later read. You can see the R&D come to fruition in the Naval Patents posted under Salvator Pais. In contrast the iconic Flying Saucer UFO is the Huanebu, which is the reverse engineering of Vimana’s from the Bharat Civilization (8,000BCE-2,000BCE) . The Bell shape on top of every Hindu Temple represents a Vimana. The SS E-IV (Entwicklungsstelle 4), which was an R&D Unit to the SS’s Occult “Order of the Black Sun”, was tasked in researching alternative sources of energy to allow for the Reich to achieve Energy Independence. This research was done in conjunction with the Thule Society who were in search of the Aryan Origins, being the Gods of Indo-European ‘myth’, leading them into India and Tibet where they obtained the knowledge to produce the iconic ‘Flying Saucer’.
@sirius2447
@sirius2447 2 жыл бұрын
True
@Fearls1
@Fearls1 2 жыл бұрын
The F22 was designed in the early 80's. Can you imagine what we have now, that is classified? It's all drones from here out, dangerous times ahead.
@xfactor6099
@xfactor6099 2 жыл бұрын
yeah but you still cant get the F-22 to work. lol
@jasonjones4891
@jasonjones4891 2 жыл бұрын
It won't be all drones . The us isn't that stupid. Men still win wars. Drones win sneak attacks . Anybody knows anything about war. It's boots on the ground. Or asses in seats.
@kdrapertrucker
@kdrapertrucker 2 жыл бұрын
Drones can't fogfight
@kdrapertrucker
@kdrapertrucker 2 жыл бұрын
@@xfactor6099 you have no idea what you are talking about.
@xfactor6099
@xfactor6099 2 жыл бұрын
@@kdrapertrucker it's clear you don't either.
@MostlyPennyCat
@MostlyPennyCat 2 жыл бұрын
Another important factor of 4G fighters and the reason they added fly by wire is relaxed stability. This give the aircraft incredible ability but make it technically unflyable. They require 1000s of input corrections every second just to fly the plate straight and level. Enter flu by wire. It maintains a mathematical model of the aircraft in the computer and only the computer has access to the flight controls. 1000s of times a second it uses onboard sensors to update the state of the model. Now you add the pilot. They input what they want the aircraft to do, say, roll Now, 1000s of times a second time computer takes the pilots inputs, subtracts from them the current balancing inputs calculated from the model and sensors and send _that_ too the control surfaces. Now the plane rolls and to the pilot it's a traditional natural stability aircraft.
@kingkea3451
@kingkea3451 2 жыл бұрын
Gotta love PID control
@fridaycaliforniaa236
@fridaycaliforniaa236 2 жыл бұрын
As a former military pilot myself, I really love this kind of comments under a YT video. GG, sir =)
@yayayayya4731
@yayayayya4731 2 жыл бұрын
And 6th gen fighters may be even more unstable than 4th gen
@martinpenwald9475
@martinpenwald9475 2 жыл бұрын
> Enter flu by wire Is that some kind of computer virus? :)
@MaticTheProto
@MaticTheProto 2 жыл бұрын
A way simpler version is often used in cars nowadays with the gas pedal. You essentially just tell the car how fast you want it to go and a computer figures out the most effective way to get there considering the circumstances
@captain_commenter8796
@captain_commenter8796 2 жыл бұрын
Even though this jet is built to kill, you gotta admit, this plane is BEAUTIFUL, the sleek lines and wing configuration truly makes it look futuristic.
@edwardzhang5142
@edwardzhang5142 2 жыл бұрын
Best looking 6th gen concept so far IMO!
@ScorpionXXXVII
@ScorpionXXXVII 2 жыл бұрын
Still just looks like the Aurora from the 90s on
@yoamal1187
@yoamal1187 2 жыл бұрын
it's just a concept, there's a big change it's not gonna look like this
@adamf663
@adamf663 2 жыл бұрын
plus you get to see the attacker's economy go down the tubes
@BusterBuizel
@BusterBuizel 2 жыл бұрын
They make them beautiful because it’s the last thing some people see
@jeffreyexposito3803
@jeffreyexposito3803 2 жыл бұрын
The next American fighter: 1. Very stealthy 2! Very long range 3. Very fast 4. Will carry alot of weapons internally 5. Will be highly networked with drones and ground and naval forces
@thatguyalex2835
@thatguyalex2835 2 жыл бұрын
So, this is the F-36 or F-38, since the F-numbers end in 2, 4, 6, and 8 (except the F-35)? The Lockheed naming scheme is strange.
@someone._.5333
@someone._.5333 2 жыл бұрын
very american
@jeffreyexposito3803
@jeffreyexposito3803 2 жыл бұрын
@@thatguyalex2835 I doubt it. We may see something like F-200. Something totally different
@yewtoob2007
@yewtoob2007 2 жыл бұрын
6. Very expensive
@thatguyalex2835
@thatguyalex2835 2 жыл бұрын
@@jeffreyexposito3803 Hmm. Who knows
@majorborngusfluunduch8694
@majorborngusfluunduch8694 2 жыл бұрын
I love the Drone Wingman concept, but I wonder how much extra workload it will put on the pilot. If I were designing these planes, I'd make it a two-seater so the you'd have the Co-pilot fiddling with the high tech stuff and the pilot can focus more on his "fighter pilot shit", to put it one way.
@tinyhippo1644
@tinyhippo1644 2 жыл бұрын
all depends on how much ai gets implemented. If it can target and fire on its own id assume not much more than they have now.
@DOSFS
@DOSFS 2 жыл бұрын
Depending on AI advancement I think if AI at least can do the simple job with minimal control then it might be possible for only one pilot. If not maybe we see 2 seaters.
@fridaycaliforniaa236
@fridaycaliforniaa236 2 жыл бұрын
_Dr. Keith Orbit's artificial intelligence, the "EDI", enters the chat_
@MaticTheProto
@MaticTheProto 2 жыл бұрын
Europe is developing a similar concept. It’s the best of both worlds and in the worst case, the drones could sacrifice themselves to save the manned jet
@shenrr6802
@shenrr6802 2 жыл бұрын
I imagine part of the AI systems and new generation, is that the pilot tasks are greatly reduced, turning the pilot into more of an operator. At this stage, you'll never get surprised into dogfight distance.
@mikethompson2650
@mikethompson2650 2 жыл бұрын
ex-USAF, nearly 70, hope I live long enough to see the real McCoy.
@SJstackinbodys
@SJstackinbodys 2 жыл бұрын
Other countrys: but.....but we just got to half ass 5th gen fighters America: we dont care *unvails X-wing fighter with cloaking and deflector shielding proton torpedoes and high powerd ion weaponry*
@pythontf188
@pythontf188 2 жыл бұрын
If requested they could find a way
@apex_blue
@apex_blue 2 жыл бұрын
If you fix the hierarchy, I bet you will have another Apollo program, and rumors that the US tested a antigravity plane.
@SJstackinbodys
@SJstackinbodys 2 жыл бұрын
@@apex_blue they already have antimatter nuclear weapons so thats not far fetched
@pythontf188
@pythontf188 2 жыл бұрын
@@apex_blue we have another apollo program called Artemis.
@apex_blue
@apex_blue 2 жыл бұрын
@@pythontf188 I’m talking about innovation, the Apollo program was nothing short of a miracle of engineering, sure their plan of attack was throwing more money at it, but it worked.
@markrowland1366
@markrowland1366 2 жыл бұрын
In its first radar test, the F 22, gave a return equal to a flat circle of metal, a single milimetre in diameter, in the form of a 3mm metal ball bearing.
@Olkv3D
@Olkv3D 2 жыл бұрын
Hahaa That's awesome.
@icecold9511
@icecold9511 2 жыл бұрын
During radar testing of the F117, they failed and could see it on radar. Then the mockup took off and flew away. It was a bird on the mockup.
@Kman31ca
@Kman31ca 2 жыл бұрын
@@icecold9511 Ya that was a great story to listen to. It was an owl to be precise but shows that stealth really works.
@MrHel-hf3nk
@MrHel-hf3nk 2 жыл бұрын
@@Kman31ca Though, owls don't travel at hundreds, sometimes thousands, of miles per hour.
@aburetik4866
@aburetik4866 2 жыл бұрын
FA-XX looks like a copy of the Chinese J-20
@richardscott8186
@richardscott8186 2 жыл бұрын
Love it's been flight tested already after only a year! Can hardly wait to see it.
@derekcraig3617
@derekcraig3617 2 жыл бұрын
I got a bridge to sell you if you believe this video
@firstduckofwellington6889
@firstduckofwellington6889 2 жыл бұрын
probably a technology demonstrator
@firstduckofwellington6889
@firstduckofwellington6889 2 жыл бұрын
@@derekcraig3617 It’s known that something has been flown
@abinmohan3675
@abinmohan3675 2 жыл бұрын
Tech demonstrator
@apex_blue
@apex_blue 2 жыл бұрын
@@derekcraig3617 I don’t doubt it, knowing the US military it’s probably a prototype, but still.
@Michael_Michaels
@Michael_Michaels 2 жыл бұрын
Whenever I hear about the next generation of fighters, I always get anxious because I cannot wait to watch an airplane reach very high Mach speed!! And by very high, I mean at least Mach 3.5!
@thatguyalex2835
@thatguyalex2835 2 жыл бұрын
Who knows, the F-38 (or whatever the F-XX would be named) could go Mach 3. :)
@myusername3689
@myusername3689 2 жыл бұрын
The material science is a bit…… off….. tho. Mach 3 makes the aircraft really hot and s ducts probably are not very practical for that kind of speed since it massively adds drag which would require much more powerful engines. Not to mention RAM coatings would probably be obliterated by the air friction. But who knows, maybe that kind of engine and material science is actually possible but classified.
@SoloRenegade
@SoloRenegade 2 жыл бұрын
fighter jets have been slowing down. With missiles, drones, and smart weapons, speed for the fighter plane is no longer critical. Speed of the weapon is still important though. F-35, F-18 and others don't even go Mach 2, and weren't designed to, nor required to.
@hrvojemikulcic7074
@hrvojemikulcic7074 2 жыл бұрын
How will make a engine..!?How many fuel can fit into tank of plane...!?10 tons?15 tons?
@MaticTheProto
@MaticTheProto 2 жыл бұрын
Honestly speed isn’t necessarily the goal anymore. It’s all about stealth and long range attacks. The faster a plane needs to go, the more expensive it becomes (we are talking about exponential price increases here).
@JMurph2015
@JMurph2015 2 жыл бұрын
As someone who has no insider knowledge right now, my prediction is that we will see more of the YF-23 design someday. At the time, the USAF was mad at Northrop for blowing the budget on the B-2 program, so at least partially due to that, the YF-23 narrowly lost that bid. I think a slightly larger, 2-seated version of that with completely modernized engines and avionics seems really compelling for a 2030's fighter jet. The way air combat has changed in recent years has really gone right according to plan for the YF-23 even compared to the F-22. The game is less about turn-fighting and more about how quickly, quietly, and effectively you can get in and get back out. The F-35 claims to embrace that same ethos, but it is not nearly as stealthy as the F-22 (let alone the YF-23 which was rumored to be slightly stealthier), it can't carry more than a few hundred miles of fuel, and its single engine is overburdened with how chunky it got. Both the F-22 and YF-23 still have better kinematics than the F-35 despite their superior stealth and range.
@Aaron-wq3jz
@Aaron-wq3jz 2 жыл бұрын
Most of that was correct but the F35 has more range and capability than u think
@noncog1
@noncog1 2 жыл бұрын
Japan's 6th gen is using the yf-23 as a starting point
@LRRPFco52
@LRRPFco52 2 жыл бұрын
The YF-23 represented more risk since it had several problems in DEMVAL. * They cracked several wind screens according to test pilot Paul Metz. * They were not able to reach Mach 2 due to intake geometry and boundary layer control. * They did not demonstrate weapons storage or separation. * They doubled the control surface actuator count to get the wings clean from any bulbous fairings common to other aircraft. JSF are actually more stealthy than the Raptor from frontal aspect, oblique, and rear since Lot 4. They use more CF structures, which are RF permeable/non-reflective. F-35A has longer mission radius than the Raptor on internal fuel. Same with F-35C. In large force exercises, JSF regularly defeat F-22s and prevent them from attacking Blue Forces. This has been true since 2017. F-22 was cheated out of its AIRST, so it has no long range IR detection sensors as originally planned.
@JMurph2015
@JMurph2015 2 жыл бұрын
@@LRRPFco52 to be fair I had somehow not seen the reports of the JSF's stealth improving in the early 2010's. Its shaping is much sloppier than either ATF plane, but evidently the new structures/coatings that were added to the JSF make up for a lot of it. Also, while their mission radius is stated as close to or exceeding the Raptors, the fact that the ferry range is still somewhat lower even on the F-35A makes me think there are different definitions of "mission radius" being used.
@andrewmoore7022
@andrewmoore7022 2 жыл бұрын
@@JMurph2015the difference in ferry range is because the F-35 doesn't carry Any external fuel tanks.
@doriankrasevecmiljas508
@doriankrasevecmiljas508 2 жыл бұрын
11:17 Hortens parked next to the runway are a nice touch
@sevrent2811
@sevrent2811 2 жыл бұрын
6th gen imo should have 1. AI/ML to integrate and condense information for the pilot 2. Integration of sensors, and the ability to network with any military asset. For example, the targeting information from the jet is able to be communicated to another jet, or warships/ground systems etc. This can allow the fighters to target and destroy using weapons from other sources. Interestignly, this is something the US is already working on with JADC2. Recently an F35 was able to send 3. High speed. super cruise should be between mach 1.8-2.0. Afterburner should reach mach 2.5 minimum 4. Longer range. Especially important for naval variant, because countries like China are making missiles to deny carriers from operating near their coast. Longer range jets allow carriers to be sationed farther away and still project force, or do much deeper strikes 5. Stealth. (obvious) Removal of tail seems to be the meta for 6th gen, significantly improves stealth and less drag. 6. Integration with drones. Drones would be a game changer, because they can allow the fighter to turn radars off and remain very well hidden; while drones can scout ahead to gain information and send it back to the fighter. The drones do the risky tasks that would be to much of a risk for manned fighters to do. Losing a drone is no where near as bad as losing an entire jet along with a very well trained pilot. 7. Enhanced ECM. For the US, doing SEAD/DEAD operations is very important, especially after Desert Storm. ECM and other measures to degrade enemy radars, and missiles greatly enhance SEAD capabilities. Overall, the US is well positioned for 6th gen. The US already has very advanced engines under development (AETP) they've already built prototypes for. The new engines are stated to have around 15% more thrust, 25% better fuel efficiency, and 50% better thermal management compared to the F135, which is the most powerful jet engine right now. With these stats, 6th gen engines should be pushing around 210kn of thrust which is insane. The better thermal management, and power also makes laser weapons, and more powerful radars possible as well; keep in mind F-XX will most likely have 2 of these engines installed. Infact these engines are poised to be placed in F-35's by 2027. Advance engines are going to be required for 6th gen, China is behind in engine technology; only just now capable of designing engines comparable to the F22 raptor, whose engines represent US technology from the late 80s and early 90s. Meanwhile Russia has budgeting problems. Europe has the money, and the know how to make 6th gen engines as well. Rolls Royce knows what they are doing. Japan also started to investigate engine technology early on as well.
@peterboy209
@peterboy209 2 жыл бұрын
Looks like a yf-23 follow-up design. Northrop was far ahead of it's time. Time to build it now.
@myusername3689
@myusername3689 2 жыл бұрын
A mix of YF-23, X-44, and X-36.
@laujack24
@laujack24 2 жыл бұрын
no need to waste time and money any more, when u have a super good one already siting in ur existent library. just need to perfect it and its ready to go.
@EngineEnginer
@EngineEnginer 2 жыл бұрын
@@myusername3689 yes this is PERFECT mix
@aburetik4866
@aburetik4866 Жыл бұрын
FA-XX is a blatant copy of the Chinese J20 🤭
@Adohleas
@Adohleas Жыл бұрын
@@aburetik4866 Not really, they both look drastically different.
@kre4ture218
@kre4ture218 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for showing some love to the Eurofighter. Such a beautiful and capable plane that gets too little attention on KZbin
@kristopherdetar4346
@kristopherdetar4346 2 жыл бұрын
They have been working on the 6th generation for a number of years. The military drones in service in recent years have been gathering tons of flight and performance information for this programs.
@jeffk464
@jeffk464 2 жыл бұрын
The question is does China have the blueprints and software yet?
@maple1010
@maple1010 2 жыл бұрын
@@jeffk464 they might but I don’t think they will be able to spare the money with the fact that Chinese economy is not exactly good at the moment
@aburetik4866
@aburetik4866 Жыл бұрын
FA-XX is a blatant copy of the Chinese J20 🤭
@aburetik4866
@aburetik4866 Жыл бұрын
@@user-bk8dq4ys1u You can take a look at J20, F22 and FA-XX, and see which two look more similar 🤭
@D9fjg
@D9fjg 9 ай бұрын
​@@aburetik4866 NOOooOoooOOOOoOOo!!11
@DocHolliday1851
@DocHolliday1851 2 жыл бұрын
Man, I love warbirds, fighter jets, and battleships!
@Dragons_Armory
@Dragons_Armory 2 жыл бұрын
*Have you ever heard of the tragedy of Darth F-35???*
@Yuki_Ika7
@Yuki_Ika7 2 жыл бұрын
truth, the project is kinda a dumpster fire (no offence to those who worked on it, thier work is appreciated)
@firstduckofwellington6889
@firstduckofwellington6889 2 жыл бұрын
@@Yuki_Ika7 took a while, though still a greater impact than the F22
@Justanotherconsumer
@Justanotherconsumer 2 жыл бұрын
@@Yuki_Ika7 is it? There’s been a lot of hate for the F-35 that’s been debunked. The price tag is a dumpster fire, but… ‘Murica.
@yangsong507
@yangsong507 Жыл бұрын
You are right, but the US Boeing-767 Heavy Patrol Missile is the largest conventional missile in human history, carrying nearly 100 tons of fuel charge. In a special military operation related to the Middle East, a single attack destroyed two huge fortresses, killing more than 2,900 enemies and wounding more than 6,200.
@fencserx9423
@fencserx9423 2 жыл бұрын
I do love the name “Loyal Wingman”
@valenrn8657
@valenrn8657 2 жыл бұрын
F/A-XX is USN's project for replacing F/A-18E/E Super Hornet NGAD is USAF's project for replacing F-22A.
@blurglide
@blurglide 2 жыл бұрын
These will definitely need to be multi-seat fighters to effectively control UAVs
@KergylKraft
@KergylKraft 2 жыл бұрын
6 gen fighters are epic, and this content is great. Those are FA-XX (aka facts).
@VollstandigErleuchtung
@VollstandigErleuchtung 2 жыл бұрын
I'm always 2 late... Fax
@pegasusted2504
@pegasusted2504 2 жыл бұрын
buh dum tsssss ;~)
@kaylahills3760
@kaylahills3760 2 жыл бұрын
🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢 6th generation fighters look ugly.
@CausticLemons7
@CausticLemons7 2 жыл бұрын
I love these future focused videos! Even if there's a lot of speculation it's still fun to think about.
@owld.b.a.pbrowlornolaowl5218
@owld.b.a.pbrowlornolaowl5218 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah but the age of fighters as we know it is done. My personal speculation is man fighters will be nothing more than "air guard" to vital assets. Patrolling for missiles and drones keeping them off troops, AWACS, helicopters and the next gen A-10. The 22, 35, and next gen fighters is the military not realizing that the battle field has changed. There for a waste in funds. Though force vector have use in a defense aircraft. Reduction in fuel burn while still have the ability to adjust to threats quickly.
@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman
@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman Жыл бұрын
​@@owld.b.a.pbrowlornolaowl5218for sure
@kerbodynamicx472
@kerbodynamicx472 2 жыл бұрын
I think the next generation of aerial combat will not compose of a single aircraft, but a system composed of aircrafts specialised in various roles. From small to large, the smallest units will be autonomous drones. They are small, cheap and exceptionally manoeuvrable (able to pull intense manoeuvres that no human can handle). They will act as a defence role, intercepting enemy aircraft and missiles, sacrificing themselves to protect larger allied aircrafts. Quite defenceless on their own, but quite formidable in swarms. Specialised aircrafts, these includes interceptors, e-war aircrafts, hypersonic recons, and surface attack aircrafts. These can be manned or unmanned, each can relay command signals, they are responsible for offensive actions and are dependant on each other. Central command aircraft, these are the moving command stations of the Air Force, they do the support role, away from the front line. It will coordinate the numerous drones and manned aircrafts. Although it does not pack offensive weaponry, it has a laser defence array and a powerful jamming device, which can seriously mess with any missiles that come in its way.
@ayuchanayuko
@ayuchanayuko 2 жыл бұрын
Sounds like AC7's Arsenal Bird
@aburetik4866
@aburetik4866 2 жыл бұрын
FA-XX looks like a copy of the Chinese J-20
@minetubequest
@minetubequest 2 жыл бұрын
Can we just appreciate how beautiful this next gen jet looks rather than just looking at the techs built into it.
@albertvanderheiden7419
@albertvanderheiden7419 2 жыл бұрын
Dogfight will always be imported. If your enemy is just as stealthy as you,Your only have daylight and your MK1 eyeballs to see eachother. Sort of return to the days of Manfred von Richthoven.
@gundam5281
@gundam5281 2 жыл бұрын
So this new aircraft is like a Newtype mobile suit where it will operate separate systems similar in function to the funnels.
@DespinaValnir
@DespinaValnir 10 ай бұрын
All we need now is an Arsenal Bird
@-qsprey7881
@-qsprey7881 Жыл бұрын
When the canards are on Chinese planes it's a huge reflector that destroys stealth, when the canards are on America's next generation planes, that's fine, it's totally stealthy. The above is modern physics, amazing! Simply magic!
@313A9
@313A9 Жыл бұрын
innit western propoganda goes hard lmao
@everypitchcounts4875
@everypitchcounts4875 2 жыл бұрын
MQ-25 Stingray, X-36, X-47b, MQ-8 Fire Scout, loyal wingman, LaWS Laser & Weapons System
@SoloRenegade
@SoloRenegade 2 жыл бұрын
USMC K-MAX, RQ-7 Shadow, MQ-1, MQ-9, RQ-4 global hawk, RQ-11 Raven, RQ-170 Sentinel, RQ-20 Puma, RQ-16 T-Hawk, and more. All used operationally. I personally saw or used or worked with the following in Iraq and Afghanistan: RQ-20 Puma, RQ-16 T-Hawk, RQ-11 Raven, K-MAX, RQ-7 Shadow, MQ-1, MQ-9, and a sentinel crashed and recovered by Iran when I was in Afghanistan.
@mortified776
@mortified776 2 жыл бұрын
I like the design at 07:36. What was the inspiration? Looks like a roughly YF-17-sized version of the YF-23. (Which would be very cool!) Is it meant to illustrate something specific IRL, or just a flight of fancy? Either way, I'd love to see more of it.
@travisoverlie3886
@travisoverlie3886 2 жыл бұрын
You should make a found and explained virtual air museum
@Kai-pg3xz
@Kai-pg3xz 2 жыл бұрын
Kinda reminds me of the YF-23 “black widow” honestly
@yoamal1187
@yoamal1187 2 жыл бұрын
How 💀
@Kai-pg3xz
@Kai-pg3xz 2 жыл бұрын
@@yoamal1187 Look of the cockpit and engines
@Yuki_Ika7
@Yuki_Ika7 2 жыл бұрын
agreed, one of the most sexy plane designs EVER!!!!
@yoamal1187
@yoamal1187 2 жыл бұрын
@@Kai-pg3xz the yf23s engines are flatter and the cockpit on the concept is way flatter
@Kai-pg3xz
@Kai-pg3xz 2 жыл бұрын
@Zeka Nova Get out
@benz9063
@benz9063 2 жыл бұрын
Think they should make a 2 seater version so one guy does the flying and the other person commands the drones.
@pramodjadhav4734
@pramodjadhav4734 2 жыл бұрын
I really love your informative videos and the animation you use in the videos. I just want to ask how do you make this realistic animation ?
@roncyrebello6407
@roncyrebello6407 2 жыл бұрын
I guess he uses blender
@ChipCheerio
@ChipCheerio 2 жыл бұрын
The F35 is the next generation of fighter, it’s the next generation of almost all roles in the USAF. Did it have a long development? Yes, but so did the F15 and that was one of the greatest fighters ever created. The same kinds of people who naysay about the F35 are the same kinds of people who thought the F15 was doomed to fail because it was “over reliant on technology.”
@joejunior4700
@joejunior4700 2 жыл бұрын
My mind instantly goes to the utility those drones can offer as weapon stations for stealth fighters since putting under wing weapons means it's defeating its own stealth. Is it unrealistic for me to think that those drones could function as separate weapons carrier, that the pilot can just switch between multiple drones for weapon reserves like reserve fuel tanks on other vehicles?
@Kayluv101
@Kayluv101 Жыл бұрын
I like where america’s jets are heading that new b-21 raider is the coolest stealth bomber i’ve ever seen..
@estandsforidiot
@estandsforidiot 2 жыл бұрын
How do you make these models? they're really good
@fanofyoutube9794
@fanofyoutube9794 2 жыл бұрын
This channel is underrated
@BusterBuizel
@BusterBuizel 2 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video on the ADFX-01 Morgan? I think *it’s time* you covered that :)
@haikalp.wibiyanto9732
@haikalp.wibiyanto9732 2 жыл бұрын
We need to get this comment to the top, guys.
@BusterBuizel
@BusterBuizel 2 жыл бұрын
@@haikalp.wibiyanto9732
@rakhaputrasaska8081
@rakhaputrasaska8081 2 жыл бұрын
Lesggoooo
@manemperorofmankind8119
@manemperorofmankind8119 2 жыл бұрын
Always find it funny that I’m books, movies and games they always gloss over the INSANELY long production times.
@marvelboy4life
@marvelboy4life 2 жыл бұрын
Looks like the f16 f22 f35 the euro fighter typhoon had a baby and this is what it looks like
@___Six___
@___Six___ 2 жыл бұрын
Love it or hate it,he do be spitting *FA-XX*
@xnomdfrost1938
@xnomdfrost1938 2 жыл бұрын
oh no, don't put a lunatic girl on a 6th gen fighter along with 8 drones that shoots lazers
@verden2323
@verden2323 2 жыл бұрын
Ace combat moment
@chandrachurniyogi8394
@chandrachurniyogi8394 2 жыл бұрын
the F-22E Raptor (Block III) stealth multi role interdictor strike fighter hasn't participated in a single conflict the U.S. faced till date . . . the Boeing Loyal Wingman autonomous multi role fighter support drone is truly the wingman in real sense of the word . . .
@archer1133
@archer1133 2 жыл бұрын
If it isn't a two-seater, it probably won't be able to incorporate drones.
@Mark.G475
@Mark.G475 2 жыл бұрын
Do you think that the next generation fighter will have a remote controlled wingman or drone type fuel tanker?
@MaticTheProto
@MaticTheProto 2 жыл бұрын
It wouldn’t surprise me if Areal refueling becomes largely automated
@caseytodd7632
@caseytodd7632 2 жыл бұрын
I love the way you talk. Your accent is awesome, and perfect for this kind of content.
@ShinTsurugi7
@ShinTsurugi7 2 жыл бұрын
so, a real-life CFA-44 Nosferatu ?
@mill2712
@mill2712 2 жыл бұрын
Without the topside multi-rockets or a railgun.
@ShinTsurugi7
@ShinTsurugi7 2 жыл бұрын
@@mill2712 might be, but if they're already prototyping a beam weaponry... It might not be far to get an aerial railgun
@jezzaboi2168
@jezzaboi2168 2 жыл бұрын
more like adf 11f
@nemesis7774
@nemesis7774 2 жыл бұрын
Funny that the sixth gen plane we see in this video is the german-french mock-up at the Bourget 2019 IIRC...
@jammiedodger7040
@jammiedodger7040 2 жыл бұрын
Will 6th generation fighter jets still have a gun alongside the laser
@Justanotherconsumer
@Justanotherconsumer 2 жыл бұрын
Depends on the intended use of the laser - likely it won’t be powerful enough to do meaningful damage to an aircraft and will be more about intercepting missiles and such: Guns are kinda useless anyway with a focus on BVR combat. Dogfighting is probably dead this time… but that claim has been made before and was wrong, so…
@joehasskamp5523
@joehasskamp5523 2 жыл бұрын
I just wanna say, thank you for your channel, I cannot get enough since I discovered it!!!!! 🤘🤘
@simp_ingtoanime7683
@simp_ingtoanime7683 2 жыл бұрын
I love the look of it atleast lol
@spplS.
@spplS. 2 жыл бұрын
2:21 ok lol, that was by far the best transition to the sponsored part ever.
@moerow8215
@moerow8215 2 жыл бұрын
The narrators never take into account that advanced aeronautic vehicles are always being developed 24/7/365 via black budget projects and whatever the public sees is literally a small fraction of what’s already flying around. There’s more than likely 7th and 8th generation Skunk Works projects that are getting old given the unlimited funds going to the military industrial complex year round. 😐
@nocturnalpulse6720
@nocturnalpulse6720 2 жыл бұрын
No 7th or 8th...but, the research for the next gen of fighter had already started in the late 1990's, before the F-22 had even gone to production. What none of these videos, nor the majority of people commenting on them seem to remember is there there are massive gaps in the information that we civilians know about the aircraft in question. The real capabilities of the 5th Gen aircraft will not be known until they are all either in museums, or sold off to lesser allies.
@haberdasherrykr8886
@haberdasherrykr8886 2 жыл бұрын
You laypeople would be surprised at the amount of corruption that goes on in funding "black skunk works projects" Barely anything new will be released before 2030 Much of the actual development goes towards modernizing old gen equipment (blame lobbying for that) such as the 4++ or the 5++ gen aircrafts Also the 6th domain of war is being improved and devloped upon (that is the most important development of all which requires statistics (you laymen know it by a different name - artificial intelligence))
@nathanstrain7710
@nathanstrain7710 2 жыл бұрын
To make a good fighter jet into breach the threshold that would be at the reverberative speed and a catalyst of static conduction you'd have to electrically adapt and mechanically move a couple of variables but then the static threshold where you are being held
@interpl6089
@interpl6089 2 жыл бұрын
This is cool n' all but the ''F/A-XX'' you are showing in this video is just artists rendering, their imagination what it might look like. Reality could be different in the sense, that it is maybe even more advanced, or maybe it looks like tweaked F-22. It will probably look like a F-22 with F-35 combined. I mean, someone from government stated in 2019, they tested their sixth gen. fighter. So, it's nothing new. We will get a look on it in 10 years time, like we did with everything else. It is probably flying already.
@edwardfletcher7790
@edwardfletcher7790 2 жыл бұрын
That MIG-41 l mock up looks a lot like a stealth F1-11 Aardvark !
@timothyhernandez3985
@timothyhernandez3985 2 жыл бұрын
First Nazi German luftwaffe: Horten Ho-299 (1944) Second US force: Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit (1997) Rhird Russia force: Sukhoi S-70 Okhotnik-B (2019) Old Soviet Yakovlev:Yak 38 (1971) and Yak 141 (1987) VTOL are history
@hphp31416
@hphp31416 2 жыл бұрын
you forgot Northrop YB-35 1946
@timothyhernandez3985
@timothyhernandez3985 2 жыл бұрын
@@hphp31416 Well your right, I didn’t watched YB-35 1946 before, but German Luftwaffe: Horten Ho-299 1944 copy American new plane: YB-35 1946
@andrewmoore7022
@andrewmoore7022 2 жыл бұрын
@@timothyhernandez3985 northrop was working on flying wing designs since 1940 with N-1M
@ThePowerLover
@ThePowerLover 2 жыл бұрын
@@andrewmoore7022 This.
@alexdarcydestsimon3767
@alexdarcydestsimon3767 2 жыл бұрын
I like that you tag the F22 as the only fifth generation fighter in service ! That's so true !
@theonlykyle
@theonlykyle 2 жыл бұрын
j-20 copy be like
@theonlykyle
@theonlykyle 2 жыл бұрын
@Swift Banking nah it isn’t gimme 1 reason how
@theonlykyle
@theonlykyle 2 жыл бұрын
@Swift Banking gimme 1 reason how it is
@theonlykyle
@theonlykyle 2 жыл бұрын
@Swift Banking proof?
@TeoDP7
@TeoDP7 2 жыл бұрын
It isn’t J-20 copy, enough
@Twiggo_The_Foxxo
@Twiggo_The_Foxxo Жыл бұрын
Where do you see that?
@Andstronaut
@Andstronaut Жыл бұрын
lol imagine in 2140 people are like "6th Gen? Were at 69!"
@Wpns175
@Wpns175 2 жыл бұрын
Gen 4++ and Gen 5 have one other ability that defines them, and that is sensor fusion. People don't like to talk about it, but Sensor Fusion is just as important as stealth. Situation Awareness is VERY important in air to air and air to ground combat and 5th gen has it like nothing else.
@Enkaptaton
@Enkaptaton 2 жыл бұрын
I liked your transition into the advertisement for squarespace :D
@whtstr2133
@whtstr2133 2 жыл бұрын
I have parts for a 8th gen...I guess Can fly in any direction while facing one. A.I. video game based combat interface suite Weapon: Main- 6Mw microwave cannon @ 1/4 in. Diameter/1 mile Speed: limited only by structural strength. Mathematics unknown approaching light speeds. Propulsion: momentum transmission (my refined design) What? I wanted a flying car...
@duro845
@duro845 Жыл бұрын
From swords and shields to this in a fairly short period of time. Mankind is extraordinary
@quentonlyles619
@quentonlyles619 9 ай бұрын
Or horrifying
@kathrynck
@kathrynck 2 жыл бұрын
I rather suspect that Roper was talking about the Boeing Wingman. Assuming he was talking about an NGAD platform which is nearly operational and could be considered a "prototype". If on the other hand, he was talking about a tech demonstrator to test features, it could just be a 4th gen aircraft which has modifications to test out some ideas in the air. Much like the X-31 was during the ATF program. News outlets infer far too much into exactly what Roper said.
@LastGoatKnight
@LastGoatKnight 2 жыл бұрын
That plane looks like my Starscream (Transformers) toy's cockpit section which I screwed out to play with it. I was an interesting kid
@Isteak80
@Isteak80 Жыл бұрын
I hope the 6th generation ends up with as much variety as the 3rd and 4th did, because the 5th generation was a surprisingly small pool
@gameftf4555
@gameftf4555 2 жыл бұрын
Best sponsor transition I've ever seen.
@extralargemcfries9891
@extralargemcfries9891 2 жыл бұрын
Thumbnail fighter looks sick, but doesn’t look like it has too much yaw stability and could very easily enter a flat spin
@kaylahills3760
@kaylahills3760 2 жыл бұрын
🙄
@grahamlambert650
@grahamlambert650 Жыл бұрын
Such a good way of constructing it
@dr.bright5670
@dr.bright5670 2 жыл бұрын
I really hope they continue to produce manned fighter aircraft because drones are starting to scare me. They're impressive as well, but the idea of machines becoming so detrimental to our air superiority is frightening.
@ericclausen6772
@ericclausen6772 2 жыл бұрын
It's the drones that no one is aware of thats going to make it unbeatable in it's mission capabilities
@LordZero666
@LordZero666 Жыл бұрын
This sounds totally like Macross. The VF-25 fighter commanding drones from Macross Frontier inmmediately comes to mind.
@NinjaKiller1022
@NinjaKiller1022 2 жыл бұрын
No military equipment or weapons program is safe from hiccups and issues. The F-35 may have issues, but it is a very capable 5th generation fighter, and it will only get better with time and tuning. And the F-22 wont be phased out as quickly as people think, as it is currently under more modernization. Nevertheless, I’m extremely excited to see a 6th Generation Figher, and what it will bring to the battle field. One thing I love about the US military programs, they keep their programs mostly or completely under secrecy.
@archer1133
@archer1133 2 жыл бұрын
I think the F22 will be phased out quickly due to the fact the Air Force is cutting the budget for the program, and not maintaining the stealth coating on the aircraft that are in service.
@NinjaKiller1022
@NinjaKiller1022 2 жыл бұрын
@@archer1133 that’s simply not true. The USAF continues to procure funding to upgrade the F22.
@archer1133
@archer1133 2 жыл бұрын
@@NinjaKiller1022 Although they may be upgrading a few aircraft (like the chrome raptors), the government has cut money from the program and has allocated that money to F-15EXs and other aircraft. Just look up "F22 budget cut" to see more details I guess.
@NinjaKiller1022
@NinjaKiller1022 2 жыл бұрын
@@archer1133 I see what you are saying. But contrary to what is being told to the public, funding had not been cut for the F22 and it’s modernization. The government had stopped production of the jet, with the last one rolling off the production line back in 2012. The government has an obligation to keep modernizing the jet well past its last delivery. As someone that works with people, that work with this program, there has been no cut. It was the same when we were working on the EFV. The news was pushing that we had cut funding for and stopped operating on the EFV, when in reality, that was not the case. Furthermore, I don’t doubt that the US is allocating funds elsewhere, there’s a lot that we don’t know, or will ever know.
@bruinesuiker3870
@bruinesuiker3870 2 жыл бұрын
This video aint about cap🧢 its about faxx✈
@waaki
@waaki 2 жыл бұрын
💀
@Sunny-cx7sb
@Sunny-cx7sb 2 жыл бұрын
They should make a single stealth frame fighter that can be mounted with either a command and control capsule or a cockpit unit so it can be sent out either manned or unmanned
@JohnJohn-yl4ko
@JohnJohn-yl4ko 2 жыл бұрын
Damn. So basically this plane is Lalah's Mobile-Armour. With the drones as it's bits. Nice
@earlosandwich7433
@earlosandwich7433 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for finding and explaining this, man. Stay strong.
@gamerhoursco492
@gamerhoursco492 2 жыл бұрын
looks pretty badass
@dumbkidwithanidea6398
@dumbkidwithanidea6398 2 жыл бұрын
"They don't have a website for this top secret project"
@antoniocampos8674
@antoniocampos8674 2 жыл бұрын
In this year, it's the fourty video "the next american fighter jet" already presented. Very good, very much, too much. Pleasant.
@Ashe2008
@Ashe2008 2 жыл бұрын
It would be cool when the reveal a 6 gen fighter as the F 1000 starting the millennium fighters
@kin3441
@kin3441 2 жыл бұрын
the pilots gonna be spittin faxx
@gigwatt119
@gigwatt119 2 жыл бұрын
@Found and Explained your mock-up looks very much like the yf-23. Maybe this was the full size test aircraft they say they have already flown :P
@chrissmith-rv5ro
@chrissmith-rv5ro 2 жыл бұрын
I don't know if the Navy can maintain RAM at sea. The planes live on the flight deck for 6-7 months or longer with constant UV and salt spray. Look at the F35Cs on their first deployment. They look rusted. Stealth at sea may require a new carrier. One where the flight deck is below deck, and maintenance is done topside. Launch out of the bow.
@zacyoung4446
@zacyoung4446 2 жыл бұрын
That would make landing very difficult because you're now aiming for a hole instead of a flat deck
@sta11ed15
@sta11ed15 2 жыл бұрын
@@zacyoung4446 VTOL in 6th gen?
@tyquone
@tyquone 2 жыл бұрын
As a member of Sir Quandale’s Council, I can say we may or may not be developing our own 6th generation fighter and simultaneously creating an entire country.
@mateen6849
@mateen6849 2 жыл бұрын
That mig 41 rendering is beautiful 😍
@seanbigay1042
@seanbigay1042 2 жыл бұрын
All this talk of fighter generations leads me to share what I find to be quite a sobering observation ... There were at best only three AIRCRAFT generations between the Wright Flyer which first flew in 1903, and the A-12 Cygnus which first flew in 1962. The Wright Flyer was a string-and-canvas butterfly which flew no higher than thirty feet off the ground, at no more than 30 miles an hour. The A-12 Cygnus was the interceptor version of what became the SR-71 Blackbird. It was a fire-breathing dragon that flew at an altitude of AT LEAST 85,000 feet and a speed of AT LEAST Mach 3.1 ... faster than a speeding bullet. From butterfly to dragon in sixty years. Think about it seriously, and you begin to understand what Alvin Toffler meant by future shock.
@Tony.795
@Tony.795 2 жыл бұрын
If you take the moon landing into account it's even crazier.
@seanbigay1042
@seanbigay1042 2 жыл бұрын
@@Tony.795 Ohhh, yeah. Big time.
@NOVAPHANTOM9
@NOVAPHANTOM9 Жыл бұрын
The F/A-XX is the US Navy's 6th Gen fighter and it replaces the F/A-18 Hornet, The NGAD Program (FX or PCA) is the US Air Force's 6th Gen Fighter which replaces the F-22 Raptor (not sure if it replaces it)
@rgloria40
@rgloria40 10 ай бұрын
If you notice most of US NAVY jets now use design and placement to get High Alpha. The US Navy uses mathematics to adjust the center of gravity and center of lift to achieve rocking moments to achieve high alphas
@NOVAPHANTOM9
@NOVAPHANTOM9 10 ай бұрын
@@rgloria40 hm, yes. But in this concept, it has some Canards like the J-20 or sorts but i think (based on my research) it will reduce the stealthiness of an aircraft unless if they reconstruct the Canards in some diamond shape or sorts or add it with RAM Coating. It'll be fine. Thus, it must carry a huge payload so its gonna be a CHUNKY aircraft where its compatible in launcing on the USS Nimitz & USS Gerald R. Ford and maybe some future Carriers (sorta).
@rgloria40
@rgloria40 10 ай бұрын
@@NOVAPHANTOM9 Compared to a Tail Rudder that are not slanted...It is a huge improvement. Rudder authority versus banking....looks to me it is a training issue at this point. I doubt the US Navy or USAir force will use retractable carnard or even a tail rudder....but who knows...
@NOVAPHANTOM9
@NOVAPHANTOM9 10 ай бұрын
@@rgloria40 yeah, i mean totally a yes. If you want an agile aircraft, you can just make Thrust Vectoring technology on your 6th gen compare to the F-22's 2d Thrust Vector & some Russian aircrafts like the Su-57, Su-30 and etc. which has 3d Thrust vectoring.
@tammyforbes2101
@tammyforbes2101 2 жыл бұрын
We need UAV fighter air craft, take the pilot out of the air plane so we can fly them farther faster and into more dangerous places without worrying about loosing a valuable pilot! We can make more UAV’s but it takes lot of time and money to make competitive pilots. Imagine being in a Russian jet and having to face a pack of UAV F-22 raptors that can pull 30 G’s where you could only pull 10 for very short periods of time. You loose you die we loose we just make another UAV and send that one after you to. This is where war is headed get the people out of there let them machines settle it if we must fight!
@426superbee4
@426superbee4 2 жыл бұрын
These jets are more maneuverable than the old biplanes ever was
@necromancer0616
@necromancer0616 Жыл бұрын
LOL, "They don't have a website for a topsecret project!". They must have good Stealth capability.
@jeromebarry1741
@jeromebarry1741 2 жыл бұрын
I thought I read that the MiG design bureau had been closed. What's this Mig-41 of which you speak?
@kokomanation
@kokomanation 27 күн бұрын
F 22 has a very good reputation as a fighter jet I am not sure but I think it also has some stealth capabilities
@kevinroberts8441
@kevinroberts8441 6 ай бұрын
I imagine the next generation of fighter we'll only be able to buy one the way these things go
@JacktheW77
@JacktheW77 2 жыл бұрын
Everybody gangsta till the ace combat planes become real
Lockheed Martins 6th Generation NGAD Fighter Tactics
18:57
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 888 М.
Why Russia's last fighter jet might already be a failure...
15:19
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 424 М.
How Strong is Tin Foil? 💪
00:25
Brianna
Рет қаралды 70 МЛН
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 🙈⚽️
00:46
Celine Dept
Рет қаралды 99 МЛН
小路飞还不知道他把路飞给擦没有了 #路飞#海贼王
00:32
路飞与唐舞桐
Рет қаралды 79 МЛН
Family Love #funny #sigma
00:16
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 53 МЛН
The INSANE Largest Aircraft Ever Designed - Lockheed CL-1201
15:24
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 954 М.
When you supersize the airforce you get this…- F-16XL
12:27
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 487 М.
F-14 Tomcat vs Soviet Built Jets
9:02
Yarnhub
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
Su-57 - Russia's 5th Gen Fighter
17:53
Australian Military Aviation History
Рет қаралды 713 М.
The Insane Engineering of the F-117 Nighthawk
27:37
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
NGAD vs FA-XX: The Future of Air Superiority
15:09
PilotPhotog
Рет қаралды 125 М.
Star Raker! - The Giant Insane Mach 7.2 Space Plane
20:48
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
Turkey's Home-Built Fighter is More than a Weapon
19:33
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
Why the Soviet answer to the F-16 failed - MiG 29 story
11:43
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
The Insane Engineering of the F-35B
25:04
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
How Strong is Tin Foil? 💪
00:25
Brianna
Рет қаралды 70 МЛН